Startseite Crustal deformation in East of Cairo, Egypt, induced by rapid urbanization, as seen from remote sensing and GNSS data
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Crustal deformation in East of Cairo, Egypt, induced by rapid urbanization, as seen from remote sensing and GNSS data

  • Ahmed Nabil EMAIL logo , Mohamed El-Ashquer , Mohamed Saleh , Ashraf El-Kutb Mousa und Gamal Saber El-Fiky
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 5. Dezember 2024
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The area located East to Cairo, the Capital of Egypt, represents an obvious example for the rapid urban expansion, as it contains many new housing cities. Beside its socio-economic importance, it’s located in the Cairo-Suez seismic zone. We utilized Persistent Scatterer Interferometry (PSI) of 2015–2021 Sentinel-1 SAR scenes along with two GNSS stations (KATA and PHLW) to assess the distribution and rates of crustal deformation of this region. The PSI analysis is applied to 140 Sentinel-1 SAR images collected from the ascending track number (58) and the descending track number (167). The Bernese software V. 5.0 is used for the processing of the GNSS data. A good agreement between the rates estimated from the PSI analysis and GNSS data is observed. Based on results, most of the new cities showing land subsidence with variable rates. The rates at Obour, New Cairo, Shorouk, Madinty, and Capital Gardens are 0.54 ± 0.30 mm/year, 0.58 ± 0.30 mm/year, 1.01 ± 0.30 mm/year, 0.58 ± 0.30 mm/year, and 0.99 ± 0.30 mm/year, respectively. The highest recorded subsidence rates are at Asher, Administrative Capital, and Badr with 2.18 ± 0.30 mm/year, 1.89 ± 0.30 mm/year, and 1.69 ± 0.30 mm/year, respectively. Nasr city is the only city with an uplift of 0.82 ± 0.30 mm/year. Our new findings introduce the probable use of integrated techniques such as GNSS and InSAR to evaluate the extent of crustal deformation connected to rapid urbanization in arid areas. Beside tectonic setting, it should be considered while executing mega-projects for sustainable development especially within Egypt’s Vision 2030.


Corresponding author: Ahmed Nabil, Construction Engineering & Utilities Department, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt, E-mail: 

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express gratitude to the team of National Research Institute of Astronomy & Geophysics (NRIAG) for the field collection of GNSS data. We are also grateful for the European Space Agency (ESA) for its open-access policy to provide Sentinel-1 products. Most of the plots in this paper are generated using Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) V. 6.3. The SRTM30 Digital Elevation Model of 30-m resolution is downloaded from GMTSAR website.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: Data collection and Formal analysis, Ahmed Nabil; Methodology, Mohamed Elashquer; Validation, Mohamed Saleh; Writing – original draft, Ahmed Nabil; Final Reviewing, Ashraf Mousa and Gamal El-fiky. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: 1. InSAR Data: The analyzed datasets are available through the platforms of FRENCH ACCESS TO THE SENTINEL PRODUCTS (cnes peps: https://peps.cnes.fr/rocket/#/search?maxRecords=50&page=1) and/or through NASA EARTH DATA platform (Alaska Satellite Facility ASF: https://search.asf.alaska.edu/#/?zoom=9.127&center=31.124,30.001). 2. GNSS Data: The analyzed data were collected by a team of National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics (NRIAG). The data that support the findings of this study are available from [NRIAG] but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of [NRIAG]. Two of the authors are members of NRIAG.

References

1. Saleh, M, Becker, M. A new velocity field from the analysis of the Egyptian permanent GPS network (EPGN). Arabian J Geosci 2014;7:4665–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-1132-x.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Abou Elenean, K. Focal mechanisms of small and moderate size earthquakes recorded by the Egyptian national seismic network (ENSN), Egypt. NRIAG J Geophys 2007;6:119–53.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Badawy, A. Seismicity of Egypt. Seismol Res Lett 2005;76:149–60. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.76.2.149.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Badawy, A. Present-day seismicity, stress field and crustal deformation of Egypt. J Seismol 2005;9:267–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-005-2190-7.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Badawy, A, Omar, K, Gad-El-Kareem, AM, Mohamed, EK, Badreldin, H. Source characterizations of the New Cairo earthquake, Egypt. J Afr Earth Sci 2020;167:103846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2020.103846.Suche in Google Scholar

6. ElGharbawi, T, Fathy, M, Amin, AM, ElSharkawy, AA. Urban monitoring application in new administrative capital in Egypt using machine learning techniques and Sentinel 2 data. Port-Said Eng Res J 2022;26:22–31.Suche in Google Scholar

7. The Capital Egypt. The new administrative capital website. Available from: http://www.acud.eg/ [Accessed 10 Jan 2024].Suche in Google Scholar

8. Abdelaal, A, Lasheen, ESR, Mansour, AM, Mohamed, AW, Osman, MR, Khaleal, FM, et al.. Assessing the ecological and health risks associated with heavy metal pollution levels in sediments of Big Giftun and Abu Minqar Islands, East Hurghada, Red Sea, Egypt. Mar Pollut Bull 2024;198:115930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115930.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Saleh, M, Becker, M. New estimation of Nile delta subsidence rates from InSAR and GPS analysis. Environ Earth Sci 2019;78:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-8001-6.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Saleh, M, Masson, F, Mohamed, AMS, Boy, JP, Abou-Aly, N, Rayan, A. Recent ground deformation around lake Nasser using GPS and InSAR, Aswan, Egypt. Tectonophysics 2018;744:310–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2018.07.005.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Stanley, DJ, Warne, AG. Worldwide initiation of Holocene marine deltas by deceleration of sea-level rise. Science 1994;265:228–31. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.265.5169.228.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Negm, AM, Sakr, S, Abd-Elaty, I, Abd-Elhamid, HF. An overview of groundwater resources in Nile delta aquifer. In: Groundwater in the Nile delta. Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing; 2019:3–44 pp.10.1007/698_2017_193Suche in Google Scholar

13. Galloway, DL, Hudnut, KW, Ingebritsen, SE, Phillips, SP, Peltzer, G, Rogez, F, et al.. Detection of aquifer system compaction and land subsidence using interferometric synthetic aperture radar, Antelope Valley, Mojave Desert, California. Water Resour Res 1998;34:2573–85. https://doi.org/10.1029/98wr01285.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Othman, A, Abotalib, AZ. Land subsidence triggered by groundwater withdrawal under hyper-arid conditions: case study from Central Saudi Arabia. Environ Earth Sci 2019;78:243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8254-8.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Rateb, A, Kuo, CY. Quantifying vertical deformation in the Tigris–Euphrates basin due to the groundwater abstraction: insights from GRACE and Sentinel-1 satellites. Water 2019;11:1658. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081658.Suche in Google Scholar

16. EGSMA, The Egyptian Geological Survey and Mining Authority. Geological map of greater Cairo area with scale 1:100 000. A published national map. Cairo: EGSMA; 1983.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Abdel Tawab, S, Helal, A, Deweidar, H, El-Sayed, A. Surface tectonic features of 12 Oct., 1992 earthquake, Egypt, at the epicentral area. Ain Shams Scientific Bulletin; 1993.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Cakir, S, Hepguler, S, Ozturk, C, Korkmaz, M, Isleten, B, Atamaz, FC. Efficacy of therapeutic ultrasound for the management of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, controlled, and double-blind study. Am J Phys Med Rehab 2014;93:405–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/phm.0000000000000033.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Genidi, H, Saleh, M, Mohamed, AM, Othman, A, El Mahmoudi, A. Recent estimates of the ground deformation from remote sensing and terrestrial data around the high dam area, Aswan, Egypt. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci 2023;26:403–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2023.05.004.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Hooper, A, Segall, P, Zebker, H. Persistent scatterer interferometric synthetic aperture radar for crustal deformation analysis, with application to Volcán Alcedo, Galápagos. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 2007;112. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jb004763.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Dziewonski, AM, Chou, TA, Woodhouse, JH. Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 1981;86:2825–52. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb086ib04p02825.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Ekström, G, Nettles, M, Dziewoński, A. The global CMT project 2004–2010: centroid-moment tensors for 13,017 earthquakes. Phys Earth Planet In 2012;200:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2012.04.002.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Garfunkel, Z. Internal structure of the Dead Sea leaky transform (rift) in relation to plate kinematics. Tectonophysics 1981;80:81–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(81)90143-8.Suche in Google Scholar

24. McClusky, S, Reilinger, R, Mahmoud, S, Ben Sari, D, Tealeb, A. GPS constraints on Africa (Nubia) and Arabia plate motions. Geophys J Int 2003;155:126–38. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2003.02023.x.Suche in Google Scholar

25. El-Fiky, GS. Elastic strains and associated inelastic properties of earth crust around greater Cairo as deduced from GPS measurements. Alex Eng J 2002;41:465–74.Suche in Google Scholar

26. El-Fiky, GS. Crustal elastic stress field around greater Cairo city, Egypt, derived from GPS measurements. Sci Bull 2004;39:307–25.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Gamal, E-F, Reddy, C, Tealeb, A. GPS derived velocity and crustal strain field in the vicinity of Cairo city, Egypt. Geol Soc India 2004;63:449–52.Suche in Google Scholar

28. Kebeasy, R. Seismicity. The geology of Egypt, Said, R, editor. Rotterdam: AA Balkerma; 1990.Suche in Google Scholar

29. Abd El Monem, SM. Seismicity and recent crustal novement studies in and around the greater Cairo region, Egypt. Acta Geod Geophys Hung 2001;36:353–62. https://doi.org/10.1556/ageod.36.2001.3.11.Suche in Google Scholar

30. Issawy, EA, Radwan, AH, Ddhy, S, Rayan, A. Monitoring of recent crustal movements around Cairo by repeated gravity and geodetic observations. Contrib Geophys Geodes J 2010;40:173–84.Suche in Google Scholar

31. Zahran, KH, Mohamed, AMS, Salah, M, Yousef, MM, Omran, AA, Radwan, AM. Gravity observation and crustal deformation at Cairo region and its geodynamical implications. World Appl Sci J 2013;21:1721–8.Suche in Google Scholar

32. Mohamed, AMS, Mohamed, GEA, Omar, K, Nadia, AA. Present stage of recent crustal movements and seismicity within greater Cairo area, Egypt. J Seismol 2014;18:23–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-013-9397-9.Suche in Google Scholar

33. Hassan, GS. Geophysical and seismological investigations around Cairo, Egypt. In: Near surface geoscience 2016-22nd European meeting of environmental and engineering geophysics. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers; 2016, vol 2016:cp-495-00077 p.Suche in Google Scholar

34. Stern, RJ. Neoproterozoic formation and evolution of eastern desert continental crust–The importance of the infrastructure-superstructure transition. J Afr Earth Sci 2018;146:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2017.01.001.Suche in Google Scholar

35. Badawy, A. Historical seismicity of Egypt. Acta Geod Geophys Hung 1999;34:119–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03325564.Suche in Google Scholar

36. Ambraseys, NN, Melville, CP, Adams, RD. The seismicity of Egypt, Arabia and the Red Sea. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1994:201 p.10.1017/CBO9780511524912Suche in Google Scholar

37. Maamoun, M, Megahed, A, Allam, A. Seismicity of Egypt. Bull HIAG 1984;4:109–60.Suche in Google Scholar

38. Badawy, A, Al-Gabry, M, Girgis, M. Historical seismicity of Egypt, a study for previous catalogues producing revised weighted catalogue. In: The second Arab conf. for astro. and geoph. Cairo, Egypt; 2010.Suche in Google Scholar

39. Saleh, Mohamed. Recent strain rate and deformation field of Egypt by GPS and InSAR. Germany: Technische Universität Darmstadt; 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

40. Australian, Government. Geoscience Australia, website of Australian government. Available from: https://www.ga.gov.au/scientific-topics/positioning-navigation/geodesy/geodetic-techniques/interferometric-synthetic-aperture-radar [Accessed 10 Jan 2024].Suche in Google Scholar

41. ElGharbawi, T. Monitoring land subsidence in Egypt’s northern west coast using interferometric synthetic aperture radar. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 2023;10:709–14. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-x-1-w1-2023-709-2023.Suche in Google Scholar

42. The European Union. European space agency (ESA). Available from: https://sentinel.esa.int/web/sentinel/missions/sentinel-1/overview/mission-summary [Accessed 10 Jan 2024].Suche in Google Scholar

43. The French Republic, CNES, PEPS, French access to the Sentinel products. Available from: https://peps.cnes.fr/rocket/#/search?maxRecords=50&page=1 [Accessed 27 Aug 2021].Suche in Google Scholar

44. NASA. Alaska satellite facility, ASF data search, NASA. Available from: https://search.asf.alaska.edu/#/ [Accessed 27 Aug 2021].Suche in Google Scholar

45. Hooper, A, Bekaert, D, Spaans, K, Arıkan, M. Recent advances in SAR interferometry time series analysis for measuring crustal deformation. Tectonophysics 2012;514:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2011.10.013.Suche in Google Scholar

46. Ferretti, A, Prati, C, Rocca, F. Permanent scatterers in SAR interferometry. IEEE Trans Geosci Rem Sens 2001;39:8–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.898661.Suche in Google Scholar

47. Dong, Y, Meng, G, Hong, S. Coseismic and postseismic deformation of the 2016 M w 6.6 aketao earthquake from InSAR observations and modelling. Pure Appl Geophys 2020;177:265–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02092-9.Suche in Google Scholar

48. Dach, R, Hugentobler, U, Fridez, P, Meindl, M. Bernese GPS software version 5.0 manual. Switzerland: Astronomical Institue, University of Berne; 2007.Suche in Google Scholar

49. Saleh, M, Elhadidy, M, Masson, F, Rayan, A, Mohamed, AMS, Abou-Aly, N. Earthquake recurrence estimation of Dahshour area, Cairo, Egypt, using earthquake and GPS data. Nat Hazards 2023;116:3565–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-05825-1.Suche in Google Scholar

50. Altamimi, Z, Métivier, L, Rebischung, P, Rouby, H, Collilieux, X. ITRF2014 plate motion model. Geophys J Int 2017;209:1906–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx136.Suche in Google Scholar

51. Goudarzi, MA, Cocard, M, Santerre, R. EPC: Matlab software to estimate Euler pole parameters. GPS Solut 2014;18:153–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-013-0354-4.Suche in Google Scholar

52. Fialko, Y, Simons, M, Agnew, D. The complete (3-D) surface displacement field in the epicentral area of the 1999 Mw7. 1 hector mine earthquake, California, from space geodetic observations. Geophys Res Lett 2001;28:3063–6. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gl013174.Suche in Google Scholar

53. Wang, X, Liu, G, Yu, B, Dai, K, Zhang, R, Chen, Q, et al.. 3D coseismic deformations and source parameters of the 2010 Yushu earthquake (China) inferred from DInSAR and multiple-aperture InSAR measurements. Rem Sens Environ 2014;152:174–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.06.014.Suche in Google Scholar

54. Rateb, A, Abotalib, AZ. Inferencing the land subsidence in the Nile delta using Sentinel-1 satellites and GPS between 2015 and 2019. Sci Total Environ 2020;729:138868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138868.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2024-10-26
Accepted: 2024-11-11
Published Online: 2024-12-05
Published in Print: 2025-04-28

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Original Research Articles
  3. Locally robust Msplit estimation
  4. Extending geodetic networks for geo-monitoring by supervised point cloud matching
  5. Evaluation and homogenization of a marine gravity database from shipborne and satellite altimetry-derived gravity data over the coastal region of Nigeria
  6. Modelling geoid height errors for local areas based on data of global models
  7. Unmanned aerial vehicle-based aerial survey of mines in Shanxi Province based on image data
  8. Ionospheric TEC and its irregularities over Egypt: a comprehensive study of spatial and temporal variations using GOCE satellite data
  9. Monitoring of volcanic precursors using satellite data: the case of Taftan volcano in Iran
  10. Modeling of temperature deformations on the Dnister HPP dam (Ukraine)
  11. Impact of temporal resolution in global ionospheric models on satellite positioning during low and high solar activity years of solar cycle 24
  12. Comparative performance of PPP software packages in atmospheric delay estimation using GNSS data
  13. Assessment and fitting of high/ultra resolution global geopotential models using GNSS/levelling over Egypt
  14. An efficient ‘P1’ algorithm for dual mixed-integer least-squares problems with scalar real-valued parameters
  15. Spatio-temporal trajectory alignment for trajectory evaluation
  16. Monitoring of networked RTK reference stations for coordinate reference system realization and maintenance – case study of the Czech Republic
  17. Crustal deformation in East of Cairo, Egypt, induced by rapid urbanization, as seen from remote sensing and GNSS data
Heruntergeladen am 8.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jag-2024-0094/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen