Home Linguistics & Semiotics A dependent case approach to complex event nominals in standard Arabic
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A dependent case approach to complex event nominals in standard Arabic

  • Amer Ahmed EMAIL logo and Iryna Lenchuk
Published/Copyright: October 20, 2022

Abstract

This paper addresses case assignment in Standard Arabic (SA). It shows that the current Agree-based accounts of case in SA are problematic, as they face problems accounting for case assignment in complex event nominals. Using Baker’s (2015) dependent case theory, we argue that there are two modalities of structural case assignment in SA, i.e., the dependent case and the Agree-based case, and that the latter is only available when the former fails to apply. It is also argued that case assignment takes place at Spell Out, the point where phase heads are merged into the structure. We provide evidence that vP in SA is a soft phase and we claim that v in SA is incapable of assigning the accusative case to the object, due to v’s deficiency. We also claim that a DP of the complex nominal type in SA is a hard phase. SA PRO is argued to lack a case feature, and it is therefore neither a proper goal for case in the Agree-based case mechanism, nor is it a proper case trigger/competitor in the dependent case mechanism. We believe that the proposed account solves the problems that previous accounts of case in SA face.


Department of English Language and Literature Dhofar University Salalah, Zufar 211 Oman

References

Ahmed, A. 2016. Case in Standard Arabic: A dependent case approach. (PhD thesis, York University.)Search in Google Scholar

Ahmed, A. 2015. “On agreement affixes, incorporated pronouns and clitics in Standard Arabic”. SKY Journal of Linguistics 28. 67–102.Search in Google Scholar

Adger, D. 2003. Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199243709.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Al-Balushi, R. 2012. “Why verbless sentences in Standard Arabic are verbless”. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 57(1). 1–30.10.1017/S0008413100002188Search in Google Scholar

Al-Balushi, R. 2011. Case in Standard Arabic: The untraveled paths. (PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.)Search in Google Scholar

Baker, M. 2015. Case: Its principles and parameters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107295186Search in Google Scholar

Baker, M. 1988. Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bardeas, S. M. 2009. The syntax of the Arabic DP. (PhD thesis, The University of York.)Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2008. “On phases”. In: Freidin, R., C.P. Otero and M.L. Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roget Vergnaud. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 133–166.10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2007. “Approaching UG from below”. In: Sauerland, U. and H.-M. Gartner (eds.), Interfaces + recursion=language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the view from syntax/ semantics. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 1–31.10.1515/9783110207552-001Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2005. “Three factors in language design”. Linguistic Inquiry 36(1). 1–22.10.1162/0024389052993655Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2001. “Derivation by phase”. In: Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), A life in language. MIT: MIT Press. 1–52.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2000. “Minimalist inquiries: The framework”. In: Martin, R., D. Miachaels and J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on Minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 89–155.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dékány, É. 2018. “Approaches to head movement: A critical assessment”. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics 3(1). 1–43.10.5334/gjgl.316Search in Google Scholar

Dékány, É. 2014. “Argument structure and functional projections in Old Hungarian verbal gerunds”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 61(3). 317–361.10.1556/ALing.61.2014.3.4Search in Google Scholar

Fassi Fehri, A. 2012. Key features and parameters in Arabic grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.182Search in Google Scholar

Fassi Fehri, A. 1999. ʔal-muʕjamu l-ʕarabiyy: namaaðiju taḥliiliyatun jadiida [The Arbic lexicon: New analytical models]. Tubqal Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Fassi Fehri, A. 1993. Issues in the structure of Arabic clauses and words. Kluwer Academic publishers: Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-017-1986-5Search in Google Scholar

Gallego, Á. J. 2010. Phase theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/la.152Search in Google Scholar

Grimshaw, J. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hazout, I. 1991. Verbal nouns: Theta theoretic studies in Hebrew and Arabic. Amherst: Graduate Linguistics Student Association, U. of Massachusetts.Search in Google Scholar

Kremers, J.M. 2003. The Arabic noun phrase: A minimalist approach. (PhD thesis, University of Nijmegen.)Search in Google Scholar

Maling, J. 2009. “The case tier: A hierarchical approach to morphological case”. In: Malchukov, A. and A. Spenser (eds.), The Oxoford handbook of case. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 72–87.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199206476.013.0006Search in Google Scholar

Moutaoukil, A. 1987. Min l-binyati l-ḥamiliyati ʔilaa l-binyati l-mukawwiniyati: ʔalwaḏiifatu l-mafʕuul-u fii l-luġat-i l-ʕarabiyati [From the predicational structure to the constitument structure: The object’s function in Arabic]. Casablanca: Alṯaqaafatu for publishing and distribution.Search in Google Scholar

Ouhalla, J. 1994. “Verb movement and word order in Arabic”. In: Lightfoot, D. and N. Hornstein (eds.), Verb movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 41–72.10.1017/CBO9780511627705.004Search in Google Scholar

Soltan, U. 2011. “On issues of Arabic syntax: An essay in syntactic argumentation”. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 3. 236–280.10.1163/187666311X562486Search in Google Scholar

Soltan, U. 2007. On formal feature licensing in Minimalism: Aspects of Standard Arabic morphosyntax. (PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.)Search in Google Scholar

Waħiidi, M. 2000. Ɂal- ḏuruuf fii l-luɣati l-ʕarabiya [Adverbs in Arabic]. (PhD thesis, Mohammed V University, Morocco.)Search in Google Scholar

Wurmbrand, S. and Y.A. Haddad. 2016. “Cyclic spell-out derived agreement in Arabic raising constructions”. In: Haddad, Y.A. and E. Potsdam (eds.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXVIII: Papers from the Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Grainesville, Flordia 2014. 193–226.10.1075/sal.4.09wurSearch in Google Scholar

Yip, M., J. Maling and R. Jackendoff. 1987. “Case in tiers”. Language 63(2). 217–250.10.2307/415655Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-10-20
Published in Print: 2022-09-27

© 2022 Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland

Downloaded on 13.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psicl-2022-0018/html
Scroll to top button