Home Physical Sciences Effect of mechanical alloying on the synthesis of Fe-TiC nanocomposite
Article Open Access

Effect of mechanical alloying on the synthesis of Fe-TiC nanocomposite

  • Ali Reza Jam , Mansour Razavi EMAIL logo and Leila Nikzad
Published/Copyright: April 12, 2016

Abstract

TiC particulates-reinforced Fe-based nanocomposites were fabricated using ferrotitanium and carbon black powders by mechanical alloying (MA). The raw materials were milled in a planetary ball mill and sampled in different times. The phase type, crystallite size, and mean strain of milled samples were estimated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) instrument. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of milled powders showed that titanium carbide was synthesized gradually after 90 min of milling and its formation was completed after 5 h and the crystallite size of the produced carbide was in nanometer scale. Increasing milling times gave rise to the reduction of crystallite size as well as the augmentation of the mean strain. Microstructural studies confirmed the accuracy of crystallite size calculations by XRD patterns.

1 Introduction

In recent years, metal-matrix composites (MMCs) reinforced with nanoparticles have attracted the attention of researchers because of their potential for structural applications [13]. The Fe-TiC composite is an MMC manufactured by adding titanium carbide particles into a ferrous matrix [48]. Fe-based alloys are the most commonly used metallic materials due to their low cost and good mechanical properties compared to other matrixes, such as Ni and Co. Fe is nontoxic, abundant, and able to be hardened by heat treatment. TiC is considered as a promising reinforcement for Fe-based composites due to its desirable properties, such as high hardness, high melting point, high chemical and thermal stabilities, high wear resistance, and good wettability with iron matrix, where the wetting angle θ between TiC particulates and molten iron is less than 50° even at high temperature and many different atmospheres [912].

Fe-TiC composites have been produced through various routes, such as powder metallurgy (PM), conventional casting, self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS), and in situ reaction technique [10, 13]. In situ techniques involve a chemical reaction resulting in the formation of a very fine and thermodynamically stable ceramic phase within a metal matrix. As a result, the reinforcement surfaces are likely to be free from gas absorption, oxidation, or other detrimental surface reaction contamination; therefore, the interface between the matrix and the reinforcement bond tends to be stronger [14]. Mechanical alloying (MA) technology has been selected as a simple processing method with the incorporation of a hard phase into a metal phase through the blending of powders and then pressing and sintering [15]. Mechanochemical processing (MCP) appears to be an attractive and commercially promising method to the in situ synthesis of Fe-TiC nanocomposites. This method has many advantages, such as applicability to different percentages of reinforcement (TiC), homogeneous distribution of TiC reinforcement in the Fe matrix, creation of high dislocation density, development of small subgrain size, and limited recrystallization, which all result in good mechanical properties [16, 17].

To achieve the superior properties in nanocomposite, the reinforcement should be well distributed in the matrix, which is obtainable for in situ synthesis methods [16, 18]. There are two mechanisms for TiC formation during in situ synthesis: mechanically induced self-propagating reaction (MSR) and a gradual diffusion where, depending on which mechanism controls the reaction, the size of TiC crystallites can be changed.

Generally, the size of grains by MA depends on the dynamic competition between dislocation accumulation rate and reversion rate. The dislocation accumulation rate is dominant under diffusing mechanism [19]. Therefore, if using gradual diffusion, the crystallite size of TiC is finer compared to MSR.

In the present work, it has been tried to fabricate a nanocomposite powder (Fe-83 vol.% TiC) by MA with ferrotitanium and carbon as cheap raw materials.

2 Materials and methods

The starting powders were ferrotitanium (with 72% Ti) with a mean particle size of less than 45 μm and amorphous carbon black with high purity (99%) and 0.5 μm particle size. For the production of nanocomposite, the powders were milled according to the following reaction:

(1)FeTi+Ti+2C=Fe+2TiC (1)

Correspondingly, the reaction product consists of the TiC-83 vol.%-Fe composite. The MA of the starting powders was carried out in the range of 0 to 20 h by comilling reactants in a Retsch planetary ball mill (model PM400) under argon atmosphere using stainless steel jars and balls (20 mm diameter chrome steel). In all runs, the vial rotation speed was approximately 300 rpm, whereas the weight ratio of ball to powder was maintained constant at 10. Stearic acid (1 wt.%) was used to reduce cold welding and promote the fracturing of the powders. The mechanism of synthesis was evaluated by monitoring the change of vial inside temperature and pressure during milling and solid-state reaction.

The phase identification, crystallite size, and mean strain of synthesized powders were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) instrument (Siemens model) using CuKα radiation operating at 30 kV and 25 mA. The crystallite size and mean strain of the synthesized material were determined by the Williamson-Hall method according to relation (2) [20]. By plotting β cos θ (where β is the width at half-maximum intensity and θ is the Bragg angle) against sin θ, a straight line was obtained from which the crystal size D (intercept) and lattice strain ε (slope) were obtained:

(2)βcosθ=0.9λD+εsinθ (2)

For obtaining instrumental contribution to the line broadening and elimination of it, samples with large grains and free from defect were used as standard.

These samples include nonmilled initial powders and fully synthesized Fe-TiC, which were annealed at argon atmosphere furnace for 24 h in 1000°C. Also, using the Nelson-Riley method [21], the influence of milling time on lattice parameter could be considered by Equation (3):

(3)F(θ)=12(cos2θsinθ+cos2θθ) (3)

where F(θ) is the Nelson-Riely function. The lattice parameter of TiC is 0.4327 nm in accordance to the file of 73-0472 of the International Center for Diffraction Date (JCPDS-ICDD 2000). The morphology of the selected mechanically alloyed powders was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Cambridge model) with a voltage of 25 kV.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Phase identification and XRD evaluation

The equilibrium phase diagram of Fe-Ti is shown in Figure 1. From Figure 1 and the semiquantitative analysis of ferrotitanium that has been achieved by XRD (Table 1), it can be assumed that FeTi and Ti phases should be in ferrotitanium at room temperature.

Figure 2 illustrates the XRD patterns of mixture and milled sample at room temperature for different milling times. The XRD pattern of unmilled (0 h) powders confirmed that FeTi (reference code: 19-0636) and Ti (reference code: 01-1197) are observable phases in ferrotitanium. Also, it should be noted that the reflection characteristic of carbon is present in the XRD patterns. Dyjak et al. [23] expressed that a peak of approximately 2θ≈26° in the TiC sample indicates that any carbon in the sample is amorphous. After 60 min of MA, carbon peaks disappear. This is attributed to the solid-state diffusion of the C atoms into the lattice of hcp-Ti, which have small atomic radius. At the same time, because of the formation of TiC and the reduction of iron, the FeTi peak intensity reduces and broadens continuously. The position of the peak for the milled sample shifted to higher diffraction angle compared to the initial mixed powder. These phenomena indicate that TiC nanoparticles have very large lattice distortion and low degree of crystallinity. With the progress of milling up to 90 min, the strongest peaks of TiC appeared, which imply the formation of Fe-TiC nanocomposite particles. By reaching to 5 h of milling, all of the raw materials’ peaks disappeared completely, and the visible peaks in the patterns correspond to TiC and α-iron phases (ferrite with reference code: 06-0696). By increasing the milling time to 20 h, the XRD pattern shows an observable peak broadening. The peak broadening is caused by grain refinement, the presence of the internal strain, and local correlated disorders. This is due to the large number of dislocations that resulted from heavy deformation caused by high-energy MA [24].

Figure 1: Equilibrium phase diagram of Fe-Ti [22].
Figure 1:

Equilibrium phase diagram of Fe-Ti [22].

Table 1:

Chemical composition of ferrotitanium.

TiFeCSiPSAlV
Elemental wt.%72.1327.10.0820.1140.0120.0140.3510.211
Figure 2: XRD pattern of Fe-TiC nanocomposite at different times.
Figure 2:

XRD pattern of Fe-TiC nanocomposite at different times.

3.2 Thermodynamic studies

In a system containing titanium and carbon black powders, an MSR would not occur unless Tadd>2500 K [25], although MSR was observed earlier in several cases of TiC formation [21, 26, 27]. Razavi et al. [28] calculated the adiabatic temperature for the formation of 1 mol TiC by an initial reactant of Ti and carbon black of approximately 3460.2 K. It seems that although the reaction of Ti+C=TiC has sufficient adiabatic temperature, as seen in Figure 3, because of no distinguishable change in temperature and pressure during milling, no evidence of combustion synthesis has found. Therefore, the existence of FeTi at ferrotitanium gives rise to a gradual diffusion mechanism of TiC synthesis contrary to TiC formation with combustion mechanism from titanium and carbon. Also, the adiabatic temperature was calculated at 2182 K for TiC formation from FeTi and carbon black [28]. Thus, as expected in the present work, the formation of Fe-TiC is governed by a gradual reaction mechanism during the milling of ferrotitanium and carbon.

Figure 3: Dependence of the vial temperature and pressure on the ball milling time.
Figure 3:

Dependence of the vial temperature and pressure on the ball milling time.

The equilibrium formation temperature of TiC from ferrotitanium can be calculated theoretically [29]. The Ellingham-Richardson diagrams of the formation reaction of TiC from two paths (reaction) with the amount of Gibbs free energy are shown in Figure 4. The Fe-TiC composite is more stable than TiC due to its lower Gibbs free energy function. At approximately 2044°C, free titanium reacts with carbon and produces TiC, and the reaction will continue until the reaction is completed for temperature of more than 2044°C. Mechanical activation can decrease the formation temperature of TiC. In fact, by MA, the raw materials are activated and reacted sooner than nonmilled samples.

Figure 4: Ellingham-Richardson diagram for the formation reaction of TiC and Fe/TiC.
Figure 4:

Ellingham-Richardson diagram for the formation reaction of TiC and Fe/TiC.

3.3 Structural evaluation

The grain size of TiC can be calculated by the Williamson-Hall method as shown in Table 2 and Figure 5. The results of these calculations are presented in Figure 6, which indicates that increasing milling times have reduced the crystallite size of TiC. After 20 h of milling, the crystallite size has decreased to 7 nm. For the case of lattice strain, the milling times up to 15 h have increased strain. However, after 15 h of milling, because of the strain release as a consequence of heat generated by collisions and friction between balls and particles during milling, strain has decreased [30].

Table 2:

Mean size of the particles and the strain caused by milling in accordance to the Williamson-Hall equation for TiC after 3 to 20 h of milling.

Milling time (h)y=ax+bdTiC (nm)ηTiC (%)R2
ab
30.01660.009151.660.94
50.01680.0104131.680.99
100.01790.0133101.790.99
150.01210.015691.210.96
200.00780.020470.780.99
Figure 5: Williamson-Hall diagram of milled samples.
Figure 5:

Williamson-Hall diagram of milled samples.

Figure 6: Variation of crystallite size and strain in the Fe-TiC system by milling time.
Figure 6:

Variation of crystallite size and strain in the Fe-TiC system by milling time.

3.4 Morphology of powders

The variations of size and morphology of the selected mechanically alloyed powders after milling for 1, 1.30, 3, 5, 10, and 20 h are shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7: SEM images of (A) no milling and (B) 1.30 h, (C) 3 h, (D) 5 h, (E) 10 h, and (F) 20 h of milling.
Figure 7:

SEM images of (A) no milling and (B) 1.30 h, (C) 3 h, (D) 5 h, (E) 10 h, and (F) 20 h of milling.

Figure 7 shows that both ferrotitanium and carbon powders have an irregular shape. During high-energy milling, the powder particles are repeatedly flattened, cold welded, fractured, and rewelded. The powders are gradually strain hardened, whereas the fracture mechanism becomes dominant, which results in a general decrease in size with milling time. The powder size reduction will be stopped when the steady rates of cold welding and fracture are reached. In the early stage of milling, the fracture of large particles happens by entrapping within the milling media, especially using PCA and carbon black within ferrotitanium powder [31]. With further milling time, because the starting powder particles are soft, the powders are flattened as a flake after 1 h of milling and welded together due to the impacts of grinding balls to form larger particles, as shown in Figure 7B. As the milling time increased to 1.30 h, when, according to XRD patterns (Figure 2), TiC nuclei are formed gradually (Figure 7C), finer particles with irregular flake begin to shape. After 5 h of milling, when the TiC formation has been completed (with considering XRD pattern; Figure 2), TiC particles with size of less than 2 μm and wide distribution are visible.

The small hard brittle particles in the matrix act as milling agents, which reduces the steady-state milling time, until a steady state is established between the rate of fracturing and cold welding. As shown in Figure 7D–F, by increasing the milling time up to 15 h, well spreading and grain refinement of the powders are attained; at milling times of more than 15 h, this condition is not observed because of the agglomeration of the powders. Also, when the milling duration rises up to 20 h, the particles reach a value of 10 to 100 nm in size (Figure 7F).

3.5 Lattice parameter

The lattice parameter of TiC powders obtained from 5 and 20 h of milling were calculated by the Nelson-Riley method from the XRD analysis. The results are shown in Table 3 and Figure 8. The increasing milling time from 5 to 20 h cause the reduction of lattice parameter. Also, for both times, there is a deviation from the ideal size of lattice parameter (0.4327 nm). This deviation can be related to the increase in the amount of strain, formation of TiC with nonstoichiometric ratio, and lack of calibration of instruments [32].

Figure 8: Changes of the lattice parameter in TiC system based on the Nelson-Riley function in the milling times of 5 and 20 h.
Figure 8:

Changes of the lattice parameter in TiC system based on the Nelson-Riley function in the milling times of 5 and 20 h.

Table 3:

Calculation of lattice parameter of TiC after 5 and 20 h of milling (aexp and aST: experimental and standard lattice parameter, respectively).

Milling time (h)y=ax+bR2aST-aexp (nm)
ab=aexp (nm)
50.0034.29740.990.0296
200.0044.28290.950.0421

4 Conclusion

  1. Fe-TiC nanocomposite was synthesized at short times from ferrotitanium and carbon black.

  2. The formation of Fe-TiC was governed by a gradual reaction mechanism during milling.

  3. The crystallite sizes of synthesized titanium carbide were in nanometer scale. Prolonging the milling time up to 20 h resulted in a decrease of grain size to nanoscale along with the increasing strain and a slight decrease in the lattice parameter of TiC phase.

References

[1] Chawla KK. Composite Materials: Science and Engineering, 3rd ed., Springer: New York, 2012.10.1007/978-0-387-74365-3Search in Google Scholar

[2] Kim JM, Park JS, Yun HS. Strength Mater. 2014, 46, 177–182.10.1007/s11223-014-9533-ySearch in Google Scholar

[3] Nishida Y. Introduction to Metal Matrix Composites: Fabrication and Recycling. Springer: New York, 2013.10.1007/978-4-431-54237-7Search in Google Scholar

[4] Wang Z, Lin T, He X, Shao H, Zheng J, Qu X. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 650, 918–924.10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.08.047Search in Google Scholar

[5] Miracle DB. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 2526–2540.10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.027Search in Google Scholar

[6] Brown IWM, Owers WR. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2004, 4, 171–174.10.1016/j.cap.2003.11.001Search in Google Scholar

[7] Jing W, Yisan W. Mater. Lett. 2007. 61, 4393–4395.10.1016/j.matlet.2007.02.011Search in Google Scholar

[8] Mei Z, Yan YW, Cui K. Mater. Lett. 2003, 57, 3175–3181.10.1016/S0167-577X(03)00020-XSearch in Google Scholar

[9] Zhu H, Dong K, Wang H, Hauang J, Li J, Xie Z. Powder Technol. 2013, 246, 456–461.10.1016/j.powtec.2013.06.002Search in Google Scholar

[10] Zhong L, Xu Y, Hojamberdiev, Wang J, Wang J. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 3790–3795.10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.031Search in Google Scholar

[11] Dufour LC, Monty C. Surfaces and Interfaces of Ceramic Materials. Springer: France, 1988.10.1007/978-94-009-1035-5Search in Google Scholar

[12] Alvaredo P, Mari D, Gordo E. Int. J. Refract. Hard Met. 2013, 41, 115–120.10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2013.02.012Search in Google Scholar

[13] Li, B, Liu Y, Cao H, He L, Li J. Mater. Lett. 2009, 63, 2010–2012.10.1016/j.matlet.2009.06.026Search in Google Scholar

[14] Zhang X, Lu W, Zhang D, Fang P. Scr. Mater. 1999, 41, 39–46.10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00087-1Search in Google Scholar

[15] Soni PR. Mechanical Alloying: Fundamentals and Applications. Cambridge, UK, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Sopicka-Lizer M. High-Energy Ball Milling: Mechanochemical Processing of Nanopowders. Elsevier: Poland, 2010.10.1533/9781845699444Search in Google Scholar

[17] Tuan N, Khoa H, Vieta N, Lee Y, Lee B, Kim J. Kor. Powder Met. Inst. 2013, 20, 338–344.10.4150/KPMI.2013.20.5.338Search in Google Scholar

[18] Sheikhzadeh M, Sanjabi S. Mater. Des. 2012, 39, 366–372.10.1016/j.matdes.2012.02.011Search in Google Scholar

[19] Yuan Q, Zheng Y, Yu H, Int. J. Refract. Hard Met. 2009, 27, 696–700.10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2008.11.003Search in Google Scholar

[20] Williamson G, Hall W. Acta Mater. 1953, 1, 22–31.10.1016/0001-6160(53)90006-6Search in Google Scholar

[21] Lohse B, Calka A, Wexler D. J. Alloys Compd. 2005, 394, 148–151.10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.09.074Search in Google Scholar

[22] ASM Handbook Volume 3: Alloy Phase Diagrams. ASM International, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Dyjak S, Norek M, Polanski M, Cudzilo S, Bystrzycki J. Int. J. Refract. Hard Met. 2013, 38, 87–91.10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2013.01.004Search in Google Scholar

[24] Ren R, Yang Z, Shaw L. Scr. Mater. 1998, 38, 735–741.10.1016/S1359-6462(97)00552-6Search in Google Scholar

[25] Vallauri D, Adrian I, Chrysanthou A. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2008, 28, 1697–1713.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.11.011Search in Google Scholar

[26] El-Eskandarany M, Al-Hazza M. Mater. Charact. 2014, 97, 92–100.10.1016/j.matchar.2014.09.005Search in Google Scholar

[27] Takacs L. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2002, 47, 355–414.10.1016/S0079-6425(01)00002-0Search in Google Scholar

[28] Razavi M, Ghaderi R, Rahimipour M, Ostad Shabani M. Mater. Manuf. Processes 2012, 27, 1310–1314.10.1080/10426914.2012.663142Search in Google Scholar

[29] Gaskell DR. Introduction to the Thermodynamics of Materials, 5th ed., Taylor & Francis: New York, 2012.10.4324/9780203428498Search in Google Scholar

[30] Zhang F, Lu L, Lai M, Fros F. J. Mater. Sci. 2003, 38, 613–619.10.1023/A:1021870530302Search in Google Scholar

[31] Rahaei M, Kazemzadeh A, Ebadzadeh T. Powder Technol. 2012, 217, 369–376.10.1016/j.powtec.2011.10.050Search in Google Scholar

[32] Razavi M, Rahimipour M, Rajabi-Zamani A. J. Alloys Compd. 2007, 436, 142–145.10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.07.018Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-9-25
Accepted: 2016-3-2
Published Online: 2016-4-12
Published in Print: 2017-9-26

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Automated profile preforming for structural components
  4. Original articles
  5. Effects of surface grafting of copper nanoparticles on the tensile and bonding properties of flax fibers
  6. Thermomechanical study of polyethylene porous membrane by coating silicon dioxide nanoparticles
  7. Crystallization, structural and mechanical properties of PA6/PC/NBR ternary blends: effect of NBR-g-GMA compatibilizer and organoclay
  8. Aging analysis of high voltage silicone rubber/silica nanocomposites under accelerated weathering conditions
  9. Investigation of viscoelastic properties and thermal behavior of photocurable epoxy acrylate nanocomposites
  10. The research of soft matter properties by light scattering material adding drop additive
  11. Microstructure and corrosion properties of SiC/Al-Mg-Cu-Si-Sn composites
  12. Tribological properties and microstructures of Al2O3-TiC-TiB2 reinforced composites
  13. Sustained release of OIC-A006 from PLGA microspheres to induce osteogenesis of composite PLGA/β-TCP scaffolds
  14. Study the effect of fiber loading and alkali treatment on the mechanical and water absorption properties of wheat straw fiber-reinforced epoxy composites
  15. Effect of mechanical alloying on the synthesis of Fe-TiC nanocomposite
  16. A comparative finite element analysis of two types of axial and radial functionally graded dental implants with titanium one around implant-bone interface
  17. Investigation of the effect of inert inclusions on densification during solid-state sintering of metal matrix composites
  18. Multiscale thermomechanical modeling of short fiber-reinforced composites
  19. Effects of the alkaline solution/binder ratio and curing condition on the mechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash mortars
  20. Failure analysis and strengthening mechanism of Z-pinned composite T-joints under tensile loading
  21. Characteristic analysis of carbon nanotube thread embedded into three-dimensional braided composite under bending load
Downloaded on 4.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/secm-2015-0410/html
Scroll to top button