Home Optimization of Osmotic Dehydration of Seedless Guava (Psidium guajava L.) in Sucrose Solution using Response Surface Methodology
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Optimization of Osmotic Dehydration of Seedless Guava (Psidium guajava L.) in Sucrose Solution using Response Surface Methodology

  • Ali Ganjloo EMAIL logo , Russly A. Rahman , Jamilah Bakar , Azizah Osman and Mandana Bimakr
Published/Copyright: March 15, 2014

Abstract

In this study, osmotic dehydration of seedless guava was studied through response surface methodology. Seedless guava cubes were dehydrated in sucrose solution at different concentration (30–50% w/w), temperature (30–50°C) and immersion time (15–240 min) with respect to weight reduction, solid gain and water loss. A Box–Behnken design was used to determine the optimum processing conditions that yield maximum weight reduction, water loss and minimum solid gain. The models developed for all responses were significant (p<0.05). The response surface plots were constructed to show the interaction of process variables. Optimum process conditions were found to be sucrose concentration of 33.79% w/w, temperature of 30.00°C and immersion time of 240 min through desirability function method. At these optimum points, weight reduction, solid gain and water loss were found to be 0.189 (gg−1), 0.050 (gg−1) and 0.237 (gg−1), respectively.

References

1. GanjlooA, RahmanRA, OsmanA, BakarJ, BimakrM. Kinetics of crude peroxidase inactivation and color changes of thermally treated seedless guava (Psidium guajava L) . Food Bioprocess Technol2009;5:21519.Search in Google Scholar

2. CárcelJA, BeneditoJ, RosselloC, MuletA. Influence of ultrasound intensity on mass transfer in apple immersed in a sucrose solution . J. Food Eng2007;78:4729.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.10.018Search in Google Scholar

3. LazaridesHN, KatsanidisE, NickolaidisA. Mass transfer during osmotic pre concentration aiming at minimal solid uptake . J. Food Eng1995;25:15166.10.1016/0260-8774(94)00006-USearch in Google Scholar

4. MizrahiS, EichlerS, RamonO. Osmotic dehydration in gel systems . J. Food Eng2001;49:8796.10.1016/S0260-8774(00)00208-9Search in Google Scholar

5. WaliszewskiKN, PardioVT, RamirezM. Effect of EDTA on color during osmotic dehydration of banana slices . Drying Technol2002;20:12918.10.1081/DRT-120004052Search in Google Scholar

6. KarA, GuptaDK. Osmotic dehydration characteristics of button mushrooms . J Food Sci Technol-Mysore2001;38:3527.Search in Google Scholar

7. RastogiNK, RaghavaraoKS. Water and solute diffusion coefficient as a function of temperature and concentration during osmotic dehydration . J Food Eng1997;34:42940.10.1016/S0260-8774(98)80034-4Search in Google Scholar

8. CollignanA, Raoult-WackAL. Dewatering and salting of cod by immersion in concentrated sugar/salt solutions . LWTechnol – Food Sci Technol1994;27:25964.10.1006/fstl.1994.1052Search in Google Scholar

9. El-AouarAA, AzoubelPM, Barbosa Jr JL, MurrFE. Influence of the osmotic agent on the osmotic dehydration of papaya (Carica papaya L) . J Food Eng2006;75:26774.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.04.016Search in Google Scholar

10. MavroudisNE, GekasV, SjoholmI. Osmotic dehydration of apples-effects of agitation and raw material characteristics . J Food Eng1998;35:191209.10.1016/S0260-8774(98)00015-6Search in Google Scholar

11. BiswalRN, BozorgmehrK. Mass transfer in mixed soluteosmotic dehydration of apple rings . Trans ASAE1992;35:25760.10.13031/2013.28597Search in Google Scholar

12. VijayanandP, ChandN, EipesonWE. Optimization ofosmotic dehydration of cauliflower . Food Process Preserv1995;19:22942.10.1111/j.1745-4549.1995.tb00291.xSearch in Google Scholar

13. PontingJD. Osmotic dehydration of fruit-recent modification and applications . Process Biochem1973;12:1820.Search in Google Scholar

14. AraujoEA, MurrFE. Optimization of osmotic dehydrationof nectarine (Prunus persica) using response surfacemethodology . In: 13th international drying symposium, Beijing, China, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

15. MentingLC, HoegstadB, ThijssenHA. Diffusion coefficients of water and organic volatiles in carbohydrates-water systems . J Food Sci1970;5:11117.10.1111/j.1365-2621.1970.tb01549.xSearch in Google Scholar

16. CorzoO, GomesER. Optimization of osmotic dehydration of cantaloupe using desired function methodology . J Food Eng2004;64:21319.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2003.09.035Search in Google Scholar

17. DenizB, BoyaciIH. Modeling and optimization I: usability of response surface methodology . J Food Eng2007;78:83645.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.11.024Search in Google Scholar

18. BoxGE, DraperNR. Empirical model building and response surfaces. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1987.Search in Google Scholar

19. KhuriAI, CornellJA. Response surfaces: designs and analyses. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

20. BoxGE, WilsonKB. On the experimental attainment ofoptimum conditions . J R Stat Soc1951;1:3145.Search in Google Scholar

21. GiovanniM. Response surface methodology and productoptimization . Food Technol1983;37:415.Search in Google Scholar

22. ErenI, Kaymak-ErtekinF. Optimization of osmotic dehydration of potato using response surface methodology . J Food Eng2007;79:34452.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.01.069Search in Google Scholar

23. OzdemirM, OzenBF, DockLL, FlorosJD. Optimization ofosmotic dehydration of diced green peppers by responsesurface methodology . LWT – Food Sci Technol2008;41:204450.10.1016/j.lwt.2008.01.010Search in Google Scholar

24. SinghB, PanesarPS, NandaV, BeraMB. Optimization ofosmotic dehydration process of carrot cubes in sodiumchloride solution . Int J Food Eng2008;4:124.10.1111/j.1745-4530.2007.00173.xSearch in Google Scholar

25. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. Washington: Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1990.Search in Google Scholar

26. PanagiotouNM, KaranthonosVT, MaroulisZB. Effect ofosmotic rehydration of fruits . J Food Sci Technol1999;17:17589.Search in Google Scholar

27. Liyana-PathiranaC, ShahidiF. Optimization of extraction of phenolic compounds from wheat using response surface methodology . Food Chem2005;93:4756.10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.08.050Search in Google Scholar

28. MirhosseiniH, TanCP, HamidNS, YusofS, BooHC.Characterization of the influence of main emulsion components on the physicochemical properties of orange beverage emulsion using response surface methodology . Food Hydrocolloids2009;23:27180.10.1016/j.foodhyd.2008.02.007Search in Google Scholar

29. MyersRH, MontgomeryDH. Response surface methodology. New York: Wiley, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

30. CapanzanaMV, BuckleKA. Optimisation of germinationconditions by response surface methodology of a highamylose rice (Oryza sativa) cultivar . LWT – Food Sci Technol1997;30:15563.10.1006/fstl.1996.0142Search in Google Scholar

31. ChuaSC, TanCP, MirhosseiniH, LaiOM, LongK, BaharinBS. Optimization of ultrasound extraction condition of phospholipids from palm-pressed fiber . J Food Eng2009;92:4039.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.12.013Search in Google Scholar

32. JokićA, GyuraJ, LevićL, ZavargoZ. Osmotic dehydration of sugar beet in combined aqueous solutions of sucrose and sodium chloride . J Food Eng2007;78:4751.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.09.003Search in Google Scholar

33. AzoubelPM, MurrFE. Optimisation of osmotic dehydration of cashew apple (Anacardium occidentale L.) In sugar solutions . Food Sci Technol Int2003;9:42733.10.1177/1082013203040908Search in Google Scholar

34. LazeridesHN, GekasV, MavroudisN. Apparent mass diffusivities in fruit and vegetable tissues undergoing osmotic processing . J Food Eng1997;31:31524.10.1016/S0260-8774(96)00084-2Search in Google Scholar

35. UddinBM, AinsworthP, IbanogluS. Evaluation of mass exchange during osmotic dehydration of carrots using response surface methodology . J Food Eng2004;65:4737.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.02.007Search in Google Scholar

36. Prakash MaranJ, SivakumarV, ThirugnanasambandhamK, SridharR. Artificial neural network and response surface methodology modeling in mass transfer parameters predictions during osmotic dehydration of Carica papaya L . Alexandria Eng J2013;52:50716.10.1016/j.aej.2013.06.007Search in Google Scholar

37. MontgomeryDH. Design and analysis of experiments, 5th ed. New York: Wiley, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-3-15
Published in Print: 2014-6-1

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review Article
  3. The Effect of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Food and Feed and Their Impact on Food Safety
  4. Research Articles
  5. Milk-Coagulating Extract Produced from Solanum aethiopicum Shum Fruits: Multivariate Techniques of Preparation, Thermal Stability and Effect on Milk Solids Recovery in Curd
  6. Optimal Removal of Experimental Points to Determine Apparent Thermal Diffusivity of Canned Products
  7. Mathematical Modelling of Heat Transfer in Mortadella Bologna PGI during Evaporative Pre-Cooling
  8. Preparation of Oxidized Starch Using Environment Friendly Chlorine Dioxide as Oxidant
  9. Assessment of Quality Attributes of Banana Slices Dried by Different Drying Methods
  10. Effects of High Hydrostatic Pressure Treated Mung Bean Starch on Characteristics of Batters and Crusts from Deep-Fried Pork Nuggets
  11. Exergy and Energy Analysis, Drying Kinetics and Mathematical Modeling of White Mulberry Drying Process
  12. Convective Drying of Apples: Kinetic Study, Evaluation of Mass Transfer Properties and Data Analysis using Artificial Neural Networks
  13. Identification of Eggshell Crack using BPNN and GANN in Dynamic Frequency Analysis
  14. Optimization of Osmotic Dehydration of Seedless Guava (Psidium guajava L.) in Sucrose Solution using Response Surface Methodology
  15. Effects of Screw Speed and Sesame Cake Level on Optimal Operation Conditions of Expanded Corn Grits Extrudates
  16. Evaluation and Optimization of Steam and Lye Peeling Processes of Sweet Potato (Ipomea batatas) using Response Surface Methodology (RSM)
  17. Physical Properties of Naked Oat Seeds (Avena nuda L.)
Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijfe-2012-0117/html
Scroll to top button