Home High frequency band limits in spectral analysis of heart rate variability in preterm infants
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

High frequency band limits in spectral analysis of heart rate variability in preterm infants

  • Hadas Israeli-Mendlovic , Joseph Mendlovic ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Luba Zuk and Michal Katz-Leurer
Published/Copyright: December 7, 2021

Abstract

Objectives

The current study aims to assess different high-frequency (HF) band power calculations based on different frequency bandwidth values, and compare them with the time domain the root mean square of successive RR differences (RMSSD) value in preterm infants.

Methods

At week 32, electrocardiogram (ECG) and breathing rate (BR) were recorded for 24 h on 30 preterm infants born between 28 and 32 weeks. The recording held in the neonatal intensive care unit without any interruption of routine.

Results

The median 24 h BR was 40–78 breaths per minute. The RMSSD was highly and positively correlated with frequency bands that were based on each preterms BR range, or on a constant frequency with band limits of 0.4–2 Hz.

Conclusions

At week 32, HF band Hz limits should be calculated based on each child’s breathing rate, generally between 0.4 and 2 Hz.


Corresponding author: Joseph Mendlovic, MD, Shaare–Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel, Phone: +972 508685121, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: This work was performed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a PhD degree of Hadas Israeli-Mendlovic, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Parents signed the consent forms before the study.

  5. Ethical approval: The study protocol was approved by the Helsinki committee of Shaare Zedek Medical Center (0144-16-SZMC) and the Ethics Committee of Tel Aviv University.

References

1. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J. 1996;17:354–81.10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014868Search in Google Scholar

2. Catai, AM, Pastre, CM, Godoy, MF, Silva, ED, Takahashi, ACM, Vanderlei, LCM. Heart rate variability: are you using it properly? Standardisation checklist of procedures. Braz J Phys Ther 2020;24:91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2019.02.006.Search in Google Scholar

3. Sztajzel, J. Heart rate variability: a noninvasive electrocardiographic method to measure the autonomic nervous system. Swiss Med Wkly 2004;134:514–22.Search in Google Scholar

4. Selig, FA, Tonolli, ER, Silva, EV, Godoy, MF. Heart rate variability in preterm and term neonates. Arq Bras Cardiol 2011;96:443–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0066-782x2011005000059.Search in Google Scholar

5. Gagnon, R, Campbell, K, Hunse, C, Patrick, J. Patterns of human fetal heart rate accelerations from 26 weeks to term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;157:743–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80042-x.Search in Google Scholar

6. Fairchild, KD. Predictive monitoring for early detection of sepsis in neonatal ICU patients. Curr Opin Pediatr 2013;25:172–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/mop.0b013e32835e8fe6.Search in Google Scholar

7. Sahni, R, Schulze, KF, Kashyap, S, Ohira-Kist, K, Myers, MM, Fifer, WP. Body position, sleep states, and cardiorespiratory activity in developing low birth weight infants. Early Hum Dev 1999;54:197–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-3782(98)00104-2.Search in Google Scholar

8. Thiriez, G, Mougey, C, Vermeylen, D, Wermenbol, V, Lanquart, JP, Lin, JS, et al.. Altered autonomic control in preterm newborns with impaired neurological outcomes. Clin Auton Res 2015;25:233–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-015-0298-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Cardoso, S, Silva, MJ, Guimarães, H. Autonomic nervous system in newborns: a review based on heart rate variability. Childs Nerv Syst 2017;33:1053–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-017-3436-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Lehrer, PM, Gevirtz, R. Heart rate variability biofeedback: how and why does it work? Front Psychol 2014;21:756. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00756.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Joshi, R, Kommers, D, Guo, C, Bikker, JW, Feijs, L, van Pul, C, et al.. Statistical modeling of heart rate variability to unravel the factors affecting autonomic regulation in preterm infants. Sci Rep 2019;229:7691. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44209-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Rassi, D, Mishin, A, Zhuravlev, YE, Matthes, J. Time domain correlation analysis of heart rate variability in preterm neonates. Early Hum Dev 2005;81:341–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2004.09.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Longin, E, Gerstner, T, Schaible, T, Lenz, T, König, S. Maturation of the autonomic nervous system: differences in heart rate variability in premature vs. term infants. J Perinat Med 2006;34:303–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2006.058.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Patural, H, Pichot, V, Jaziri, F, Teyssier, G, Gaspoz, JM, Roche, F, et al.. Autonomic cardiac control of very preterm newborns: a prolonged dysfunction. Early Hum Dev 2008;84:681–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2008.04.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Krueger, C, van Oostrom, JH, Shuster, J. A longitudinal description of heart rate variability in 28--34-week-old preterm infants. Biol Res Nurs 2010;11:261–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099800409341175.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Nakamura, T, Horio, H, Miyashita, S, Chiba, Y, Sato, S. Identification of development and autonomic nerve activity from heart rate variability in preterm infants. Biosystems 2005;79:117–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2004.09.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Van Laar, JO, Porath, MM, Peters, CH, Oei, SG. Spectral analysis of fetal heart rate variability for fetal surveillance: review of the literature. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008;87:300–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340801898950.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Gonçalves, H, Amorim-Costa, C, Ayres-de-Campos, D, Bernardes, J. Gender-specific evolution of fetal heart rate variability throughout gestation: a study of 8823 cases. Early Hum Dev 2017;115:38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.09.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Signorini, MG, Magenes, G, Cerutti, S, Arduini, D. Linear and nonlinear parameters for the analysis of fetal heart rate signal from cardiotocographic recordings. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003;50:365–74. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2003.808824.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Kleiger, RE, Stein, PK, Bigger, JTJr. Heart rate variability: measurement and clinical utility. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2005;10:88–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-474x.2005.10101.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Berntson, GG, Quigley, KS, Jang, JF, Boysen, ST. An approach to artifact identification: application to heart period data. Psychophysiology 1990;27:586–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb01982.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Salo, MA, Huikuri, HV, Seppänen, T. Ectopic beats in heart rate variability analysis: effects of editing on time and frequency domain measures. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2001;6:5–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-474x.2001.tb00080.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2021-06-09
Accepted: 2021-11-14
Published Online: 2021-12-07
Published in Print: 2022-03-28

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Corner of Academy
  3. Cost of providing cell-free DNA screening for Down syndrome in Finland using different strategies
  4. Adverse perinatal outcomes following the prenatal diagnosis of isolated single umbilical artery in singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  5. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  6. Perinatal outcomes in women with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection: comparison with contemporary and matched pre-COVID-19 controls
  7. The postpartum period during the COVID-19 pandemic: investigating Turkish women’s postpartum support and postpartum-specific anxiety
  8. First-line noninvasive management of cytomegalovirus primary infection in pregnancy
  9. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of clinically significant placenta accreta spectrum disorders
  10. Improved management of placenta accreta spectrum disorders: experience from a single institution
  11. A randomized controlled trial of two-doses of vaginal progesterone 400 vs. 200 mg for prevention of preterm labor in twin gestations
  12. The impact of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy on prenatal screening
  13. Original Articles – Fetus
  14. Myocardial deformation analysis in late-onset small-for-gestational-age and growth-restricted fetuses using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a prospective cohort study
  15. HDlive Flow Silhouette with spatiotemporal image correlation for assessment of fetal cardiac structures at 12 to 14 + 6 weeks of gestation
  16. Umbilical artery pulsatility index and half-peak systolic velocity in second- and third-trimester fetuses with trisomy 18 and 13
  17. Original Articles – Neonates
  18. Pulmonary hypertension in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: risk factors, mortality and duration of hospitalisation
  19. Outcomes from birth to 6 months of publicly insured infants born to mothers with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in the United States
  20. Placental findings are not associated with neurodevelopmental outcome in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy – an 11-year single-center experience
  21. High frequency band limits in spectral analysis of heart rate variability in preterm infants
  22. Bacterial DNA detection in very preterm infants assessed for risk of early onset sepsis
  23. Short Communication
  24. Healthcare workers’ attitudes about vaccination of pregnant women and those wishing to become pregnant
  25. Letter to the Editors
  26. Comment on Abdel Wahab et al.: A randomized controlled trial of two-doses of vaginal progesterone 400 vs. 200 mg for prevention of preterm labor in twin gestations
  27. Re: Comment on Abdel Wahab et al.: A randomized controlled trial of two-doses of vaginal progesterone 400 vs. 200 mg for prevention of preterm labor in twin gestations
  28. SARS-CoV-2 behavior, through the eyes of a perinatologist?
  29. Re: SARS-CoV-2 behavior, through the eyes of a perinatologist?
Downloaded on 17.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2021-0299/html
Scroll to top button