Home Hepatic arterial buffer response: activation in donor fetuses and the effect of laser ablation of intertwin anastomosis
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Hepatic arterial buffer response: activation in donor fetuses and the effect of laser ablation of intertwin anastomosis

  • Jader de Jesus Cruz ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Joana Bernardeco ORCID logo , Claudia Rijo , Alvaro Cohen and Fatima Serrano ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: October 18, 2023

Abstract

Objectives

Hepatic arterial buffer response (HABR) is an important defence mechanism for maintaining liver blood flow. It is suspected that HABR is active in monochorionic diamniotic twins (MCDA) with twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) where donor compensates a setting of volume depletion and the recipient an overload. The present study investigates whether in TTTS, HABR is active in donor and/or recipient individually and try to determine if the activation of HABR is a direct response to TTTS.

Methods

Hepatic artery (HA) peak systolic velocity (PSV) was measured in normal MCDA fetuses and TTTS. Correlation with relevant fetal Dopplers and characteristics were determined. Z-scores for HA-PSV (HAV-Z) were calculated and its association with TTTS in donors and recipients were determined as well as changes in HAV-Z after laser treatment.

Results

In this study 118 MCDA were included, 61.9 % normal and 38.1 % TTTS. Of the TTTS 22 required laser treatment. A total of 382 scans were performed in normal group and 155 in TTTS. Our data demonstrates that in donors HAV-Z was 2.4 Z-scores higher compared to normal fetuses (β=2.429 95 % CI 1.887, 2.971; p<0.001) and after laser treatment HAV-Z reduced (β=−1.829 95 % CI −2.593, −1.064; p<0.001). There was no significant difference between recipients and normal (β=−0.092 95 % CI −0.633, 0.449; p=0.738).

Conclusions

HABR is active in TTTS, promoting an increased hepatic blood flow in donors. The activation is direct response to TTTS as shown by the reduction in HAV-Z after laser. This finding provides important insights into the pathophysiology of TTTS.


Corresponding author: Jader de Jesus Cruz, MD, MSc, Department of Fetal Medicine, Central Lisbon University Hospitals, R. Viriato 1, 2890-495, Lisbon, Portugal, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: The research had complied with all relevant national regulations, institutional policies, and in accordance with tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by two Ethics Committee for Research under the numbers NMS/FCM-UNL nº08/2021/CEFCM and CHULC nº1008/2021.

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study, or their legal guardians or wards.

  3. Author contributions: Each author listed made substantial contributions to the conception, design of the work; the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approved of the version to be published.

  4. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest of any form.

  5. Research funding: None declared.

  6. Data availability: The data that support the findings of this study are available from CHULC but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of CHULC.

References

1. Lautt, WW. Mechanism and role of intrinsic regulation of hepatic arterial blood flow: hepatic arterial buffer response. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 1985;249:G549–56. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.1985.249.5.g549.Search in Google Scholar

2. Lautt, WW. Regulatory processes interacting to maintain hepatic blood flow constancy: vascular compliance, hepatic arterial buffer response, hepatorenal reflex, liver regeneration, escape from vasoconstriction. Hepatol Res 2007;37:891–903. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1872-034x.2007.00148.x.Search in Google Scholar

3. Cruz, JJ, Bernardeco, J, Cohen, A, Serrano, F. Hepatic arterial buffer response in monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies with twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. J Perinat Med 2013;51:517–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2022-0322.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Ebbing, C, Rasmussen, S, Godfrey, KM, Hanson, MA, Kiserud, T. Hepatic artery hemodynamics suggest operation of a buffer response in the human fetus. Reprod Sci 2008;15:166–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719107310307.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Ebbing, C, Rasmussen, S, Godfrey, KM, Hanson, MA, Kiserud, T. Redistribution pattern of fetal liver circulation in intrauterine growth restriction. Acta Obstet Gyn Scan 2009;88:1118–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340903214924.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Kilavuz, Ö, Vetter, K. Is the liver of the fetus the 4th preferential organ for arterial blood supply besides brain, heart, and adrenal glands? J Perinat Med 1999;27:103–6. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm.1999.012.Search in Google Scholar

7. Lewi, L. Monochorionic diamniotic twins: what do I tell the prospective parents? Prenatal Diag 2020;40:766–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5705.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Lewi, L, Gucciardo, L, Mieghem, TV, de Koninck, P, Beck, V, Medek, H, et al.. Monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies: natural history and risk stratification. Fetal Diagn Ther 2010;27:121–33. https://doi.org/10.1159/000313300.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Lewi, L, Jani, J, Cannie, M, Robyr, R, Ville, Y, Hecher, K, et al.. Intertwin anastomoses in monochorionic placentas after fetoscopic laser coagulation for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: is there more than meets the eye? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:790–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.062.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Lopriore, E, Lewi, L, Khalil, A. Monochorionic twins: a delicate balance. J Clin Med 2019;8:1711. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8101711.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Wohlmuth, C, Gardiner, HM. Twin–twin transfusion syndrome: don’t rely on fluids and bladders to catch it early. Ultrasound Obst Gyn 2022;59:7–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.24791.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Cruz, J, Cohen, A, Martins, A, Francisco, C, Correia, J. Monochorionic diaminiotic twins complications: twin to twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) and selective fetal growth restriction [Internet]. Acta Med Port 2012;5:52–7.Search in Google Scholar

13. von Kaisenberg, C, Klaritsch, P, Ochsenbein-Kölble, N, Hodel, M, Nothacker, M, Hecher, K. Screening, management and delivery in twin pregnancy. Ultraschall Med 2020;42:367–78. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1248-8896.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Khalil, A, Rodgers, M, Baschat, A, Bhide, A, Gratacos, E, Hecher, K, et al.. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47:247–63, https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15821.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Hadlock, FP, Harrist, RB, Sharman, RS, Deter, RL, Park, SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements—a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:333–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(85)90298-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Khalil, A, D’Antonio, F, Dias, T, Cooper, D, Thilaganathan, B, (STORK) on behalf of the STORC. Ultrasound estimation of birth weight in twin pregnancy: comparison of biometry algorithms in the STORK multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obst Gyn 2014;44:210–20, https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13253.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Warsof, SL, Gohari, P, Berkowitz, RL, Hobbins, JC. The estimation of fetal weight by computer-assisted analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977;128:881–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(77)90058-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Couck, I, Ponnet, S, Thewissen, L, Russo, F, Deprest, J, Catte, LD, et al.. The detection, outcome, and presentation of twin-twin transfusion syndrome in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies followed with a protocol of fortnightly ultrasound examination. Fetal Diagn Ther 2021;48:353–60. https://doi.org/10.1159/000514575.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Quintero, RA, Morales, WJ, Allen, MH, Bornick, PW, Johnson, PK, Kruger, M. Staging of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Perinatol 1999;19:550–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7200292.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Andrade, C. Z scores, standard scores, and composite test scores explained. Indian J Psychol Med 2021;43:555–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176211046525.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Chubb, H, Simpson, JM. The use of Z-scores in paediatric cardiology. Ann Pediatric Cardiol 2012;5:179–84. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2069.99622.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Wohlmuth, C, Gardiner, HM, Diehl, W, Hecher, K. Fetal cardiovascular hemodynamics in twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Acta Obstet Gyn Scan 2016;95:664–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12871.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Kunisaki, SM, Azpurua, H, Fuchs, JR, Graves, SC, Zurakowski, D, Fauza, DO. Fetal hepatic haematopoiesis is modulated by arterial blood flow to the liver. Br J Haematol 2006;134:330–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06183.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Saab, RH, DeVore, GR, Monson, M, Masri, J, Korst, LM, Chmait, RH. Correction of fetal umbilical vein flow imbalance following laser surgery for twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obst Gyn 2022;60:774–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.26041.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Bamberg, C, Hecher, K. Update on twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2019;58:55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.12.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2023-05-05
Accepted: 2023-09-12
Published Online: 2023-10-18
Published in Print: 2024-01-29

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Human papillomavirus prevalence in pregnant women living with human immunodeficiency virus infection: a scoping review of the literature
  4. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  5. Enhanced recovery after cesarean from the patient perspective: a prospective study of the ERAC Questionnaire (ERAC-Q)
  6. Outcomes of cesarean delivery in placenta accreta: conservative delivery vs. cesarean hysterectomy
  7. Maternal and neonatal complications in pregnancies with and without pre-gestational diabetes mellitus
  8. Down-regulated Wnt7a and GPR124 in early-onset preeclampsia placentas reduce invasion and migration of trophoblast cells
  9. Pregnancy, delivery and neonatal outcomes in women with gastrointestinal system cancer in pregnancy. An evaluation of a population database
  10. Paternal age and perinatal outcomes: an observational study
  11. The association between maternal colonization with Group B Streptococcus and infectious morbidity following transcervical Foley catheter-assisted labor induction
  12. Hepatic arterial buffer response: activation in donor fetuses and the effect of laser ablation of intertwin anastomosis
  13. Comparison between trans-vaginal and trans-abdominal ultrasound examination of the cervix in the second trimester of pregnancy: a prospective study
  14. Collaboration between maternal-fetal medicine and family planning: a survey of Northeast US academic medical centers
  15. Original Articles – Fetus
  16. Association of low pregnancy associated plasma protein-A with increased umbilical artery pulsatility index in cases of fetal weight between the 3rd and 10th percentiles: a retrospective cohort study
  17. Genetic analysis, ultrasound phenotype, and pregnancy outcomes of fetuses with Xp22.33 or Yp11.32 microdeletions
  18. Original Articles – Neonates
  19. Umbilical cord blood hematological parameters in predicting early onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) – a prospective cohort study
  20. Changes in circMyt1l/rno-let-7d-5p/brain-derived neurotrophic factor. A damaged periventricular white matter damage model in neonatal rats
  21. Short Communication
  22. Effects of gender on fetal cortical development: a secondary analysis of a prospective cross-sectional study
  23. Acknowledgment
  24. Acknowledgment
Downloaded on 21.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2023-0191/html
Scroll to top button