Home Physical Sciences Logical entropy of quantum dynamical systems
Article Open Access

Logical entropy of quantum dynamical systems

  • Abolfazl Ebrahimzadeh EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 20, 2016

Abstract

This paper introduces the concepts of logical entropy and conditional logical entropy of hnite partitions on a quantum logic. Some of their ergodic properties are presented. Also logical entropy of a quantum dynamical system is dehned and ergodic properties of dynamical systems on a quantum logic are investigated. Finally, the version of Kolmogorov-Sinai theorem is proved.

1 Introduction

Birkhoff and Von Neumann in [1] have introduced the quantum logic approach. Entropy is a tool to measure the amount of uncertainty in random event. Entropy has been applied in a variety of problem areas including physics, computer science, general systems theory, information theory, statistics, biology, chemistry, sociology and many other helds. Hejun Yuan, Mona Khare and Shraddha Roy, using the notion of state of quantum logic, introduced Shanon entropy of hnite partitions on a quantum logic [2-4]. The dehnition of entropy of a dynamical system might be in three stages [2, 5 , 6]. Logical entropy is a measure on set of ordered pairs [7]. In 1982, Rao, Good, Patil and Taillie dehned and studied the notion logical entropy [8-10]. Rao introduced precisely this concept as quadratic entropy [10] and in the years 2009 and 2013, this concept was discussed by Ellerman in [7, 11, 12].

The notion of Shanon entropy of quantum dynamical systems with Bayessian state was studied by Mona Khare and Shraddha Roy in [2]. In this paper, the notion of logical entropy with hnite partitions is dehned and then, logical entropy of quantum dynamical systems with Bayessian state is presented and studied. In Section 2, some basic dehnitions are presented. In Section 3, logical entropy and coditional logical entropy of partitions of a quantum logic with respect to state s are dehned and a few results about them will be presented. In the subsequent section the relations s-refinement and s are defined and logical entropy and coditional logical entropy under the relations are studied. In Section 4, logical entropy of a quantum dynamical system (L,s,φ) is dehned where L is a quantum logic and s is a Bayessian state. At the end, the version of Kolmogorov-Sinai theorem is proved.

2 Finite Partitions

At first, some basic dehnitions are presented that will be useful in further considerations.

Definition 1. [4] A quantum logic QL is a σ-orthomodular lattice, i.e., a lattice L (L, ≤, V, Λ, 0,1) with the smallest element 0 and the greatest element 1, an operation ′ : L → L such that the following properties hold for all a, b, c ∈ L:

i)a″ = a, a b ⇒ b≤ a , a V a =1, a Λ a =0;

ii) Given any finite sequence (ai)iεI,a; < a, i /= j, the join Vi∈Nai exists in L;

iii) L is orthomodular: a ≤bb = a V (b Λ a ).

Two elements a, b ∈ QL are called orthogonal if a ≤ b and denoted by a ⊥ b. A sequence (ai)i∈i is said orthogonalifai⊥aj, ∀ii/= j.

Definition 2. [4] Let L be a quantum logic. A map s : L →[0,1] is a state iff s(1) = 1 and for any orthogonal sequence (ai)iI, s(ViℇIai) = ∑iℇIs(ai).

Definition 3. [4] Let P = {a1,..., an} be a finite system of elements of a quantum logic. P is called to be a V- orthogonal system iff i=1kaiak+1,k

Definition 4.[4] A system P = {a1,..., an} ⊂ L is said to be a partition of L corresponding to a state s if:

i)P is a V-orthogonal system;

ii)s(i=1nai)=1

Note that from definition 2, we obtain i=1ns(ai)=1 s(ai)=1.

Definition 5. [4] Let the system (b1,..., bm) be any partition corresponding to a state s and a ε L. The state s is said has Bayes’ Property if s((j=1m(abj))=s(a)(a Λ bj)) = s(a).

Lemma 6.[4] Let Q = (b1,..., bm) be a partition on L, and a ε L, and the state s has Bayes’Property. Then j=1ms(abj)=s(a) s(a Λ bj ) = s(a).

3 Logical entropy of finite partitions

Let P = {a1,..., an} and Q = {b1,..., bm} be two finite partitions of a quantum logic corresponding to a state s. The common refinement of these partitions is:

P ∨ Q = {ai ∧ bj : ai ε P, bj ε R}.

Definition 7. Let P = {a1,..., an} be a partition of a quantum logic corresponding to a state s. The logical entropy of P with respect to state s is defined by:

hsl(p)=i=1ns(ai)(1s(ai)).

Since i=1ns(ai)=1, we have i=1n(s(ai))2

Definition 8. Let P = {a1,..., an} and Q ={b1,..., bm} be two partitions of a quantum logic corresponding to a state s. The conditional logical entropy of P given Q with respect to state s is defined as:

In the next theorem an upper bound for logical entropy on a quantum logic is presented.

Theorem 9.Let P be a finite partition of a quantum logic corresponding to a state s. Then

00hsl(P)11n.

Proof. Let P = (p1,...,pn) ε Rn be a probability distribution, then from [7], maximum value of the logical entropy is 0hsl(P)11n

11n.i=1ns(ai)=1,P=(s(a1),.....,s(an))

is a probability distribution and hence the proof is complete.

In the following theorem the conditional logical entropy under the common refinement of partitions is studied.

Theorem 10.Let P, Q and R be finite partitions of a quantum logic corresponding to a state s having Bayes’ Property. Then hls(P ∨ Q|R) = h1s(P|R) + h1s(Q|P ∨ R).

Proof. Let P = {a1,..., an}, Q = {b1,..., bm} and R = {c1,..., cr}. Since s has Bayes’ Property, by Lemma 6 we have

hsl(PQ|R)=i=1nj=1mk=1rs(aibjck)(s(ck)s(aibjck))=i=1nj=1mk=1rs(aibjck)(s(ck)i=1nj=1mk=1r(s(aibjck)(s(ck))2=i=1nj=1mk=1rs(aibjck)(s(ck)i=1nj=1mk=1r(s(aibjck)(s(ck))2+i=1nk=1r(s(aick))2i=1nj=1mk=1r(s(aibjck)(s(ck))2.

On the other hand we can write

hsl(P|R)=i=1nk=1rs(aibjck)(s(ck)i=1nk=1r(s(aick))2

and

hsl(Q|PR)=i=1nj=1mk=1rs(aibjck)(s(ck)(s(aick)i=1nj=1mk=1r(s(aibjck)(s(ck))2.=i=1nk=1r(s(aick))2i=1nj=1mk=1r(s(aibjck)(s(ck))2

Thus the proof is complete. □

Now the assertion of the following theorem will be proved that will be useful in further theorems.

Theorem 11. Let P and Q be finite partitions of a quantum logic corresponding to a state s having Bayes’ Property. Then .

Proof. Let P = {a1,..., an} and Q = {b1,..., bm}. From Lemma 6 we can write

hsl(PQ)=i=1nj=1ms(aibj)(1s(aibj))=i=1nj=1ms(aibj)i=1nj=1m(s(aibj))2=j=1ms(bj)i=1nj=1m(s(aibj))2

Hence the proof is complete.

In the next theorem it is proved subadditivity of logical entropy of partitions on a quantum logic.

Theorem 12.Let P and Q be finite partitions of a quantum logic corresponding to a state s having Bayes’Property. Then

i)

ii) max{h1s(P), h1s(Q)} ≤ h1s(P ∨ Q) ≤ h1s(P) + h1s(Q).

Proof. i) Let P = {a1,..., an} and Q = {b1,..., bm}. For each ai εP, we can write

j=1ms(aibj)(sbj)s(aibj))j=1ms(aibj)(j=1ms(bj)s(aibj))=s(ai)(j=1ms(bj)s(aibj))=s(ai)(1j=1ms(aibj)=(s(ai)(1s(ai)).

ii) From Theorem 11 and part i),

By Theorem 11,

Let s be a state. Two finite partitions P and Q of a quantum logic are called s-independent if s(a ∧ b) = s(a)s(b) for all a ε P, and b ε Q.

In the next theorem you observe that, for two s- independent finite partitions P and Q of a QL, h1s(P ∨ Q).= h1s(P) + h1s(Q) necessarily. Also, in this case h1s(P|Q)= h1s(P) necessarily.

Theorem 13. Let s be a state and let P and Q be s- independent finite partitions of a quantum logic. Then

i)

;

ii)

Proof. i) Since

hsl(P)=1i=1n(s(ai))21i=1n(s(bj))2=hsl(Q)

and P, Q are s-independent, we can write

hsl(PQ)=1i=1nj=1m(s(aibj))21i=1nj=1m(s(ai)2(s(bj))21(i=1n(s(ai))2)(j=1m(s(bj))2)1(i=1n(s(ai))2)(j=1m(s(bj))2)i=1n(s(ai))2+i=1n(s(ai))2=hsl(P)+i=1n(s(ai))2(1j=1m(s(bj))2)=hsl(P)+(1hsl(P)hsl(Q)=hsl(P)+hsl(Q)hsl(P)hsl(Q)

ii) Follows from i) and Theorem 11. □

Definition 14. Let P = {a1,..., an} and Q = {b1,..., bm} be two partitions of a quantum logic corresponding to a state s. We say Q is a s-rehnement of P, denoted by P ≾s Q, if there exists a partition I(1),..., I(n) of the set {1,..., m} such that ai = VjεI(i)bj for every i = 1,..., n.

Now the relation between the s-rehnement and the logical entropy of hnite partitions will be studied.

Theorem 15. Let P = {a1,..., an}, Q = {b1,..., bm} and R = {c1,..., cr} be partitions of a quantum logic corresponding to a state s. Then

i) P ≾s Q implies that

ii) If P ≾s Q and the quantum logic be distributive then

Proof. i)Since P ≾s Q, there exists a partition I(1),..., I(n) of the set {1,...,m} such that ai = VjεI(i)sbj for every i = ..., n. So from dehnition 2, s(ai) = ∑jεI(i)s(bj), therefore s(ai)(j=1ms(bj)s(aibj)) so

hsl(P)=1i=1n(s(ai))21i=1n(s(bj))2=hsl(Q)

ii) P ≾s Q implies that P ∨ R ≾s Q ∨ R, because let ai ∧ c be an arbitrary element of P ∨ R, then there exists a partition I(1),..., I(n) of the set {1,...,m} such that ai = VjεI(i)bjfor every i = 1,..., n. Therefore ai ∧ c = (VjεI(i)bj) ∨ c = VjεI(i)(bj ∨ c), hence P ∨ R ≾s Q ∨ R. Now by Theorems 11 and 15, it will be obtained

Definition 16. Let P = {a1,..., an} and Q = {b1,..., bm} be two partitions of a quantum logic corresponding to a state s. Q if for each bj ε Q there exists ai ε P with s(ai ∧ bj) = s(bj). P ≗s Q if P εOs Q and Q εOs P.

The next theorem shows that, the logical entropy and logical conditional entropy of hnite partitions of a quantum logic corresponding to a state s having Bayes’ Property, are invariant under the relation ≗s .

Theorem 17.Let P and Q be finite partitions of a quantum logic corresponding to a state s having Bayes’ Property. Then

i) P εOs Q if and only if h1s(P|Q) = 0;

ii) if P ≗s Q then h1s(P) = h1s(Q);

iii) if P ≗s Q then h1s(P|R) =h1s(Q|R);

iv) if Q ≗s R then h1s(P|Q) = h1s(P|R).

Proof. i) Let P = {a1,..., an} and Q = {b1,..., bm} and P εOs Q, then for each bj ε Q there exists ai0 ε P such that s(bj) = s(ai0 Λ bj). Since s(bj) = ΣÌu s(ai Λ bj), we obtain s(bj) = s(ai0 Λ bj) and for each i/ = j0, s(ai ∧ bj) = 0 and so h1s(P|Q) = 0. Conversely, if h1s(P|Q) = 0 then for each i, j, s(bj) = s(ai ∧ bj) or s(ai ∧ bj) = 0. For an arbitrary element bj Q, since 0= s(bj) = ΣÌu s(a; ∧ bj) we deduce that there exists an q, 1 ≤ i1 ≤ n, such that s(bj) = s(ai1 ∧ bj). ii) Since P εOs Q, by i) we have h1s(P|Q) = 0. So by theorem 11, h1s(P|Q) = h1s (P ∨ Q)- h1s (Q) = 0 and therefore h1s (P ∨ Q) = h1s (Q). Similarly if OsP, then h1s(QIP) = h1s (P ∨ Q) - h’s(P) = 0 and so h’s(P ∨ Q) = h’s(P). Hence we imply that h1s (P) = h1s (Q).

iii) We first show that OsQ implies that P ∨ RεOsQ V R. Let bj0 ∧ cko be an arbitrary element of Q ∧ R. Since OsQ, there exists aio e P such that s(aio ∧ bj0) = s(bj0). Now s((aio ∧ ck0) ∧ (bj0 ∧ c^)) = s(ai0 ∧ bj0 ∧ (ck0 ∧ ck0)) = s(aio ∧ bj0 ∧ ck0), it is sufficient to show that s(aio ∧ bj0 ∧ ck0) = s(bj0 ∧ck0). Since s has Bayes’ Property, s(aio ∧bj0) = s(bjrj) = En=i s(ai ∧ bj0). So for each i/ = io, s(ai ∧ bj0) = 0, therefore for each i/ = i0, s(ai ∧ bj0 ∧ ck0) = 0 and this implies that

s(aiobjocko)=i=1ns(aiobjocko)=s(bjocko).

Thus P ∨ RεOsQ ∧ R. By changing the role of P and Q, P —s Q implies that P ∨ R ≗sQ ∧ R. Hence from ii), h1s (PR) = h1s (PVR)- h1s (R) = h1s (Q VR)- h1s (R) = h1s (QR). iv)Weneed toshowthat OsR implies that PVQεOsPVR. Let aio ∧cko be an arbitrary element of P ∨ R. Since OsR, there exists bjo e Q such that s(bjo ∧ ck0) = s(ck0). Now s((ah ∧ bj0) ∧ (aio ∧ cko)) = s((aio ∧ aio) ∧ bjo ∧ cko) = s(aio ∧ bjo ∧ cko), it is sufficient to show that s(aio ∧bj0 ∧cko) = s(aio ∧cko). Since s has Bayes’ Property, s(bjrj ∧ cko) = s(cko) = Eh s(bj ∧ cko). So for each j = j0, s(bj ∧ cko) = 0, therefore for each j = j0, s(aio ∧ bj ∧ cko) = 0 and this implies that

s(aiobjocko)=j=1ms(aiobjocko)=s(bjocko).

Thus P ∨ Q c° P ∨ R. By changing the role of Q and R, Q —s R implies that P V Q —s P ∨ R. Now from ii), h1s (P|Q) = h1s (P ∨ Q) - h1s (Q) = h1s (P ∨ R) - h1s (R) = h1s (PR).

4 Logical entropy of quantum dynamical systems

Definition 18. [2] Let L be a quantum logic and φ : L → L be a map with the following properties:

i) φ(a ∨ b) = φ(ά) ∨ φα, ∀a, b ε L;

ii) φ(a ∧ b) = φ(a) ∧ φ(b), ∀a, b ε L;

iii) φ(a) = φ(a)), ∀a ε L.

φ : L → L with respect to a state s is called state preserving if s(φ(a)) = s(a) for every a ε L. Then the triple (L, s, φ) is said a quantum dynamical system where the state s having Bayes’ Property. In the following theorem the existence of the limit in Definition 20 is shown.

Theorem 19. Let (L, s, φ) bea quantum dynamical system and P be a partition of (L, s), then limn→∞) exists.

Proof. Let an = h1s1s . It will be shown that for p ε N, an+p ≤ an + ap and then by Theorem 4.9 in [13],

limn1nan

exists and equals infn

ann

. By Theorem 12, ii) we have

an+p=hsl(Vi=1n+p1φiP)hsl(Vi=1n1φiP)+hsl(Vi=nn+p1φiP)=an+hsl(Vi=1p1φn+iP)=an+hsl(Vi=1p1φiP)=an+ap.

The second stage and the final stage of the definition of the logical entropy of a quantum dynamical system (L, s, φ) is given in the next definition.

Definition 20. Let (L, s, φ) be a quantum dynamical system and P be a partition of (L, s). The logical entropy of T respect to P is defined by:

hsl(φ,P)=limn1nhsl(Vi=1nφiP)

The logical entropy of φ is defined as:

hsl(φ)=suphsl(φ,P)

where the supremum is taken over all finite partitions of (L, s).

In the following proposition some ergodic properties of h1s (φ, P) and h1s (φ) will be studied.

Proposition 21. If (L, s, φ) is a quantum dynamical system and P is a partition of (L, s), then

i)h’s (φ, P) = h’s (φ, Vk=i φ’Ρ);

ii) For k ∈ N, h’s^k) = kh’s(φ).

Proof.

hsl(φ,P)=limn1nhsl(Vi=1nφiP)

ii) Let P be an arbitrarary finite partition of (L, s). we can write

hsl(φk,i=1nφiP)=limn1nhsl(j=1n(φk)j(i=1nφiP))=limn1nhsl(j=1ni=1kφkj+iP)=limn1nhsl(i=1nk1φiP)=limnnkn1nkhsl(i=1nk1φiP)=khsl(φ,p)

Definition 22. Let (L, s, φ) be a quantum dynamical system. A finite partition R of (L, s), is said to be an s- generator ofφ, if there exists r∈ N such thatP ≾s Vri-1φiR for each finite partition P of (L, s).

The main aim of this theorem is to prove an analogue of the Kolmogorov-Sinaj theorem on logical entropy and generators.

Theorem 23. Let (L, s, φ) bea quantum dynamical system and let R be an s-generator of φ, then h1s (φ) = h1s (φ, R).

Proof. Let P be an arbitrary finite partition of (L, s). Since R is an s-generator, P ≾s Vri-1R. By Theorem 15, you get

hsl(φ,P)hsl(φ,Vi=1rR)=hsl(φ,R)Hencehsl(φ)=suphsl(φ,P)hsl(φ,R).

Hence

.On the other hand

.

6 Conclusion

This paper has introduced logical entropy and conditional logical entropy of hnite partitions on a quantum logic and has presented some of their ergodic properties. Also, logical entropy of a quantum dynamical system with hnite partitions studied and some of its properties proved.

1

1 References

1 G. Birkhoff, J. Von Neumann, Ann. Math. 37, 8 (1936)10.2307/1968621Search in Google Scholar

2 M. Khare, Sh. Roy, China. J. Theor. phys. 50, 551 (2008)10.1088/0253-6102/50/3/02Search in Google Scholar

3 M. Khare, Sh. Roy, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 47,1386 (2008)10.1007/s10773-007-9581-1Search in Google Scholar

4 H. Yuan, China. MM-Preprints 22, 409 (2003)10.1089/153685903771797156Search in Google Scholar

5 A. Ebrahimzadeh, M. Ebrahimi, JMMRC 2, 53 (2013)Search in Google Scholar

6 A. Ebrahimzadeh, M. Ebrahimi, U.P.B. Sci. Bull. Series A 76,107 (2014)Search in Google Scholar

7 D. Ellerman, Int. J. Semant. Comput. 7,121 (2013)10.1142/S1793351X13400059Search in Google Scholar

8 I. J. Good, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 77, 561 (1982)10.2307/2287710Search in Google Scholar

9 G. P. Patil, C. Taillie, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 77, 548 (1982)10.1080/01621459.1982.10477845Search in Google Scholar

10 C. R. Rao, Theor. Popul. Biol. 21, 24 (1982)10.1016/0040-5809(82)90004-1Search in Google Scholar

11 D. Ellerman, Rev. Symb. Logic. 3, 287 (2010)10.1017/S1755020310000018Search in Google Scholar

12 D. Ellerman, Theory. Synthese. 168,119 (2009)10.1007/s11229-008-9333-7Search in Google Scholar

13 P. Walters, An introduction to ergodic theory (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982) 10.1007/978-1-4612-5775-2Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-8-31
Accepted: 2015-12-8
Published Online: 2016-2-20
Published in Print: 2016-1-1

© 2016 A.Ebrahimzadeh, published by De Gruyter Open

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular articles
  2. Speeding of α Decay in Strong Laser Fields
  3. Regular articles
  4. Multi-soliton rational solutions for some nonlinear evolution equations
  5. Regular articles
  6. Thin film flow of an Oldroyd 6-constant fluid over a moving belt: an analytic approximate solution
  7. Regular articles
  8. Bilinearization and new multi-soliton solutions of mKdV hierarchy with time-dependent coefficients
  9. Regular articles
  10. Duality relation among the Hamiltonian structures of a parametric coupled Korteweg-de Vries system
  11. Regular articles
  12. Modeling the potential energy field caused by mass density distribution with Eton approach
  13. Regular articles
  14. Climate Solutions based on advanced scientific discoveries of Allatra physics
  15. Regular articles
  16. Investigation of TLD-700 energy response to low energy x-ray encountered in diagnostic radiology
  17. Regular articles
  18. Synthesis of Pt nanowires with the participation of physical vapour deposition
  19. Regular articles
  20. Quantum discord and entanglement in grover search algorithm
  21. Regular articles
  22. On order statistics from nonidentical discrete random variables
  23. Regular articles
  24. Charmed hadron photoproduction at COMPASS
  25. Regular articles
  26. Perturbation solutions for a micropolar fluid flow in a semi-infinite expanding or contracting pipe with large injection or suction through porous wall
  27. Regular articles
  28. Flap motion of helicopter rotors with novel, dynamic stall model
  29. Regular articles
  30. Impact of severe cracked germanium (111) substrate on aluminum indium gallium phosphate light-emitting-diode’s electro-optical performance
  31. Regular articles
  32. Slow-fast effect and generation mechanism of brusselator based on coordinate transformation
  33. Regular articles
  34. Space-time spectral collocation algorithm for solving time-fractional Tricomi-type equations
  35. Regular articles
  36. Recent Progress in Search for Dark Sector Signatures
  37. Regular articles
  38. Recent progress in organic spintronics
  39. Regular articles
  40. On the Construction of a Surface Family with Common Geodesic in Galilean Space G3
  41. Regular articles
  42. Self-healing phenomena of graphene: potential and applications
  43. Regular articles
  44. Viscous flow and heat transfer over an unsteady stretching surface
  45. Regular articles
  46. Spacetime Exterior to a Star: Against Asymptotic Flatness
  47. Regular articles
  48. Continuum dynamics and the electromagnetic field in the scalar ether theory of gravitation
  49. Regular articles
  50. Corrosion and mechanical properties of AM50 magnesium alloy after modified by different amounts of rare earth element Gadolinium
  51. Regular articles
  52. Genocchi Wavelet-like Operational Matrix and its Application for Solving Non-linear Fractional Differential Equations
  53. Regular articles
  54. Energy and Wave function Analysis on Harmonic Oscillator Under Simultaneous Non-Hermitian Transformations of Co-ordinate and Momentum: Iso-spectral case
  55. Regular articles
  56. Unification of all hyperbolic tangent function methods
  57. Regular articles
  58. Analytical solution for the correlator with Gribov propagators
  59. Regular articles
  60. A New Algorithm for the Approximation of the Schrödinger Equation
  61. Regular articles
  62. Analytical solutions for the fractional diffusion-advection equation describing super-diffusion
  63. Regular articles
  64. On the fractional differential equations with not instantaneous impulses
  65. Topical Issue: Uncertain Differential Equations: Theory, Methods and Applications
  66. Exact solutions of the Biswas-Milovic equation, the ZK(m,n,k) equation and the K(m,n) equation using the generalized Kudryashov method
  67. Topical Issue: Uncertain Differential Equations: Theory, Methods and Applications
  68. Numerical solution of two dimensional time fractional-order biological population model
  69. Topical Issue: Uncertain Differential Equations: Theory, Methods and Applications
  70. Rotational surfaces in isotropic spaces satisfying weingarten conditions
  71. Topical Issue: Uncertain Differential Equations: Theory, Methods and Applications
  72. Anti-synchronization of fractional order chaotic and hyperchaotic systems with fully unknown parameters using modified adaptive control
  73. Topical Issue: Uncertain Differential Equations: Theory, Methods and Applications
  74. Approximate solutions to the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation in de Sitter spacetime
  75. Topical Issue: Uncertain Differential Equations: Theory, Methods and Applications
  76. Stability and Analytic Solutions of an Optimal Control Problem on the Schrödinger Lie Group
  77. Topical Issue: Recent Developments in Applied and Engineering Mathematics
  78. Logical entropy of quantum dynamical systems
  79. Topical Issue: Recent Developments in Applied and Engineering Mathematics
  80. An efficient algorithm for solving fractional differential equations with boundary conditions
  81. Topical Issue: Recent Developments in Applied and Engineering Mathematics
  82. A numerical method for solving systems of higher order linear functional differential equations
  83. Topical Issue: Recent Developments in Applied and Engineering Mathematics
  84. Nonlinear self adjointness, conservation laws and exact solutions of ill-posed Boussinesq equation
  85. Topical Issue: Recent Developments in Applied and Engineering Mathematics
  86. On combined optical solitons of the one-dimensional Schrödinger’s equation with time dependent coefficients
  87. Topical Issue: Recent Developments in Applied and Engineering Mathematics
  88. On soliton solutions of the Wu-Zhang system
  89. Topical Issue: Recent Developments in Applied and Engineering Mathematics
  90. Comparison between the (G’/G) - expansion method and the modified extended tanh method
  91. Topical Issue: Recent Developments in Applied and Engineering Mathematics
  92. On the union of graded prime ideals
  93. Topical Issue: Recent Developments in Applied and Engineering Mathematics
  94. Oscillation criteria for nonlinear fractional differential equation with damping term
  95. Topical Issue: Recent Developments in Applied and Engineering Mathematics
  96. A new method for computing the reliability of consecutive k-out-of-n:F systems
  97. Topical Issue: Recent Developments in Applied and Engineering Mathematics
  98. A time-delay equation: well-posedness to optimal control
  99. Topical Issue: Recent Developments in Applied and Engineering Mathematics
  100. Numerical solutions of multi-order fractional differential equations by Boubaker polynomials
  101. Topical Issue: Recent Developments in Applied and Engineering Mathematics
  102. Laplace homotopy perturbation method for Burgers equation with space- and time-fractional order
  103. Topical Issue: Recent Developments in Applied and Engineering Mathematics
  104. The calculation of the optical gap energy of ZnXO (X = Bi, Sn and Fe)
  105. Special Issue: Advanced Computational Modelling of Nonlinear Physical Phenomena
  106. Analysis of time-fractional hunter-saxton equation: a model of neumatic liquid crystal
  107. Special Issue: Advanced Computational Modelling of Nonlinear Physical Phenomena
  108. A certain sequence of functions involving the Aleph function
  109. Special Issue: Advanced Computational Modelling of Nonlinear Physical Phenomena
  110. On negacyclic codes over the ring ℤp + up + . . . + uk + 1p
  111. Special Issue: Advanced Computational Modelling of Nonlinear Physical Phenomena
  112. Solitary and compacton solutions of fractional KdV-like equations
  113. Special Issue: Advanced Computational Modelling of Nonlinear Physical Phenomena
  114. Regarding on the exact solutions for the nonlinear fractional differential equations
  115. Special Issue: Advanced Computational Modelling of Nonlinear Physical Phenomena
  116. Non-local Integrals and Derivatives on Fractal Sets with Applications
  117. Special Issue: Advanced Computational Modelling of Nonlinear Physical Phenomena
  118. On the solutions of electrohydrodynamic flow with fractional differential equations by reproducing kernel method
  119. Special issue on Information Technology and Computational Physics
  120. On uninorms and nullnorms on direct product of bounded lattices
  121. Special issue on Information Technology and Computational Physics
  122. Phase-space description of the coherent state dynamics in a small one-dimensional system
  123. Special issue on Information Technology and Computational Physics
  124. Automated Program Design – an Example Solving a Weather Forecasting Problem
  125. Special issue on Information Technology and Computational Physics
  126. Stress - Strain Response of the Human Spine Intervertebral Disc As an Anisotropic Body. Mathematical Modeling and Computation
  127. Special issue on Information Technology and Computational Physics
  128. Numerical solution to the Complex 2D Helmholtz Equation based on Finite Volume Method with Impedance Boundary Conditions
  129. Special issue on Information Technology and Computational Physics
  130. Application of Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization techniques for improved image steganography systems
  131. Special issue on Information Technology and Computational Physics
  132. Intelligent Chatter Bot for Regulation Search
  133. Special issue on Information Technology and Computational Physics
  134. Modeling and optimization of Quality of Service routing in Mobile Ad hoc Networks
  135. Special issue on Information Technology and Computational Physics
  136. Resource management for server virtualization under the limitations of recovery time objective
  137. Special issue on Information Technology and Computational Physics
  138. MODY – calculation of ordered structures by symmetry-adapted functions
  139. Special issue on Information Technology and Computational Physics
  140. Survey of Object-Based Data Reduction Techniques in Observational Astronomy
  141. Special issue on Information Technology and Computational Physics
  142. Optimization of the prediction of second refined wavelet coefficients in electron structure calculations
  143. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  144. Droplet spreading and permeating on the hybrid-wettability porous substrates: a lattice Boltzmann method study
  145. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  146. POD-Galerkin Model for Incompressible Single-Phase Flow in Porous Media
  147. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  148. Effect of the Pore Size Distribution on the Displacement Efficiency of Multiphase Flow in Porous Media
  149. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  150. Numerical heat transfer analysis of transcritical hydrocarbon fuel flow in a tube partially filled with porous media
  151. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  152. Experimental Investigation on Oil Enhancement Mechanism of Hot Water Injection in tight reservoirs
  153. Special Issue on Research Frontier on Molecular Reaction Dynamics
  154. Role of intramolecular hydrogen bonding in the excited-state intramolecular double proton transfer (ESIDPT) of calix[4]arene: A TDDFT study
  155. Special Issue on Research Frontier on Molecular Reaction Dynamics
  156. Hydrogen-bonding study of photoexcited 4-nitro-1,8-naphthalimide in hydrogen-donating solvents
  157. Special Issue on Research Frontier on Molecular Reaction Dynamics
  158. The Interaction between Graphene and Oxygen Atom
  159. Special Issue on Research Frontier on Molecular Reaction Dynamics
  160. Kinetics of the austenitization in the Fe-Mo-C ternary alloys during continuous heating
  161. Special Issue: Functional Advanced and Nanomaterials
  162. Colloidal synthesis of Culn0.75Ga0.25Se2 nanoparticles and their photovoltaic performance
  163. Special Issue: Functional Advanced and Nanomaterials
  164. Positioning and aligning CNTs by external magnetic field to assist localised epoxy cure
  165. Special Issue: Functional Advanced and Nanomaterials
  166. Quasi-planar elemental clusters in pair interactions approximation
  167. Special Issue: Functional Advanced and Nanomaterials
  168. Variable Viscosity Effects on Time Dependent Magnetic Nanofluid Flow past a Stretchable Rotating Plate
Downloaded on 12.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phys-2015-0058/html
Scroll to top button