Home Physical Sciences Evolution of Morphology of iPP in Processing Conditions
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Evolution of Morphology of iPP in Processing Conditions

Relevance of Solidification Pressure
  • , and
Published/Copyright: April 30, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A model for crystallization kinetics that accounts for the formation of different crystalline phases and is able to describe the morphological characteristics of samples solidified under quiescent conditions, has been enriched to account for the effect of solidification pressure. The effect of pressure was considered by assuming a linear increase of melting and glass transition temperatures (which are involved in the description of the growth rate and nucleation density of the alpha phase). Moreover, pressure was incorporated in the kinetic constant adopted to describe the evolution of the mesomorphic phase. The parameters of the model were identified on the basis of literature data on the distribution of crystalline phases in samples solidified under different pressures. The modified model also satisfactorily described PVT curves up to 100 MPa, and is now able to describe the evolution of morphology during solidification at cooling rates as fast as several hundreds of Kelvin degrees per second and under pressures of as high as 100 MPa.


Mail address: G. Titomanlio, Dept. of Chemical and Food Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Ponte don Melillo, I-84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy E-mail:

References

1 Coccorullo, I., Pantani, R., Titomanlio, G.: Polymer44 (1), p. 307 (2003).10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00762-0Search in Google Scholar

2 La Carrubba, V., Brucato, V., Piccarolo, S.: Polym. Eng. Sci.40 (11) p. 2430 (2000).10.1002/pen.11375Search in Google Scholar

3 Piccarolo, S., Alessi, S., Brucato, V., Titomanlio, G.: Crystallization Behavior at High Cooling Rates of two Polypropylene, in Crystallization of Polymers, NATO Advanced Research Workshop, Mons, Belgium (1992) and NATO ASI Series, Marcel Dosiere, The Netherlands Eds., Series C, Mathematical and Physical Science, p. 475 (1993).Search in Google Scholar

4 Hieber, C. A.: Int. Polym. Process12, p. 249 (1997).10.3139/217.970249Search in Google Scholar

5 Eder, G., Janeschitz-Kriegl, H.: Materials Science and Technology. Meijer, H. E. H. (Ed.), Wiley, New York (1997).Search in Google Scholar

6 Angelloz, C., Fulchiron, R., Douillard, A., Chabert, B., Fillit, R., Vautrin, A., David, L.: Macromolecules33, p. 4138 (2000).10.1021/ma991813eSearch in Google Scholar

7 Ito, H., Minagawa, K., Takimoto, J., Tada, K., Koyama, K.: Int. Polym. Process.11, p. 363 (1996).10.3139/217.960363Search in Google Scholar

8 Vittoria, V.: Properties of iPP, Handbook of Polymer Science and Technology (1989).Search in Google Scholar

9 Pantani, R., Titomanlio, G.: Journal of Applied Polymer Science vol.80, p. 267 (2001).10.1002/app.1438Search in Google Scholar

10 Watanabe, K., Sukuzi, T., Masubuchi, Y., Taniguchi, T., Takimoto, J., Koyama, K.: Polymer44, p. 5023 (2003).10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00604-9Search in Google Scholar

11 La Carrubba, V.: Ph.D. Thesis, Palermo (2000).Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2005-2-11
Accepted: 2005-2-15
Published Online: 2013-04-30
Published in Print: 2005-05-01

© 2005, Carl Hanser Verlag, Munich

Downloaded on 2.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/217.1877/html
Scroll to top button