Home Sensory representation in literature
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Sensory representation in literature

  • Frank Nuessel EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 25, 2018

Abstract

The five senses (vision, audition, touch, olfaction, gustation) constitute the essence of our ability to interact with the external world and make sense of it. This contact is transmitted through various sensory organs and the information for each sense is transmitted to and translated in various parts of the brain. The anatomical and physiological aspects of this external-internal interface are complex. Likewise, the philosophical approaches to this world-body communication and comprehension involves at least two perspectives, namely, the rationalist viewpoint (perception is brain-determined) and empirical (perception is externally acquired). This essay discusses how creative writers re-create sensory experience in their texts. It will examine each of the five senses and the strategies employed by authors to stimulate and arouse memories of previous reader experience both synchronically and diachronically. Writer and reader co-create and co-participate in this process.

References

Atwood, Margaret. 1996. Alias Grace. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.Search in Google Scholar

Bandler, Richard & John Grinder. 1975. The structure of magic. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior.Search in Google Scholar

The brain and the five senses-slideshare. 2009. Brain and five senses. http://www.slideshare.net/allaine/brain-and-five-senses (accessed 20 June 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Chapman, Raymond. 1982. The language of English literature. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Danesi, Marcel. 2013. Writing. in Marcel Danesi (ed.), Encyclopedia of media and communication, 719–721. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442695528Search in Google Scholar

Diaconu, Mădălina. 2006. Reflections on an aesthetics of touch, smell, and taste. Contemporary Aesthetics (4). https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/ca/7523862.0004.008/--reflections-on-an-aesthetics-of-touch-smell-and-taste?rgn=main;view=fulltext (accessed 27 February 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, Michael. 2008. Fragrances of the world. Sydney: Crescent.Search in Google Scholar

Elman, Richard. 1991. Tar beach. Los Angeles, CA: Sun & Moon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grinder, John & Richard Bandler. 1976. The structure of magic II. Palo Alto, CA: Science & Behavior.Search in Google Scholar

House of Wax. 1953. Director André de Toth. Warner Brothers Studio. 1953. Warner Home Video. 2003. DVD.Search in Google Scholar

Jenner, Mark S. R. 2011. Follow the nose? Smell, smelling, and their histories. American Historical Review 116(2). 335–351.10.1086/ahr.116.2.335Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lanchester, John. 1996. The debt to pleasure. New York: Henry Holt.Search in Google Scholar

Lehrer, Adrienne. 1983. Wine & conversation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lehrer, Adrienne 2009. Wine & conversation, 2nd edn Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195307931.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Nuessel, Frank. 1982. Eye dialect in Spanish: Some pedagogical applications. Hispania 65(3). 346–352.10.2307/341268Search in Google Scholar

Nuessel, Frank. 1997. A linguistic analysis of the Puerto Rican dialect of Spanish in René Marqués’s La carreta. In Robert M. Hammond & Marguerite MacDonald (eds.), Linguistic studies in honor of Bohdan Saciuk, 189–199. West Lafayette, in Learning Systems.Search in Google Scholar

Nuessel, Frank. 2006. Pictography. in Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics 2nd. vol. 9. 591–599. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01462-0Search in Google Scholar

Nuessel, Frank. 2015. Deviant orthography. in Peter Trifonas (ed.), International handbook of semiotics, 291–301. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.10.1007/978-94-017-9404-6_12Search in Google Scholar

Page, Norman. 1988. Speech in the English novel, 2nd edn. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.10.1007/978-1-349-19047-8Search in Google Scholar

Santanu, Das. 2005. Touch and intimacy in first world war literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

The Scent of Mystery. 1960. Director Jack Cardiff. Redwind Productions, Inc. DVD.Search in Google Scholar

Selden, Roman, Peter Widdowson & Pierre Brooker. 1997. A reader’s guide to contemporary literary theory, 4th edn Essex: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Shaw, George Bernard. 1975 [1913]. Pygmalion. New York: Signet.Search in Google Scholar

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2015. The problems of perception. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/perception-problem/. (accessed 21 June 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Stano, Simona (ed.). 2016. Semiotics of food. Special issue. Semiotica 211(1/4). 19–26.10.1515/sem-2016-0095Search in Google Scholar

Süskind, Peter. 2013 [1985]. Perfume: The story of a murderer. John E. Woods (trans.). New York: Alfred Knopf.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-4-25
Published in Print: 2018-4-25

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Intrasemiotic translation in the emulations of ancient art: On the example of the collections of the University of Tartu Art Museum
  3. Groupuscular identity-creation in online-communication of the Estonian extreme right
  4. Bilingual representation of distance in visual-verbal sign systems: A case study of Guo Xi’s Early Spring
  5. Semeiotic logic or, deduction, induction, and semeiotic
  6. A conversation analytic study of error correction outside of the second language classroom
  7. Sensory representation in literature
  8. Differentiated non-differentiation: A diagrammatical approach to the trialectics of difference – from mono-dialectics to mono-trialectics
  9. Narcoculture? Narco-trafficking as a semiosphere of anticulture
  10. Interpretant, pure rhetoric, and semiotics of poetry
  11. Spatial composition as intersemiotic translation: The journey of a pattern through time from a translation semiotics theory perspective
  12. The dichotomy of society and urban space configuration in producing the semiotic structure of the modernism urban fabric
  13. Finite cognition and finite semiosis: A new perspective on semiotics for the information age
  14. Necrosemiosis: The CSI effect
  15. Semiotic resources for navigation: A video ethnographic study of blind people’s uses of the white cane and a guide dog for navigating in urban areas
  16. Borges, Pierre Menard, rhizomaticity, and the simulation of palimpsestic writing
  17. Shaken and stirred: Social representations, social media, and community empowerment in emergency contexts
  18. A Peircean epistemology of metaphor
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2016-0200/html
Scroll to top button