Home Social Sciences Twelve Age discrimination in history
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Twelve Age discrimination in history

  • John Macnicol
View more publications by Policy Press
Social Policy Review 18
This chapter is in the book Social Policy Review 18

Abstract

This chapter offers an insightful historical analysis and outlines the age legislation linking it to four discernable trends: declining economic activity rates, demographic imperatives post-2020 with the associated increased pension costs, skills shortages and rising life expectancy. It considers the timing of this legislation and by outlining the recent history of the legislation, evaluates some of the tensions in the age discrimination debate and what has come to be called ageism set within an historical discourse. It argues that the difficulty has often been in providing legally verifiable proof, based on US experience of similar age legislation. It suggests that the uniqueness of the British ‘welfare state’, built up over centuries, has resulted in a contradictory assemblage of both positive and negative age-based discriminatory welfares. It concludes that the focus of the debate should be on long-term structural labour markets shifts and patterns that have ‘de-industrialized older men’.

Abstract

This chapter offers an insightful historical analysis and outlines the age legislation linking it to four discernable trends: declining economic activity rates, demographic imperatives post-2020 with the associated increased pension costs, skills shortages and rising life expectancy. It considers the timing of this legislation and by outlining the recent history of the legislation, evaluates some of the tensions in the age discrimination debate and what has come to be called ageism set within an historical discourse. It argues that the difficulty has often been in providing legally verifiable proof, based on US experience of similar age legislation. It suggests that the uniqueness of the British ‘welfare state’, built up over centuries, has resulted in a contradictory assemblage of both positive and negative age-based discriminatory welfares. It concludes that the focus of the debate should be on long-term structural labour markets shifts and patterns that have ‘de-industrialized older men’.

Downloaded on 21.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781847429186-015/html
Scroll to top button