Home Poly-falling factorial sequences and poly-rising factorial sequences
Article Open Access

Poly-falling factorial sequences and poly-rising factorial sequences

  • Hye Kyung Kim EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 31, 2021

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce generalizations of rising factorials and falling factorials, respectively, and study their relations with the well-known Stirling numbers, Lah numbers, and so on. The first stage is to define poly-falling factorial sequences in terms of the polyexponential functions, reducing them to falling factorials if k = 1 , necessitating a demonstration of the relations: between poly-falling factorial sequences and the Stirling numbers of the first and second kind, respectively; between poly-falling factorial sequences and the poly-Bell polynomials; between poly-falling factorial sequences and the poly-Bernoulli numbers; between poly-falling factorial sequences and poly-Genocchi numbers; and recurrence formula of these sequences. The later part of the paper deals with poly-rising factorial sequences in terms of the polyexponential functions, reducing them to rising factorial if k = 1 . We study some relations: between poly-falling factorial sequences and poly-rising factorial sequences; between poly-rising factorial sequences and the Stirling numbers of the first kind and the power of x ; and between poly-rising factorial sequences and Lah numbers and the poly-falling factorial sequences. We also derive recurrence formula of these sequences and reciprocal formula of the poly-falling factorial sequences.

MSC 2010: 11B73; 11B83; 05A19

1 Introduction

In the study of falling factorials and rising factorials, the following properties produce important characteristics for special numbers such as Stirling numbers and Lah numbers: the nth falling factorial of x is expressed in terms of the Stirling numbers of the first kind and the power of x ; the nth power of x is expressed in terms of the Stirling numbers of the second kind S 2 ( n , l ) ; the falling factorials of x ; the nth rising factorial of x is expressed in terms of Lah numbers and falling factorials; and the nth falling factorial of x can also be expressed in terms of Lah numbers and rising factorials [1,2, 3,4,5, 6,7,8, 9,10]. Kim and Kim [11] introduced the polyexponential functions in the view of an inverse to the polylogarithm functions which were first studied by Hardy [12]. Many mathematicians have studied about “poly” for special polynomials and numbers arising from the polyexponential functions or the polylogarithm functions [4,8,10,13,14, 15,16]. Recently, the degenerate poly-Bell polynomials and the degenerate poly-Lah-Bell polynomials derived from the degenerate polyexponential functions were introduced in [17,18], respectively. In addition, it is briefly mentioned that the degenerate Daehee numbers of order k expressed the degenerate polyexponential functions in [19]. In this paper, we intend to study the above-mentioned properties by generalizing falling factorials and rising factorials, respectively, using the polyexponential functions. In Section 2, we define poly-falling factorial sequences arising from the polyexponential functions, reducing them to falling factorial if k = 1 . We demonstrate the relations: between poly-falling factorial sequences and the Stirling numbers of the first and second kind, respectively; between poly-falling factorial sequences and the poly-Bell polynomials; between poly-falling factorial sequences and the poly-Bernoulli numbers; between poly-falling factorial sequences and poly-Genocchi numbers; and recurrence formula of these sequences. In Section 3, we introduce poly-rising factorial sequences arising from the polyexponential functions, reducing them to rising factorial if k = 1 . To elaborate, we analyze the relationships: between poly-falling factorial sequences and poly-rising factorial sequences; between poly-rising factorial sequences of x and the Stirling numbers of the first kind and the power of x ; between poly-rising factorial sequences and Lah numbers the poly-falling factorial sequences; recurrence formula of these sequences; and reciprocal formula of the poly-falling factorial sequences.

First, definitions and preliminary properties required in this paper are introduced.

For x R , the falling factorials ( x ) n are defined by

(1) ( x ) n = x ( x 1 ) ( x 2 ) ( x n + 1 ) , ( n 1 ) and ( x ) 0 = 1

(see [1,2,7,20,21,22]).

For x R , the rising factorials x n are defined by

(2) x n = x ( x + 1 ) ( x + 2 ) ( x + n 1 ) , ( n 1 ) , and x 0 = 1

(see [2,5,6,20,21,22]).

It is well-known that for t < 1 ,

(3) ( 1 t ) m = l = 0 m l ( 1 ) l t l = l = 0 m l t l l !

(see [2,17,18]).

For n 0 , the Stirling numbers of the first kind S 1 ( n , l ) are the coefficients of x l in

(4) ( x ) n = l = 0 n S 1 ( n , l ) x l

(see [2,9,22]).

From (4), it is easy to see that

(5) 1 k ! ( log ( 1 + t ) ) k = n = k S 1 ( n , k ) t n n ! , ( t < 1 )

(see [2,9,22]).

In the inverse expression to (4), for n 0 , the nth power of x can be expressed in terms of the Stirling numbers of the second kind S 2 ( n , l ) as follows:

(6) x n = l = 0 n S 2 ( n , l ) ( x ) l ,

(see [2,7,21,22]).

From (6), it is easy to see that for t < 1 ,

(7) 1 k ! ( e t 1 ) k = n = k S 2 ( n , k ) t n n ! , ( t C )

(see [2,7,9,22]).

The Bell polynomials bel n ( x ) = k = 0 n S 2 ( n , k ) x n are natural extensions of the Bell numbers which are the number of ways to partition a set with n elements into nonempty subsets. It is well known that the generating function of the Bell polynomials is given by

e x ( e t 1 ) = n = 0 bel n ( x ) t n n ! , ( t C )

(see [2,3,10,23,24]).

The unsigned Lah number L ( n , j ) counts the number of ways a set of n elements can be partitioned into j nonempty linearly ordered subsets and has an explicit formula

(8) L ( n , j ) = n 1 j 1 n ! j ! , ( j 0 )

(see [2,5,6,8,18,25,26]).

From (1), the generating function of L ( n , k ) is given by

(9) 1 j ! t 1 t j = n = j L ( n , j ) t n n ! , ( j 0 ) , ( t C { 1 } )

(see [2,5,6,8,25,26]).

We observe that

(10) 1 1 t x = 1 + t 1 t x = j = 0 x j t 1 t j = n = 0 j = 0 n L ( n , j ) ( x ) j t n n ! .

On the other hand, we get

(11) 1 1 t x = ( 1 t ) x = n = 0 x n t n n ! .

From (10) and (11), we have

(12) x n = j = 0 n L ( n , j ) ( x ) j

(see [2,5]). Replacing x by x , we get easily

(13) ( x ) n = j = 0 n ( 1 ) n j L ( n , j ) x j

(see [5,6]).

Kim and Kim introduced the modified polyexponential functions as

(14) Ei k ( x ) = n = 1 x n ( n 1 ) ! n k , ( k Z )

(see [11]). When k = 1 , we see that Ei 1 ( x ) = e x 1 .

The poly-Bernoulli polynomials are defined by

(15) Ei k ( log ( 1 + t ) ) e t 1 e x t = n = 0 B n ( k ) ( x ) t n n !

(see [14,16]). When x = 0 , B n ( k ) = B n ( k ) ( 0 ) , which are called the poly-Bernoulli numbers [14,16].

Since Ei 1 ( log ( 1 + t ) ) = t , B n ( 1 ) ( x ) are the Bernoulli polynomials [1,5,13,19,22].

The poly-Genocchi polynomials are given by

(16) 2 Ei k ( log ( 1 + t ) ) e t + 1 e x t = n = 0 G n ( k ) ( x ) t n n !

(see [27]), and G 0 ( k ) ( x ) = 0 . When x = 0 , G n ( k ) = G n ( k ) ( 0 ) , which are called the poly-Genocchi numbers.

When k = 1 , G n ( 1 ) ( x ) are the Genocchi polynomials [4,27,28,29].

We introduced the poly-Bell polynomials by

(17) 1 + Ei k ( x ( e t 1 ) ) = n = 0 bel n ( k ) ( x ) t n n !

(see [17]), and bel 0 ( k ) ( x ) = 1 (see [17]).

When k = 1 , from (17), we note that

(18) 1 + Ei 1 ( x ( e t 1 ) ) = 1 + n = 1 ( x ( e t 1 ) ) n ( n 1 ) ! n = exp ( x ( e t 1 ) ) = n = 0 bel n ( x ) t n n ! .

Combining (17) with (18), we have the Bell polynomials

bel n ( 1 ) ( x ) = bel n ( x )

(see [2,3,22]).

As the multivariate version of the Stirling numbers S ( n , k ) of the second kind, the generation function of the incomplete Bell polynomials B n , k ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n k + 1 ) is given by

(19) 1 k ! h = 1 x h t h h ! k = n = k B n , k ( α 1 , α 2 , , α n k + 1 ) t n n !

(see [2,23,25,30]).

From (19), we obtain

(20) B n , k ( α 1 , α 2 , , α n k + 1 ) = h 1 + 2 h 2 + + n h n = n n ! h 1 ! h 2 ! h n k + 1 ! α 1 1 h 1 α 2 2 ! h 2 α n k + 1 ( n k + 1 ) ! h n k + 1

(see [2,23,25,31]), where the sum over all nonnegative integers h 1 , h 2 , , h n satisfying h 1 + h 2 + + h n k + 1 = k and h 1 + 2 h 2 + + ( n k + 1 ) h n k + 1 = n .

2 Poly-falling factorial sequences

In this section, we define the poly-falling factorial sequences by using the polyexponential functions. We also give some relations between them and special numbers, and derive recurrence formula of these sequences.

For n N { 0 } and x R , we consider the poly-falling factorial sequences ( x ) n ( k ) , which are arising from the polyexponential functions to be

(21) 1 + Ei k ( x log ( 1 + t ) ) = n = 0 ( x ) n ( k ) t n n ! and ( x ) 0 ( k ) = 1 ( x 0 , t < 1 ) .

Note that Ei 1 ( x ) = e x 1 .

When k = 1 , since Ei 1 ( x ) = e x 1 , we note that

(22) 1 + Ei 1 ( x log ( 1 + t ) ) = 1 + e x log ( 1 + t ) 1 = ( 1 + t ) x = n = 0 ( x ) n t n n ! .

Therefore, by (22), we have ( x ) n ( 1 ) = ( x ) n .

Theorem 1

For n N , k Z , and x R , we have

( x ) n ( k ) = d = 1 n 1 d k 1 S 1 ( n , d ) x d .

Proof

First, from (5), (14), and (21), we observe that

(23) 1 + Ei k ( x log ( 1 + t ) ) = 1 + d = 1 x d ( log ( 1 + t ) ) d ( d 1 ) ! d k = 1 + d = 1 x d d k 1 1 d ! ( log ( 1 + t ) ) d = 1 + d = 1 x d d k 1 n = d S 1 ( n , d ) t n n ! = 1 + n = 1 d = 1 n 1 d k 1 S 1 ( n , d ) x d t n n ! .

By comparing the coefficients of both sides of (23), we get the desired result.□

Theorem 2

For n N , k Z , and x R , we have

n k 1 d = 1 n S 2 ( n , d ) ( x ) d ( k ) = x n .

Proof

Substituting t by e t 1 in (21), the left-hand side of (21) is

(24) 1 + Ei k ( x t ) = 1 + n = 1 ( x t ) n ( n 1 ) ! n k = 1 + n = 1 x n n k 1 t n n ! .

On the other hand, from (7), the right-hand side of (21) is

(25) d = 0 ( x ) d ( k ) ( e t 1 ) d d ! = 1 + d = 1 ( x ) d ( k ) n = d S 2 ( n , d ) t n n ! = 1 + n = 1 d = 1 n ( x ) d ( k ) S 2 ( n , d ) t n n ! .

Combining (24) with (25), we have the desired result.□

In Theorems 1 and 2, when k = 1 , we note that

( x ) n = d = 0 n S 1 ( n , d ) x d and d = 0 n S 2 ( n , d ) ( x ) d = x n .

Theorem 3

For n N , k Z , and x R , we have

bel n ( k ) ( x ) = m = 1 n d = 1 m S 2 ( n , m ) S 2 ( m , d ) ( x ) d ( k ) .

Proof

Substituting t by e ( e t 1 ) 1 in (21), from (7), we observe that

(26) 1 + Ei k ( x ( e t 1 ) ) = 1 + d = 1 ( x ) d ( k ) ( e ( e t 1 ) 1 ) d d ! = 1 + d = 1 ( x ) d ( k ) m = d S 2 ( m , d ) ( e t 1 ) m m ! = 1 + m = 1 d = 1 m ( x ) d ( k ) S 2 ( m , d ) n = m S 2 ( n , m ) t n n ! = 1 + n = 1 m = 1 n d = 1 m S 2 ( n , m ) S 2 ( m , d ) ( x ) d ( k ) t n n ! .

By comparing the coefficients of (17) and (26), for n 1 we get

(27) bel n ( k ) ( x ) = m = 1 n d = 1 m S 2 ( n , m ) S 2 ( m , d ) ( x ) d ( k ) .

From (4) and (5), we observe that

(28) x n = l = 0 n S 2 ( n , l ) ( x ) l = d = 0 n S 2 ( n , d ) j = 0 d S 1 ( d , j ) x j = d = 0 n j = 0 d S 2 ( n , d ) S 1 ( d , j ) x j .

From (28), we have

(29) d = 0 n j = 0 d S 2 ( n , d ) S 1 ( d , j ) = δ n , j .

In Theorem 3, for n 1 when k = 1 , by using (4), (29), and Theorem 1, we note that

(30) bel n ( x ) = m = 1 n d = 1 m S 2 ( n , m ) S 2 ( m , d ) ( x ) d = m = 1 n d = 1 m j = 0 d S 2 ( n , m ) S 2 ( m , d ) S 1 ( d , j ) x j = j = 1 n S 2 ( n , j ) x j = j = 0 n S 2 ( n , j ) x j .

Theorem 4

For n N , k Z , and x R , we have

( x ) n ( k ) = d = 1 n m = d n S 1 ( n , m ) S 1 ( m , d ) bel d ( k ) ( x ) .

Proof

First, we observe that

(31) ( log ( log ( 1 + t ) + 1 ) ) d d ! = m = d S 1 ( m , d ) ( log ( 1 + t ) ) m m ! = m = d S 1 ( m , d ) n = m S 1 ( n , m ) t n n ! = n = d m = d n S 1 ( n , m ) S 1 ( m , d ) t n n ! .

Substituting t by log ( log ( 1 + t ) + 1 ) in (17), from (5), we observe that

(32) 1 + Ei k ( x log ( 1 + t ) ) = d = 0 bel d ( k ) ( x ) ( log ( log ( 1 + t ) + 1 ) ) d d ! = 1 + d = 1 bel d ( k ) ( x ) n = d m = d n S 1 ( n , m ) S 1 ( m , d ) t n n ! = 1 + n = 1 d = 1 n m = d n S 1 ( n , m ) S 1 ( m , d ) bel d ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! .

Combining (21) with (32), for n 1 , we have the desired result.□

Theorem 5

For n N and k Z , we have

( x ) 1 ( k 1 ) = ( x ) 1 ( k )

and

( x ) n ( k 1 ) = j = 1 n n j ( 1 ) j + 1 ( j 1 ) ! ( ( x ) n j + 1 ( k ) + ( n j ) ( x ) n j ( k ) ) , ( n 2 ) .

Proof

Differentiating with respect to t in (21), the left-hand side of (21) is

(33) t ( 1 + Ei k ( x log ( 1 + t ) ) ) = n = 1 x n ( log ( 1 + t ) ) n 1 ( n 1 ) ! n k 1 1 1 + t = 1 ( 1 + t ) log ( 1 + t ) n = 1 ( x log ( 1 + t ) ) n ( n 1 ) ! n k 1 = 1 ( 1 + t ) log ( 1 + t ) Ei k 1 ( x log ( 1 + t ) ) = 1 ( 1 + t ) log ( 1 + t ) n = 1 ( x ) n ( k 1 ) t n n ! .

On the other hand, the right-hand side of (21) is

(34) t n = 0 ( x ) n ( k ) t n n ! = n = 1 ( x ) n ( k ) t n 1 ( n 1 ) ! = n = 0 ( x ) n + 1 ( k ) t n n ! .

By (33) and (34), we get

(35) n = 1 ( x ) n ( k 1 ) t n n ! = ( 1 + t ) log ( 1 + t ) m = 0 ( x ) m + 1 ( k ) t m m ! = j = 1 ( 1 ) j + 1 j t j m = 0 ( x ) m + 1 ( k ) t m m ! + j = 1 ( 1 ) j + 1 j t j m = 0 ( x ) m + 1 ( k ) t m + 1 m ! = j = 1 ( 1 ) j + 1 ( j 1 ) ! t j j ! m = 0 ( x ) m + 1 ( k ) t m m ! + j = 1 ( 1 ) j + 1 ( j 1 ) ! t j j ! m = 1 ( x ) m ( k ) m t m m ! = n = 1 j = 1 n n j ( 1 ) j + 1 ( j 1 ) ! ( x ) n j + 1 ( k ) t n n ! + n = 2 j = 1 n n j ( 1 ) j + 1 ( j 1 ) ! ( n j ) ( x ) n j ( k ) t n n ! = ( x ) 1 ( k ) + n = 2 j = 1 n n j ( 1 ) j + 1 ( j 1 ) ! ( ( x ) n j + 1 ( k ) + ( n j ) ( x ) n j ( k ) ) t n n ! .

By comparing the coefficients of both sides of (35), we get the desired result.□

Theorem 6

For n N and k Z , we have

( 1 ) n ( k ) = m = 0 n n m B m ( k ) ,

where B n ( k ) are the poly-Bernoulli numbers.

Proof

From (15), we get

(36) Ei k ( log ( 1 + t ) ) = ( e t 1 ) m = 0 B m ( k ) t m m ! = j = 1 t j j ! m = 0 B m ( k ) t m m ! = n = 1 m = 0 n n m B m ( k ) t n n ! .

On the other hand, when x = 1 in (21), we observe that

(37) 1 + Ei k ( log ( 1 + t ) ) = n = 0 ( 1 ) n ( k ) t n n ! = 1 + n = 1 ( 1 ) n ( k ) t n n ! .

By (36) and (37), for n 1 , we attain the desired result.□

Corollary 7

For n N and k Z , we have

( 1 ) n ( k ) = B n ( k ) ( 1 ) B n ( k ) .

Proof

From (15), we observe that

(38) n = 0 B n ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! = 2 Ei k ( log ( 1 + t ) ) e t + 1 e x t = j = 0 B j ( k ) t j j ! m = 0 x m t m m ! = n = 0 j = 0 n n j B j ( k ) x n j t n n ! .

By comparing the coefficients of both sides of (38), we get

(39) B n ( k ) ( x ) = j = 0 n n j x n j B j ( k ) .

From (15) and (39), we have

(40) Ei k ( log ( 1 + t ) ) = ( e t 1 ) d = 0 B d ( k ) t d d ! = n = 0 d = 0 n n d B d ( k ) B n ( k ) t n n ! = n = 1 ( B n ( k ) ( 1 ) B n ( k ) ) t n n ! .

Combining (37) with (40), we have the desired result.□

Theorem 8

For n N and k Z , we have

( 1 ) n ( k ) = 1 2 d = 1 n 1 n d G d ( k ) + 2 G n ( k ) ,

where G d ( k ) are the poly-Genocchi numbers.

Proof

By (16) and G 0 ( k ) = 0 , we observe that

(41) 2 Ei k ( log ( 1 + t ) ) = ( e t + 1 ) d = 0 G d ( k ) t d d ! = j = 0 t j j ! d = 0 G d ( k ) t d d ! + d = 0 G d ( k ) t d d ! = n = 1 d = 0 n n d G d ( k ) t n n ! + n = 1 G n ( k ) t n n ! = n = 1 d = 1 n 1 n d G d ( k ) + 2 G n ( k ) t n n ! .

From (37) and (41), we get what we want.□

3 Poly-rising factorial sequences

In this section, we define poly-rising factorial sequences by using the polyexponential functions and give relations between poly-falling factorial sequences and poly-rising factorial sequences, and special numbers. We also study recurrence formula of these sequences and a reciprocal formula of the poly-falling factorial sequences.

Now, we consider the poly-rising factorial sequences x n ( k ) , which are arising from the polyexponential functions to be

(42) 1 + Ei k ( x log ( 1 t ) ) = n = 0 x n ( k ) t n n ! and x 0 ( k ) = 1 ( x 0 , t < 1 ) .

When k = 1 , since Ei 1 ( x ) = e x 1 , we note that

(43) 1 + Ei 1 ( x log ( 1 t ) ) = 1 + n = 1 ( x log ( 1 + t ) ) n n ! = e x log ( 1 t ) = ( 1 t ) x = n = 0 x n t n n ! .

Therefore, we have x n ( 1 ) = x n .

Theorem 9

For n N { 0 } and k Z

x n ( k ) = ( 1 ) n ( x ) n ( k ) and ( x ) n ( k ) = ( 1 ) n x n ( k ) .

Proof

From (21) and (42), we observe that

(44) n = 0 x n ( k ) t n n ! = 1 + Ei k ( x log ( 1 t ) ) = 1 + n = 1 ( x log ( 1 + ( t ) ) ) n ( n 1 ) ! n k = n = 0 ( x ) n ( k ) ( 1 ) n t n n ! = n = 0 ( 1 ) n ( x ) n ( k ) t n n !

and

(45) n = 0 ( x ) n ( k ) t n n ! = 1 + Ei k ( x log ( 1 + t ) ) = 1 + n = 1 ( ( x ) log ( 1 ( t ) ) ) n ( n 1 ) ! n k = n = 0 x n ( k ) ( 1 ) n t n n ! = n = 0 ( 1 ) n x n ( k ) t n n ! .

By comparing the coefficients of both sides of (44) and (45), respectively, we have the desired result.□

When k = 1 , we note that x n = ( 1 ) n ( x ) n .

From Theorems 6, 7, 8, and 9, we observe the following identities, respectively.

Corollary 10

For n N and k Z , we have

  1. 1 n ( k ) = m = 0 n ( 1 ) n n m B m ( k ) ,

  2. 1 n ( k ) = ( 1 ) n ( B n ( k ) ( 1 ) B n ( k ) ) ,

  3. 1 n ( k ) = 1 2 ( 1 ) n d = 1 n 1 d n G d ( k ) + 2 G n ( k ) ,

where B n ( k ) are poly-Bernoulli numbers and G n ( k ) are poly-Genocchi numbers.

Next two theorems are relations of poly-rising factorial sequences and powers of x .

Theorem 11

For n N and k Z , we have

x n ( k ) = d = 1 n ( 1 ) n + d d k 1 S 1 ( n , d ) x d .

Proof

First, from (5) and (14), we observe that

(46) 1 + Ei k ( x log ( 1 t ) ) = 1 + d = 1 ( 1 ) d x d ( log ( 1 t ) ) d ( d 1 ) ! d k = 1 + d = 1 ( 1 ) d x d d k 1 1 d ! ( log ( 1 t ) ) d = 1 + d = 1 ( 1 ) d x d d k 1 n = d S 1 ( n , d ) ( 1 ) n t n n ! = 1 + n = 1 d = 1 n ( 1 ) n + d d k 1 S 1 ( n , d ) x d t n n ! .

Combining (42) with (46), we get what we want.□

Theorem 12

For n N and k Z , we have

n k 1 d = 0 n ( 1 ) n + d S 2 ( n , d ) x d ( k ) = x n .

Proof

Substituting t by 1 e t in (42), the left-hand side of (42) is

(47) 1 + Ei k ( x t ) = 1 + n = 1 ( x t ) n ( n 1 ) ! n k = 1 + n = 1 x n n k 1 t n n ! .

On the other hand, from (7), the right-hand side (42) is

(48) d = 0 x d ( k ) ( 1 e t ) d d ! = d = 0 ( 1 ) d x d ( k ) n = d S 2 ( n , d ) ( 1 ) n t n n ! = 1 + n = 1 d = 0 n ( 1 ) n + d S 2 ( n , d ) x d ( k ) t n n ! .

From (47) and (48), we attain the desired result.□

To prove the next theorem, we observe that

(49) 1 1 t x = ( 1 t ) x = e x log ( 1 t ) = d = 0 ( 1 ) d x d ( log ( 1 t ) ) d d ! = n = 0 d = 0 n ( 1 ) n + d S 1 ( n , d ) x d t n n ! .

From (10) and (49), we obtain

(50) j = 0 n L ( n , j ) ( x ) j = d = 0 n ( 1 ) n + d S 1 ( n , d ) x d .

From (6) and (50), we note that

(51) j = 0 n L ( n , j ) ( x ) j = d = 0 n ( 1 ) n + d S 1 ( n , d ) x d = d = 0 n ( 1 ) n + d S 1 ( n , d ) j = 0 d S 2 ( d , j ) ( x ) j = j = 0 n d = j n ( 1 ) n + d S 1 ( n , d ) S 2 ( d , j ) ( x ) j .

By comparing the coefficients of both sides of (51), we obtain

(52) L ( n , j ) = d = j n ( 1 ) n + d S 1 ( n , d ) S 2 ( d , j ) .

Theorem 13

For n N and k Z , we have

( x ) n ( k ) = v = 0 n ( 1 ) v n L ( n , v ) x v ( k ) and x n ( k ) = v = 0 n L ( n , v ) ( x ) v ( k ) .

Proof

By (52), Theorems 1 and 12, we obtain

(53) ( x ) n ( k ) = d = 1 n 1 d k 1 S 1 ( n , d ) x d = d = 1 n 1 d k 1 S 1 ( n , d ) v = 0 d d k 1 ( 1 ) v + d S 2 ( d , v ) x v ( k ) = v = 1 n d = 1 n ( 1 ) v n ( 1 ) n + d S 1 ( n , d ) S 2 ( d , v ) x v ( k ) = v = 1 n ( 1 ) v n L ( n , v ) x v ( k ) .

By n 1 , L ( n , 0 ) = 0 , and (53), we obtain

(54) ( x ) n ( k ) = v = 0 n ( 1 ) v n L ( n , v ) x v ( k ) .

Thus, substituting x by x in (54) and by using Theorem 9, we arrive at the result.□

In Theorem 13, when k = 1 , we note that

( x ) n = v = 0 n ( 1 ) v n L ( n , v ) x v and x n = v = 0 n L ( n , v ) ( x ) v .

Theorem 14

For n N and k Z , we have

x 1 ( k 1 ) = x 1 ( k )

and

x n ( k 1 ) = j = 1 n n j ( j 1 ) ! ( x n j + 1 ( k ) ( n j ) x n j ( k ) ) ( n 2 ) .

Proof

Differentiating with respect to t in (42), the left-hand side of (42) is

(55) t ( 1 + Ei k ( x log ( 1 t ) ) ) = n = 1 ( x ) n ( log ( 1 t ) ) n 1 ( n 1 ) ! n k 1 1 1 t = 1 ( t 1 ) log ( 1 t ) n = 1 ( x log ( 1 t ) ) n ( n 1 ) ! n k 1 = 1 ( t 1 ) log ( 1 t ) Ei k 1 ( x log ( 1 t ) ) = 1 ( t 1 ) log ( 1 t ) n = 1 x n ( k 1 ) t n n ! .

On the other hand, the right-hand side of (42) is

(56) t n = 0 x n ( k ) t n n ! = n = 1 x n ( k ) t n 1 ( n 1 ) ! = n = 0 x n + 1 ( k ) t n n ! .

By (56) and (57), we obtain

(57) n = 1 x n ( k 1 ) t n n ! = ( t 1 ) log ( 1 t ) m = 0 x m + 1 ( k ) t m m ! = j = 1 1 j t j m = 0 x m + 1 ( k ) t m m ! + j = 1 1 j t j m = 0 x m + 1 ( k ) t m + 1 m ! = j = 1 j ! j t j j ! m = 0 x m + 1 ( k ) t m m ! + j = 1 j ! j t j j ! m = 1 x m ( k ) t m ( m 1 ) ! = n = 1 j = 1 n n j ( j 1 ) ! x n j + 1 ( k ) t n n ! + n = 2 j = 1 n n j ( j 1 ) ! ( n j ) x n j ( k ) t n n ! = x 1 ( k ) + n = 2 j = 1 n n j ( j 1 ) ! ( x n j + 1 ( k ) ( n j ) x n j ( k ) ) t n n ! .

By comparing the coefficients of both sides of (58), we get what we want.□

Now, we consider the reciprocal of the poly-falling factorial sequences given by

(58) 1 1 + Ei k ( x log ( 1 + t ) ) = n = 0 R n ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! .

In (59), when k = 1 , by (1), (2), (11), and (12), we observe that

(59) n = 0 R n ( 1 ) ( x ) t n n ! = 1 1 + Ei 1 ( x log ( 1 + t ) ) = 1 e x log ( 1 + t ) = ( 1 + t ) x = n = 0 ( 1 ) n x n t n n ! = n = 0 ( 1 ) n j = 0 n L ( n , j ) ( x ) j t n n ! .

From (59), we obtain

(60) R n ( 1 ) ( x ) = ( 1 ) n x n = ( x ) n = ( 1 ) n j = 0 n L ( n , j ) ( x ) j .

To give an explicit reciprocal formula of power series of the poly-falling factorial sequence ( x ) n ( k ) , when k = 1 , we get the following theorem.

Theorem 15

Assume that

n = 0 ( x ) n ( 1 ) t n n ! m = 0 R m ( 1 ) ( x ) t m m ! = 1 with ( x ) 0 ( k ) = 1 .

Then we have

R n ( 1 ) ( x ) = ( 1 ) n x n = ( x ) n = j = 0 n ( 1 ) n L ( n , j ) ( x ) j .

The following theorem can be obtained simply by using Theorem 5 of [23].

Theorem 16

Assume that

n = 0 ( x ) n ( k ) t n n ! m = 0 R m ( k ) ( x ) t m m ! = 1 with ( x ) 0 ( k ) = 1 .

Then we have

R 0 ( k ) ( x ) = 1 and R n ( k ) ( x ) = d = 1 n B n , d ( ( x ) 1 ( k ) , ( x ) 2 ( k ) , , ( x ) n d + 1 ( k ) ) ( 1 ) d d ! = d = 1 n h 1 + 2 h 2 + + n h n = n n ! h 1 ! h 2 ! h n d + 1 ! x 1 ! h 1 j = 1 2 1 j k 1 S 1 ( 2 , j ) x j 2 ! h 2 j = 1 n d + 1 1 j k 1 S 1 ( n d + 1 , j ) x j ( n d + 1 ) ! h n d + 1 .

Proof

We observe that

(61) d = 0 ( x ) d ( k ) t d d ! m = 0 R m ( k ) ( x ) t m m ! = n = 0 d = 0 n n d ( x ) d ( k ) R n d ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! = 1 .

From (61), we have

(62) R 0 ( k ) ( x ) = 1 and d = 0 n n d ( x ) d ( k ) R n d ( k ) ( x ) = 0 , ( n 1 ) .

From (62), we obtain

(63) R n ( k ) ( x ) = d = 1 n n d ( x ) d ( k ) R n d ( k ) ( x ) .

When n = 1 , we have

(64) R 1 ( k ) ( x ) = ( x ) 1 ( k ) R 0 ( k ) ( x ) = ( x ) 1 ( k ) .

When n = 2 , we obtain

(65) R 2 ( k ) ( x ) = 2 1 ( x ) 2 ( k ) R 1 ( k ) ( x ) ( x ) 2 ( k ) = 2 ( ( x ) 1 ( k ) ) 2 ( x ) 2 ( k ) .

On the other hand, from (19), we observe that

B 2 , 1 ( x 1 , x 2 ) = h 1 + h 2 = 1 h 1 + 2 h 2 = 2 2 ! h 1 ! h 2 ! x 1 1 ! h 1 x 2 2 ! h 2 = 2 ! 0 ! 1 ! x 1 1 ! 0 x 2 2 ! 1 = x 2

and

(66) B 2 , 2 ( x 1 ) = h 1 = 2 2 ! 2 ! x 1 1 ! 2 = x 1 2 .

By (66), we have

(67) d = 1 2 B 2 , d ( x 1 , x 2 , , x 2 k + 1 ) ( 1 ) d d ! = B 2 , 1 ( x 1 , x 2 ) + 2 ! B 2 , 2 ( x 1 ) = x 2 + 2 ( x 1 ) 2 .

From (65) and (67), we obtain

(68) R 2 ( k ) ( x ) = ( x ) 2 ( k ) + 2 ( ( x ) 1 ( k ) ) 2 = d = 1 n B 2 , d ( ( x ) 1 ( k ) , ( x ) 2 ( k ) ) ( 1 ) d d ! .

When n = 3 ,

(69) R 3 ( k ) ( x ) = 3 1 ( x ) 1 ( k ) R 2 ( k ) ( x ) 3 2 ( x ) 2 ( k ) R 1 ( k ) ( x ) ( x ) 3 ( k ) = 3 ( x ) 1 ( k ) ( 2 ( ( x ) 1 ( k ) ) 2 ( x ) 2 ( k ) ) 3 ( x ) 2 ( k ) ( ( x ) 1 ( k ) ) ( x ) 3 ( k ) = 6 ( ( x ) 1 ( k ) ) 3 + 6 ( x ) 2 ( k ) ( x ) 1 ( k ) ( x ) 3 ( k ) .

On the other hand, from (19), we observe that

(70) B 3 , 1 ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) = h 1 + h 2 + h 3 = 1 h 1 + 2 h 2 + 3 h 3 = 3 2 ! h 1 ! h 2 ! 3 ! h 1 ! h 2 ! h 3 ! x 1 1 ! h 1 x 2 2 ! h 2 x 3 3 ! h 3 = 3 ! 0 ! 0 ! 1 ! x 3 3 ! = x 3 , B 3 , 2 ( x 1 , x 2 ) = 3 x 1 x 2 , and B 3 , 3 ( x 1 ) = x 1 3 .

By (70), we have

(71) d = 1 3 B 3 , d ( x 1 , x 2 , , x 3 k + 1 ) ( 1 ) d d ! = B 3 , 1 ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) + 2 ! B 3 , 2 ( x 1 , x 2 ) 3 ! B 3 , 3 ( x 1 ) = x 3 + 6 x 1 x 2 3 ! ( x 1 ) 3 .

From (69) and (71), we obtain

(72) R 3 ( k ) ( x ) = 6 ( ( x ) 1 ( k ) ) 3 + 6 ( x ) 2 ( k ) ( x ) 1 ( k ) ( x ) 3 ( k ) = d = 1 n B 3 , d ( ( x ) 1 ( k ) , ( x ) 2 ( k ) , ( x ) 3 ( k ) ) ( 1 ) d d ! .

Continuing this process, we have

(73) R n ( k ) ( x ) = d = 1 n B n , d ( ( x ) 1 ( k ) , ( x ) 2 ( k ) , , ( x ) n d + 1 ( k ) ) ( 1 ) d d ! .

By comparing (20), (73), and Theorem 1, we obtain the desired result.□

4 Conclusion

To conclude, note that in Section 2 we introduced poly-falling factorial sequences in terms of the polyexponential functions, reducing them to rising factorial if k = 1 . We demonstrated the following: the nth poly-falling factorial sequences of x were expressed in terms of the Stirling numbers of the first kind and the power of x ; the nth power of x were expressed in terms of the Stirling numbers of the second kind and poly-falling factorial sequences of x ; the poly-Bell polynomials were represented in terms of the poly-falling factorial sequences; the poly-falling poly-falling factorial sequences were represented in terms of the poly-Bell polynomials; recurrence formula; and the poly-falling factorial sequences were expressed in terms of the poly-Bernoulli numbers and poly-Genocchi numbers, respectively. In addition, in Section 3 we introduced poly-rising factorial sequences in terms of the polyexponential functions, reducing them to rising factorial if k = 1 . Thus, these relations between poly-falling factorial sequences and poly-rising factorial sequences were expressed as: the nth poly-rising factorial sequences of x were expressed in terms of the Stirling numbers of the first kind and the power of x ; the nth power of x were expressed in terms of the Stirling numbers of the second kind and poly-rising factorial sequences; the poly-falling factorial sequences are represented in terms of Lah numbers and the poly-rising factorial sequences; the poly-rising factorial sequences were represented in terms of Lah numbers and the poly-falling factorial sequences; a recurrence formula; and a reciprocal formula of the poly-falling factorial sequences.

In conclusion, in [8], one of the generalizations of Lah numbers, multi-Lah number was studied using the polylogarithms. From a similar point of view, we may generalize the results of the poly-falling factorial sequences and the poly-rising factorial sequences, respectively. There are various methods for studying special polynomials and numbers, including generating functions, combinatorial methods, umbral calculus, differential equations, and probability theory. The next academic project for our continuing research would be to examine the application of “poly” versions of certain special polynomials and numbers in the domains of physics, science, and engineering as well as mathematics of course.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Jangjeon Institute for Mathematical Science for the support of this research.

  1. Funding information: This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program, the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021R1F1A1050151).

  2. Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interest.

  3. Data availability statement: This paper does not use data and materials.

References

[1] L. Carlitz , Degenerate Stirling, Bernoulli and Eulerian numbers, Utilitas Math. 15 (1979), 51–88. Search in Google Scholar

[2] L. Comtet , Advanced Combinatorics: The Art of Finite and Infinite Expansions, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1974. 10.1007/978-94-010-2196-8Search in Google Scholar

[3] D. V. Dolgy , D. S. Kim , T. Kim , and J. Kwon , On fully degenerate Bell numbers and polynomials, Filomat 34 (2020), no. 2, 507–514, https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL2002507D. Search in Google Scholar

[4] U. Duran , M. Acikgoz , and S. Araci , Construction of the type 2 poly-Frobenius-Genocchi polynomials with their certain applications, Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020 (2020), 432, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02889-2. Search in Google Scholar

[5] N. Kilar and Y. Simsek , Formulas and relations of special numbers and polynomials arising from functional equations of generating functions, Montes Taurus 3 (2021), 106–123. Search in Google Scholar

[6] D. S. Kim and T. Kim , Lah-Bell numbers and polynomials, Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 23 (2020), no. 4, 577–586. Search in Google Scholar

[7] D. S. Kim and T. Kim , A note on a new type of degenerate Bernoulli numbers, Russ. J. Math. Phys. 27 (2020), no. 2, 227–235, https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061920820020090. Search in Google Scholar

[8] D. S. Kim , H. K. Kim , T. Kim , H. Lee , and S. Park , Multi-Lah numbers and multi-Stirling numbers of the first kind, Adv. Difference Equ. 2021 (2021), 411, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03568-6. Search in Google Scholar

[9] T. Kim , A note on degenerate Stirling polynomials of the second kind, Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 20 (2017), no. 3, 319–331. Search in Google Scholar

[10] T. Kim and D. S. Kim , Degenerate polyexponential functions and degenerate Bell polynomials, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 487 (2020), no. 2, 124017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2020.124017. Search in Google Scholar

[11] D. S. Kim and T. Kim , A note on polyexponential and unipoly functions, Russ. J. Math. Phys. 26 (2019), no. 1, 40–49, https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061920819010047. Search in Google Scholar

[12] G. H. Hardy , On a class of analytic functions, Proc. London Math. Soc. s2–3 (1905), no. 3, 441–460. 10.1112/plms/s2-3.1.441Search in Google Scholar

[13] A. Bayad and Y. Hamahata , Polylogarithms and poly-Bernoulli polynomials, Kyushu J. Math. 65 (2012), no. 1, 15–24, https://doi.org/10.2206/kyushujm.65.15. Search in Google Scholar

[14] T. Kim , D. S. Kim , J. K. Kwon , and H. S. Lee , Degenerate polyexponential functions and type 2 degenerate poly-Bernoulli numbers and polynomials, Adv. Difference Equ. 2020 (2020), 168, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02636-7. Search in Google Scholar

[15] T. Kim , D. S. Kim , H. Y. Kim , H. Lee , and L. C. Jang , Degenerate poly-Bernoulli polynomials arising from degenerate polylogarithm, Adv. Difference Equ. 2020 (2020), 444, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02901-9. Search in Google Scholar

[16] T. Kim , D. S. Kim , J. Kwon , and H. Lee , Representations of degenerate poly-Bernoulli polynomials, J. Inequal. Appl. 2021 (2021), 58, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-021-02592-0. Search in Google Scholar

[17] T. Kim and H. K. Kim , Degenerate poly-Bell polynomials and numbers, Adv. Difference Equ. 2021 (2021), 361, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03522-6. Search in Google Scholar

[18] T. Kim and H. K. Kim , Degenerate poly-Lah-Bell polynomials and numbers, preprint (2021), https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352787819_DEGENERATE_POLY-LAH-BELL_POLYNOMIALS_AND_NUMBERS. 10.1186/s13662-021-03522-6Search in Google Scholar

[19] T. Kim , D. S. Kim , H. Y. Kim , and J. Kwon , Some results on degenerate Daehee and Bernoulli numbers and polynomials, Adv. Difference Equ. 2020 (2020), 311, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02778-8. Search in Google Scholar

[20] T. Kim and D. S. Kim , A note on central Bell numbers and polynomials, Russ. J. Math. Phys. 27 (2020), no. 1, 76–81. 10.1134/S1061920820010070Search in Google Scholar

[21] I. Kucukoglu and Y. Simsek , Construction and computation of unified Stirling-type numbers emerging from p-adic integrals and symmetric polynomials, RACSAM 115 (2021), 167, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-021-01107-2. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Y. Simsek , Explicit formulas for p-adic integrals: Approach to p-adic distributions and some families of special numbers and polynomials, Montes Taurus 1 (2019), MTJPAM-D-19-00005. Search in Google Scholar

[23] D. S. Kim , T. Kim , S.-H. Lee , and J.-W. Park , Some new formulae of complete and incomplete degenerate Bell polynomials, Adv. Difference Equ. 2021 (2021), 326, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03479-6. Search in Google Scholar

[24] T. Kim , D. S. Kim , L.-C. Jang , H. Lee , and H. Kim , Generalized degenerate Bernoulli numbers and polynomials arising from Gauss hypergeometric function, Adv. Difference Equ. 2021 (2021), 175, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03337-5. Search in Google Scholar

[25] H. K. Kim and D. S. Lee , Degenerate s -extended complete and incomplete Lah-Bell polynomials, Comput. Modeling Eng. Sci. (2022), 10.32604/cmes.2022.017616 (to appear). Search in Google Scholar

[26] Y. Simsek , Formulas for Poisson Charlier, Hermite, Milne-Thomson and other type polynomials by their generating functions and p-adic integral approach, RACSAM 113 (2019), 931–948, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-018-0528-6. Search in Google Scholar

[27] T. Kim , D. S. Kim , J. Kwon , and H. Y. Kim , A note on degenerate Genocchi and poly-Genocchi numbers and polynomials, J. Inequal. Appl. 2020 (2020), 110, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-020-02378-w. Search in Google Scholar

[28] T. Kim , D. S. Kim , D. V. Dolgy , and J. Kwon , Some identities on degenerate Genocchi and Euler numbers, Informatica 31 (2020), no. 4, 42–51. Search in Google Scholar

[29] B. Kurt and Y. Simsek , On the Hermite based Genocchi polynomials, Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 23 (2013), 13–17. Search in Google Scholar

[30] T. Kim , D. S. Kim , J. Kwon , H. Lee , and S.-H. Park , Some properties of degenerate complete and partial Bell polynomials, Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021 (2021), 304, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03460-3. Search in Google Scholar

[31] T. Kim , D. S. Kim , L.-C. Jang , H. Lee , and H.-Y. Kim , Complete and incomplete Bell polynomials associated with Lah-Bell numbers and polynomials, Adv. Difference Equ. 2021 (2021), 101, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03258-3. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-10-31
Accepted: 2021-12-01
Published Online: 2021-12-31

© 2021 Hye Kyung Kim, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Sharp conditions for the convergence of greedy expansions with prescribed coefficients
  3. Range-kernel weak orthogonality of some elementary operators
  4. Stability analysis for Selkov-Schnakenberg reaction-diffusion system
  5. On non-normal cyclic subgroups of prime order or order 4 of finite groups
  6. Some results on semigroups of transformations with restricted range
  7. Quasi-ideal Ehresmann transversals: The spined product structure
  8. On the regulator problem for linear systems over rings and algebras
  9. Solvability of the abstract evolution equations in Ls-spaces with critical temporal weights
  10. Resolving resolution dimensions in triangulated categories
  11. Entire functions that share two pairs of small functions
  12. On stochastic inverse problem of construction of stable program motion
  13. Pentagonal quasigroups, their translatability and parastrophes
  14. Counting certain quadratic partitions of zero modulo a prime number
  15. Global attractors for a class of semilinear degenerate parabolic equations
  16. A new implicit symmetric method of sixth algebraic order with vanished phase-lag and its first derivative for solving Schrödinger's equation
  17. On sub-class sizes of mutually permutable products
  18. Asymptotic solution of the Cauchy problem for the singularly perturbed partial integro-differential equation with rapidly oscillating coefficients and with rapidly oscillating heterogeneity
  19. Existence and asymptotical behavior of solutions for a quasilinear Choquard equation with singularity
  20. On kernels by rainbow paths in arc-coloured digraphs
  21. Fully degenerate Bell polynomials associated with degenerate Poisson random variables
  22. Multiple solutions and ground state solutions for a class of generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation
  23. A note on maximal operators related to Laplace-Bessel differential operators on variable exponent Lebesgue spaces
  24. Weak and strong estimates for linear and multilinear fractional Hausdorff operators on the Heisenberg group
  25. Partial sums and inclusion relations for analytic functions involving (p, q)-differential operator
  26. Hodge-Deligne polynomials of character varieties of free abelian groups
  27. Diophantine approximation with one prime, two squares of primes and one kth power of a prime
  28. The equivalent parameter conditions for constructing multiple integral half-discrete Hilbert-type inequalities with a class of nonhomogeneous kernels and their applications
  29. Boundedness of vector-valued sublinear operators on weighted Herz-Morrey spaces with variable exponents
  30. On some new quantum midpoint-type inequalities for twice quantum differentiable convex functions
  31. Quantum Ostrowski-type inequalities for twice quantum differentiable functions in quantum calculus
  32. Asymptotic measure-expansiveness for generic diffeomorphisms
  33. Infinitesimals via Cauchy sequences: Refining the classical equivalence
  34. The (1, 2)-step competition graph of a hypertournament
  35. Properties of multiplication operators on the space of functions of bounded φ-variation
  36. Disproving a conjecture of Thornton on Bohemian matrices
  37. Some estimates for the commutators of multilinear maximal function on Morrey-type space
  38. Inviscid, zero Froude number limit of the viscous shallow water system
  39. Inequalities between height and deviation of polynomials
  40. New criteria-based ℋ-tensors for identifying the positive definiteness of multivariate homogeneous forms
  41. Determinantal inequalities of Hua-Marcus-Zhang type for quaternion matrices
  42. On a new generalization of some Hilbert-type inequalities
  43. On split quaternion equivalents for Quaternaccis, shortly Split Quaternaccis
  44. On split regular BiHom-Poisson color algebras
  45. Asymptotic stability of the time-changed stochastic delay differential equations with Markovian switching
  46. The mixed metric dimension of flower snarks and wheels
  47. Oscillatory bifurcation problems for ODEs with logarithmic nonlinearity
  48. The B-topology on S-doubly quasicontinuous posets
  49. Hyers-Ulam stability of isometries on bounded domains
  50. Inhomogeneous conformable abstract Cauchy problem
  51. Path homology theory of edge-colored graphs
  52. Refinements of quantum Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities
  53. Symmetric graphs of valency seven and their basic normal quotient graphs
  54. Mean oscillation and boundedness of multilinear operator related to multiplier operator
  55. Numerical methods for time-fractional convection-diffusion problems with high-order accuracy
  56. Several explicit formulas for (degenerate) Narumi and Cauchy polynomials and numbers
  57. Finite groups whose intersection power graphs are toroidal and projective-planar
  58. On primitive solutions of the Diophantine equation x2 + y2 = M
  59. A note on polyexponential and unipoly Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind
  60. On the type 2 poly-Bernoulli polynomials associated with umbral calculus
  61. Some estimates for commutators of Littlewood-Paley g-functions
  62. Construction of a family of non-stationary combined ternary subdivision schemes reproducing exponential polynomials
  63. On the evolutionary bifurcation curves for the one-dimensional prescribed mean curvature equation with logistic type
  64. On intersections of two non-incident subgroups of finite p-groups
  65. Global existence and boundedness in a two-species chemotaxis system with nonlinear diffusion
  66. Finite groups with 4p2q elements of maximal order
  67. Positive solutions of a discrete nonlinear third-order three-point eigenvalue problem with sign-changing Green's function
  68. Power moments of automorphic L-functions related to Maass forms for SL3(ℤ)
  69. Entire solutions for several general quadratic trinomial differential difference equations
  70. Strong consistency of regression function estimator with martingale difference errors
  71. Fractional Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for interval-valued co-ordinated convex functions
  72. Montgomery identity and Ostrowski-type inequalities via quantum calculus
  73. Universal inequalities of the poly-drifting Laplacian on smooth metric measure spaces
  74. On reducible non-Weierstrass semigroups
  75. so-metrizable spaces and images of metric spaces
  76. Some new parameterized inequalities for co-ordinated convex functions involving generalized fractional integrals
  77. The concept of cone b-Banach space and fixed point theorems
  78. Complete consistency for the estimator of nonparametric regression model based on m-END errors
  79. A posteriori error estimates based on superconvergence of FEM for fractional evolution equations
  80. Solution of integral equations via coupled fixed point theorems in 𝔉-complete metric spaces
  81. Symmetric pairs and pseudosymmetry of Θ-Yetter-Drinfeld categories for Hom-Hopf algebras
  82. A new characterization of the automorphism groups of Mathieu groups
  83. The role of w-tilting modules in relative Gorenstein (co)homology
  84. Primitive and decomposable elements in homology of ΩΣℂP
  85. The G-sequence shadowing property and G-equicontinuity of the inverse limit spaces under group action
  86. Classification of f-biharmonic submanifolds in Lorentz space forms
  87. Some new results on the weaving of K-g-frames in Hilbert spaces
  88. Matrix representation of a cross product and related curl-based differential operators in all space dimensions
  89. Global optimization and applications to a variational inequality problem
  90. Functional equations related to higher derivations in semiprime rings
  91. A partial order on transformation semigroups with restricted range that preserve double direction equivalence
  92. On multi-step methods for singular fractional q-integro-differential equations
  93. Compact perturbations of operators with property (t)
  94. Entire solutions for several complex partial differential-difference equations of Fermat type in ℂ2
  95. Random attractors for stochastic plate equations with memory in unbounded domains
  96. On the convergence of two-step modulus-based matrix splitting iteration method
  97. On the separation method in stochastic reconstruction problem
  98. Robust estimation for partial functional linear regression models based on FPCA and weighted composite quantile regression
  99. Structure of coincidence isometry groups
  100. Sharp function estimates and boundedness for Toeplitz-type operators associated with general fractional integral operators
  101. Oscillatory hyper-Hilbert transform on Wiener amalgam spaces
  102. Euler-type sums involving multiple harmonic sums and binomial coefficients
  103. Poly-falling factorial sequences and poly-rising factorial sequences
  104. Geometric approximations to transition densities of Jump-type Markov processes
  105. Multiple solutions for a quasilinear Choquard equation with critical nonlinearity
  106. Bifurcations and exact traveling wave solutions for the regularized Schamel equation
  107. Almost factorizable weakly type B semigroups
  108. The finite spectrum of Sturm-Liouville problems with n transmission conditions and quadratic eigenparameter-dependent boundary conditions
  109. Ground state sign-changing solutions for a class of quasilinear Schrödinger equations
  110. Epi-quasi normality
  111. Derivative and higher-order Cauchy integral formula of matrix functions
  112. Commutators of multilinear strongly singular integrals on nonhomogeneous metric measure spaces
  113. Solutions to a multi-phase model of sea ice growth
  114. Existence and simulation of positive solutions for m-point fractional differential equations with derivative terms
  115. Bernstein-Walsh type inequalities for derivatives of algebraic polynomials in quasidisks
  116. Review Article
  117. Semiprimeness of semigroup algebras
  118. Special Issue on Problems, Methods and Applications of Nonlinear Analysis (Part II)
  119. Third-order differential equations with three-point boundary conditions
  120. Fractional calculus, zeta functions and Shannon entropy
  121. Uniqueness of positive solutions for boundary value problems associated with indefinite ϕ-Laplacian-type equations
  122. Synchronization of Caputo fractional neural networks with bounded time variable delays
  123. On quasilinear elliptic problems with finite or infinite potential wells
  124. Deterministic and random approximation by the combination of algebraic polynomials and trigonometric polynomials
  125. On a fractional Schrödinger-Poisson system with strong singularity
  126. Parabolic inequalities in Orlicz spaces with data in L1
  127. Special Issue on Evolution Equations, Theory and Applications (Part II)
  128. Impulsive Caputo-Fabrizio fractional differential equations in b-metric spaces
  129. Existence of a solution of Hilfer fractional hybrid problems via new Krasnoselskii-type fixed point theorems
  130. On a nonlinear system of Riemann-Liouville fractional differential equations with semi-coupled integro-multipoint boundary conditions
  131. Blow-up results of the positive solution for a class of degenerate parabolic equations
  132. Long time decay for 3D Navier-Stokes equations in Fourier-Lei-Lin spaces
  133. On the extinction problem for a p-Laplacian equation with a nonlinear gradient source
  134. General decay rate for a viscoelastic wave equation with distributed delay and Balakrishnan-Taylor damping
  135. On hyponormality on a weighted annulus
  136. Exponential stability of Timoshenko system in thermoelasticity of second sound with a memory and distributed delay term
  137. Convergence results on Picard-Krasnoselskii hybrid iterative process in CAT(0) spaces
  138. Special Issue on Boundary Value Problems and their Applications on Biosciences and Engineering (Part I)
  139. Marangoni convection in layers of water-based nanofluids under the effect of rotation
  140. A transient analysis to the M(τ)/M(τ)/k queue with time-dependent parameters
  141. Existence of random attractors and the upper semicontinuity for small random perturbations of 2D Navier-Stokes equations with linear damping
  142. Degenerate binomial and Poisson random variables associated with degenerate Lah-Bell polynomials
  143. Special Issue on Fractional Problems with Variable-Order or Variable Exponents (Part I)
  144. On the mixed fractional quantum and Hadamard derivatives for impulsive boundary value problems
  145. The Lp dual Minkowski problem about 0 < p < 1 and q > 0
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2021-0128/html
Scroll to top button