Home Is there a sex difference in fetal behavior? A comparison of the KANET test between male and female fetuses
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Is there a sex difference in fetal behavior? A comparison of the KANET test between male and female fetuses

  • Toshiyuki Hata EMAIL logo , Uiko Hanaoka , Mohamed Ahmed Mostafa AboEllail , Rina Uematsu , Junko Noguchi , Takashi Kusaka and Asim Kurjak
Published/Copyright: March 4, 2016

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the sex difference in fetal behavior between male and female fetuses.

Methods: Fetal behavior was assesed by Kurjak’s antenatal neurodevelopmental test (KANET) using four-dimensional (4D) ultrasound between 28 and 39 weeks of gestation. Fifty-nine male and 53 female fetuses in middle- and high-class nulliparaous Japanese women were studied. The total value of the KANET score and values of each parameter (eight parameters) were compared.

Results: The total KANET score was normal in both groups, and there was no significant difference in the total KANET score. When individual KANET parameters were compared, no significant differences were noted in all eight parameters.

Conclusion: Our results show that there is no difference in fetal behavior between male and female fetuses in the third trimester of pregnancy. These results suggest that 4D ultrasound study examining fetal behavior does not need to consider the factor of fetal sex.


Corresponding author: Toshiyuki Hata, MD, PhD, Department of Perinatology and Gynecology, Kagawa University Graduate School of Medicine, 1750-1 Ikenobe, Miki, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan, Tel.: +81-(0)87-891-2174, Fax: +81-(0)87-891-2175, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The work reported in this paper was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas “Constructive Developmental Science” (No. 24119004), and Research Grant (No. 25462561) from The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.

References

[1] Korner AF. Neonatal startles, smiles, erections, and reflex sucks as related to state, sex, and individuality. Child Dev. 1969;40:1039–53.10.2307/1127010Search in Google Scholar

[2] Jacklin CN, Snow ME, Maccoby EE. Tactile sensitivity and muscle strength in newborn boys and girls. Infant Behav Dev. 1981;4:261–8.10.1016/S0163-6383(81)80028-8Search in Google Scholar

[3] de Vries JIP, Visser GHA, Prechtl HFR. The emergence of fetal behaviour. III. Individual differences and consistencies. Early Hum Dev. 1988;16:85–103.10.1016/0378-3782(88)90089-8Search in Google Scholar

[4] Hepper PG, Shannon EA, Dornan JC. Sex differences in fetal mouth movements. Lancet. 1997;350:1820.10.1016/S0140-6736(05)63635-5Search in Google Scholar

[5] Robles de Medina PG, Visser GHA, Huizink AC, Buitelaar JK, Mulder EJH. Fetal behaviour does not differ between boys and girls. Early Hum Dev. 2003;73:17–26.10.1016/S0378-3782(03)00047-1Search in Google Scholar

[6] DiPietro JA, Hodgson DM, Costigan KA, Hilton SC, Johnson TRB. Fetal neurobehavioral development. Child Dev. 1996;67: 2553–67.10.2307/1131640Search in Google Scholar

[7] Pressman EK, DiPietro JA, Costigan KA, Shupe AK, Johnson TRB. Fetal neurobehavioral development: Associations with socioeconomic class and fetal sex. Dev Psychobiol. 1998;33:79–91.10.1002/(SICI)1098-2302(199807)33:1<79::AID-DEV7>3.0.CO;2-PSearch in Google Scholar

[8] Kurjak A, Miskovic B, Stanojević M, Amiel-Tison C, Ahmed B, Azumendi G, et al. New scoring system for fetal neurobehavior assessed by three- and four-dimensional sonography. J Perinat Med. 2008;36:73–81.10.1515/JPM.2008.007Search in Google Scholar

[9] Stanojević M, Talic A, Miskovic B, Vasilj O, Shaddad AN, Ahmed B, et al. An attempt to standardize Kurjak’s antenatal neurodevelopmental test: Osaka consensus statement. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;5: 317–29.10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1209Search in Google Scholar

[10] Hanaoka U, Hata T, Kanenishi K, AboEllail MAM, Uematsu R, Konishi Y, et al. Does ethnicity have an effect on fetal behavior? A comparison of Asian and Caucasian populations. J Perinat Med. 2016;44:217–21.10.1515/jpm-2015-0036Search in Google Scholar

[11] Hepper PG, Dornan JC, Lynch C. Sex differences in fetal habituation. Dev Sci. 2012;15:373–83.10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01132.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Tranquilli AL, Lorenzi S, Buscicchio G, Di Tommaso M, Mazzanti L, Emanuelli M. Female fetuses are more reactive when mother eats chocolate. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27:72–4.10.3109/14767058.2013.804053Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Kurjak A, Talic A, Honemeyer U, Stanojevic M, Zalud I. Comparison between antenatal neurodevelopmental test and fetal Doppler in the assessment of fetal well being. J Parinata Med. 2013;41:107–14.10.1515/jpm-2012-0018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Athanasiadis AP, Mikos T, Tambakoudis GP, Theodoridis TD, Papastergiou M, Assimakopoulos E, Tarlatzis BC. Neurodevelopmental fetal assessment using KANET scoring system in low and high-risk pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26:363–8.10.3109/14767058.2012.695824Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Antsaklis P, Kurjak A, Izebegovic S. Functional test for fetal brain: The role of KANET test. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;7:385–99.10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1309Search in Google Scholar

  1. The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Received: 2015-11-13
Accepted: 2016-2-8
Published Online: 2016-3-4
Published in Print: 2016-7-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Preventing preterm birth
  4. Original articles
  5. Vertically transmitted cytomegalovirus infection in newborn preterm infants
  6. Computerized vital signs analysis and late onset infections in extremely low gestational age infants
  7. Oral propranolol in early stages of retinopathy of prematurity
  8. Changes in incidence of iatrogenic and spontaneous preterm births over time: a population-based study
  9. Predictive factors for preterm delivery under rural conditions in post-tsunami Banda Aceh
  10. Early pregnancy serum neopterin concentrations predict spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic pregnant women
  11. Funisitis is more common in cervical insufficiency than in preterm labor and preterm premature rupture of membranes
  12. Amniotic fluid LPCAT1 mRNA correlates with the lamellar body count
  13. Recommendation and Guidelines for Perinatal Practice
  14. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound
  15. Original articles - Obstetrics
  16. Relationship between first-trimester serum placental protein-13 and maternal characteristics, placental Doppler studies and pregnancy outcome
  17. Higher D-dimer level in the early third trimester predicts the occurrence of postpartum hemorrhage
  18. Extra-abdominal removal of placenta during cesarean section: a prospective randomized controlled trial of a novel technique
  19. Correlation of intrapartum translabial ultrasound parameters with computed tomographic 3D reconstruction of the female pelvis
  20. Cost effectiveness of universal umbilical cord blood gas and lactate analysis in a tertiary level maternity unit
  21. Original articles - Fetus
  22. Is there a sex difference in fetal behavior? A comparison of the KANET test between male and female fetuses
  23. Determination of antepartum and intrapartum risk factors associated with neonatal intensive care unit admission
  24. Short communication
  25. A guide on how to build a novel home-made part task training simulator for cervical cerclage training
  26. Congress Calendar
  27. Congress Calendar
Downloaded on 8.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2015-0387/html
Scroll to top button