Home Invektiven im Genozid. Zu Zeugnissen von überlebenden Tutsi
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Invektiven im Genozid. Zu Zeugnissen von überlebenden Tutsi

  • Anne D. Peiter
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Invective Discourse
This chapter is in the book Invective Discourse

Abstract

Drawing on testimonies from Rwandan survivors of the genocide against the Tutsi, this paper undertakes to understand the appellative nature of insults and their relationship to the nationwide systematic killings that became a reality in 1994. The animalisation of the Tutsi, particularly through the words "snake", "beetle", and "cockroach" and the "socio-zoological scale" implicit in them, functioned because the descriptive meaning of humiliating terms was supplemented by the prescriptive meaning of terms that could be described not only as "invective" but also as an "appeal to kill by word". On the one hand, this article traces the survivors' attempts to make the interplay of physical and linguistic violence conceivable; on the other hand, it also examines the role that invectives played in the cohesion of the perpetrators and the suppression of possible dissenting voices. From a theoretical point of view, I refer to Fritz Hermann's reflections on the action context of language.

Abstract

Drawing on testimonies from Rwandan survivors of the genocide against the Tutsi, this paper undertakes to understand the appellative nature of insults and their relationship to the nationwide systematic killings that became a reality in 1994. The animalisation of the Tutsi, particularly through the words "snake", "beetle", and "cockroach" and the "socio-zoological scale" implicit in them, functioned because the descriptive meaning of humiliating terms was supplemented by the prescriptive meaning of terms that could be described not only as "invective" but also as an "appeal to kill by word". On the one hand, this article traces the survivors' attempts to make the interplay of physical and linguistic violence conceivable; on the other hand, it also examines the role that invectives played in the cohesion of the perpetrators and the suppression of possible dissenting voices. From a theoretical point of view, I refer to Fritz Hermann's reflections on the action context of language.

Downloaded on 1.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111146553-009/html
Scroll to top button