Abstract
Objectives
The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic ability of multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in very preterm infants assessed for risk of early onset neonatal sepsis (EOS).
Methods
Prospective observational cohort study. Blood samples of preterm neonates ≤32 weeks of gestation were evaluated by commercial multiplex real-time PCR within 2 h after delivery. The definition of EOS was based on positive blood culture and clinical signs of infection or negative blood culture, clinical signs of infection and abnormal neonatal blood count and serum biomarkers.
Results
Among 82 subjects analyzed in the study, 15 had clinical or confirmed EOS. PCR was positive in four of these infants (including the only one with a positive blood culture), as well as in 15 of the 67 infants without sepsis (sensitivity 27%, specificity 78%). Out of 19 PCR positive subjects, Escherichia coli was detected in 12 infants (63%). Statistically significant association was found between vaginal E. coli colonization of the mother and E. coli PCR positivity of the neonate (p=0.001). No relationship was found between neonatal E. coli swab results and assessment findings of bacterial DNA in neonatal blood stream.
Conclusions
Multiplex real-time PCR had insufficient diagnostic capability for EOS in high risk very preterm infants. The study revealed no significant association between PCR results and the diagnosis of clinical EOS. Correlation between maternal vaginal swab results and positive PCR in the newborn needs further investigation to fully understand the role of bacterial DNA analysis in preterm infants.
Introduction
Early onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) remains a challenging issue accompanied by alarmingly high mortality and adverse outcomes [1, 2]. The diagnosis is based on a positive blood culture and the time of onset within 72 h after delivery [3]. It is considered to be the result of a vertical pathogen transmission [4]. A high risk of EOS is seen specifically in the case of prolonged premature rupture of membranes, clinical and/or laboratory signs of chorioamnionitis and presence of maternal urinary tract infection [4]. Gestational age of <34 weeks is another major risk factor increasing the likelihood of early infection up to tenfold [5]. The total rate of EOS is 0.98 per 1,000 live births, whilst in very preterm infants the rate is 10.96 per 1,000 live births [6].
Reported incidence of EOS generally includes culture-confirmed cases only, despite large numbers of infants treated with antibiotics for culture-negative sepsis [7]. In contrast, the ongoing development of the pediatric definition of sepsis is based on the assessment of organ dysfunction, as the failure to isolate the pathogen does not rule out sepsis [8, 9]. The incidence of culture-negative EOS is uncertain, though it could be 6 to 16 times higher than the number of confirmed cases [7]. The main reasons for this include blood culture limited sensitivity, maternal antimicrobial treatment and insufficient sample collection [3]. Moreover, an indeterminate number of culture-negative infants are possibly not infected [7]. This discrepancy between the standard of EOS diagnostics and clinical practice leads to efforts for alternative detection of causative agents, as more accurate and rapid diagnostic tools of EOS etiology are essential for the improvement of prognosis and rational use of antibiotics [2, 10].
Particularly, molecular diagnostics such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) could offer faster results (within 12 h from sampling) and higher sensitivity compared to blood culture, even in the case of maternal exposure to antibiotic treatment [3, 11]. Multiple molecular assays were evaluated for possible replacement of blood culture in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis, but had insufficient sensitivity [12]. Nevertheless, real-time PCR has a reasonable sensitivity and specificity (both 0.96) to be used as an adjunctive diagnostic tool [12]. Multiplex real-time PCR was found to have a valuable additional role in the diagnosis of sepsis within the general neonatal population, however very limited data on preterm neonates are available [13].
The primary objective of this study was to analyze diagnostic capability of multiplex real-time PCR assay for the bacterial DNA detection in preterm infants at risk of EOS. Secondary outcome was to assess the ability of rapid PCR assay to support the decision making in whether to terminate or continue antibiotic treatment course.
Materials and methods
Subjects
This prospective study was conducted in a single tertiary neonatal intensive care unit from October 2017 until September 2018. Inclusion criteria were: preterm delivery ≤32 weeks of gestation, inborn neonates and collection of blood samples completed within the first 2 h after delivery. Exclusion criteria were: incomplete neonatal records, insufficient sample volume and congenital malformations. The study protocol has complied with all the relevant national guidelines, institutional policies and was in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by local Ethics Committee (2015/06-02-4) and local Committee on Human Research. Written informed consent was obtained from parents of each enrolled infant.
Clinical and histological chorioamnionitis
Clinical chorioamnionitis was defined as: maternal body temperature ≥37.8 °C and a minimum of two other criteria from: maternal or fetal tachycardia, uterine tenderness, malodorous vaginal discharge and leukocytosis ≥15,000 mm−3. Acute inflammatory lesions of the placenta were histologically characterized by the infiltration of neutrophils in the chorion and amnion (acute chorioamnionitis) or in the placenta (intervillositis, deciduitis, or villositis). Funisitis was referred to when the inflammatory process involved the umbilical cord (umbilical vein, umbilical artery, and the Wharton’s jelly) [14].
Blood sampling and tests
Whole blood sample was collected aseptically from the neonate within the first 2 h after delivery through a newly inserted catheter (umbilical vein, umbilical artery or peripheral vein). Blood culture (1 mL) and bacterial DNA analysis were performed, whole blood count, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were determined. The real-time PCR sample was collected into a special tube (volume 1.6 mL – BD Vacutainer Plus Plastic with sodium citrate 0.129 M). The volume of blood collected was 500 μL.
Blood culture
Blood cultures were investigated using the BacT/Alert automated blood culture monitoring system (Bact/Alert, BioMerieux, US). Immediately after sample collection, the blood samples were transported to the microbiology laboratory. Here they were loaded into the Bact/Alert culture instrument and were incubated for a standard period of 5 days (120 h) before being flagged as negative. Bottles flagged up as positive were subcultured on Columbia agar +5% sheep blood (BioMerieux), UriSelect™ 4 Medium (BioRad) and Schaedler agar +5% sheep blood (BioMerieux) plates and a microscopic slide for Gram stain was prepared. After 4–6 h of incubation, the streaked agar plates were inspected and in case of a detectable growth, the visible colonies were identified using the Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) on a MicroFlex LT/SH smart platform (Bruker Daltonik GmbH).
Conventional microbiological methods
High Vaginal Swabs were collected from all women with imminent preterm delivery. Neonatal swabs (ear, stomach and axilla) were taken immediately after admission to NICU. Cotton-tipped swabs were placed in AMIES agar (Micro-Trans Swab, Med-Lab Trade, Czech Republic), then inoculated to sheep blood agar, chocolate agar, and MacConkey agar and incubated aerobically. Organisms were identified by standard microbiological methods.
Bacterial DNA extraction
Bacterial DNA was extracted from citrated blood samples by using a QIAamp DSP DNA Mini Kit, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Briefly, DNA was extracted from 500 µL of citrated blood and eluated into 50 µL of elution buffer. The eluates were stored at −20 °C until further analysis.
Real time PCR analysis
Two multiplex real time PCR assays were used during the study period to detect bacterial nucleic acid for the evaluation of infections in neonates. BactoPlexx Real-Time PCR Kit (KITGEN, Třinec, Czech Republic) and FTD Neonatal sepsis (Fast Track Diagnostics, Luxembourg) were used for the amplification and detection of the pathogens. Nucleic acid input was 2 µL for BactoPlex and 10 µL for FTD Neonatal sepsis. Initial denaturation and thermocycling (°C/seconds) were 94/300 and 94/30, 58/30, 72/30 for BactoPlex assay, for FTD Neonatal sepsis assay they were 94/180 and 94/8, 60/34 respectively. Cycles setting was 50 for Bactoplex and 40 for FTD Neonatal sepsis. Cycles positivity assessment was ≤35 for both assays. The quantitative real-time PCR assays were processed on Rotor-Gene Q (QIANGEN, Hilden, Germany). BactoPlex Real-Time PCR Kit was used until an assay validated for neonatal samples became available. It enables to detect a wide scale of bacterial pathogens: Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa/putida, Serratia marcescens, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus spp. FTD Neonatal sepsis assay was used for the detection of Group B Streptococcus/Streptococcus agalactiae, Listeria monocytogenes, E. coli, S. aureus, Chlamydia trachomatis and Ureaplasma urealyticum/parvum. Each PCR test was performed in conjunction with three controls; positive control, negative control and an internal control. The assay uses Streptococcus equi as an internal control which is introduced into each sample and it also shows the correctness of the extraction process. The individual pathogen specific PCRs had been evaluated previously. Primer and probes used for each reaction are available from the manufacturer.
The presence of specific pathogen sequences in the reaction was detected by an increase in observed fluorescence from the relevant dual-labeled probe, and was reported as a cycle threshold value (Ct) by the Real-Time thermocycler. Subsequently, Ct analysis was performed. The number of cycles was used to quantify bacterial DNA load (BDL).
Neonatal blood count and biomarkers
Blood counts were measured with a Coulter Micro Dif II (Coulter Electronics Ltd., Fullerton, US). CRP was measured by immunoturbidimetry (Cobas 6000, c501 module, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Immunoluminometric assay (Lumitest PCT, Brahms, Germany) was used for PCT analysis. Luminescence was measured automatically in a Berilux Analyser (Behring Diagnostics, Germany). Serum IL-6 level was assessed by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (Cobas 6000, e601 module, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany).
Early onset sepsis and neonatal outcome
Data were collected from neonatal and maternal medical records. The definition of EOS was based on positive blood culture and clinical signs of infection or negative blood culture with manifested clinical symptoms and abnormal levels of two or more biomarkers in the first 72 h of life. The range of 5,000–20,000 white blood cells (WBC) in a microliter of blood was considered as normal. An I:T ratio of ≥0.2, CRP >10 mg/L, PCT >2 μg/L and IL-6 >200 ng/L were considered as abnormal [3, 15, 16]. Clinical signs of an early onset infection included: hypothermia, respiratory instability (apnea, desaturations, respiratory distress syndrome with ongoing mechanical ventilation), cardiac (cyanosis, bradycardia, poor peripheral perfusion, hypotension) and neurological (lethargy, suspected seizures) symptoms [17]. Higher risk of EOS was considered in the presence of clinical and/or laboratory chorioamnionitis, Group B Streptococcal (GBS) and/or E. coli (E. coli) colonization of the mother, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) and preterm onset of labor [18]. Antibiotics were started by the attending physician according to the presence of risk factors, clinical and/or laboratory signs of infection. After 48 h, a decision was made whether to continue with antibiotic treatment according to blood culture findings and the dynamics of clinical signs, blood count and levels of serum biomarkers. Attending physicians were made aware of the PCR result once available, but the obtained result was not considered crucial for the treatment algorithm.
Other neonatal outcomes (respiratory distress syndrome, patent ductus arteriosus, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, periventricular leukomalacia, retinopathy of prematurity and bronchopulmonary dysplasia) were followed up according to the Vermont-Oxford definition [19].
Statistical analysis
Data were reported using descriptive statistical methods. Univariate analyses were performed using Chi-square, Fisher’s exact and Mann-Whitney U tests. All reported p-values are two-sided and not adjusted for multiplicity. A value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0.0.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).
Results
One hundred and three infants were eligible for the study. Twenty-one infants were excluded due to insufficient sample volumes, incomplete laboratory samples and unavailable PCR test. The characteristics of the study group (n=82) are summarized in Table 1.
Characteristics of the study group (n=82).a
| Gestational age, weeks | 27.0 ± 1.9 |
| Birth weight, g | 990 ± 311 |
| Sex, male | 54 (66) |
| Mode of delivery | |
| Spontaneous | 15 (18) |
| C-section | 67 (82) |
| Clinical chorioamnionitis | 29 (35) |
| Histological chorioamnionitisb | |
| None | 29 (35) |
| Chorioamnionitis | 16 (20) |
| Chorioamnionitis and funisitis | 12 (15) |
| Preterm premature rupture of membrane | 26 (32) |
| Antibiotics in mothers | 50 (61) |
| Invasive prenatal procedures | |
| None | 46 (56) |
| Amniocentesis | 32 (39) |
| Other | 4 (5) |
| Early onset sepsis | |
| No sepsis | 67 (82) |
| Proven or clinical sepsis | 15 (18) |
| Positive serum bacterial DNA load | 19 (23) |
| Mortality | 8 (10) |
-
aContinuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Categorical variables are presented as number (percent). bHistological examination was not performed in 25 cases.
PCR positive group
Twenty-nine infants were assessed by BactoPlex Real-Time PCR Kit, 53 by FTD Neonatal sepsis. Nineteen neonates were PCR positive. Seven positive results were assessed by BactoPlex Real-Time PCR Kit, 12 by FTD Neonatal sepsis. No difference was found in the capability to detect bacterial DNA between both tests (24% vs. 23% respectively, p>0.99). E. coli was the most frequently detected strain (12 episodes, 63%). The remaining seven positive results included Streptococcus species (2 episodes), S. aureus (2), S. maltophilia (1), Ureaplasma parvum (1) and Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (1). The summary of microbiological and PCR findings of positive patients is expressed in Table 2. Only one patient had a positive blood culture with a corresponding PCR result (E. coli). Three patients regarded as infected had a negative blood culture and positive PCR result (S. aureus, U. parvum, E. coli). Eleven patients were treated as infected despite no pathogen detection. This shows a low PCR sensitivity of 27% for EOS. In two cases the clinical team decided to discontinue antibiotic treatment after 48 h despite a positive PCR result (S. maltophilia, E. coli). Forty-two patients received no antibiotic treatment for EOS and had no clinical and/or laboratory signs of early infection. Thirteen of them were positive for PCR. This shows a moderate specificity and a negative predictive value of 78% and 83%, respectively. The accuracy of the PCR test for EOS was 68%. We found no association of positive PCR results with clinical or histological chorioamnionitis and neonatal outcomes. WBC count was significantly lower in the PCR positive group, but it did not meet the EOS criteria. Comparison of clinical data and laboratory findings over the period of 2 h after delivery between PCR positive and negative patients are summarized in Table 3.
Microbiological and PCR summary of findings in positive patients.
| ID | GA, weeks | BW, g | PCR (organism) | PCR (BDL) | Number of cycles | PCR assay | Blood culture | Neonatal swabs (ear, axila, stomach) | Vaginal swab | Neonatal infection | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 28 | 950 | CoNS | 672 | 33 | BactoPlex | Negative | Negative | GBS | No sepsis | No ATB |
| 6 | 25 | 820 | Strep. spp. | 6,760 | 30 | BactoPlex | Negative | CoNS | CA, EF | No sepsis | No ATB |
| 7 | 25 | 700 | Strep. spp. | 17,086 | 28 | BactoPlex | Negative | Negative | CA, EC | No sepsis | No ATB |
| 9 | 24 | 490 | S. maltophilia | 36,194 | 27 | BactoPlex | Negative | EC, EF | Negative | No sepsis | ATB 48 h, death due to NEC/LOS at day 12 (E. coli) |
| 17 | 25 | 650 | E. coli | 388 | 33 | BactoPlex | Negative | Str. vestibul. | EC, KP | No sepsis | No ATB |
| 18 | 25 | 800 | E. coli | 7,302 | 31 | BactoPlex | Negative | Negative | EC, KP | No sepsis | No ATB |
| 21 | 27 | 900 | E. coli | 1,365 | 31 | BactoPlex | Negative | Negative | GV | No sepsis | No ATB |
| 35 | 30 | 1,290 | E. coli | 40,124 | 27 | FTD neonatal sepsis | EC | EC | EC | Proven sepsis | E. coli meningitis |
| 38 | 27 | 1,180 | S. aureus | 1,977 | 32 | FTD neonatal sepsis | Negative | SH | Negative | Clinical sepsis | ATB 5 days |
| 39 | 30 | 1,410 | U. parvum | 4,889 | 31 | FTD neonatal sepsis | Negative | Negative | EC, CA, EF | Clinical sepsis | ATB 7 days |
| 47 | 30 | 1,650 | S. aureus | 7,875 | 31 | FTD neonatal sepsis | Negative | Negative | Negative | No sepsis | No ATB |
| 51 | 26 | 980 | E. coli | 806 | 33 | FTD neonatal sepsis | Negative | Negative | SV | Clinical sepsis | ATB 5 days |
| 52 | 25 | 915 | E. coli | 552 | 34 | FTD neonatal sepsis | Negative | Negative | Negative | No sepsis | No ATB |
| 53 | 27 | 960 | E. coli | 356 | 34 | FTD neonatal sepsis | Negative | Negative | Negative | No sepsis | No ATB |
| 56 | 28 | 1,200 | E. coli | 266 | 33 | FTD neonatal sepsis | Negative | Negative | EC | No sepsis | No ATB |
| 57 | 28 | 1,180 | E. coli | 162 | 33 | FTD neonatal sepsis | Negative | Negative | EC | No sepsis | No ATB |
| 60 | 29 | 970 | E. coli | 275 | 33 | FTD neonatal sepsis | Negative | Negative | CA, EC, EB | No sepsis | ATB 48 h |
| 63 | 25 | 920 | E. coli | 321 | 33 | FTD neonatal sepsis | Negative | Negative | EC, EF, EB | No sepsis | No ATB |
| 75 | 28 | 1,160 | E. coli | 149,000 | 26 | FTD neonatal sepsis | Negative | EC | Negative | No sepsis | No ATB |
-
ATB, antibiotics; BDL, bacterial DNA load; BW (g), birth weight (g); CA, Candida albicans; CoNS, coagulase-negative staphylococci; EB, Enterobacteriaceae; EC, Escherichia coli; EF, Enterococcus faecalis; GA (weeks), gestational age (weeks); GV, Gardnerella vaginalis; KP, Klebsiella pneumoniae; SH, Staphylococcus hominis; Str. vestibul., Streptococcus vestibularis; SV, Streptococcus viridans.
Comparison of clinical data and laboratory findings between PCR positive and negative patients.a
| PCR negative (n=63) | PCR positive (n=19) | p-Values | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gestational age, weeks | 27 ± 2 (24–31) | 27 ± 2 (24–30) | 0.95 |
| Birth weight, g | 985 ± 323 (440–1,900) | 1,007 ± 277 (490–1,650) | 0.66 |
| Early onset sepsis | |||
| No sepsis | 52 (83) | 15 (79) | 0.73 |
| Proven or clinical sepsis | 11 (17) | 4 (21) | |
| C-reactive protein, mg/L | 1.0 (0.1–1.8) | 4.2 (0–9.0) | 0.82 |
| Procalcitonin, μg/L | 0.9 (0.4–1.4) | 2.8 (0.1–5.4) | 0.05 |
| Interleukin 6, ng/L | 561 (272–850) | 592 (100–1,085) | 0.96 |
| WBC count (×1,000/uL) | 10.4 (8.4–12.3) | 6.5 (5.2–7.6) | 0.02 |
| I/T ratio | 0.12 (0.09–0.16) | 0.09 (0.03–0.14) | 0.19 |
| Use of antibiotics, days | 2.0 ± 2.3 (0–10) | 1.3 ± 2.2 (0–7) | 0.15 |
| Late onset sepsis | 16 (25) | 5 (26) | >0.99 |
| Necrotizing enterocolitis | 5 (8) | 1 (5) | >0.99 |
| Intraventricular hemorrhage ≥ grade III | 7 (11) | 2 (11) | 0.94 |
| Bronchopulmonary dysplasia | 42 (72) | 13 (77) | 0.74 |
| Retinopathy of prematurity (all stages) | 13 (21) | 5 (26) | 0.60 |
| Survival | 56 (89) | 18 (95) | 0.45 |
-
aContinuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (range). Categorical variables are presented as number (percent). Laboratory data are presented as means (lower and upper bound 95% Confidence Interval). Statistically significant difference p<0.05 (Pearson Chi-Square test, Fisher’s exact test and Mann-Whitney U test accordingly).
E. coli PCR positive sub-group
E. coli was the most frequent pathogen found in swabs of both mothers (16 cases, 20%) and neonates (13 cases, 16%), however there was no statistically significant link between them (p=0.71). No relationship was detected between neonatal E. coli swabs (ear, stomach, axilla) and bacterial PCR blood stream assessment results. Statistically significant association was revealed between vaginal E. coli colonization of mothers and E. coli PCR positivity in infants (44% PCR positive neonates of mothers with E. coli positive vaginal swabs vs. 8% PCR positive neonates of E. coli negative mothers, p=0.001), regardless of PPROM presence and mode of delivery. A positive E. coli vaginal swab result was not associated with higher frequency of chorioamnionitis and funisitis. No differences in neonatal morbidity, neonatal infection, mode of delivery and blood sampling procedure were found between E. coli PCR positive and negative subjects.
Use of antibiotics
Antibiotic treatment was commenced in 40 infants overall, for suspected EOS and the presence of risk factors. In 25 patients with negative blood culture results, the antibiotics were discontinued after 48 h. In 15 infants with persistent clinical and laboratory findings (including one case with positive blood culture), antibiotics were continued beyond 48 h.
Discussion
The latest Cochrane systematic review on molecular assays for the diagnosis of sepsis in neonates reveals a reasonable level of overall sensitivity and specificity. However, only five studies out of 35 in the summary of findings investigated preterm neonates alone and only two exclusively EOS. The reported quality of evidence regarding these studies was low [20].
Our observational study investigated solely very preterm infants at lower and higher risk of EOS [18]. Among the 19 PCR positive results, only one case can be considered truly positive for EOS, as defined by the current diagnostic gold standard [21]. Despite the statistical differences in levels of inflammatory biomarkers (WBC count, PCT) between the PCR positive and negative groups, 15 bacterial PCR positive cases showed insufficient association with clinical and/or other laboratory findings to meet the definition of suspected EOS. Moreover, the revealed statistically significant difference in WBC levels has no clinical impact (95% CI: 5.2–7.6 × 1,000/uL in DNA positive vs. 8.4–12.3 × 1,000/uL in DNA negative cases). PCT values were low in both groups and the difference had limited statistical significance.
An unexpected association between maternal E. coli positive vaginal swabs and E. coli DNA detection in neonatal blood was found (44% PCR positive neonates of mothers with E. coli positive vaginal swabs vs. 8% PCR positive neonates of E. coli negative mothers, p=0.001). We could not identify any link between E. coli PCR positivity and placental histological findings, PPROM, maternal antibiotic treatment or mode of delivery. We hypothesize that maternal colonization may lead to intra-amniotic invasion and transient blood stream DNA presence in some very preterm infants [14]. Contamination within sample handling is possible, but less likely under these circumstances.
We defined a pragmatic cycle threshold value to avoid false positive results [22]. Nevertheless, one PCR true positive and eight false positive tests were identified, all of which had very low bacterial DNA load (<1,000). This indicates possible false positivity after exceeding 32 amplification cycles for both assays used.
The unfavorable ratio of the number of culture-negative to confirmed sepsis cases found, was corroborated by our study group. Eleven patients (17%) were exposed to prolonged antibiotic treatment despite missing proof of pathogen presence. This re-emphasizes the existing need for the definition of neonatal sepsis not to be restricted to conventional pathogen detection methods [2].
This study has a number of limitations: two commercial multiplex real time PCR assays were used and only one of them was validated for neonatal samples. The sample volume used (0.5 mL) for the PCR test was lower than recommended by manufacturers, which can cause false negative results. However, we followed recently published data where small sample volume was successfully used previously [13, 23]. The fact that only one of all study cases proved positive for both the PCR test and blood culture may seem surprising, although problems related to low rate of blood culture positivity in preterm infants are well known and remain a challenging issue. A negative blood culture result in the first hours of life is common and can be possibly attributed to a high rate of maternal antibiotic use (61%) in our maternal cohort [3].
Conclusions
Multiplex real time PCR had insufficient diagnostic capability to detect bloodstream bacterial DNA in very preterm infants with high risk of EOS. Our study does not support the routine use of real time PCR assay in clinical practice. The correlation between vaginal swab results of the mothers and positive PCR results in newborns was unexpected and needs further investigation.
Funding source: Czech Health Research Council Project
Award Identifier / Grant number: NV17-31403A
-
Research funding: This work was supported by the Czech Health Research Council Project (NV17-31403A).
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Competing interests: This work was supported by the Czech Health Research Council Project (NV17-31403A). The funding had no involvement in study design, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, and writing of the report.
-
Informed consent: Written informed consent was obtained from parents of each enrolled infant.
-
Ethical approval: The study has been complied with all the relevant national guidelines, institutional policies and in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by local Ethics Committee (2015/06-02-4) and local Committee on Human Research.
References
1. Fleischmann-Struzek, C, Goldfarb, DM, Schlattmann, P, Schlapbach, LJ, Reinhart, K, Kissoon, N. The global burden of paediatric and neonatal sepsis: a systematic review. Lancet Respir Med 2018;6:223–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(18)30063-8.Search in Google Scholar
2. Molloy, EJ, Wynn, JL, Bliss, J, Koenig, JM, Keij, FM, McGovern, M, et al.. Neonatal sepsis: need for consensus definition, collaboration and core outcomes. Pediatr Res 2020;88:2–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-0850-5.Search in Google Scholar
3. Iroh Tam, PY, Bendel, CM. Diagnostics for neonatal sepsis: current approaches and future directions. Pediatr Res 2017;82:574–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2017.134.Search in Google Scholar
4. Shane, AL, Sánchez, PJ, Stoll, BJ. Neonatal sepsis. Lancet 2017;390:1770–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31002-4.Search in Google Scholar
5. Benitz, WE, Wynn, JL, Polin, RA. Reappraisal of guidelines for management of neonates with suspected early-onset sepsis. J Pediatr 2015;166:1070–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.12.023.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
6. van den Hoogen, A, Gerards, LJ, Verboon-Maciolek, MA, Fleer, A, Krediet, TG. Long-term trends in the epidemiology of neonatal sepsis and antibiotic susceptibility of causative agents. Neonatology 2010;97:22–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000226604.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
7. Klingenberg, C, Kornelisse, RF, Buonocore, G, Maier, RF, Stocker, M. Culture-negative early-onset neonatal sepsis – at the crossroad between efficient sepsis care and antimicrobial stewardship. Front Pediatr 2018;6:285. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00285.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
8. Wynn, JL, Polin, RA. Progress in the management of neonatal sepsis: the importance of a consensus definition. Pediatr Res 2018;83:13–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2017.224.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Schlapbach, LJ, Kissoon, N. Defining pediatric sepsis. JAMA Pediatr 2018;172:312–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5208.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Procianoy, RS, Silveira, RC. The challenges of neonatal sepsis management. J Pediatr 2020;96:80–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2019.10.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
11. Espy, MJ, Uhl, JR, Sloan, LM, Buckwalter, SP, Jones, MF, Vetter, EA, et al.. Real-time PCR in clinical microbiology: applications for routine laboratory testing. Clin Microbiol Rev 2006;19:165–256. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.19.1.165-256.2006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
12. Pammi, M, Flores, A, Leeflang, M, Versalovic, J. Molecular assays in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2011;128:e973–85. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-1208.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
13. Oeser, C, Pond, M, Butcher, P, Bedford Russell, A, Henneke, P, Laing, K, et al.. PCR for the detection of pathogens in neonatal early onset sepsis. PLoS One 2020;15:e0226817. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226817.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
14. Kim, CJ, Romero, R, Chaemsaithong, P, Chaiyasit, N, Yoon, BH, Kim, YM. Acute chorioamnionitis and funisitis: definition, pathologic features, and clinical significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213:S29–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.040.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
15. Janota, J, Stranák, Z, Bĕlohlávková, S, Mudra, K, Simák, J. Postnatal increase of procalcitonin in premature newborns is enhanced by chorioamnionitis and neonatal sepsis. Eur J Clin Invest 2001;31:978–83. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2362.2001.00912.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
16. Chiesa, C, Pellegrini, G, Panero, A, Osborn, JF, Signore, F, Assumma, M, et al.. C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and procalcitonin in the immediate postnatal period: influence of illness severity, risk status, antenatal and perinatal complications, and infection. Clin Chem 2003;49:60–8. https://doi.org/10.1373/49.1.60.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
17. Simonsen, KA, Anderson-Berry, AL, Delair, SF, Davies, HD. Early-onset neonatal sepsis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2014;27:21–47. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00031-13.Search in Google Scholar
18. Puopolo, K, Benitz, WE, Zaoutis, TE, AAP Committee on Fetus and Newborn, AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases. Management of neonates born ≤34 6/7 weeks gestation with suspected or proven early-onset bacterial sepsis. Pediatrics 2018;142:e20182896. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-2896.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
19. Horbar, JD. The Vermont Oxford Network: evidence-based quality improvement for neonatology. Pediatrics 1999;103:350–9.10.1542/peds.103.SE1.350Search in Google Scholar
20. Pammi, M, Flores, A, Versalovic, J, Leeflang, MM. Molecular assays for the diagnosis of sepsis in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;2:CD011926. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011926.pub2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
21. Cantey, JB, Baird, SD. Ending the culture of culture-negative sepsis in the neonatal ICU. Pediatrics 2017;140:e20170044. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-0044.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
22. Bustin, SA, Benes, V, Garson, JA, Hellemans, J, Huggett, J, Kubista, M, et al.. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem 2009;55:611–22. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
23. Delcò, C, Karam, O, Pfister, R, Gervaix, A, Renzi, G, Emonet, S, et al.. Rapid detection and ruling out of neonatal sepsis by PCR coupled with Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry (PCR/ESI-MS). Early Hum Dev 2017;108:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.03.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
© 2021 Zbyněk Straňák et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Corner of Academy
- Cost of providing cell-free DNA screening for Down syndrome in Finland using different strategies
- Adverse perinatal outcomes following the prenatal diagnosis of isolated single umbilical artery in singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Original Articles – Obstetrics
- Perinatal outcomes in women with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection: comparison with contemporary and matched pre-COVID-19 controls
- The postpartum period during the COVID-19 pandemic: investigating Turkish women’s postpartum support and postpartum-specific anxiety
- First-line noninvasive management of cytomegalovirus primary infection in pregnancy
- Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of clinically significant placenta accreta spectrum disorders
- Improved management of placenta accreta spectrum disorders: experience from a single institution
- A randomized controlled trial of two-doses of vaginal progesterone 400 vs. 200 mg for prevention of preterm labor in twin gestations
- The impact of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy on prenatal screening
- Original Articles – Fetus
- Myocardial deformation analysis in late-onset small-for-gestational-age and growth-restricted fetuses using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a prospective cohort study
- HDlive Flow Silhouette with spatiotemporal image correlation for assessment of fetal cardiac structures at 12 to 14 + 6 weeks of gestation
- Umbilical artery pulsatility index and half-peak systolic velocity in second- and third-trimester fetuses with trisomy 18 and 13
- Original Articles – Neonates
- Pulmonary hypertension in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: risk factors, mortality and duration of hospitalisation
- Outcomes from birth to 6 months of publicly insured infants born to mothers with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in the United States
- Placental findings are not associated with neurodevelopmental outcome in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy – an 11-year single-center experience
- High frequency band limits in spectral analysis of heart rate variability in preterm infants
- Bacterial DNA detection in very preterm infants assessed for risk of early onset sepsis
- Short Communication
- Healthcare workers’ attitudes about vaccination of pregnant women and those wishing to become pregnant
- Letter to the Editors
- Comment on Abdel Wahab et al.: A randomized controlled trial of two-doses of vaginal progesterone 400 vs. 200 mg for prevention of preterm labor in twin gestations
- Re: Comment on Abdel Wahab et al.: A randomized controlled trial of two-doses of vaginal progesterone 400 vs. 200 mg for prevention of preterm labor in twin gestations
- SARS-CoV-2 behavior, through the eyes of a perinatologist?
- Re: SARS-CoV-2 behavior, through the eyes of a perinatologist?
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Corner of Academy
- Cost of providing cell-free DNA screening for Down syndrome in Finland using different strategies
- Adverse perinatal outcomes following the prenatal diagnosis of isolated single umbilical artery in singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Original Articles – Obstetrics
- Perinatal outcomes in women with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection: comparison with contemporary and matched pre-COVID-19 controls
- The postpartum period during the COVID-19 pandemic: investigating Turkish women’s postpartum support and postpartum-specific anxiety
- First-line noninvasive management of cytomegalovirus primary infection in pregnancy
- Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of clinically significant placenta accreta spectrum disorders
- Improved management of placenta accreta spectrum disorders: experience from a single institution
- A randomized controlled trial of two-doses of vaginal progesterone 400 vs. 200 mg for prevention of preterm labor in twin gestations
- The impact of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy on prenatal screening
- Original Articles – Fetus
- Myocardial deformation analysis in late-onset small-for-gestational-age and growth-restricted fetuses using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a prospective cohort study
- HDlive Flow Silhouette with spatiotemporal image correlation for assessment of fetal cardiac structures at 12 to 14 + 6 weeks of gestation
- Umbilical artery pulsatility index and half-peak systolic velocity in second- and third-trimester fetuses with trisomy 18 and 13
- Original Articles – Neonates
- Pulmonary hypertension in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: risk factors, mortality and duration of hospitalisation
- Outcomes from birth to 6 months of publicly insured infants born to mothers with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in the United States
- Placental findings are not associated with neurodevelopmental outcome in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy – an 11-year single-center experience
- High frequency band limits in spectral analysis of heart rate variability in preterm infants
- Bacterial DNA detection in very preterm infants assessed for risk of early onset sepsis
- Short Communication
- Healthcare workers’ attitudes about vaccination of pregnant women and those wishing to become pregnant
- Letter to the Editors
- Comment on Abdel Wahab et al.: A randomized controlled trial of two-doses of vaginal progesterone 400 vs. 200 mg for prevention of preterm labor in twin gestations
- Re: Comment on Abdel Wahab et al.: A randomized controlled trial of two-doses of vaginal progesterone 400 vs. 200 mg for prevention of preterm labor in twin gestations
- SARS-CoV-2 behavior, through the eyes of a perinatologist?
- Re: SARS-CoV-2 behavior, through the eyes of a perinatologist?