Startseite Naturwissenschaften A unified formulation for free vibration of functionally graded plates
Artikel Open Access

A unified formulation for free vibration of functionally graded plates

  • Parviz Malekzadeh und Mohammad Shojaee EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 17. September 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A simple, accurate, and unified formulation for the free vibration analysis of functionally graded (FG) plates is introduced. New four-variable first-order and higher-order shear deformation theories together with the classical FG plate theory can be easily achieved. The only assumption is that the transverse displacement consists of bending and shear components, and hence the theory has the potential to be used for modeling of the nonlinear FG plate problems. To validate the proposed formulation, the free vibration analysis of FG plates on two-parameter elastic foundation is conducted. The material properties vary continuously through the plate thickness. Analytical solutions for simply supported and approximate solutions for FG plates with arbitrary boundary conditions are extracted by extending the application of the conventional differential quadrature method as an accurate and efficient numerical tool. Comparison studies with existing two- and three-dimensional results available in open literature are performed. Excellent agreement between the results of the present formulation and the other theories is observed.

1 Introduction

Because of their superior thermomechanical properties, functionally graded materials (FGMs) have received wide applications as structural components in modern industries such as mechanical, aerospace, nuclear, reactors, and civil engineering in recent years [1]. Hence, significant efforts have been devoted to study the mechanical behaviors of structural elements made of these materials such as beams, plates, and shells. Also, it is well known that the vibration characteristic of plates made of FGMs is of great interest for better applications, engineering design, and manufacture.

Even if there are different two-dimensional theories for the free vibration analysis of functionally graded (FG) plates such as the classical plate theory (CPT) [2], [3], the first-order shear deformation theory (FSDT) [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], and the higher-order shear deformation theory (HSDT) [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], however, simple and accurate theories with low computational calculations can be still useful for both practical applications and theoretical studies on the free vibration of FG plates.

Because the transverse shear deformation effects are neglected in the CPT, it provides reasonable results for thin plates. For moderately thick plates, it underestimates deflection and overestimates buckling load as well as natural frequency [2], [3]. To overcome the deficiency of the CPT, many shear deformation theories have been used for the free vibration analysis of FG rectangular plates [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30]. The basic idea of these theories is based on the explanation of the in-plane and out-of-plane (transverse) displacement components in terms of known functions of the material coordinate in the plate thickness direction with unknown coefficients. The unknown coefficients are only functions of the in-plane material coordinate variables, and hence, the three-dimensional elasticity theory reduces to a two-dimensional theory one. In most of these theories, the polynomial series expansion is used [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24]. However, other functions such as hyperbolic functions [25], [26] or trigonometric functions [27] have been used by some researchers.

The simplest theory based on the polynomial series expansion is the FSDT. On the basis of this theory, only the linear terms in the series expansion of the in-plane displacement components are considered, and the transverse displacement is assumed to be constant through the thickness. According to these assumptions, the transverse shear stresses become constant through the thickness, but this assumption violates the shear stress-free surface conditions. Hence, shear correction factors are used to compensate for the difference between the actual stress state and the constant stress state [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. To avoid the use of shear correction factor, usually, the higher-order terms in the series expansions are considered [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24]. Depending on the numbers of terms in the in-plane displacement components expansion, whether the transverse displacement is assumed to be constant, whether stress-free boundary conditions are satisfied (constraint theory) or not (unconstraint theory), and whether additional assumptions are used to obtain the unknown coefficients, different HSDTs have been developed [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30].

Reddy’s third-order shear deformation theory [31], which has been initially developed for laminated composite plates, has been used by some researchers to study the free vibration of the FG rectangular plates [12], [13], [14], [15]. On the basis of this theory, the stress-free conditions on the top and bottom surface of the plate are satisfied by the displacement components (constraint theory).

Some others used unconstraint shear deformation theories. Roque et al. [16] and Shahrjerdi [17] developed unconstraint third- and second-order shear deformation theories for the free vibration analysis of FG plates, respectively. In both theories, constant transverse displacement was assumed.

To reduce the number of unknown variables, Benachour et al. [18] and Mechab et al. [19] extended the two-variable third-order shear deformation theory of Shimpi [32] to develop the four-variable third-order shear deformation theories for the free vibration of FG plates. The work of Malekzadeh et al. [33] differs from the others for its functions adopted in the in-plane displacement explanation.

Usually, the thickness stretching of the FG plates has been disregarded by neglecting the variation of the transverse displacement component along the thickness direction [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [25]. However, in some studies, the polynomial series expansion has been used for this displacement component in the thickness direction [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [26], [27]. Qian et al. [20], [21] applied a higher-order shear and normal deformable plate theory to analyze the static, free, and forced vibrations of a thick rectangular FG plates. On the basis of this theory, the three components of displacement were expanded in terms of Legendre polynomials in the thickness direction. Matsunaga [22] presented a two-dimensional higher-order deformation theory for the free vibration and stability analysis of FG plates. The in-plane and the transverse displacement components were expressed as polynomial power series of the thickness coordinate variable. Fares et al. [23] developed a two-dimensional theory account for the displacements field in which the in-plane displacements vary linearly through the plate thickness, whereas the out-of-plane displacement was a quadratic function of the thickness coordinate variable. Talha and Singh [24] proposed a third-order shear deformation theory, which included the quadratic variation of the transverse displacement through the plate thickness to study the free vibration of FG rectangular plates.

In the previously reviewed studies, the in-plane displacement components have been expanded in terms of the polynomial functions of the thickness coordinate variable. Ait Atmane [25] used the hyperbolic functions to represent through the thickness variation of the in-plane displacement components and implement the stress-free boundary conditions on the top and the bottom of the FG plates. Neves et al. [26], [27] presented sinusoidal and hyperbolic shear deformation theories for the static and free vibration analysis of FG plates by assuming sinusoidal and hyperbolic type variations across the thickness coordinate for the in-plane displacement components, respectively. In both theories, a quadratic variation was considered for the transverse displacement component in the thickness direction.

The aim of this work is to represent a simple, accurate, and unified formulation for the free vibration analysis of FG plates. New four-variable first- and third-order shear deformation theories, as against five variables in the case of the conventional form of these theories, and also CPT are easily achieved. This theory is free of the assumption of zero in-plane resultant forces used in developing the other four-variable shear deformation theories [18], [19], [34] and hence has the potential to be used for modeling of the nonlinear FG plate problems. In addition, despite the other four-variable theories [18], [19], [34], only the transverse displacement is assumed to consist of bending and shear components. As a result, some new functions are created for the in-plane displacement component explanation. The in-plane displacements cause the parabolic variations of shear strains through the thickness in such a way that the transverse shear stresses vanish on the top and bottom plate surfaces. The theory takes into account the quadratic variation of the transverse shear strains through the thickness of the plate, and hence, it does not require the use of shear correction factors. The equations of motion and the related boundary conditions for the FG plates on two-parameter elastic foundation are derived using Hamilton’s principle. Exact solutions for the simply supported FG plates are extracted. In addition, by extending the application of differential quadrature method (DQM) as an accurate and computationally efficient numerical method [9], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], approximate solutions for the FG plates with arbitrary boundary conditions are developed. Comparison studies with the other available two- and three-dimensional solutions in the open literature are performed, and excellent agreement is observed.

2 Theoretical formulation

Consider an FG rectangular plate of length Lx=a, width Ly=b, and thickness h, which is supported on a two-parameter elastic foundation as shown in Figure 1. A Cartesian coordinate system (x, y, z) is used to label the material points of the plates in the undeformed reference configuration. The in-plane displacement components u̅ (in the x-direction) and v̅ (in the y-direction) and the transverse displacement component w̅ (in the z-direction) can be approximated as

Figure 1: The FG plate supported on elastic foundation.
Figure 1:

The FG plate supported on elastic foundation.

(1a)u¯(x,y,z,t)=u(x,y,t)+zφ1+z2φ2+z3φ3,
(1b)v¯(x,y,z,t)=v(x,y,t)+zψ1+z2ψ2+z3ψ3,
(1c)w¯(x,y,z,t)=wb(x,y,t)+ws(x,y,t),

where u and v are the in-plane displacement components of material points on the mid-plane of the FG plate along the x- and y-directions, respectively, and wb and ws are the bending and shear transverse displacement components of an arbitrary material point of the FG plate. In addition, φi and ψi (with i=1, 2, 3) are functions that represent the thickness variations of the in-plane displacement components.

In this study, as a first assumption, the functions due to the linear variation of the in-plane displacement components are approximated as

(2a)φ1=wbx,
(2b)ψ1=wby.

This assumption together with the zero shear stress components on the top and bottom surface of the FG plate can easily reduce the theory to the CPT one. For an isotropic FG plate, the last aforementioned assumption gives

(3a)γxz=0,
(3b)γyz=0 at z=±h/2,

where γiz (with i=x, y) are the transverse shear strain components. On the basis of the linear elasticity theory, Equations (1), (2), and (3) yield

(4a)φ2=0,
(4b)ψ2=0,
(4c)φ3=αwsx,
(4d)ψ3=αwsy,

where α=43h2. Using Equations (1), (2), and (4), the nonzero linear strain tensor components in terms of displacement components become

(5a)εxx=uxz2wbx2αz32wsx2,
(5b)εyy=vyz2wby2αz32wsy2,
(5c)γxy=vx+uy2z2wbxy2αz32wsxy,
(5d)γyz=(13αz2)wsy,
(5e)γxz=(13αz2)wsx,

where εii (with i=x, y) and γxy are the in-plane normal and shear strain tensor components, respectively.

It is interesting to note that if one insert α=0 in the strain tensor components, the theory reduces to a new first-order shear deformation theory (NFSDT), which has four degrees of freedom instead of five degrees of freedom of the conventional FSDT. The strain components of this new FSDT become

(6a)εxx=uxz2wbx2,
(6b)εyy=vyz2wby2,
(6c)γxy=vx+uy2z2wbxy,
(6d)γxz=wsx,
(6e)γyz=wsy.

In addition, if the shear component of the transverse displacement is neglected, then the theory reduces to the CPT one, which has the following nonzero strain components:

(7a)εxx=uxz2wbx2,
(7b)εyy=vyz2wby2,
(7c)γxy=vx+uy2z2wbxy.

According to the linear elasticity theory and the present HSDT, the relation between the nonzero stress tensor components and the displacement components can be written as

(8a)σxx=E(1ν2)[ux+νvyz(2wbx2+ν2wby2)αz3(2wsx2+ν2wsy2)],
(8b)σyy=E(1ν2)[vy+νuxz(2wby2+ν2wby2)αz3(2wsy2+ν2wsx2)],
(8c)σxy=G[uy+vx2z(2wbxy)2αz32wsxy],
(8d)σxz=G(13αz2)wsx,
(8e)σyz=G(13αz2)wsy,

where E, G[=E2(1+ν)], and v are Young’s modulus, shear rigidity, and Poisson’s ratio of the FG plate, respectively. Also, the material properties of the plate are assumed to vary continuously through the thickness of the plate. In this study, an arbitrary material property P of the FG plate is obtained by using the power law distribution as

(9)P(z)=Pm+[PcPm](Vf)p,p0

where the subscripts c and m refer to the ceramic and metal constituents, respectively; p is the material property graded index or the power law index; and Vf[=(2z+h2h)] is the volume fraction [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45].

The equations of motion and the related boundary conditions can be derived in a systematic manner using Hamilton’s principle, which for the free vibration analysis takes the following form:

(10)t1t2(δKδU)dt=0,

where δK and δU are the variation of the kinetic energy and strain energy, respectively, and t1 and t2 are two arbitrary times.

The variation of strain energy of the FG plate can be stated as

(11)δU=V{σxx(δuxz2δwbx2αz32δwsx2)+σyy(vyz2wby2αz32wsy2)+σxy(δvx+δuy2z2δwbxy2αz32δwsxy)+σxz(13αz2)δwsx+σyz(13αz2)δwsy}dV+A{ks[(wb+ws)x(δwb+δws)x+(wb+ws)y(δwb+δws)y]+kw(wb+ws)(δwb+δws)}dA,

where kw (N/m3) is the spring or Winkler parameter of the elastic foundation and ks (N/m) is the shear or Pasternak parameter of the elastic foundation, which are shown in Figure 1 [46], [47], [48]. Also, the variation of kinetic energy is obtained as

(12)δT=V(u¯tδu¯t+v¯tδv¯t+wtδwt)=V[(utzwbtxαz3wstx)(δutzδwbtxαz3δwstx)+(vtzwbtyαz3wsty)(δvtzδwbtyαz3δwsty)+(wb+ws)t(δwb+δws)t]dV.

Substituting Equations (11) and (12) into Equation (10) and performing the integration by parts, the equations of motion and the related boundary conditions of the proposed plate theory are obtained as follows:

δu:

(13)Nxxx+Nxyy=I02ut2I13wbt2xαI33wst2x

δv:

(14)Nyyy+Nxyx=I02vt2I13wbt2yαI33wst2y

δwb:

(15)2Mxxx2+22Mxyxy+2Myyy2kw(wb+ws)+ks2(wb+ws)=I02(wb+ws)t2+I12t2(ux+vy)I22t2(2wb)αI42t2(2ws)

δws:

(16)α(2Pxxx2+22Pxyxy+2Pyyy2)+Qxx+Qyykw(wb+ws)+ks2(wb+ws)=I02(wb+ws)t2+αI32t2(ux+vy)αI42t2(2wb)α2I62t2(2ws)

In-plane boundary conditions:

Either un=nxu+nyv is prescribed or

(17a, b)Nnn=nx2Nxx+nxnyNxy+ny2Nyy=0.

Either us=−nyu+nxv is prescribed or

(18a, b)Nns=(nx2ny2)Nxynxny(NyyNxx)=0.

Out-of-plane boundary conditions:

Either wb is prescribed or

(19a, b)Vnb=(Mxxx+Mxyy)nx+(Myyy+Mxyx)ny+ks(wb+ws)n=0.

Either wbn is prescribed or

(20a, b)Mnn=nx2Mxx+nxnyMxy+ny2Myy=0.

Either ws is prescribed or

(21a, b)Vns=(Pxxx+Pxyy)nx+(Pyyy+Pxyx)ny+Qxnx+Qyny+ks(wb+ws)n=0.

Either wsn is prescribed or

(22a, b)Pnn=nx2Pxx+nxnyPxy+ny2Pyy=0,

where ()n=nx()x+ny()y;Nij, Mij, Pij, and Qi with (i, j=x, y) are the stress resultants, and Ii (i=0, 1, …, 4, 6) is the mass inertia, which has the following definitions:

(23a)(Nij,Mij,Pij)=h2h2(1,z,z3)σijdz,
(23b)Qi=h2h2(13αz2)σizdz,
(23c)Ii=h2h2ρzidz,

where ρ is the mass density of the FG plate. Substituting for the stress tensor components in terms of the displacement components from Equation (8), one obtains

(24a){NxyMxyPxy}=[AsBsαCsBsDsαFsCsFsαHs]{uy+vx22wbxy22wsxy},
(24b){QxQy}=[Dsi00Dsi]{wsxwsy},
(24c){NxxNyyMxxMyyPxxPyy}=[AA^BB^αCαC^A^AB^BαC^αCBB^DD^αFαF^B^BD^DαF^αFCC^FF^αHαH^C^CF^FαH^αH]{uxvy2wbx22wby22wsx22wsy2},

where the stiffness coefficients are

(25a)[ABDCFHA^B^D^C^F^H^AsBsDsCsFsHs]=h2h2[E^(z)νE^(z)G(z)][1zz2z3z4z6]dz,E^=E(1ν2)
(25b)Dsi=h2h2G(z)(13αz2)2dz.

Different types of classical boundary conditions at the edges of the plate can be obtained by combining the conditions stated in Equations (17–22). Two types of boundary conditions that are considered in this study are as follows:

Simply support (S):

(26a–f)us=0,wb=0,ws=0,Nnn=0,Mnn=0,Pnn=0

Clamped (C):

(27a–f)un=0,us=0,wb=0,ws=0,wbn=0,wsn=0

Using Equations (8) and (23), the equations of motion [Equations (13–16)] in terms of the displacement components take the following forms, respectively:

Equation (13):

(28)A2ux2+A^2vxyB3wbx3B^3wbxy2αC3wsx3αC^3wsxy2+As(2uy2+2vxy)2Bs3wbxy22αCs3wsxy2=I02ut2I13wbt2xαI33wst2x

Equation (14):

(29)A2vy2+A^2uxyB3wby3B^3wbyx2αC3wsy3αC^3wsyx2+As(2uxy+2vx2)2Bs3wbyx22αCs3wsyx2=I02vt2I13wbt2yαI33wst2y

Equation (15):

(30)B3ux3+B^3vx2yD4wbx4D^4wbx2y2αF4wsx4αF^4wsx2y2+2Bs(3uy2x+3vx2y)4Ds4wbx2y24αFs4wsx2y2+B^3uy2x+B3vy3D4wby4D^4wbx2y2αF4wsy4αF^4wsx2y2kw(wb+ws)+ks2(wb+ws)=I02(wb+ws)t2+I12t2(ux+vy)I22t2(2wb)αI42t2(2ws)

Equation (16):

(31)α[C3ux3+C^3vx2yF4wbx4F^4wbx2y2αH4wsx4αH^4wbx2y2+2Cs(uy2x+vx2y)4Fs4wbx2y24αHs4wsx2y2+B3uy2x+B^3vy3F4wby4F^4wbx2y2αH4wsy4αH^4wsx2y2]+Dsi2wskw(wb+ws)+ks2(wb+ws)=I0(wb+ws)t2α2I62t2(2ws)+αI32t2(ux+vy)αI42t2(2wb)

In a similar manner, the natural boundary conditions can be expressed in terms of the displacement components.

3 Solution procedure

3.1 Analytical solution for the simply supported FG plates

For the simply supported FG plates, the displacement components can be represented in the following forms, which automatically satisfy the related conditions at the edges of the FG plates:

(32a)u(x,y,t)=m=1n=1UmneJωmntcosβmxsinγny,
(32b)v(x,y,t)=m=1n=1VmneJωmntsinβmxcosγny,
(32c)wb(x,y,t)=m=1n=1WmnbeJωmntsinβmxsinγny,
(32d)ws(x,y,t)=m=1n=1WmnseJωmntsinβmxsinγny,

where J=1,βm=mπa, and γn=nπb;m and n are the wave numbers along the x- and y-directions, respectively; Umn, Vmn, Wmnb, and Wmns are the amplitudes of the displacement components; and ωmn is the natural frequency.

Inserting for the displacement components from Equation (32) into the equations of motion [Equations (28–31)], one obtains

(33)([S^ijmn]ωmn2[M^ijmn]){Dmn}=0,

where {Dmn}={UmnVmnWmnbWmns} is the vector of degrees of freedom; also, both the stiffness matrix [S^ijmn] and the mass matrix [M^ijmn] are symmetric, and their elements are

(34a)S^11mn=(Aβm2+Asγn2),
(34b)S^12mn=(A^+As)βmγn,
(34c)S^13mn=βm[Bβm2+(B^+2Bs)γn2] ,
(34d)S^14mn=αβm[Cβm2+(C^+2Cs)γn2],
(34e)S^22mn=(Aγm2+Asβn2),
(34f)S^23mn=γm[Bγm2+(B^+2Bs)βn2],
(34g)S^24mn=αγm[Cγm2+(C^+2Cs)βn2],
(34h)S^33mn=[Dβm4+2(D^+2Ds)βn2γn2+Dγn4]ks(βm2+γn2)kw,
(34i)S^34mn=α[Fβm4+2(F^+2Fs)βn2γn2+Fγn4]ks(βm2+γn2)kw,
(34j)M^33mn=I0+I2(βm2+γn2),
(34k)S^44mn=α2[Hβm4+2(H^+2Hs)βm2γn2+Hγn4]ks(βm2+γn2)kw,
(34l)M^13mn=I1βm,
(34m)M^14mn=αI3βm,
(34n)M^23mn=I1γn,
(34o)M^24mn=αI3γn,
(34p)M^34mn=I0+αI4(βm2+γn2),
(34q)M^44mn=I0+α2I6(βm2+γn2).

For the given values of the wave numbers m and n, the related natural frequencies are easily obtained from the system of algebraic eigenvalue equations [Equation (33)].

3.2 Approximate solution for the FG plates with arbitrary boundary conditions

Because it is difficult to obtain the analytical solution for the free vibration analysis of FG plates with arbitrary boundary conditions, the approximate methods should be used to solve the problem. On the other hand, the DQM is an efficient and accurate numerical approach in comparison with the weighted residual methods such as the finite element (FE) method [9], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38]. The weak form of the governing equations is solved in using the FE method, whereas the DQM discretizes the strong form of the governing equations. Furthermore, vice versa, the DQM exactly satisfies all types of boundary conditions. Also, the advantage of the DQM over the other meshless methods is its simplicity and low computational efforts [9], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [49], [50].

The basic idea of the DQM is that the derivatives of a function, with respect to a space variable at a given sampling point, are approximated as a weighted linear sum of the sampling points in the domain of that variable. In this method, at a given grid point (xi, yj), the first- and the second-order derivatives of a function can be approximated as

(35a)fη|(xi,yj)=m=1NηAimηfmj,
(35b)2fη2|(xi,yj)=m=1NηBimηfmj,

for i, j=1, …, Nη,

where η=x or y; fij means the function value at the grid point (xi, yj); Aimη and Bimη are the weighting coefficients of the first- and second-order derivatives of the η-direction (η=x or y), respectively; and Nη is the number of grid points along the η-direction (η=x or y). To determine the weighting coefficients, a set of test functions should be used in Equation (35). For the polynomial basis functions DQM, a set of Lagrange polynomials are used as the test functions. The weighting coefficients for the first- and the second-order derivatives along the η-direction are determined as follows [33], [34], [38]:

(36)Aijη={1LηM(ηi)(ηiηj)M(ηj)for iji=1,ijNηAijηfor i=j and i,j=1,2,Nη,

where M(ηi)=j=1,ijNη(ηiηj) and Lη is the nanoplate length along the η-direction (η=x or y). The weighting coefficients of the second-order derivative can be obtained as

(37)[Bijη]=[Aijη][Aijη]=[Aijη]2.

It is shown that among the different rules for the grid generation, the Chebyshev-Gauss-Lobatto quadrature points give more accurate results [9], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38]. Hence, in this study, this type of grid generation rule is used.

One of the drawbacks of the conventional DQM is that the boundary condition imposition of the higher-order differential equations (order ≥ 3), which have multiple boundary conditions at a boundary grid points for a field variable, cannot be done in a straightforward manner. A special treatment is necessary to implement the multiple boundary conditions [34], [35]. To overcome this shortcoming, different methodologies have been suggested [34], [35]. In this work, the proposed approach by Karami and Malekzadeh [34] is further extended to implement the boundary conditions exactly at the boundary grid points. On the basis of this approach, the only degrees of freedom within the domain are the in-plane and transverse displacement components (u, v, wb, ws); however, along the boundaries, these displacement components as well as the second-order derivatives of the transverse displacement components (wb, ws) with respect to the associated normal coordinate variable to that boundary [34] are chosen as the degrees of freedom. Hence, along the edges x=0 and a, the degrees of freedom become (u,v,wb,ws,2wbx2,2wsx2), whereas along the edges y=0 and b, these are (u,v,wb,ws,2wby2,2wsy2).

Using the differential quadrature (DQ) rules, the discretized form of Equations (28–31) are obtained as follows:

Equation (28):

(38)Ap=1NxBipxupj+A^p=1Nxq=1NyAipxAjqyvpqB(p=1NxC¯ipxwpjb+Ai1xκ1jxb+AiNxxκNxjxb)B^p=1Nxq=1NyAipxBjqywpqbαC(p=1NxC¯ipxwpjs+Ai1xκ1jxs+AiNxxκNxjxs)αC^p=1Nxq=1NyAipxBjqywpqs2Bsp=1Nxq=1NyAipxBjqywpqb+As(q=1NyBjqyuiq+p=1Nxq=1NyAipxAjqyvpq)2αCsp=1Nxq=1NyAipxBjqywpqs=I0(2ut2)ijI1p=1NxAipx(2wbt2)pjI3p=1NxAipx(2wst2)pj

Equation (29):

(39)Aq=1NyBjqyviq+A^p=1Nxq=1NyAipxAjqyupqB(q=1NyC¯jqywiqb+Aj1yκi1yb+AjNyyκiNyyb)B^p=1Nxq=1NyBipxAjqywpqbαC(q=1NyC¯jqywiqs+Aj1yκi1ys+AjNyyκiNyys)αC^p=1Nxq=1NyBipxAjqywpqs2Bsp=1Nxq=1NyBipxAjqywpqb+As(p=1NxBipxvpj+p=1Nxq=1NyAipxAjqyupq)2αCsp=1Nxq=1NyBipxAjqywpqs=I0(2vt2)ijI1q=1NyAjqy(2wbt2)iqI3p=1NyAjqy(2wst2)iq

Equation (30):

(40)Bp=1NxCipxupj+B^p=1Nxq=1NyBipxAjqyvpqD(p=1NxD¯ipxwpjb+Bi1xκ1jxb+BiNxxκNxjxb)2(D^+2Ds)p=1Nxq=1NyBipxBjqywpqbαF(p=1NxD¯ipxwpjs+Bi1xκ1jxs+BiNxxκNxjxs)2α(F^+2Fs)p=1Nxq=1NyBipxBjqywpqs+2Bs(p=1Nxq=1NyAipxBjqyupq+p=1Nxq=1NyBipxAjqyvpq)+Bq=1NyCjqyviq+B^p=1Nxq=1NyAipxBjqyupqD(q=1NyD¯jqywiqb+Aj1yκi1yb+AjNyyκiNyyb)αF(q=1NyD¯jqywiqs+Aj1yκi1ys+AjNyyκiNyys)+ks[p=1NxBipx(wpjb+wpjs)+q=1NyBjqy(wiqb+wiqs)]kw(wijb+wijs)=2t2[I0(wijb+wijs)+I1(p=1NxAipxupj+q=1NyAjqyviq)I2(p=1NxBipxwpjb+q=1NyBjqywiqb)αI4(p=1NxBipxwpjs+q=1NyBjqywiqs)]

Equation (31):

(41)α[Cp=1NxCipxupj+C^p=1Nxq=1NyBipxAjqyvpqF(p=1NxD¯ipxwpjb+Bi1xκ1jxb+BiNxxκNxjxb)2(F^+2Fs)p=1Nxq=1NyBipxBjqywpqbαH(p=1NxD¯ipxwpjs+Bi1xκ1jys+BiNxxκNxjys)2α(H^+2Hs)p=1Nxq=1NyBipxBjqywpqs+2Cs(p=1Nxq=1NyAipxBjqyupq+p=1Nxq=1NyBipxAjqyvpq)+Cq=1NyCjqyviq+C^p=1Nxq=1NyAipxBjqyupqF(q=1NyD¯jqywiqb+Aj1yκi1b+AjNyyκiNyb)αH(q=1NyD¯jqywiqs+Aj1yκi1ys+AjNyyκiNyys)]+ks[p=1NxBipx(wpjb+wpjs)+q=1NyBjqy(wiqb+wiqs)]kw(wijb+wijs)=2t2[I0(wijb+wijs)+αI3(p=1NxAipxupj+q=1NyAjqyviq)αI4(p=1NxBipxwpjb+q=1NyBjqywiqb)α2I6(p=1NxBipxwpjs+q=1NyBjqywiqs)],

where κijημ=2wμη2(μ=b or s and η=x or y),

(42a–d)C¯ipx=q=2Nx1AiqxBqpx,D¯ipx=q=2Nx1BiqxBqpx,C¯jqy=q=2Ny1AjpxBpjx,D¯jqy=p=2Ny1BjpxBpqx.

Also, the DQ discretized form of the boundary conditions can be obtained in a similar manner. The DQ analogs of the boundary conditions along the edges η=0 and η=Lη with η=x and y become as follows:

Simply supported edges

At x=0 (with i=1) and x=a (with i=Nx):

(43a–f)vij=0,p=1NxAipxupj=0,wijb=0,wijs=0,κijxb=0,κijxs=0 for j=1,,Ny

At y=0 (with j= 1) and y=b (with j=Ny):

(44a–f)uij=0,q=1NyAjqyviq=0,wijb=0,wijs=0,κijyb=0,κijys=0 for i=1,,Nx,

Clamped edges

(45a–e)uij=0,vij=0,wijμ=0,κijμηn=1Nηm=2Nη1AimηAmnηwnjμ=0for μ=b,s and η=x,y

It can be seen that these boundary conditions can easily and directly be implemented into the discretized form of the equations of motion [Equations (38–41)].

Using the harmonic nature of the temporal variation of the displacement components in free vibration motion, subsequently, one obtains a system of eigenvalue equations from which the FG plate natural frequencies and the related mode shapes are obtained [9], [33], [34], [38].

4 Numerical results

In this section, first, the accuracy of the presented formulation for the free vibration of the FG plates is demonstrated by comparing the analytical solution with those of other available results in the open literature. In addition, the convergence behavior and accuracy of the numerical solution (DQM) is investigated. The constituent material properties of FG plates are given in Table 1. The boundary conditions of the plate are specified by the letter symbols; for example, C-S-C-S indicates that the edges x=0 and y=0 are clamped and the edges x=a and y=b are simply supported, respectively. Also, the following nondimensional parameters are used in this section,

Table 1:

Constituent material properties of FG plates [11].

MaterialConstituentProperties
E (N/m2)νρ (kg/m3)
MetalAluminum (Al)70×1090.302707
CeramicAlumina (Al2O3)380×1090.303800
(46)Ks=ksa2Dm,Kw=kwa4Dm,ωi=ωihρm/Em,ω¯i=ωi(a2/h)ρm/Em,ω^i=ωi(a2/h)ρc/Ec,ω˜i=ωi(a2/π2)ρch/Dc,

where Dm=Emh312(1νm2) and Dc=Ech312(1νc2).

There are some research studies that cover the free vibration of the FG plates, and they have interesting examples for comparison, such as those of Zhu and Liew [11], Baferani et al. [15], Reddy [51], Bian et al. [52], Lü et al. [53], and Thai and Choi [54]. Studies more relevant to the present work are chosen for comparison. As a first example, in Tables 2 and 3, the nondimensional fundamental natural frequency parameters of the rectangular simply supported FG plates with and without elastic foundation are compared with those of the higher-order theory of Baferani et al. [15]. Again, as another example, in Tables 4 and 5, a comparison between the nondimensional fundamental natural frequency parameter results of presented method and those obtained by Thai and Choi [54] are prepared for the rectangular simply supported FG plates with and without elastic foundation. The comparison studies in Tables 25 are performed for the different values of the material property graded index “p” and the three different values of the length-to-thickness (a/h) ratio. The results of both new first-order shear deformation theory (NFSDT) and new higher-order shear deformation theory (NHSDT) are presented in these tables. A shear correction factor of 5/6 is used for the NFSDT. It can be seen that in all cases, the results of the present formulation are almost the same as those obtained by Baferani et al. [15]. The accuracy of the present formulation is further exhibited by comparing the first three frequency parameters of the simply supported moderately thick FG plates obtained using the NFSDT and the NHSDT with those of the conventional FSDT [11] in Table 6. The results are prepared for the different values of the material property graded index “p”, and close agreement between the results of the present theory with those of Zhu and Liew [11] can be observed. It should be mentioned that Zhu and Liew [11] conducted the results based on the conventional FSDT using the local Kriging meshless method.

Table 2:

Comparison study of the nondimensional fundamental frequency parameter ω1 of simply supported FG plates (a/b=1, Kw=Ks=0).

a/hp=0p=0.5p=1p=2p=5
Present (NFSDT)200.02910.02470.02220.02020.0191
Present (NHSDT)0.02910.02470.02220.02020.0191
Baferani et al. [15]0.02910.02490.02270.02090.0197
Present (NFSDT)100.11350.09630.08680.07880.0743
Present (NHSDT)0.11350.09630.08680.07870.0740
Baferani et al. [15]0.11340.09750.08910.08190.0767
Present (NFSDT)50.41530.35420.31940.28910.2701
Present (NHSDT)0.41540.35470.31950.28800.2659
Baferani et al. [15]0.41540.36060.32990.30160.2765
Table 3:

Comparison study of the nondimensional fundamental frequency parameter ω1 of simply supported FG plates (a/b=1, Kw=Ks=100).

a/hp=0p=0.5p=1p=2p=5
Present (NFSDT)200.04110.03920.03840.03810.0384
Present (NHSDT)0.04110.03920.03840.03810.0383
Baferani et al. [15]0.04110.03950.03880.03860.0388
Present (NFSDT)100.16190.15490.15180.15030.1515
Present (NHSDT)0.16190.15490.15180.15030.1513
Baferani et al. [15]0.16190.15630.15420.15350.1543
Present (NFSDT)50.61610.59400.58300.57700.5817
Present (NHSDT)0.61620.59420.58310.57680.5807
[Baferani et al. [15]0.61620.60260.59780.59700.5993
Table 4:

Comparison study of the nondimensional fundamental frequency parameter ω¯1 of simply supported FG plates (Kw=Ks=0).

a/ba/hp=0p=0.5p=1p=2p=5p=10
Present (NFSDT)0.556.76665.75765.19074.70404.41544.2537
Present (NHSDT)6.76725.76245.19124.69094.36584.2010
Tahi and Choi [54]6.76105.76575.20164.70524.37574.2058
Present (NFSDT)107.18126.08915.48754.98434.71214.5562
Present (NHSDT)7.18136.09055.48764.98014.69614.5391
Tahi and Choi [54]7.17466.08865.48874.98334.69874.5404
Present (NFSDT)207.30036.18375.57235.06494.79864.6450
Present (NHSDT)7.30036.18415.57235.06384.79434.6404
Tahi and Choi [54]7.29366.18055.57045.06324.79434.6404
Present (NFSDT)1510.38358.85537.98607.22706.75356.4909
Present (NHSDT)10.38578.86657.98747.19896.64656.3777
Tahi and Choi [54]10.37618.87648.01227.23116.66786.3879
Present (NFSDT)1011.34549.62748.67697.87727.43497.1832
Present (NHSDT)11.34569.63098.67717.86707.39627.1418
Tahi and Choi [54]11.33519.62988.68247.87637.40347.1453
Present (NFSDT)2011.64159.86398.88798.07467.63857.3912
Present (NHSDT)11.64149.86308.88798.07747.64947.4028
Tahi and Choi [54]11.63079.85878.88598.07497.63947.3916
Present (NFSDT)2522.704019.490517.598315.870314.653413.9898
Present (NHSDT)22.725519.543517.612515.771114.258213.5750
Tahi and Choi [54]22.704519.591017.714815.895314.331213.6095
Present (NFSDT)1027.066423.030420.763018.815917.661617.0150
Present (NHSDT)27.068923.049720.764618.763517.463116.8040
Tahi and Choi [54]27.043923.062920.806318.820617.502816.8232
Present (NFSDT)2028.724824.356421.950119.937418.848318.2250
Present (NHSDT)28.725024.362021.950219.920518.784318.1564
Tahi and Choi [54]28.698524.354421.954819.933318.795018.1616
Table 5:

Comparison study of the nondimensional fundamental frequency parameter ω¯1 of simply supported FG plates on elastic foundation (Kw=Ks=100).

a/ba/hp=0p=0.5p=1p=2p=5p=10
Present (NFSDT)0.5511.405411.223211.151011.161911.332511.4457
Present (NHSDT)11.405711.224911.151111.159211.323511.4360
Thai and Choi [54]11.395211.233111.178011.201811.359311.4558
Present (NFSDT)1011.736511.502011.424311.446711.622611.7113
Present (NHSDT)11.736611.502711.424411.445111.617111.7056
Thai and Choi [54]11.725711.499211.427011.453011.624311.7093
Present (NFSDT)2011.835511.584611.504411.529011.707011.7904
Present (NHSDT)11.835511.584811.504411.528511.705311.7886
Thai and Choi [54]11.824611.578011.500511.527311.705411.7886
Present (NFSDT)1515.403414.850814.575714.425914.542814.6536
Present (NHSDT)15.404614.855714.576314.418914.518514.6276
Thai and Choi [54]15.390414.875714.630514.500414.584314.6636
Present (NFSDT)1016.187715.489015.178715.031215.150115.2132
Present (NHSDT)16.187815.491015.178815.026615.133915.1964
Thai and Choi [54]16.172815.489515.188715.045515.149715.2045
Present (NFSDT)2016.440115.692815.369815.221615.344715.3975
Present (NHSDT)16.440115.693415.369815.220215.339515.3921
Thai and Choi [54]16.424915.685115.366315.220915.341415.3929
Present (NFSDT)2528.658726.693925.574424.681624.435524.4661
Present (NHSDT)28.673226.722525.581024.650024.312124.3323
Thai and Choi [54]28.646726.800925.764024.907724.503624.4352
Present (NFSDT)1032.417229.681328.271927.237326.921126.7797
Present (NHSDT)32.419229.695228.273027.205826.808526.6630
Thai and Choi [54]32.389329.713328.332227.293126.874126.6964
Present (NFSDT)2033.918130.865929.340428.256027.954727.7779
Present (NHSDT)33.918330.870229.340428.244527.913127.7345
Thai and Choi [54]33.886930.860629.346728.262827.929427.7426
Table 6:

Comparison study of the nondimensional frequency parameter ω^i of simply supported FG plates (a/b=1, h/a=0.1, Kw=Ks=0).

p=0p=1
ω^1ω^2ω^3ω^1ω^2ω^3
Present (NHSDT)5.769413.765021.12534.412410.559216.2469
Present (NFSDT)5.769313.763721.12074.412410.558316.2440
Zhu and Liew [11]5.761913.798021.10454.410610.613016.2867
p=2p=5
Present (NHSDT)4.00059.541514.64303.76118.880313.5194
Present (NFSDT)4.00579.568214.70023.78088.981213.7370
Zhu and Liew [11]4.00599.626614.75853.78069.026713.7768

The convergence behavior of the DQM in solving the free vibration equations of the FG plates on elastic foundation based on the present NFSDT and NHSDT is studied in Table 7. For this purpose, the FG plates with two different set of boundary conditions are analyzed, and their first three frequency parameters are presented in Table 7. It is evident that using only the few grid points converged, accurate results are obtained, which demonstrate the high computational efficiency of the DQM. Hereafter, a value of Nx=Ny=N=19 is used to report the numerical results for the FG plates. In addition, the accuracy of the DQM is demonstrated by showing its ability in predicting the first three nondimensional frequency parameters of the S-C-S-C FG plates in Table 8. The results are compared with the three-dimensional solution obtained using a semianalytical method by Malekzadeh [33]. The close agreement of the results demonstrates the correctness of the formulation and method of solution.

Table 7:

Convergence behavior of the DQM for the first three nondimensional frequency parameters ω¯i of FG plates on elastic foundation (a/b=1, h/a=0.2, p=1, Kw=Ks=100).

Nx=NyC-S-S-SC-S-C-S
ω¯1ω¯2ω¯3ω¯1ω¯2ω¯3
NFSDT915.591126.174027.387216.642426.752729.2401
1115.591626.175127.393816.643026.754629.2646
1715.591626.175227.393616.643026.754729.2639
1915.591626.175227.393616.643026.754729.2639
NHSDT915.599326.186127.429416.664526.772429.3208
1115.603926.189727.453016.676726.781029.3801
1715.611926.195127.484616.699726.794429.4476
1915.612926.195827.491216.702626.796129.4566
2115.613526.196127.493516.704226.797029.4613
2315.613726.196327.494616.704926.797429.4637
Table 8:

Accuracy of the DQM in predicting the first three nondimensional frequency parameters ω˜i of the S-C-S-C FG plates (a/b=1, p=1, Kw= Ks=0).

h/a=0.3h/a=0.5
ω˜1ω˜2ω˜3ω˜1ω˜2ω˜3
Present (NHSDT)1.59422.68423.03111.19321.92232.0649
Malekzadeh [33]1.51422.65222.86371.11501.83541.9489

The accuracy of the present formulation, both NFSDT and NHSDT, is further demonstrated by investigating the free vibration of moderately thick FG plates with and without elastic foundation subjected to some mixed boundary conditions in Tables 9 and 10, respectively. The results are prepared for different values of the material graded index “p”, three different values of the thickness-to-length ratio, and two mixed set of boundary conditions.

Table 9:

Comparison study of the nondimensional fundamental frequency parameter ω¯1 of the simply supported square FG plates (a/b=1, Kw=Ks=0).

BCa/hp=0p=0.5p=1p=2p=5p=10
Present (NFSDT)SCSC513.934411.999310.88659.86679.10088.6500
Present (NHSDT)13.981512.059010.91869.82298.87768.4242
Present (NFSDT)1016.167513.767912.433711.291510.605710.2042
Present (NHSDT)16.174713.782712.438411.266210.502010.0955
Present (NFSDT)2016.941214.367412.954211.773811.134310.7627
Present (NHSDT)16.941814.370712.954611.765511.102210.7286
Present (NFSDT)SSSC512.014510.30149.32868.46057.85937.5060
Present (NHSDT)12.028810.32719.33818.42237.70167.3440
Present (NFSDT)1013.444211.429210.31469.37018.82628.5087
Present (NHSDT)13.446011.436110.31579.35418.76078.4432
Present (NFSDT)2013.905211.786810.62539.65819.14128.8412
Present (NHSDT)13.905311.788510.62549.65349.12328.8221
Table 10:

Comparison study of the nondimensional fundamental frequency parameter ω¯1 of the simply supported square FG plates on elastic foundation (a/b=1, Kw= Ks=100).

BCa/hp=0p=0.5p=1p=2p=5p=10
Present (NFSDT)SCSC518.188017.165716.643016.254016.102116.0148
Present (NHSDT)18.256117.242216.702616.273516.037115.9581
Present (NFSDT)1020.133018.668317.946117.441117.299417.2019
Present (NHSDT)20.144518.686417.956717.430517.235717.1383
Present (NFSDT)2020.843019.214118.422117.885817.779617.7007
Present (NHSDT)20.844119.217518.423117.879717.754617.6747
Present (NFSDT)SSSC516.700115.952115.591615.364515.363215.3576
Present (NHSDT)16.723115.982015.612915.364715.316615.3155
Present (NFSDT)1017.901616.895516.418416.128916.0140016.1284
Present (NHSDT)17.919416.902716.421816.121616.105516.0936
Present (NFSDT)2018.327617.213616.698016.392016.421916.4188
Present (NHSDT)18.328017.215116.698416.388916.409616.4061

5 Conclusions

A simple, accurate, and unified four-variable formulation for the free vibration analysis of FG plates is introduced. The transverse shear deformations and rotary inertia effects are included, and the shear correction factors are not necessary for the NHSDT. The only assumption of this formulation, despite the other four-variable theories, is the decomposition of the transverse displacement into bending and shear components. Consequently, some new functions are developed for the in-plane displacement component explanation. This theory is free of the assumption of zero in-plane resultant forces used in developing the other four-variable shear deformation theories and hence has the potential to be used for modeling of the nonlinear FG plate problems. It is shown that new four-variable first- and third-order shear deformation theories, as against five variables in the case of the conventional form of these theories, and also CPT can be easily achieved. The equations of motion and the related boundary conditions for the FG plates on two-parameter elastic foundation are derived using Hamilton’s principle. Exact solutions for the simply supported FG plates are extracted. In addition, by extending the application of DQM as an accurate and computationally efficient numerical method, approximate solutions for the FG plates with arbitrary boundary conditions are developed. Comparison studies with the other available two- and three-dimensional solutions in the open literature are performed and excellent agreement is observed. For future studies, extension of this formulation for the nonlinear FG plate problems is suggested.

References

[1] Birman V, Byrd LW. ASME Appl. Mech. Rev. 2007, 60, 195–216.10.1115/1.2777164Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Yang J, Shen HS. Compos. Struct. 2001, 54, 497–508.10.1016/S0263-8223(01)00122-2Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Hasani Baferani A, Saidi AR, Jomehzadeh E. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2011, 225, 526–536.10.1243/09544062JMES2171Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Cheng ZQ, Kitipornchai S. ASCE J. Eng. Mech. 1999, 125, 1293–1297.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1999)125:11(1293)Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Batra RC, Jin J. J. Sound Vib. 2005, 282, 509–516.10.1016/j.jsv.2004.03.068Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Yang J, Shen HS. J. Sound Vib. 2002, 255, 579–602.10.1006/jsvi.2001.4161Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Zhao X, Lee YY, Liew KM. J. Sound Vib. 2009, 319, 918–939.10.1016/j.jsv.2008.06.025Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Hosseini-Hashemi S, Rokni Damavandi T, Akhavan H, Omidi M. Appl. Math. Model. 2010, 34, 1276–1291.10.1016/j.apm.2009.08.008Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Malekzadeh P, Alibeygi Beni A. Compos. Struct. 2010, 92, 2758–2767.10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.04.011Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Hosseini-Hashemi S, Fadaee M, Atashipour SR. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2011, 53, 11–22.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2010.10.002Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Zhu P, Liew KM. Compos. Struct. 2011, 93, 2925–2944.10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.05.011Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Cheng ZQ, Batra RC. J. Sound Vib. 2000, 229, 879–895.10.1006/jsvi.1999.2525Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Ferreira AJM, Batra RC, Roque CMC, Qian LF, Jorge RMN. Compos. Struct. 2006, 75, 593–600.10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.018Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Hosseini-Hashemi S, Fadaee M, Atashipour SR. Compos. Struct. 2011, 93, 722–735.10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.08.007Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Baferani AH, Saidi AR, Ehteshami H. Compos. Struct. 2011, 93, 1842–1853.10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.01.020Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Roque CMC, Ferreira AJM, Jorge RMN. J. Sound Vib. 2007, 300, 1048–1070.10.1016/j.jsv.2006.08.037Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Shahrjerdi A, Bayat M, Mustapha F, Sapuan SM, Zahari R. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2010, 4, 893–905.Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Benachour A, Tahar HD, Atmane HA, Tounsi A, Ahmed MS. Compos. Part B Eng. 2011, 42, 1386–1394.10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.05.032Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Mechab I, Mechab B, Benaissa S. Compos. Part B Eng. 2013, 45, 748–754.10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.015Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Qian LF, Batra RC, Chen LM. Comput. Model Eng. Sci. 2003, 4, 519–534.Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Qian LF, Batra RC, Chen LM. Compos. Part B Eng. 2004, 35, 685–697.10.1016/j.compositesb.2004.02.004Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Matsunaga H. Compos. Struct. 2008, 82, 499–512.10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.01.030Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Fares ME, Elmarghany MK, Atta D. Compos. Struct. 2009, 91, 296–305.10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.05.008Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Talha M, Singh BN. Appl. Math. Model. 2010, 34, 3991–4011.10.1016/j.apm.2010.03.034Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Ait Atmane H, Tounsi A, Mechab I, Bedia EAA. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 2010, 6, 113–121.10.1007/s10999-010-9110-xSuche in Google Scholar

[26] Neves AMA, Ferreira AJM, Carrera E, Cinefra M, Roque CMC, Jorge RMN, Soares CMM. Compos. Struct. 2012, 94, 1814–1825.10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.005Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Neves AMA, Ferreira AJM, Carrera E, Roque CMC, Cinefra M, Jorge RMN, Soares CMM. Compos. Part B Eng. 2012, 43, 711–725.10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.009Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Brischetto S, Tornabene F, Fantuzzi N, Viola E. Meccanica 2016, 51, 2059–2098.10.1007/s11012-016-0361-ySuche in Google Scholar

[29] Akavci SS, Tanrikulu AH. Compos. Part B Eng. 2015, 83, 203–215.10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.043Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Fantuzzi N, Tornabene F, Viola E. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 2016, 23, 89–107.10.1080/15376494.2014.933992Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Reddy JN. Trans. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 1984, 51, 745–752.10.1115/1.3167719Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Shimpi RP. AIAA J. 2002, 40, 137–146.10.2514/2.1622Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Malekzadeh P. Compos. Struct. 2009, 89, 367–373.10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.08.007Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Karami G, Malekzadeh P. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 2003, 56, 847–868.10.1002/nme.590Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Bert CW, Malik M. Appl. Mech. Rev. 1996, 49, 1–27.10.1115/1.3101882Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Malekzadeh P. Compos. Struct. 2008, 83, 189–200.10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.04.007Suche in Google Scholar

[37] Alibeygi Beni A, Malekzadeh P. Compos. Struct. 2012, 94, 3215–3222.10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.04.013Suche in Google Scholar

[38] Setoodeh AR, Ghorbanzadeh M, Malekzadeh P. Proc. IME CJ Mech. Eng. Sci. 2012, 226, 2860–2873.10.1177/0954406212440669Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Tornabene F, Fantuzzi N, Bacciocchi M, Viola E. Compos. Part B Eng. 2016, 89, 187–218.10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.11.016Suche in Google Scholar

[40] Tornabene F, Fantuzzi N, Viola E, Batra RC. Compos. Struct. 2015, 119, 67–89.10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.08.005Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Tornabene F, Fantuzzi N, Bacciocchi M. Compos. Part B Eng. 2014, 67, 490–509.10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.012Suche in Google Scholar

[42] Shariyat M, Asemi K. Compos. Struct. 2016, 142, 57–70.10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.065Suche in Google Scholar

[43] Fazzolari FA, Carrera E. J. Sound Vib. 2014, 333, 1485–1508.10.1016/j.jsv.2013.10.030Suche in Google Scholar

[44] Fazzolari FA. Compos. Struct. 2015, 121, 197–210.10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.10.039Suche in Google Scholar

[45] Fazzolari FA. Compos. Part B Eng. 2016, 89, 408–423.10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.11.031Suche in Google Scholar

[46] Tornabene F, Reddy JN. J. Indian Inst. Sci. 2013, 93, 635–688.Suche in Google Scholar

[47] Tornabene F, Fantuzzi N, Viola E, Reddy JN. Compos. Part B Eng. 2014, 57, 269–296.10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.06.020Suche in Google Scholar

[48] So AH, Kuruoglu N. Thin-Walled Struct. 2016, 102, 68–79.10.1016/j.tws.2016.01.010Suche in Google Scholar

[49] Tornabene F, Fantuzzi N, Bacciocchi M. Fract. Struct. Integr. 2014, 29, 251–265.10.3221/IGF-ESIS.29.22Suche in Google Scholar

[50] Tornabene F, Fantuzzi N, Ubertini F, Viola E. Appl. Mech. Rev. 2015, 67, 020801–020855.10.1115/1.4028859Suche in Google Scholar

[51] Reddy JN. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 2000, 47, 663–684.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000110/30)47:1/3<663::AID-NME787>3.0.CO;2-8Suche in Google Scholar

[52] Bian ZG, Chen WQ, Lim CW, Zhang N. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2005, 42, 6433–6456.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.04.032Suche in Google Scholar

[53] Lü CF, Lim CW, Chen WQ. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 2009, 79, 25–44.10.1002/nme.2555Suche in Google Scholar

[54] Thai HT, Choi DH. Compos. Part B Eng. 2012, 43, 2335–2347.10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.11.062Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-2-1
Accepted: 2016-5-7
Published Online: 2016-9-17
Published in Print: 2018-1-26

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. A model on the curved shapes of unsymmetric laminates including tool-part interaction
  4. Original articles
  5. Enhanced catalytic performance of β-FeOOH by coupling with single-walled carbon nanotubes in a visible-light-Fenton-like process
  6. Investigation of the microstructure and properties of W75-Cu/W55-Cu brazed joint with Cu-Mn-Co filler metal
  7. In situ polymerization approach to poly(arylene ether nitrile)-functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotube composite films: thermal, mechanical, dielectric, and electrical properties
  8. Fabrication and characterization properties of polypropylene/polycarbonate/clay nanocomposites prepared with twin-screw extruder
  9. Torsional vibration of functionally graded carbon nanotube reinforced conical shells
  10. A comparative study performance of cationic organic montmorillonite prepared by different methods
  11. Design and analysis with different substrate materials of a new metamaterial for satellite applications
  12. An investigation on dry sliding wear behaviour of pressure infiltrated AA1050-XMg/B4C composites
  13. Investigation of mechanical performances of composite bolted joints with local reinforcements
  14. Effect of alkali treatment on the flexural properties of a Luffa cylindrica-reinforced epoxy composite
  15. Thermal expansion, electrical conductivity and hardness of Mn3Zn0.5Sn0.5N/Al composites
  16. Effect of modified layered double hydroxide on the flammability and mechanical properties of polypropylene
  17. A unified formulation for free vibration of functionally graded plates
  18. Friction-stir welding of aluminum alloy with an iron-based metal as reinforcing material
  19. Hybridization effect of coir fiber on physico-mechanical properties of polyethylene-banana/coir fiber hybrid composites
  20. Micromechanical properties of unidirectional composites filled with single and clustered shaped fibers
  21. Structure and microwave absorbing properties of carbon-filled ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene
  22. Investigation and optimization of the electro-discharge machining parameters of 2024 aluminum alloy and Al/7.5% Al2O3 particulate-reinforced metal matrix composite
  23. Structural behavior of load-bearing sandwich wall panels with GFRP skin and a foam-web core
  24. Synthesis, thermal and magnetic behavior of iron oxide-polymer nanocomposites
  25. High-temperature damping capacity of fly ash cenosphere/AZ91D Mg alloy composites
  26. Investigation of penetration into woven fabric specimens impregnated with shear thickening fluid
Heruntergeladen am 25.2.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/secm-2016-0031/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen