Home Technology Underwater wireless optical communications links: perspectives, challenges and recent trends
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Underwater wireless optical communications links: perspectives, challenges and recent trends

  • , , EMAIL logo and
Published/Copyright: August 17, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Underwater wireless optical communication (UOWC) systems have lately garnered a significant amount of attention for both academic purposes and trial applications. Although the idea is not new, the fact that seawater has a smaller window of absorption for blue-green light has reawakened interest in it, and it has grown an essential attraction because of its high bandwidth, it can cover a wide variety of underwater activities as compared to radio frequency and acoustic technologies. To monitor pollution, maintain oil pipelines, monitor climate change, conduct offshore investigations, and conduct oceanography research, the wireless transmission of information underwater technology is of importance to the military, industrial, and scientific organizations all around the world. The use of wavelengths of visible light to transmit secure data across point-to-point connections in underwater optical wireless communication (UOWC) compares well with the usage of free-space optical (FSO) communications. However, UWOC systems also have a huge amount of absorption and scattering introduced by the aquatic channels. Different from standard terrestrial free-space optical communication, many unique system design strategies have been investigated in recent years to solve these technological issues. This article presents a vision as well as various obstacles in the domain of underwater optical wireless communication, a detailed overview, and comparison of underwater communications techniques (UOWC) links, basic modulation technique techniques, and c pursuits on UWOC.


Corresponding author: Mazin Ali A. Ali, Physics Department, Mustansiryah University, College of Science, Baghdad, Iraq, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Ali, A, Zhang, Ch, Hassnain, SA, Lyu, W, Tehseen, R, Chen, X, et al.. Underwater wireless-to-plastic optical fiber communication systems with a passive front end. In: 2019 18th International Conference on Optical Communications and Networks (ICOCN). IEEE; 2019:1–3 pp.10.1109/ICOCN.2019.8934143Search in Google Scholar

2. Ooi, BS, Kong, M, Ng, TK. Underwater wireless optical communications: opportunity, challenges and future prospects commentary on “Recent progress in and perspectives of underwater wireless optical communication”. Prog Quant Electron 2020;73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pquantelec.2020.100275.Search in Google Scholar

3. Zeng, Z, Fu, S, Zhang, H, Dong, Y, Cheng, J. A survey of underwater optical wireless communications. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 2017;19:204–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2016.2618841.Search in Google Scholar

4. Kaushal, H, Kaddoum, G. Underwater optical wireless communication. IEEE Access 2016;4:1518–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2016.2552538.Search in Google Scholar

5. Alomari, MM, Wafa, M, Rehab, A, Babhair, GG, Hemalatha, M. Vision and challenges of underwater optical wireless communication-A survey. Int J Comput Appl 2017;167:8–10. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2017914326.Search in Google Scholar

6. Kumar, S, Prince, Sh, Aravind, JV, Kumar, GS. Analysis on the effect of salinity in underwater wireless optical communication. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 2020;38:291–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119x.2019.1569739.Search in Google Scholar

7. Mehde, MS, Taha, SAA, Ahmed, AA. The optimum conditions for arc fusion to splice photonic crystal fiber and single mode optical fiber. Eng Technol J 2015;33:101–13.10.30684/etj.33.1A.9Search in Google Scholar

8. Adnan, SA, Abdulwahhab, AW, Ismail, SN. Fusion splicing: the penalty of increasing the collapse length of the air holes in ESM-12B photonic crystal fibers. Opt Appl 2016;46.Search in Google Scholar

9. Alkhazragi, O. Wavelength dependence of underwater turbulence characterized using laser-based white light. Saudi Arabia: KAUST Research Repository; 2019.Search in Google Scholar

10. Khalighi, MA, Gabriel, C, Hamza, T, Bourennane, S, Léon, P, Rigaud, V. Underwater wireless optical communication; recent advances and remaining challenges. In: 2014 16th international conference on transparent optical networks (ICTON). IEEE; 2014:1–4 pp.10.1109/ICTON.2014.6876673Search in Google Scholar

11. Mahdy, A, Deogun, JS. Wireless optical communications: a survey. In: 2004 IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (IEEE Cat. No. 04TH8733). IEEE; 2004, vol. 4:2399–404 pp.Search in Google Scholar

12. Adnan, SA, Ali, MA, Sadeq, M, Kadhim, AC, Riaz, M. Investigating link budget of underwater wireless optical communication with intensity modulation direct detection technique. In: Light, energy and the environment, OSA Technical Digest (online). Optica Publishing Group paper JW5A.13; 2017.10.1364/PV.2017.JW5A.13Search in Google Scholar

13. Fu, Y. BER of underwater wireless optical communication systems with SIMO detection over strong oceanic turbulence. J Opt Commun 2022;43:311–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2018-0222.Search in Google Scholar

14. Zhu, S, Chen, X, Liu, X, Zhang, G, Tian, P. Recent progress in and perspectives of underwater wireless optical communication. Prog Quant Electron 2020;73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pquantelec.2020.100274.Search in Google Scholar

15. Adnan, SA, Hassan, HA, Alchalaby, A, Kadhim, AC. Experimental study of underwater wireless optical communication from clean water to turbid harbor under various conditions. Int J Des Nat Ecodyn 2021;16:219–26. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijdne.160212.Search in Google Scholar

16. Sozer, EM, Stojanovic, M, Proakis, JG. Underwater acoustic networks. IEEE J Ocean Eng 2000;25:72–83. https://doi.org/10.1109/48.820738.Search in Google Scholar

17. Tawfiq, ZH, Fakhri, MA, Adnan, SA. Photonic crystal fibres PCF for different sensors in review. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering. Istanbul, Turkey: IOP Publishing; 2018.10.1088/1757-899X/454/1/012173Search in Google Scholar

18. Qu, F, Wang, Z, Yang, L, Wu, Z. A journey toward modeling and resolving Doppler in underwater acoustic communications. IEEE Commun Mag 2016;54:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2016.7402260.Search in Google Scholar

19. Adnan, SA, Mazin, AA, Kadhim, AC, Sadeq, M, Riaz, M. Investigating the performance of underwater wireless optical communication with intensity modulation direct detection technique. In: Light, energy and the environment. Boulder, Colorado: Optica Publishing Group; 2017.10.1364/PV.2017.JW5A.14Search in Google Scholar

20. Che, X, Wells, I, Dickers, G, Kear, P, Gong, X. Re-evaluation of RF electromagnetic communication in underwater sensor networks. IEEE Commun Mag 2010;48:143–51. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2010.5673085.Search in Google Scholar

21. Oubei, HM. Underwater wireless optical communications systems: from system-level demonstrations to channel modeling. MOC; 2018:34–35 pp.10.23919/MOC.2017.8244482Search in Google Scholar

22. Mesleh, R, Elgala, H, Haas, H. On the performance of different OFDM based optical wireless communication systems. J Opt Commun Netw 2011;3:620–8. https://doi.org/10.1364/jocn.3.000620.Search in Google Scholar

23. Taleb, SM, Fakhri, MA, Adnan, SA. Optical investigations of nanophotonic LiNbO3 films deposited by pulsed laser deposition method. In: Defect and diffusion forum. Trans Tech Publ; 2020:16–22 pp.10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.398.16Search in Google Scholar

24. Taleb, SM, Fakhri, MA, Adnan, SA. Substrate and annealing temperatures effects on the structural results of LiNbO3 photonic films using PLD method. In: AIP conference proceedings. AIP Publishing LLC; 2020:020234 p.10.1063/5.0000197Search in Google Scholar

25. Khashan, SK, Salem, ET, Fakhery, MA. Enhanced the response time of the P-N junction photodetector. Eng Technol J 2008;26:423–8.10.30684/etj.29.4.3Search in Google Scholar

26. Sajmath, P, Ravi, RV, Majeed, KA. Underwater wireless optical communication systems: a survey. In: 2020 7th international conference on smart structures and systems (ICSSS). IEEE; 2020:1–7 pp.10.1109/ICSSS49621.2020.9202150Search in Google Scholar

27. Mohsan, SAH, Mehedi Hasan, Md, Mazinani, A, Sadiq, MA, Akhtar, MH, Islam, A, et al.. A systematic review on practical considerations, recent advances and research challenges in underwater optical wireless communication. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 2020;11. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0110722.Search in Google Scholar

28. Johnson, LJ, Faezah, J, Roger, G, Leeson, MS. Recent advances in underwater optical wireless communications. Underw Technol: Int J Soc Underwater 2014;32:167–75. https://doi.org/10.3723/ut.32.167.Search in Google Scholar

29. Spagnolo, GS, Cozzella, L, Leccese, F. Underwater optical wireless communications: overview. Sensors (Basel) 2020;20:2261. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20082261.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Saad, F, Adnan, SA, Mazin Ali, AA. Performance of underwater wireless optical communication system under salty water. Indian J Nat Sci 2019;9.Search in Google Scholar

31. Solonenko, MG, Mobley, CD. Inherent optical properties of Jerlov water types. Appl Opt 2015;54:5392–401. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.54.005392.Search in Google Scholar

32. Chancey, MA. Short range underwater optical communication links [MSc. thesis]. North Carolina University: 2005.Search in Google Scholar

33. Akkaynak, D, Treibitz, T, Shlesinger, T, Loya, Y, Tamir, R, Iluz, D. What is the space of attenuation coefficients in underwater computer vision? In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR). CVPR; 2017:568–77 pp.10.1109/CVPR.2017.68Search in Google Scholar

34. Adnan, SA, Alchalaby, A, Hassan, HA. Future optimization algorithm to estimate attenuation in 532 nm laser beam of UWOC-channel: improved neural network model. Math Model Eng Probl 2021;8:453–60. https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.080316.Search in Google Scholar

35. Mecherle, GS, Young, EYS, Bullock, AM. Underwater-airborne laser communication system: characterization of the channel. In: Free-space laser communication technologies XV; 2003.Search in Google Scholar

36. Gkoura, LK, Roumelas, GD, Nistazakis, HE, Sandalidis, H, Vavoulas, A, Tombras, AdTaS. Underwater optical wireless communication systems: a concise review. In: Turbulence modelling approaches – current state, development prospects, applications. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2017.10.5772/67915Search in Google Scholar

37. Ali, MAA. Investigation of multiple input–single output technique for wireless optical communication system under coastal water. Opt Quant Electron 2020;52:416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-020-02534-y.Search in Google Scholar

38. Ali, MF, Jayakody, DNK, Li, Y. Recent trends in underwater visible light communication (UVLC) systems. IEEE Access 2022;10:22169–225. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3150093.Search in Google Scholar

39. Mazin Ali, AA, Adnan, SA, Sadeq, M. Underwater wireless optical communication system modulate 532 nm. Elixir Int J 2017;113:49051–3.Search in Google Scholar

40. Murgod, TR, Sundaram, SM. Survey on underwater optical wireless communication: perspectives and challenges. Indonesian J Electric Eng Comput Sci 2019;13:138–46. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v13.i1.pp138-146.Search in Google Scholar

41. Cox, WC. A 1 Mbps underwater communication system using a 405 nm laser diode and photomultiplier tube [MSc. thesis]. North Carolina University: 2008.Search in Google Scholar

42. Adnan, S, Ali, M, Hakwar, F. The air bubbles effect for underwater optical wireless communication using 650 nm wavelength. Eng Technol J 2019;37:398–403. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.37.10a.3.Search in Google Scholar

43. Jasman, F. Modelling and characterisation of short range underwater optical wireless communication channels [Ph.D. thesis]. University of Warwick: 2016.Search in Google Scholar

44. Arnon, S, Barry, J, Karagiannidis, G, Schober, R, Uysal, M. Advanced optical wireless communication systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012:388–92 pp.10.1017/CBO9780511979187Search in Google Scholar

45. Gawdi, YJ. Underwater free space optics [MSc. thesis]. North Carolina University: 2006.Search in Google Scholar

46. Haltrin, VI. Chlorophyll-based model of seawater optical properties. Appl Opt 1999;38:6826–32. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.38.006826.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

47. Baiden, G, Bissiri, Y, Masoti, A. Paving the way for a future underwater omni-directional wireless optical communication systems. Ocean Eng 2009;36:633–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.03.007.Search in Google Scholar

48. Premože, S, Ashikhmin, M, Tessendorf, J, Ramamoorthi, R, Nayar, S. Practical rendering of multiple scattering effects in participating media. In: Proc. of the 15th eurographics conference on rendering techniques (EGSR’04). Goslar, DEU: Eurographics Association; 2004:363–74 pp.Search in Google Scholar

49. Green, R, Joshi, H, Higgins, MD, Leeson, MS. Recent developments in indoor optical wireless systems. IET Commun 2008;2:3–10. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com:20060475.10.1049/iet-com:20060475Search in Google Scholar

50. Proakis, JG, Salehi, M. Digital communications. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001, vol 4.Search in Google Scholar

51. Anguita, D, Brizzolara, D, Parodi, G. VHDL modules and circuits for underwater optical wireless communication systems. WSEAS Trans Commun 2010;9:525–52.Search in Google Scholar

52. Chen, H, Chen, X, Lu, J, Liu, X, Shi, J, Zheng, L, et al.. Toward long-distance underwater wireless optical communication based on A high-sensitivity single photon avalanche diode. IEEE Photonics J 2020;12:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/jphot.2020.2985205.Search in Google Scholar

53. Akar, HAR, Kasim, NK, Jasim, NA. Power management of LED street lighting system based on FPGA. Eng Technol J 2014;32:453–64.10.30684/etj.32.2A.12Search in Google Scholar

54. Mohammed, JA. Pulse width modulation for DC motor control based on LM324. Eng Technol J 2013;31:1882–96.10.30684/etj.31.10A6Search in Google Scholar

55. Sui, M, Zhou, Z. The modified PPM modulation for underwater wireless optical communication. In: 2009 international conference on communication software and networks; 2009:173–7 pp.10.1109/ICCSN.2009.95Search in Google Scholar

56. Oubei, HM, Duran, JR, Janjua, B, Wang, HY, Tsai, CT, Chi, YC, et al.. 4.8 Gbit/s 16-QAM-OFDM transmission based on compact 450-nm laser for underwater wireless optical communication. Opt Express 2015;23:23302–9. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.23.023302.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

57. Oubei, HM, Li, C, Park, KH, Ng, TK, Alouini, MS, Ooi, BS. 2.3 Gbit/s underwater wireless optical communications using directly modulated 520 nm laser diode. Opt Express 2015;23:20743–8. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.23.020743.Search in Google Scholar

58. Shen, C, Guo, Y, Oubei, HM, Ng, TK, Liu, G, Park, KH, et al.. 20-meter underwater wireless optical communication link with 1.5 Gbps data rate. Opt Express 2016;24:25502–9. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.24.025502.Search in Google Scholar

59. Lu, HH, Li, CY, Lin, HH, Tsai, WS, Chu, CA, Chen, BR, et al.. An 8 m/9.6 Gbps underwater wireless optical communication system. IEEE Photonics J 2016;8:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/jphot.2016.2601778.Search in Google Scholar

60. Liu, X, Yi, S, Zhou, X, Fang, Z, Qiu, ZJ, Hu, L, et al.. 34.5 m underwater optical wireless communication with 2.70 Gbps data rate based on a green laser diode with NRZ-OOK modulation. Opt Express 2017;25:27937–47. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.25.027937.Search in Google Scholar

61. Li, CY, Lu, HH, Tsai, WS, Chen, MT, Ho, CM, Wang, YC, et al.. 16 Gb/s PAM4 UWOC system based on 488-nm LD with light injection and optoelectronic feedback techniques. Opt Express 2017;25:11598–605. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.25.011598.Search in Google Scholar

62. Huang, XH, Li, CY, Lu, HH, Su, CW, Wu, YR, Wang, ZH, et al.. 6-m/10-Gbps underwater wireless red-light laser transmission system. Opt Eng 2018;57. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.oe.57.6.066110.Search in Google Scholar

63. Fei, C, Zhang, J, Zhang, G, Wu, Y, Hong, X, He, S. Demonstration of 15-M 7.33-Gb/s 450-nm underwater wireless optical discrete multitone transmission using post nonlinear equalization. J Lightwave Technol 2018;36:728–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2017.2780841.Search in Google Scholar

64. Wang, J, Lu, C, Li, S, Xu, Z. 100 m/500 Mbps underwater optical wireless communication using an NRZ-OOK modulated 520 nm laser diode. Opt Express 2019;27:12171–81. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.27.012171.Search in Google Scholar

65. Zhao, M, Li, X, Chen, X, Zhijian, T, Lyu, W, Zhang, Z, et al.. Long-reach underwater wireless optical communication with relaxed link alignment enabled by optical combination and arrayed sensitive receivers. Opt Express 2020;28:34450–60. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.410026.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-04-18
Accepted: 2022-07-13
Published Online: 2022-08-17
Published in Print: 2024-10-28

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Detectors
  3. Performance investigation of DPMZM based RoF system by employing PIN and APD photodetector
  4. Devices
  5. Analysis of interferometric configuration for optical devices
  6. Fibers
  7. Applications of photonic crystal fibers in optical communication
  8. An accurate but simple method for estimation of the influence of kerr nonlinearity on the far field pattern of LP11 mode in dispersion-shifted and dispersion-flattened fibers
  9. Ambient refractive index sensitivity of long-period fiber grating (LPFG) with reduced cladding thickness using three-layer fiber geometry approach
  10. Research on novel single-mode polarization maintaining photonic crystal fiber
  11. Networks
  12. Wavelength division multiplexed radio-over-fiber (WDM-RoF) system for next-generation networks with dispersion compensating fiber
  13. A simple chaotic base encryption scheme for securing OFDM-PON communications
  14. Performance Investigations of Symmetric 80 Gbps TWDM NG-PON2 coexisting with GPON/XG-PON
  15. Investigation of link due to atmospheric turbulence in free space optical communication for optical wireless terrestrial networks
  16. Performance analysis of WDM-ROF network with different receiver filters
  17. Optimization-enabled user pairing algorithm for energy-efficient resource allocation for noma heterogeneous networks
  18. Systems
  19. A comprehensive study on radio over fiber systems: present evaluations and future challenges
  20. Nonlinear effects on WDM optical communication system
  21. Nonlinearity mitigation of self-phase modulation effect in coherent optical system
  22. Performance evaluation of MDM-FSO transmission system for varying atmospheric conditions
  23. Design and performance optimization of 96 x 40 Gbps CSRZ based DWDM long-haul system
  24. Survey on acquisition, tracking and pointing (ATP) systems and beam profile correction techniques in FSO communication systems
  25. Security enhancement of visible light communication system using proposed 2D-WMZCC codes under the effects of eavesdropper
  26. 400 Gb/s free space optical communication (FSOC) system using OAM multiplexing and PDM-QPSK with DSP
  27. Inter-satellite optical wireless communication (IsOWC) systems challenges and applications: a comprehensive review
  28. Underwater wireless optical communications links: perspectives, challenges and recent trends
  29. A hybrid deep learning using reptile dragonfly search algorithm for reducing the PAPR in OFDM systems
  30. Theory
  31. Design and performance analysis of WDM-FSO communication system using Polarization Shift Keying
  32. Modelling of OFDM modulation technique in HF radio band using MATLAB
  33. Improve cardinality with two-dimensional unipolar (optical) orthogonal codes for multiple access interference
Downloaded on 24.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/joc-2022-0063/html
Scroll to top button