Engagement in Chinese criminal judgments
-
Guang Shi
,
Xi Wang
Abstract
Based on the engagement system in Appraisal Theory and taking 100 Chinese criminal judgments as data, this paper analyzes the distribution features and interpersonal functions of engagement resources in Chinese criminal judgments. The findings are as follows. First, in Chinese criminal judgments, dialogic contractive resources outnumber dialogic expansive ones. Of the nine types of engagement resources, Deny takes the largest proportion. Entertain, Acknowledge, Pronounce, and Endorse are also favored by judges, while Counter, Endorse+Pronounce, Concede, Endorse+Acknowledge, and Distance are much less favored. Second, the dialogic space is adjusted in different parts of judgments due to different engagement strategies, narrowing down in the Head, Fact, and Reason parts, then nearly closing up in the Result part, and finally opening up in the Ending part. Third, Deny, Pronounce, Endorse+Pronounce, Endorse, and Distance are used to show that criminal judgments are just, authoritative, persuasive, and compulsory. By acknowledging the arguments and submissions that have been presented, judges are showing respect for the litigation rights of the various parties, while the featured strategies of Counter, Concede, and Entertain increase the acceptability of the judgments.
References
Bhatia, V. K. 1993. Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar
Du, J. B. 2003. “On the research and development of Legal Linguistics”. Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies 14(1). 14–17.Suche in Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar (2nd edition). London: Edward Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar
He, J. Q. and H. Q. He. 2016. “Pragmatic interpretation of criminal judgments”. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University 16(1). 112–116+133.Suche in Google Scholar
Hood, S. 2010. Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230274662Suche in Google Scholar
Huang, P. 2010. “Interpersonal meaning of hedges in legal texts – A case study of Chinese judgments”. Academic Exchange 2. 159–161.Suche in Google Scholar
Hyland, K. 2005. “Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse”. Discourse Studies 7(2). 173–192.10.1177/1461445605050365Suche in Google Scholar
Iedema, R., S. Feez and P. R. R. White. 1994. Media literacy. Sydney: Disadvantaged Schools Program, NSW Department of School Education. Extract available at: https://www.grammatics.com/appraisal/media/medialit-comment.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar
Jiang, T. and X. Yang. 2018. “A comparative study of authorship construction in English and Chinese academic papers on law: An engagement perspective”. Journal of Xi’an International Studies University 26(4). 8–13.Suche in Google Scholar
Kurzon, D. 2001. “The politeness of judges: American and English judicial behaviour”. Journal of Pragmatics 33(1). 61–85.10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00123-XSuche in Google Scholar
Li, D. 2011. “Intertextuality of civil judgments”. Journal of Language and Literature Studies 21. 73–74.Suche in Google Scholar
Li, S. F. 2008. “A study of interpersonal meaning in Chinese criminal judicial judgements”. Foreign Language Research 2. 60–64.Suche in Google Scholar
Maley, Y. 1994. The language of the law. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. 2004. “Mourning – how we get aligned”. Discourse and Society 15(2/3). 321–344.10.1177/0957926504041022Suche in Google Scholar
Martin. J. R. and D. Rose. 2003. Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. and P. R. R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230511910Suche in Google Scholar
Mazzi, D. 2010. “ʻThis argument fails for two reasons…’: A linguistic analysis of judicial evaluation strategies in US Supreme Court judgments”. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 23(4). 373–385.10.1007/s11196-010-9162-0Suche in Google Scholar
Miller, D. R. 2004. “…To meet our common challenge”: Engagement strategies of alignment and alienation in current US international discourse. In Gotti, M. and C. Candlin (eds.), Intercultural discourse in domain-specific English. Textus: Sense Publisher.Suche in Google Scholar
Nie, Y. J. 2013. “The study of civil judgments under appraisal system: Based on the engagement as a dialogue”. Journal of Xidian University 4. 91–96.Suche in Google Scholar
Pan, H. T. 2008. “On the principles of English translation of legal terms in Chinese criminal judgments”. Journal of Petroleum Educational Institute of Xinjiang 1. 98–101.Suche in Google Scholar
Pan, Q. Y. 2002. Comments on legal documents. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Shi, G. 2020. “Speech reporting in Chinese criminal judgements”. Chinese Semiotic Studies 16(2). 277–296.10.1515/css-2020-0016Suche in Google Scholar
Sun, Y. X. 2010. “An appraisal analysis of engagement resources of narrative public service advertisement”. Journal of Sichuan University of Science and Engineering 25(1). 129–133.Suche in Google Scholar
Swain, E. 2007. Constructing an effective ‘voice’ in academic discussion writing: An appraisal theory perspective”. In McCabe, A., M. O’Donnell and R. Whittaker (eds.), Advances in language and education. London: Continuum. 166–184.Suche in Google Scholar
Thompson, G. 1996. Introducing functional grammar. London: Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar
Thompson, G. and Y. Ye. 1991. “Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers”. Applied Linguistics 12(4). 365–382.10.1093/applin/12.4.365Suche in Google Scholar
Wang, J. 2010. A contrastive analysis of Chinese and American court judgments: From the perspective of discourse semantics. (MA Thesis, Shandong Normal University.)Suche in Google Scholar
Wang, Z. H. 2012. Collection of Martin’s works.Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
White, P. R. R. 1998. Telling media tales: The news story as rhetoric. (PhD dissertation, University of Sydney.)Suche in Google Scholar
White, P. R. R. 2005. Subjectivity, evaluation and point of view in media discourse. In: Coffin, C. and K. O’Halloran (eds.), Grammar, text and context: A reader. London/New York: Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar
Xin, B. 2000. Intertextuality from a critical perspective. Suzhou: Suzhou University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Yuan, C. Y. 2008. “Interpersonal meanings in police interrogations: An appraisal-engagement perspective”. Modern Foreign Languages 2. 141–149.Suche in Google Scholar
Zhang, D. Q. 2014. “Evaluation and voice of academic papers: An engagement perspective”. Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics 2. 97–103.Suche in Google Scholar
Zhang, F. L. and L. P. Zhang. 2014. “On the translation of criminal judgments from the perspective of pragmatic enrichment”. Chinese Translators Journal 35(3). 93–97.Suche in Google Scholar
Zhang, Q. 2019. “Comparative study on ancient judgments and modern criminal judgments in China”. Journal of Comparative Law 3. 131–141.Suche in Google Scholar
Zhang, Q. and M. Y. Gong. 2013. “A comparative study of modality in American and Chinese criminal judgements”. Journal of Shanxi University 1. 82–87.Suche in Google Scholar
Zhu, D. H. 2011. “A corpus-based study of evaluative language patterns on argumentations by Chinese English major students from attitude and engagement perspectives”. Journal of Beijing International Studies University 190(2). 67–74.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2022 Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Table of contents
- A dependent case approach to complex event nominals in standard Arabic
- Word-formation and reduplication in standard Arabic: A new distributed morphology approach
- Predicting foreign language skills based on first languages: The role of lexical distance and relative morphological complexity
- Formulaic language in oral academic discourse socialization of graduate students in a Northern Cyprus university
- ‘Leftover women’: A sociolinguistic study of gender bias in Chinese
- The syntax of plurals of collective and mass nouns: Views from Jordanian Arabic
- Attitudes of Nigerian expatriates towards accents of English
- Synthetic -BLE compounds VS. -BLE adjectives: Issues in the external and internal syntax
- English loan translations in Polish in the area of computers: Syntactic aspects
- Engagement in Chinese criminal judgments
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Table of contents
- A dependent case approach to complex event nominals in standard Arabic
- Word-formation and reduplication in standard Arabic: A new distributed morphology approach
- Predicting foreign language skills based on first languages: The role of lexical distance and relative morphological complexity
- Formulaic language in oral academic discourse socialization of graduate students in a Northern Cyprus university
- ‘Leftover women’: A sociolinguistic study of gender bias in Chinese
- The syntax of plurals of collective and mass nouns: Views from Jordanian Arabic
- Attitudes of Nigerian expatriates towards accents of English
- Synthetic -BLE compounds VS. -BLE adjectives: Issues in the external and internal syntax
- English loan translations in Polish in the area of computers: Syntactic aspects
- Engagement in Chinese criminal judgments
