Abstract
This paper reassesses the widespread claim in Hebrew linguistics that the medial third person pronoun in the “subject NP + pronoun + predicate” construction in Israeli Hebrew functions either as copula, or as a referential subject in an extrapositional sentence. Based on the examination of this construction in Hebrew conversation, as represented in The Corpus of Spoken Israeli Hebrew (CoSIH), and based on theoretical considerations, the paper argues that the distinction between copular and referential uses of medial third person pronouns is not justified, leading to the conclusion that apparent “copular” third person pronouns are in fact a second realization of the subject referent, and that sentences containing such pronouns are better viewed as cases of subject doubling. This paper positions subject doubling in the context of typology and language acquisition, and argues for the need to analyze it using natural data, focusing on speaker- and listener- oriented motivations.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Shlomo Izre’el (Tel Aviv University), Wilbert Spooren (Radboud University), Wyke Stommel (Radboud University), Mark Dingemanse (Radboud University), Pavel Ozerov (University of Münster), and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable and informative comments on previous versions of this article.
References
Alexopoulou, Theodora, Edit Doron & Caroline Heycock. 2004. Broad subjects and clitic left dislocation. In David Adger, Cécile de Cat & George Tsoulas (eds.), Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects, 329–358. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/1-4020-1910-6_14Suche in Google Scholar
Avanzi, Mathieu. 2011. La dislocation à gauche avec reprise anaphorique en français parlé: Etude prosodique. In Hi-Yon Yoo & Elisabeth Delais-Roussarie (eds.), Actes interface discours et prosodie 2009, 77–91. Paris, Septembre 2009.Suche in Google Scholar
Avanzi, Mathieu. 2012. L’interface prosodie/syntaxe en francais. Dislocations, incises et asyndètes. Brussels: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-0352-6282-7Suche in Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth Aronson. 1990. Acquiring an (S)VO language: Subjectless sentences in children’s Hebrew. Linguistics 28. 1135–1166. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1990.28.6.1135.Suche in Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth & Alexander Grosu. 1976. Aspects of the copula in Modern Hebrew. In Peter Cole (ed.), Studies in Modern Hebrew syntax and semantics (North Holland Linguistics Series 32), 265–285. Amsterdam: North Holland.Suche in Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire. 2006. Detachment constructions. In Keith Brown (ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, vol. 3, 2nd edn, 477–485. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00569-1Suche in Google Scholar
Borochovski-Bar Aba, Ester. 2009. Pronouns in spoken language – Syntactic and pragmatic study. Hebrew Linguistics 62/63. 145–182. [in Hebrew].Suche in Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald & Michael McCarthy. 1995. Grammar and the spoken language. Applied Linguistics 16(2). 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.2.141.Suche in Google Scholar
Coffin, Edna Amir & Shmuel Bolozky. 2005. A reference grammar of Modern Hebrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511811081Suche in Google Scholar
Cohen, Smadar. 2016. Person markers in spoken spontaneous Israeli Hebrew. A systematic description and analysis. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & Marjo van Koppen. 2002. Subject doubling in Dutch dialects. In Marjo van Koppen, Erica Thrift, Erik Jan van der Torre & Malte Zimmerman (eds.), Proceedings of ConSOLE IX, 54–67. Leiden: University of Leiden.Suche in Google Scholar
Danon, Gabi. 2013. Copula: Modern Hebrew. In Geoffrey Khan (ed.), Encyclopedia of Hebrew language and linguistics, vol. 1, 627–631. Leiden: Brill.Suche in Google Scholar
Dekel, Nurit. 2014. Colloquial Israeli Hebrew: A corpus-based survey (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM] 279). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110364484Suche in Google Scholar
Doron, Edit. 1983. Verbless predicates in Hebrew. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Doron, Edit & Caroline Heycock. 2003. Categorical subjects. Gengo Kenkyu 123. 95–135.Suche in Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. Cumming, Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming & Danae Paolino. 1992. Discourse transcription (Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 4). Santa Barbara, CA: Department of Linguistics, University of California, Santa Barbara.Suche in Google Scholar
Falk, Yehuda N. 2004. The Hebrew present-tense copula as a mixed category. In Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the International Lexical-Functional Grammar Conference, 226–246. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Suche in Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara. 2008. Dynamics of discourse. In Gerd Antos & Karlfried Knapp (eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (Handbooks of Applied Linguistics [HAL] 2), 255–284. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110211399.2.255Suche in Google Scholar
Geluykens, Ronald. 1992. From discourse process to grammatical construction: On left-dislocation in English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/sidag.1Suche in Google Scholar
Glinert, Lewis. 1989. The grammar of Modern Hebrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Goldenberg, Gideon. 1998. On verbal structure and the Hebrew verb. In Studies in semitic linguistics: Selected writings, 138–147. Jerusalem: Magnes Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Haugereid, Petter, Nurit Melnik & Shuly Wintner. 2013. Nonverbal predicates in Modern Hebrew. In Stefan Muller (ed.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Freie Universität Berlin August 26–29, 2013, 69–89. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.10.21248/hpsg.2013.4Suche in Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders & Urpo Nikanne. 2008. Subject doubling in Finnish: The role of deficient pronouns. In Sjef Barbiers, Olaf Koeneman, Marika Lekakou & Margreet van der Ham (eds.), Microvariation in syntactic doubling (Syntax and Semantics, Volume 36), 325–349. Amsterdam: Brill.10.1163/9781848550216_013Suche in Google Scholar
Izre’el, Shlomo. 2002. The corpus of Spoken Israeli Hebrew: Textual samples. Leshonénu 64. 289–314.Suche in Google Scholar
Izre’el, Shlomo. 2012a. Basic sentence structures: A view from Spoken Israeli Hebrew. In Sandrine Caddéo, Marie-Noëlle Roubaud, Magali Rouquier & Frédéric Sabio (eds.), Penser les langues avec Claire Blanche-Benveniste (Langues et Langage 20), 215–227. Aix-en-Provence: Presses Universitaires de Provence.Suche in Google Scholar
Izre’el, Shlomo. 2012b. Sentence structure in spoken Hebrew. In Malka Muchnik & Zvi Sadan (eds.), Studies in Modern Hebrew and Jewish languages presented to Ora (Rodrigue) Schwarzwald, 401–418. Jerusalem: Carmel. [in Hebrew].Suche in Google Scholar
Izre’el, Shlomo. 2020. The basic unit of spoken language and the interfaces between prosody, discourse and syntax: A view from spontaneous spoken Hebrew. In Shlomo Izre’el, Heliana Mello, Alessandro Panunzi & Tommaso Rasso (eds.), In search of basic units of spoken language: A corpus-driven approach (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 94), 77–105. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.94.02izrSuche in Google Scholar
Khan, Geoffrey. 2016. Left dislocation in North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic dialects. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus 50. 91–110. https://doi.org/10.5842/50-0-718.Suche in Google Scholar
Kibrik, Andrej A. 2011. Reference in discourse (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199215805.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Kuzar, Ron. 2012. Sentence patterns in English and Hebrew (Constructional Approaches to Language 12). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.12Suche in Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1977. A mechanism for the development of copula morphemes. In Charles Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, 414–444. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.10.7560/750357-012Suche in Google Scholar
Matić, Dejan, Saskia van Putten & Jeremy Hammond. 2016. Integrated and non-integrated left-dislocations: A comparative study of LD in Avatime, Tundra Yukaghir & Whitesands. In Jens Fleischhauer, Anja Latrouite & Rainer Osswald (eds.), Explorations of the syntax-semantics interface (Studies in Language and Cognition 3), 343–371. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.10.1515/9783110720297-013Suche in Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron & Leora Schiff. 2005. Spoken Israeli Hebrew revisited: Structures and variation. Studia Semitica 16. 145–191.Suche in Google Scholar
Miller, Jim & Regina Weinert. 1998. Spontaneous spoken language: Syntax and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198236566.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Muraoka, Takamitsu. 1999. The tripartite nominal sentence revisited. In Cynthia L. Miller (ed.), The verbless sentence in Biblical Hebrew: Linguistic approaches, 187–214. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.10.5325/j.ctv1bxh3hg.12Suche in Google Scholar
Nadasdi, Terry. 1995. Subject NP doubling, matching and minority French. Language Variation and Change 7. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394500000879.Suche in Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia & Christina Tortora. 2016. Subject clitics: syntax. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 772–785. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0047Suche in Google Scholar
Pustet, Regina. 2003. Copulas: Universals in the categorization of the lexicon (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199258505.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
van Putten, Saskia. 2014. Information structure in Avatime. Nijmegen: Radboud University dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Rosén, Haiim. 1957. Ivrit Tova: Iyunim Betaxbir [Good Hebrew: studies in syntax]. Jerusalem: kiryat sefer.Suche in Google Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph. 2006. Coming to terms with conversational grammar. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11(4). 385–409. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.11.4.03ruh.Suche in Google Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo. 2003. Enclitic subject pronouns in the Romance languages. In Christina Tortora (ed.), The syntax of Italian dialects (Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax), 207–228. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195136456.003.0009Suche in Google Scholar
Silber-Varod, Vered. 2013. The SpeeCHain perspective: Form and function of prosodic boundary tones in spontaneous spoken Hebrew. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing.10.1075/la.215.10silSuche in Google Scholar
Spector Shirtz, Ilona. 2014. The syntax of non-verbal predication in Modern Hebrew: Predicate nominals, pseudoclefts, and clefts. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon. 1997. Intransitive predication (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory). Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oso/9780198236931.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Stoop, Wessel. 2011. CLD, dat is niet contrastief. Tabu 39(1/2). 49–61.Suche in Google Scholar
Wendy, Elvira-García. 2017. Create pictures with tiers v.4.4. Praat script. Available at: http://stel.ub.edu/labfon/en/praat-scripts.Suche in Google Scholar
Zewi, Tamar. 1996. The definition of the copula and the role of 3rd independent personal pronouns in nominal sentences of Semitic languages. Folia Linguistica Historica 17. 41–55.10.1515/flih.1996.17.1-2.41Suche in Google Scholar
Zewi, Tamar. 2013. Nominal Sentence. In Geoffrey Khan (ed.), Encyclopedia of Hebrew language and linguistics, vol. 2, 830–839. Leiden: Brill.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Postnominal relative clauses in Chinese
- Outlining a grammaticalization path for the Spanish formula en plan (de): A contribution to crosslinguistic pragmatics
- From connective construction to final particle: The emergence of the Korean disapproval marker hakonun
- Complex predicates, simple inflecting verbs, and “uninflecting verbs” in Pre-Basque
- What makes up a reportable event in a language? Motion events as an important test domain in linguistic typology
- Words are constructions, too: A construction-based approach to English ablaut reduplication
- Oblique nominals, a verbal affix and late merge
- Experimental evidence supporting the overlapping distribution of core and exempt anaphors: Re-examination of long-distance bound caki-casin in Korean
- Reassessing the third person pronominal “copula” in spoken Israeli Hebrew
- Domain restriction in child Mandarin: Implications for quantifier spreading
- Nouns and verbs in the speech signal: Are there phonetic correlates of grammatical category?
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Postnominal relative clauses in Chinese
- Outlining a grammaticalization path for the Spanish formula en plan (de): A contribution to crosslinguistic pragmatics
- From connective construction to final particle: The emergence of the Korean disapproval marker hakonun
- Complex predicates, simple inflecting verbs, and “uninflecting verbs” in Pre-Basque
- What makes up a reportable event in a language? Motion events as an important test domain in linguistic typology
- Words are constructions, too: A construction-based approach to English ablaut reduplication
- Oblique nominals, a verbal affix and late merge
- Experimental evidence supporting the overlapping distribution of core and exempt anaphors: Re-examination of long-distance bound caki-casin in Korean
- Reassessing the third person pronominal “copula” in spoken Israeli Hebrew
- Domain restriction in child Mandarin: Implications for quantifier spreading
- Nouns and verbs in the speech signal: Are there phonetic correlates of grammatical category?