Home Refinements of quantum Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities
Article Open Access

Refinements of quantum Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities

  • Hüseyin Budak , Sundas Khan , Muhammad Aamir Ali and Yu-Ming Chu EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 30, 2021

Abstract

In this paper, we first obtain two new quantum Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for newly defined quantum integral. Then we establish several refinements of quantum Hermite-Hadamard inequalities.

MSC 2010: 26D10; 26D15; 26A51

1 Introduction

The Hermite-Hadamard inequality discovered by C. Hermite and J. Hadamard (see, e.g., [1], [2, p. 137]) is one of the most well-established inequalities in the theory of convex functions with a geometrical interpretation and many applications. These inequalities state that if f : I R is a convex function on the interval I of real numbers and ω 1 , ω 2 I with ω 1 < ω 2 , then

(1) f ω 1 + ω 2 2 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 f ( ϰ ) d ϰ f ( ω 1 ) + f ( ω 2 ) 2 .

Both inequalities hold in the reversed direction if f is concave. We note that the Hermite-Hadamard inequality may be regarded as a refinement of the concept of convexity and it follows easily from Jensen’s inequality. Hermite-Hadamard inequality for convex functions has received renewed attention in recent years, and a remarkable variety of refinements and generalizations have been studied.

On the other hand, quantum calculus, sometimes called calculus without limits, is equivalent to traditional infinitesimal calculus without the notion of limits. In the field of q -analysis, many studies have recently been carried out. It has applications in numerous areas of mathematics such as combinatorics, number theory, basic hypergeometric functions, orthogonal polynomials, and in fields of other sciences such as mechanics, theory of relativity, and quantum theory [3,4,5, 6,7]. Apparently, Euler invented this important branch of mathematics when he used the q parameter in Newton’s work on infinite series. Later, the q -calculus was first given by Jackson [3]. In 1908–1909, the general form of the q -integral and q -difference operator was defined by Jackson [6]. In 1969, for the first time Agarwal [8] defined the q -fractional derivative. In 1966–1967, Al-Salam [9] introduced a q -analog of the q -fractional integral and q -Riemann-Liouville fractional. In 2004, Rajkovic gave a definition of the Riemann-type q -integral, which was generalized to the Jackson q -integral. In 2013, Tariboon introduced the D q ω 1 -difference operator [10].

In recent years, because of the importance of convexity in numerous fields of applied and pure mathematics, it has been significantly investigated. The theory of convexity and inequalities are strongly connected to each other, therefore, various inequalities can be established in the literature which are proved for convex, generalized convex, and differentiable convex functions of single and double variables, see, for example, [10,11,12, 13,14,15, 16,17,18, 19,20,21, 22,23,24, 25,26,27, 28,29].

The general structure of this paper consists of five main sections including Introduction. In Section 2, we give some necessary important notations for concept q -calculus and we also mention some related works in the literature. In Section 3 we present some new Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for q ω 2 integrals. Some refinements of quantum Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities are proved in Section 4. We also examine the relation between our results and inequalities presented in the earlier works. Finally, in Section 5, some conclusions and further directions of research are discussed. We note that the opinion and technique of this work may inspire new research in this area.

2 Preliminaries of q -calculus and some inequalities

In this section, we present some required definitions and related inequalities about q -calculus.

We have to give the following notation which will be used many times in the following sections (see [7]):

[ n ] q = q n 1 q 1 .

Definition 1

[30] For a function F : [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] R , the q ω 1 -derivative of F at ϰ [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] is characterized by the expression:

(2) D q ω 1 F ( ϰ ) = F ( ϰ ) F ( q ϰ + ( 1 q ) ω 1 ) ( 1 q ) ( ϰ ω 1 ) , ϰ ω 1 .

If ϰ = ω 1 , we define D q ω 1 F ( ω 1 ) = lim ϰ ω 1 D q F ( ϰ ) if it exists and it is finite.

Definition 2

[18] For a function F : [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] R , the q ω 2 -derivative of F at ϰ [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] is characterized by the expression:

D q ω 2 F ( ϰ ) = F ( q ϰ + ( 1 q ) ω 2 ) F ( ϰ ) ( 1 q ) ( ω 2 ϰ ) , ϰ ω 2 .

If ϰ = ω 2 , we define D q ω 2 F ( ω 2 ) = lim ϰ ω 2 D q ω 2 F ( ϰ ) if it exists and it is finite.

Definition 3

[30] Let F : [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] R be a function. Then, the q ω 1 -definite integral on [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] is defined as

ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 1 ϰ = ( 1 q ) ( ω 2 ω 1 ) n = 0 q n F ( q n ω 2 + ( 1 q n ) ω 1 ) = ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 0 1 F ( ( 1 t ) ω 1 + t ω 2 ) d q t .

In [10], Alp et al. proved the following q ω 1 -Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for convex functions in the setting of quantum calculus:

Theorem 1

Let F : [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] R be a convex differentiable function on [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] and 0 < q < 1 . Then q -Hermite-Hadamard inequalities are as follows:

(3) F q ω 1 + ω 2 [ 2 ] q 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 1 ϰ q F ( ω 1 ) + F ( ω 2 ) [ 2 ] q .

On the other hand, Bermudo et al. gave the following new definition and were able to prove the corresponding Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities:

Definition 4

[18] Let F : [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] R be a function. Then, the q ω 2 -definite integral on [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] is defined as

ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ = ( 1 q ) ( ω 2 ω 1 ) n = 0 q n F ( q n ω 1 + ( 1 q n ) ω 2 ) = ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 0 1 F ( t ω 1 + ( 1 t ) ω 2 ) d q t .

Theorem 2

[31] We have the following identities for q ω 2 -integrals:

  1. D q ω 2 ϰ ω 2 F ( t ) d q ω 2 t = F ( ϰ ) .

  2. ϰ ω 2 D q ω 2 F ( t ) d q ω 2 t = F ( ω 2 ) F ( ϰ ) .

  3. ϰ ω 2 [ F ( t ) + G ( t ) ] d q ω 2 t = ϰ ω 2 F ( t ) d q ω 2 t + ϰ ω 2 G ( t ) d q ω 2 t .

  4. ω 1 ω 2 G ( x ) D q ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ = [ F ( ϰ ) G ( ϰ ) ] ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ( q ϰ + ( 1 q ) ω 2 ) D q ω 2 G ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ .

Theorem 3

[18] Let F : [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] R be a convex function on [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] and 0 < q < 1 . Then, q -Hermite-Hadamard inequalities are as follows:

(4) F ω 1 + q ω 2 [ 2 ] q 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ F ( ω 1 ) + q F ( ω 2 ) [ 2 ] q .

3 New Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for q ω 2 -integrals

In this section, we prove two new quantum Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for q ω 2 -integrals.

Theorem 4

If F : [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] R is a convex differentiable function on [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] and 0 < q < 1 , then we have

(5) F q ω 1 + ω 2 [ 2 ] q ( 1 q ) ( ω 2 ω 1 ) [ 2 ] q F q ω 1 + ω 2 [ 2 ] q 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ F ( ω 1 ) + q F ( ω 2 ) [ 2 ] q .

Proof

We can write the equation of the tangent line for the function F at the point q ω 1 + ω 2 [ 2 ] q , F q ω 1 + ω 2 [ 2 ] q as follows:

h ( ϰ ) = F q ω 1 + ω 2 [ 2 ] q + F q ω 1 + ω 2 [ 2 ] q ϰ q ω 1 + ω 2 [ 2 ] q

for all ϰ [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] . Since F is a convex function, it is clear that h ( ϰ ) F ( ϰ ) for all ϰ [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] . Thus, we have

ω 1 ω 2 h ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ .

By Definition 4, we get

ω 1 ω 2 h ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ = ω 1 ω 2 F q ω 1 + ω 2 [ 2 ] q + F q ω 1 + ω 2 [ 2 ] q ϰ q ω 1 + ω 2 [ 2 ] q d q ω 2 ϰ = ( ω 2 ω 1 ) F q ω 1 + ω 2 [ 2 ] q + F q ω 1 + ω 2 [ 2 ] q ω 1 ω 2 ϰ q ω 1 + ω 2 [ 2 ] q d q ω 2 ϰ = ( ω 2 ω 1 ) F q ω 1 + ω 2 [ 2 ] q + F q ω 1 + ω 2 [ 2 ] q ( 1 q ) ( ω 2 ω 1 ) n = 0 q n ( q n ω 1 + ( 1 q n ) ω 2 ) ( ω 2 ω 1 ) q ω 1 + ω 2 [ 2 ] q = ( ω 2 ω 1 ) F q ω 1 + ω 2 [ 2 ] q ( 1 q ) ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 [ 2 ] q F q ω 1 + ω 2 [ 2 ] q ,

which gives the first inequality in (5). The second inequality is the same as in Theorem 3.□

Remark 1

If we take the limit q 1 in Theorem 4, then the inequalities (5) reduce to (1).

Theorem 5

If F : [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] R is a convex differentiable function on [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] and 0 < q < 1 , then we have

(6) F ω 1 + ω 2 2 ( 1 q ) ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 [ 2 ] q F ω 1 + ω 2 2 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ F ( ω 1 ) + q F ( ω 2 ) [ 2 ] q .

Proof

Similar way as in Theorem 4, we can write tangent line for the function F at the point ω 1 + ω 2 2 , F ω 1 + ω 2 2 as follows:

k ( ϰ ) = F ω 1 + ω 2 2 + F ω 1 + ω 2 2 ϰ ω 1 + ω 2 2

for all ϰ [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] . Since F is a convex function, we get

ω 1 ω 2 k ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ .

By Definition 4, we get

ω 1 ω 2 k ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ = ω 1 ω 2 F ω 1 + ω 2 2 + F ω 1 + ω 2 2 ϰ ω 1 + ω 2 2 d q ω 2 ϰ = ( ω 2 ω 1 ) F ω 1 + ω 2 2 + F ω 1 + ω 2 2 ω 1 ω 2 ϰ ω 1 + ω 2 2 d q ω 2 ϰ = ( ω 2 ω 1 ) F ω 1 + ω 2 2 + F ω 1 + ω 2 2 ( 1 q ) ( ω 2 ω 1 ) n = 0 q n ( q n ω 1 + ( 1 q n ) ω 2 ) ( ω 2 ω 1 ) ω 1 + ω 2 2 = ( ω 2 ω 1 ) F ω 1 + ω 2 2 ( 1 q ) ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 2 [ 2 ] q F ω 1 + ω 2 2 .

This gives the first inequality in (6). The second inequality is the same as in Theorem 3.□

Remark 2

If we take the limit q 1 in Theorem 5, then the inequalities (6) reduce to (1).

Lemma 1

Let F : [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] R be a convex continuous function on [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] and 0 < q < 1 . Then we have

F 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 ( t ϰ + ( 1 t ) y ) d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ( t ϰ + ( 1 t ) y ) d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y .

Proof

Lemma 1 follows directly from Definition 3 and quantum Jensen’s inequality.□

4 Main results

In this section, we present the refinements of quantum Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for q ω 2 -integrals.

Theorem 6

Let F : [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] R be a convex continuous function on [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] and 0 < q < 1 . Then we have

(7) F ω 1 + q ω 2 [ 2 ] q 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ( t ϰ + ( 1 t ) y ) d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ F ( ω 1 ) + q F ( ω 2 ) [ 2 ] q

for all t [ 0 , 1 ] .

Proof

Since F is convex on [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] , it follows that

(8) F ( t ϰ + ( 1 t ) y ) t F ( ϰ ) + ( 1 t ) F ( y )

for all ϰ , y [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] and t [ 0 , 1 ] . Taking double q ω 2 -integration on both sides of (8) on [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] × [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] , we obtain

ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ( t ϰ + ( 1 t ) y ) d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 [ t F ( ϰ ) + ( 1 t ) F ( y ) ] d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y = t ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y + ( 1 t ) ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ( y ) d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y = t ( ω 2 ω 1 ) ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ + ( 1 t ) ( ω 2 ω 1 ) ω 1 ω 2 F ( y ) d q ω 2 y = ( ω 2 ω 1 ) ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ ,

which proves the second part of (7). On the other hand, by Lemma 1, we have

(9) F 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 ( t ϰ + ( 1 t ) y ) d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ( t ϰ + ( 1 t ) y ) d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y

and we also get

(10) 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 ( t ϰ + ( 1 t ) y ) d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y = ω 1 + q ω 2 [ 2 ] q .

By (9) and (10), we have the first part of (7).□

Remark 3

If we take the limit q 1 in Theorem 6, then the inequalities (7) reduce to the following inequalities:

F ω 1 + ω 2 2 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ( t ϰ + ( 1 t ) y ) d ϰ d y 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d ϰ F ( ω 1 ) + F ( ω 2 ) 2 ,

which are given by Dragomir in [32].

Corollary 1

Under assumptions of Theorem 6 with t = 1 2 , we have the inequalities

(11) F q ω 2 + ω 1 [ 2 ] q 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ϰ + y 2 d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ q F ( ω 2 ) + F ( ω 1 ) [ 2 ] q .

Remark 4

If we take the limit q 1 in Corollary 1, then (11) reduces to the inequalities

F ω 1 + ω 2 2 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ϰ + y 2 d ϰ d y 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d ϰ F ( ω 1 ) + F ( ω 2 ) 2 ,

which are given in [33].

Theorem 7

Let F : [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] R be a convex continuous function on [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] and 0 < q < 1 . Then we have

(12) 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F q ϰ + y [ 2 ] q d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 0 1 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ( t ϰ + ( 1 t ) y ) d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y d q ω 2 t 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ .

Proof

Let us consider the mapping ϕ : [ 0 , 1 ] R defined by

ϕ ( t ) = 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ( t ϰ + ( 1 t ) y ) d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y .

For all t 1 , t 2 [ 0 , 1 ] and α , β 0 with α + β = 1 , by convexity of F , we have

ϕ ( α t 1 + β t 2 ) = 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ( α t 1 + β t 2 ) ϰ + ( 1 ( α t 1 + β t 2 ) ) y ) d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y = 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ( α ( t 1 ϰ + ( 1 t 1 ) y ) + β ( t 2 ϰ + ( 1 t 2 ) y ) ) d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y α ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ( t 1 ϰ + ( 1 t 1 ) y ) d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y + β ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ( t 2 ϰ + ( 1 t 2 ) y ) d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y = α ϕ ( t 1 ) + β ϕ ( t 2 ) ,

which shows that ϕ is convex on [ 0 , 1 ] . By applying Theorem 3 for the convex function ϕ on [ 0 , 1 ] , we have the inequalities

ϕ q [ 2 ] q 0 1 ϕ ( t ) d q 1 t ϕ ( 0 ) + q ϕ ( 1 ) [ 2 ] q .

That is,

1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F q ϰ + y [ 2 ] q d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 0 1 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ( t ϰ + ( 1 t ) y ) d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y d q 1 t 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ .

This completes the proof.□

Remark 5

If we take the limit q 1 in Theorem 7, then the inequalities (12) reduce to the inequalities

1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ϰ + y 2 d ϰ d y 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 0 1 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ( t ϰ + ( 1 t ) y ) d ϰ d y d t 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d ϰ ,

which are given in [33].

Theorem 8

Let F : [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] R be a q -differentiable convex continuous function and 0 < q < 1 . Then the inequalities

(13) 0 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ( t ϰ + ( 1 t ) y ) d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y t q F ( ω 1 ) + F ( ω 2 ) [ 2 ] q 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( q ϰ + ( 1 q ) ω 2 ) d q ω 2 ϰ

are valid for all t [ 0 , 1 ] .

Proof

Since F is convex on [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] , it follows that

(14) F ( t ϰ + ( 1 t ) y ) t F ( ϰ ) + ( 1 t ) F ( y )

for all ϰ , y [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] and t [ 0 , 1 ] . Taking double q ω 2 -integration on both sides of (14) on [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] × [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] , we obtain

ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ( t ϰ + ( 1 t ) y ) d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 [ t F ( ϰ ) + ( 1 t ) F ( y ) ] d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y = ( ω 2 ω 1 ) ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ ,

which gives the first part of (13). On the other hand, since F is q -differentiable convex on [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] and F D q ω 2 F , we have

F ( t ϰ + ( 1 t ) y ) F ( y ) t ( ϰ y ) D q ω 2 F ( y )

for all ϰ , y [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] and t [ 0 , 1 ] . Taking double q ω 2 -integration on both sides of the above inequality on [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] × [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] , we obtain

(15) ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ( t ϰ + ( 1 t ) y ) d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y ( ω 2 ω 1 ) ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ t ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 ( ϰ y ) D q ω 2 F ( y ) d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y .

By (iv) of Theorem 2, we have

ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 ( ϰ y ) F D q ω 2 F ( y ) d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y = ( ω 2 ω 1 ) ω 1 ω 2 a + q b [ 2 ] q y D q ω 2 F ( y ) d q ω 2 y = ( ω 2 ω 1 ) a + q b [ 2 ] q y F ( y ) ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ( q y + ( 1 q ) b ) D q ω 2 a + q b 1 + q y d q ω 2 y = ( ω 2 ω 1 ) ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 q F ( ω 1 ) + F ( ω 2 ) [ 2 ] q .

It follows from (15) that

( ω 2 ω 1 ) ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ( t ϰ + ( 1 t ) y ) d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y t ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 q F ( ω 1 ) + F ( ω 2 ) [ 2 ] q ( ω 2 ω 1 ) ω 1 ω 2 F ( q ϰ + ( q 1 ) ω 2 ) d q ω 2 ϰ ,

for all t [ 0 , 1 ] , which is the second part of (13).□

Remark 6

If we take the limit q 1 in Theorem 8, then the inequalities (13) reduce to the inequalities

0 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d ϰ 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ( t ϰ + ( 1 t ) y ) d ϰ d y t F ( ω 1 ) + F ( ω 2 ) 2 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d ϰ ,

which can be seen in [33,34].

Corollary 2

Under assumptions of Theorem 8 with t = 1 2 , we have the inequalities

(16) 0 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ϰ + y 2 d q ω 2 ϰ d q ω 2 y 1 2 q F ( ω 1 ) + F ( ω 2 ) [ 2 ] q 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( q ϰ + ( 1 q ) ω 2 ) d q ω 2 ϰ .

Remark 7

If we take the limit q 1 in Corollary 2, then the inequalities (16) reduce to the inequalities

0 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d ϰ 1 ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 F ϰ + y 2 d ϰ d y 1 2 F ( ω 1 ) + F ( ω 2 ) 2 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d ϰ ,

which are given in [33].

Theorem 9

Let F : [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] R be a q -differentiable convex continuous function which is defined at the point ω 1 + q ω 2 [ 2 ] q ( ω 1 , ω 2 ) and 0 < q < 1 . Then the following inequalities hold:

(17) 0 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F t ϰ + ( 1 t ) q ω 2 + ω 1 [ 2 ] q d q ω 2 ϰ ( 1 t ) q F ( ω 1 ) + F ( ω 2 ) [ 2 ] q 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( q ϰ + ( 1 q ) ω 2 ) d q ω 2 ϰ .

Proof

Since F is convex on [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] , by Theorem 3, it follows that

1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ = t ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ + 1 t ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ t ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ + ( 1 t ) F ω 1 + q ω 2 [ 2 ] q 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F t ϰ + ( 1 t ) ω 1 + q ω 2 [ 2 ] q d q ω 2 ϰ

for all t [ 0 , 1 ] , which becomes the first part of (17). On the other hand, since F is q -differentiable convex on [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] , we have

F t ϰ + ( 1 t ) ω 1 + q ω 2 [ 2 ] q F ( ϰ ) ( 1 t ) ω 1 + q ω 2 [ 2 ] q ϰ D q ω 2 F ( ϰ ) .

Taking the q ω 2 -integration on the above inequality on [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] , we obtain

(18) 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F t ϰ + ( 1 t ) ω 1 + q ω 2 [ 2 ] q d q ω 2 ϰ 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 ( 1 t ) ω 1 + q ω 2 [ 2 ] q ϰ D q ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ .

We also have

(19) ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 + q ω 2 [ 2 ] q ϰ ω 2 D q F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ = ω 1 ω 2 F ( q ϰ + ( 1 q ) ω 2 ) ω 2 d q ϰ ( ω 2 ω 1 ) q F ( ω 1 ) + F ( ω 2 ) [ 2 ] q .

From (18) and (19), we get the second part of (17).□

Theorem 10

Let F : [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] R be a q -differentiable convex continuous function which is defined at the point q ω 1 + ω 2 [ 2 ] q ( ω 1 , ω 2 ) and 0 < q < 1 . Then the inequalities

(20) ( 1 t ) ( 1 q ) ( ω 2 ω 1 ) [ 2 ] q F q ω 1 + ω 2 [ 2 ] q 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F t ϰ + ( 1 t ) q ω 1 + ω 2 [ 2 ] q d q ω 2 ϰ ( 1 t ) q F ( ω 2 ) + F ( ω 1 ) [ 2 ] q 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( q ϰ + ( 1 q ) ω 2 ) d q ω 2 ϰ

are valid for all t [ 0 , 1 ] .

Proof

The proof of this theorem follows a similar procedure to that in Theorem 9 by using Theorem 4.□

Theorem 11

Let F : [ ω 1 , ω 2 ] R be a q -differentiable convex continuous function which is defined at the point ω 1 + ω 2 2 ( ω 1 , ω 2 ) and 0 < q < 1 . Then the inequalities

(21) ( 1 t ) ( 1 q ) ( ω 2 ω 1 ) 2 ( [ 2 ] q ) F ω 1 + ω 2 2 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d q ω 2 ϰ 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F t ϰ + ( 1 t ) ω 1 + ω 2 2 d q ω 2 ϰ ( 1 t ) F ( ω 1 ) + F ( ω 2 ) 2 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( q ϰ + ( 1 q ) ω 2 ) d q ω 2 ϰ

are valid for all t [ 0 , 1 ] .

Proof

The proof of this theorem follows a similar procedure to that in Theorem 9 by using Theorem 5.□

Remark 8

If we take the limit q 1 , then the inequalities (17), (20) and (21) reduce to

0 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d ϰ 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F t ϰ + ( 1 t ) ω 1 + ω 2 2 d ϰ ( 1 t ) F ( ω 1 ) + F ( ω 2 ) 2 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 1 ω 2 F ( ϰ ) d ϰ ,

which are given in [33].

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

  1. Funding information: This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11971241).

  2. Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the writing of this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  3. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this paper as no data sets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

[1] S. S. Dragomir and C. E. M. Pearce, Selected Topics on Hermite-Hadamard Inequalities and Applications, RGMIA Monographs, Victoria University, 2000. Search in Google Scholar

[2] J. E. Pečarić, F. Proschan, and Y. L. Tong, Convex Functions, Partial Orderings and Statistical Applications, Academic Press, Boston, 1992. Search in Google Scholar

[3] T. Ernst, The History of q-Calculus and New Method, Department of Mathematics, Uppsala University, Sweden, 2000. Search in Google Scholar

[4] T. Ernst, A Comprehensive Treatment of q-Calculus, Springer, Basel, 2012. 10.1007/978-3-0348-0431-8Search in Google Scholar

[5] H. Gauchman, Integral inequalities in q-calculus, Comput. Math. Appl. 47 (2004), 281–300. 10.1016/S0898-1221(04)90025-9Search in Google Scholar

[6] F. H. Jackson, On a q-definite integrals, Quarterly J. Pure Appl. Math. 41 (1910), 193–203. Search in Google Scholar

[7] V. Kac and P. Cheung, Quantum Calculus, Springer, 2001. 10.1007/978-1-4613-0071-7Search in Google Scholar

[8] R. Agarwal, A propos d’une note de M. Pierre Humbert, C. R. Acad. Sci. 236 (1953), no. 21, 2031–2032. Search in Google Scholar

[9] W. Al-Salam, Some fractional q-integrals and q-derivatives, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 15 (1966/1967), no. 2, 135–140. 10.1017/S0013091500011469Search in Google Scholar

[10] N. Alp, M. Z. Sarikaya, M. Kunt, and I. Iscan, q-Hermite-Hadamard inequalities and quantum estimates for midpoint type inequalities via convex and quasi-convex functions, J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 30 (2018), no. 2, 193–203. 10.1016/j.jksus.2016.09.007Search in Google Scholar

[11] M. A. Ali, H. Budak, Z. Zhang, and H. Yildirim, Some new Simpson’s type inequalities for co-ordinated convex functions in quantum calculus, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 44 (2021), no. 6, 4514–4540, https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.7048. Search in Google Scholar

[12] M. A. Ali, H. Budak, M. Abbas, and Y.-M. Chu, Quantum Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for functions with convex absolute values of second qb-derivatives, Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021 (2021), 7, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03163-1. Search in Google Scholar

[13] M. A. Ali, Y.-M. Chu, H. Budak, A. Akkurt, and H. Yildrim, New quantum boundaries for quantum Simpson’s and quantum Newton’s type inequalities for preinvex functions, Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021 (2021), 64, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03226-x. Search in Google Scholar

[14] M. A. Ali, M. Abbas, H. Budak, P. Agarwal, G. Murtaza, and Y.-M. Chu, Quantum variant of Montgomery identity and Ostrowski-type inequalities for the mappings of two variables, Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021 (2021), 25, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03195-7. 10.1186/s13662-020-03195-7Search in Google Scholar

[15] M. A. Ali, N. Alp, H. Budak, Y.-M. Chu, and Z. Zhang, On some new quantum midpoint type inequalities for twice quantum differentiable convex functions, Open Math. 19 (2021), 427–439, https://doi.org/10.1515/math-2021-0015. 10.1515/math-2021-0015Search in Google Scholar

[16] M. A. Ali, H. Budak, A. Akkurt, and Y.-M. Chu, Quantum Ostrowski type inequalities for twice quantum differentiable functions in quantum calculus, Open Math. 19 (2021), 440–449, https://doi.org/10.1515/math-2021-0020. 10.1515/math-2021-0020Search in Google Scholar

[17] N. Alp and M. Z. Sarikaya, Hermite-Hadamard’s type inequalities for co-ordinated convex functions on quantum integral, Appl. Math. E-Notes 20 (2020), 341–356.10.1186/s13660-020-02442-5Search in Google Scholar

[18] S. Bermudo, P. Kórus, and J. N. Valdés, On q-Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for general convex functions, Acta Math. Hungar. 162 (2020), 364–374, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10474-020-01025-6. Search in Google Scholar

[19] H. Budak, M. A. Ali, and M. Tarhanaci, Some new q-Hermite-Hadamard like inequalities for coordinated convex functions, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 186 (2020), no. 3, 899–910, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-020-01726-6. Search in Google Scholar

[20] H. Budak, S. Erden, and M. A. Ali, Simpson and Newton type inequalities for convex functions via newly defined quantum integrals, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 44 (2021), 378–390, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mma.6742. Search in Google Scholar

[21] H. Budak, M. A. Ali, and T. Tunc, Quantum Ostrowski-type integral inequalities for functions of two variables, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 44 (2021), no. 7, 5857–5872, https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.7153. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Y.-M. Chu, M. U. Awan, S. Talib, M. A. Noor, and K. I Noor, New post quantum analogues of Ostrowski-type inequalities using new definitions of left-right (p, q)-derivatives and definite integrals, Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020 (2020), 634, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03094-x. Search in Google Scholar

[23] M. A. Noor, K. I. Noor, and M. U. Awan, Some quantum estimates for Hermite-Hadamard inequalities, Appl. Math. Comput. 251 (2015), 675–679, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.11.090. Search in Google Scholar

[24] M. A. Noor, K. I. Noor, and M. U. Awan, Some quantum integral inequalities via preinvex functions, Appl. Math. Comput. 269 (2015), 242–251, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.07.078. Search in Google Scholar

[25] M. Noor, K. Noor, and M. Awan, Quantum Ostrowski inequalities for q-differentiable convex functions, J. Math. Inequal. 10 (2016), no. 4, 1013–1018, http://dx.doi.org/10.7153/jmi-10-81. Search in Google Scholar

[26] J. Prabseang, K. Nonlaopon, and J. Tariboon, Quantum Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for double integral and q-differentiable convex functions, J. Math. Inequal 13 (2019), no. 3, 675–686, http://dx.doi.org/10.7153/jmi-2019-13-45. Search in Google Scholar

[27] W. Sudsutad, S. K. Ntouyas, and J. Tariboon, Quantum integral inequalities for convex functions, J. Math. Inequal. 9 (2015), no. 3, 781–793, http://dx.doi.org/10.7153/jmi-09-64. Search in Google Scholar

[28] M. Vivas-Cortez, M. A. Ali, A. Kashuri, I. B. Sial, and Z. Zhang, Some new Newton’s type integral inequalities for co-ordinated convex functions in quantum calculus, Symmetry 12 (2020), no. 9, 1476, https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12091476. 10.3390/sym12091476Search in Google Scholar

[29] H. Zhuang, W. Liu, and J. Park, Some quantum estimates of Hermite-Hadmard inequalities for quasi-convex functions, Mathematics 7 (2019), 152, http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math7020152. Search in Google Scholar

[30] J. Tariboon and S. K. Ntouyas, Quantum calculus on finite intervals and applications to impulsive difference equations, Adv. Differ. Equ. 2013 (2013), 282, https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2013-282. Search in Google Scholar

[31] M. A. Ali, N. Alp, H. Budak, and P. Agarwal, On some new trapezoidal inequalities for qω2-quantum integrals via green function, J. Anal. (2021), in press.10.1007/s41478-021-00323-8Search in Google Scholar

[32] S. S. Dragomir, Two refinements of Hadamard’s inequalities, Coll. Sci. Pap. Fac. Kragujevac 11 (1990), 23–26. Search in Google Scholar

[33] B. G. Pachpatte, Mathematical Inequalities, vol. 67, 1st edition, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Holland, 2005. 10.1016/S0924-6509(05)80001-7Search in Google Scholar

[34] S. S. Dragomir, Some integral inequalities for differentiable convex functions, Contrib. Sec. Math. Tech. Sci. 13 (1992), 13–17. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-07-09
Revised: 2021-01-07
Accepted: 2021-01-07
Published Online: 2021-07-30

© 2021 Hüseyin Budak et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Sharp conditions for the convergence of greedy expansions with prescribed coefficients
  3. Range-kernel weak orthogonality of some elementary operators
  4. Stability analysis for Selkov-Schnakenberg reaction-diffusion system
  5. On non-normal cyclic subgroups of prime order or order 4 of finite groups
  6. Some results on semigroups of transformations with restricted range
  7. Quasi-ideal Ehresmann transversals: The spined product structure
  8. On the regulator problem for linear systems over rings and algebras
  9. Solvability of the abstract evolution equations in Ls-spaces with critical temporal weights
  10. Resolving resolution dimensions in triangulated categories
  11. Entire functions that share two pairs of small functions
  12. On stochastic inverse problem of construction of stable program motion
  13. Pentagonal quasigroups, their translatability and parastrophes
  14. Counting certain quadratic partitions of zero modulo a prime number
  15. Global attractors for a class of semilinear degenerate parabolic equations
  16. A new implicit symmetric method of sixth algebraic order with vanished phase-lag and its first derivative for solving Schrödinger's equation
  17. On sub-class sizes of mutually permutable products
  18. Asymptotic solution of the Cauchy problem for the singularly perturbed partial integro-differential equation with rapidly oscillating coefficients and with rapidly oscillating heterogeneity
  19. Existence and asymptotical behavior of solutions for a quasilinear Choquard equation with singularity
  20. On kernels by rainbow paths in arc-coloured digraphs
  21. Fully degenerate Bell polynomials associated with degenerate Poisson random variables
  22. Multiple solutions and ground state solutions for a class of generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation
  23. A note on maximal operators related to Laplace-Bessel differential operators on variable exponent Lebesgue spaces
  24. Weak and strong estimates for linear and multilinear fractional Hausdorff operators on the Heisenberg group
  25. Partial sums and inclusion relations for analytic functions involving (p, q)-differential operator
  26. Hodge-Deligne polynomials of character varieties of free abelian groups
  27. Diophantine approximation with one prime, two squares of primes and one kth power of a prime
  28. The equivalent parameter conditions for constructing multiple integral half-discrete Hilbert-type inequalities with a class of nonhomogeneous kernels and their applications
  29. Boundedness of vector-valued sublinear operators on weighted Herz-Morrey spaces with variable exponents
  30. On some new quantum midpoint-type inequalities for twice quantum differentiable convex functions
  31. Quantum Ostrowski-type inequalities for twice quantum differentiable functions in quantum calculus
  32. Asymptotic measure-expansiveness for generic diffeomorphisms
  33. Infinitesimals via Cauchy sequences: Refining the classical equivalence
  34. The (1, 2)-step competition graph of a hypertournament
  35. Properties of multiplication operators on the space of functions of bounded φ-variation
  36. Disproving a conjecture of Thornton on Bohemian matrices
  37. Some estimates for the commutators of multilinear maximal function on Morrey-type space
  38. Inviscid, zero Froude number limit of the viscous shallow water system
  39. Inequalities between height and deviation of polynomials
  40. New criteria-based ℋ-tensors for identifying the positive definiteness of multivariate homogeneous forms
  41. Determinantal inequalities of Hua-Marcus-Zhang type for quaternion matrices
  42. On a new generalization of some Hilbert-type inequalities
  43. On split quaternion equivalents for Quaternaccis, shortly Split Quaternaccis
  44. On split regular BiHom-Poisson color algebras
  45. Asymptotic stability of the time-changed stochastic delay differential equations with Markovian switching
  46. The mixed metric dimension of flower snarks and wheels
  47. Oscillatory bifurcation problems for ODEs with logarithmic nonlinearity
  48. The B-topology on S-doubly quasicontinuous posets
  49. Hyers-Ulam stability of isometries on bounded domains
  50. Inhomogeneous conformable abstract Cauchy problem
  51. Path homology theory of edge-colored graphs
  52. Refinements of quantum Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities
  53. Symmetric graphs of valency seven and their basic normal quotient graphs
  54. Mean oscillation and boundedness of multilinear operator related to multiplier operator
  55. Numerical methods for time-fractional convection-diffusion problems with high-order accuracy
  56. Several explicit formulas for (degenerate) Narumi and Cauchy polynomials and numbers
  57. Finite groups whose intersection power graphs are toroidal and projective-planar
  58. On primitive solutions of the Diophantine equation x2 + y2 = M
  59. A note on polyexponential and unipoly Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind
  60. On the type 2 poly-Bernoulli polynomials associated with umbral calculus
  61. Some estimates for commutators of Littlewood-Paley g-functions
  62. Construction of a family of non-stationary combined ternary subdivision schemes reproducing exponential polynomials
  63. On the evolutionary bifurcation curves for the one-dimensional prescribed mean curvature equation with logistic type
  64. On intersections of two non-incident subgroups of finite p-groups
  65. Global existence and boundedness in a two-species chemotaxis system with nonlinear diffusion
  66. Finite groups with 4p2q elements of maximal order
  67. Positive solutions of a discrete nonlinear third-order three-point eigenvalue problem with sign-changing Green's function
  68. Power moments of automorphic L-functions related to Maass forms for SL3(ℤ)
  69. Entire solutions for several general quadratic trinomial differential difference equations
  70. Strong consistency of regression function estimator with martingale difference errors
  71. Fractional Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for interval-valued co-ordinated convex functions
  72. Montgomery identity and Ostrowski-type inequalities via quantum calculus
  73. Universal inequalities of the poly-drifting Laplacian on smooth metric measure spaces
  74. On reducible non-Weierstrass semigroups
  75. so-metrizable spaces and images of metric spaces
  76. Some new parameterized inequalities for co-ordinated convex functions involving generalized fractional integrals
  77. The concept of cone b-Banach space and fixed point theorems
  78. Complete consistency for the estimator of nonparametric regression model based on m-END errors
  79. A posteriori error estimates based on superconvergence of FEM for fractional evolution equations
  80. Solution of integral equations via coupled fixed point theorems in 𝔉-complete metric spaces
  81. Symmetric pairs and pseudosymmetry of Θ-Yetter-Drinfeld categories for Hom-Hopf algebras
  82. A new characterization of the automorphism groups of Mathieu groups
  83. The role of w-tilting modules in relative Gorenstein (co)homology
  84. Primitive and decomposable elements in homology of ΩΣℂP
  85. The G-sequence shadowing property and G-equicontinuity of the inverse limit spaces under group action
  86. Classification of f-biharmonic submanifolds in Lorentz space forms
  87. Some new results on the weaving of K-g-frames in Hilbert spaces
  88. Matrix representation of a cross product and related curl-based differential operators in all space dimensions
  89. Global optimization and applications to a variational inequality problem
  90. Functional equations related to higher derivations in semiprime rings
  91. A partial order on transformation semigroups with restricted range that preserve double direction equivalence
  92. On multi-step methods for singular fractional q-integro-differential equations
  93. Compact perturbations of operators with property (t)
  94. Entire solutions for several complex partial differential-difference equations of Fermat type in ℂ2
  95. Random attractors for stochastic plate equations with memory in unbounded domains
  96. On the convergence of two-step modulus-based matrix splitting iteration method
  97. On the separation method in stochastic reconstruction problem
  98. Robust estimation for partial functional linear regression models based on FPCA and weighted composite quantile regression
  99. Structure of coincidence isometry groups
  100. Sharp function estimates and boundedness for Toeplitz-type operators associated with general fractional integral operators
  101. Oscillatory hyper-Hilbert transform on Wiener amalgam spaces
  102. Euler-type sums involving multiple harmonic sums and binomial coefficients
  103. Poly-falling factorial sequences and poly-rising factorial sequences
  104. Geometric approximations to transition densities of Jump-type Markov processes
  105. Multiple solutions for a quasilinear Choquard equation with critical nonlinearity
  106. Bifurcations and exact traveling wave solutions for the regularized Schamel equation
  107. Almost factorizable weakly type B semigroups
  108. The finite spectrum of Sturm-Liouville problems with n transmission conditions and quadratic eigenparameter-dependent boundary conditions
  109. Ground state sign-changing solutions for a class of quasilinear Schrödinger equations
  110. Epi-quasi normality
  111. Derivative and higher-order Cauchy integral formula of matrix functions
  112. Commutators of multilinear strongly singular integrals on nonhomogeneous metric measure spaces
  113. Solutions to a multi-phase model of sea ice growth
  114. Existence and simulation of positive solutions for m-point fractional differential equations with derivative terms
  115. Bernstein-Walsh type inequalities for derivatives of algebraic polynomials in quasidisks
  116. Review Article
  117. Semiprimeness of semigroup algebras
  118. Special Issue on Problems, Methods and Applications of Nonlinear Analysis (Part II)
  119. Third-order differential equations with three-point boundary conditions
  120. Fractional calculus, zeta functions and Shannon entropy
  121. Uniqueness of positive solutions for boundary value problems associated with indefinite ϕ-Laplacian-type equations
  122. Synchronization of Caputo fractional neural networks with bounded time variable delays
  123. On quasilinear elliptic problems with finite or infinite potential wells
  124. Deterministic and random approximation by the combination of algebraic polynomials and trigonometric polynomials
  125. On a fractional Schrödinger-Poisson system with strong singularity
  126. Parabolic inequalities in Orlicz spaces with data in L1
  127. Special Issue on Evolution Equations, Theory and Applications (Part II)
  128. Impulsive Caputo-Fabrizio fractional differential equations in b-metric spaces
  129. Existence of a solution of Hilfer fractional hybrid problems via new Krasnoselskii-type fixed point theorems
  130. On a nonlinear system of Riemann-Liouville fractional differential equations with semi-coupled integro-multipoint boundary conditions
  131. Blow-up results of the positive solution for a class of degenerate parabolic equations
  132. Long time decay for 3D Navier-Stokes equations in Fourier-Lei-Lin spaces
  133. On the extinction problem for a p-Laplacian equation with a nonlinear gradient source
  134. General decay rate for a viscoelastic wave equation with distributed delay and Balakrishnan-Taylor damping
  135. On hyponormality on a weighted annulus
  136. Exponential stability of Timoshenko system in thermoelasticity of second sound with a memory and distributed delay term
  137. Convergence results on Picard-Krasnoselskii hybrid iterative process in CAT(0) spaces
  138. Special Issue on Boundary Value Problems and their Applications on Biosciences and Engineering (Part I)
  139. Marangoni convection in layers of water-based nanofluids under the effect of rotation
  140. A transient analysis to the M(τ)/M(τ)/k queue with time-dependent parameters
  141. Existence of random attractors and the upper semicontinuity for small random perturbations of 2D Navier-Stokes equations with linear damping
  142. Degenerate binomial and Poisson random variables associated with degenerate Lah-Bell polynomials
  143. Special Issue on Fractional Problems with Variable-Order or Variable Exponents (Part I)
  144. On the mixed fractional quantum and Hadamard derivatives for impulsive boundary value problems
  145. The Lp dual Minkowski problem about 0 < p < 1 and q > 0
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2021-0029/html
Scroll to top button