Home Physical Sciences Emerging in ovo technologies in poultry production and the re-discovered chicken model in preclinical research
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Emerging in ovo technologies in poultry production and the re-discovered chicken model in preclinical research

  • Akhavan Niloofar , Bednarczyk Marek , Krajewski Krzysztof and Stadnicka Katarzyna EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 3, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Prenatal programming is a concept based on assumptions that the events occurring in critical points of embryonic development may pose epigenetic changes resulting from chemical rearrangements on the DNA structure. Epigenetic changes may pose life lasting phenotypic effects in the animal, or can be heritable, like gene silencing associated with methylation in gene promoters regions. The technical advancements in biotechnology, bioinformatics, molecular techniques and robotization have brought to new technological applications in poultry production. Intentional stimulation of embryonic development and determination of the future health of the hatched organism is possible by in ovo application of natural antioxidants and prebiotics, gut stabilizers like probiotics and other immunological enhancements, including vaccines. In parallel, the fine-tuned and generally accessible techniques of chicken embryo incubation along with the novel tissue engineering tools have led to focus the attention of scientists on chicken embryo as the alternative animal model for some pre-clinical approaches, in the context of reducing and replacing the experiments on animals. In this chapter, some key highlights are provided on current achievements in poultry embryonic applications, with the attention put to the emerging in ovo technologies (in ovo feeding, immunological stimulation and in ovo oncological tools), that address the societal challenges in food production and health management.


Corresponding author: Stadnicka Katarzyna, Oncology Department, Collegium Medicum of Ludwik Rydygier in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland, E-mail:
The scientific input is financed by: 1/ National Science Centre Poland grant no. 2019/35/B/NZ9/03186 (OVOBIOM), 2/ Inkubator Innowacyjności 4.0, Ministry of Education and Science Poland.

Funding source: Narodowe Centrum Nauki

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2019/35/B/NZ9/03186

Award Identifier / Grant number: Inkubator Innowacyjności 4.0

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This work was funded by Narodowe Centrum Nauki (2019/35/B/NZ9/03186) and Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki (Inkubator Innowacyjności 4.0).

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2022–2031. Chapter 1: agricultural and food markets: trends and prospects; 2022. Available from: https://www.fao.org/publications/oecd-fao-agricultural-outlook/2022-2031/en/.Search in Google Scholar

2. Sharma, JM, Burmester, BR. Resistance to Marek’s disease at hatching in chickens vaccinated as embryos with the Turkey herpesvirus. Avian Dis 1982;26:134–49.10.2307/1590032Search in Google Scholar

3. Ding, J, Dai, R, Yang, L, He, C, Xu, K, Liu, S, et al.. Inheritance and establishment of gut microbiota in chickens. Front Microbiol 2017;8:1967. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01967.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Fioranelli, M, Sepehri, A, Roccia, MG, Rossi, C, Vojvodic, P, Lotti, J, et al.. In ovo sexing of chicken eggs by virus spectroscopy. Open Access Macedonian J Med Sci 2019;7:3106–9. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.768.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Galli, R, Preusse, G, Uckermann, O, Bartels, T, Krautwald-Junhanns, M-E, Koch, E, et al.. In ovo sexing of domestic chicken eggs by Raman spectroscopy. Anal Chem 2016;88:8657–63. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01868.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. eggXYt project H2020. A novel approach for sexing chicken embryos on day one before incubation – saving them from being hatched and disposed of. Eur Comm CORDIS 2022. https://doi.org/10.3030/873460.Search in Google Scholar

7. Mankad, A, Hobman, EV, Carter, L, Tizard, M. Ethical eggs: can synthetic biology disrupt the global egg production industry? Front Sustain Food Syst 2022;6:915454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.915454.Search in Google Scholar

8. Augère-Granier, MA. The EU poultry meat and egg sector. Main features, challenges and prospects. European Parliamentary Research Service, PE 644.195; 2019. Available from: file:///C:/Users/kates/Downloads/EPRS_IDA(2019)644195_EN.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

9. Zumbrink, L, Brenig, B, Foerster, Z, Hurlin, J, Wenzlawowicz, M. Electrical anaesthesia of male chicken embryos in the second third of the incubation period in compliance with animal welfare. Eur Poult Sci 2020;84:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1399/eps.2020.315.Search in Google Scholar

10. Bednarczyk, M, Dunislawska, A, Stadnicka, K, Grochowska, E. Chicken embryo as a model in epigenetic research. Poultry Sci 2021;100:101164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101164.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Sokale, AO, Williams, CJ, Hoerr, FJ, Collins, KEC, Peebles, ED. Effects of administration of an in ovo coccidiosis vaccine at different embryonic ages on vaccine cycling and performance of broiler chickens. Poultry Sci 2021;100:100914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.11.078.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Regulation (EU) 2019/4 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the manufacture, placing on the market and use of medicated feed, amending Regulation (EC) No 183/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 90/167/EEC.Search in Google Scholar

13. Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on veterinary medicinal products and repealing Directive 2001/82/EC (Text with EEA relevance).Search in Google Scholar

14. WHO Surveillance- Avian influenza. Weekly Update Number 878, 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/westernpacific/emergencies/surveillance/avian-influenza.Search in Google Scholar

15. Guo, Y, Ding, P, Li, Y, Zhang, Y, Zheng, Y, Yu, M, et al.. Genetic and biological properties of H10N3 avian influenza viruses: a potential pandemic candidate? Transbound Emerg Dis 2022;69:e3171–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14458.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Sjaak de Wit, JJ, Montiel, E. Practical aspects of poultry vaccination. Chapter 18 in Avian Immunology, 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA, USA: Academic Press; 2022:469–88 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-818708-1.00012-9Search in Google Scholar

17. Wakenell, PS, Brian, T, Schaeffer, S, Avakian, A, Williams, C, Whitfill, C. Effect of in-ovo vaccine delivery route on herpes virus of Turkey/SB-1 efficacy and viraemia. Avian Dis 2002;46:274–80.10.1637/0005-2086(2002)046[0274:EOIOVD]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

18. Uni, Z, Ferket, PR, Tako, E, Kedar, O. In ovo feeding improves energy status of late-term chicken embryos. Poultry Sci 2005;84:764–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.5.764.Search in Google Scholar

19. Saeed, M, Babazadeh, D, Naveed, M, Alagawany, M, Abd El-Hack, ME, Arain, MA, et al.. In ovo delivery of various biological supplements, vaccines and drugs in poultry: current knowledge. J Sci Food Agric 2019;99:3727–39.10.1002/jsfa.9593Search in Google Scholar

20. Gunawardana, T, Ahmed, KA, Goonewardene, K, Popowich, S, Kurukulasuriya, S, Karunarathna, R, et al.. Synthetic CpG-ODN rapidly enriches immune compartments in neonatal chicks to induce protective immunity against bacterial infections. Sci Rep 2019;9:341. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36588-6.Search in Google Scholar

21. Peroni, DG, Morelli, L. Probiotics as adjuvants in vaccine strategy: is there more room for improvement? Vaccines (Basel) 2021;9:811. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9080811.Search in Google Scholar

22. Wagenberg, CPA, van Horne, PLM, van Asseldonk, MAPM. Cost-effectiveness analysis of using probiotics, prebiotics, or synbiotics to control campylobacter in broilers. Poultry Sci 2020;99:4077–84.10.1016/j.psj.2020.05.003Search in Google Scholar

23. McCartney, E. Focus on European feed additives: complexity, change and challenges ahead. Regul Rapp 2018;15. https://pentec-consulting.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Focus-on-European-feed-additives.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

24. Pruszynska-Oszmalek, E, Kolodziejski, PA, Stadnicka, K, Sassek, M, Chalupka, D, Kuston, B, et al.. In ovo injection of prebiotics and synbiotics affects the digestive potency of the pancreas in growing chickens. Poultry Sci 2018;9:1909–16.10.3382/ps/pev162Search in Google Scholar

25. Stefaniak, T, Madej, JP, Graczyk, S, Siwek, M, Łukaszewicz, E, Kowalczyk, A, et al.. Impact of prebiotics and synbiotics administered in ovo on the immune response against experimental antigens in chicken broilers. Animals (Basel) 2020;10:643. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040643.Search in Google Scholar

26. Tavaniello, S, Maiorano, G, Stadnicka, K, Mucci, R, Bogucka, J, Bednarczyk, M. Prebiotics offered to broiler chicken exert positive effect on meat quality traits irrespective of delivery route. Poultry Sci 2018;97:2979–87. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey149.Search in Google Scholar

27. Bogucka, J, Dankowiakowska, A, Stanek, M, Stadnicka, K, Kirkiłło-Stacewicz, K. Effect of synbiotics administered in ovo on microvascularization and histopathological changes in pectoral muscle and the biochemical profile of broiler chicken blood. Poultry Sci 2022;101:101628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101628.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Villaluenga, CM, Wardeńska, M, Pilarski, R, Bednarczyk, M, Gulewicz, K. Utilization of the chicken embryo model for assessment of biological activity of different oligosaccharides. Folia Biol (Krakow) 2004;52:135–42. https://doi.org/10.3409/1734916044527502.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Ding, P, Liu, H, Tong, Y, He, X, Yin, X, Yin, Y, et al.. Developmental change of yolk microbiota and its role on early colonization of intestinal microbiota in chicken embryo. Animals 2022;12:16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010016.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Ghimire, S, Zhang, X, Zhang, J, Wu, C. Use of chicken embryo model in toxicity studies of endocrine-disrupting chemicals and nanoparticles. Chem Res Toxicol 2022;35:550–68. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.1c00399.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Burt, DW. The chicken genome. Genome Dyn 2006;2:123–37. https://doi.org/10.1159/000095100.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Fang, G, Bhardwaj, N, Robilotto, R, Gerstein, MB. Getting started in gene orthology and functional analysis. PLoS Comput Biol 2010;6:e1000703. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000703.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Beacon, TH, Davie, JR. The chicken model organism for epigenomic research. Genome 2021;64:476–89. https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2020-0129.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Ribeiro, LNM, Schlemper, AE, Da Silva, MV, Fonseca, BB. Chicken embryo: a useful animal model for drug testing? Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2022;26:4828–39.Search in Google Scholar

35. Chen, L, Wang, S, Feng, Y, Zhang, J, Du, Y, Zhang, J, et al.. Utilisation of chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane as a model platform for imaging-navigated biomedical research. Cells 2021;10:463. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10020463.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Dagg, CP, Karnofsky, DA, Roddy, J. Growth of transplantable human tumors in the chick embryo and hatched chick. Cancer Res 1956;16:589–94.Search in Google Scholar

37. Sokolenko, EA, Berchner-Pfannschmidt, U, Ting, SC, Schmid, KW, Bechrakis, NE, Seitz, B, et al.. Optimisation of the chicken chorioallantoic membrane assay in uveal melanoma research. Pharmaceutics 2022;14:13. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14010013.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

38. Vu, BT, Shahin, SA, Croissant, J, Fatieiev, Y, Matsumoto, K, Le-Hoang Doa, T, et al.. Chick chorioallantoic membrane assay as an in vivo model to study the effect of nanoparticle-based anticancer drugs in ovarian cancer. Sci Rep 2018;8:8524.10.1038/s41598-018-25573-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

39. Komatsu, A, Matsumoto, K, Saito, T, Muto, M, Tamanoi, F. Patient derived chicken egg tumor model (PDcE model): current status and critical issues. Cells 2019;8:440. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8050440.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

40. Harper, K, Yatsyna, A, Charbonneau, M, Brochu-Gaudreau, K, Perreault, A, Jeldres, C, et al.. The chicken chorioallantoic membrane tumor assay as a relevant in vivo model to study the impact of hypoxia on tumor progression and metastasis. Cancers 2021;13:1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13051093.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

41. Vishnoi, V, Liebenberg, P, Reid, F, Ward, A, Draganic, B. A primary germ cell tumour in the gastrointestinal tract: a caecal lesion of yolk-sac morphology in a young patient. J Surg Case Rep 2018;11:291. https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjy291.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

42. Oing, C, Skowron, MA, Bokemeyer, C, Nettersheim, D. Epigenetic treatment combinations to effectively target cisplatin-resistant germ cell tumors: past, present, and future considerations. Andrology 2019;7:487–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12611.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Barbet, V, Broutier, L. Future match making: when pediatric oncology meets organoid technology. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021;9:674219. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.674219.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

44. Roelen, BAJ, Chuva de Sousa Lopes, SM. Stay on the road: from germ cell specification to gonadal colonization in mammals. Philos Trans R Soc B 2022;377:20210259. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0259.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

45. Saito, D, Tadokoro, R, Nagasaka, A, Yoshino, D, Teramoto, T, Mizumoto, K, et al.. Stiffness of primordial germ cells is required for their extravasation in avian embryos. iSciene 2022;25:105629.10.1016/j.isci.2022.105629Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

46. Rengaraj, D, Han, JY. Female germ cell development in chickens and humans: the chicken oocyte enriched genes convergent and divergent with the human oocyte. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23:11412. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911412.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

47. Kazim, S, Cemal, O, Mehmet, T, Nurhan, S, Hakkı, T, İbrahim, HÖ, et al.. Chemopreventive and antitumor efficacy of curcumin in a spontaneously developing hen ovarian cancer model. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2018;11:59–67. https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.Search in Google Scholar

48. Sahin, K, Yenice, E, Tuzcu, M, Orhan, C, Mizrak, C, Ozercan, IH, et al.. Lycopene protects against spontaneous ovarian cancer formation in laying hens. J Cancer Prev 2018;23:25–36. https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2018.23.1.25.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

49. Choi, PW, Bahrampour, A, Ng, SK, Liu, SK, Qiu, W, Xie, F, et al.. Characterization of miR-200 family members as blood biomarkers for human and laying hen ovarian cancer. Sci Rep 2020;10:20071. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77068-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2022-12-16
Accepted: 2022-12-20
Published Online: 2023-02-03

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Topology and applications of 2D Dirac and semi-Dirac materials
  4. Landscape ecological modeling to identify ecologically significant regions in Tumkur district, Karnataka
  5. Surfactants-surface active agents behind sustainable living
  6. Ecological footprint of poultry production and effect of environment on poultry genes
  7. Fluoride in water, health implications and plant-based remediation strategies
  8. Poultry nutrition
  9. Synthesis of N-containing heterocycles in water
  10. Inorganic nanoparticles promoted synthesis of heterocycles
  11. The role of analytical chemistry in poultry science
  12. Antibiotics in avian care and husbandry-status and alternative antimicrobials
  13. Removal of heavy metals from wastewater using synthetic chelating agents
  14. Azadirachtin in the aquatic environment: Fate and effects on non-target fauna
  15. Intensification of bioprocesses with filamentous microorganisms
  16. The science of genetically modified poultry
  17. Emerging in ovo technologies in poultry production and the re-discovered chicken model in preclinical research
  18. The Cambridge structural database (CSD): important resources for teaching concepts in structural chemistry and intermolecular interactions
  19. Microbial production of lactic acid using organic wastes as low-cost substrates
  20. Oxalic acid: recent developments for cost-effective microbial production
  21. Immobilization of α-amylase from Aspergillus fumigatus using adsorption method onto zeolite
  22. A comparative assessment of potentially harmful metals in the Lagos Lagoon and Ogun river catchment
  23. Formulation of a herbal topical cream against Tinea capitis using flavonoids glycosides from Dicerocaryum senecioides and Diospyros mespiliformis
  24. Biodegradable polymers – research and applications
  25. Adsorption of trichloroacetic acid from drinking water using polyethylene terephthalate waste carbon and periwinkle shells–based chitosan
  26. The vital use of isocyanide-based multicomponent reactions (MCR) in chemical synthesis
  27. Pine bark crosslinked to cyclodextrin for the adsorption of 2-nitrophenol from an aqueous solution
  28. Computational study of propene selectivity and yield in the dehydrogenation of propane via process simulation approach
  29. A mini review on the prospects of Fagara zanthoxyloides extract based composites: a remedy for COVID-19 and associated replica?
  30. Physicochemical assessment and insilico studies on the interaction of 5-HT2c receptor with herbal medication bioactive compounds used in the treatment of premature ejaculation
  31. Horse chestnut thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  32. Rice thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
Downloaded on 25.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psr-2021-0130/pdf
Scroll to top button