Home Mathematics Identifying quantum logics by numerical events
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Identifying quantum logics by numerical events

  • Dietmar Dorninger
Published/Copyright: January 13, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Let S be a set of states of a physical system and let p(s) be the probability of an occurrence of an event when the system is in the state sS. The function p from S to [0, 1] is called a numerical event, multidimensional probability or, alternatively, S-probability. Given a set of numerical events which has been obtained by measurements and not supposing any knowledge of the logical structure of the events that appear in the physical system, the question arises which kind of logic is inherent to the system under consideration. In particular, does one deal with a classical situation or a quantum one?

In this survey several answers are presented. Starting by associating sets of numerical events to quantum logics we study structures that arise when S-probabilities are partially ordered by the order of functions and characterize those structures which indicate that one deals with a classical system. In particular, sequences of numerical events are considered that give rise to Bell-like inequalities. At the center of all studies there are so called algebras of S-probabilities, subsets of these and their generalizations. A crucial feature of these structures is that order theoretic properties can be expressed by the addition and subtraction of real functions entailing simplified algorithmic procedures.

The study of numerical events and algebras of S-probabilities goes back to a cooperation of E. G. Beltrametti and M. J. Mączyński in 1991 and has since then resulted in a series of subsequent papers of physical interest the main results of which will be commented on and put in an appropriate context.

MSC 2010: 06C15; 03G12; 81P16
  1. Communicated by Anatolij Dvurečenskij

References

[1] Beltrametti, E. G.—Cassinelli, G.: The Logic of Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1981.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Beltrametti, E. G.—Dorninger, D.—Mączyński, M. J.: On a cryptographical characterization of classical and nonclassical event systems, Rep. Math. Phys. 60 (2007), 117–123.10.1016/S0034-4877(07)80103-0Search in Google Scholar

[3] Beltrametti, E. G.—Mączyński, M. J.: On a characterization of classical and nonclassical probabilities, J. Math. Phys. 32 (1991), 1280–1286.10.1063/1.529326Search in Google Scholar

[4] Beltrametti, E. G.—Mączyński, M. J.: On the characterization of probabilities: A generalization of Bell’s inequalities, J. Math. Phys. 34 (1993), 4919–4929.10.1063/1.530333Search in Google Scholar

[5] Dorfer, G.—Dorninger, D.—Länger, H.: On algebras of multidimensional probabilities, Math. Slovaca 60 (2010), 571–582.10.2478/s12175-010-0032-8Search in Google Scholar

[6] Dorfer, G.—Dorninger, D.—Länger, H.: On the structure of numerical event spaces, Kybernetika 46 (2010), 971–981.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Dorninger, D.: On the structure of generalized fields of events, Contr. General Algebra 20 (2012), 29–34.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Dorninger, D.—Länger, H.: On a characterization of physical systems by spaces of numerical events, ARGESIM Report 35 (2009), 601–607.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Dorninger, D.—Länger, H.: Testing for classicality of a physical system, Intern. J. Theor. Phys. 52 (2013), 1141–1147.10.1007/s10773-012-1429-7Search in Google Scholar

[10] Dorninger, D.—Länger, H.: Probability measurements characterizing the classicality of a physical system, Rep. Math. Phys. 73 (2014), 127–135.10.1016/S0034-4877(14)60036-7Search in Google Scholar

[11] Dorninger, D.—Länger, H.: On bounded posets arising from quantum mechanical measurements, Intern. J. Theor. Phys. 55 (2016), 4453–4461.10.1007/s10773-016-3068-xSearch in Google Scholar

[12] Dorninger, D.—Länger, H.: Structural properties of algebras of S-probabilities, Math. Slovaca 68 (2018), 485–490.10.1515/ms-2017-0118Search in Google Scholar

[13] Dorninger, D.—Länger, H.: Quantum measurements generating structures of numerical events, JAMP 6 (2018), 982–996.10.4236/jamp.2018.65085Search in Google Scholar

[14] Dorninger, D.—Länger, H.: Quantum logics defined by sets of numerical events, Rep. Math. Phys. 83 (2019), 243–251.10.1016/S0034-4877(19)30041-2Search in Google Scholar

[15] Godowski, R. M.: Commutativity in orthomodular posets, Rep. Math. Phys. 18 (1980), 347–351.10.1016/0034-4877(80)90095-6Search in Google Scholar

[16] Klukowski, J.: On the representation of Boolean orthomodular partially ordered sets, Demonstratio Math. 8 (1975), 405–423.10.1515/dema-1975-0404Search in Google Scholar

[17] Mackey, G. W.: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Dover Publ., Mineola, NY, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Mączyński, M. J.—Traczyk, T.: A characterization of orthomodular partially ordered sets admitting a full set of states, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Sér. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys. 21 (1973), 3–8.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Navara, M.—Pták, P.: Almost Boolean orthomodular posets, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 60 (1989), 105–111.10.1016/0022-4049(89)90108-4Search in Google Scholar

[20] Pitowsky, I.: Quantum Probability-Quantum Logic. Lecture Notes in Phys. 321, Springer, Berlin, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Pták, P.: Concrete quantum logics, Intern. J. Theor. Phys. 39 (2000), 827–837.10.1023/A:1003626929648Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-11-22
Accepted: 2019-07-05
Published Online: 2020-01-13
Published in Print: 2020-02-25

© 2020 Mathematical Institute Slovak Academy of Sciences

Downloaded on 15.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ms-2017-0329/html
Scroll to top button