Home A semiotics of creativity and a poetic metaphor: Towards a dialogical relation of expression and explanation
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A semiotics of creativity and a poetic metaphor: Towards a dialogical relation of expression and explanation

  • Yunhee Lee EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 5, 2015

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the status and ontology of expression level of sign to propose the concept of creativity in connection with Peirce’s theory of symbol and particularly symbolization. I argue that the process of symbolization has a certain directionality from the ontological to the substantial domain of sign. Thus, the internal world of concept is connected to the external world of things. In other words, a symbol as a cultural code with connoted meaning requires another dimension of a new creative expression. As a result, denotation on the expression level becomes extended. Based on this, symbols grow through symbolization with creative thinking. This process of symbolization is commensurate with explaining how two domains are connected. Consequently, the concept of creativity on the expression plane needs an explanation from a semiotic viewpoint as to how the ontological domain of concepts or ideas is connected to the substantial domain of expression or things based not on a psychological aspect but on a logical inference through metaphorical and analogical reasoning.

Funding statement: Funding: This work was supported by Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Research Fund for 2015.

References

Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 2009. Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.Search in Google Scholar

Haley, Michael Cabot. 1988. The semeiosis of poetic metaphor. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hausman, Carl C. 1975. A discourse on novelty and creation. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-010-1666-7Search in Google Scholar

Jaynes, Julian. 1976. The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. Boston & New York: Houghton Mifflin.Search in Google Scholar

Lake, Robert. 2012. Vygotsky on education. New York: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Misak, Cheryl J. 2004. Truth and the end of inquiry: A Peircean account of truth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0199270597.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.[Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.]Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1998. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2 (1893–1913), Peirce Edition Project (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 2 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 2.]Search in Google Scholar

Percy, Walker. 1975. The message in the bottle: How queer man is. How queer language is. And how queer one has to do with the other. New York: Picador.Search in Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul. 1977. The rule of metaphor, Robert Czerny, K. McLaughlin & J. Costello (trans.). London & Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Tracy, David. 1987. Plurality and ambiguity: Hermeneutics, religion, hope. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Vygotsky, Lev S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Michael Cole, Vera John-Steiner, Sylvia Scribner & Ellen Souberman (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-11-5
Published in Print: 2016-1-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2015-0122/html
Scroll to top button