Home Fracture behavior and deformation mechanisms of polypropylene/ethylene-propylene-diene blends
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Fracture behavior and deformation mechanisms of polypropylene/ethylene-propylene-diene blends

  • Yuhui Ao EMAIL logo , Fang Feng and Huixuan Zhang
Published/Copyright: December 10, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The fracture behavior and deformation mechanism of polypropylene (PP)/ethylene-propylene-diene rubber (EPDM) were studied by scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy analyses. The deformation mechanism was investigated under different conditions. Voids were seen under all the conditions because of matrix shear yielding, indicating that rubber particle cavitation took place during the blend fracture process; moreover, the void size and density increased as the fracture surface was approached. However, the void density and extent of elongation of the rubber particles in the deformation zone decreased with increasing test speed rate. Many voids were positioned in the rubber particles, confirming that matrix shear yielding initiated by rubber particle cavitation was the main deformation mechanism during ductile fracture in the matrix.


Corresponding author: Yuhui Ao, School of Chemistry and Life Science, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun 130012, China, e-mail:

References

[1] Dai YQ, Wang B, Wang BJ, Jiang T, Cheng SY. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2003, 68, 493–496.10.1016/S0969-806X(03)00216-0Search in Google Scholar

[2] Murillo EA, Lopez BL. Macromol. Symp. 2006, 242, 131–139.10.1002/masy.200651020Search in Google Scholar

[3] Yang H, Zhang Q, Guo M, Wang C, Du R, Fu Q. Polymer 2006, 47, 2106–2115.10.1016/j.polymer.2006.01.076Search in Google Scholar

[4] Wang Y, Zhang Q, Na B, Du R, Fu Q, Shen K. Polymer 2003, 44, 4261–4271.10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00366-5Search in Google Scholar

[5] Bucknall CB. Macromol. Symp. 1988, 16, 209–224.10.1002/masy.19880160115Search in Google Scholar

[6] Gao X, Mao L, Jin R, Zhang L, Tian M. Polym. J. 2007, 39, 1011–1017.10.1295/polymj.PJ2006166Search in Google Scholar

[7] Li Z, Kontopoulou M. J. Polym. Eng. 2006, 26, 633–653.10.1515/POLYENG.2006.26.6.633Search in Google Scholar

[8] Wal AVD, Gaymans RJ. Polymer 1999, 40, 6067–6075.10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00216-5Search in Google Scholar

[9] Wal AVD, Mulder JJ, Oderkerk J, Gaymans RJ. Polymer 1998, 39, 6781–6787.10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00170-0Search in Google Scholar

[10] Wal AVD, Nijhof R, Gaymans RJ. Polymer 1999, 40, 6031–6044.10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00213-XSearch in Google Scholar

[11] Wal AVD, Gaymans RJ. Polymer 1999, 40, 6045–6055.10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00214-1Search in Google Scholar

[12] Wal AVD, Verheul AJJ, Gaymans RJ. Polymer 1999, 40, 6057–6065.10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00215-3Search in Google Scholar

[13] Chou CJ, Vijayan K, Kirby D, Hiltner A, Baer E. J. Mater. Sci. 1988, 23, 2533–2545.10.1007/BF01111913Search in Google Scholar

[14] Janik H, Gaymans RJ, Dijkstra K. Polymer 1995, 36, 4203–4208.10.1016/0032-3861(95)92214-YSearch in Google Scholar

[15] Steenbrink AC, Janik H, Gaymans RJ. J. Mater. Sci. 1997, 32, 5505–5511.10.1023/A:1018660021125Search in Google Scholar

[16] Borggreve RJM, Gaymans RJ, Schuijer J, Housz JFI. Polymer 1987, 28, 1489–1496.10.1016/0032-3861(87)90348-XSearch in Google Scholar

[17] Liang JZ, Li RKY. J. Appl.Polym. Sci. 2000, 77, 409–417.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000711)77:2<409::AID-APP18>3.0.CO;2-NSearch in Google Scholar

[18] Ao YH, Sun SL, Tan ZY. Polym. Bull. 2007, 58, 447–455.10.1007/s00289-006-0682-4Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-3-29
Accepted: 2015-9-25
Published Online: 2015-12-10
Published in Print: 2016-9-1

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2015-0121/html
Scroll to top button