Abstract
This paper aims to look at the dialogical character of sign in Peirce, particularly with an emotional-volitional aspect of action-sign to discern how human subjects act and control themselves by virtue of symbolic mediation, representing the dialogic relation of sign. I thus examine the concept of the Peircean symbol as Thirdness, a mediator, and a genuine sign on three levels: expression, representation, interpretation. First, symbol expresses a Quality of dialogical relation between two qualities. Second, symbol represents a dialogical relation between icon being endowed with an internal character and index being endowed with a relative character, so that the symbol represents the indexical relation of the two. Third, symbol interprets the dialogical relation, which has another name of “genuine” symbol with a logical interpretant functioning as interpretative representation. In this way, symbolic mediation is incorporated with dialogic sign relation so as to attain a triadic meaning of action in self-control, thus leading to self-identity and truth. I attempt to show these characteristics of symbolic mediation by means of cinema image as metaphoric mediator, while discussing esthetic experience of the viewer.
Funding statement: Funding: This work was supported by Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Research Fund for 2015.
References
Ayyar, Akilesh. 2014. To express it is to explain. Philosophy Now 100. https://philosophynow.org/issues/100/To_Express_It_Is_To_Explain_It (accessed 12 October 2014).Search in Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The dialogic imagination: Four essays, Michael, Holquist (ed.), Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist (trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur C. 2013. What art is. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 2008 [1964]. Proust and signs, Richard Howard (trans.). Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
de Waal, Cornelis. 2013. Peirce: A guide for the perplexed. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar
Ehrat, Johannes. 2005. Cinema and semiotic: Peirce and film a esthetics, narration, and representation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442672956Search in Google Scholar
Haley, Michael Cabot. 1988. The semeiosis of poetic metaphor. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1983. What is enlightenment?In Perceptual peace and other essays, Ted Humphrey (trans.), 41–49. Indianapolis: Hackett.Search in Google Scholar
Liszka, James. 1996. A general introduction to the semeiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Mladenov, Ivan. 2006. Conceptualizing metaphors: On Charles Peirce’s marginalia. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203008218Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P. & Burks, A. W. (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.]Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S.. 1998. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2 (1893–1913), Peirce Edition Project (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 2 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 2.]Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Uninstantiability
- The meaning creation process, information, emotion, knowledge, two objects, and significance-effects: Some Peircean remarks
- General Semiotics (GS) as the all-round interdisciplinary organizer: GS versus philosophical fundamentalism
- Wittgenstein’s persuasive rhetoric
- An ideological content analysis of corporate manifestos: A foundational document approach
- Rhetorical transformation in Estonian political discourse during World War II
- Language as a complex algebra: Post-structuralism and inflectional morphology in Saussure’s Cours
- A semiotics of creativity and a poetic metaphor: Towards a dialogical relation of expression and explanation
- Dialogical sign and symbolic mediation: A quest for meaning and esthetic experience
- Towards a semiotic definition of discourse and a basis for a typology of discourses
- Defamation case law in Hong Kong: A corpus-based study
- Three Korean literati paintings of an orchid in the deconstructive process
- “Money. Armed. Quietly”: An analysis of criminogenic prose in institutional holdup notes
- Semiosis du corps dans la littérature sexologique arabe
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Uninstantiability
- The meaning creation process, information, emotion, knowledge, two objects, and significance-effects: Some Peircean remarks
- General Semiotics (GS) as the all-round interdisciplinary organizer: GS versus philosophical fundamentalism
- Wittgenstein’s persuasive rhetoric
- An ideological content analysis of corporate manifestos: A foundational document approach
- Rhetorical transformation in Estonian political discourse during World War II
- Language as a complex algebra: Post-structuralism and inflectional morphology in Saussure’s Cours
- A semiotics of creativity and a poetic metaphor: Towards a dialogical relation of expression and explanation
- Dialogical sign and symbolic mediation: A quest for meaning and esthetic experience
- Towards a semiotic definition of discourse and a basis for a typology of discourses
- Defamation case law in Hong Kong: A corpus-based study
- Three Korean literati paintings of an orchid in the deconstructive process
- “Money. Armed. Quietly”: An analysis of criminogenic prose in institutional holdup notes
- Semiosis du corps dans la littérature sexologique arabe