Startseite Inquisition of micellar and surface active properties of gemini surfactants in the presence of a dipeptide
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Inquisition of micellar and surface active properties of gemini surfactants in the presence of a dipeptide

  • Jasmeet Kaur , Pooja Sharma , Gagandeep Kaur , Pamita Awasthi , Harsh Kumar und Ramanjeet Kaur EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 20. Juni 2023

Abstract

The influence of dipeptide glycyl-l-valine (gly-l-val) on the micellization and surface active properties of two different gemini surfactants varying in their spacer group i.e. ethylene-1,2-bis (N,N-dimethyl-N-dodecylammonium bromide) (12–2–12) and hexamethylene-1,6-bis-(N,N-dimethyl-N-dodecylammonium bromide) (12–6–12) was explored using tensiometry as well as conductivity technique. Conductivity measurements at several temperatures (293.15, 298.15, 303.15 and 308.15) K and tensiometric measurements at 298.15 K at several concentrations of dipeptide (0.02, 0.04 and 0.06) mol/kg were conducted so as to deduce the interactions amid dipeptide and two surfactants. Several parameters viz. critical micelle concentration (CMC) as well as the degree of ionization (α) along with various parameters associated with thermodynamics; standard entropy of micellization (ΔSm0), Gibbs free energy of micellization (ΔGm0) and standard enthalpy of micellization (ΔHm0) have been evaluated through conductivity data. Various additional thermodynamic parameters such as free energy of adsorption (ΔGad0) and surface free energy (Gmins) have been also estimated through surface tension measurements.


Corresponding author: Ramanjeet Kaur, Department of Chemistry, Dr B R Ambedkar National Institute of Technology, Jalandhar, 144011, Punjab, India, E-mail:
Harsh Kumar: Deceased.

Acknowledgment

Jasmeet Kaur, one of the authors, would like to express her gratitude to the Ministry of Education (MOE) and the Director and Head of the Chemistry Department at Dr. B.R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology.

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Conflict of interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

  3. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

References

1. Myers, D Surfactant Science and Technology; VCH: New Jersey, USA, 1946.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Porter, M Handbook of Surfactants, 2nd ed.; Chapman & Hall: USA, 1996.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Kumar, H., Kaur, G. Effect of changing alkyl chain in imidazolium based ionic liquid on the micellization behavior of anionic surfactant sodium hexadecyl sulfate in aqueous media. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2021, 42, 970–983. https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2020.1724796.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Basu Ray, G., Ghosh, S., Moulik, S. P. Physicochemical studies on the interfacial and bulk behaviors of sodium N-dodecanoyl sarcosinate (SDDS). J. Surfactants Deterg. 2009, 12, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11743-008-1105-3.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Šarac, B., Bester-Rogac, M. Temperature and salt-induced micellization of dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride in aqueous solution: a thermodynamic study. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2009, 338, 16–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2009.06.027.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Soni, S. S., Panjabi, S. H., Sastry, N. V. Effect of non-electrolyte additives on micellization and clouding behavior of silicone surfactant in aqueous solutions. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2011, 377, 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COLSURFA.2010.12.048.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Khimani, M., Vora, S. Effect of inorganic additives on a conventional anionic–nonionic mixed surfactants system in aqueous solution. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2011, 14, 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-011-1275-2.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Patil, T. J. Influence of additive on the micellar properties of nonionic surfactant. Res. J. Chem. Environ. 2011, 15, 209–211.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Dubey, N. Micellar properties and related thermodynamic parameters of aqueous anionic surfactants in the presence of monohydric alcohols. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2011, 56, 3291–3300. https://doi.org/10.1021/JE101358P.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Vaghela, N., Sastry, N., Aswal, V. Effect of additives on the surface active and morphological features of 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium halide aggregates in aqueous media. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2011, 373, 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.10.031.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Khan, I., Mohammad, R., Alam, M. S., Kabir, D. The interaction of cationic gemini surfactant 1,4-butanediyl-α,ω-bis (dimethylcetylammonium bromide) with primary linear alkanols. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2009, 31, 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/01932690903110160.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Mahajan, R. K., Shaheen, A., Vohra, K. K. Behavior of micellar properties of zwitterionic surfactants in the presence of glycol additives: cyclic voltammetry, fluorescence and viscosity measurements. Z. Phys. Chem. 2009, 223, 753–767. https://doi.org/10.1524/ZPCH.2009.5419/HTML.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Li, J., Bai, D., Chen, B. H. Effects of additives on the cloud points of selected nonionic linear ethoxylated alcohol surfactants. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2009, 346, 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.06.020.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Myers, D. Surfactant Science and Technology; VCH: New York, 1992.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Zana, R. Dimeric and oligomeric surfactants. Behavior at interfaces and in aqueous solution: a review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 97, 205–253. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420028225/DYNAMICS-SURFACTANT-SELF-ASSEMBLIES-RAOUL-ZANA.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Akram, M., Kumar, D. Catalytic effect of CTAB on the interaction of dipeptide glycyl-tyrosine (Gly-Tyr) with ninhydrin. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2014, 18, 520–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSCS.2011.10.019.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Von Hippel, P., Schleich, T. Structure and Stability of Biological Macromolecules; Marcel Deckker: New York, 1969.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Yan, Z., Li, Y., Wang, X., Dan, Z., Wang, J. Effect of glycyl dipeptides on the micellar behavior of gemini surfactant: a conductometric and fluorescence spectroscopic study. J. Mol. Liq. 2011, 161, 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLLIQ.2011.04.009.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Jencks, W. Catalysis in Chemistry and Enzymology; McGraw Hill: New York, 1969.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Mazur, K., Heisler, I. A., Meech, S. R. Ultrafast dynamics and hydrogen-bond structure in aqueous solutions of model peptides. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 10684–10691. https://doi.org/10.1021/JP106423A/SUPPL_FILE/JP106423A_SI_001.PDF.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Kumar, H., Kaur, J., Awasthi, P. Investigation of aggregation and surface active properties of cationic gemini surfactants in the presence of antidepressant drug. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 641, 128539; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128539.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Wu, Y. C., Koch, W. F., Pratt, K. W. Proposed new electrolytic conductivity primary standards for KCl solutions. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 1991, 96, 191. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.096.008.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Agarwal, V., Gupta, V., Bhardwaj, V. K., Singh, K., Khullar, P., Bakshi, M. S. Avoiding hemolytic anemia by understanding the effect of the molecular architecture of gemini surfactants on hemolysis. Langmuir 2021, 37, 3709–3720. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c00154.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Chavda, S., Bahadur, P., Aswal, V. K. Interaction between nonionic and gemini (cationic) surfactants: effect of spacer chain length. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2011, 14, 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-011-1263-6.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Wang, X., Wang, J., Wang, Y., Yan, H., Li, P., Thomas, R. K. Effect of the nature of the spacer on the aggregation properties of gemini surfactants in an aqueous solution. Langmui 2004, 20, 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1021/LA0351008.Suche in Google Scholar

26. Bakshi, M. S., Singh, J., Kaur, G. Fluorescence study of solubilization of L-α-dilauroylphosphatidylethanolamine in the mixed micelles with monomeric and dimeric cationic surfactants. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2005, 73, 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2005.02.005.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Yan, Z., Li, Y., Wang, X., Dan, J., Wang, J. Effect of glycyl dipeptides on the micellar behavior of gemini surfactant: a conductometric and fluorescence spectroscopic study. J. Mol. Liq. 2011, 161, 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2011.04.009.Suche in Google Scholar

28. Kresheck, G. C., Franks, F. Surfactants. In Water a Comprehensive Treatise; Springer US, Plenum: New York, 1975.10.1007/978-1-4684-2958-9_2Suche in Google Scholar

29. Meguro, K., Takasawa, Y., Kawahashi, N., Tabata, Y., Ueono, N. Micellar properties of a series of octaethyleneglycol-n-alkyl ethers with homogeneous ethylene oxide chain and their temperature dependence. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1981, 83, 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(81)90008-4.Suche in Google Scholar

30. Carnero Ruiz, C., Díaz-López, L., Aguiar, J. Self-assembly of tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide in glycerol aqueous mixtures: a thermodynamic and structural study. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 305, 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2006.09.074.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Tanford, C. Theory of micelle formation in aqueous solutions. J. Phys. Chem. 1974, 78, 2469–2479. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100617a012.Suche in Google Scholar

32. Engin Özdil, S., Akbaş, H., Boz, M. Synthesis and physicochemical properties of double-chain cationic surfactants. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2016, 61, 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.JCED.5B00367.Suche in Google Scholar

33. Khan, A., Shah, S. A UV-visible study of partitioning of pyrene in an anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2008, 29, 1401–1407. https://doi.org/10.1080/01932690802313246.Suche in Google Scholar

34. Mehta, S. K., Bhasin, K. K., Chauhan, R., Dham, S. Effect of temperature on critical micelle concentration and thermodynamic behavior of dodecyldimethylethylammonium bromide and dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride in aqueous media. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2005, 255, 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COLSURFA.2004.12.038.Suche in Google Scholar

35. Kumar, H., Kaur, R. Exploration of the soluting-out effect of carbohydrates on the micellization and surface activity of long-chain imidazolium ionic liquid in the aqueous medium. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 319, 114209; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.114209.Suche in Google Scholar

36. Ali, M. S., Suhail, M., Ghosh, G., Kamil, M. Interactions between cationic gemini/conventional surfactants with polyvinylpyrrolidone: specific conductivity and dynamic light scattering studies. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2009, 350, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.08.033.Suche in Google Scholar

37. Nusselder, J. J. H. Engberts JBFN toward a better understanding of the driving force for micelle formation and micellar growth. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1992, 148, 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(92)90174-K.Suche in Google Scholar

38. Chauhan, S., Kaur, M., Kumar, K., Chauhan, M. S. Study of the effect of electrolyte and temperature on the critical micelle concentration of dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide in aqueous medium. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2014, 78, 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCT.2014.07.003.Suche in Google Scholar

39. Prasad, M., Chakraborty, I., Rakshit, A. K., Moulik, S. P. Critical evaluation of micellization behavior of nonionic surfactant MEGA 10 in comparison with ionic surfactant tetradecyltriphenylphosphonium bromide studied by microcalorimetric method in aqueous medium. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 9815–9821. https://doi.org/10.1021/JP057442N.Suche in Google Scholar

40. Chauhan, S., Singh, R., Sharma, K., Kumar, K. Interaction study of anionic surfactant with aqueous non-ionic polymers from conductivity, density and speed of sound measurements. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2015, 18, 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11743-014-1613-2.Suche in Google Scholar

41. Chattoraj, D. Adsorption and the Gibbs Surface Excess; Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.Suche in Google Scholar

42. Chauhan, S., Sharma, V., Sharma, K. Maltodextrin-SDS interactions: volumetric, viscometric and surface tension study. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2013, 354, 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2013.06.051.Suche in Google Scholar

43. Clint, J. Surfactant aggregation; Springer Science & Business Media: New York, 2012.Suche in Google Scholar

44. Zhou, Q., Rosen, M. J. Molecular interactions of surfactants in mixed monolayers at the air/aqueous solution interface and in mixed micelles in aqueous media: the regular solution approach. Langmuir 2003, 19, 4555–4562. https://doi.org/10.1021/LA020789M.Suche in Google Scholar

45. Chakraborty, T., Ghosh, S., Moulik, S. P. Micellization and related behavior of binary and ternary surfactant mixtures in aqueous medium: cetyl pyridinium chloride (CPC), Cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB), and polyoxyethylene (10) cetyl ether (Brij-56) derived system. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 14813–14823. https://doi.org/10.1021/JP044580O.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

46. Carnero Ruiz, C., Hierrezuelo, J. M., Molina-Bolívar, J. A. Effect of glycine on the surface activity and micellar properties of N-decanoyl-N -methylglucamide. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2008, 286, 1281–1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00396-008-1893-Z.Suche in Google Scholar

47. Rosen, M. J. Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2004.10.1002/0471670561Suche in Google Scholar

48. Mukerjee, P. The nature of the association equilibria and hydrophobic bonding in aqueous solutions of association colloids. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 1967, 1, 242–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8686(67)80005-8.Suche in Google Scholar

49. Sekine, T., Kojima, K., Sasaki, S., Matsumoto, T., Yamamoto, T., Maitani, Y., Nagai, T. Evaluation of antibacterial effect of shikonin ointment against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. STP Pharma Sci. 1998, 8, 255–259.Suche in Google Scholar

50. Ko, J.-S., Oh, S.-W., Kim, Y.-S., Nakashima, N., Nagadome, S., Sugihara, G. Adsorption and micelle formation of mixed surfactant systems in water. IV. Three combinations of SDS with MEGA-8, -9 and -10. J. Oleo Sci. 2004, 53, 109–126. https://doi.org/10.5650/JOS.53.109.Suche in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/znb-2023-0035).


Received: 2023-04-25
Accepted: 2023-05-26
Published Online: 2023-06-20
Published in Print: 2023-08-28

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 21.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zpch-2023-0247/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen