Startseite Impact of post-task explicit instruction on the interaction among child EFL learners in online task-based reading lessons
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Impact of post-task explicit instruction on the interaction among child EFL learners in online task-based reading lessons

  • Yoojin Chung EMAIL logo und Andrea Révész
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 1. Januar 2025
International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching
Aus der Zeitschrift International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching Band 63 Heft 3

Abstract

L2 researchers increasingly agree that task-based teaching, combined with timely form-focused instruction, offers an ideal environment for L2 learning. However, the timing of form-focused instruction is debated, with concerns that pre-task interventions may distract learners from focusing on meaning. While some studies address this issue for adults, little is known about children. Hence, this study examined the impact of post-task explicit instruction on children’s task-based interactions in an online EFL setting. Thirty-three Korean EFL children aged 7–11 participated in seven online lessons using Zoom and Padlet. They read a storybook and completed a collaborative post-reading task. The +Explicit Instruction group (+EI) received a three-minute grammar explanation before the task, while the −Explicit Instruction group (−EI) did not. The children’s interaction was analysed for language-related episodes (LREs). Although the number of LREs was small, the −EI group generated significantly more and more elaborate LREs than the +EI group. Regardless of group, the participants attempted to address the majority of linguistic issues raised, but importantly, LREs related to the target form hardly ever occurred. Overall, the analyses of task-based interactions revealed that participants’ primary attention remained on meaning, regardless of whether or not they received explicit instruction.

Keywords: task-based language teaching; computer-assisted language learning; reading tasks; young learners; language-related episodes
Corresponding author: Yoojin Chung, Department of English Language and Applied Linguistics, University of Reading, Whiteknights House, RG6 6UR, Reading, UK, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Research ethics approval was received from the Research Ethics Committee at University College of London, Institute of Education. Prior to the study, the participants and their guardians were given an introduction and an information sheet describing (a) the purpose of the study (b) the duration and procedure of the study, (c) the participants’ freedom to withdraw from the study at any time, and (d) the measures taken to ensure privacy and confidentiality. Each participants’ and guardian’s agreement to participate in the study was obtained by signing an online consent form.

  2. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: None declared.

  5. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

Appendix A

A.1 Pre-reading activity

A.2 Post-reading activity

A.3 Post-reading activity

A.4 Class Padlet wall

Appendix B: Explicit instruction slide

References

Azkarai, Agurtzane & Marta Kopinska. 2020. Young EFL learners and collaborative writing: A study on patterns of interaction, engagement in LREs, and task motivation. System 94. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102338.Suche in Google Scholar

Baralt, Melissa. 2014. Task sequencing and task complexity in traditional versus online classes. In Melissa Baralt, Robert Gilabert & Peter Robinson (eds.), Task sequencing and instructed second language learning, 95–122. London, UK: Bloomsbury.Suche in Google Scholar

Calzada, Asier & María del Pilar García Mayo. 2021. Child learners’ reflections about EFL grammar in a collaborative writing task: When form is not at odds with communication. Language Awareness 30(1). 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2020.1751178.Suche in Google Scholar

Chapelle, Carol. 2003. English language learning and technology lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.7Suche in Google Scholar

Collins, Laura & Carmen Muñoz. 2016. The foreign language classroom: Current perspectives and future considerations. The Modern Language Journal 100(S1). 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12305.Suche in Google Scholar

Council of Europe. 2018. Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion volume with new descriptors. https://rm.coe.int/cefr-companion-volume-with-new-descriptors-2018/1680787989 (accessed 1 October 2024).Suche in Google Scholar

DeKeyser, Robert. 2015. Skill acquisition theory. In Bill VanPatten & Jessica Williams (eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction, 94–112. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Doughty, Catherine & Michael Long. 2003. Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language, Learning and Technology 7(3). 50–80.Suche in Google Scholar

Doughty, Catherine & Jessica Williams. 1998. Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In Catherine Doughty & Jessica Williams (eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, 197–261. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Edstrom, Anne. 2015. Triads in the L2 classroom: Interaction patterns and engagement during collaborative task. System 52. 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.014.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2003. Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick. 2006. Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics 27(2). 164–194. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml015.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2018. Reflections on task-based language teaching. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/ELLIS0131Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod, Shaofeng Li & Yan Zhu. 2019. The effects of pre-task explicit instruction on the performance of a focused task. System 80. 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.10.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod, Peter Skehan, Shaofeng Li, Natsuko Shintani & Craig Lambert. 2020. Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108643689Suche in Google Scholar

Enever, Janet. 2018. Politics and policy in global primary English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

García Mayo, María del Pilar. 2002. Interaction in advanced EFL pedagogy: A comparison of form-focused activities. International Journal of Educational Research 37. 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-0355(03)00008-9.Suche in Google Scholar

García Mayo, María del Pilar. 2018. Child task-based interaction in EFL settings: Research and challenges. International Journal of English Studies 18(2). 119–143. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2018/2/319731.Suche in Google Scholar

García Mayo, María del Pilar. 2022. Child task-based language learning in foreign language contexts. In Hassan Mohebbi & Christine Coombe (eds.), Research questions in language education and applied linguistics, 189–194. Cham: Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-030-79143-8_35Suche in Google Scholar

García Mayo, María del Pilar & Agurtzane Azkarai. 2016. EFL task-based interaction. Does task modality impact on language related episodes? In Masatoshi Sato & Susan Ballinger (eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Research agenda and pedagogical potential, 241–266. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.45.10garSuche in Google Scholar

García Mayo, María del Pilar & Amparo Ibarrola. 2015. Do children negotiate for meaning in task-based interaction? Evidence from CLIL and EFL settings. System 54. 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.12.001.Suche in Google Scholar

García Mayo, María del Pilar & María Luquin. 2023. Does repeated pre-task planning have an impact on form-focused LREs? Language Teaching for Young Learners 5(2). 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.00038.may.Suche in Google Scholar

Gass, Susan, Alison Mackey & Lauren Ross-Feldman. 2005. Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning 55(4). 575–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00318.x.Suche in Google Scholar

González-Lloret, Marta. 2024. The future of language learning teaching in a technology- mediated 21st century. The Modern Language Journal 108(2). 541–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12928.Suche in Google Scholar

González-Lloret, Marta & Lourdes Ortega. 2014. Toward technology-mediated TBLT: An introduction. In Marta González-Lloret & Lourdes Ortega (eds.), Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks, 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.6.01gonSuche in Google Scholar

González-Lloret, Marta & Nicole Ziegler. 2021. Technology-mediated TBLT. In Mohammad Ahmadian & Michael Long (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of task-based language teaching, 326–345. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108868327.019Suche in Google Scholar

Grabe, William & Fredricka L. Stoller. 2011. Teaching and researching reading. London, UK: Routledge.10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1174Suche in Google Scholar

Han, Zhaohong. 2013. Forty years later: Updating the fossilization hypothesis. Language Teaching 46(2). 133–171. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444812000511.Suche in Google Scholar

Han, ZhaoHong & Amy D’ Angelo. 2009. Balancing between comprehension and acquisition: Proposing a dual approach. In ZhaoHong Han & Neil J. Anderson (eds.), Second language reading research and instruction: Crossing the boundaries. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hidalgo, María Ángeles & María del Pilar García Mayo. 2021. The influence of task repetition type on young EFL learners’ attention to form. Language Teaching Research 25(4). 565–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819865559.Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, YouJin & Kim McDonough. 2008. The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research 12(2). 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807086288.Suche in Google Scholar

Kowal, Maria & Merrill Swain. 1994. Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students’ language awareness. Language Awareness 3(2). 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.1994.9959845.Suche in Google Scholar

Krashen, Stephen. 2004. The power of reading: Insights from the research. Eaglewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.Suche in Google Scholar

Kuiken, Folkert & Ineke Vedder. 2018. Assessing functional adequacy of L2 performance in a task-based approach. In Naoko Taguchi & YouJin Kim (eds.), Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics, 266–285. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.10.11kuiSuche in Google Scholar

Lee, Lina. 2007. Fostering second language oral communication through constructivist interaction in desktop videoconferencing. Foreign Language Annals 40(4). 635–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2007.tb02885.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Leeser, Michael. 2004. Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research 8(1). 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr134oa.Suche in Google Scholar

Littlewood, William. 2007. Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching 40(3). 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444807004363.Suche in Google Scholar

Long, Michael. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In William Ritchie & Tej Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, 413–468. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3Suche in Google Scholar

Long, Michael. 2015. Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.Suche in Google Scholar

Long, Michael & Peter Robinson. 1998. Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In Catherine Doughty & Jessica Williams (eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, 15–41. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Mackey, Alison & Jaemyung Goo. 2007. Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In Alison Mackey (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies, 407–453. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Martínez-Adrián, Maria & Francisco Gallardo-del-Puerto. 2021. Task modality and language-related episodes in young learners: An attempt to manage accuracy and editing. Language Teaching Research 28(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211052808.Suche in Google Scholar

Motteram, Gary & Michael Thomas. 2010. Future directions for technology-mediated tasks. In Michael Thomas & Hayo Reinders (eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching with technology, 218–237. London, UK: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Nassaji, Hossein & Jun Tian. 2010. Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs. Language Teaching Research 14(4). 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375364.Suche in Google Scholar

Ortega, Lourdes. 2009. Interaction and attention to form in L2 text-based computer-mediated communication. In Alison Mackey & Charlene Polio (eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction, 226–253. New York, NY: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Pellettieri, Jill. 2000. Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In Mark Warschauer & Richard Kern (eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice, 59–86. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524735.006Suche in Google Scholar

Philp, Jenefer, Susan Walter & Helen Basturkmen. 2010. Peer interaction in the foreign language classroom: What factors foster a focus on form? Language Awareness 19(4). 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2010.516831.Suche in Google Scholar

Pellicer-Sánchez, Ana. 2016. Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition from and while reading: An eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38(1). 97–130.10.1017/S0272263115000224Suche in Google Scholar

Philp, Jenefer, Rebecca Adams & Noriko Iwashita. 2013. Peer interaction and second language learning. New York: Taylor & Francis.10.4324/9780203551349Suche in Google Scholar

Pinter, Annamaria. 2011. Children learning second languages. Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230302297Suche in Google Scholar

Plonsky, Luke & Youjin Kim. 2016. Task-based learner production: A substantive and methodological review. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36. 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190516000015.Suche in Google Scholar

Rouhshad, Amir & Neomy Storch. 2016. Patterns of interaction in face-to-face and computer-mediated contexts. In Masatoshi Sato & Susan Ballinger (eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda, 267–290. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.45.11rouSuche in Google Scholar

Sato, Masatoshi & Claudia Dussuel Lam. 2021. Metacognitive instruction with young learners: A case of willingness to communicate, L2 use, and metacognition of oral communication. Language Teaching Research 25(6). 899–921. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211004639.Suche in Google Scholar

Skehan, Peter. 1996. A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics 17(1). 38–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.38.Suche in Google Scholar

Skehan, Peter. 1998. A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1177/003368829802900209Suche in Google Scholar

Smith, Bryan. 2003. Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal 87(1). 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00177.Suche in Google Scholar

Spada, Nina & Yasuyo Tomita. 2010. Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning 60(2). 263–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Storch, Neomy. 2008. Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness 17(2). 95–114. https://doi.org/10.2167/la431.0.Suche in Google Scholar

Storch, Neomy. 2013. Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847699954Suche in Google Scholar

Storch, Neomy & Ali Aldosari. 2013. Pairing learners in pair work activity. Language Teaching Research 17(1). 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812457530.Suche in Google Scholar

Storch, Neomy & Gillian Wigglesworth. 2010. Learners’ processing, uptake and retention of corrective feedback on writing: Case studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32(2). 303–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263109990532.Suche in Google Scholar

Swain, Merrill. 1995. Three functions of output in second language learning. In Guy Cook & Barbara Seidlhofer (eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson, 125–144. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Swain, Merrill. 2005. The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In Eli Hinkel (ed.), Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning, 471–483. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Swain, Merrill & Sharon Lapkin. 1998. Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal 82(3). 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Swain, Merrill & Sharon Lapkin. 2001. Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In Martin Bygate, Peter Skehan & Merrill Swain (eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing, 99–118. New York, NY: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Sydorenko, Tetyana, John Hellermann, Steven Thorne & Vanessa Howe. 2019. Mobile augmented reality and language-related episodes. Tesol Quarterly 53(3). 712–740. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.507.Suche in Google Scholar

Van de Guchte, Marrit, Gert Rijlaarsdam, Martine Braaksma & Peter Bimmel. 2019. Focus on language versus content in the pre-task: Effects of guided peer-video model observations on task performance. Language Teaching Research 23(3). 310–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817735543.Suche in Google Scholar

VanPatten, Bill. 1996. Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Suche in Google Scholar

Webb, Stuart & Anna C.-S. Chang. 2015. Second language vocabulary learning through extensive reading: How does frequency and distribution of occurrence affect learning? Language Teaching Research 19(6). 667–686.10.1177/1362168814559800Suche in Google Scholar

Williams, Jessica. 1999. Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning 49(4). 583–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00103.Suche in Google Scholar

Willis, Dave & Jane Willis. 2007. Doing task-based teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Yanguas, Iñigo. 2010. Oral computer-mediated interaction between L2 learners: It’s about time. Language, Learning and Technology 14(3). 72–93.Suche in Google Scholar

Yanguas, Iñigo & Tyler Bergin. 2018. Focus on form in task-based L2 oral computer-mediated communication. Language, Learning and Technology 22(3). 65–81.Suche in Google Scholar

Ziegler, Nicole. 2016. Taking technology to task: Technology-mediated TBLT, performance, and production. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36. 136–163. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190516000039.Suche in Google Scholar
Received: 2024-06-10
Accepted: 2024-12-08
Published Online: 2025-01-01
Published in Print: 2025-09-25

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Young L2 learners in diverse instructional contexts
  4. Research Articles
  5. Impact of post-task explicit instruction on the interaction among child EFL learners in online task-based reading lessons
  6. Can we train young EFL learners to ‘notice the gap’? Exploring the relationship between metalinguistic awareness, grammar learning and the use of metalinguistic explanations in a dictogloss task
  7. Exploring self-regulated learning behaviours of young second language learners during group work
  8. Developmental trajectories of discourse features by age and learning environment
  9. Implementing an oral task in an EFL classroom with low proficient learners: a micro-evaluation
  10. Exploring teacher-student interaction in task and non-task sequences
  11. Children learning Mongolian as an additional language through the implementation of a task-based approach
  12. “Black children are gifted at learning languages – that’s why I could do TBLT”: inclusive Blackness as a pathway for TBLT innovation
  13. Regular Articles
  14. Defining competencies for training non-native Korean speaking teachers: a Q methodology approach
  15. A cross-modal analysis of lexical sophistication: EFL and ESL learners in written and spoken production
  16. Using sentence processing speed and automaticity to predict L2 performance in the productive and receptive tasks
  17. Distance-invoked difficulty as a trigger for errors in Chinese and Japanese EFL learners’ English writings
  18. Exploring Chinese university English writing teachers’ emotions in providing feedback on student writing
  19. General auditory processing, Mandarin L1 prosodic and phonological awareness, and English L2 word learning
  20. Why is L2 pragmatics still a neglected area in EFL teaching? Uncovered stories from Vietnamese EFL teachers
  21. Validation of metacognitive knowledge in vocabulary learning and its predictive effects on incidental vocabulary learning from reading
  22. Anxiety and enjoyment in oral presentations: a mixed-method study into Chinese EFL learners’ oral presentation performance
  23. The influence of language contact and ethnic identification on Chinese as a second language learners’ oral proficiency
  24. An idiodynamic study of the interconnectedness between cognitive and affective components underlying L2 willingness to communicate
  25. “I usually just rely on my intuition and go from there.” pedagogical rules and metalinguistic awareness of pre-service EFL teachers
  26. Development and validation of Questionnaire for Self-regulated Learning Writing Strategies (QSRLWS) for EFL learners
  27. Language transfer in tense acquisition: new evidence from English learning Chinese adolescents
  28. A systematic review of English-as-a-foreign-language vocabulary learning activities for primary school students
  29. Using automated indices of cohesion to explore the growth of cohesive features in L2 writing
  30. The impact of text-audio synchronized enhancement on collocation learning from reading-while-listening: an extended replication of Jung and Lee (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2024-0168
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
task-based language teaching; computer-assisted language learning; reading tasks; young learners; language-related episodes

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Young L2 learners in diverse instructional contexts
  4. Research Articles
  5. Impact of post-task explicit instruction on the interaction among child EFL learners in online task-based reading lessons
  6. Can we train young EFL learners to ‘notice the gap’? Exploring the relationship between metalinguistic awareness, grammar learning and the use of metalinguistic explanations in a dictogloss task
  7. Exploring self-regulated learning behaviours of young second language learners during group work
  8. Developmental trajectories of discourse features by age and learning environment
  9. Implementing an oral task in an EFL classroom with low proficient learners: a micro-evaluation
  10. Exploring teacher-student interaction in task and non-task sequences
  11. Children learning Mongolian as an additional language through the implementation of a task-based approach
  12. “Black children are gifted at learning languages – that’s why I could do TBLT”: inclusive Blackness as a pathway for TBLT innovation
  13. Regular Articles
  14. Defining competencies for training non-native Korean speaking teachers: a Q methodology approach
  15. A cross-modal analysis of lexical sophistication: EFL and ESL learners in written and spoken production
  16. Using sentence processing speed and automaticity to predict L2 performance in the productive and receptive tasks
  17. Distance-invoked difficulty as a trigger for errors in Chinese and Japanese EFL learners’ English writings
  18. Exploring Chinese university English writing teachers’ emotions in providing feedback on student writing
  19. General auditory processing, Mandarin L1 prosodic and phonological awareness, and English L2 word learning
  20. Why is L2 pragmatics still a neglected area in EFL teaching? Uncovered stories from Vietnamese EFL teachers
  21. Validation of metacognitive knowledge in vocabulary learning and its predictive effects on incidental vocabulary learning from reading
  22. Anxiety and enjoyment in oral presentations: a mixed-method study into Chinese EFL learners’ oral presentation performance
  23. The influence of language contact and ethnic identification on Chinese as a second language learners’ oral proficiency
  24. An idiodynamic study of the interconnectedness between cognitive and affective components underlying L2 willingness to communicate
  25. “I usually just rely on my intuition and go from there.” pedagogical rules and metalinguistic awareness of pre-service EFL teachers
  26. Development and validation of Questionnaire for Self-regulated Learning Writing Strategies (QSRLWS) for EFL learners
  27. Language transfer in tense acquisition: new evidence from English learning Chinese adolescents
  28. A systematic review of English-as-a-foreign-language vocabulary learning activities for primary school students
  29. Using automated indices of cohesion to explore the growth of cohesive features in L2 writing
  30. The impact of text-audio synchronized enhancement on collocation learning from reading-while-listening: an extended replication of Jung and Lee (2023)
Jetzt anmelden und 20% sparen
Institutioneller Zugang
Wie funktioniert Authentifizierung?
Haben Sie eine Idee, wie wir unsere Website verbessern können?
Bitte schreiben Sie uns.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Heruntergeladen am 20.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2024-0168/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen