Home Development in nanomembrane-based filtration of emerging contaminants
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Development in nanomembrane-based filtration of emerging contaminants

  • Amare Tiruneh Adugna EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 13, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Submit Manuscript Author Information
Physical Sciences Reviews
From the journal Physical Sciences Reviews Volume 8 Issue 8

Abstract

Recently, the concentration of emerging contaminants is increasing in drinking water sources, industrial wastewater, and reclaimed water. It is not possible to remove the emerging contaminants using conventional methods, and the interest to use nanomembrane-based filtration is getting attention. A nanomembrane-based filtration can be manipulated without the use of any special equipment. Different research findings reported better removal of emerging contaminants has been achieved using nanomembrane-based filtration. Moreover, new developments have been examined and implemented at different levels and are expected to continue. Therefore, this chapter provides a brief overview of recent developments on nanomembrane-based filtration processes in the removal of emerging contaminants from drinking water sources, industrial wastewater, and reclaimed water.

Keywords: drinking water; emerging contaminants; filtration; nanomembrane; reclaimed water
Corresponding author: Amare Tiruneh Adugna, Department of Environmental Engineering, Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, College of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Saleem, H, Trabzon, L, Kilic, A, Zaidi, SJ. Recent advances in nanofibrous membranes: production and applications in water treatment and desalination. Desalination 2020;478:114178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.114178.Search in Google Scholar

2. Warsinger, DM, Chakraborty, S, Tow, EW, Plumlee, MH, Bellona, C, Loutatidou, S, et al.. A review of polymeric membranes and processes for potable water reuse. Prog Polym Sci 2018;81:209–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.01.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Garcia-Ivars, J, Martella, L, Massella, M, Carbonell-Alcaina, C, Alcaina-Miranda, MI, Iborra-Clar, MI. Nanofiltration as tertiary treatment method for removing trace pharmaceutically active compounds in wastewater from wastewater treatment plants. Water Res 2017;125:360–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.08.070.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Wang, S, Li, L, Yu, S, Dong, B, Gao, N, Wang, X. A review of advances in EDCs and PhACs removal by nanofiltration: mechanisms, impact factors and the influence of organic matter. Chem Eng J 2020:126722.10.1016/j.cej.2020.126722Search in Google Scholar

5. Abdel-Fatah, MA. Nanofiltration systems and applications in wastewater treatment. AIN Shams Eng J 2018;9:3077–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2018.08.001.Search in Google Scholar

6. Zirehpour, A, Rahimpour, A. Membranes for wastewater treatment. Nanostructured polymer membranes. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2016, vol. 2:159–207 pp.10.1002/9781118831823.ch4Search in Google Scholar

7. Goswami, KP, Pugazhenthi, G. Credibility of polymeric and ceramic membrane filtration in the removal of bacteria and virus from water: a review. J Environ Manag 2020;268:110583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110583.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Sharma, BB, Parashar, A. Mechanical strength of a nanoporous bicrystalline h-BN nanomembrane in a water submerged state. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2020;22:20453–65. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cp03235b.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Ray, SS, Chen, SS, Li, CW, Nguyen, NC, Nguyen, HT. A comprehensive review: electrospinning technique for fabrication and surface modification of membranes for water treatment application. RSC Adv 2016;6:85495–514. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra14952a.Search in Google Scholar

10. Xu, P, Drewes, JE, Kim, TU, Bellona, C, Amy, G. Effect of membrane fouling on transport of organic contaminants in NF/RO membrane applications. J Membr Sci 2006;279:165–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.001.Search in Google Scholar

11. Tanninen, J, Platt, S, Weis, A, Nyström, M. Long-term acid resistance and selectivity of NF membranes in very acidic conditions. J Membr Sci 2004;240:11–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.04.006.Search in Google Scholar

12. Yoon, SH, Lee, CH, Kim, KJ, Fane, AG. Effect of calcium ion on the fouling of nanofilter by humic acid in drinking water production. Water Res 1998;32:2180–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0043-1354(97)00416-8.Search in Google Scholar

13. Tang, CY, Kwon, YN, Leckie, JO. Effect of membrane chemistry and coating layer on physiochemical properties of thin film composite polyamide RO and NF membranes: II. Membrane physiochemical properties and their dependence on polyamide and coating layers. Desalination 2009;242:168–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.04.004.Search in Google Scholar

14. Weinman, ST. Development of anti-fouling membranes for water treatment. (Doctoral dissertation) Clemson University; 2018.Search in Google Scholar

15. Foureaux, AF, Reis, EO, Lebron, Y, Moreira, V, Santos, LV, Amaral, MS, et al.. Rejection of pharmaceutical compounds from surface water by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. Separ Purif Technol 2019;212:171–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.11.018.Search in Google Scholar

16. Kumar, A, Gupta, RK. Fundamentals of polymer engineering. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2018.10.1201/9780429398506Search in Google Scholar

17. Jhaveri, JH, Murthy, ZV. Nanocomposite membranes. Desalination Water Treat 2016;57:26803–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1120687.Search in Google Scholar

18. Esfahani, MR, Aktij, SA, Dabaghian, Z, Firouzjaei, MD, Rahimpour, A, Eke, J, et al.. Nanocomposite membranes for water separation and purification: fabrication, modification, and applications. Separ Purif Technol 2019;213:465–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.12.050.Search in Google Scholar

19. Rehman, F, Thebo, KH, Aamir, M, Akhtar, J. Nanomembranes for water treatment. In: Nanotechnology in the beverage industry. Cham: Elsevier; 2020:207–40 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-819941-1.00008-0Search in Google Scholar

20. Richardson, JJ, Cui, J, Bjornmalm, M, Braunger, JA, Ejima, H, Caruso, F. Innovation in layer-by-layer assembly. Chem Rev 2016;116:14828–67. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00627.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Richardson, JJ, Björnmalm, M, Caruso, F. Technology-driven layer-by-layer assembly of nanofilms. Science 2015;348. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa2491.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Xu, YC, Tang, YP, Liu, LF, Guo, ZH, Shao, L. Nanocomposite organic solvent nanofiltration membranes by a highly-efficient mussel-inspired co-deposition strategy. J Membr Sci 2017;526:32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.026.Search in Google Scholar

23. Xu, Y, Guo, D, Li, T, Xiao, Y, Shen, L, Li, R, et al.. Manipulating the mussel-inspired co-deposition of tannic acid and amine for fabrication of nanofiltration membranes with an enhanced separation performance. J Colloid Interface Sci 2020;565:23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2020.01.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Tan, X, Rodrigue, D. A review on porous polymeric membrane preparation. Part II: production techniques with polyethylene, polydimethylsiloxane, polypropylene, polyimide, and polytetrafluoroethylene. Polymers 2019;11:1310. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081310.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Wang, F, Ratke, L, Zhang, H, Altschuh, P, Nestler, B. A phase-field study on polymerization-induced phase separation occasioned by diffusion and capillary flow—a mechanism for the formation of porous microstructures in membranes. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 2020;94:356–74.10.1007/s10971-020-05238-7Search in Google Scholar

26. Kang, Z, Guo, H, Fan, L, Yang, G, Feng, Y, Sun, D, et al.. Scalable crystalline porous membranes: current state and perspectives. Chem Soc Rev 2021;50:1913–44. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cs00786b.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Wu, C, Liu, S, Wang, Z, Zhang, J, Wang, X, Lu, X, et al.. Nanofiltration membranes with dually charged composite layer exhibiting super-high multivalent-salt rejection. J Membr Sci 2016;517:64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.05.033.Search in Google Scholar

28. Sun, CC, Zhou, MY, Yuan, JJ, Yan, Y, Song, YZ, Fang, LF, et al.. Membranes with negatively-charged nanochannels fabricated from aqueous sulfonated polysulfone nanoparticles for enhancing the rejection of divalent anions. J Membr Sci 2020;602:117692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117692.Search in Google Scholar

29. Bassyouni, M, Abdel-Aziz, MH, Zoromba, MS, Abdel-Hamid, SM, Drioli, E. A review of polymeric nanocomposite membranes for water purification. J Ind Eng Chem 2019;73:19–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2019.01.045.Search in Google Scholar

30. Feng, S, Zhong, Z, Wang, Y, Xing, W, Drioli, E. Progress and perspectives in PTFE membrane: preparation, modification, and applications. J Membr Sci 2018;549:332–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.12.032.Search in Google Scholar

31. Bavatharani, C, Muthusankar, E, Wabaidur, SM, Alothman, ZA, Alsheetan, KM, Mana Al-Anazy, M, et al.. Electrospinning technique for production of polyaniline nanocomposites/nanofibres for multi-functional applications: a review. Synth Met 2020:116609.10.1016/j.synthmet.2020.116609Search in Google Scholar

32. Liu, F, Ma, BR, Zhou, D, Zhu, LJ, Fu, YY, Xue, LX. Positively charged loose nanofiltration membrane grafted by diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride (DADMAC) via UV for salt and dye removal. React Funct Polym 2015;86:191–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.09.003.Search in Google Scholar

33. Al Aani, S, Haroutounian, A, Wright, CJ, Hilal, N. Thin film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes modified with polydopamine coated metals/carbon-nanostructures for desalination applications. Desalination 2018;427:60–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.10.011.Search in Google Scholar

34. Gohil, JM, Choudhury, RR. Introduction to nanostructured and nano-enhanced polymeric membranes: preparation, function, and application for water purification. In: Nanoscale materials in water purification. New York: Elsevier; 2019:25–57 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-813926-4.00038-0Search in Google Scholar

35. Prince, JA, Bhuvana, S, Boodhoo, KV, Anbharasi, V, Singh, G. Synthesis and characterization of PEG-Ag immobilized PES hollow fiber ultrafiltration membranes with long lasting antifouling properties. J Membr Sci 2014;454:538–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.050.Search in Google Scholar

36. Fathizadeh, M, Aroujalian, A, Raisi, A. Effect of added NaX nano-zeolite into polyamide as a top thin layer of membrane on water flux and salt rejection in a reverse osmosis process. J Membr Sci 2011;375:88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.017.Search in Google Scholar

37. Balta, S, Sotto, A, Luis, P, Benea, L, Van der Bruggen, B, Kim, J. A new outlook on membrane enhancement with nanoparticles: the alternative of ZnO. J Membr Sci 2012;389:155–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.10.025.Search in Google Scholar

38. Shi, F, Ma, Y, Ma, J, Wang, P, Sun, W. Preparation and characterization of PVDF/TiO2 hybrid membranes with ionic liquid modified nano-TiO2 particles. J Membr Sci 2013;427:259–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.10.007.Search in Google Scholar

39. Maximous, N, Nakhla, G, Wan, W, Wong, K. Performance of a novel ZrO2/PES membrane for wastewater filtration. J Membr Sci 2010;352:222–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.02.021.Search in Google Scholar

40. Xia, S, Ni, M. Preparation of poly (vinylidene fluoride) membranes with graphene oxide addition for natural organic matter removal. J Membr Sci 2015;473:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.09.018.Search in Google Scholar

41. Otitoju, TA, Ahmadipour, M, Li, S, Shoparwe, NF, Jie, LX, Owolabi, AL. Influence of nanoparticle type on the performance of nanocomposite membranes for wastewater treatment. J Water Process Eng 2020;36:101356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101356.Search in Google Scholar

42. Shen, JN, Yu, CC, Zeng, GN, Van der Bruggen, B. Preparation of a facilitated transport membrane composed of carboxymethyl chitosan and polyethylenimine for CO2/N2 separation. Int J Mol Sci 2013;14:3621–38. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14023621.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

43. Yu, S, Zuo, X, Bao, R, Xu, X, Wang, J, Xu, J. Effect of SiO2 nanoparticle addition on the characteristics of a new organic–inorganic hybrid membrane. Polymer 2009;50:553–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2008.11.012.Search in Google Scholar

44. Alam, J, Dass, LA, Ghasemi, M, Alhoshan, M. Synthesis and optimization of PES‐Fe3O4 mixed matrix nanocomposite membrane: application studies in water purification. Polym Compos 2013;34:1870–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.22593.Search in Google Scholar

45. Lazar, M, Chaumont, D, Lacroute, Y, Chassagnon, R, Ciobanu, I, Sacilotti, M. Growth of three-dimensional TiO2 nanomembranes. Sci Adv Mater 2011;3:102–6. https://doi.org/10.1166/sam.2011.1140.Search in Google Scholar

46. Khan, SB, Ali, F, Kamal, T, Anwar, Y, Asiri, AM, Seo, J. CuO embedded chitosan spheres as antibacterial adsorbent for dyes. Int J Biol Macromol 2016;88:113–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.03.026.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

47. Mierzwa, JC, Arieta, V, Verlage, M, Carvalho, J, Vecitis, CD. Effect of clay nanoparticles on the structure and performance of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination 2013;314:147–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.01.011.Search in Google Scholar

48. Alkhouzaam, A, Qiblawey, H. Functional GO-based membranes for water treatment and desalination: fabrication methods, performance and advantages. A review. Chemosphere 2021;274:129853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129853.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

49. Liu, F, Wang, L, Li, D, Liu, Q, Deng, B. A review: the effect of the microporous support during interfacial polymerization on the morphology and performances of a thin film composite membrane for liquid purification. RSC Adv 2019;9:35417–28. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra07114h.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

50. Zheng, PY, Ye, CC, Wang, XS, Chen, KF, An, QF, Lee, KR, et al.. Poly (sodium vinylsulfonate)/chitosan membranes with sulfonate ionic cross-linking and free sulfate groups: preparation and application in alcohol dehydration. J Membr Sci 2016;510:220–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.02.060.Search in Google Scholar

51. Ye, CC, Zhao, FY, Wu, JK, Weng, XD, Zheng, PY, Mi, YF, et al.. Sulfated polyelectrolyte complex nanoparticles structured nanoflitration membrane for dye desalination. Chem Eng J 2017;307:526–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.122.Search in Google Scholar

52. Fang, LF, Zhou, MY, Cheng, L, Zhu, BK, Matsuyama, H, Zhao, S. Positively charged nanofiltration membrane based on cross-linked polyvinyl chloride copolymer. J Membr Sci 2019;572:28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.054.Search in Google Scholar

53. Hussain, AA, Nataraj, SK, Abashar, ME, Al-Mutaz, IS, Aminabhavi, TM. Prediction of physical properties of nanofiltration membranes using experiment and theoretical models. J Membr Sci 2008;310:321–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.11.005.Search in Google Scholar

54. Worou, CN, Kang, J, Alamou, EA, Degan, A, Yan, P, Gong, Y, et al.. High flux membrane based on in-situ formation of zirconia layer coated the polyethersulfone substrate for ions separation. Water Supply 2021. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2021.092.Search in Google Scholar

55. Liu, YL, Wei, W, Wang, XM, Yang, HW, Xie, YF. Relating the rejections of oligomeric ethylene glycols and saccharides by nanofiltration: implication for membrane pore size determination. Separ Purif Technol 2018;205:151–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.05.042.Search in Google Scholar

56. Shin, MG, Choi, W, Park, SJ, Jeon, S, Hong, S, Lee, JH. Critical review and comprehensive analysis of trace organic compound (TOrC) removal with polyamide RO/NF membranes: mechanisms and materials. Chem Eng J 2021;427:130957.10.1016/j.cej.2021.130957Search in Google Scholar

57. Kim, S, Chu, KH, Al-Hamadani, YA, Park, CM, Jang, M, Kim, DH, et al.. Removal of contaminants of emerging concern by membranes in water and wastewater: a review. Chem Eng J 2018;335:896–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.044.Search in Google Scholar

58. Song, W, Lee, LY, Ng, HY. Nanofiltration and reverse osmosis processes for the removal of micro-pollutants. In: Varjani, S, Pandey, A, Tyagi, R, Ngo, H, Larroche, C, editors. Current developments in biotechnology and bioengineering. Elsevier; 2020:527–52 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-819594-9.00021-8Search in Google Scholar

59. Hajibabania, S, Antony, A, Leslie, G, Le-Clech, P. Relative impact of fouling and cleaning on PVDF membrane hydraulic performances. Separ Purif Technol 2012;90:204–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.03.001.Search in Google Scholar

60. Plakas, KV, Karabelas, AJ. A systematic study on triazine retention by fouled with humic substances NF/ULPRO membranes. Separ Purif Technol 2011;80:246–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.05.003.Search in Google Scholar

61. Zazouli, MA, Cherati, JY, Balarak, D, Ebrahimi, M, Mahdavi, Y. Investigating the removal rate of acid Blue 113 from aqueous solution by canola (Brassica Napus). J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2013;22:70–8.Search in Google Scholar

62. Hernando, NP. Nanofiltration and hybrid sorption: ultrafiltration processes for improving water quality (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya; 2017.Search in Google Scholar

63. Valamohammadi, E, Behdarvand, F, Tofighy, MA, Mohammadi, T. Preparation of positively charged thin-film nanocomposite membranes based on the reaction between hydrolyzed polyacrylonitrile containing carbon nanomaterials and HPEI for water treatment application. Separ Purif Technol 2020;242:116826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116826.Search in Google Scholar

64. Ritt, CL, Werber, JR, Wang, M, Yang, Z, Zhao, Y, Kulik, HJ, Elimelech, M. Ionization behavior of nanoporous polyamide membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2020;117:30191–200. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008421117.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

65. Raggam, S. Advances of materials for ion-selective membranes for extraction of lithium ions out of saline water (Doctoral dissertation). University of Leoben; 2021.Search in Google Scholar

66. Chen, Y, Liu, F, Wang, Y, Lin, H, Han, L. A tight nanofiltration membrane with multi-charged nanofilms for high rejection to concentrated salts. J Membr Sci 2017;537:407–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.05.036.Search in Google Scholar

67. Liu, C, Shi, L, Wang, R. Crosslinked layer-by-layer polyelectrolyte nanofiltration hollow fiber membrane for low-pressure water softening with the presence of SO42− in feed water. J Membr Sci 2015;486:169–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.050.Search in Google Scholar

68. Shi, X, Tal, G, Hankins, NP, Gitis, V. Fouling and cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes: a review. J Water Process Eng 2014;1:121–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2014.04.003.Search in Google Scholar

69. Bowen, WR, Welfoot, JS. Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration—critical assessment and model development. Chem Eng Sci 2002;57:1121–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2509(01)00413-4.Search in Google Scholar

70. Oatley, DL, Llenas, L, Pérez, R, Williams, PM, Martínez-Lladó, X, Rovira, M. Review of the dielectric properties of nanofiltration membranes and verification of the single oriented layer approximation. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2012;173:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2012.02.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

71. Ang, MB, Trilles, CA, De Guzman, MR, Pereira, JM, Aquino, RR, Huang, SH, et al.. Improved performance of thin-film nanocomposite nanofiltration membranes as induced by embedded polydopamine-coated silica nanoparticles. Separ Purif Technol 2019;224:113–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.05.018.Search in Google Scholar

72. Zhao, S, Yao, Y, Ba, C, Zheng, W, Economy, J, Wang, P. Enhancing the performance of polyethylenimine modified nanofiltration membrane by coating a layer of sulfonated poly (ether ether ketone) for removing sulfamerazine. J Membr Sci 2015;492:620–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.017.Search in Google Scholar

73. Ong, YK, Li, FY, Sun, SP, Zhao, BW, Liang, CZ, Chung, TS. Nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes for textile wastewater treatment: lab-scale and pilot-scale studies. Chem Eng Sci 2014;114:51–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2014.04.007.Search in Google Scholar

74. Xu, S, Lu, D, Wang, P, Zhao, Y, Sun, Y, Qi, J, et al.. Polyphenol engineered membranes with dually charged sandwich structure for low-pressure molecular separation. J Membr Sci 2020;601:117885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.117885.Search in Google Scholar

75. Nghiem, LD, Coleman, PJ. NF/RO filtration of the hydrophobic ionogenic compound triclosan: transport mechanisms and the influence of membrane fouling. Separ Purif Technol 2008;62:709–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2008.03.027.Search in Google Scholar

76. Li, M, Sun, F, Shang, W, Zhang, X, Dong, W, Dong, Z, et al.. Removal mechanisms of perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) by nanofiltration: roles of membrane-contaminant interactions. Chem Eng J 2021;406:126814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126814.Search in Google Scholar

77. Souza, VC, Quadri, MG. Organic–inorganic hybrid membranes in separation processes: a 10-year review. Braz J Chem Eng 2013;30:683–700. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-66322013000400001.Search in Google Scholar

78. Zhao, X, Zhang, R, Liu, Y, He, M, Su, Y, Gao, C, et al.. Antifouling membrane surface construction: chemistry plays a critical role. J Membr Sci 2018;551:145–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.01.039.Search in Google Scholar

79. Azaïs, A, Mendret, J, Gassara, S, Petit, E, Deratani, A, Brosillon, S. Nanofiltration for wastewater reuse: counteractive effects of fouling and matrice on the rejection of pharmaceutical active compounds. Separ Purif Technol 2014;133:313–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2014.07.007.Search in Google Scholar

80. Zhao, F, Xu, K, Ren, H, Ding, L, Geng, J, Zhang, Y. Combined effects of organic matter and calcium on biofouling of nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 2015;486:177–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.032.Search in Google Scholar

81. Semião, AJ, Schäfer, AI. Removal of adsorbing estrogenic micropollutants by nanofiltration membranes. Part A—experimental evidence. J Membr Sci 2013;431:244–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.11.080.Search in Google Scholar

82. Zhu, CY, Zhang, X, Xu, ZK. Polyamide‐based membranes consisting of nanocomposite interlayers for high performance nanofiltration. J Appl Polym Sci 2021;138:49940. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.49940.Search in Google Scholar

83. David, AB. Removal of low MW organic pollutants by a membrane process (Doctoral dissertation). Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; 2011.Search in Google Scholar

84. Singh, R, Bhadouria, R, Singh, P, Kumar, A, Pandey, S, Singh, VK. Nanofiltration technology for removal of pathogens present in drinking water. In: Waterborne pathogens. Oxford/Cambridge: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2020:463–89 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-818783-8.00021-9Search in Google Scholar

85. Patel, Y, Janusas, G, Palevicius, A, Vilkauskas, A. Development of nanoporous AAO membrane for nano filtration using the acoustophoresis method. Sensors 2020;20:3833. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20143833.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

86. Bishoge, OK, Zhang, L, Suntu, SL, Jin, H, Zewde, AA, Qi, Z. Remediation of water and wastewater by using engineered nanomaterials: a review. J Environ Sci Health Part A 2018;53:537–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2018.1424991.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

87. Khanzada, NK, Farid, MU, Kharraz, JA, Choi, J, Tang, CY, Nghiem, LD, et al.. Removal of organic micropollutants using advanced membrane-based water and wastewater treatment: a review. J Membr Sci 2020;598:117672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117672.Search in Google Scholar

88. Qiu, Z, Ji, X, He, C. Fabrication of a loose nanofiltration candidate from polyacrylonitrile/graphene oxide hybrid membrane via thermally induced phase separation. J Hazard Mater 2018;360:122–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.08.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

89. Pervez, MN, Balakrishnan, M, Hasan, SW, Choo, KH, Zhao, Y, Cai, Y, et al.. A critical review on nanomaterials membrane bioreactor (NMs-MBR) for wastewater treatment. NPJ Clean Water 2020;3:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-020-00090-2.Search in Google Scholar

90. Kamali, M, Suhas, DP, Costa, ME, Capela, I, Aminabhavi, TM. Sustainability considerations in membrane-based technologies for industrial effluents treatment. Chem Eng J 2019;368:474–94 (change). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.075.Search in Google Scholar

91. Rout, PR, Zhang, TC, Bhunia, P, Surampalli, RY. Treatment technologies for emerging contaminants in wastewater treatment plants: a review. Sci Total Environ 2021;753:141990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141990.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

92. Shen, Y, Jiang, B, Xing, Y. Recent advances in the application of magnetic Fe3O4 nanomaterials for the removal of emerging contaminants. Environ Sci Pollut Control Ser 2021;28:7599–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11877-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

93. Acero, JL, Benitez, FJ, Teva, F, Leal, AI. Retention of emerging micropollutants from UP water and a municipal secondary effluent by ultrafiltration and nanofiltration. Chem Eng J 2010;163:264–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.07.060.Search in Google Scholar

94. Hu, JY, Jin, X, Ong, SL. Rejection of estrone by nanofiltration: influence of solution chemistry. J Membr Sci 2007;302:188–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.06.043.Search in Google Scholar

95. Bellona, C, Drewes, JE. The role of membrane surface charge and solute physico-chemical properties in the rejection of organic acids by NF membranes. J Membr Sci 2005;249:227–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.09.041.Search in Google Scholar

96. Cartagena, P, El Kaddouri, M, Cases, V, Trapote, A, Prats, D. Reduction of emerging micropollutants, organic matter, nutrients and salinity from real wastewater by combined MBR-NF/RO treatment. Separ Purif Technol 2013;110:132–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.03.024.Search in Google Scholar

97. Chang, EE, Chang, YC, Liang, CH, Huang, CP, Chiang, PC. Identifying the rejection mechanism for nanofiltration membranes fouled by humic acid and calcium ions exemplified by acetaminophen, sulfamethoxazole, and triclosan. J Hazard Mater 2012;221:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.03.051.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

98. Chon, K, Sarp, S, Lee, S, Lee, JH, Lopez-Ramirez, JA, Cho, J. Evaluation of a membrane bioreactor and nanofiltration for municipal wastewater reclamation: trace contaminant control and fouling mitigation. Desalination 2011;272:128–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.01.002.Search in Google Scholar

99. D’Haese, A, Le-Clech, P, Van Nevel, S, Verbeken, K, Cornelissen, ER, Khan, SJ, et al.. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up. Water Res 2013;47:5232–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.06.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

100. García-Vaquero, N, Lee, E, Castañeda, RJ, Cho, J, López-Ramírez, JA. Comparison of drinking water pollutant removal using a nanofiltration pilot plant powered by renewable energy and a conventional treatment facility. Desalination 2014;347:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.05.036.Search in Google Scholar

101. Gur-Reznik, S, Koren-Menashe, I, Heller-Grossman, L, Rufel, O, Dosoretz, CG. Influence of seasonal and operating conditions on the rejection of pharmaceutical active compounds by RO and NF membranes. Desalination 2011;277:250–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.029.Search in Google Scholar

102. Kim, JH, Park, PK, Lee, CH, Kwon, HH. Surface modification of nanofiltration membranes to improve the removal of organic micro-pollutants (EDCs and PhACs) in drinking water treatment: graft polymerization and cross-linking followed by functional group substitution. J Membr Sci 2008;321:190–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.055.Search in Google Scholar

103. Kimura, K, Iwase, T, Kita, S, Watanabe, Y. Influence of residual organic macromolecules produced in biological wastewater treatment processes on removal of pharmaceuticals by NF/RO membranes. Water Res 2009;43:3751–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.05.042.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

104. Košutić, K, Dolar, D, Ašperger, D, Kunst, B. Removal of antibiotics from a model wastewater by RO/NF membranes. Separ Purif Technol 2007;53:244–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2006.07.015.Search in Google Scholar

105. Krzeminski, P, Schwermer, C, Wennberg, A, Langford, K, Vogelsang, C. Occurrence of UV filters, fragrances and organophosphate flame retardants in municipal WWTP effluents and their removal during membrane post-treatment. J Hazard Mater 2017;323:166–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.08.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

106. Koyuncu, I, Arikan, OA, Wiesner, MR, Rice, C. Removal of hormones and antibiotics by nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 2008;309:94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.10.010.Search in Google Scholar

107. Lee, S, Quyet, N, Lee, E, Kim, S, Lee, S, Jung, YD, et al.. Efficient removals of tris (2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP) and perchlorate using NF membrane filtrations. Desalination 2008;221:234–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.054.Search in Google Scholar

108. Sanyal, O, Sommerfeld, AN, Lee, I. Design of ultrathin nanostructured polyelectrolyte-based membranes with high perchlorate rejection and high permeability. Separ Purif Technol 2015;145:113–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.03.011.Search in Google Scholar

109. Yoon, J, Amy, G, Chung, J, Sohn, J, Yoon, Y. Removal of toxic ions (chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate) using reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, and ultrafiltration membranes. Chemosphere 2009;77:228–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.07.028.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

110. Plakas, KV, Karabelas, AJ. Removal of pesticides from water by NF and RO membranes—a review. Desalination 2012;287:255–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.003.Search in Google Scholar

111. Mendez, E, González-Fuentes, MA, Rebollar-Perez, G, Méndez-Albores, A, Torres, E. Emerging pollutant treatments in wastewater: cases of antibiotics and hormones. J Environ Sci Health Part A 2017;52:235–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2016.1253391.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

112. Van der Bruggen, B, Everaert, K, Wilms, D, Vandecasteele, C. Application of nanofiltration for removal of pesticides, nitrate and hardness from ground water: rejection properties and economic evaluation. J Membr Sci 2001;193:239–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-7388(01)00517-8.Search in Google Scholar

113. Hidalgo, AM, León, G, Gómez, M, Murcia, MD, Barbosa, DS, Blanco, P. Application of the solution–diffusion model for the removal of atrazine using a nanofiltration membrane. Desalination Water Treat 2013;51:2244–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.734720.Search in Google Scholar

114. Musbah, I, Cicéron, D, Saboni, A, Alexandrova, S. Retention of pesticides and metabolites by nanofiltration by effects of size and dipole moment. Desalination 2013;313:51–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.11.016.Search in Google Scholar

115. Karimi, H, Rahimpour, A, Shirzad Kebria, MR. Pesticides removal from water using modified piperazine-based nanofiltration (NF) membranes. Desalination Water Treat 2016;57:24844–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2016.1156580.Search in Google Scholar

116. Dražević, E, Košutić, K, Dananić, V, Pavlović, DM. Coating layer effect on performance of thin film nanofiltration membrane in removal of organic solutes. Separ Purif Technol 2013;118:530–9.10.1016/j.seppur.2013.07.031Search in Google Scholar

117. Qin, H, Guo, W, Huang, X, Gao, P, Xiao, H. Preparation of yttria-stabilized ZrO2 nanofiltration membrane by reverse micelles-mediated sol–gel process and its application in pesticide wastewater treatment. J Eur Ceram Soc 2020;40:145–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.09.023.Search in Google Scholar

118. Tateoka, MS, Schöntag, JM, Petrus, JC, Sens, ML. Removal of carbamates in drinking water by nanofiltration in tangential flow. Acta Sci Technol 2018;40. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v40i1.30756.Search in Google Scholar

119. Bhattacharya, A. Remediation of pesticide‐polluted waters through membranes. Separ Purif Rev 2006;35:1–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/15422110500536151.Search in Google Scholar

120. Shah, AD, Huang, CH, Kim, JH. Mechanisms of antibiotic removal by nanofiltration membranes: model development and application. J Membr Sci 2012;389:234–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.10.034.Search in Google Scholar

121. Liu, P, Zhang, H, Feng, Y, Yang, F, Zhang, J. Removal of trace antibiotics from wastewater: a systematic study of nanofiltration combined with ozone-based advanced oxidation processes. Chem Eng J 2014;240:211–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.11.057.Search in Google Scholar

122. Oller, I, Miralles-Cuevas, S, Aguera, A, Malato, S. Monitoring and removal of organic micro-contaminants by combining membrane technologies with advanced oxidation processes. Curr Org Chem 2018;22:1103–19. https://doi.org/10.2174/1385272822666180404152113.Search in Google Scholar

123. Sadmani, AA, Andrews, RC, Bagley, DM. Nanofiltration of pharmaceutically active and endocrine disrupting compounds as a function of compound interactions with DOM fractions and cations in natural water. Separ Purif Technol 2014;122:462–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.12.003.Search in Google Scholar

124. Power, A, Chandra, S, Chapman, J. Graphene, electrospun membranes and granular activated carbon for eliminating heavy metals, pesticides and bacteria in water and wastewater treatment processes. Analyst 2018;143:5629–45. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8an00922h.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

125. Taheran, M, Brar, SK, Verma, M, Surampalli, RY, Zhang, TC, Valéro, JR. Membrane processes for removal of pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs) from water and wastewaters. Sci Total Environ 2016;547:60–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.139.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

126. Bellona, C, Marts, M, Drewes, JE. The effect of organic membrane fouling on the properties and rejection characteristics of nanofiltration membranes. Separ Purif Technol 2010;74:44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2010.05.006.Search in Google Scholar

127. Yangali-Quintanilla, V, Sadmani, A, McConville, M, Kennedy, M, Amy, G. Rejection of pharmaceutically active compounds and endocrine disrupting compounds by clean and fouled nanofiltration membranes. Water Res 2009;43:2349–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.02.027.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

128. Khansary, MA, Mellat, M, Saadat, SH, Fasihi-Ramandi, M, Kamali, M, Taheri, RA. An enquiry on appropriate selection of polymers for preparation of polymeric nanosorbents and nanofiltration/ultrafiltration membranes for hormone micropollutants removal from water effluents. Chemosphere 2017;168:91–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.049.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

129. Yoon, Y, Westerhoff, P, Snyder, SA, Wert, EC, Yoon, J. Removal of endocrine disrupting compounds and pharmaceuticals by nanofiltration and ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination 2007;202:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.12.033.Search in Google Scholar

130. Radjenović, J, Petrović, M, Ventura, F, Barceló, D. Rejection of pharmaceuticals in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane drinking water treatment. Water Res 2008;42:3601–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.05.020.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

131. Wang, Y, Wang, X, Li, M, Dong, J, Sun, C, Chen, G. Removal of pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) from municipal waste water with integrated membrane systems, MBR-RO/NF. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2018;15:269. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020269.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

132. Tlili, I, Alkanhal, TA. Nanotechnology for water purification: electrospun nanofibrous membrane in water and wastewater treatment. J Water Reuse Desalination 2019;9:232–48. https://doi.org/10.2166/wrd.2019.057.Search in Google Scholar

133. Biswas, I. Spatial and temporal evolution of fouling phenomena in membrane systems. Hammond: Purdue University; 2011.Search in Google Scholar

134. Wang, XM, Li, B, Zhang, T, Li, XY. Performance of nanofiltration membrane in rejecting trace organic compounds: experiment and model prediction. Desalination 2015;370:7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.05.010.Search in Google Scholar

135. Wang, H, Heil, D, Ren, ZJ, Xu, P. Removal and fate of trace organic compounds in microbial fuel cells. Chemosphere 2015;125:94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.11.048.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

136. Jose, K, Gedeon, FL, Cheng, CH. Organic–inorganic hybrid membranes for agricultural wastewater treatment. In: Abdelrasoul, A, editor. London, United Kingdom: IntechOpen; 2020.10.5772/intechopen.86787Search in Google Scholar

137. Wu, W, Zhang, X, Qin, L, Li, X, Meng, Q, Shen, C, et al.. Enhanced MPBR with polyvinylpyrrolidone-graphene oxide/PVDF hollow fiber membrane for efficient ammonia nitrogen wastewater treatment and high-density Chlorella cultivation. Chem Eng J 2020;379:122368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.122368.Search in Google Scholar

138. Huang, Z, Gong, B, Huang, CP, Pan, SY, Wu, P, Dang, Z, et al.. Performance evaluation of integrated adsorption-nanofiltration system for emerging compounds removal: exemplified by caffeine, diclofenac and octylphenol. J Environ Manag 2019;231:121–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.092.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Published Online: 2021-10-13

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Influence of lime (CaO) on low temperature leaching of some types of bauxite from Guinea
  4. Ethnobotanical survey, phytoconstituents and antibacterial investigation of Rapanea melanophloeos (L.) Mez. bark, fruit and leaf extracts
  5. Catalytic properties of supramolecular polymetallated porphyrins
  6. Lignin-based polymers
  7. Bio-based polyhydroxyalkanoates blends and composites
  8. Biodegradable poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT)
  9. Repurposing tires – alternate energy source?
  10. Theoretical investigation of the stability, reactivity, and the interaction of methyl-substituted peridinium-based ionic liquids
  11. Polymeric membranes for biomedical applications
  12. Design of locally sourced activated charcoal filter from maize cob for wastewater decontamination: an approach to fight waste with waste
  13. Synthesis of biologically active heterocyclic compounds from allenic and acetylenic nitriles and related compounds
  14. Magnetic measurement methods to probe nanoparticle–matrix interactions
  15. Health and exposure risk assessment of heavy metals in rainwater samples from selected locations in Rivers State, Nigeria
  16. Evaluation of raw, treated and effluent water quality from selected water treatment plants: a case study of Lagos Water Corporation
  17. A chemoinformatic analysis of atoms, scaffolds and functional groups in natural products
  18. Hemicyanine dyes
  19. Thermodynamics of the micellization of quaternary based cationic surfactants in triethanolamine-water media: a conductometry study
  20. Compounds isolated from hexane fraction of Alternanthera brasiliensis show synergistic activity against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
  21. Internal structures and mechanical properties of magnetic gels and suspensions
  22. SPIONs and magnetic hybrid materials: Synthesis, toxicology and biomedical applications
  23. Magnetic field controlled behavior of magnetic gels studied using particle-based simulations
  24. The microstructure of magnetorheological materials characterized by means of computed X-ray microtomography
  25. Core-modified porphyrins: novel building blocks in chemistry
  26. Anticancer potential of indole derivatives: an update
  27. Novel drug design and bioinformatics: an introduction
  28. Multi-objective optimization of CCUS supply chains for European countries with higher carbon dioxide emissions
  29. Exergy analysis of an atmospheric residue desulphurization hydrotreating process for a crude oil refinery
  30. Development in nanomembrane-based filtration of emerging contaminants
  31. Supply chain optimization framework for CO2 capture, utilization, and storage in Germany
  32. Naturally occurring heterocyclic anticancer compounds
  33. Part-II- in silico drug design: application and success
  34. Advances in biopolymer composites and biomaterials for the removal of emerging contaminants
  35. Nanobiocatalysts and photocatalyst in dye degradation
  36. 3D tumor model – a platform for anticancer drug development
  37. Hydrogen production via water splitting over graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4 )-based photocatalysis
https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2021-0057
Keywords for this article
drinking water; emerging contaminants; filtration; nanomembrane; reclaimed water

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Influence of lime (CaO) on low temperature leaching of some types of bauxite from Guinea
  4. Ethnobotanical survey, phytoconstituents and antibacterial investigation of Rapanea melanophloeos (L.) Mez. bark, fruit and leaf extracts
  5. Catalytic properties of supramolecular polymetallated porphyrins
  6. Lignin-based polymers
  7. Bio-based polyhydroxyalkanoates blends and composites
  8. Biodegradable poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT)
  9. Repurposing tires – alternate energy source?
  10. Theoretical investigation of the stability, reactivity, and the interaction of methyl-substituted peridinium-based ionic liquids
  11. Polymeric membranes for biomedical applications
  12. Design of locally sourced activated charcoal filter from maize cob for wastewater decontamination: an approach to fight waste with waste
  13. Synthesis of biologically active heterocyclic compounds from allenic and acetylenic nitriles and related compounds
  14. Magnetic measurement methods to probe nanoparticle–matrix interactions
  15. Health and exposure risk assessment of heavy metals in rainwater samples from selected locations in Rivers State, Nigeria
  16. Evaluation of raw, treated and effluent water quality from selected water treatment plants: a case study of Lagos Water Corporation
  17. A chemoinformatic analysis of atoms, scaffolds and functional groups in natural products
  18. Hemicyanine dyes
  19. Thermodynamics of the micellization of quaternary based cationic surfactants in triethanolamine-water media: a conductometry study
  20. Compounds isolated from hexane fraction of Alternanthera brasiliensis show synergistic activity against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
  21. Internal structures and mechanical properties of magnetic gels and suspensions
  22. SPIONs and magnetic hybrid materials: Synthesis, toxicology and biomedical applications
  23. Magnetic field controlled behavior of magnetic gels studied using particle-based simulations
  24. The microstructure of magnetorheological materials characterized by means of computed X-ray microtomography
  25. Core-modified porphyrins: novel building blocks in chemistry
  26. Anticancer potential of indole derivatives: an update
  27. Novel drug design and bioinformatics: an introduction
  28. Multi-objective optimization of CCUS supply chains for European countries with higher carbon dioxide emissions
  29. Exergy analysis of an atmospheric residue desulphurization hydrotreating process for a crude oil refinery
  30. Development in nanomembrane-based filtration of emerging contaminants
  31. Supply chain optimization framework for CO2 capture, utilization, and storage in Germany
  32. Naturally occurring heterocyclic anticancer compounds
  33. Part-II- in silico drug design: application and success
  34. Advances in biopolymer composites and biomaterials for the removal of emerging contaminants
  35. Nanobiocatalysts and photocatalyst in dye degradation
  36. 3D tumor model – a platform for anticancer drug development
  37. Hydrogen production via water splitting over graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4 )-based photocatalysis
Sign up now to receive a 20% welcome discount
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psr-2021-0057/html
Scroll to top button