Home Derivative and higher-order Cauchy integral formula of matrix functions
Article Open Access

Derivative and higher-order Cauchy integral formula of matrix functions

  • Xiaojie Huang EMAIL logo , Zhixiu Liu and Chun Wu
Published/Copyright: December 31, 2021

Abstract

The derivative of a n -order matrix function on the complex field is usually defined as a n 2 -order matrix, which is not suitable for generalizing Cauchy integral formula of matrix functions to its higher-order derivative form. In this paper, a new kind of derivative of matrix functions is defined, and the higher-order derivative form of Cauchy integral formula of matrix functions is also proved to be true under the new kind of definition of derivative. At the same time, some examples about calculating the values of matrix functions by using Cauchy integral formula of matrix functions and its higher-order derivative form are given.

MSC 2010: 15A16; 15A15

1 Introduction and questions

Let C denote the complex field and C n × n denote the matrix ring on C . If f ( z ) is a polynomial function on C and A is a n -order matrix in C n × n , then the meaning of matrix function f : A C n × n f ( A ) C n × n , abbreviated as f ( A ) , is obvious, that is a polynomial whose variable is the matrix A (see [1]). However, for more general function f ( z ) , the meaning of the corresponding matrix function f ( A ) is not so obvious, and how to define it reasonably is an important problem. In fact, not only matrix ring C n × n but also the general Banach algebra on complex field C has the problem about reasonable definition of function f ( A ) . Whether matrix rings or more general Banach algebras, there is always a good scheme to the definition of f ( A ) for analytical function f ( z ) on complex field C . If f ( z ) is an analytic function on complex field C , then it can be expanded by power series f ( z ) = k = 0 k = z k , and naturally, the f ( A ) is defined as f ( A ) k = 0 k = A k (see [1,2]).

Although the aforementioned definition of f ( A ) is intuitive, it has some inconveniences. For example, even for matrix A in matrix ring C n × n , not to mention the element in general Banach algebra on C , it is difficult to calculate the value of f ( A ) . Fortunately, on the basis of annihilation polynomial of matrix and Lagrange-Sylvester theorem, we can give the polynomial matrix function equivalent to f ( A ) , which is convenient to calculate the value of f ( A ) (see [1]).

Is there any other equivalent definition of the matrix functions corresponding to analytic functions on the complex field C ? This is a natural problem because the analytic functions have many different equivalent definitions and representations. In fact, in addition to the power series representation, the analytical function f ( z ) on C has many other important characteristics, and it even could be expressed by G derivative only according to the function values on a sequence of points with at least one aggregation point (see [3]), which is a profound supplement to the uniqueness theorem of analytic functions. Of course, analytical function f ( z ) can also be expressed by the function values on a curve, that is the following famous Cauchy integral formula (see [4]).

Theorem 1.1

Let D be the interior domain of rectifiable curve L in C , f ( z ) be an analytical function on D and continuous on closed region D ¯ , then for any z D ,

f ( z ) = 1 2 π i L f ( ξ ) ξ z d ξ .

On complex field C , is there representation of Cauchy integral formula for the function f ( A ) in matrix rings or more general Banach algebras? The answer is affirmative, we have the similar Cauchy integral formula for f ( A ) (see [2]), and more details are in the second part of the paper. In order to be more specific and more relevant with the paper’s topic, we only discuss the matrix function f ( A ) in C n × n . The discussion on Banach algebras may be another topic to be studied.

Furthermore, the Cauchy integral formula of analytical functions has the form of higher-order derivative as follows (see [4]).

Theorem 1.2

Let D be the interior domain of rectifiable curve L in C , f ( z ) be an analytical function on D and continuous on closed region D ¯ , then for any z D ,

f ( α ) ( z ) = α ! 2 π i L f ( ξ ) ( ξ z ) α + 1 d ξ ,

where α is a positive integer, f ( α ) ( z ) is the α th order derivative of f ( z ) .

So do the matrix functions have the corresponding higher-order derivative form? The first problem it has to deal with is how to define the derivative of matrix functions. According to the usual definition, the derivative of

f : A = { A k l } k , l = 1 n C n × n f ( A ) = { f ( A ) s t } s , t = 1 n C n × n ,

where A k l and f ( A ) s t are the elements of matrix A and f ( A ) , respectively, k , l , s , and t are positive integers, is

f ( A ) = d f ( A ) d A = d f ( A ) d A k l k , l = 1 n ,

which is a n 2 -order matrix, where d f ( A ) d A k l = d f ( A ) s t d A k l s , t = 1 n (see [5]). However, the corresponding integral representation

f ( A ) = d f ( A ) d A = 1 2 π i L f ( ξ ) ( ξ I A ) 2 d ξ

is a matrix of n -order (if so more details are in the second part of the paper). The aforementioned two matrices are obviously not equivalent. In order to let the matrix functions have Cauchy integral formula in the form of corresponding higher-order derivative, another new and appropriate definition of derivative of matrix functions must be given.

2 Definitions and main results

The square matrix function f ( A ) is defined as follows.

Definition 2.1

[1] Let f ( z ) = k = 0 a k z k be an analytic function on domain D = { z : z < R } in C , A be a n -order matrix in C n × n , the matrix spectral norm is denoted as A and A < R and then the matrix series k = 0 a k A k converges and be called the matrix function f ( A ) , that is, f ( A ) k = 0 a k A k .

When f ( z ) is analytic in C , the A < + ( = R ) always holds, which means that f ( A ) is always reasonable. As previously mentioned, in order to extend the Cauchy integral formula to the form of higher-order derivative, we need the concept of derivative of matrix functions and define it as follows.

Definition 2.2

Let f ( z ) be an analytic function on domain D = { z : z < R } , A be a n -order matrix with spectral norm A < R , f ( A ) be the corresponding matrix function, the derivative of order α of f ( z ) is f ( α ) ( z ) and then the matrix function determined by f ( α ) ( z ) is denoted as f ( α ) ( A ) and called the derivative of order α of f ( A ) , where α is a positive integer.

Before stating Cauchy integral formula and its higher-order derivative form of matrix functions, it needs the definition of integral on a curve L in C of matrix valued functions with complex variable. The following definition does not depend on measure (see [6]), but only on algebraic operation, which is similar to Riemann integral (see [5]).

Definition 2.3

Let A ( z ) : z D A ( z ) C n × n , abbreviated as A ( z ) , be a matrix valued function with complex variable, where D is a domain in C . The rectifiable curve L is contained in the domain D , Δ = { z 0 (beginning point), z 1 , z 2 , , z m ( ending point ) } denotes the partition of the curve L , that is, L = i = 0 i = m 1 z i z i + 1 ^ . ξ i is an arbitrary given point on arc z i z i + 1 ^ , Δ max 1 i m 1 { z i + 1 z i } , if the limit lim Δ 0 i = 0 m 1 A ( ξ i ) ( z i + 1 z i ) exists, it is defined as the integral of matrix valued function A ( z ) on the curve L and denoted as L A ( z ) d z .

The Cauchy integral formula of matrix function f ( A ) can be obtained as follows.

Theorem 2.4

[1] Let A be a n -order matrix in C n × n and A be the matrix spectral norm. The function f ( z ) used to define the matrix function f ( A ) is an analytic function on C . L is a circle centered at the origin of C with the radius r > A , then

f ( A ) = 1 2 π i L f ( ξ ) ξ I A d ξ .

Based on the aforementioned definition of derivative of matrix functions, we can extend the Cauchy integral formula of matrix functions to the form of higher-order derivative.

Theorem 2.5

Let A be a n -order matrix in C n × n and A be the matrix spectral norm. The function f ( z ) used to define the matrix function f ( A ) is an analytic function on C . L is a circle centered at the origin of C with the radius r > A , then

f ( α ) ( A ) = α ! 2 π i L f ( ξ ) ( ξ I A ) ( α + 1 ) d ξ ,

where α is a positive integer and f ( α ) ( A ) is the α th order derivative of f ( A ) .

Denote A ( z ) as { a k l ( z ) } k , l = 1 n , then L A ( z ) d z can be denoted as L a k l ( z ) d z k , l = 1 n . This kind of expression sometimes can be convenient. For this purpose, we synthesize Theorems 2.4 and 2.5 and rewrite them as follows.

Theorem 2.6

Let A = { a k l } k , l = 1 n be a n -order matrix in C n × n and A be the matrix spectral norm. The function f ( z ) used to define the matrix function f ( A ) is an analytic function on C . L is a circle centered at the origin of C with the radius r > A , and then, ( ξ I A ) ( α + 1 ) may be represented with { b k l ( ξ ) } k , l = 1 n and

f ( α ) ( A ) = α ! 2 π i L f ( ξ ) b k l ( ξ ) d ξ k , l = 1 n ,

where α is a nonnegative integer and f ( α ) ( A ) is the α th order derivative of f ( A ) and f ( 0 ) ( A ) f ( A ) , 0 ! 1 .

Remark 2.7

The calculation of ( ξ I A ) ( α + 1 ) = { b k l ( ξ ) } k , l = 1 n can be done by elementary transformation (see [7]), which is the key to the application of Theorem 2.6. The integral L f ( ξ ) b k l ( ξ ) d ξ can be calculated by residue theorem of complex variable functions (see [4]). Calculation examples are in the fourth part of the paper.

3 Proof of the main results

In order to prove Theorem 2.5, we first present the following lemmas. For convenience, we omit the superscript and subscript of curly brackets representing the matrix below.

Lemma 3.1

[4] Let f ( z ) be an analytic function on circle domain D = { z : z a < R } in C , then f ( z ) = k = 0 f ( k ) ( a ) k ! ( z a ) k , z D .

Lemma 3.2

Let L be a rectifiable curve and f ( z ) be a continuous function on the curve L , A = { a k l } C n × n , then L f ( z ) d z A m = L f ( z ) A m d z , where m is a nonnegative integer and A 0 I is an identity matrix.

Proof

Note that L f ( z ) d z exists, denote A m = { a k l ( m ) } , then

L f ( z ) d z A m = L f ( z ) d z a k l ( m ) = L f ( z ) a k l ( m ) d z = L { f ( z ) a k l ( m ) } d z = L f ( z ) { a k l ( m ) } d z = L f ( z ) A m d z .

Lemma 3.3

[4] Let L be a rectifiable curve and f k ( z ) be continuous functions on the curve L , where k is a positive integer. If series k = 1 f k ( z ) uniformly converges to function f ( z ) on L , then L f ( z ) d z = k = 1 L f k ( z ) d z .

Lemma 3.4

Let A m ( z ) and A ( z ) be n -order matrix valued functions with complex variable, where m is a positive integer, L be a rectifiable curve in C . In the sense of matrix norm, A m ( z ) is continuous on L and series m = 1 A m ( z ) uniformly converges to function A ( z ) on L , then

L A ( z ) d z = m = 1 L A m ( z ) d z .

Proof

Denote m = 1 d A m ( z ) = m = 1 d { a k l ( m ) ( z ) } , A ( z ) = { a k l ( z ) } , series m = 1 A m ( z ) converges uniformly to function A ( z ) on L , then for any given ε > 0 , exists N > 0 , if d > N , for arbitrary z L ,

m = 1 d A m ( z ) A ( z ) = k , l = 1 n m = 1 d a k l ( m ) ( z ) a k l ( z ) 2 1 2 < ε ,

and then, the series m = 1 a k l ( m ) ( z ) converges uniformly to a k l ( z ) .

By Lemma 3.3, we have L a k l ( z ) d z = m = 1 L a k l ( m ) ( z ) d z , then,

m = 1 L A m ( z ) d z = m = 1 L a k l ( m ) ( z ) d z = m = 1 L a k l ( m ) ( z ) d z = L a k l ( z ) d z = L A ( z ) d z .

Although the proof is based on 2-norm, it is not without generality according to the equivalence of norms. The result still holds for the other norm, e.g., spectral norm.□

Lemma 3.5

[7] Let A be n -order matrix in C n × n and A be matrix spectral norm and A < 1 , then

( I + A ) α = k = 0 α k A k ,

where α is an integer, k is a positive integer and α k = α ( α 1 ) ( α k + 1 ) k ! .

Now we turn to the proof of Theorem 2.5.

Proof

As f ( z ) is analytical in the whole complex field C , by Lemma 3.1,

f ( z ) = k = 0 f ( k ) ( 0 ) k ! z k , f ( α ) ( z ) = k = α f ( k ) ( 0 ) ( k α ) ! z k α ,

according to Definition 2.2,

f ( α ) ( A ) = k = α f ( k ) ( 0 ) ( k α ) ! A k α .

As a result of Theorem 1.2,

f ( k ) ( 0 ) = k ! 2 π i L f ( ξ ) ξ k + 1 d ξ ,

then

f ( α ) ( A ) = k = α 1 ( k α ) ! k ! 2 π i L f ( ξ ) ξ k + 1 d ξ A k α .

By Lemma 3.2, we have

f ( α ) ( A ) = k = α L 1 ( k α ) ! k ! 2 π i f ( ξ ) ξ k + 1 d ξ A k α = k = α L f ( ξ ) k ! ( k α ) ! 1 2 π i A k α ξ k + 1 d ξ .

On the other hand, since ( c z ) n = c n z n , by Definition 2.1, ( c A ) n = c n A n . Let the radius of L be large enough such that A ξ < 1 when ξ L , and according to Lemma 3.5,

( ξ I A ) ( α + 1 ) = ξ ( α + 1 ) I A ξ ( α + 1 ) = ξ ( α + 1 ) k = 0 ( α + 1 ) k A ξ k = ξ ( α + 1 ) k = 0 ( α + 1 ) ( α + 2 ) ( α + k ) k ! A ξ k = k = 0 ( α + k ) ! k ! α ! A k ξ α + k + 1 .

So we have

k = α f ( ξ ) k ! ( k α ) ! 1 2 π i A k α ξ k + 1 = α ! 2 π i f ( ξ ) k = α k ! ( k α ) ! α ! A k α ξ k + 1 = α ! 2 π i f ( ξ ) k = 0 ( α + k ) ! k ! α ! A k ξ α + k + 1 = α ! 2 π i f ( ξ ) ( ξ I A ) ( α + 1 ) .

By Lemma 3.4,

f ( α ) ( A ) = k = α L f ( ξ ) k ! ( k α ) ! 1 2 π i A k α ξ k + 1 d ξ = L k = α f ( ξ ) k ! ( k α ) ! 1 2 π i A k α ξ k + 1 d ξ = α ! 2 π i L f ( ξ ) ( ξ I A ) ( α + 1 ) d ξ .

4 Examples of application

Example 4.1

If A = { a k l } C n × n , p ( z ) = z I A , then p ( A ) = O .

Proof

Note that { b k l ( ξ ) } ( ξ I A ) 1 = M k l ( ξ ) ξ I A , where M k l ( ξ ) is an algebraic cofactor, which is a polynomial of ξ . By residue theorem or Cauchy integral theorem (see [4]), we have

L M k l ( ξ ) d ξ = 0 .

By Theorem 2.6 and p ( ξ ) = ξ I A ,

p ( A ) = 1 2 π i L p ( ξ ) M k l ( ξ ) ξ I A d ξ = 1 2 π i L M k l ( ξ ) d ξ = { 0 } = O .

Remark 4.2

Example 4.1 is the proof of Hamilton-Cayley theorem on the complex field (see [8]).

Example 4.3

Let A = 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 , calculate 2 A sin ( A ) + A 2 cos ( A ) .

Proof

By using elementary transformation, we can get

{ b k l ( ξ ) } ( ξ I A ) 1 = 1 ξ + 1 1 ( ξ + 1 ) ( ξ + 2 ) 0 0 1 ξ + 2 0 0 0 1 ξ + 3 ,

then

{ b ¯ i j ( ξ ) } ( ξ I A ) 2 = ( ( ξ I A ) 1 ) 2 = 1 ( ξ + 1 ) 2 2 ξ + 3 ( ξ + 1 ) 2 ( ξ + 2 ) 2 0 0 1 ( ξ + 2 ) 2 0 0 0 1 ( ξ + 3 ) 2 .

Note that [ z 2 sin ( z ) ] = 2 z sin ( z ) + z 2 cos ( z ) , by Theorem 2.6, then

2 A sin ( A ) + A 2 cos ( A ) = [ A 2 sin ( A ) ] = 1 2 π i L ( ξ 2 ) sin ( ξ ) b ¯ i j ( ξ ) d ξ = 1 2 π i L ξ 2 sin ( ξ ) ( ξ + 1 ) 2 d ξ 1 2 π i L ξ 2 sin ( ξ ) ( 2 ξ + 3 ) ( ξ + 1 ) 2 ( ξ + 2 ) 2 d ξ 0 0 1 2 π i L ξ 2 sin ( ξ ) ( ξ + 2 ) 2 d ξ 0 0 0 1 2 π i L ξ 2 sin ( ξ ) ( ξ + 3 ) 2 d ξ .

By using the residue theorem to calculate all the aforementioned integrals,

2 A sin ( A ) + A 2 cos ( A ) = 2 sin ( 1 ) + cos ( 1 ) 2 sin ( 1 ) + cos ( 1 ) 4 sin ( 2 ) 4 cos ( 2 ) 0 0 4 sin ( 2 ) + 4 cos ( 2 ) 0 0 0 6 sin ( 3 ) + 9 cos ( 3 ) .

Example 4.4

Let A = 3 1 2 2 and t be a real number, calculate exp ( A t ) .

Proof

By using elementary transformation, we can get

{ b i j ( ξ , t ) } ( ξ I A t ) 1 = ξ + 2 t ( ξ + 4 t ) ( ξ + t ) t ( ξ + 4 t ) ( ξ + t ) 2 t ( ξ + 4 t ) ( ξ + t ) ξ + 3 t ( ξ + 4 t ) ( ξ + t ) ,

and then,

{ b ¯ i j ( ξ , t ) } ( ξ I A ) 2 = ( ξ + 2 t ) 2 + 2 t 2 ( ξ + 4 t ) 2 ( ξ + t ) 2 ( ξ + 2 t ) t + t ( ξ + 3 t ) ( ξ + 4 t ) 2 ( ξ + t ) 2 2 t ( ξ + 2 t ) + 2 t ( ξ + 3 t ) ( ξ + 4 t ) 2 ( ξ + t ) 2 2 t 2 + ( ξ + 3 t ) 2 ( ξ + 4 t ) 2 ( ξ + t ) 2 .

Let f ( z ) = exp ( z ) , which is identical to its derivative. By Theorem 2.6,

exp ( A t ) = f ( A t ) = 1 2 π i L exp ( ξ ) b i j ( ξ , t ) d ξ = 1 2 π i L exp ( ξ ) ( ξ + 2 t ) ( ξ + 4 t ) ( ξ + t ) d ξ 1 2 π i L exp ( ξ ) t ( ξ + 4 t ) ( ξ + t ) d ξ 1 2 π i L exp ( ξ ) 2 t ( ξ + 4 t ) ( ξ + t ) d ξ 1 2 π i L exp ( ξ ) ( ξ + 3 t ) ( ξ + 4 t ) ( ξ + t ) d ξ ,

and at the same time,

exp ( A t ) = f ( A t ) = 1 2 π i L exp ( ξ ) b ¯ i j ( ξ , t ) d ξ = 1 2 π i L exp ( ξ ) ( ξ + 2 t ) 2 + 2 t 2 ( ξ + 4 t ) 2 ( ξ + t ) 2 d ξ 1 2 π i L exp ( ξ ) ( ξ + 2 t ) t + t ( ξ + 3 t ) ( ξ + 4 t ) 2 ( ξ + t ) 2 d ξ 1 2 π i L exp ( ξ ) 2 t ( ξ + 2 t ) + 2 t ( ξ + 3 t ) ( ξ + 4 t ) 2 ( ξ + t ) 2 d ξ 1 2 π i L exp ( ξ ) 2 t 2 + ( ξ + 3 t ) 2 ( ξ + 4 t ) 2 ( ξ + t ) 2 d ξ .

By using the residue theorem to calculate all the aforementioned integrals,

exp ( A t ) = f ( A t ) = f ( A t ) = exp ( t ) + 2 exp ( 4 t ) 3 exp ( t ) exp ( 4 t ) 3 2 exp ( t ) + 4 exp ( 4 t ) 3 2 exp ( t ) + exp ( 4 t ) 3 .

Remark 4.5

It is sometimes more convenient to calculate the value of matrix function by Theorem 2.6 and residue theorem than by the annihilation polynomial of matrix and Lagrange-Sylvester theorem.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by Science and Technology Project of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education (Nos. GJJ180944 and GJJ190963) and Chongqing Natural Science Foundation Project (No. cstc2019jcyj-msxmX0390).

  1. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] N. J. Higham, Functions of Matrices: Theory and Computation, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2008. 10.1137/1.9780898717778Search in Google Scholar

[2] W. Rudin, Functional Analysis, 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1973. Search in Google Scholar

[3] X. J. Huang, Z. X. Liu, and Y. T. Li, Privarov’s problem about the uniqueness of holomorphic functions, Pure Appl. Math. 36 (2020), no. 4, 482–487, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-5513.2020.04.011. (in Chinese) Search in Google Scholar

[4] J. B. Conway, Functions of One Complex Variable I, 2nd edn, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1978. 10.1007/978-1-4612-6313-5Search in Google Scholar

[5] V. A. Zorich, Mathematical Analysis, 4th edn, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2004. Search in Google Scholar

[6] P. R. Halmos, Measure Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1974. Search in Google Scholar

[7] X. K. Zhang and P. H. Xu, Higher Algebra, 2nd edn, Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, 2008. (in Chinese) Search in Google Scholar

[8] C. A. McCarthy, The Cayley-Hamilton theorem, Amer. Math. Monthly 82 (1975), no. 4, 390–391, https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1975.11993841. 10.1080/00029890.1975.11993841Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-09-17
Revised: 2021-12-07
Accepted: 2021-12-08
Published Online: 2021-12-31

© 2021 Xiaojie Huang et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Sharp conditions for the convergence of greedy expansions with prescribed coefficients
  3. Range-kernel weak orthogonality of some elementary operators
  4. Stability analysis for Selkov-Schnakenberg reaction-diffusion system
  5. On non-normal cyclic subgroups of prime order or order 4 of finite groups
  6. Some results on semigroups of transformations with restricted range
  7. Quasi-ideal Ehresmann transversals: The spined product structure
  8. On the regulator problem for linear systems over rings and algebras
  9. Solvability of the abstract evolution equations in Ls-spaces with critical temporal weights
  10. Resolving resolution dimensions in triangulated categories
  11. Entire functions that share two pairs of small functions
  12. On stochastic inverse problem of construction of stable program motion
  13. Pentagonal quasigroups, their translatability and parastrophes
  14. Counting certain quadratic partitions of zero modulo a prime number
  15. Global attractors for a class of semilinear degenerate parabolic equations
  16. A new implicit symmetric method of sixth algebraic order with vanished phase-lag and its first derivative for solving Schrödinger's equation
  17. On sub-class sizes of mutually permutable products
  18. Asymptotic solution of the Cauchy problem for the singularly perturbed partial integro-differential equation with rapidly oscillating coefficients and with rapidly oscillating heterogeneity
  19. Existence and asymptotical behavior of solutions for a quasilinear Choquard equation with singularity
  20. On kernels by rainbow paths in arc-coloured digraphs
  21. Fully degenerate Bell polynomials associated with degenerate Poisson random variables
  22. Multiple solutions and ground state solutions for a class of generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation
  23. A note on maximal operators related to Laplace-Bessel differential operators on variable exponent Lebesgue spaces
  24. Weak and strong estimates for linear and multilinear fractional Hausdorff operators on the Heisenberg group
  25. Partial sums and inclusion relations for analytic functions involving (p, q)-differential operator
  26. Hodge-Deligne polynomials of character varieties of free abelian groups
  27. Diophantine approximation with one prime, two squares of primes and one kth power of a prime
  28. The equivalent parameter conditions for constructing multiple integral half-discrete Hilbert-type inequalities with a class of nonhomogeneous kernels and their applications
  29. Boundedness of vector-valued sublinear operators on weighted Herz-Morrey spaces with variable exponents
  30. On some new quantum midpoint-type inequalities for twice quantum differentiable convex functions
  31. Quantum Ostrowski-type inequalities for twice quantum differentiable functions in quantum calculus
  32. Asymptotic measure-expansiveness for generic diffeomorphisms
  33. Infinitesimals via Cauchy sequences: Refining the classical equivalence
  34. The (1, 2)-step competition graph of a hypertournament
  35. Properties of multiplication operators on the space of functions of bounded φ-variation
  36. Disproving a conjecture of Thornton on Bohemian matrices
  37. Some estimates for the commutators of multilinear maximal function on Morrey-type space
  38. Inviscid, zero Froude number limit of the viscous shallow water system
  39. Inequalities between height and deviation of polynomials
  40. New criteria-based ℋ-tensors for identifying the positive definiteness of multivariate homogeneous forms
  41. Determinantal inequalities of Hua-Marcus-Zhang type for quaternion matrices
  42. On a new generalization of some Hilbert-type inequalities
  43. On split quaternion equivalents for Quaternaccis, shortly Split Quaternaccis
  44. On split regular BiHom-Poisson color algebras
  45. Asymptotic stability of the time-changed stochastic delay differential equations with Markovian switching
  46. The mixed metric dimension of flower snarks and wheels
  47. Oscillatory bifurcation problems for ODEs with logarithmic nonlinearity
  48. The B-topology on S-doubly quasicontinuous posets
  49. Hyers-Ulam stability of isometries on bounded domains
  50. Inhomogeneous conformable abstract Cauchy problem
  51. Path homology theory of edge-colored graphs
  52. Refinements of quantum Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities
  53. Symmetric graphs of valency seven and their basic normal quotient graphs
  54. Mean oscillation and boundedness of multilinear operator related to multiplier operator
  55. Numerical methods for time-fractional convection-diffusion problems with high-order accuracy
  56. Several explicit formulas for (degenerate) Narumi and Cauchy polynomials and numbers
  57. Finite groups whose intersection power graphs are toroidal and projective-planar
  58. On primitive solutions of the Diophantine equation x2 + y2 = M
  59. A note on polyexponential and unipoly Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind
  60. On the type 2 poly-Bernoulli polynomials associated with umbral calculus
  61. Some estimates for commutators of Littlewood-Paley g-functions
  62. Construction of a family of non-stationary combined ternary subdivision schemes reproducing exponential polynomials
  63. On the evolutionary bifurcation curves for the one-dimensional prescribed mean curvature equation with logistic type
  64. On intersections of two non-incident subgroups of finite p-groups
  65. Global existence and boundedness in a two-species chemotaxis system with nonlinear diffusion
  66. Finite groups with 4p2q elements of maximal order
  67. Positive solutions of a discrete nonlinear third-order three-point eigenvalue problem with sign-changing Green's function
  68. Power moments of automorphic L-functions related to Maass forms for SL3(ℤ)
  69. Entire solutions for several general quadratic trinomial differential difference equations
  70. Strong consistency of regression function estimator with martingale difference errors
  71. Fractional Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for interval-valued co-ordinated convex functions
  72. Montgomery identity and Ostrowski-type inequalities via quantum calculus
  73. Universal inequalities of the poly-drifting Laplacian on smooth metric measure spaces
  74. On reducible non-Weierstrass semigroups
  75. so-metrizable spaces and images of metric spaces
  76. Some new parameterized inequalities for co-ordinated convex functions involving generalized fractional integrals
  77. The concept of cone b-Banach space and fixed point theorems
  78. Complete consistency for the estimator of nonparametric regression model based on m-END errors
  79. A posteriori error estimates based on superconvergence of FEM for fractional evolution equations
  80. Solution of integral equations via coupled fixed point theorems in 𝔉-complete metric spaces
  81. Symmetric pairs and pseudosymmetry of Θ-Yetter-Drinfeld categories for Hom-Hopf algebras
  82. A new characterization of the automorphism groups of Mathieu groups
  83. The role of w-tilting modules in relative Gorenstein (co)homology
  84. Primitive and decomposable elements in homology of ΩΣℂP
  85. The G-sequence shadowing property and G-equicontinuity of the inverse limit spaces under group action
  86. Classification of f-biharmonic submanifolds in Lorentz space forms
  87. Some new results on the weaving of K-g-frames in Hilbert spaces
  88. Matrix representation of a cross product and related curl-based differential operators in all space dimensions
  89. Global optimization and applications to a variational inequality problem
  90. Functional equations related to higher derivations in semiprime rings
  91. A partial order on transformation semigroups with restricted range that preserve double direction equivalence
  92. On multi-step methods for singular fractional q-integro-differential equations
  93. Compact perturbations of operators with property (t)
  94. Entire solutions for several complex partial differential-difference equations of Fermat type in ℂ2
  95. Random attractors for stochastic plate equations with memory in unbounded domains
  96. On the convergence of two-step modulus-based matrix splitting iteration method
  97. On the separation method in stochastic reconstruction problem
  98. Robust estimation for partial functional linear regression models based on FPCA and weighted composite quantile regression
  99. Structure of coincidence isometry groups
  100. Sharp function estimates and boundedness for Toeplitz-type operators associated with general fractional integral operators
  101. Oscillatory hyper-Hilbert transform on Wiener amalgam spaces
  102. Euler-type sums involving multiple harmonic sums and binomial coefficients
  103. Poly-falling factorial sequences and poly-rising factorial sequences
  104. Geometric approximations to transition densities of Jump-type Markov processes
  105. Multiple solutions for a quasilinear Choquard equation with critical nonlinearity
  106. Bifurcations and exact traveling wave solutions for the regularized Schamel equation
  107. Almost factorizable weakly type B semigroups
  108. The finite spectrum of Sturm-Liouville problems with n transmission conditions and quadratic eigenparameter-dependent boundary conditions
  109. Ground state sign-changing solutions for a class of quasilinear Schrödinger equations
  110. Epi-quasi normality
  111. Derivative and higher-order Cauchy integral formula of matrix functions
  112. Commutators of multilinear strongly singular integrals on nonhomogeneous metric measure spaces
  113. Solutions to a multi-phase model of sea ice growth
  114. Existence and simulation of positive solutions for m-point fractional differential equations with derivative terms
  115. Bernstein-Walsh type inequalities for derivatives of algebraic polynomials in quasidisks
  116. Review Article
  117. Semiprimeness of semigroup algebras
  118. Special Issue on Problems, Methods and Applications of Nonlinear Analysis (Part II)
  119. Third-order differential equations with three-point boundary conditions
  120. Fractional calculus, zeta functions and Shannon entropy
  121. Uniqueness of positive solutions for boundary value problems associated with indefinite ϕ-Laplacian-type equations
  122. Synchronization of Caputo fractional neural networks with bounded time variable delays
  123. On quasilinear elliptic problems with finite or infinite potential wells
  124. Deterministic and random approximation by the combination of algebraic polynomials and trigonometric polynomials
  125. On a fractional Schrödinger-Poisson system with strong singularity
  126. Parabolic inequalities in Orlicz spaces with data in L1
  127. Special Issue on Evolution Equations, Theory and Applications (Part II)
  128. Impulsive Caputo-Fabrizio fractional differential equations in b-metric spaces
  129. Existence of a solution of Hilfer fractional hybrid problems via new Krasnoselskii-type fixed point theorems
  130. On a nonlinear system of Riemann-Liouville fractional differential equations with semi-coupled integro-multipoint boundary conditions
  131. Blow-up results of the positive solution for a class of degenerate parabolic equations
  132. Long time decay for 3D Navier-Stokes equations in Fourier-Lei-Lin spaces
  133. On the extinction problem for a p-Laplacian equation with a nonlinear gradient source
  134. General decay rate for a viscoelastic wave equation with distributed delay and Balakrishnan-Taylor damping
  135. On hyponormality on a weighted annulus
  136. Exponential stability of Timoshenko system in thermoelasticity of second sound with a memory and distributed delay term
  137. Convergence results on Picard-Krasnoselskii hybrid iterative process in CAT(0) spaces
  138. Special Issue on Boundary Value Problems and their Applications on Biosciences and Engineering (Part I)
  139. Marangoni convection in layers of water-based nanofluids under the effect of rotation
  140. A transient analysis to the M(τ)/M(τ)/k queue with time-dependent parameters
  141. Existence of random attractors and the upper semicontinuity for small random perturbations of 2D Navier-Stokes equations with linear damping
  142. Degenerate binomial and Poisson random variables associated with degenerate Lah-Bell polynomials
  143. Special Issue on Fractional Problems with Variable-Order or Variable Exponents (Part I)
  144. On the mixed fractional quantum and Hadamard derivatives for impulsive boundary value problems
  145. The Lp dual Minkowski problem about 0 < p < 1 and q > 0
Downloaded on 12.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2021-0135/html
Scroll to top button