Home Monitoring of volcanic precursors using satellite data: the case of Taftan volcano in Iran
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Monitoring of volcanic precursors using satellite data: the case of Taftan volcano in Iran

  • Mehdi Akhoondzadeh EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 16, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In recent weeks, there have been reports of gas emanations from the crater of the dormant Taftan volcano in Iran. In this study, due to the limitations of ground stations and the advantages of satellite remote sensing, it has been tried to detect possible anomalies using the plasma data measured by Swarm (A, B and C) and GPS (Global Positioning System) satellites around the location of the mentioned volcano. Also, lithospheric and atmospheric data including OLR (Outgoing Longwave Radiation), water vapor, ozone, relative humidity, surface and air temperature, AOD (Aerosol Optical Depth), sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) using the Giovanni website in a period of about 5 months, were downloaded and analyzed. Using the median and interquartile method, possible anomalies were detected in the pre-processed time series of the desired parameters. To justify some of the non-volcanic anomalies, synoptic data including precipitation and temperature were prepared from the nearest ground station. By rejecting the possibility that some detected anomalies are related to volcanic activities, hypotheses were presented for other proposed anomalies. As a result of this research, the capabilities of Swarm satellites and GPS-TEC (Total Electron Content) are emphasized in studies related to the prediction, detection and tracking of volcanic activities and it is shown that by comparative comparison with other lithospheric and atmospheric precursors, uncertainty in eruption prediction can be reduced.


Corresponding author: Mehdi Akhoondzadeh, Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Department, School of Surveying and Geospatial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, North Amirabad Ave., Tehran, Iran, E-mail: 

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge the Space Weather Canada for the solar data that are freely available at https://www.spaceweather.gc.ca/solarflux/sx-5-flux-en.php, Giovanni web site for the atmospheric data that are freely available at http://giovanni.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/giovanni/, the European Space Agency (ESA) for the Swarm data that are freely available at HTTP or FTP (anonymous login) server: swarm-diss.eo.esa.int and NASA NOAA for the geomagnetic indices that are freely available at https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/geomag/indices/indices.html.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  4. Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict interest.

  5. Research funding: No funding.

  6. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

1. Brown, SK, Auker, MR, Sparks, RSJ. Populations around Holocene volcanoes and development of a population exposure index. In: Loughlin, SC, Sparks, RSJ, Brown, SK, Jenkins, SF, Vye Brown, C, editors. Global volcanic hazards and risk. Cambridge University Press; 2015:223–32 pp.10.1017/CBO9781316276273.006Search in Google Scholar

2. Alqahtani, F, Ehsan, M, Aboud, E, Abdulfarraj, M, El-Masry, N. Integrated approach using petrophysical, gravity, and magnetic data to evaluate the geothermal resources at the Rahat Volcanic Field, Saudi Arabia. Front Earth Sci 2023;11:1135635. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1135635.Search in Google Scholar

3. Coppola, D, Laiolo, M, Cigolini, C, Massimetti, F, Delle Donne, D, Ripepe, M, et al.. Thermal remote sensing for global volcano monitoring: experiences from the MIROVA system. Front Earth Sci 2020;7:362. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00362.Search in Google Scholar

4. Marchetti, D, Zhu, K, Zhang, H, Zhima, Z, Yan, R, Shen, X, et al.. Clues of lithosphere, atmosphere and ionosphere variations possibly related to the preparation of La Palma 19 september 2021 volcano eruption. Remote Sens 2022;14:5001. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14195001.Search in Google Scholar

5. Piscini, A, Marchetti, D, De Santis, A. Multi-parametric climatological analysis associated with global significant volcanic eruptions during 2002–2017. Pure Appl Geophys 2020;176:3629–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02147-x.Search in Google Scholar

6. Pritchard, ME, Simons, M. An InSAR-based survey of volcanic deformation in the central Andes. Geochem, Geophys, Geosyst 2004;5:2. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GC000610.Search in Google Scholar

7. Feng, J, Yuan, Y, Zhang, T, Zhang, Z, Meng, D. Analysis of ionospheric anomalies before the Tonga volcanic eruption on 15 January 2022. Remote Sens 2023;15:4879. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15194879.Search in Google Scholar

8. Poland, MP, Lopez, T, Wright, R, Pavolonis, MJ. Forecasting, detecting, and tracking volcanic eruptions from space. Remote Sens Earth Syst Sci 2020;3:55–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41976-020-00034-x.Search in Google Scholar

9. Harris, A. Thermal remote sensing of active volcanoes: a user’s manual. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2013.10.1017/CBO9781139029346Search in Google Scholar

10. Ramsey, MS, Harris, AJL. Volcanology 2020: how will thermal remote sensing of volcanic surface activity evolve over the next decade? (Invited review article). J Volcanol Geoth Res 2013;249:217–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2012.05.011.Search in Google Scholar

11. Akhoondzadeh, M. Earthquake prediction using satellite data: advances and ahead challenges. Adv Space Res 2024;74:3539–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.06.054.Search in Google Scholar

12. Zhang, H, Zhu, K, Cheng, Y, Marchetti, D, Chen, W, Fan, M, et al.. Atmospheric and ionospheric effects of La Palma volcano 2021 eruption. Atmosphere 2023;14:1198. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14081198.Search in Google Scholar

13. Foroodi, Z, Alizadeh, M, Amerian, Y, Schuh, H. Early detection of Tonga volcanic-eruption from internal gravity wave effects on ionosphere, using satellite geodetic techniques. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 2024;262:106310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2024.106310.Search in Google Scholar

14. Akhoondzadeh, M, De Santis, A, Marchetti, D, Piscini, A, Cianchini, G. Multi precursors analysis associated with the powerful Ecuador (MW=7.8) earthquake of 16 April 2016 using Swarm satellites data in conjunction with other multi-platform satellite and ground data. Adv Space Res 2018;61:248–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.07.014.Search in Google Scholar

15. De Santis, A, Balasis, G, Pavon-Carrasco, FJ, Cianchini, G, Mandea, M. Potential earthquake precursory pattern from space: the 2015 Nepal event as seen by magnetic Swarm satellites. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2017;461:119–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.12.037.Search in Google Scholar

16. Haagmans, R, Bock, R, Rider, H. Swarm. ESA’s magnetic field mission; 2013. Available from: https://earth.esa.int/documents/700255/1805948/ESA+magnetic+field+mission/36942f02-b2d4-4787-af81-eb19efb74265.Search in Google Scholar

17. Chen, YI, Huang, CS, Liu, JY. Statistical evidences of seismo-ionospheric precursors applying receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve on the GPS total electron content in China. J Asian Earth Sci 2015;114:393–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.05.028.Search in Google Scholar

18. Mayaud, PN. Derivation, meaning and use of geomagnetic indices. Washington, D. C: American Geo. Union; 1980, vol 22.10.1029/GM022Search in Google Scholar

19. Liu, JY, Chuo, YJ, Shan, SJ, Tsai, YB, Chen, YI, Pulinets, SA, et al.. Pre-earthquake-ionospheric anomalies registered by continuous GPS TEC. Ann Geophys 2004;22:1585–93. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-22-1585-2004.Search in Google Scholar

20. Rishbeth, H, Mendillo, M. Patterns of F2-layer variability. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 2001;63:1661–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6826(01)00036-0.Search in Google Scholar

21. Pulinets, SA, Legen, AD, Gaivoronskaya, TV, Depuev, VK. Main phenomenological features of ionospheric precursors of strong earthquakes. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 2003;65:1337–47.10.1016/j.jastp.2003.07.011Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-05-30
Accepted: 2024-09-21
Published Online: 2024-10-16
Published in Print: 2025-04-28

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Original Research Articles
  3. Locally robust Msplit estimation
  4. Extending geodetic networks for geo-monitoring by supervised point cloud matching
  5. Evaluation and homogenization of a marine gravity database from shipborne and satellite altimetry-derived gravity data over the coastal region of Nigeria
  6. Modelling geoid height errors for local areas based on data of global models
  7. Unmanned aerial vehicle-based aerial survey of mines in Shanxi Province based on image data
  8. Ionospheric TEC and its irregularities over Egypt: a comprehensive study of spatial and temporal variations using GOCE satellite data
  9. Monitoring of volcanic precursors using satellite data: the case of Taftan volcano in Iran
  10. Modeling of temperature deformations on the Dnister HPP dam (Ukraine)
  11. Impact of temporal resolution in global ionospheric models on satellite positioning during low and high solar activity years of solar cycle 24
  12. Comparative performance of PPP software packages in atmospheric delay estimation using GNSS data
  13. Assessment and fitting of high/ultra resolution global geopotential models using GNSS/levelling over Egypt
  14. An efficient ‘P1’ algorithm for dual mixed-integer least-squares problems with scalar real-valued parameters
  15. Spatio-temporal trajectory alignment for trajectory evaluation
  16. Monitoring of networked RTK reference stations for coordinate reference system realization and maintenance – case study of the Czech Republic
  17. Crustal deformation in East of Cairo, Egypt, induced by rapid urbanization, as seen from remote sensing and GNSS data
Downloaded on 8.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jag-2024-0049/html
Scroll to top button