Home Linguistics & Semiotics Towards a semiotic definition of discourse and a basis for a typology of discourses
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Towards a semiotic definition of discourse and a basis for a typology of discourses

  • Max Boholm EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 31, 2015

Abstract

This article engages with the widely used academic concept of discourse. The aim is threefold: first, to provide a comprehensive overview of how the notion of discourse is conceived based on (a) definitions in the academic literature, (b) dictionary definitions, and (c) corpus data; second, to define discourse as a set of related representations; and, third, to suggest a basis for a typology of discourses. Following Peirce, a representation is regarded as a relationship between a signifier, signified element, and interpretant. A basis for a typology is developed by considering various types of representations and ways they are related.

Funding statement: Funding: This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (grant number 2009–1696).

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank Carola Betzold, Åsa Boholm, Anja Karlsson Franck, and Neva Leposa for their constructive criticism and suggestions.

References

Allwood, Jens & Lars-Gunnar Andersson. 1976. Semantik (Göteborg University LINGuisitcs [GULING] 1). Göteborg: Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University.Search in Google Scholar

Atkin, Albert. 2010. Peirce’s theory of signs. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/peirce-semiotics/(accessed 3 September 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Paul & Ellece Sibonile. 2011. Key terms in discourse analysis. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610295Search in Google Scholar

Boholm, Max. 2014. Political representations of nano in Swedish government documents. Science and Public Policy 41(5). 575–596.10.1093/scipol/sct092Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Gillian & George Yule. 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805226Search in Google Scholar

Burr, Vivien. 1995. An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203299968Search in Google Scholar

Chandler, Daniel. 2007. Semiotics: The basics. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203014936Search in Google Scholar

Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203561218Search in Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas & Adam Jaworski. 2009. Discourse. In Paul Cobley (ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics, 134–148. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2009. The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English: Design, architecture, and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(2), 159–190.10.1075/ijcl.14.2.02davSearch in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1979. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman. 2001 [1989]. Language and power, 2nd edn. Harlow: Longman.10.4324/9781315838250Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203697078Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman. 2013. Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies 7(2). 177–197.10.1080/19460171.2013.798239Search in Google Scholar

Fiske, John. 2011 [1982]. Introduction to communication studies. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203837382Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1972. The archaeology of knowledge & the discourse on language, A. M. Sheridan Smith (trans.). New York: Pantheon.Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1990. The history of sexuality, Robert Hurley (trans.), vol. 1. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Gee, James Paul. 1999. An introduction to discourse analysis. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Gee, James Paul. 2011. How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203850992Search in Google Scholar

Hajer, Maarten A. 1995. The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Hansson, Sven Ove. 2006. How to define – A tutorial. Princípios, Revista de Filosofia 13(19–20). 5–30.Search in Google Scholar

Hodge, Bob. 1984. Historical semantics and the meanings of “discourse”. Australian Journal of Cultural Studies 2(2). 124–130.Search in Google Scholar

Holmberg, Per, Anna-Malin Karlsson & Andreas Nord (eds.). 2011. Funktionell textanalys [Functional text analysis]. Stockholm: Nordstedts.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken & Brian Paltridge (eds.). 2011. The Bloomsbury companion to discourse analysis. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

Jørgensen, Marianne & Louise Phillips. 2002. Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage.10.4135/9781849208871Search in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto & Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lindenfeld, Jacqueline. 1971. Verbal and non-verbal elements in discourse. Semiotica 3(3). 223–233.10.1515/semi.1971.3.3.223Search in Google Scholar

Mandoki, Katya. 2004. Power and semiosis. Semiotica 151(1/4). 97–114.10.1515/semi.2004.075Search in Google Scholar

McEnery, Tony. & Andrew Wilson. 2001. Corpus linguistics: An introduction, 2nd edn. Edingburgh: Edingburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Merriam-Webster. 2014. discourse. Merriam-Webster Online. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discourse (accessed 10 October 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Mills, Sara. 1997. Discourse. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Morris, Charles W. 1938. Foundations of the theory of signs (International encyclopedia of unified science 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

OED. 2014. discourse, n. Oxford English Dictionary Online. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/53985?rskey=w3SYgf&result=1 (accessed 10 October 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Parker, Ian. 1990. Discourse: definitions and contradictions. Philosophical Psychology 3(2). 189–204.10.1057/9781137505279_13Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.]Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1992 [1867]. On a new list of categories. In Nathan Houser & Christian Kloesel (eds.), The essential Peirce, vol. 1, 1–10. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1998 [1894]. What is a sign? In Nathan Houser et al. (eds.), The essential Peirce, vol. 2, 4–10. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, Nelson & Cynthia Hardy. 2002. Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. Thousand Oaks: Sage10.4135/9781412983921Search in Google Scholar

Potter, Jonathan, Margaret Wetherell, Ros Gill & Derek Edwards. 1990. Discourse: Noun, verb or social practice? Philosophical Psychology 3(2). 205–217.10.1057/9781137505279_14Search in Google Scholar

Renkema, Jan. 2004. Introduction to discourse studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.124Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, Mairi. 1999. discourse. In Chambers twenty-first century dictionary, 381. Edinburgh: Chambers Harrap.Search in Google Scholar

Schiffrin, Deborah, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.). 2001a. The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Schiffrin, Deborah, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton. 2001b. Introduction. In Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 1–10. Malden: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9780631205968.2003.00001.xSearch in Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 2010. Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195396171.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Siefkes, Martin. 2010. Power in society, economy, and mentality: Towards a semiotic theory of power. Semiotica 181(1/4). 225–261.10.1515/semi.2010.042Search in Google Scholar

Stubbs, Michael. 1983. Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Thurlow, Crispin & Kristine Mroczek (eds.). 2011. Digital discourse: Language in the new media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, Teun A. 1993. Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 4(2). 249–283.10.1177/0957926593004002006Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, Teun A. 1997. What is political discourse analysis? In J. Blommaert & C. Bulcaen (eds.), Political linguistics, 11–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.10.1075/bjl.11.03dijSearch in Google Scholar

van Dijk, Teun A. (ed.) 2011 [2006]. Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction, 2nd edn. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446289068Search in Google Scholar

Widdowson, Henry G. 2007. Discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-10-31
Published in Print: 2016-1-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 25.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2015-0112/html
Scroll to top button