Home Ionospheric TEC and its irregularities over Egypt: a comprehensive study of spatial and temporal variations using GOCE satellite data
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Ionospheric TEC and its irregularities over Egypt: a comprehensive study of spatial and temporal variations using GOCE satellite data

  • Ibrahim Fouad Bakry EMAIL logo , Ibrahim F. Ahmed , Ashraf E.-K Mousa and Gamal S. El-Fiky
Published/Copyright: October 15, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This study delves into ionospheric characteristics during solar cycle 24 using data from the Global Positioning System (GPS) and Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites, GOCE. The present study fills the gap of not assessing and studying GOCE satellite data before in Egypt. Focusing on spatial and temporal variations of ionospheric Total Electron Content (TEC) over Egypt and the Middle East across a 4-year dataset, monthly average Vertical Total Electron Content (VTEC) variations are scrutinized, emphasizing extremes during heightened and reduced solar and geomagnetic activities. Results TEC typically decreases with latitude’s increase, with peak ionization during equinoxes and troughs during solstices. Notably, VTEC values consistently reach maximum values on days of heightened solar and geomagnetic activities. GOCE data is evaluated against International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) model and NeQuick2 model by selecting 10 days from all data by using a statistical comparison via t-tests. There is not significant difference between them except for two days between GOCE-IRI. The values of Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) are 3.7403 and 4.4655 for GOCE – NeQuick2 model and GOCE – IRI model, respectively. Ionospheric scintillation, signifying rapid electron density fluctuations, is assessed through amplitude scintillation index (S4), S4 proxy, and Rate Of TEC Index (ROTI). A robust correlation between S4 and S4 proxy is noted, thus scintillation can be studied by using S4 proxy instead of S4. Temporal variations indicate heightened scintillation during geomagnetic storms and peak solar activity, contrasting with reduced activity during solar minimum. Throughout the study period the maximum scintillation index values for ROTI, S4, and S4 proxy are 0.3, 0.15, and 0.05, indicating minimal scintillation. This comprehensive analysis, rooted in GOCE data, illuminates spatial and temporal dynamics of ionospheric TEC and elucidates ionospheric scintillation characteristics in the Egypt region. These findings are crucial for refining ionospheric models, improving scintillation prediction, and enhancing satellite communication and navigation systems, especially in the study region.


Corresponding author: Ibrahim Fouad Bakry, Construction Engineering and Utilities Department, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the ESA, ETSI, NASA-CCMC and SWPC for providing data.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  4. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  5. Research funding: None declared.

  6. Data availability: Data are freely available and can be downloaded from: https://goce-ds.eo.esa.int/oads/access/collection/GOCE_TEC_and_ROTI/tree for the data, https://kauai.ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov/instantrun/iri/ for IRI data, https://t-ict4d.ictp.it/nequick2/nequick-2-web-model for NeQuick2 model.

References

1. Klobuchar, JA. Ionospheric effect on GPS. GPS World 1991;2:48–51.Search in Google Scholar

2. Hong, L. Interpolation and mapping of the total electron content over the Malaysian region [Master of science Thesis University of Technology]. Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Institutional Repository; 2008.Search in Google Scholar

3. Ovodenko, VB, Trekin, VV, Korenkova, NA, Klimenko, MV. Investigating range error compensation in UHF radar through IRI-2007 real-time updating: preliminary results. Adv Space Res 2015;56:900–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.05.017.Search in Google Scholar

4. Afraimovich, E, Yasukevich, YV, Physics, ST. Using GPS–GLONASS–GALILEO data and IRI modeling for ionospheric calibration of radio telescopes and radio interferometers. J Atmos 2008;70:1949–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2008.05.006.Search in Google Scholar

5. Hernández-Pajares, M, Juan, JM, Sanz, J, Orus, R, Garcia-Rigo, A, Feltens, J, et al.. The IGS VTEC maps: a reliable source of ionospheric information since 1998. J Geodesy 2009;83:263–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0266-1.Search in Google Scholar

6. Bilitza, D, Rawer, K, Bossy, L, Kutiev, I, Oyama, K-I, Leitinger, R, et al.. The international reference ionosphere 1990 (IRI-90). (NASA Technical Memorandum No. 105055). NASA. 1990. Available from: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19910021307.Search in Google Scholar

7. Bent, RB, Llewellyn, SK, Nesterczuk, G, Schmid, PE. Effect of the ionosphere on space systems and communications. In: Goodman JL, editor. The development of a highly-successful worldwide empirical ionospheric model and its use in certain aspects of space communications and worldwide total electron content investigations; 1975:13–28 pp.Search in Google Scholar

8. Hochegger, G, Nava, B, Radicella, S, Leitinger, R. A family of ionospheric models for different uses. Physics 2000;25:307–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-1917(00)00022-2.Search in Google Scholar

9. Dubey, S, Wahi, R, Gwal, A. Ionospheric effects on GPS positioning. Adv Space Res 2006;38:2478–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.07.030.Search in Google Scholar

10. Aarons, J, Whitney, HE, Allen, RS. Global morphology of ionospheric scintillations. Proc IEEE 1971;59:159–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1971.8122.Search in Google Scholar

11. Kelley, MC. The Earth’s ionosphere: plasma physics and electrodynamics. Academic Press; 2009.Search in Google Scholar

12. Burke, WJ, Gentile, LC, Huang, CY, Valladares, CE, Su, SY. Longitudinal variability of equatorial plasma bubbles observed by DMSP and ROCSAT-1. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 2004;109. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JA010583.Search in Google Scholar

13. Basu, S, Groves, KM, Basu, S, Sultan, PJ. Specification and forecasting of scintillations in communication/navigation links: current status and future plans. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 2002;64:1745–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(02)00124-4.Search in Google Scholar

14. Groves, KM, Basu, S, Weber, EJ, Smitham, M, Kuenzler, H, Valladares, CE, et al.. Equatorial scintillation and systems support. Radio Sci 1997;32:2047–64. https://doi.org/10.1029/97RS00836.Search in Google Scholar

15. Pi, X, Mannucci, AJ, Lindqwister, UJ, Ho, CM. Monitoring of global ionospheric irregularities using the Worldwide GPS Network. Geophys Res Lett 1997;24:2283–6. https://doi.org/10.1029/97GL02273.Search in Google Scholar

16. Ma, G, Maruyama, T. A super bubble detected by dense GPS network at east Asian longitudes. Geophys Res Lett 2006;33. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027512.Search in Google Scholar

17. Seif, A, Abdullah, M, Hasbi, AM, Zou, Y. Investigation of ionospheric scintillation at UKM station, Malaysia during low solar activity. Acta Astronaut 2012;81:92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.06.024.Search in Google Scholar

18. Olwendo, J, Cilliers, P. A comparison of ionospheric scintillation proxy indices derived from low rate IGS data with the amplitude scintillation index, S4, in a low latitude region over Africa. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 2018;173:160–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.04.012.Search in Google Scholar

19. European Space Agency. GOCE TEC and ROTI data collection. https://goce-ds.eo.esa.int/oads/access/collection/GOCE_TEC_and_ROTI/tree [Accessed 1 Mar 2022].Search in Google Scholar

20. Zakharenkova, I, Cherniak, I. How can GOCE and TerraSAR-X contribute to the topside ionosphere and plasmasphere research? Space Weather 2015;13:271–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015SW001162.Search in Google Scholar

21. Computation of TEC and rate of TEC index (ROTI) from GOCE GPS. http://gnss-x.ac.cn/docs/GO_TN_HPF_GS_0337_L2_TEC_and_ROTI.pdf [Accessed 1 Mar 2022].Search in Google Scholar

22. Liu, A, Wang, N, Li, Z, Wang, Z, Yuan, H. Assessment of NeQuick and IRI-2016 models during different geomagnetic activities in global scale: comparison with GPS-TEC, dSTEC, Jason-TEC and GIM. Adv Space Res 2019;63:3978–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.02.032.Search in Google Scholar

23. NASA Community Coordinated Modeling Center. IRI: international reference ionosphere. https://kauai.ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov/instantrun/iri/ [Accessed 7 Jul 2022].Search in Google Scholar

24. Nava, B, Coisson, P, Radicella, S. A new version of the NeQuick ionosphere electron density model. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 2008;70:1856–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2008.01.015.Search in Google Scholar

25. The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics. NeQuick 2 web model. https://t-ict4d.ictp.it/nequick2/nequick-2-web-model [Accessed 7 Jul 2022].Search in Google Scholar

26. Gwal, A, Dubey, S, Wahi, R, Feliziani, A. Amplitude and phase scintillation study at Chiang Rai, Thailand. Adv Space Res 2006;38:2361–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2006.02.057.Search in Google Scholar

27. Wu, DL. Ionospheric S4 scintillations from GNSS radio occultation (RO) at slant path. Rem Sens 2020;12:2373. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12152373.Search in Google Scholar

28. Zou, Y, Wang, D. A study of GPS ionospheric scintillations observed at Guilin. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 2009;71:1948–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.08.005.Search in Google Scholar

29. GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences. Kp daily plots. https://kp.gfz-potsdam.de/en/figures/kp-daily-plots [Accessed 7 Jul 2022].Search in Google Scholar

30. Utomo, Y. Correlation analysis of solar constant, solar activity and cosmic ray. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing; 2017.10.1088/1742-6596/817/1/012045Search in Google Scholar

31. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. Penticton observed noontime flux data. https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/space-weather/solar-data/solar-features/solar-radio/noontime-flux/penticton/penticton_observed/listings/listing_drao_noontime-flux-observed_daily.txt [Accessed 7 Jul 2022].Search in Google Scholar

32. Panda, S, Gedam, S, Rajaram, G. Study of Ionospheric TEC from GPS observations and comparisons with IRI and SPIM model predictions in the low latitude anomaly Indian subcontinental region. Adv Space Res 2015;55:1948–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.09.004.Search in Google Scholar

33. Sunda, S, Vyas, B. Local time, seasonal, and solar cycle dependency of longitudinal variations of TEC along the crest of EIA over India. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 2013;118:6777–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JA018918.Search in Google Scholar

34. Rishbeth, H, Mendillo, M. Patterns of F2-layer variability. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 2001;63:1661–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(01)00036-0.Search in Google Scholar

35. Jee, G, Schunk, RW, Scherliess, L. Comparison of IRI-2001 with TOPEX TEC measurements. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 2005;67:365–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2004.08.005.Search in Google Scholar

36. Chakraborty, M, Kumar, S, De, BK, Guha, A. Effects of geomagnetic storm on low latitude ionospheric total electron content: a case study from Indian sector. J Earth Syst Sci 2015;124:1115–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-015-0588-3.Search in Google Scholar

37. Shimeis, A, Amory-Mazaudier, C, Fleury, R, Mahrous, AM, Hassan, AF. Transient variations of vertical total electron content over some African stations from 2002 to 2012. Adv Space Res 2014;54:2159–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.07.038.Search in Google Scholar

38. Rishbeth, H. Thermospheric winds and the F-region: a review. J Atmos Terr Phys 1972;34:1–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(72)90003-7.Search in Google Scholar

39. Rishbeth, H. Some problems of the F region. Radio Sci 1974;9:183–7. https://doi.org/10.1029/RS009i002p00183.Search in Google Scholar

40. Arendt, PR, Soicher, H. Downward electron flux at 1,000 km altitude from electron content measurement at mid-latitudes. Nature 1964;204:983–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/204983a0.Search in Google Scholar

41. Tanna, H, Karia, S, Pathak, K. A study of L band scintillations during the initial phase of rising solar activity at an Indian low latitude station. Adv Space Res 2013;52:412–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.03.022.Search in Google Scholar

42. Kintner, PM, Ledvina, BM, Paula, ED. GPS and ionospheric scintillations. Space Weather 2007;5. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006SW000260.Search in Google Scholar

43. Basu, S, MacKenzie, E, Basu, S. Ionospheric constraints on VHF/UHF communications links during solar maximum and minimum periods. Radio Sci 1988;23:363–78. https://doi.org/10.1029/RS023i003p00363.Search in Google Scholar

44. Yang, Z, Liu, Z Correlation between ROTI and ionospheric scintillation indices using Hong Kong low-latitude GPS data. GPS Solut 2016;20:815-24. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2019-147, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

45. Liu, Y, Radicella, S On the correlation between ROTI and S4. Ann Geophys Discuss 2019;2019:1-14. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2019-147, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

46. Pathak, KN, Jivrajani, RD, Joshi, HP, Iyer, KN. Characteristics of VHF scintillations in the equatorial anomaly crest region in India. Ann Geophys 1995;13:730–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-995-0730-7.Search in Google Scholar

47. Liu, Y, Fu, L, Wang, J, Zhang, C. Studying ionosphere responses to a geomagnetic storm in June 2015 with multi-constellation observations. Rem Sens 2018;10:666. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10050666.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-05-31
Accepted: 2024-09-11
Published Online: 2024-10-15
Published in Print: 2025-04-28

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Original Research Articles
  3. Locally robust Msplit estimation
  4. Extending geodetic networks for geo-monitoring by supervised point cloud matching
  5. Evaluation and homogenization of a marine gravity database from shipborne and satellite altimetry-derived gravity data over the coastal region of Nigeria
  6. Modelling geoid height errors for local areas based on data of global models
  7. Unmanned aerial vehicle-based aerial survey of mines in Shanxi Province based on image data
  8. Ionospheric TEC and its irregularities over Egypt: a comprehensive study of spatial and temporal variations using GOCE satellite data
  9. Monitoring of volcanic precursors using satellite data: the case of Taftan volcano in Iran
  10. Modeling of temperature deformations on the Dnister HPP dam (Ukraine)
  11. Impact of temporal resolution in global ionospheric models on satellite positioning during low and high solar activity years of solar cycle 24
  12. Comparative performance of PPP software packages in atmospheric delay estimation using GNSS data
  13. Assessment and fitting of high/ultra resolution global geopotential models using GNSS/levelling over Egypt
  14. An efficient ‘P1’ algorithm for dual mixed-integer least-squares problems with scalar real-valued parameters
  15. Spatio-temporal trajectory alignment for trajectory evaluation
  16. Monitoring of networked RTK reference stations for coordinate reference system realization and maintenance – case study of the Czech Republic
  17. Crustal deformation in East of Cairo, Egypt, induced by rapid urbanization, as seen from remote sensing and GNSS data
Downloaded on 8.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jag-2024-0050/html
Scroll to top button