The Chinese Adolescent Materialism Scale: psychometric properties and normative profiles

References

1. Belk RW. Three scales to measure constructs related to materialism: reliability, validity, and relationships to measures of happiness. Adv Consum Res 1984;11:291–7.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Richins ML, Dawson S. Materialism as a consumer value: measure development and validation. J Consum Res 1992;19:303–16.10.1086/209304Suche in Google Scholar

3. Richins ML. The Material Values Scales: measurement properties and development of a short form. J Consum Res 2004;31:209–19.10.1086/383436Suche in Google Scholar

4. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 2000;55:68–78.10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68Suche in Google Scholar

5. Kasser T, Ryan RM. A dark side of the American dream: correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. J Pers Soc Psychol 1993;65:410–22.10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.410Suche in Google Scholar

6. Kasser T, Ryan RM. Further examining the American dream: differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1996;22:280–7.10.1177/0146167296223006Suche in Google Scholar

7. Kasser T. The high price of materialism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2002.10.7551/mitpress/3501.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

8. Goldberg ME, Gorn GJ, Peracchio LA, Bamossy G. Understanding materialism among youth. J Consum Res 2003;13:278–88.10.1207/S15327663JCP1303_09Suche in Google Scholar

9. Ku L, Dittmar H, Banerjee R. Are materialistic teenagers less motivated to learn? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence from the United Kingdom and Hong Kong. J Educ Psychol 2012;104:74–86.10.1037/a0025489Suche in Google Scholar

10. Williams GC, Hedberg VA, Cox EM, Deci EL. Extrinsic life goals and health – risk behaviors in adolescents. J Appl Soc Psychol 2000;30:1756–71.10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02466.xSuche in Google Scholar

11. John DR. Consumer socialization of children: a retrospective look at twenty-five years of research. J Consum Res 1999;26:183–213.10.1086/209559Suche in Google Scholar

12. Kasser T, Ryan RM, Couchman CE, Sheldon KM. Materialistic values: their causes and consequences. In: Kasser T, Kanner AD, editors. Psychology and consumer culture: the struggle for a good life in a materialistic world. Washington, DC: American Psychology Association, 2004:11–28.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Schaefer AD, Hermans CM, Parker RS. A cross-cultural exploration of materialism in adolescents. Int J Consum Stud 2004;28:399–411.10.1111/j.1470-6431.2004.00395.xSuche in Google Scholar

14. Lee TY, Shek DT, Kwong WM. Chinese approaches to understanding and building resilience in at-risk children and adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin North Am 2007;16:377–92.10.1016/j.chc.2006.12.001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Commission on Youth. Youth in Hong Kong: a statistical profile 2010. Hong Kong: Hong Kong SAR, 2010. Available at: http://www.coy.gov.hk/filemanager/template/common/images/research/youth_report_20110520_c.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Yip Y. Reasons for excessive consumption of young people. Sharp Daily. Available at: http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20121101/18054379.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Banerjee R, Dittmar H. Individual differences in children’s materialism: the role of peer relations. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2008;34:17–31.10.1177/0146167207309196Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Kim H, Markus HR. Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999; 77:785–800.10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.785Suche in Google Scholar

19. Chan K, Prendergast G. Materialism and social comparison among adolescents. Soc Behav Personal 2007;35:213–28.10.2224/sbp.2007.35.2.213Suche in Google Scholar

20. Chan K. Materialism among Chinese children in Hong Kong. Young Consum 2003;4:47–61.10.1108/17473610310813988Suche in Google Scholar

21. Shek DT. Adolescent developmental issues in Hong Kong: relevance to positive youth development programs in Hong Kong. J Adolesc Med Health 2006;18:341–54.10.1515/IJAMH.2006.18.3.341Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Shek DT, Ma HK, Sun RC. A brief overview of adolescent developmental problems in Hong Kong. ScientificWorldJournal 2011;11:2243–56.10.1100/2011/896835Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Eastman JK, Fredenberger B, Campbell D, Calvert S. The relationship between status consumption and materialism: a cross-cultural comparison of Chinese, Mexican, and American students. J Market Theor Pract 1997;5:52–66.10.1080/10696679.1997.11501750Suche in Google Scholar

24. Moschis GP, Churchill GA Jr. Consumer socialization: a theoretical and empirical analysis. J Marketing Res 1978;15:599–609.10.1177/002224377801500409Suche in Google Scholar

25. Chowdhury RM, Fernando M. The role of spiritual well-being and materialism in determining consumers’ ethical beliefs: an empirical study with Australian consumers. J Bus Ethics 2013;113:61–79.10.1007/s10551-012-1282-xSuche in Google Scholar

26. Muncy JA, Eastman JK. Materialism and consumer ethics: an exploratory study. J Bus Ethics 1998;17:137–45.10.1023/A:1005723832576Suche in Google Scholar

27. Giacalone RA, Jurkiewicz CL, Deckop JR. On ethics and social responsibility: the impact of materialism, postmaterialism, and hope. Hum Relat 2008;61:483–514.10.1177/0018726708091019Suche in Google Scholar

28. Roberts BW, Robins RW. Broad dispositions, broad aspirations: the intersection of personality traits and major life goals. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2000;26:1284–96.10.1177/0146167200262009Suche in Google Scholar

29. Konrath SH, O’Brien EH, Hsing C. Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time: a meta-analysis. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2011;15:180–98.10.1177/1088868310377395Suche in Google Scholar

30. Sheldon KM, Kasser T. Coherence and congruence: two aspects of personality integration. J Pers Soc Psychol 1995;68:531–43.10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.531Suche in Google Scholar

31. Humphries ML, Jagers RJ. Culture: a possible predictor of morality for African American adolescents. J Res Adolescence 2009;19:205–15.10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00590.xSuche in Google Scholar

32. Schwartz SH. Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? J Soc Issues 1994;50:19–45.10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.xSuche in Google Scholar

33. Schwartz SH. Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 1992;25:1–65.10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6Suche in Google Scholar

34. Burroughs JE, Rindfleisch A. Materialism and well-being: a conflicting values perspective. J Consum Res 2002;29:348–70.10.1086/344429Suche in Google Scholar

35. Shek DT. The spirituality of the Chinese people: a critical review. In: Bond MH, editor. Oxford Handbook of Chinese psychology. New York, NY: The Oxford University Press, 2010:343–66.Suche in Google Scholar

36. Kilbourne W, Grünhagen M, Foley J. A cross-cultural examination of the relationship between materialism and individual values. J Econ Psychol 2005;26:624–41.10.1016/j.joep.2004.12.009Suche in Google Scholar

37. Grouzet FM, Kasser T, Ahuvia A, Dols JM, Kim Y, Lau S, et al. The structure of goal contents across 15 cultures. J Pers Soc Psychol 2005;89:800–16.10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.800Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Kashdan TB, Breen WE. Materialism and diminished well-being: experiential avoidance as a mediating mechanism. J Soc Clin Psychol 2007;26:521–39.10.1521/jscp.2007.26.5.521Suche in Google Scholar

39. Stillman TF, Fincham FD, Vohs KD, Lambert NM, Phillips CA. The material and immaterial in conflict: spirituality reduces conspicuous consumption. J Econ Psychol 2012;33:1–7.10.1016/j.joep.2011.08.012Suche in Google Scholar

40. Shek DT, Siu AM, Lee TY. The Chinese positive youth development scale: a validation study. Res Social Work Prac 2007;17:380–91.10.1177/1049731506296196Suche in Google Scholar

41. Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, Strahan EJ. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods 1999;4:272–99.10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272Suche in Google Scholar

42. Curran PJ, West SG, Finch JF. The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychol Methods 1996;1:16–29.10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16Suche in Google Scholar

43. Finney SJ, DiStefano C. Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In: Hancock GR, Mueller RO, editors. Structural equation modeling: a second course. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, 2006:269–314.Suche in Google Scholar

44. Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004.10.4324/9781410610904Suche in Google Scholar

45. Tanaka JS. Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993:10–39.Suche in Google Scholar

46. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 1999;6:1–55.10.1080/10705519909540118Suche in Google Scholar

47. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL 8.80: structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International, 2006.Suche in Google Scholar

48. Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 1974;39:31–6.10.1007/BF02291575Suche in Google Scholar

49. Pett MA, Lackey NR, Sullivan JJ. Making sense of factor analysis. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage, 2003.10.4135/9781412984898Suche in Google Scholar

50. Widaman KF. Common factor analysis versus principal component analysis: differential bias in representing model parameters? Multivar Behav Res 1993;28:263–311.10.1207/s15327906mbr2803_1Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

51. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford, 1998.Suche in Google Scholar

52. Hewitt PL, Blasberg JS, Flett GL, Besser A, Sherry SB, Caelian C, et al. Perfectionistic self-presentation in children and adolescents: development and validation of the Perfectionistic Self-Presentation Scale – Junior Form. Psychol Assess 2011;23:125–42.10.1037/a0021147Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

53. Mick DG. Are studies of dark side variables confounded by socially desirable responding? The case of materialism. J Consum Res 1996;23:106–19.10.1086/209470Suche in Google Scholar