Home Network Capability Configurations as a Catalyst for Competitive Advantage
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Network Capability Configurations as a Catalyst for Competitive Advantage

  • Karl Gerhard Schalm

    Karl Gerhard Schalm, M. Sc., born in 1996, studied industrial engineering with a specialization in mechanical engineering at RWTH Aachen University. He is a research associate at the Institute of Technology Management at the University of St.Gallen in the area of production management in the research group Global Production.

    EMAIL logo
    and Thomas Friedli

    Prof. Dr. Thomas Friedli, born in 1971, is a Professor of Business Administration in the field of Production Management and Director of the Institute of Technology Management at the University of St. Gallen. In addition to international manufacturing networks, his main research areas include operational excellence and smart services.

Published/Copyright: February 10, 2024

Abstract

Historically, manufacturing companies supplied world markets out of their home countries. Today, most of them rely on a network of globally spread plants. The benefits a network provides are summarized under the term network capabilities. It remains open, how a well-designed network can compensate the lack in competitive advantage in, e. g., quality or flexibility. This article sheds light on which configurations of network capabilities are worthwhile investing into under defined contingencies.

Abstract

In der Vergangenheit belieferten produzierende Unternehmen die Weltmärkte aus ihren Heimatländern, heute werden meist globale Netzwerke genutzt. Deren Vorteile werden unter dem Begriff Netzwerkfähigkeiten subsumiert. Offen bleibt, wie ein gut gestaltetes Netzwerk fehlende Wettbewerbsvorteile, wie z. B. bei Qualität oder Flexibilität, kompensieren kann. Dieser Beitrag beleuchtet, in welche Konfigurationen von Netzwerkfähigkeiten sich ein Investment unter bestimmten Voraussetzungen lohnt.


Note

This article is peer reviewed by the members of the ZWF Advisory Board.



Tel.: +41 71 224 73 05

About the authors

Karl Gerhard Schalm

Karl Gerhard Schalm, M. Sc., born in 1996, studied industrial engineering with a specialization in mechanical engineering at RWTH Aachen University. He is a research associate at the Institute of Technology Management at the University of St.Gallen in the area of production management in the research group Global Production.

Prof. Dr. Thomas Friedli

Prof. Dr. Thomas Friedli, born in 1971, is a Professor of Business Administration in the field of Production Management and Director of the Institute of Technology Management at the University of St. Gallen. In addition to international manufacturing networks, his main research areas include operational excellence and smart services.

Literature

1 Wheelwright, S.: Manufacturing Strategy: Defining the Missing Link. Strategic Management Journal 5 (1984) 1, pp. 77–91 DOI:10.1002/smj.425005010610.1002/smj.4250050106Search in Google Scholar

2 Skinner, W.: Manufacturing – Missing Link in Corporate Strategy. Harvard Business Review (1969) 3, pp. 136–145Search in Google Scholar

3 Shi, Y.; Gregory, M.: International Manufacturing Networks – To Develop Global Competitive Capabilities. Journal of Operations Management 16 (1998) 2/3, pp. 195–214 DOI:10.1016/S0272-6963(97)00038-710.1016/S0272-6963(97)00038-7Search in Google Scholar

4 Miltenburg, J.: Setting Manufacturing Strategy for a Company‘s International Manufacturing Network. International Journal of Production Research 47 (2009) 22, pp. 6179–6203 DOI:10.1080/0020754080212662910.1080/00207540802126629Search in Google Scholar

5 Skinner, C.: Management of International Production. Management of International Production 7 (1965) 1, pp. 20–22 DOI:10.1002/tie.506007011110.1002/tie.5060070111Search in Google Scholar

6 Eisenhardt, K.; Martin, J.: Dynamic Capabilities: What are They? Strategic Management Journal 21 (2000) 10-11, pp. 1105–1121 DOI:10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21: 10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21Search in Google Scholar

7 Barney, J.: Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management 17 (1991) 1, pp. 99–120 DOI:10.1177/01492063910170010810.1177/014920639101700108Search in Google Scholar

8 Teece, D.: Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strategic Management Journal 28 (2007) 13, pp. 1319–1350 DOI:10.1002/smj.64010.1002/smj.640Search in Google Scholar

9 Hayes, R.; Wheelwright, S.; Clark, K.: Dynamic Manufacturing – Creating the Learning Organization. Free Press, New York, NY 1988Search in Google Scholar

10 Colotla, I.; Shi, Y.; Gregory, M.: Operation and Performance of International Manufacturing Networks. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 23 (2003) 10, pp. 1184–1206 DOI:10.1108/0144357031049662510.1108/01443570310496625Search in Google Scholar

11 Friedli, T.; Mundt, A.; Thomas, S.: Strategic Management of Global Manufacturing Networks – Aligning Strategy, Configuration, and Coordination: Management for Professionals. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2014. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-34185-410.1007/978-3-642-34185-4Search in Google Scholar

12 Friedli, T.; Kaiser, J.; Miedler, P.; Helbling, J.; Schalm, K.: Benchmarking: Global Production Strategies. General Report, St.Gallen 2022Search in Google Scholar

13 Schalm, K.; Kaiser, J.; Friedli, T.: Globale Produktionsstrategien in der Praxis – Strategieformulierung und -implementierung: Empirische Erkenntnisse aus einer internationalen Benchmarkingstudie. ZWF 117 (2022) 12, pp. 805–812 DOI:10.1515/zwf-2022-116610.1515/zwf-2022-1166Search in Google Scholar

14 Ragin, C.: Redesigning Social Inquiry – Fuzzy Sets and beyond. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago 2008 DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226702797. 001.000110.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

15 Ragin, C.: The Comparative Method – Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA 1987.Search in Google Scholar

16 Mill, J.: A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. In: Boddice, R. (ed.): Scientific and Medical Knowledge Production. Volume IV: Uncertainty. Routledge, London 2023Search in Google Scholar

17 Ragin, C.: Fuzzy-set Social Science. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London 2000Search in Google Scholar

18 Pappas, I.; Woodside, A.: Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for Research Practice in Information Systems and Marketing. International Journal of Information Management 58 (2021), pp. 1–23 DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.10231010.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310Search in Google Scholar

19 Arellano, M.; Meuer, J.; Netland, T.: Commitment Follows Beliefs: A Configurational Perspective on Operations Managers‘ Commitment to Practice Adoption. Journal of Operations Management 67 (2021) 4, pp. 450–475 DOI:10.1002/joom.113010.1002/joom.1130Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2024-02-10
Published in Print: 2024-02-29

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zwf-2024-1006/html
Scroll to top button