Startseite Maternal and neonatal complications in pregnancies with and without pre-gestational diabetes mellitus
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Maternal and neonatal complications in pregnancies with and without pre-gestational diabetes mellitus

  • Rebecca Karkia , Tara Giacchino , Helen Watson , Andrew Gough , Ghada Ramadan und Ranjit Akolekar ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 7. September 2023

Abstract

Objectives

To compare pregnancy complications in pregnancies with and without pre-gestational diabetes mellitus (DM) managed in a multidisciplinary high-risk diabetes antenatal clinic.

Methods

This screening cohort study was undertaken at a large maternity unit in the United Kingdom between January 2010 and December 2022. We included singleton pregnancies that booked at our unit at 11–13 weeks’ gestation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to determine risks of complications in pregnancies with type 1 and type 2 DM after adjusting for maternal and pregnancy characteristics. Effect sizes were expressed as absolute risks (AR) and odds ratio (OR) (95 % confidence intervals [CI]).

Results

The study population included 53,649 singleton pregnancies, including 509 (1.0 %) with pre-existing DM and 49,122 (99.0 %) without diabetes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that there was a significant contribution from pre-existing DM in prediction of adverse outcomes, including antenatal complications such as fetal defects, stillbirth, preterm delivery, polyhydramnios, preeclampsia and delivery of large for gestational age (LGA) neonates; intrapartum complications such as caesarean delivery (CS) and post-partum haemorrhage; and neonatal complications including admission to neonatal intensive care unit, hypoglycaemia, jaundice and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE). In particular, there was a 5-fold increased risk of stillbirth and HIE.

Conclusions

The maternal and neonatal complications in pregnancies with pre-existing DM are significantly increased compared to those without DM despite a decade of intensive multidisciplinary antenatal care. Further research is required to investigate strategies and interventions to prevent morbidity and mortality in pregnancies with pre-gestational DM.


Corresponding author: Professor Ranjit Akolekar, MD, MRCOG, Institute of Medical Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Kent, UK; and Medway Fetal and Maternal Medicine Centre, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, Kent ME7 5NY, UK, E-mail:

  1. Ethical approval: The protocol for this study was approved by National Research Ethics Committee (REC reference number 20/HRA/3076).

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  5. Research funding: None declared.

References

1. Casson, IF, Clarke, CA, Howard, CV, McKendrick, O, Pennycook, S, Pharoah, PO, et al.. Outcomes of pregnancy in insulin dependent diabetic women: results of a five year population cohort study. BMJ 1997;315:275–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7103.275.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Yang, J, Cummings, EA, O’connell, C, Jangaard, K. Fetal and neonatal outcomes of diabetic pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:644–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000231688.08263.47.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Wahabi, HA, Esmaeil, SA, Fayed, A, Al-Shaikh, G, Alzeidan, RA. Pre-existing diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes. BMC Res Notes 2012;5:496. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-496.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Correa, A, Gilboa, SM, Besser, LM, Botto, LD, Moore, CA, Hobbs, CA, et al.. Diabetes mellitus and birth defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:237.e1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.028.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Diabetes care and research in europe: the Saint Vincent declaration. Diabet Med 1990;7:360.10.1111/j.1464-5491.1990.tb01405.xSuche in Google Scholar

6. Department of Health National service framework for diabetes: standards. London: Department of Health; 2001.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health. Pregnancy in women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in 2002–03, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. London: CEMACH; 2005.Suche in Google Scholar

8. National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health (UK). Diabetes in pregnancy: management of diabetes and its complications from preconception to the postnatal period. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2008.Suche in Google Scholar

9. National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health (UK). Diabetes in pregnancy: management of diabetes and its complications from preconception to the postnatal period. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Billionnet, C, Mitanchez, D, Weill, A, Nizard, J, Alla, F, Hartemann, A, et al.. Gestational diabetes and adverse perinatal outcomes from 716,152 births in France in 2012. Diabetologia 2017;60:636–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-017-4206-6.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Feig, DS, Hwee, J, Shah, BR, Booth, GL, Bierman, AS, Lipscombe, LL. Trends in incidence of diabetes in pregnancy and serious perinatal outcomes: a large, population-based study in Ontario, Canada, 1996–2010. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1590–6. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-2717.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Murphy, HR, Steel, SA, Roland, JM, Morris, D, Ball, V, Campbell, PJ, et al.. East Anglia Study Group for Improving Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Diabetes (EASIPOD). Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by type 1 and type 2 diabetes: influences of glycaemic control, obesity and social disadvantage. Diabet Med 2011;28:1060–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03333.x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Bell, R, Bailey, K, Cresswell, T, Hawthorne, G, Critchley, J, Lewis-Barned, N, Northern Diabetic Pregnancy Survey Steering Group. Trends in prevalence and outcomes of pregnancy in women with pre-existing type I and type II diabetes. BJOG 2008;115:445–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01644.x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Robinson, HP, Fleming, JE. A critical evaluation of sonar “crown-rump length” measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975;82:702–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00710.x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Nicolaides, KH. Screening for fetal aneuploidies at 11 to 13 weeks. Prenat Diagn 2011;31:7–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2637.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Syngelaki, A, Hammami, A, Bower, S, Zidere, V, Akolekar, R, Nicolaides, KH. Diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities on routine ultrasound examination at 11-13 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019;54:468–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20844.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Nicolaides, KH, Wright, D, Syngelaki, A, Wright, A, Akolekar, R. Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018;52:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.19073.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Sandlin, AT, Chauhan, SP, Magann, EF. Clinical relevance of sonographically estimated amniotic fluid volume: polyhydramnios. J Ultrasound Med 2013;32:851–63. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.32.5.851.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Brown, MA, Magee, LA, Kenny, LC, Karumanchi, SA, McCarthy, FP, Saito, S, et al.. International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: ISSHP classification, diagnosis & management recommendations for international practice. Pregnancy Hypertens 2018;13:291–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2018.05.004.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Lucas, DN, Yentis, SM, Kinsella, SM, Holdcroft, A, May, AE, Wee, M, et al.. Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification. J R Soc Med 2000;93:346–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680009300703.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Mavrides, E, Allard, S, Chandraharan, E, Collins, P, Green, L, Hunt, BJ, et al., Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Prevention and management of postpartum haemorrhage. BJOG 2016;124:e106-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14178.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Sultan, AH. Editorial: obstetrical perineal injury and anal incontinence. Clin Risk 1999;6:193–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/135626229900500601.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Crofts, J, Draycott, TJ, Montague, I. On behalf of the royal College of obstetricians and gynaecologists. Shoulder dystocia (Green top Guideline No. 42). London: RCOG Press; 2012.Suche in Google Scholar

24. Ambalavanan, N, Carlo, WA, Shankaran, S, Bann, CM, Emrich, SL, Higgins, RD, et al.. National Institute of child health and human development neonatal research network. Predicting outcomes of neonates diagnosed with hypoxemic-ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatrics 2006;118:2084–93. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-1591.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Thompson-Branch, A, Havranek, T. Neonatal hypoglycemia. Pediatr Rev 2017;38:147–57. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.2016-0063.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Øyen, N, Diaz, LJ, Leirgul, E, Boyd, HA, Priest, J, Mathiesen, ER, et al.. Prepregnancy diabetes and offspring risk of congenital heart disease: a nationwide cohort study. Circulation 2016;133:2243–53. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.115.017465.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Mackin, ST, Nelson, SM, Kerssens, JJ, Wood, R, Wild, S, Colhoun, HM, et al.. SDRN Epidemiology Group. Diabetes and pregnancy: national trends over a 15 year period. Diabetologia 2018;61:1081–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-017-4529-3.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Peticca, P, Keely, EJ, Walker, MC, Yang, Q, Bottomley, J. Pregnancy outcomes in diabetes subtypes: how do they compare? A province-based study of Ontario, 2005-2006. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009;31:487–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34210-4.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Persson, M, Norman, M, Hanson, U. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in type 1 diabetic pregnancies: a large, population-based study. Diabetes Care 2009;32:2005–9. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-0656.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2023-0183).


Received: 2023-05-01
Accepted: 2023-08-21
Published Online: 2023-09-07
Published in Print: 2024-01-29

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Human papillomavirus prevalence in pregnant women living with human immunodeficiency virus infection: a scoping review of the literature
  4. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  5. Enhanced recovery after cesarean from the patient perspective: a prospective study of the ERAC Questionnaire (ERAC-Q)
  6. Outcomes of cesarean delivery in placenta accreta: conservative delivery vs. cesarean hysterectomy
  7. Maternal and neonatal complications in pregnancies with and without pre-gestational diabetes mellitus
  8. Down-regulated Wnt7a and GPR124 in early-onset preeclampsia placentas reduce invasion and migration of trophoblast cells
  9. Pregnancy, delivery and neonatal outcomes in women with gastrointestinal system cancer in pregnancy. An evaluation of a population database
  10. Paternal age and perinatal outcomes: an observational study
  11. The association between maternal colonization with Group B Streptococcus and infectious morbidity following transcervical Foley catheter-assisted labor induction
  12. Hepatic arterial buffer response: activation in donor fetuses and the effect of laser ablation of intertwin anastomosis
  13. Comparison between trans-vaginal and trans-abdominal ultrasound examination of the cervix in the second trimester of pregnancy: a prospective study
  14. Collaboration between maternal-fetal medicine and family planning: a survey of Northeast US academic medical centers
  15. Original Articles – Fetus
  16. Association of low pregnancy associated plasma protein-A with increased umbilical artery pulsatility index in cases of fetal weight between the 3rd and 10th percentiles: a retrospective cohort study
  17. Genetic analysis, ultrasound phenotype, and pregnancy outcomes of fetuses with Xp22.33 or Yp11.32 microdeletions
  18. Original Articles – Neonates
  19. Umbilical cord blood hematological parameters in predicting early onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) – a prospective cohort study
  20. Changes in circMyt1l/rno-let-7d-5p/brain-derived neurotrophic factor. A damaged periventricular white matter damage model in neonatal rats
  21. Short Communication
  22. Effects of gender on fetal cortical development: a secondary analysis of a prospective cross-sectional study
  23. Acknowledgment
  24. Acknowledgment
Heruntergeladen am 30.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2023-0183/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen