Startseite Effect of zero penetration angle chevrons in supersonic jet noise and screech tone mitigation
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Effect of zero penetration angle chevrons in supersonic jet noise and screech tone mitigation

  • Kaleeswaran Periyasamy , Kadiresh P. Natarajan EMAIL logo , Bogadi Surendra und Khandai Suresh Chandra
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 17. April 2023
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

An experimental study is conducted to determine the effect of chevrons with zero penetration angles at the CD nozzle exit on an emitted noise field. The implication of passive control is to reduce the blockage of the nozzle exit area with minimal engine thrust penalty. The cold air jets issued at design Mach numbers 1.5 and 1.75 from the De Laval nozzles of the circular section were investigated. This passive control eliminates screech tones at the over and ideally expanded conditions at 60° and 90° in the azimuth plane. The acoustic data measurements have also been observed for the chosen jet Mach numbers. The schlieren images reveal the shock cell pattern to eliminate the effect of shock-associated noise levels at supersonic jets. The results show that 10 chevrons with no penetration act as an effective eliminator of screech tone and noise suppression average ∆OASPL value up to 3 dB at Mach number 1.75.


Corresponding author: Kadiresh P. Natarajan, Department of Aerospace Engineering, B S Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, Vandalur, Chennai 600048, India, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Waitz, IA, Lukachko, SP, Lee, JJ. Military aviation and the environment: historical trends and comparison to civil aviation. J Aircraft 2005;42:329–39. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.6888.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Barbot, B, Lavandier, C, Cheminée, P. Perceptual representation of aircraft sounds. Appl Acoust 2008;69:1003–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2007.07.001.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Tarabini, M, Moschioni, G, Asensio, C, Bianchi, D, Saggin, B. Unattended acoustic events classification at the vicinity of airports. Appl Acoust 2014;84:91–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.03.013.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Tam, CKW. The shock-cell structures and screech tone frequencies of rectangular and non-axisymmetric supersonic jets. J Sound Vib 1988;121:135–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(88)80066-X.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Powell, A. On the mechanism of choked jet noise. Proc Phys Soc B 1953;66:1039–56. https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1301/66/12/306.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Tam, CKW. Supersonic jet noise. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 1995;27:17–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.27.010195.000313.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Faheem, M, Khan, A, Kumar, R, Khan, SA, Asrar, W, Sapardi, AM. Experimental study on the mean flow characteristics of a supersonic multiple jet configuration. Aero Sci Technol 2021;108:106377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106377.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Morris, P, McLaughlin, D, Sparrow, V, Bridges, J, Henderson, B, Plotkin, K, et al.. Final report WP-1583, strategic environmental research and development program. Pennsylvania: Penn State University; 2011:1–191 pp.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Jawahar, HK, Meloni, S, Camussi, R. Jet noise sources for chevron nozzles in under-expanded condition. Int J Aeroacoustics 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475472X221101766.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Arroyo, CP, Moreau, S. Azimuthal mode analysis of broadband shock-associated noise in an under-expanded axisymmetric jet. J Sound Vib 2019;449:64–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2019.02.032.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Harper-Bourne, M, Fisher, MJ. The noise from shock waves in supersonic jets. In: Agard-Cp-131; 1973, vol 11:1–13 pp.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Tanna, HK. An experimental study of jet noise part II: shock associated noise. J Sound Vib 1977;50:429–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(77)90494-1.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Norum, TD. Screech suppression in supersonic jets. AIAA J 1983;21:235–40. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.8059.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Raman, G. Cessation of screech in under-expanded jets. In: 2nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics conf.; 1996.10.2514/6.1996-1719Suche in Google Scholar

15. Raman, G. Supersonic jet screech: half-century from Powell to the present. J Sound Vib 1999;225:543–71. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1999.2181.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Kandula, M. Shock-refracted acoustic wave model for screech amplitude in supersonic jets. AIAA J 2008;46:682–9. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.30913.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Kong, FS, Kim, HD, Jin, Y, Setoguchi, T. Application of Chevron nozzle to a supersonic ejector-diffuser system. Procedia Eng 2013;56:193–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.107.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Balusamy, S, Rajendran, V, A, MA, Sankar, V, Kumar, VS. In silico and in vitro experiments on chevron nozzles with enhanced momentum thrust using streamtube expansion waves. In: AIAA propulsion and energy 2021 forum. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2021. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-3357.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Heeb, N, Gutmark, E, Liu, J, Kailasanath, K. Fluidically enhanced chevrons for supersonic jet noise reduction. AIAA J 2014;52:799–809. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052508.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Heeb, N, Kastner, J, Gutmark, E, Kailasanath, K. Supersonic jet noise reduction by chevrons and fluidic injection. Int J Aeroacoustics 2013;12:679–98. https://doi.org/10.1260/1475-472X.12.7-8.679.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Seiner, JM, Ukeiley, LS, Jansen, BJ. Aero-performance efficient noise reduction for the F404-400 engine. In: Collect. tech. pap. – 11th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics conf.; 2005, vol 5:3074–86 pp.10.2514/6.2005-3048Suche in Google Scholar

22. Nastase, I, Meslem, A. Vortex dynamics and mass entrainment in turbulent lobed jets with and without lobe deflection angles. Exp Fluid 2010;48:693–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0762-y.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Rao, SMV, Karthick, SK, Anand, A. Elliptic supersonic jet morphology manipulation using sharp-tipped lobes. Phys Fluids 2020;32:086107. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0015035.Suche in Google Scholar

24. Mohan, NKD, Dowling, AP. Jet-noise-prediction model for chevrons and microjets. AIAA J 2016;54:3928–40. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J054546.Suche in Google Scholar

25. McLaughlin, DK, Morris, PJ, Martens, S, Lariviere, EL. Extending on-demand noise reduction to industry-scale models for tactical aircraft. In: 22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics conf. 2016; 2016:1–14 pp.10.2514/6.2016-2990Suche in Google Scholar

26. Callender, B, Gutmark, E, Martens, S. Far-field acoustic investigation into chevron nozzle mechanisms and trends. AIAA J 2005;43:87–95. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.6150.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Callender, B, Gutmark, E, Martens, S. Near-field investigation of chevron nozzle mechanisms. AIAA J 2008;46:36–45. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.17720.Suche in Google Scholar

28. Humphrey, NJ, Edgington-Mitchell, D. The effect of low lobe count chevron nozzles on supersonic jet screech. Int J Aeroacoustics 2016;15:294–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475472X16630872.Suche in Google Scholar

29. Heeb, N, Gutmark, E, Kailasanath, K. Impact of chevron spacing and asymmetric distribution on supersonic jet acoustics and flow. J Sound Vib 2016;370:54–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2016.01.047.Suche in Google Scholar

30. Kantola, RA. Noise characteristics of heated high velocity rectangular jets. J Sound Vib 1979;64:277–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(79)90652-7.Suche in Google Scholar

31. Samimy, M, Zaman, KBMQ, Reeder, MF. Effect of tabs on the flow and noise field of an axisymmetrie jet. AIAA J 1993;31:609–19. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11594.Suche in Google Scholar

32. Goss, AE, Veltin, J, Lee, J, McLaughlin, DK. Acoustic measurements of high-speed jets from rectangular nozzle with thrust vectoring. AIAA J 2009;47:1482–90. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.39843.Suche in Google Scholar

33. André, B, Castelain, T, Bailly, C. Broadband shock-associated noise in screeching and non-screeching underexpanded supersonic jets. AIAA J 2013;51:665–73. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052058.Suche in Google Scholar

34. Kinzie, K, Martens, S, McLaughlin, D. Supersonic elliptic jet noise – experiments with and without an ejector shroud. In: 15th Aeroacoustics Conference, 25–27 October 1993, Long Beach, CA, U.S.A.; 1993.https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1993-4349.Suche in Google Scholar

35. Morris, PJ, McLaughlin, DK. Noise and noise reduction in supersonic jets. In: Flinovia—flow induced noise and vibration issues and aspects-II. Springer International Publishing; 2018:85–96 pp.10.1007/978-3-319-76780-2_6Suche in Google Scholar

36. Rahmani, S, Alhawwary, M, Wang, Z, Phommachanh, J, Hill, C, Hartwell, BD, et al.. Noise mitigation of a supersonic jet using shear layer swirl. In: AIAA scitech 2020 forum; 2020, vol. 1:1–30 pp.10.2514/6.2020-0499Suche in Google Scholar

37. Bogadi, S, Sridhar, BTN. Acoustic characteristics of supersonic rectangular jets issuing from nozzles with diagonal expansion ramps. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng 2021;43:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03286-w.Suche in Google Scholar

38. Powers, RW, Kuo, CW, McLaughlin, DK. Experimental comparison of supersonic jets exhausting from military style nozzles with interior corrugations and fluidic inserts. In: 19th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics conf.; 2013:180 p.10.2514/6.2013-2186Suche in Google Scholar

39. Tide, PS, Babu, V. Numerical predictions of noise due to subsonic jets from nozzles with and without chevrons. Appl Acoust 2009;70:321–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2008.03.006.Suche in Google Scholar

40. Bridges, J, Brown, CA. Parametric testing of chevrons on single flow hot jets. In: Collect. tech. pap. – 10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics conf.; 2004, vol 1:284–300 pp.10.2514/6.2004-2824Suche in Google Scholar

41. Tam, CKW, Seiner, JM, Yu, JC. Proposed relationship between broadband shock associated noise and screech tones. J Sound Vib 1986;110:309–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(86)80212-7.Suche in Google Scholar

42. Munday, D, Heeb, N, Gutmark, E, Liu, J, Kailasanath, K. Supersonic jet noise reduction technologies for gas turbine engines. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2011;133:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002914.Suche in Google Scholar

43. Munday, D, Heeb, N, Gutmark, E, Liu, J, Kailasanath, K. Acoustic effect of chevrons on supersonic jets exiting conical convergent-divergent nozzles. AIAA J 2012;50:2336–50. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J051337.Suche in Google Scholar

44. Norum, T, Seiner, J. Location and propagation of shock associated noise from supersonic jets. In: 6th Aeroacoustics conference, 4–6 June 1980. CT, U.S.A.: Hartford; 1980. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1980-983.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-11-07
Accepted: 2023-04-01
Published Online: 2023-04-17
Published in Print: 2024-05-27

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Numerical investigations of heat transfer characteristics using oblong fins and circular fins in a wedge channel
  3. An efficient flow control technique based on co-flow jet and multi-stage slot circulation control applied to a supercritical airfoil
  4. Reacting flow analysis in scramjet engine: effect of mass flow rate of fuel and flight velocity
  5. Installed performance seeking control based on supersonic variable inlet/engine coupling model
  6. Effect of zero penetration angle chevrons in supersonic jet noise and screech tone mitigation
  7. The aerodynamic performance degradation analysis of a small high bypass turbofan engine compression system with fan rotor blade leading edge erosion
  8. Flow structure comparison of film cooling versus hybrid cooling: a CFD study
  9. Experimental investigation on a Jeffcott rotor with combined coupling misalignment using time-frequency analysis
  10. Effect of free boundary on the performance of single expansion nozzle
  11. Optimization and numerical investigation of combined design of blade and endwall on rotor 67
  12. Numerical study on the effect of distortion of S-duct on flow field and performance of a full annulus transonic fan
  13. Research on a high-precision real-time improvement method for aero-engine component-level model
  14. Uncertainty quantification by probabilistic analysis of circular fins
  15. Influences of unbalance phase combination on the dynamic characteristics for a turboprop engine
  16. Study on the water ingestion performance of compressor with inlet particle separator
  17. The role of volume effect on the transient behavior of a transonic compressor
  18. Experimental analysis of performance and tip dynamic pressure in a compressor cascade with high-speed moving endwall
  19. Numerical study of the impact of hydrogen addition, swirl intensity and equivalence ratio on methane-air combustion
  20. Active subspace-based performance analysis of supersonic through-flow fan rotor
  21. Assessment of performance degradation of a mixed flow low bypass turbofan engine through GasTurb simulation
  22. Numerical investigation of tip clearance flow in a variable geometry turbine with non-uniform partial clearance
Heruntergeladen am 6.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2022-0073/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen