Home Physical Sciences Fluoride in water, health implications and plant-based remediation strategies
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Fluoride in water, health implications and plant-based remediation strategies

  • Justin K. Maghanga , Veronica A. Okello EMAIL logo , Justine A. Michira , Loice Ojwang , Bancy Mati and Fred K. Segor
Published/Copyright: October 31, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The high prevalence of dental fluorosis and bone mineralization deficiency as a result of exposure to fluorides has increased in Kenya over the years due to consumption of water with elevated levels of fluoride. The World Health Organization (WHO) provides a guideline of 1.5 mg/L level of fluoride in drinking water. However, majority of studies carried out in Kenya over the last 40 plus years have indicated very high levels of fluoride in drinking water in various regions, with a prevalence in dental fluorosis observed in children and adults living in Rift valley and central regions due to basaltic and volcanic rocks. Unfortunately, this trend of fluoride-induced enamel changes has been observed in other regions such as Nairobi and Machakos which were originally presumed to contain low fluoride levels. This study sought to analyse the applicability of Maerua subcordata root powder (MSRP) in the removal of fluorides in borehole drinking water. Fresh Maerua subcordata roots were peeled to obtain the white flesh, chopped into small pieces, dried and ground into powder. The process parameters varied were; fluoride ion concentration [F] (0–12 mg/L), adsorbent dosage (0–200 g/L) and equilibration time (30–240 min) [F] were hence analysed before and after treatment using ion selective electrode (ISE) fluoride meter. Results indicated that MSRP is a viable plant in fluoride treatment with approximately 68% fluoride ion removal efficiency. An MSRP dosage of 200 g/L was found optimal in [F] reduction while a 2 mg/L [F] concentration recorded the highest reduction of [F]. The optimal equilibration time was found to be 30 min. The results can be used to develop a low-cost column for treatment of high fluoride waters in rural areas using MSRP. Borehole samples were treated with MSRP using the optimized conditions; however their reduction levels were lower than the [F] standards used. It is envisaged that with further modification and/or doping with zero-valent iron nanoparticles, it’s efficiency will be improved.


Corresponding author: Veronica A. Okello, Machakos University, P.O Box 136-90100 Machakos, Kenya, E-mail:

Funding source: The Upper Tana Nairobi Water Fund-Jkuat Research Component in collaboration with The Nature Conservancy (TNC)

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. WHO News. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/18-06-2019-1-in-3-people-globally-do-not-have-access-to-safe-drinking-water-unicef-who [Accessed 23 May 2022].Search in Google Scholar

2. EUROPA Public Health: Fluoridation. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/opinions_layman/fluoridation/en/l-2/3.htm [Accessed 23 May 2022].Search in Google Scholar

3. Kumar, R, Sinha, R, Sharma, PK, Ivy, N, Kumar, P, Kant, N, et al.. Bioaccumulation of fluoride in plants and its microbially assisted remediation: a review of biological processes and technological performance. Processes 2021;9:2154. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9122154.Search in Google Scholar

4. D’Alessandro, W. Human fluorosis related to volcanic activity: a review. environmental toxicology, Kungolos, AG, Brebbla, CA, Samaras, CP, Popov, VWIT, editors. Wessex Institute of Technology, UK: WIT Press; 2006, vol. 10:21–30 pp.10.2495/ETOX060031Search in Google Scholar

5. Thole, B. Ground water contamination with fluoride and potential fluoride removal technologies for East and Southern Africa, Ahmad, I, Dar, MA, editors. Vienna, Austria: Intech Open; 2013.10.5772/54985Search in Google Scholar

6. Yadav, M, Singh, G, Jadeja, R. Pollution and remediation methods. In: Sughosh, M, Pardeep, S, editors. Fluoride contamination in groundwater, impacts, and their potential remediation techniques, 1st ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2021:22–41 pp. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352117699_Fluoride_Contamination_in_Groundwater_Impacts_and_Their_Potential_Remediation_Techniques [Accessed 12 Oct 2022].10.1002/9781119709732.ch2Search in Google Scholar

7. Linhares, DPS, Garcia, PV, Rodrigues, ADS. Chapter 4: Fluoride in volcanic areas: a case study in medical geology, 3rd ed. Vienna, Austria: Intechopen; 2019.Search in Google Scholar

8. García, MG, Borgnino, L. Chapter 1: fluoride in the context of the environment. In: Victor, RP, editor. Fluorine: chemistry, analysis, function and effects; 2015:3–21 pp.10.1039/9781782628507-00003Search in Google Scholar

9. Kebede, A, Retta, N, Abuye, C, Whiting, S, Kassaw, M, Zeru, T, et al.. Dietary fluoride intake and associated skeletal and dental fluorosis in school age children in rural Ethiopian Rift valley. Int J Environ Res 2016;13:756. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13080756.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Cao, J, Zhao, Y, Liu, J, Xirao, R, Danzeng, S, Daji, D, et al.. Brick tea fluoride as a main source of adult fluorosis. Food Chem Toxicol 2003;41:535–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-6915(02)00285-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Yuyan, X, Hua, H, Qibing, Z, Chun, Y, Maolin, Y, Feng, H, et al.. The effect of elemental content on the risk of dental fluorosis and the exposure of the environment and population to fluoride produced by coal-burning. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 2017;56:329–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2017.10.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. UNEP, WHO. Endemic fluorosis-a global health issue, a technical report for the human exposure assessment locations project. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme & World Health Organization; 1992.Search in Google Scholar

13. Choudhary, S, Rani, M, Devika, OS, Patra, A, Singh, RK, Prasad, SK. Impact of fluoride on agriculture: a review on its sources, toxicity in plants and mitigation strategies. Int J Chem Stud 2019;7:1675–80.Search in Google Scholar

14. D’Addabbo, M, Sulpizio, R, Guidi, M, Capitani, G, Mantecca, P, Zanchetta, G. Ash leachates from some recent eruptions of Mount Etna (Italy) and Popocatépetl (Mexico) volcanoes and their impact on amphibian living freshwater organisms. Biogeosci Discuss 2015;12:7087–106. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-7087-2015.Search in Google Scholar

15. Edmunds, WM, Smedley, PL. Chapter: essentials of medical geology. Fluoride in natural waters. In: Selinus, O, Alloway, B, Centeno, JA, Finkelman, RB, Fuge, R, Lindh, U, editors, et al.. Essentials of medical geology, 2nd ed. Manhattan, NYC: Springer; 2013:311–36 pp.Search in Google Scholar

16. Ranjan, R, Ranjan, A. Fluoride toxicity in animals. Springer Cham; 2015:1–9 pp.10.1007/978-3-319-17512-6_1Search in Google Scholar

17. Kimambo, V, Bhattacharya, P, Mtalo, F, Mtamba, J, Ahmad, A. Fluoride occurrence in groundwater systems at global scale and status of defluoridation- State of the art. Groundw Sustain Dev 2019;9:100223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100223.Search in Google Scholar

18. Malago, J, Makoba, E, Muzuka, ANN. Fluoride levels in surface and groundwater in Africa: a review. Water Sci Eng 2017;3:1–17. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajwse.20170301.11.Search in Google Scholar

19. Li, L, Luo, K, Tang, Y, Liu, Y. The daily fluorine and arsenic intake for residents with different dietaries and fluorosis risk in coal-burning fluorosis area, Yunnan, Southwest China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2015;22:2031–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3485-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. ATSDR. Tox Guide for fluorides, hydrogen fluoride and fluorine; 2003. Available from: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxguides/toxguide-11.pdf [Accessed 23 May 2022].Search in Google Scholar

21. Bajraktarova-Valjakova, E, Korunoska-Stevkovska, V, Georgieva, S, Ivanovski, K, Bajraktarova-Misevska, C, Mijoska, A, et al.. Hydrofluoric acid: burns and systemic toxicity, protective measures, immediate and hospital medical treatment. Macedonian J Med Sci 2018;6:2257–69. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.429.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Erdal, S, Buchanan, SN. A quantitative look at fluorosis, fluoride exposure, and intake in children using a health risk assessment approach. Environ Health Perspect 2005;113:111–7. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7077.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. European food safety authority panel on dietetic products, nutrition, and allergies (EFSA NDA). EFSA J 2013;11:1–46.Search in Google Scholar

24. Jha, SK, Singh, RK, Damodaran, T, Mishra, VK, Sharma, DK, Rai, D. Fluoride in groundwater: toxicological exposure and remedies. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 2013;16:52–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2013.769420.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Organization WH. Inadequate or excess fluoride: a major public health concern. Geneva: WHO Public Health and Environment; 2010.Search in Google Scholar

26. Waghmare, SS, Arfin, T. Fluoride removal from water by various techniques: review. Int J Innov Sci Eng Technol 2015;2:560–71.Search in Google Scholar

27. Green remediation: incorporating sustainable environmental practices into remediation of contaminated sites 2008. EPA 542-R-08-002:1-56.Search in Google Scholar

28. Shivani, R, Sow, S. Phytoremediation: an eco-friendly approach towards clean and green future. J Pharm Innov 2021;10:839–50. https://doi.org/10.22271/tpi.2021.v10.i3l.5890.Search in Google Scholar

29. Shubha, D, Prasenjit, M, Chandrajit, B. Removal of fluoride using citrus limetta in batch reactor: kinetics and equilibrium studies. Res J Chem 2014;4:50–8.Search in Google Scholar

30. Yadav, S, Yadav, A, Bagotia, N, Sharma, AK, Kumar, S. Adsorptive potential of modified plant-based adsorbents for sequestration of dyes and heavy metals from wastewater – a review. J Water Proc Eng 2021;42:102148.10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102148Search in Google Scholar

31. Bharali, RK, Bhattacharyya, KG. Biosorption of fluoride on Neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf powder. J Environ Chem Eng 2015;3:662–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.02.007.Search in Google Scholar

32. Yadav, AK, Abbassi, R, Gupta, A, Dadashzadeh, M. Removal of fluoride from aqueous solution and groundwater by wheat straw, sawdust and activated bagasse carbo of sugarcane. Ecol 2013;52:211–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.069.Search in Google Scholar

33. Bazanella, GC, da Silva, GF, Vieira, A, Bergamasco, R. Fluoride removal from water using combined moringa oleifera/ultrafiltration process. Water Air & Soil Poll 2012;223:6083–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-012-1342-y.Search in Google Scholar

34. Shabaa, GJ, Al-Jboory, WSH, Sabre, HM, Alazmi, A, Kareem, MM, AlKhayyat, A. Plant-based coagulants for water treatment. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2021;1058:012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1058/1/012001.Search in Google Scholar

35. Prichard, M, Craven, T, Mkandawire, T, O’Neill, JG. A study of the parameters affecting the effectiveness of moringa oleifera in drinking water purification, Phys Chem Earth A/B/C 2010;35:791–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2010.07.020.Search in Google Scholar

36. Megersa, M, Beyene, A, Ambelu, A, Woldeab, B. The use of indigenous plant species for drinking water treatment in developing countries: a review. J Biodivers Environ Sci 2014;5:269–81.Search in Google Scholar

37. Suneetha, M, Sundar, BS, Ravindhranath, K. Removal of fluoride from polluted waters using active carbon derived from barks of vitexnegundo plant. J Anal Sci Technol 2015;6:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40543-014-0042-1.Search in Google Scholar

38. Royal botanical gardens KEW. Available from: https://www.kew.org [Accessed 25 May 2022].Search in Google Scholar

39. Kangor, WS, Ayabei, K, Lutta, S, Maiyoh, G. Investigation of novel plant maerua shrub (Maerua subcordata) for cheap and efficient bioethanol production in Kenya. J Agric Chem Envt 2021;10:3. https://doi.org/10.4236/jacen.2021.103019.Search in Google Scholar

40. Hiben, MG, Louisse, J, de Haan, LHJ, Rietjens, IMC. Ethnomedicine and ethnobotany of Maerua subcordata (gilg) DeWolf. J Ethn Foods 2019;6:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42779-019-0032-4.Search in Google Scholar

41. APHA. Standard methods for examination of water and waste water, 21st ed. Washington D.C: Scientific Research; 2005.Search in Google Scholar

42. Government of Kenya, Kenya population situation analysis; 2013. Available from: https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/admin-resource/FINALPSAREPORT_0.pdf [Accessed 23 May 2022].Search in Google Scholar

43. Dong, H, Yang, X, Zhang, S, Wang, X, Guo, C, Zhang, X, et al.. Associations of low level of fluoride exposure with dental fluorosis among U.S. children and adolescents, NHANES 2015–2016. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2021;221:112439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112439.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

44. Kenya Bureau of Standards (KEBS). Specifications for drinking water. Part one: the requirements for drinking water, 3rd ed. Nairobi, Kenya: KBS; 2007.Search in Google Scholar

45. Kenya News Agency. Available from: https://www.kenyanews.go.ke/thika-needs-additional-15000-m3-of-water-to-end-crisis [Accessed 30 Aug 2022].Search in Google Scholar

46. The star daily newspaper Kenya, Sh11bn project to end perennial water shortage in Thika. Available from: https://www.the-star.co.ke/counties/central/2022-03-06-sh11bn-project-to-end-perennial-water-shortage-in-thika/ [Accessed 30 Aug 2022].Search in Google Scholar

47. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pOkbJozB6c.; 2021.Search in Google Scholar

48. The National Academies Report. Fluoride in drinking water, a scientific review of EPA’s standards, The National Academies Press, 500 Fifth street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20001; 2006.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-05-29
Accepted: 2022-08-31
Published Online: 2022-10-31

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Topology and applications of 2D Dirac and semi-Dirac materials
  4. Landscape ecological modeling to identify ecologically significant regions in Tumkur district, Karnataka
  5. Surfactants-surface active agents behind sustainable living
  6. Ecological footprint of poultry production and effect of environment on poultry genes
  7. Fluoride in water, health implications and plant-based remediation strategies
  8. Poultry nutrition
  9. Synthesis of N-containing heterocycles in water
  10. Inorganic nanoparticles promoted synthesis of heterocycles
  11. The role of analytical chemistry in poultry science
  12. Antibiotics in avian care and husbandry-status and alternative antimicrobials
  13. Removal of heavy metals from wastewater using synthetic chelating agents
  14. Azadirachtin in the aquatic environment: Fate and effects on non-target fauna
  15. Intensification of bioprocesses with filamentous microorganisms
  16. The science of genetically modified poultry
  17. Emerging in ovo technologies in poultry production and the re-discovered chicken model in preclinical research
  18. The Cambridge structural database (CSD): important resources for teaching concepts in structural chemistry and intermolecular interactions
  19. Microbial production of lactic acid using organic wastes as low-cost substrates
  20. Oxalic acid: recent developments for cost-effective microbial production
  21. Immobilization of α-amylase from Aspergillus fumigatus using adsorption method onto zeolite
  22. A comparative assessment of potentially harmful metals in the Lagos Lagoon and Ogun river catchment
  23. Formulation of a herbal topical cream against Tinea capitis using flavonoids glycosides from Dicerocaryum senecioides and Diospyros mespiliformis
  24. Biodegradable polymers – research and applications
  25. Adsorption of trichloroacetic acid from drinking water using polyethylene terephthalate waste carbon and periwinkle shells–based chitosan
  26. The vital use of isocyanide-based multicomponent reactions (MCR) in chemical synthesis
  27. Pine bark crosslinked to cyclodextrin for the adsorption of 2-nitrophenol from an aqueous solution
  28. Computational study of propene selectivity and yield in the dehydrogenation of propane via process simulation approach
  29. A mini review on the prospects of Fagara zanthoxyloides extract based composites: a remedy for COVID-19 and associated replica?
  30. Physicochemical assessment and insilico studies on the interaction of 5-HT2c receptor with herbal medication bioactive compounds used in the treatment of premature ejaculation
  31. Horse chestnut thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  32. Rice thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
Downloaded on 25.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psr-2022-0123/pdf
Scroll to top button