Home Linguistics & Semiotics The dichotomy of society and urban space configuration in producing the semiotic structure of the modernism urban fabric
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The dichotomy of society and urban space configuration in producing the semiotic structure of the modernism urban fabric

  • Mustafa Aziz Amen EMAIL logo and Hourakhsh Ahmad Nia
Published/Copyright: April 25, 2018

Abstract

Urban space organization associates with specific characteristics in the transformation of society’s behavior and views; it is composed of principles of dichotomy that work as a system of signs to transfer meaning with conventional interpretation. The urban fabric as a context is full of signifiers that tend to convey a meaning implicitly carved in its space organization system. Therefore, it is not just a simple physical configuration. Instead, it is a translation of human experiences with the different synchronic architectural characteristics that needs a critical examination to segregate discrete layers of structural elements. The association is so prevailing that each portion has a significant role in creating a combination of mental prototypes of interpretation between the different factors that give the urban space its final form. The study aims to find the internal signs system within urban space organization that is a combination of signs that represents the aesthetic values of space. The study aimed to explore implicit space organization to make out what is internally powerful to work as aesthetic signs of urban space organization. We conclude that there is a difference as a result of intervening new concepts in the urban space organization without taking in account the existing sign system. This difference could be a source of misunderstanding and confusion in the space organization system and needs understanding and restructuring through the development of procedures.

References

Adorno, T. W. 2002. Aesthetic theory. London & New York: Continuum Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ballantyne, A. 2004. Architectures: Modernism and after. Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470774229Search in Google Scholar

Benevolo, L. 1977. History of modern architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Carmona, M., T. Heath, T. Oc & S. Tiesdell. 2003. Public places, urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design. Oxford, UK: Architectural Press.Search in Google Scholar

Castello, L. 2010. Rethinking the meaning: Conceiving place in architecture-urbanism. Surrey: Ashgate press.Search in Google Scholar

Chandler, D. 2007. Semiotics: The basics. Oxon: Rutledge.10.4324/9780203014936Search in Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. 1990. Postscript on the societies of control. In S. Thornham, C. Bassett & P. Marris (eds.), Media studies: A reader, 89–84. New York: New York University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Flanagan, W. G. 2010. Urban sociology: Images and structure. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar

Heynen, H. 1999. Architecture and modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hillier, B & J. Hanson. 2009. The social logic of space. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hvattum, M. & C. Hermansen (eds.). 2004. Tracing modernity. London: Rutledge.10.4324/9780203634745Search in Google Scholar

Innis, R. E. 1985. Semiotics: An introductory anthology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Karl, F. R. 1985. Modern and modernism: The sovereignty of the artist 1885–1925. New York: Athenum Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lawson, B. 2001. The language of space. Oxford: Architectural Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lefaivre, L. & A. Tzonis. 2004. The emergence of modern architecture: a documentary history from 1000 to 1810. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203380512Search in Google Scholar

Maciocco, G. 2009. People and space. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-9879-6Search in Google Scholar

Mallgrave, H. F. 2005. Modern architectural theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511497728Search in Google Scholar

Martin, B. & F. Ringham. 2000. Dictionary of semiotics. London: Cassell.Search in Google Scholar

Merrell, F. 1997. Peirce, signs, and meaning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442678330Search in Google Scholar

Metro-Roland, M. M. 2011. Tourists, signs, and the city: New directions in tourism analysis. Farnham: Ashgate Press.Search in Google Scholar

Outman, J. L. & E. M. Outman. 2003. Industrial revolution: The primary source. London: Thomson Press.Search in Google Scholar

Parmentier, R. J. 1994. Signs in society: Studies in semiotic anthropology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pevsner, N. 1968. The sources of modern architecture and design. New York: Frederick A. Praeger Press.Search in Google Scholar

Panerai, P., J. Castex & J. J. Depaule. 2004. Urban forms: The death and life of the urban block. Oxford: Architectural Press.Search in Google Scholar

Preucel, R. W. 2006. Archaeological semiotics. Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470754962Search in Google Scholar

Rodwin, L. 1981. Cities and city planning. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4684-1089-1Search in Google Scholar

Stanilov, K. 2007. The post-socialist city: Urban form and space transformations in central and eastern Europe after socialism. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6053-3Search in Google Scholar

Tyson, L. 2006. Critical theory today: A user-friendly guide. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Waldrep, S. 2003. The dissolution of place architecture, identity, and the body. Surrey: Ashgate Press.Search in Google Scholar

Winters, E. 2007. Aesthetics and architecture. New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-4-25
Published in Print: 2018-4-25

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Intrasemiotic translation in the emulations of ancient art: On the example of the collections of the University of Tartu Art Museum
  3. Groupuscular identity-creation in online-communication of the Estonian extreme right
  4. Bilingual representation of distance in visual-verbal sign systems: A case study of Guo Xi’s Early Spring
  5. Semeiotic logic or, deduction, induction, and semeiotic
  6. A conversation analytic study of error correction outside of the second language classroom
  7. Sensory representation in literature
  8. Differentiated non-differentiation: A diagrammatical approach to the trialectics of difference – from mono-dialectics to mono-trialectics
  9. Narcoculture? Narco-trafficking as a semiosphere of anticulture
  10. Interpretant, pure rhetoric, and semiotics of poetry
  11. Spatial composition as intersemiotic translation: The journey of a pattern through time from a translation semiotics theory perspective
  12. The dichotomy of society and urban space configuration in producing the semiotic structure of the modernism urban fabric
  13. Finite cognition and finite semiosis: A new perspective on semiotics for the information age
  14. Necrosemiosis: The CSI effect
  15. Semiotic resources for navigation: A video ethnographic study of blind people’s uses of the white cane and a guide dog for navigating in urban areas
  16. Borges, Pierre Menard, rhizomaticity, and the simulation of palimpsestic writing
  17. Shaken and stirred: Social representations, social media, and community empowerment in emergency contexts
  18. A Peircean epistemology of metaphor
Downloaded on 16.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2016-0141/html
Scroll to top button