Startseite Evaluation and Optimization of Steam and Lye Peeling Processes of Sweet Potato (Ipomea batatas) using Response Surface Methodology (RSM)
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Evaluation and Optimization of Steam and Lye Peeling Processes of Sweet Potato (Ipomea batatas) using Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

  • Ayobami O. Oladejo EMAIL logo , Olajide P. Sobukola , Samuel O. Awonorin und Samuel B. Adejuyigbe
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 20. Mai 2014
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Sweet potato of uniform sizes and shape were subjected to steam peeling (temperature 80–100°C and peeling time 5–15 min) and lye peeling (sodium hydroxide concentration 8–12%, temperature 80–100°C and peeling time 3–5 min). Response surface methodology was used to analyze and optimize the process parameters in each case. For steam peeling, the peel loss and unpeeled surface area were 6.85 and 28.16%, respectively, while optimum peeling conditions where temperature and peeling time of 100°C and 5 min, respectively, for minimum peel loss and unpeeled surface area. For lye peeling, however, the peel loss and unpeeled surface area were 13.19 and 13.35%, respectively, and optimum peeling conditions were lye concentration, temperature and peeling time of 8.89%, 100°C and 4.75 min, respectively, for minimum peel loss and unpeeled surface area. The models developed in each case (R-squared of 0.9225 and 0.8428; 0.5929 and 0.8346) were adequate in producing responses as a function of the independent variables. From the optimized values and results obtained, lye peeling was more suitable for sweet potato.

References

1. OatesC. Sweet potato – Asia in: select markets for taro, yams and sweet potatoes. Compiled by Grant Vining. RIPDC, 2003:3.Suche in Google Scholar

2. FAOSTAT. Statistics database (online). September. Available at: http://apps.fao.org, 2007.Suche in Google Scholar

3. International Potato Center (CIP). Sweet potato facts. Lima, Peru: International Potato Center, 1999:12.Suche in Google Scholar

4. WoolfeJA. Sweet potato: an untapped food resource.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Suche in Google Scholar

5. PichaDH. Crude protein, minerals and total carotenoids in sweet potatoes. J Food Sci1985;50:17689.10.1111/j.1365-2621.1985.tb10592.xSuche in Google Scholar

6. USDA. Potatoes and sweet potatoes: final estimate. Statistical Bulletin: United States Department of Agriculture 1978–1982, Washington, DC, 1984:709.Suche in Google Scholar

7. JiangX, JianjunH, WangY. Sweet potato processing and product research and development at the Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Cheng Du, P.R. China, 1995:1246.Suche in Google Scholar

8. GrantV. Select markets for taro, sweet potato and yam. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, 2003:3.Suche in Google Scholar

9. FellowsPJ. Food processing technology. Principles and practice. England: CRC Press, 2000:956.10.1201/NOE0849308871Suche in Google Scholar

10. SettyGR, VijayalakshmiMR, DeviAU. Methods for peeling fruits and vegetables: a critical evaluation. J Food Sci Technol1993;30:15562.Suche in Google Scholar

11. OladejoAO. An evaluation of some peeling methods for sweet potato (Ipomea batatas). MSc dissertation, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta 2011.Suche in Google Scholar

12. EmadiB, Abbaspour-FardMH, YarlagaddaPK. Mechanical peeling of pumpkins. Part 2: modeling of peeling process. J Food Eng2008;89:4539.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.05.028Suche in Google Scholar

13. OnayemiO, OjoA, AdetunjiVO. Peeling of yams for processing. J Food Process Preservation1985;9:1718.10.1111/j.1745-4549.1985.tb00717.xSuche in Google Scholar

14. WeaverM, HuxsollC, NgK. Sequential heat-cool peeling of tomatoes. Food Technol1980;34:40.Suche in Google Scholar

15. AbdullahiME, AlokoDF, MustaphaVJ. Optimization of some operating parameters for steam peeling of cassava tubers. Int J ChemTech Res CODEN USA2010;3:15927.Suche in Google Scholar

16. GarciaM, BarretDM. Peelability and yield of processingtomatoes by steam or lye. J Food Process Preservation2005;30:314.10.1111/j.1745-4549.2005.00042.xSuche in Google Scholar

17. GarroteRL, SilvaER, BertoneRA. Effect of thermal treatment on steam peeled potatoes. J Food Eng2000;45:6776.10.1016/S0260-8774(00)00032-7Suche in Google Scholar

18. OzlemA. Mathematical analysis of peeling of carrots. A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University, 2005.Suche in Google Scholar

19. GarroteRL, SilvaER, BertoneRA, AvalleA. Effect of time and number of cycles on yield and peeling quality of steam peeled potatoes and asparagus. LWTechnol – Food Sci Technol1997;30:44851.10.1006/fstl.1996.0191Suche in Google Scholar

20. RamaswamyH, MarcotteH. Food processing. Principles and applications. US: CRC Press, 2006:11819.Suche in Google Scholar

21. GrahamB, DenysR. Innovations in peeling technology for Yacon project report international potato center. Lima, Peru, 2004.Suche in Google Scholar

22. BarringerSA, BennettMA, BashWD. Effect of fruit maturity and nitrogen fertilizer levels on tomato peeling efficiency. J Vegetable Crop Prod1999;5:311.10.1300/J068v05n01_02Suche in Google Scholar

23. RoyD, DaoudiL, AzaolaA. Optimization of galactooligosaccharide production by bifidobacterium infants RW-8120 using response surface methodology. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol2002;29:2815.10.1038/sj.jim.7000319Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. BoxGE, DraperNR. Empirical model building and response surfaces. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1987.Suche in Google Scholar

25. KhuriAI, CornellJA. Response surfaces: designs and analyses, 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1996:190.Suche in Google Scholar

26. MyersRH, MontgomeryDC. Response surface methodology, process and product optimization using designed experiments, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1995.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Gamboa-SantosJ, SoriaAC, FornariT, VillamielM, MontillaA. Optimization of convective drying of carrots using selected processing and quality indicators. Int J Food Sci Technol2013;48:19982006.10.1111/ijfs.12076Suche in Google Scholar

28. HayJX, WuTY, TehCY, JahimJM. Optimized growth of Rhodobacter sphaeroides O.U.001 using response surface methodology (RSM). J Sci Ind Res2012;71:14954.Suche in Google Scholar

29. UsharaniK, MuthukumarM. Optimization of aqueous methyl parathion biodegradation by Fusarium sp in batch scale process using response surface methodology. Int J Environ Sci Technol2013;10:591606.10.1007/s13762-012-0144-5Suche in Google Scholar

30. TanHT, DykesGA, WuTY, SiowLF. Enhanced xylose recovery from oil palm empty fruit bunch by efficient acid hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol2013;170:160213.10.1007/s12010-013-0298-8Suche in Google Scholar

31. JadhavSB, SurwaseSN, PhugareSS, JadhavJP. Response surface methodology mediated optimization of remazol orange decolorization in plain distilled water by pseudomonas aeruginosa BCH. Int J Environ Sci Technol2013;10:18190.10.1007/s13762-012-0088-9Suche in Google Scholar

32. WalterWM, GiesbrechtFG. Effect of lye peeling conditions on phenolic destruction, starch hydrolysis, and carotene loss in sweet potatoes. J Food Sci1982;47:81012.10.1111/j.1365-2621.1982.tb12720.xSuche in Google Scholar

33. WillardMJ. A grading system of peeled potatoes. In:Proceedings of the 21st national potato utility conference, July 1971:28.Suche in Google Scholar

34. GarroteRL, CoutazVR, LunaJA, SilvaER, BertoneRA.Optimizing processing conditions for chemical peeling of potatoes using response surface methodology. J Food Sci1993;58:8216.10.1111/j.1365-2621.1993.tb09367.xSuche in Google Scholar

35. SomsenD, CapelleA, TramperJ. Manufacturing of par-fried french-fries part 2: modeling yield efficiency of peeling. J Food Eng2004;61:199207.10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00093-1Suche in Google Scholar

36. FlorosJD, ChinnanMS. Microstructural changes during steam peeling of fruits and vegetables. J Food Sci1988;53:84953.10.1111/j.1365-2621.1988.tb08969.xSuche in Google Scholar

37. FlorosJD, WetzsteinHY, ChinnanMS. Chemical (NaOH) peeling as viewed by scanning electron microscopy: pimiento peppers as a case study. J Food Sci1987;52:131220.10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb14071.xSuche in Google Scholar

38. BayindirliL, BayindirliA, ŞahinS, ŞumnuG, GiderS. Studies on caustic peeling of apples. J Food Sci Technol1996;33:2402.Suche in Google Scholar

39. GuldasM. Peeling and the physical and chemical properties of kiwi fruit. J Food Process Preservation2003;27:27184.10.1111/j.1745-4549.2003.tb00517.xSuche in Google Scholar

40. FlorosJD, ChinnanMS. Diffusion phenomena during chemical (NaOH) peeling of tomatoes. J Food Sci1990;55:5523.10.1111/j.1365-2621.1990.tb06808.xSuche in Google Scholar

41. SchultzRW, SmithGA. Additives raise peeling efficiency. Food Eng1968;40:95.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-5-20
Published in Print: 2014-6-1

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review Article
  3. The Effect of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Food and Feed and Their Impact on Food Safety
  4. Research Articles
  5. Milk-Coagulating Extract Produced from Solanum aethiopicum Shum Fruits: Multivariate Techniques of Preparation, Thermal Stability and Effect on Milk Solids Recovery in Curd
  6. Optimal Removal of Experimental Points to Determine Apparent Thermal Diffusivity of Canned Products
  7. Mathematical Modelling of Heat Transfer in Mortadella Bologna PGI during Evaporative Pre-Cooling
  8. Preparation of Oxidized Starch Using Environment Friendly Chlorine Dioxide as Oxidant
  9. Assessment of Quality Attributes of Banana Slices Dried by Different Drying Methods
  10. Effects of High Hydrostatic Pressure Treated Mung Bean Starch on Characteristics of Batters and Crusts from Deep-Fried Pork Nuggets
  11. Exergy and Energy Analysis, Drying Kinetics and Mathematical Modeling of White Mulberry Drying Process
  12. Convective Drying of Apples: Kinetic Study, Evaluation of Mass Transfer Properties and Data Analysis using Artificial Neural Networks
  13. Identification of Eggshell Crack using BPNN and GANN in Dynamic Frequency Analysis
  14. Optimization of Osmotic Dehydration of Seedless Guava (Psidium guajava L.) in Sucrose Solution using Response Surface Methodology
  15. Effects of Screw Speed and Sesame Cake Level on Optimal Operation Conditions of Expanded Corn Grits Extrudates
  16. Evaluation and Optimization of Steam and Lye Peeling Processes of Sweet Potato (Ipomea batatas) using Response Surface Methodology (RSM)
  17. Physical Properties of Naked Oat Seeds (Avena nuda L.)
Heruntergeladen am 14.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijfe-2013-0051/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen