Home Physical Sciences Computational study of propene selectivity and yield in the dehydrogenation of propane via process simulation approach
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Computational study of propene selectivity and yield in the dehydrogenation of propane via process simulation approach

  • Toyese Oyegoke ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Fadimatu N. Dabai , Saidu M. Waziri , Adamu Uzairu and Baba Y. Jibril
Published/Copyright: February 22, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Propene is a vital feedstock in the petrochemical industry with a vast range of applications. And there is a continuous rise in propene demand. To gain insight into how the on-purpose method could help meet the demand in the propene market, we investigated the impact of temperature (T) and pressure (P) on product distribution in terms of product yield and selectivity using the process simulation approach. Existing related studies were deployed to identify possible products that could be evaluated in the simulation. In the study, we used Gibbs minimization (with Gibb’s reactor) to predict the likely products obtained at different T and P. The impact of feed purity on product distribution was also evaluated. The study was aided by using the Aspen HYSYS process simulator, while Design Expert was used to search for the optimum conditions for higher conversion, yield, and selectivity. Results obtained for the modeling and simulation of the process show that operating the production process at a lower pressure would favor higher selectivity within the temperature range of 500–600 °C. In comparison, the one run at a higher pressure was predicted to be only promising, showing better selectivity within the range of 550–650 °C. The feed purity significantly impacts the propene amount, especially for one with sulfur impurity, leading to the formation of smaller olefins and sulfide compounds. Our study reveals the importance of reviewing feed purity before charging them into the dehydrogenation reactor to prevent poisoning, coking, and other activities, which do lead to undesired products like methane and ethylene. A catalyst can also be designed to efficiently dehydrogenate the propane to propene at a lower temperature to prevent side reactions.


Corresponding author: Toyese Oyegoke, Chemical Engineering Department, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria 234, Nigeria, E-mail:

Funding source: Petroleum Development Technology Fund Abuja Nigeria

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Fortune Business, Insights. Polypropylene market size, share & trends | report. Fortune Business Insight report 2022. Available from: https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/polypropylene-pp-market-101583 [Accessed 29 Oct 2022].Search in Google Scholar

2. Propylene market destine to reach USD 135.21 billion with. GlobeNewswire report 2022. Available from: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2022/07/18/2481422/0/en/Propylene-Market-Destine-to-Reach-USD-135-21-Billion-with-Size-Share-Industry-Growth-Rate-Demand-Revenue-Forecast-By-2029.html [Accessed 29 Oct 2022].Search in Google Scholar

3. Clariant, P. Analysis of alternatives and socio-economic analysis: the use of chromium trioxide in a catalyst for the dehydrogenation of propane to propene. Deutschland: Apeiron-Team NV, The Economics Interface Limited Economics for the Environment Consultancy (EFTEC); 2016.Search in Google Scholar

4. Li, CF, Guo, X, Shang, QH, Yan, X, Ren, C, Lang, WZ, et al.. Defective TiO2 for propane dehydrogenation. Ind Eng Chem Res 2020;59:4377–87. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b06759.Search in Google Scholar

5. Jibril, BY. Propane oxidative dehydrogenation over chromium oxide-based catalysts. Appl Catal Gen 2004;264:193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2003.12.054.Search in Google Scholar

6. Chen, S, Zhao, ZJ, Mu, R, Chang, X, Luo, J, Purdy, SC, et al.. Propane dehydrogenation on single-site [PtZn4] intermetallic catalysts. Chem 2021;7:387–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHEMPR.2020.10.008.Search in Google Scholar

7. Srisakwattana, T, Watmanee, S, Wannakao, S, Saiyasombat, C, Praserthdam, P, Panpranot, J. Comparative incorporation of Sn and in in Mg(Al)O for the enhanced stability of Pt/MgAl(X)O catalysts in propane dehydrogenation. Appl Catal Gen 2021;615:118053. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APCATA.2021.118053.Search in Google Scholar

8. Wang, Y, Suo, Y, Lv, X, Wang, Z, Yuan, ZY. Enhanced performances of bimetallic Ga-Pt nanoclusters confined within silicalite-1 zeolite in propane dehydrogenation. J Colloid Interface Sci 2021;593:304–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCIS.2021.02.129.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Oyegoke, T, Dabai, N, Uzairu, A, Jibril, EY. Density functional theory calculation of propane cracking mechanism over chromium (III) oxide by cluster approach. J Serb Chem Soc 2021;86:44. https://doi.org/10.2298/jsc200521044o.Search in Google Scholar

10. Oyegoke, T, Dabai, FN, Uzairu, A, Jibril, BE-Y. Mechanistic insight into propane dehydrogenation into propylene over chromium (III) oxide by cluster approach and density functional theory calculations. Eur J Chem 2020;11:342–50. https://doi.org/10.5155/eurjchem.11.4.342-350.2045.Search in Google Scholar

11. Oyegoke, T, Dabai, FN, Waziri, SM, Uzairu, A. Jibril, BY. Impact of Mo and W on CrXO3 (X = Cr, Mo, W) catalytic performance in a propane non-oxidative dehydrogenation process. Kemija u Industriji 2022;71:583–90. https://doi.org/10.15255/KUI.2022.006.Search in Google Scholar

12. Hu, ZP, Wang, Y, Yang, D, Yuan, ZY. CrOx supported on high-silica HZSM-5 for propane dehydrogenation. J Energy Chem 2020;47:225–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JECHEM.2019.12.010.Search in Google Scholar

13. Golubina, Ev, Kaplin, IY, Gorodnova, Av, Lokteva, ES, Isaikina, OY, Maslakov, KI. Non-oxidative propane dehydrogenation on CrOx-ZrO2-SiO2 catalyst prepared by one-pot template-assisted method. Molecules 2022;27:6095. https://doi.org/10.3390/MOLECULES27186095.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Haydary, J. Chemical process design and simulation. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2018.10.1002/9781119311478Search in Google Scholar

15. Haydary, J. Reactors. In: Chemical process design and simulation. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2019:101–24 pp.Search in Google Scholar

16. Xiang, H, Zhang, H, Liu, P, Yan, Y. Preparation of high purity propane from liquefied petroleum gas in a fixed bed by removal of sulfur and butanes. Chem Eng J 2016;284:224–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2015.08.160.Search in Google Scholar

17. Ahmed, MJ, Theydan, SK. Modeling of propane separation from light hydrocarbons by adsorption on 4A molecular sieve zeolite. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 2014;18:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNGSE.2014.01.012.Search in Google Scholar

18. Agarwal, A, Sengupta, D, El-Halwagi, M. Sustainable process design approach for on-purpose propylene production and intensification. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 2018;6:2407–21. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSSUSCHEMENG.7B03854/ASSET/IMAGES/MEDIUM/SC-2017-03854S_0010.GIF.Search in Google Scholar

19. Walker, K. Techno-economic feasibility of propane dehydrogenation in novel membrane reactors. Eindhoven, Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology; 2020.Search in Google Scholar

20. Kenneth, DK, Gonurubon, J, Michael, AO, Douglas, NH. Simulation of a process unit for the recovery of light ends from natural gas mixture. Bioprocess Eng 2022;6:33. https://doi.org/10.11648/J.BE.20220602.14.Search in Google Scholar

21. Oyegoke, T, Dabai, FN, Uzairu, A, Jibril, BEY. Mechanistic insight into propane dehydrogenation into propylene over chromium (III) oxide by cluster approach and density functional theory calculations. Eur J Chem 2020;11:342–50. https://doi.org/10.5155/eurjchem.11.4.342-350.2045.Search in Google Scholar

22. Liu, J, Liu, Y, Ni, Y, Liu, H, Zhu, W, Liu, Z. Enhanced propane dehydrogenation to propylene over zinc-promoted chromium catalysts. Catal Sci Technol 2020;10:1739–46. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cy01921a.Search in Google Scholar

23. Forero, GLA, Velásquez, JJA. A generalized cubic equation of state for non-polar and polar substances. Fluid Phase Equil 2016;418:74–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FLUID.2015.09.045.Search in Google Scholar

24. Xu, BJ, Zheng, B, Hua, WM, Yue, YH, Gao, Z. High Si/Al ratio HZSM-5 supported Ga2O3: a highly stable catalyst for dehydrogenation of propane to propene in the presence of CO2. Stud Surf Sci Catal 2007;170:1072–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991(07)80962-1.Search in Google Scholar

25. Docherty, SR, Rochlitz, L, Payard, PA, Copéret, C. Heterogeneous alkane dehydrogenation catalysts investigated via a surface organometallic chemistry approach. Chem Soc Rev 2021;50:5806–22. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cs01424a.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Raman, N, Maisel, S, Grabau, M, Taccardi, N, Debuschewitz, J, Wolf, M, et al.. Highly effective propane dehydrogenation using Ga-Rh supported catalytically active liquid metal solutions. ACS Catal 2019;9:9499–507. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b02459.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Chen, S, Chang, X, Sun, G, Zhang, T, Xu, Y, Wang, Y, et al.. Propane dehydrogenation: catalyst development, new chemistry, and emerging technologies. Chem Soc Rev 2021;50:3315–54. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cs00814a.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Maddah, HA. A comparative study between propane dehydrogenation (PDH) technologies and plants in Saudi Arabia. Am Acad Sci Res J Eng, Technol Sci 2018;45:49–63.Search in Google Scholar

29. Cameron, AC, Windmeijer, FAG. An R-squared measure of goodness of fit for some common nonlinear regression models. J Econom 1997;77:329–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(96)01818-0.Search in Google Scholar

30. Chicco, D, Warrens, MJ, Jurman, G. The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. PeerJ Comput Sci 2021;7:1–24. https://doi.org/10.7717/PEERJ-CS.623/SUPP-1.Search in Google Scholar

31. Méndez-Mateos, D, Barrio, VL, Requies, JM, Cambra, JF. A study of deactivation by H2S and regeneration of a Ni catalyst supported on Al2O3, during methanation of CO2. Effect of the promoters Co, Cr, Fe and Mo. RSC Adv 2020;10:16551–64. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA00882F.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. Lamy-Pitara, E, Bencharif, L, Barbier, J. Effect of sulphur on the properties of platinum catalysts as characterized by cyclic voltammetry. Appl Catal 1985;18:117–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-9834(00)80303-6.Search in Google Scholar

33. Gao, XQ, Li, WC, Qiu, B, Sheng, J, Wu, F, Lu, AH. Promotion effect of sulfur impurity in alumina support on propane dehydrogenation. J Energy Chem 2022;70:332–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JECHEM.2022.02.048.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-10-31
Accepted: 2023-01-13
Published Online: 2023-02-22

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Topology and applications of 2D Dirac and semi-Dirac materials
  4. Landscape ecological modeling to identify ecologically significant regions in Tumkur district, Karnataka
  5. Surfactants-surface active agents behind sustainable living
  6. Ecological footprint of poultry production and effect of environment on poultry genes
  7. Fluoride in water, health implications and plant-based remediation strategies
  8. Poultry nutrition
  9. Synthesis of N-containing heterocycles in water
  10. Inorganic nanoparticles promoted synthesis of heterocycles
  11. The role of analytical chemistry in poultry science
  12. Antibiotics in avian care and husbandry-status and alternative antimicrobials
  13. Removal of heavy metals from wastewater using synthetic chelating agents
  14. Azadirachtin in the aquatic environment: Fate and effects on non-target fauna
  15. Intensification of bioprocesses with filamentous microorganisms
  16. The science of genetically modified poultry
  17. Emerging in ovo technologies in poultry production and the re-discovered chicken model in preclinical research
  18. The Cambridge structural database (CSD): important resources for teaching concepts in structural chemistry and intermolecular interactions
  19. Microbial production of lactic acid using organic wastes as low-cost substrates
  20. Oxalic acid: recent developments for cost-effective microbial production
  21. Immobilization of α-amylase from Aspergillus fumigatus using adsorption method onto zeolite
  22. A comparative assessment of potentially harmful metals in the Lagos Lagoon and Ogun river catchment
  23. Formulation of a herbal topical cream against Tinea capitis using flavonoids glycosides from Dicerocaryum senecioides and Diospyros mespiliformis
  24. Biodegradable polymers – research and applications
  25. Adsorption of trichloroacetic acid from drinking water using polyethylene terephthalate waste carbon and periwinkle shells–based chitosan
  26. The vital use of isocyanide-based multicomponent reactions (MCR) in chemical synthesis
  27. Pine bark crosslinked to cyclodextrin for the adsorption of 2-nitrophenol from an aqueous solution
  28. Computational study of propene selectivity and yield in the dehydrogenation of propane via process simulation approach
  29. A mini review on the prospects of Fagara zanthoxyloides extract based composites: a remedy for COVID-19 and associated replica?
  30. Physicochemical assessment and insilico studies on the interaction of 5-HT2c receptor with herbal medication bioactive compounds used in the treatment of premature ejaculation
  31. Horse chestnut thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  32. Rice thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
Downloaded on 25.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psr-2022-0242/html
Scroll to top button