Abstract
This classroom-based observational study explored the relationship among young adolescent L2 learners’ self-regulated learning (SRL), SRL behaviours, and L2 use during group work. Although recent research has examined SRL concerning specific L2 skills (e.g., listening) via questionnaires, learners’ actual behaviours during interaction have rarely been investigated. Participants were Grades 7 and 8 (12–14 years old) EFL learners in Chile. First, participants answered an SRL questionnaire. Then, they engaged in a group project (20 groups in total) whose objective was to create a newsletter for the school. Their interactions during the group project were video-recorded (over 300 min in total). A coding scheme for SRL behaviours was developed by focusing on both verbal and nonverbal cues related to SRL. Their L2 use was analysed by focusing on the number of words, turns, and language-related episodes (LREs). The correlational analyses showed that the more SRL behaviours, the more L2 use, implying that when learners engage in SRL behaviours, it is more likely that they would benefit from group work for their L2 learning. Implications for pedagogical interventions for SRL are discussed.
Appendix A: Children’s Perceived use of Self-Regulated Learning Inventory (CP-SRLI)
Name: _________________________________ RUT: ________________________
English studying questionnaire.
Below are statements about what you may or may not do when you work on a task in English, how you feel about it, and what you do when you study English in general. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statements? Circle the number that fits your answer according to the following scale:
Strongly disagree | Strongly agree | |||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Statement | Likert scale | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Before I start my schoolwork, I read the instructions carefully. |
![]() 1 |
![]() 2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
2. Before I start my schoolwork, I ask myself: ‘What is it about? What do I already know about it?’ |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
3. Before I start my schoolwork, I ask myself: ‘Do I know what type of a task this is?’ |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
4. If I get a task similar to one I have already done, I ask myself: “How did I approach it last time? Was that a good approach?” |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
5. Before I start my schoolwork, I ask myself: ‘What do I feel about this task (fun, difficult, interesting, …)?’ |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
6. Before I start my schoolwork, I ask myself: ‘Will I succeed?’ |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
7. Before I start my schoolwork, I decide what to do first and what later. |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
8. If I find my schoolwork difficult, I allow more time for it. |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
9. If I have to do a large assignment, I start some days before and every day I do a piece of it. |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
10. Before I start my schoolwork, I think how much time I will need. |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
11. When studying, I read or recall everything again and again until I know it by heart. |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
12. When studying, I copy everything until I know it by heart. |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
13. When studying, I cover up part of the material and try to say it out loud. |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
14. When studying, I practise until I know everything. |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
15. When studying, I try to repeat the new material in my own words. |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
16. When studying, I make a summary. |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
17. When studying, I use tricks or mnemonics to remember something easier. |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
18. When studying, I link it to what I already know. |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
19. When studying, I look for examples connected to what I am learning. |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
20. When studying, I make up test questions and answer them after studying. |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
21. When studying, I make a scheme or a mind map. |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
22. When studying, I mark important information or write it down. |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
23. When studying, I look for the main subjects or topics. |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
24. When studying, I figure out the meaning of difficult words. |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
25. After finishing my schoolwork, I go over my answers again. |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
26. After finishing my schoolwork, I check that I haven’t forgotten anything. |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
27. After finishing my schoolwork, I check if I have done everything that was asked for. |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
28. After finishing my schoolwork, I ask myself: ‘Have I done it the right way?’ |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
29. After finishing my schoolwork, I ask myself: ‘Will I use a similar approach next time, or should I choose a different approach?’ |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
30. After finishing my schoolwork, I ask myself: ‘Did that way of doing it worked well?’ |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
31. After finishing my schoolwork, I ask myself: ‘How did I feel about it? (fun, difficult, boring, interesting, …)?’ |
![]() 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
![]() 5 |
Appendix B: Worksheet for the group project
Criterion | Yes | No |
---|---|---|
The content is clear, concise, and relevant to the audience. | ||
The main message is easily understood. | ||
Verify that headlines are attention-grabbing and accurately reflect the content. | ||
Subheadings should provide a quick overview of each section. | ||
Check for consistent use of colours, fonts, and logos. | ||
Confirm that images are high-quality and relevant. | ||
Check for any spelling or grammatical errors. |
References
Baas, Diana, Jos Castelijns, Marjan Vermeulen, Rob Martens & Mien Segers. 2015. The relation between assessment for learning and elementary students’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy use. British Journal of Educational Psychology 85(1). 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12058.Suche in Google Scholar
Bai, Barry & Wenjuan Guo. 2018. Influences of self-regulated learning strategy use on self-efficacy in primary school students’ English writing in Hong Kong. Reading & Writing Quarterly 34(6). 523–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2018.1499058.Suche in Google Scholar
Bai, Barry & Jing Wang. 2020. The role of growth mindset, self-efficacy and intrinsic value in self-regulated learning and English language learning achievements. Language Teaching Research 27(1). 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820933190.Suche in Google Scholar
Boekaerts, Monique. 1997. Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction 7(2). 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4752(96)00015-1.Suche in Google Scholar
Bui, Gavin & Amy Kong. 2019. Metacognitive instruction for peer review interaction in L2 writing. Journal of Writing Research 11(2). 357–392. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.11.02.05.Suche in Google Scholar
Cadavid-Ruiz, Natalia & Pablo del Río. 2018. An observational analysis of executive performance in school children. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art 11(3). 195–208. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2018.0314.Suche in Google Scholar
Cleary, Timothy J., Jacqueline Slemp & Erica R. Pawlo. 2020. Linking student self‐regulated learning profiles to achievement and engagement in mathematics. Psychology in the Schools 58(3). 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22456.Suche in Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2020. Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. Available at www.coe.int/lang-cefr.Suche in Google Scholar
Csizér, Kata & Gyula Tankó. 2015. English majors’ self-regulatory control strategy use in academic writing and its relation to L2 motivation. Applied Linguistics 38. 386–404.10.1093/applin/amv033Suche in Google Scholar
DeKeyser, Robert. 2017. Knowledge and skill in ISLA. In Shawn Loewen & Masatoshi Sato (eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition, 15–32. Routledge.10.4324/9781315676968-2Suche in Google Scholar
De la Fuente, Jesús, Lucía Zapata, José Manuel Martínez-Vicente, Paul Sander & David Putwain. 2014. Personal self-regulation, self-regulated learning and coping strategies, in university context with stress. Metacognition: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends 76. 223–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11062-2_9.Suche in Google Scholar
DiFrancesca, Daniell, John L. Nietfeld & Li Cao. 2016. A comparison of high and low achieving students on self-regulated learning variables. Learning and Individual Differences 45. 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.010.Suche in Google Scholar
Dinsmore, Daniel L., Patricia Alexander & Sandra Loughlin. 2008. Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review 20(4). 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9083-6.Suche in Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Zoltan & Stephen Ryan. 2015. The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315779553Suche in Google Scholar
Ganda, Danielle Ribeiro & Evely Boruchovitch. 2018. Promoting self-regulated learning of Brazilian Preservice student teachers: Results of an intervention program. Frontiers in Education 3(5). 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00005.Suche in Google Scholar
Gass, Susan M. & Evangeline Marlos Varonis. 1994. Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16(3). 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100013097.Suche in Google Scholar
Heirweg, Sofie, Mona Smul, Geert Devos & Hilde Van Keer. 2019. Profiling upper primary school students’ self-regulated learning through self-report questionnaires and think-aloud protocol analysis. Learning and Individual Differences 70. 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.02.001.Suche in Google Scholar
Hu, Jingjing & Xuesong Gao. 2018. Self-regulated strategic writing for academic studies in an English-medium-instruction context. Language and Education 32(1). 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2017.1373804.Suche in Google Scholar
Jansen, Renée S., Anouschka van Leeuwen, Jeroen Janssen, Suzanne Jak & Liesbeth Kester. 2019. Self-regulated learning partially mediates the effect of self-regulated learning interventions on achievement in higher education: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review 100292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100292.Suche in Google Scholar
Messick, Samuel. 1995. Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist 50. 741–749.10.1037//0003-066X.50.9.741Suche in Google Scholar
Mohammadi, Roya Ranjbar, Mahnaz Saeidi & Saeideh Ahangari. 2020. Self-regulated learning instruction and the relationships among self-regulation, reading comprehension and reading problem solving: PLS-SEM approach. Cogent Education 7(1). 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1746105.Suche in Google Scholar
Oliver, Rhonda, Bich Nguyen & Masatoshi Sato. 2017. Child ISLA. In Shawn Loewen & Masatoshi Sato (eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition, 468–487. Oxfordshire: Taylor & Francis.10.4324/9781315676968-26Suche in Google Scholar
Pintrich, Paul R. 2000. The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. Handbook of Self-regulation 451–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3.Suche in Google Scholar
Pintrich, Paul R. 2004. A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review 16(4). 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x.Suche in Google Scholar
Pintrich, Paul R., David A. F. Smith, Teresa Garcia & Wilbert J. Mckeachie. 1993. Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (Mslq). Educational and Psychological Measurement 53(3). 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024.Suche in Google Scholar
Sato, Masatoshi. 2020. Metacognitive instruction for collaborative interaction: The process and product of self-regulated learning in the Chilean EFL context. In Craig Lambert & Rhonda Oliver (eds.), Using tasks in second language teaching: Practice in diverse contexts, 215–236. Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters.10.2307/jj.22730569.16Suche in Google Scholar
Sato, Masatoshi & Kata Csizér. 2021. Combining learner psychology and ISLA research: Intersections in the classroom. Language Teaching Research 25(6). 839–855.10.1177/13621688211044237Suche in Google Scholar
Sato, Masatoshi & Claudia Dussuel Lam. 2021. Metacognitive instruction with young learners: A case of willingness to communicate, L2 use, and metacognition of oral communication. Language Teaching Research 25(6). 899–921. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211004639.Suche in Google Scholar
Sato, Masatoshi & Shawn Loewen. 2022. The research-practice dialogue in second language learning and teaching: Past, present, and future. The Modern Language Journal 106(3). 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12791.Suche in Google Scholar
Sato, Masatoshi. 2022. Metacognition. In Shaofeng Li, Phil Hiver & Mostafa Papi (eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences, 95–109. New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9781003270546-8Suche in Google Scholar
Sato, Masatoshi. 2023. Skill learning theories and language teaching: Different strokes for different folks. In Yuichi Suzuki (ed.), Practice and automatization in second language research: Theory, methods, and pedagogical implications, 63–86. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781003414643-4Suche in Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, Muriel. 2012. Introducing second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511888830Suche in Google Scholar
Schraw, Gregory & Rayne S. Dennison. 1994. Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology 19(4). 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033.Suche in Google Scholar
Storch, Neomy. 2002. Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning 52(1). 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179.Suche in Google Scholar
Swain, Merrill & Sharon Lapkin. 1998. Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal 82(3). 320–337.10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.xSuche in Google Scholar
Swain, Merrill & Sharon Lapkin. 2001. Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In Martin Bygate, Peter Skehan & Merrill Swain (eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks, 99–118. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Teng, Lin Sophie & Lawrence Jun Zhang. 2016. A questionnaire-based validation of multidimensional models of self-regulated learning strategies. The Modern Language Journal 100(3). 674–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12339.Suche in Google Scholar
Teng, Lin Sophie & Lawrence J. Zhang. 2019. Empowering learners in the second/foreign language classroom: Can self-regulated learning strategies-based writing instruction make a difference? Journal of Second Language Writing 48. 100701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100701.Suche in Google Scholar
Tse, Shek K., Lin Lin & Rex H. W. Ng. 2022. Self-regulated learning strategies and reading comprehension among bilingual primary school students in Hong Kong. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 25(9). 3258–3273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2022.2049686.Suche in Google Scholar
Vandevelde, Sabrina, Hilde Van Keer & Yves Rosseel. 2013. Measuring the complexity of upper primary school children’s self-regulated learning: A multi-component approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology 38(4). 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.09.002.Suche in Google Scholar
Whitebread, David, Penny Coltman, Deborah P. Pasternak, Claire Sangster, Valeska Grau, Sue Bingham, Qais Almeqdad & Demetra Demetriou. 2009. The development of two observational tools for assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children. Metacognition and Learning 4(1). 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9033-1.Suche in Google Scholar
Zeng, Yajun & Christine C. M. Goh. 2018. A self-regulated learning approach to extensive listening and its impact on listening achievement and metacognitive awareness. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 8(2). 193–218. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.2.Suche in Google Scholar
Zhang, Donglan & Lawrence J. Zhang. 2019. Metacognition and self-regulated learning (SRL) in second/Foreign language teaching. Second Handbook of English Language Teaching. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_47.Suche in Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Barry J.. 1986. Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology 11(4). 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476x(86)90027-5.Suche in Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Barry J. 2000. Attaining self-regulation. Handbook of self-regulation, 13–39. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7Suche in Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Barry J. 2002. Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice 41(2). 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2.Suche in Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Barry J. 2008. Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal 45(1). 166–183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909.Suche in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2024-0226).
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Young L2 learners in diverse instructional contexts
- Research Articles
- Impact of post-task explicit instruction on the interaction among child EFL learners in online task-based reading lessons
- Can we train young EFL learners to ‘notice the gap’? Exploring the relationship between metalinguistic awareness, grammar learning and the use of metalinguistic explanations in a dictogloss task
- Exploring self-regulated learning behaviours of young second language learners during group work
- Developmental trajectories of discourse features by age and learning environment
- Implementing an oral task in an EFL classroom with low proficient learners: a micro-evaluation
- Exploring teacher-student interaction in task and non-task sequences
- Children learning Mongolian as an additional language through the implementation of a task-based approach
- “Black children are gifted at learning languages – that’s why I could do TBLT”: inclusive Blackness as a pathway for TBLT innovation
- Regular Articles
- Defining competencies for training non-native Korean speaking teachers: a Q methodology approach
- A cross-modal analysis of lexical sophistication: EFL and ESL learners in written and spoken production
- Using sentence processing speed and automaticity to predict L2 performance in the productive and receptive tasks
- Distance-invoked difficulty as a trigger for errors in Chinese and Japanese EFL learners’ English writings
- Exploring Chinese university English writing teachers’ emotions in providing feedback on student writing
- General auditory processing, Mandarin L1 prosodic and phonological awareness, and English L2 word learning
- Why is L2 pragmatics still a neglected area in EFL teaching? Uncovered stories from Vietnamese EFL teachers
- Validation of metacognitive knowledge in vocabulary learning and its predictive effects on incidental vocabulary learning from reading
- Anxiety and enjoyment in oral presentations: a mixed-method study into Chinese EFL learners’ oral presentation performance
- The influence of language contact and ethnic identification on Chinese as a second language learners’ oral proficiency
- An idiodynamic study of the interconnectedness between cognitive and affective components underlying L2 willingness to communicate
- “I usually just rely on my intuition and go from there.” pedagogical rules and metalinguistic awareness of pre-service EFL teachers
- Development and validation of Questionnaire for Self-regulated Learning Writing Strategies (QSRLWS) for EFL learners
- Language transfer in tense acquisition: new evidence from English learning Chinese adolescents
- A systematic review of English-as-a-foreign-language vocabulary learning activities for primary school students
- Using automated indices of cohesion to explore the growth of cohesive features in L2 writing
- The impact of text-audio synchronized enhancement on collocation learning from reading-while-listening: an extended replication of Jung and Lee (2023)
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Young L2 learners in diverse instructional contexts
- Research Articles
- Impact of post-task explicit instruction on the interaction among child EFL learners in online task-based reading lessons
- Can we train young EFL learners to ‘notice the gap’? Exploring the relationship between metalinguistic awareness, grammar learning and the use of metalinguistic explanations in a dictogloss task
- Exploring self-regulated learning behaviours of young second language learners during group work
- Developmental trajectories of discourse features by age and learning environment
- Implementing an oral task in an EFL classroom with low proficient learners: a micro-evaluation
- Exploring teacher-student interaction in task and non-task sequences
- Children learning Mongolian as an additional language through the implementation of a task-based approach
- “Black children are gifted at learning languages – that’s why I could do TBLT”: inclusive Blackness as a pathway for TBLT innovation
- Regular Articles
- Defining competencies for training non-native Korean speaking teachers: a Q methodology approach
- A cross-modal analysis of lexical sophistication: EFL and ESL learners in written and spoken production
- Using sentence processing speed and automaticity to predict L2 performance in the productive and receptive tasks
- Distance-invoked difficulty as a trigger for errors in Chinese and Japanese EFL learners’ English writings
- Exploring Chinese university English writing teachers’ emotions in providing feedback on student writing
- General auditory processing, Mandarin L1 prosodic and phonological awareness, and English L2 word learning
- Why is L2 pragmatics still a neglected area in EFL teaching? Uncovered stories from Vietnamese EFL teachers
- Validation of metacognitive knowledge in vocabulary learning and its predictive effects on incidental vocabulary learning from reading
- Anxiety and enjoyment in oral presentations: a mixed-method study into Chinese EFL learners’ oral presentation performance
- The influence of language contact and ethnic identification on Chinese as a second language learners’ oral proficiency
- An idiodynamic study of the interconnectedness between cognitive and affective components underlying L2 willingness to communicate
- “I usually just rely on my intuition and go from there.” pedagogical rules and metalinguistic awareness of pre-service EFL teachers
- Development and validation of Questionnaire for Self-regulated Learning Writing Strategies (QSRLWS) for EFL learners
- Language transfer in tense acquisition: new evidence from English learning Chinese adolescents
- A systematic review of English-as-a-foreign-language vocabulary learning activities for primary school students
- Using automated indices of cohesion to explore the growth of cohesive features in L2 writing
- The impact of text-audio synchronized enhancement on collocation learning from reading-while-listening: an extended replication of Jung and Lee (2023)