Home On intersections of two non-incident subgroups of finite p-groups
Article Open Access

On intersections of two non-incident subgroups of finite p-groups

  • Jiao Wang EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 28, 2021

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate finite p-groups G such that whenever A , B < G are non-incident, then A B A , B . This partially solves a problem proposed by Y. Berkovich.

MSC 2010: 20D15

1 Introduction

All groups considered in this paper are finite.

Let G be a group. If H and K are normal subgroups of G , then H K H and H K K . It is interesting to investigate the structure of a group G by using the intersection of two subgroups of finite p-groups. For example, Janko in [1] determined completely the structure of 2-groups G in which any two distinct maximal abelian subgroups have cyclic intersection. Janko in [2] also classified non-abelian 2-groups such that any two distinct minimal non-abelian subgroups have cyclic intersection. We also remark that many authors investigate the structure of groups by using information about the intersection of the subgroups, for example [3,4].

In fact, it is easy to see that G is a Dedekind group if H K H and H K K for any two subgroups H and K of G . Now it is natural to ask the following question:

What can be said about the structure of a p-group G in which H K H and H K K for any two non-incident subgroups H and K of G ?

The question above was first posed by Berkovich (see Problem 1342 in [5] and Problem 1546 in [6]). In this paper, we hope to investigate the structure of a p-group G in which H K H and H K K for any two non-incident subgroups H and K of G (this means that H K and K H ). For convenience, we call this kind of p-groups Q -p-groups. In this paper, we get the following main results:

Main result 1.1

Suppose that G is a non-abelian 2-group of order 2 n and d ( G ) = 2 . Then G is a Q -2-group if and only if G is one of the following groups:

  1. G is a minimal non-abelian 2-group;

  2. 2-groups of maximal class;

  3. a , b a 8 = b 2 n 3 = 1 , [ a , b ] = b 2 , n 6 ;

  4. a , b a 8 = b 2 n 3 = 1 , [ a , b ] = b 2 n 4 + 2 , n 6 ;

  5. a , b a 4 = b 2 n 2 = 1 , [ a , b ] = b 2 , n 5 ;

  6. a , b a 4 = b 2 n 2 = 1 , [ a , b ] = b 2 n 3 + 2 , n 5 ;

  7. a , b a 8 = b 2 n 2 = 1 , a 4 = b 2 n 3 , [ a , b ] = b 2 , n 5 ;

  8. a , b , c a 8 = c 2 = 1 , a 4 = b 2 , [ a , b ] = c , [ c , a ] = a 4 , [ c , b ] = 1 ;

  9. a , b , c a 8 = 1 , a 4 = b 2 = c 2 , [ b , a ] = c , [ c , a ] = 1 , [ c , b ] = c 2 ;

  10. a , b , c a 2 n 2 = b 2 = 1 , c 2 = a 2 n 3 , [ b , a ] = c , [ c , a ] = 1 , [ c , b ] = c 2 .

Main result 1.2

Let G be a Q -2-group and d ( G ) 3 . Then exp ( G ) 2 and c ( G ) 2 .

Main result 1.3

Let G be a Q -2-group with d ( G ) 4 and G 2 7 . Then G is Dedekind.

Main result 1.4

Let G be a Q -p-group and p > 2 . Then exp ( G ) p and c ( G ) 3 .

Main result 1.5

Let G be a Q -p-group with d ( G ) 4 and p > 2 . Then G is abelian.

2 Preliminaries

First we introduce some notions and notations.

Let G be a group. If every subgroup of G is normal, then G is called a Dedekind group.

Let G be a p-group. We use D 2 n , Q 2 n and S D 2 n to denote the dihedral group, the generalized quaternion group and the semi-dihedral group of order 2 n , respectively. We also use d ( G ) and C p m to denote the minimal number of generators of G and the cyclic group of order p m . Let G n ( G ) = [ g 1 , g 2 , , g n ] g i G . Then c ( G ) denotes the nilpotency class of G . If H and K are groups, then H K denotes a central product of H and K . H G = x G x 1 H x is the normal core of the subgroup H in G . M G means M is a maximal subgroup of G . For other notations and terminologies the reader is referred to [7].

Now we list some known results which will be used later.

Lemma 2.1

[8, Section 36, Remark 1] Let G be a p-group. If there is a normal subgroup R < G such that G / R is metacyclic, then G is also metacyclic.

Lemma 2.2

[8, Section 1, Exercise 8a] Let G be a minimal non-abelian p-group. Then G is one of the following groups:

  1. Q 8 ;

  2. M p ( n , m ) = a , b a p n = b p m = 1 , [ a , b ] = a p n 1 is metacyclic with n 2 and m 1 ;

  3. M p ( n , m , 1 ) = a , b , c a p n = b p m = c p = 1 , [ a , b ] = c , [ c , a ] = [ c , b ] = 1 is non-metacyclic with n m 1 and m + n 3 when p = 2 .

Lemma 2.3

[8, Section Appendix 1, Theorem A.1.4] Let G be a p-group and x , y G .

  1. ( x y ) p x p y p (mod 1 ( G ) G p ).

  2. [ x p , y ] [ x , y ] p (mod 1 ( N ) N p ), where N = x , [ x , y ] .

Lemma 2.4

[8, Section 1, Proposition 1.23] If a p-group G is non-Dedekind, then there exists a normal subgroup K of index p in G such that G / K is non-Dedekind.

Lemma 2.5

[9, Lemma 2.2] Suppose that G is a finite non-abelian p-group. Then the following conditions are equivalent:

  1. G is minimal non-abelian;

  2. d ( G ) = 2 and G = p ;

  3. d ( G ) = 2 and Φ ( G ) = Z ( G ) .

Lemma 2.6

[10, Theorem 2] Let G be a metacyclic 2-group. Then G has one presentation of the following three kinds:

  1. G has a cyclic maximal subgroup.

  2. Ordinary metacyclic 2-groups G = a , b a 2 r + s + u = 1 , b 2 r + s + t = a 2 r + s , a b = a 1 + 2 r , where r , s , t , u are non-negative integers with r 2 and u r .

  3. Exceptional metacyclic 2-groups G = a , b a 2 r + s + v + t + u = 1 , b 2 r + s + t = a 2 r + s + v + t , a b = a 1 + 2 r + v , where r , s , v , t , t , u are non-negative integers with r 2 , t r , u 1 , t t = s v = t v = 0 , and if t r 1 , then u = 0 .

Groups of different types or of the same type but with different values of parameters are not isomorphic to each other.

Lemma 2.7

[11, Theorem 3] Let G be a 3-group in which x / x G 3 , for any x G . Then c ( G ) 4 if d ( G ) = 2 and c ( G ) 5 if d ( G ) > 2 .

Lemma 2.8

[11, Theorem 6] Let G be a 3-group in which x / x G 3 , for any x G . If d ( G ) = 2 , then exp ( G ) 9 and exp ( G 3 ) 3 .

Lemma 2.9

[12, Corollary 2] Let G be a p-group with G 1 and p > 2 . Then d ( G ) log p Ω 1 ( G ) .

3 Some properties of Q -p-groups

In this section, we discuss the properties of Q -p-groups which will be used later.

Lemma 3.1

Let G be a Q -p-group. If H is a subgroup of G and N is a normal subgroup of G , then H and G / N are Q -p-groups.

Proof

Let A and B be subgroups of H and A B , B A . Then, by the hypotheses of the lemma, A B A , B .

Set G ¯ = G / N . Let K ¯ = K / N and L ¯ = L / N be subgroups of G ¯ and K ¯ L ¯ , L ¯ K ¯ . Then K L , L K . By the hypotheses, we see K L ¯ K , L ¯ . It follows that K ¯ L ¯ K ¯ , L ¯ . Thus, the lemma is true.□

Lemma 3.2

Let G be a Q -p-group. Then, for any x G , x p G .

Proof

Without loss of generality, we may assume x Z ( G ) and o ( x ) > p . Take y G . If x y or y x , then [ x , y ] = 1 and so y C G ( x ) C G ( x p ) . If y x , then y , x p x . If x y , then x y , x p . Otherwise, we see x p Φ ( y , x p ) and so y , x p = y , a contradiction. So y , x p and x are two non-incident subgroups of G . Since G is a Q -p-group, we see y N G ( x p ) . So x p G .□

Lemma 3.3

Let G be a Q -p-group. Then, for any a G Φ ( G ) , b G a , Φ ( G ) , we see a , b G .

Proof

Without loss of generality, we may assume d ( G ) = 3 and c G a , b . Let A = a , b , B = b , c and C = a , c . Then b A B G . By the hypotheses, [ b , a ] , [ b , c ] A B . Similarly, [ a , c ] A C G . It follows that G A and the lemma is true.□

4 Q -p-groups of even order

Theorem 4.1

Suppose that G is a non-abelian metacyclic 2-group of order 2 n . Then G is a Q -2-group if and only if G is one of the following groups:

  1. G is a minimal non-abelian 2-group;

  2. 2-groups of maximal class;

  3. a , b a 8 = b 2 n 3 = 1 , [ a , b ] = b 2 , n 6 ;

  4. a , b a 8 = b 2 n 3 = 1 , [ a , b ] = b 2 n 4 + 2 , n 6 ;

  5. a , b a 4 = b 2 n 2 = 1 , [ a , b ] = b 2 , n 5 ;

  6. a , b a 4 = b 2 n 2 = 1 , [ a , b ] = b 2 n 3 + 2 , n 5 ;

  7. a , b a 8 = b 2 n 2 = 1 , a 4 = b 2 n 3 , [ a , b ] = b 2 , n 5 .

Proof

Since G is a non-abelian metacyclic 2-group, we see G is one of the groups listed in Lemma 2.6.

If G is a group listed in (1) in Lemma 2.6, then G is of maximal class or G is minimal non-abelian. So G is as given in parts (1) and (2).

If G is a group listed in (2) in Lemma 2.6, then G = a , b a 2 r + s + u = 1 , b 2 r + s + t = a 2 r + s , [ a , b ] = a 2 r with r 2 and u r . Since [ a , b 2 ] a 2 r + 1 , by Lemma 3.2, we see a 2 r + 1 b 2 . Let a 1 = a b 2 t . Then a 1 b = 1 . It is easy to see that [ a 1 2 , b ] = a 2 r + 1 . Thus, a 2 r + 1 a 1 b = 1 . So G = 2 . By Lemma 2.5, G is a minimal non-abelian 2-group.

If G is of type (3) in Lemma 2.6, then G = a , b a 2 r + s + v + t + u = 1 , b 2 r + s + t = a 2 r + s + v + t , [ a , b ] = a 2 + 2 r + v with r 2 and u 1 . It follows from [ a , b 2 ] b that s + t 1 and so s + t + u 2 . Let o ( a ) = 2 m . If s + t + u = 2 , then s + t = u = 1 . Thus, b 2 r + s + t = a 2 m 1 and [ a , b ] = a 2 + 2 m 2 . Let c = b 2 r + s + t 1 a 2 m 2 . Then c 2 = 1 . If m > 4 or r + s + t > 2 , then ( b 2 r + s + t 2 a 2 m 3 ) 2 = c . If m = 4 and r + s + t = 2 , then ( b a ) 2 = c . By Lemma 3.2, c G , which implies c Z ( G ) . However, it is impossible. So s + t + u 1 . Thus, [ a , b ] = a 2 or a 2 + 2 m 1 , b 2 r + s + t = a 2 m 1 or 1. It is easy to see that ( a b 2 ) 2 = a 2 b 4 and so a 2 b 4 G . Since [ a 2 b 4 , b ] = a 4 , we see a 4 a 2 b 4 . If b 2 r + s + t = 1 , then b 4 = 1 or b 8 = 1 . So G is as given in parts (3)–(6). If b 2 r + s + t = a 2 m 1 , then b 4 = a 2 m 1 or b 8 = a 2 m 1 . If b 8 = a 2 m 1 , then o ( a 2 m 2 b 4 ) = 2 . It follows from ( a 2 m 3 b 2 ) 2 = a 2 m 2 b 4 that a 2 m 2 b 4 , which implies a 2 m 2 b 4 Z ( G ) . However, [ a 2 m 2 b 4 , b ] 1 , a contradiction. So b 4 = a 2 m 1 and G is given in part ( 7 ) .

Conversely, every group listed in the theorem is a Q -2-group and they are pairwise non-isomorphic.□

Corollary 4.2

Let G be a Q -2-group. Then Φ ( G ) is abelian.

Proof

For any a , b G , we may assume that H = a 2 , b is not abelian and o ( a ) = 2 n . By the hypotheses, we see a 2 G and so H is metacyclic. It follows from Theorem 4.1 that [ a 2 , b ] = a 2 n 1 , a 4 or a 4 + 2 n 1 . Then, it is easy to see that [ a 2 , b 2 ] = 1 , which implies Φ ( G ) is abelian.□

Lemma 4.3

Let G be a Q -2-group and d ( G ) = 2 . If exp ( G ) = 2 , then G is one of the following groups:

  1. G is a minimal non-abelian 2-group;

  2. a , b , c a 8 = c 2 = 1 , a 4 = b 2 , [ a , b ] = c , [ c , a ] = a 4 , [ c , b ] = 1 .

Proof

If G 2 4 , then the conclusion holds by checking the list of groups of order 2 3 and 2 4 . Assume G 2 5 . If G = 2 , then by Lemma 2.5, G is a minimal non-abelian 2-group. So we may assume G > 2 , G is non-metacyclic and G = a , b with o ( a ) = 2 n , o ( b ) = 2 m , [ a , b ] = c , [ c , a ] = d . Then [ a 2 , b ] = d . By Lemma 3.2, we see d a 2 n 1 Z ( G ) . Similarly, [ c , b ] b 2 m 1 Z ( G ) . Let A = a , c and B = b , c . Noting that G is a Q -2-group, we see G A B . Since Ω 1 ( A ) = c × a 2 n 1 , G = Ω 1 ( B ) = c × a 2 n 1 . So for any x G Φ ( G ) , y G Φ ( G ) , x , we see G = Ω 1 ( c , x ) = Ω 1 ( c , y ) . It follows that x y 1 . Without loss of generality, we may assume a 2 r = b 2 t , [ c , a ] = a 2 n 1 and [ c , b ] = 1 , where r 2 .

If r t , then, by letting a 1 = a b 2 t r , we see a 1 b = 1 . If r > t > 1 or r > t , r > 2 , then, by letting b 1 = a 2 r t b , we see a b 1 = 1 . So r = 2 , t = 1 , which implies a 4 = b 2 . If n 4 , then, by letting b 1 = a 2 n 2 1 b , we also have a b 1 = 1 . If n = 3 , then o ( a ) = 8 and G is given in part ( 2 ) .□

Lemma 4.4

Let G be a non-metacyclic Q -2-group and d ( G ) = 2 . If G is cyclic with order 4, then G is one of the following groups:

  1. a , b , c a 2 n 2 = b 2 = 1 , c 2 = a 2 n 3 , [ b , a ] = c , [ c , a ] = 1 , [ c , b ] = c 2 ;

  2. a , b , c a 8 = 1 , a 4 = b 2 = c 2 , [ b , a ] = c , [ c , a ] = 1 , [ c , b ] = c 2 .

Proof

We may assume G = a , b , [ b , a ] = c , o ( a ) = 2 m , o ( b ) = 2 n , o ( c ) = 4 , [ c , a ] = 1 , [ c , b ] = 1 or c 2 . Then [ a 2 , b ] = c 2 . By Lemma 3.2, we see c 2 = a 2 m 1 .

If a b 1 , then we may assume a 2 r = b 2 t , r 2 . If r < t , then, by letting a 1 = a b 2 t r , we see a 1 b = 1 . If r t > 2 or r > t = 2 or r 3 , t = 1 , then, by letting b 1 = a 2 r t b , we see a b 1 = 1 .

If r = 2 , t = 1 , then, by letting b 1 = a 2 b , we see b 1 2 = c 2 = a 2 m 1 . We may assume m 1 = 2 and so a 4 = b 2 = c 2 . If [ c , b ] = 1 , then ( b c ) 2 = 1 . However, [ ( b c ) 2 , a ] = c 2 1 , a contradiction. So [ c , b ] = c 2 and G is given in part ( 2 ) .

If r = t = 2 , then, by letting b 1 = a 2 r t b , we see b 1 4 = c 2 . We may assume a 4 = b 1 4 = c 2 . Let A = a 2 c , b 1 2 c , B = b , a 2 c . Then A B = a 2 c . However, [ a 2 c , b ] = c 2 a 2 c , a contradiction.

Now we may assume a b = 1 . If [ c , b ] = 1 , then [ a , b 2 ] = c 2 and so c 2 b a = 1 , a contradiction. So [ c , b ] = c 2 . If o ( a ) = 8 , then a 4 = c 2 . Let A = a 2 c , b a 2 and B = b , a 2 . Then A B and B A . However, A B = b a 2 B , a contradiction. So o ( a ) 16 . Let A = a 2 n 2 c , b 2 and B = a 2 n 2 c , a 2 b . If o ( b ) > 2 , then A B and B A . However, A B A , B , a contradiction. So b 2 = 1 and we get the group in part ( 1 ) .□

According to Lemma 4.4, we have the following result:

Corollary 4.5

Let G be a Q -2-group and d ( G ) = 2 . If c ( G ) = 2 , then exp ( G ) = 2 .

Lemma 4.6

Let G be a non-metacyclic Q -2-group and d ( G ) = 2 . Then G 4 .

Proof

Otherwise, G 8 . Assume G = 2 n . Then n 6 . Let N G such that N = 2 and N G . Then, by Lemmas 2.1 and 3.1, G / N is a non-metacyclic Q -2-group. By induction, G / N 4 and so G = 8 . Set G ¯ = G / N and N = x . Then G ¯ a ¯ , b ¯ , c ¯ a ¯ 2 n 3 = b ¯ 2 = 1 ¯ , c ¯ 2 = a ¯ 2 n 4 , [ b ¯ , a ¯ ] = c ¯ , [ c ¯ , b ¯ ] = c ¯ 2 , [ c ¯ , a ¯ ] = 1 ¯ by Lemma 4.4.

If G is cyclic, then c 4 = a 2 n 3 = x and c 2 = a 2 n 4 . It follows from [ b 2 , a ] = 1 that [ c , b ] = c 2 and therefore [ c 2 , b ] = c 4 , which implies [ a 2 n 4 , b ] = a 2 n 3 . On the other hand, we see [ b , a 2 ] = c 2 and so [ b , a 4 ] = c 4 = a 2 n 3 , which implies n = 6 . Thus, c 2 = a 4 and o ( a ) = 16 . Let A = a 2 c , b a 2 and B = b , a 2 . Then A B and B A . However, A B = b a 2 B , a contradiction.

If G is not cyclic, then G = c , x . c 4 = a 2 n 3 = 1 . It follows from [ b 2 , a ] = c 2 [ c , b ] = 1 that [ c , b ] = c 2 . Since x G , we see [ c , a ] = x . Thus, [ ( b a ) 2 , a ] = [ c , a ] = x ( b a ) 2 . However, it is impossible.□

According to Lemmas 4.3, 4.4 and 4.6, we have the following results:

Theorem 4.7

Let G be a non-metacyclic Q -2-group, G = 2 n and d ( G ) = 2 . Then G is one of the following pairwise non-isomorphic groups:

  1. G is a minimal non-abelian 2-group;

  2. a , b , c a 8 = c 2 = 1 , a 4 = b 2 , [ a , b ] = c , [ c , a ] = a 4 , [ c , b ] = 1 ;

  3. a , b , c a 8 = 1 , a 4 = b 2 = c 2 , [ b , a ] = c , [ c , a ] = 1 , [ c , b ] = c 2 ;

  4. a , b , c a 2 n 2 = b 2 = 1 , c 2 = a 2 n 3 , [ b , a ] = c , [ c , a ] = 1 , [ c , b ] = c 2 .

Lemma 4.8

Let G be a Q -2-group and d ( G ) = 3 . Then G has no subgroup A such that A a , b , x a 8 = x 2 = 1 , a 4 = b 2 , [ a , b ] = x , [ x , a ] = a 4 , [ x , b ] = 1 .

Proof

Otherwise, we assume A = a , b , x a 8 = x 2 = 1 , a 4 = b 2 , [ a , b ] = x , [ x , a ] = a 4 , [ x , b ] = 1 and A G . Then [ a , x ] 1 and [ a 2 , b ] = a 4 1 . Since a 2 and x Φ ( G ) , by Corollary 4.2, we see a Φ ( G ) and b Φ ( G ) . Since d ( G ) = 3 , we may assume that there exists c G A such that G = a , b , c . Let B = a , c . Then A B G . Since a A B , we see a G A B , which implies a , x A B . Noting that A = 2 5 and a , x = 2 4 , we see A B = a , x . Thus, [ c , a ] , [ c , x ] a , x . It follows that [ c , x ] a 4 . Since [ a , x ] 1 , we see B is non-abelian. If [ a , c ] = a i x , then [ a , b c ] a . So, without loss of generality, we may assume [ a , c ] a , which implies B is metacyclic. By Theorem 4.1, we see C B ( a ) B . It follows that B = C B ( a ) x = a , c 2 , x = a , x . Thus, c a , x A , a contradiction.□

Theorem 4.9

Let G be a Q -2-group and d ( G ) 3 . Then exp ( G ) 2 .

Proof

Otherwise, exp ( G ) > 2 . Let N G such that N = 2 and N G . By Lemma 3.1, exp ( G / N ) 2 and so exp ( G ) = 4 . Then there exist a , b G such that o ( [ a , b ] ) = 4 . We may assume d ( G ) = 3 and G = a , b , c , [ a , b ] = x , [ b , c ] = y . By Corollary 4.5, x Z ( G ) . We may assume [ b , x ] 1 . If o ( y ) = 4 , then, by calculation, we see o ( [ b , a c ] ) 2 . So we may assume o ( y ) 2 . Let A = a , b and B = b , c . By Lemma 3.3, we see B G and so x B , which implies that B is non-abelian. According to Lemmas 4.3 and 4.8, b , c is minimal non-abelian. It follows from [ b , x ] 1 that B = b , x . However, it is impossible.□

Theorem 4.10

Let G be a Q -2-group and d ( G ) 3 . Then c ( G ) 2 .

Proof

For any g 1 , g 2 G , by Lemmas 4.3, 4.8 and 4.9, we see g 1 , g 2 is abelian or minimal non-abelian. We may assume d ( G ) = 3 , G = a , b , c and [ a , b ] = x . Let A = a , b and B = b , c . By Lemma 3.3, B G and so x Φ ( B ) . According to Lemma 2.5, x Z ( B ) . So x Z ( G ) and the theorem is true.□

Lemma 4.11

Let G be a non-Dedekind 2-group with d ( G ) 4 and G = 2 . Then G is a Q -2-group if and only if G is one of the following pairwise non-isomorphic groups:

  1. D 8 Q 8 ;

  2. M 2 ( 2 , 1 , 1 ) Q 8 .

Proof

Since G = 2 , there exist a , b G such that a , b is minimal non-abelian. By Lemma 2.2, a , b is isomorphic to Q 8 or M 2 ( n , m ) , n 2 or M 2 ( n , m , 1 ) with n m 1 and m + n 3 . For any x , y G , since G = 2 , we have [ x , y 2 ] = 1 , which implies Φ ( G ) Z ( G ) . So a Φ ( G ) and b Φ ( G ) . Assume d ( G ) = t + 2 . Then there exist x 1 , x 2 , , x t with o ( x i ) = 2 e i , where 1 i t , such that G = a , b , x 1 , x 2 , , x t . Without loss of generality, we may assume e 1 e 2 e t and [ x i , a ] = [ x i , b ] = 1 .

If a , b M 2 ( n , m ) , then we may assume a 2 n = b 2 m = 1 , [ a , b ] = a 2 n 1 , where n 2 . For any x i , by Lemma 3.3, we see G b , x i , where 1 i t . It follows that a 2 n 1 x i x j 1 , where 1 i , j t and i j . We may assume x i 2 s = x j 2 k , where s k 1 . If s > t 1 or s = t 2 , then, by letting x = x i 2 s t x j , we see x x i = 1 . So s = k = 2 and x 1 2 = x 2 2 = ( x 1 x 2 ) 2 . Then, for any 1 i , j t and i j , we see x i , x j Q 8 . If follows that t = 2 . If n 3 , then ( x 1 a 2 n 2 ) 2 = 1 , a contradiction. So n = 2 . If m > 1 , then, by letting A = b x 1 , a and B = b x 1 , a x 2 , we see A B A . So m = 1 and G D 8 Q 8 .

If a , b M 2 ( n , m , 1 ) , then we may assume a 2 n = b 2 m = c 2 = 1 , [ a , b ] = c , [ c , a ] = [ c , b ] = 1 , where n m 1 and m + n 3 . For any x i , by Lemma 3.3, we see G b , x i , where 1 i t . By the above, we see t = 2 and x 1 , x 2 Q 8 . Since n m 1 and m + n 3 , we see n 2 . Let A = a 2 x 1 , a 2 x 2 and B = a 2 x 1 , b . If n 3 , then A B = a 2 x 1 A . So n = 2 . Let C = a x 1 , b and D = a x 1 , b x 2 . If m = 2 , then C D = a x 1 C . So m = 2 and G M 2 ( 2 , 1 , 1 ) Q 8 .

If a , b Q 8 , then a 4 = 1 , a 2 = b 2 , [ a , b ] = a 2 . For any 1 i , j t and i j , by the above, we may assume x i , x j Q 8 or x i , x j is abelian. If x i , x j Q 8 , then x i 2 = x j 2 = a 2 . Let A = a x 1 , b and B = a x 1 , b x 2 . Then A B = a x 1 A . So x i , x j is abelian and we may assume x i x j = 1 . If a , b x i = a 2 , then a x i 2 e i 2 , b x i 2 e i 2 M 2 ( 2 , 1 ) . Thus, we may assume a , b x i = 1 , where 1 i t . Let C = a x 1 , b and D = a x 1 , x 2 . If o ( x 1 ) > 2 , then C D = a x 1 D . Thus, o ( x 1 ) = 2 and so o ( x i ) = 2 . So G is a Dedekind group, in contradiction to the hypothesis.

Conversely, every group listed in the lemma is a non-Dedekind Q -2-group and they are pairwise non-isomorphic.□

Lemma 4.12

Let G be a Q -2-group and N G Z ( G ) with N = 2 . Then the quotient group G / N is not isomorphic to M 2 ( 2 , 1 , 1 ) Q 8 .

Proof

Otherwise, we may assume N = x and G ¯ = G / N = a ¯ , b ¯ , c ¯ , d ¯ a ¯ 4 = b ¯ 2 = c ¯ 4 = d ¯ 4 = 1 ¯ , c ¯ 2 = d ¯ 2 , [ c ¯ , d ¯ ] = c ¯ 2 , [ a ¯ , b ¯ ] = c ¯ 2 , [ a ¯ , c ¯ ] = [ a ¯ , d ¯ ] = [ b ¯ , c ¯ ] = [ d ¯ , d ¯ ] = 1 ¯ . By Lemma 4.9, we see o ( c ) = o ( d ) = 4 and G = c , x C 2 × C 2 . According to Lemma 3.3, we see G c , b . If b 2 = 1 , then, since x c , b , we see [ c , b ] = x . Similarly, [ d , b ] = x and [ c d , b ] = x . However, it is impossible. So b 2 = x . Similarly, a 4 = x . By letting b 1 = b a 2 , we see b 1 2 = 1 . So we also have a contradiction.□

Theorem 4.13

Let G be a Q -2-group with d ( G ) 4 and G 2 7 . Then G is Dedekind.

Proof

Otherwise, we may assume G = 2 7 by Lemma 2.4. Let N G Z ( G ) such that N = 2 . Set G ¯ = G / N . Then, by Lemma 2.4 again, we may assume G ¯ is a non-Dedekind group. Thus, G ¯ is of the type (2) with order 2 6 in Lemma 4.11. However, it is impossible by Lemma 4.12.□

5 Q -p-groups of odd order

Lemma 5.1

Let G be a Q -p-group with d ( G ) = 2 and p > 3 . If exp ( G ) = p , then c ( G ) 3 .

Proof

We may assume G = a , b , [ a , b ] = c and [ c , a ] = d 1 . Assume A = a , c , B = b , c , C = c , d , D = a , d and o ( a ) = p n . Then, by the hypotheses, we see G A B and A C D . Now we prove A a p n 1 , d . Since [ a , d ] [ c , d ] , it is easy to see that there exists an element g A c , Φ ( A ) such that [ g , d ] = 1 . Noting that A g , d , we see A 1 ( g ) , d . Since p > 3 and c ( A ) 3 , by Lemma 2.3, we see 1 ( A ) = a p , which implies A a p n 1 , d . It follows that G a p n 1 , c , d . If d a , then G 3 Z ( G ) . So we may assume d a . Without loss of generality, we may assume [ c , b ] a p n 1 . It follows from G c , b that d Φ ( c , b ) = b p G . So d Z ( G ) , G 3 Z ( G ) and the lemma is proved.□

Theorem 5.2

Let G be a Q -3-group with d ( G ) = 2 . Then c ( G ) 3 .

Proof

We may assume G = a , b , o ( a ) = 3 n , [ a , b ] = c and [ c , a ] = d 1 . By Lemma 3.2, for any x G , we see x / x G 3 . Thus, by Lemmas 2.7 and 2.8, we see c ( G ) 4 , exp ( G ) 9 and exp ( G 3 ) 3 . Then [ c , d ] [ G 2 , G 3 ] G 5 = 1 , o ( d ) = 3 and c ( a , d ) 2 . Let A = c , d , B = a , d . Then [ a , d ] A and so [ a , d ] c 3 . Noting that G a , c , we see [ c , b ] Ω 1 ( a , c ) = a 3 n 1 , c 3 , d . Without loss of generality, we may assume [ c , b ] a i 3 n 1 c 3 j , which implies c ( c , b ) < 2 . It follows from G c , b that d Φ ( c , b ) = b 3 , c 3 G . Thus, d Z ( G ) and G 3 Z ( G ) . So c ( G ) 3 .□

Theorem 5.3

Let G be a Q -p-group and p > 2 . Then exp ( G ) p .

Proof

Suppose the result is not true and G is a counterexample of minimal order. Take x , y G with o ( x ) p and o ( y ) p . Let K = x , y . Then, by Lemma 2.3, ( x y ) p = x p y p z , where z 1 ( K ) K p . If p > 3 , then, by Lemma 5.1, 1 ( K ) K p = 1 . If p = 3 , then, by Lemma 2.7, we see c ( G ) 5 . Thus, 1 ( K ) K 3 = 1 . It follows that ( x y ) p = x p y p = 1 . So we may assume d ( G ) = 2 , G = a , b , [ a , b ] = c , L = a , c and o ( c ) p 2 . Then, according to Lemma 2.3, we see [ a p , b ] = c p w , where w 1 ( L ) L p . Since L < G , by Lemma 5.1 and Theorem 5.2, we see 1 ( L ) L p = 1 . Thus, w = 1 and so c p a . Similarly, c p b . By induction, o ( c p ) = p and so o ( c ) = p 2 .

Without loss of generality, we may assume a b = a p s = b p t , a p s = b p t and s t 2 . If s > t , then, by letting b 1 = a p s t b , we see [ a , b 1 p ] = c p and c p b 1 p . So s = t . Let b 2 = a 1 b . Then, by Lemma 2.3, we see b 2 p = a p b p g , where g 1 ( G ) G p . Then o ( g ) p and o ( b 2 ) = p s . Noting that [ a , b 2 p ] = c p , we see c p b 2 p . If s = 2 , then b 2 p Z ( G ) , a contradiction. If s > 2 , then c p = b 2 p s 1 = a p s 1 b p s 1 . It follows that a b = a p s 1 , another contradiction.□

According to Lemma 5.1 and Theorems 5.2 and 5.3, we have the following results:

Corollary 5.4

Let G be a Q -p-group with d ( G ) = 2 and p > 2 . Then c ( G ) 3 .

Theorem 5.5

Let G be a Q -p-group and p > 2 . Then c ( G ) 3 .

Proof

We may assume d ( G ) = 3 , G = a , b , c , [ a , b ] = x and [ a , x ] = y 1 . We only need to prove that [ c , y ] = 1 . Let A = a , y , B = c , y , C = x , y . Then [ c , y ] A C . It follows that [ c , y ] = 1 , which implies c ( G ) 3 .□

Theorem 5.6

Let G be a Q -p-group with d ( G ) 4 and p > 2 . Then G is abelian.

Proof

Otherwise, we may assume d ( G ) = 4 and G 1 . Let N G such that N = p and N G . Then G / N is a Q -p-group by Lemma 3.1. By induction, G / N is abelian and so G = p . Assume A < G and A is minimal non-abelian with A = a , b , a b = 1 and [ a , b ] b . Then C G ( b ) G . Assume that there exists an element g Ω 1 ( C G ( b ) ) A . Let A = a , b , B = b , g . Then, we see A B = b and b A , a contradiction. So, Ω 1 ( C G ( b ) ) A . Since Ω 1 ( A ) p 3 , by Lemma 2.9, we see Ω 1 ( C G ( b ) ) = Ω 1 ( A ) = p 3 . Then A = a , b , c a p n = b p m = c p = 1 , [ a , b ] = c , [ c , a ] = [ c , b ] = 1 is non-metacyclic with n 2 . By Lemma 2.9, we see Ω 1 ( G ) p 4 . Then there exists an element h Ω 1 ( G ) C G ( b ) . Let A = a , b , B = b , a h . Then, we see A B = b , a p n 1 A , another contradiction. Thus, the theorem is true.□

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the referee for his/her valuable suggestions and comments that contributed to the final version of this paper.

  1. Funding information: This work was supported by “The Science & Technology Development Fund of Tianjin Education Commission for Higher Education (No. 2019KJ141).”

  2. Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interests.

References

[1] Z. Janko , On maximal abelian subgroups in finite p -groups, Math. Z. 258 (2008), 629–635, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-007-0189-1 . 10.1007/s00209-007-0189-1Search in Google Scholar

[2] Z. Janko , Finite nonabelian 2-groups such that any two distinct minimal nonabelian subgroups have cyclic intersection, J. Group Theory 13 (2010), no. 4, 549–554, https://doi.org/10.1515/JGT.2010.005. Search in Google Scholar

[3] N. Blackburn , Finite groups in which the nonnormal subgroups have nontrivial intersection, J. Algebra 3 (1966), no. 1, 30–37, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8693(66)90018-4 . 10.1016/0021-8693(66)90018-4Search in Google Scholar

[4] V. I. Zenkov , Intersections of abelian subgroups in finite groups, Math. Notes 56 (1994), 869–871, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110750 . 10.1007/BF02110750Search in Google Scholar

[5] Y. Berkovich and Z. Janko , Groups of Prime Power Order, Vol. II, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2008. 10.1515/9783110208238Search in Google Scholar

[6] Y. Berkovich and Z. Janko , Groups of Prime Power Order, Vol. III, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2011. Search in Google Scholar

[7] B. Huppert , Endliche Gruppen I, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1967. 10.1007/978-3-642-64981-3Search in Google Scholar

[8] Y. Berkovich , Groups of Prime Power Order, Vol. I, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2008. 10.1515/9783110208238Search in Google Scholar

[9] M. Y. Xu , L. J. An , and Q. H. Zhang , Finite p -groups all of whose non-abelian proper subgroups are generated by two elements, J. Algebra 319 (2008), no. 9, 3603–3620, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2008.01.045. Search in Google Scholar

[10] M. Y. Xu and Q. H. Zhang , A classification of metacyclic 2-groups, Algebra Colloq. 13 (2006), no. 1, 25–34, https://doi.org/10.1142/S1005386706000058. Search in Google Scholar

[11] J. Wang and X. Y. Guo , On finite quasi-core-p p-groups, Symmetry 11 (2019), no. 9, 1147, https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11091147 . 10.3390/sym11091147Search in Google Scholar

[12] T. J. Laffey , The minimum number of generators of a finite p -group, Bull. London Math. Soc. 5 (1973), 288–290, https://doi.org/10.1112/blms/5.3.288. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-10-10
Revised: 2021-05-03
Accepted: 2021-07-05
Published Online: 2021-08-28

© 2021 Jiao Wang, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Sharp conditions for the convergence of greedy expansions with prescribed coefficients
  3. Range-kernel weak orthogonality of some elementary operators
  4. Stability analysis for Selkov-Schnakenberg reaction-diffusion system
  5. On non-normal cyclic subgroups of prime order or order 4 of finite groups
  6. Some results on semigroups of transformations with restricted range
  7. Quasi-ideal Ehresmann transversals: The spined product structure
  8. On the regulator problem for linear systems over rings and algebras
  9. Solvability of the abstract evolution equations in Ls-spaces with critical temporal weights
  10. Resolving resolution dimensions in triangulated categories
  11. Entire functions that share two pairs of small functions
  12. On stochastic inverse problem of construction of stable program motion
  13. Pentagonal quasigroups, their translatability and parastrophes
  14. Counting certain quadratic partitions of zero modulo a prime number
  15. Global attractors for a class of semilinear degenerate parabolic equations
  16. A new implicit symmetric method of sixth algebraic order with vanished phase-lag and its first derivative for solving Schrödinger's equation
  17. On sub-class sizes of mutually permutable products
  18. Asymptotic solution of the Cauchy problem for the singularly perturbed partial integro-differential equation with rapidly oscillating coefficients and with rapidly oscillating heterogeneity
  19. Existence and asymptotical behavior of solutions for a quasilinear Choquard equation with singularity
  20. On kernels by rainbow paths in arc-coloured digraphs
  21. Fully degenerate Bell polynomials associated with degenerate Poisson random variables
  22. Multiple solutions and ground state solutions for a class of generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation
  23. A note on maximal operators related to Laplace-Bessel differential operators on variable exponent Lebesgue spaces
  24. Weak and strong estimates for linear and multilinear fractional Hausdorff operators on the Heisenberg group
  25. Partial sums and inclusion relations for analytic functions involving (p, q)-differential operator
  26. Hodge-Deligne polynomials of character varieties of free abelian groups
  27. Diophantine approximation with one prime, two squares of primes and one kth power of a prime
  28. The equivalent parameter conditions for constructing multiple integral half-discrete Hilbert-type inequalities with a class of nonhomogeneous kernels and their applications
  29. Boundedness of vector-valued sublinear operators on weighted Herz-Morrey spaces with variable exponents
  30. On some new quantum midpoint-type inequalities for twice quantum differentiable convex functions
  31. Quantum Ostrowski-type inequalities for twice quantum differentiable functions in quantum calculus
  32. Asymptotic measure-expansiveness for generic diffeomorphisms
  33. Infinitesimals via Cauchy sequences: Refining the classical equivalence
  34. The (1, 2)-step competition graph of a hypertournament
  35. Properties of multiplication operators on the space of functions of bounded φ-variation
  36. Disproving a conjecture of Thornton on Bohemian matrices
  37. Some estimates for the commutators of multilinear maximal function on Morrey-type space
  38. Inviscid, zero Froude number limit of the viscous shallow water system
  39. Inequalities between height and deviation of polynomials
  40. New criteria-based ℋ-tensors for identifying the positive definiteness of multivariate homogeneous forms
  41. Determinantal inequalities of Hua-Marcus-Zhang type for quaternion matrices
  42. On a new generalization of some Hilbert-type inequalities
  43. On split quaternion equivalents for Quaternaccis, shortly Split Quaternaccis
  44. On split regular BiHom-Poisson color algebras
  45. Asymptotic stability of the time-changed stochastic delay differential equations with Markovian switching
  46. The mixed metric dimension of flower snarks and wheels
  47. Oscillatory bifurcation problems for ODEs with logarithmic nonlinearity
  48. The B-topology on S-doubly quasicontinuous posets
  49. Hyers-Ulam stability of isometries on bounded domains
  50. Inhomogeneous conformable abstract Cauchy problem
  51. Path homology theory of edge-colored graphs
  52. Refinements of quantum Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities
  53. Symmetric graphs of valency seven and their basic normal quotient graphs
  54. Mean oscillation and boundedness of multilinear operator related to multiplier operator
  55. Numerical methods for time-fractional convection-diffusion problems with high-order accuracy
  56. Several explicit formulas for (degenerate) Narumi and Cauchy polynomials and numbers
  57. Finite groups whose intersection power graphs are toroidal and projective-planar
  58. On primitive solutions of the Diophantine equation x2 + y2 = M
  59. A note on polyexponential and unipoly Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind
  60. On the type 2 poly-Bernoulli polynomials associated with umbral calculus
  61. Some estimates for commutators of Littlewood-Paley g-functions
  62. Construction of a family of non-stationary combined ternary subdivision schemes reproducing exponential polynomials
  63. On the evolutionary bifurcation curves for the one-dimensional prescribed mean curvature equation with logistic type
  64. On intersections of two non-incident subgroups of finite p-groups
  65. Global existence and boundedness in a two-species chemotaxis system with nonlinear diffusion
  66. Finite groups with 4p2q elements of maximal order
  67. Positive solutions of a discrete nonlinear third-order three-point eigenvalue problem with sign-changing Green's function
  68. Power moments of automorphic L-functions related to Maass forms for SL3(ℤ)
  69. Entire solutions for several general quadratic trinomial differential difference equations
  70. Strong consistency of regression function estimator with martingale difference errors
  71. Fractional Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for interval-valued co-ordinated convex functions
  72. Montgomery identity and Ostrowski-type inequalities via quantum calculus
  73. Universal inequalities of the poly-drifting Laplacian on smooth metric measure spaces
  74. On reducible non-Weierstrass semigroups
  75. so-metrizable spaces and images of metric spaces
  76. Some new parameterized inequalities for co-ordinated convex functions involving generalized fractional integrals
  77. The concept of cone b-Banach space and fixed point theorems
  78. Complete consistency for the estimator of nonparametric regression model based on m-END errors
  79. A posteriori error estimates based on superconvergence of FEM for fractional evolution equations
  80. Solution of integral equations via coupled fixed point theorems in 𝔉-complete metric spaces
  81. Symmetric pairs and pseudosymmetry of Θ-Yetter-Drinfeld categories for Hom-Hopf algebras
  82. A new characterization of the automorphism groups of Mathieu groups
  83. The role of w-tilting modules in relative Gorenstein (co)homology
  84. Primitive and decomposable elements in homology of ΩΣℂP
  85. The G-sequence shadowing property and G-equicontinuity of the inverse limit spaces under group action
  86. Classification of f-biharmonic submanifolds in Lorentz space forms
  87. Some new results on the weaving of K-g-frames in Hilbert spaces
  88. Matrix representation of a cross product and related curl-based differential operators in all space dimensions
  89. Global optimization and applications to a variational inequality problem
  90. Functional equations related to higher derivations in semiprime rings
  91. A partial order on transformation semigroups with restricted range that preserve double direction equivalence
  92. On multi-step methods for singular fractional q-integro-differential equations
  93. Compact perturbations of operators with property (t)
  94. Entire solutions for several complex partial differential-difference equations of Fermat type in ℂ2
  95. Random attractors for stochastic plate equations with memory in unbounded domains
  96. On the convergence of two-step modulus-based matrix splitting iteration method
  97. On the separation method in stochastic reconstruction problem
  98. Robust estimation for partial functional linear regression models based on FPCA and weighted composite quantile regression
  99. Structure of coincidence isometry groups
  100. Sharp function estimates and boundedness for Toeplitz-type operators associated with general fractional integral operators
  101. Oscillatory hyper-Hilbert transform on Wiener amalgam spaces
  102. Euler-type sums involving multiple harmonic sums and binomial coefficients
  103. Poly-falling factorial sequences and poly-rising factorial sequences
  104. Geometric approximations to transition densities of Jump-type Markov processes
  105. Multiple solutions for a quasilinear Choquard equation with critical nonlinearity
  106. Bifurcations and exact traveling wave solutions for the regularized Schamel equation
  107. Almost factorizable weakly type B semigroups
  108. The finite spectrum of Sturm-Liouville problems with n transmission conditions and quadratic eigenparameter-dependent boundary conditions
  109. Ground state sign-changing solutions for a class of quasilinear Schrödinger equations
  110. Epi-quasi normality
  111. Derivative and higher-order Cauchy integral formula of matrix functions
  112. Commutators of multilinear strongly singular integrals on nonhomogeneous metric measure spaces
  113. Solutions to a multi-phase model of sea ice growth
  114. Existence and simulation of positive solutions for m-point fractional differential equations with derivative terms
  115. Bernstein-Walsh type inequalities for derivatives of algebraic polynomials in quasidisks
  116. Review Article
  117. Semiprimeness of semigroup algebras
  118. Special Issue on Problems, Methods and Applications of Nonlinear Analysis (Part II)
  119. Third-order differential equations with three-point boundary conditions
  120. Fractional calculus, zeta functions and Shannon entropy
  121. Uniqueness of positive solutions for boundary value problems associated with indefinite ϕ-Laplacian-type equations
  122. Synchronization of Caputo fractional neural networks with bounded time variable delays
  123. On quasilinear elliptic problems with finite or infinite potential wells
  124. Deterministic and random approximation by the combination of algebraic polynomials and trigonometric polynomials
  125. On a fractional Schrödinger-Poisson system with strong singularity
  126. Parabolic inequalities in Orlicz spaces with data in L1
  127. Special Issue on Evolution Equations, Theory and Applications (Part II)
  128. Impulsive Caputo-Fabrizio fractional differential equations in b-metric spaces
  129. Existence of a solution of Hilfer fractional hybrid problems via new Krasnoselskii-type fixed point theorems
  130. On a nonlinear system of Riemann-Liouville fractional differential equations with semi-coupled integro-multipoint boundary conditions
  131. Blow-up results of the positive solution for a class of degenerate parabolic equations
  132. Long time decay for 3D Navier-Stokes equations in Fourier-Lei-Lin spaces
  133. On the extinction problem for a p-Laplacian equation with a nonlinear gradient source
  134. General decay rate for a viscoelastic wave equation with distributed delay and Balakrishnan-Taylor damping
  135. On hyponormality on a weighted annulus
  136. Exponential stability of Timoshenko system in thermoelasticity of second sound with a memory and distributed delay term
  137. Convergence results on Picard-Krasnoselskii hybrid iterative process in CAT(0) spaces
  138. Special Issue on Boundary Value Problems and their Applications on Biosciences and Engineering (Part I)
  139. Marangoni convection in layers of water-based nanofluids under the effect of rotation
  140. A transient analysis to the M(τ)/M(τ)/k queue with time-dependent parameters
  141. Existence of random attractors and the upper semicontinuity for small random perturbations of 2D Navier-Stokes equations with linear damping
  142. Degenerate binomial and Poisson random variables associated with degenerate Lah-Bell polynomials
  143. Special Issue on Fractional Problems with Variable-Order or Variable Exponents (Part I)
  144. On the mixed fractional quantum and Hadamard derivatives for impulsive boundary value problems
  145. The Lp dual Minkowski problem about 0 < p < 1 and q > 0
Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2021-0077/html
Scroll to top button