Home Comparison between conventional Vickers hardness and indentation hardness obtained with different instruments
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Comparison between conventional Vickers hardness and indentation hardness obtained with different instruments

  • T. Chudoba EMAIL logo and M. Griepentrog
Published/Copyright: February 4, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

An extensive comparison between the conventional Vickers hardness at 500 mN and indentation hardness measured with Vickers indenters at 500 mN is presented for up to 20 different materials and for three different instruments. Additionally, the indentation modulus is compared to Young’s modulus, which was measured with alternative methods or taken from the literature. It is shown that the agreement between the results from depth-sensing indentation and the reference values can be improved by additional corrections, for the calculation of the indentation area. With corrections the mean hardness difference to the Vickers hardness reference as average of all investigated materials can be reduced to about 10 % although disturbing pile-up or sink-in effects can still not be considered. For the modulus, the mean difference was only about 6 %.


Dr. T. Chudoba ASMEC GmbH Bautzner Landstr. 54, D-01454 Radeberg, Germany Tel.: +49 351 2695 345 Fax: +49 351 2695 346

References

[1] ISO 6507, Metallic Materials – Vickers Hardness Test, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (1997).Search in Google Scholar

[2] W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr: J. Mater. Res. 7 (1992) 1564.10.1557/JMR.1992.1564Search in Google Scholar

[3] ISO 14577, Metallic Materials –Instrumented Indentation Test for Hardness and Materials Parameters, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (2002).Search in Google Scholar

[4] J. Woirgard, J.-C. Dargenton: J. Mater. Res. 12 (1997) 2455.10.1557/JMR.1997.0324Search in Google Scholar

[5] W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr: J. Mater. Res. 19 (2004) 3.10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3Search in Google Scholar

[6] K.L. Johnson: Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985).10.1017/CBO9781139171731Search in Google Scholar

[7] European Project: Certified Reference Materials for Depth Sensing Indentation Instrumentation (DESIRED), contract no. G6RD-CT2000-00418, funded by the European Community under the ‘Competitive and Sustainable Growth’ Programme, finished March 2004.Search in Google Scholar

[8] H. Bückle: Metall. Rev. 4 (1959) 49.10.1179/095066059790421746Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2004-10-23
Accepted: 2005-03-05
Published Online: 2022-02-04

© 2005 Carl Hanser Verlag, München

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. nanomech 5
  4. Articles Basic
  5. Quantitative evaluation of nanoindents: Do we need more reliable mechanical parameters for the characterization of materials?
  6. Nanoindentation investigation of solid-solution strengthening in III-V semiconductor alloys
  7. Comparison between conventional Vickers hardness and indentation hardness obtained with different instruments
  8. On the pressure dependence of the indentation modulus
  9. A review on the reverse analysis for the extraction of mechanical properties using instrumented Vickers indentation
  10. Articles Applied
  11. Quasi-static and dynamic depth-sensing indentation measurements to characterize wear and mar resistance of coating–polymer systems
  12. Obtaining mechanical parameters for metallisation stress sensor design using nanoindentation
  13. Direct measurement of nanoindentation area function by metrological AFM
  14. A usable concept for the indentation of thin porous films
  15. Analysis of the ductile/brittle transition during a scratch test performed into polymeric film deposited on a PMMA substrate
  16. Nanomechanical and nanotribological properties of polymeric ultrathin films for nanoimprint lithography
  17. Adhesive and nanomechanical properties of polymeric films deposited on silicon
  18. Modelling of the nanoindentation process of ultrathin films
  19. Regular articles
  20. Experimental investigation and thermodynamic calculation in the Al–Be–Si ternary system
  21. Thermodynamic assessment of the Ca–Sn system
  22. Interfacial reaction between Cu and Ti2SnC during processing of Cu–Ti2SnC composite
  23. Effects of heat treatment on the lubricated sliding wear behaviour of zinc-based alloy containing nickel under varying test conditions
  24. Influence of Ce, K, and Na on spheroidization of eutectic carbides in low-tungsten white cast iron
  25. Notifications/Mitteilungen
  26. Personal/Personelles
  27. Press/Presse
Downloaded on 16.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijmr-2005-0216/pdf
Scroll to top button