Using structural equation modeling to examine consumption of pornographic materials in Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong

References

1. Conger RD, Conger KJ. Understanding the processes through which economic hardship influences families and children. In: Crane DR, Heaton TB, editors. Handbook of families and poverty. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2008:64–81.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Conger RD, Donnellan MB. An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development. Annu Rev Psychol 2007;58:175–99.10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085551Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Sun RC, Shek DT. Life satisfaction, positive youth development and problem behaviour among Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Soc Indic Res 2010;95:455–74.10.1007/s11205-009-9531-9Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Sun RC, Shek DT. Positive youth development, life satisfaction and problem behaviour among Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong: a replication. Soc Indic Res 2012;105:541–59.10.1007/s11205-011-9786-9Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Shek DT, Tsoi KW, Lau PS, Tsang SK, Lam MC, Lam CM. Psychological well-being, school adjustment and problem behavior in Chinese adolescents: do parental qualities matter? Int J Adolesc Med Health 2001;13:231–43.10.1515/IJAMH.2001.13.3.231Suche in Google Scholar

6. Shek DT. Chinese cultural beliefs about adversity: its relationship to psychological well-being, school adjustment and problem behavior in Chinese adolescents with and without economic disadvantage. Childhood 2004; 11:63–80.10.1177/0907568204040185Suche in Google Scholar

7. Sullivan MJ, Thorn B, Rodgers W, Ward C. Path model of psychological antecedents to pain experience: experimental and clinical findings. Clin J Pain 2004;20:164–73.10.1097/00002508-200405000-00006Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Deimling GT, Smerglia VL, Schaefer ML. Family environment and decision-making satisfaction on caregiver depression: a path analytic model. J Aging Health 2001;13:47–71.10.1177/089826430101300103Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Shek DT. A longitudinal study of Hong Kong adolescents’ and parents’ perceptions of family functioning and well-being. J Genet Psychol 1998;159:389–403.10.1080/00221329809596160Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Shek DT. Longitudinal study of the relationship between family functioning to adolescent psychological well-being. J Youth Stud 1998;1:195–209.10.1080/13676261.1998.10593006Suche in Google Scholar

11. Shek DT. Family functioning and psychological well-being, school adjustment, and problem behavior in Chinese adolescent girls experiencing economic disadvantage. Fam Ther 2002;29:33–48.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Shek DT, Ma HK, Sun RC. A brief overview of adolescent developmental problems in Hong Kong. ScientificWorldJournal 2011;11:2243–56.10.1100/2011/896835Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Shek DT, Ma HK, Sun RC. Development of a new curriculum in a positive youth development program: the Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong. ScientificWorldJournal 2011;11:2207–18.10.1100/2011/289589Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Shek DT, Ma CM. Impact of the Project P.A.T.H.S. in the junior secondary school years: objective outcome evaluation based on eight waves of longitudinal data. ScientificWorldJournal 2012; DOI: 10.1100/2012/170345.10.1100/2012/170345Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Shek DT, Yu L. Longitudinal impact of the Project P.A.T.H.S. on adolescent risk behavior: what happened after five years. ScientificWorldJournal 2012; doi: 10.1100/2012/316029.10.1100/2012/316029Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Shek DT, Siu AM, Lee TY. The Chinese Positive Youth Development Scale: a validation study. Res Soc Work Prac 2007;12:380–91.10.1177/1049731506296196Suche in Google Scholar

17. Shek DT, Ma CM. Dimensionality of the Chinese Positive Youth Development Scale: confirmatory factor analyses. Soc Indic Res 2010;98:41–59.10.1007/s11205-009-9515-9Suche in Google Scholar

18. Shek DT. Assessment of family functioning: the Chinese version of the Family Assessment Device. Res Soc Work Prac 2002;12:502–24.10.1177/1049731502012004003Suche in Google Scholar

19. Shek DT. Assessment of family functioning Chinese adolescents: the Chinese Family Assessment Instrument. In: Singh NN, Ollen-Dick T, Singh AN, editors. International perspectives on child and adolescent mental health. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2002:297–316.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Siu AM, Shek DT. Psychometric properties of the Chinese Family Assessment Instrument in Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Adolescence 2005;40:817–30.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Shek DT, Ma CM. The Chinese Family Assessment Instrument (C-FAI): hierarchical confirmatory factor analyses and factorial invariance. Res Soc Work Prac 2010;20:112–23.10.1177/1049731509355145Suche in Google Scholar

22. Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley, 1989.10.1002/9781118619179Suche in Google Scholar

23. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL 8.80: structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International, 2006.Suche in Google Scholar

24. Steiger JH, Lind JC. Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA, 1980.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 1990;107:238–46.10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Bentler PM, Bonnet DC. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull 1980;88:588–606.10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588Suche in Google Scholar

27. Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2004.10.4324/9781410610904Suche in Google Scholar

28. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equat Model 1999;6:1–55.10.1080/10705519909540118Suche in Google Scholar

29. Kline RB. Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford, 2005.Suche in Google Scholar

30. Satorra A, Bentler PM. Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In: von Eye A, Clogg CC, editors. Latent variables analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994:399–419.Suche in Google Scholar

31. Finney SJ, DiStefano C. Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In: Hancock GR, Mueller RO, editors. Structural equation modeling: a second course. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, 2006:269–312.Suche in Google Scholar

32. Hooper D, Couglan J, Mullen MR. Structural equation modeling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Business Res Methods 2008;6:53–60.Suche in Google Scholar

33. Miles J, Shevlin M. A time and a place for incremental fit indices. Pers Indiv Diff 2007;42:869–74.10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.022Suche in Google Scholar

34. Hald GM. Gender differences in pornography consumption among young heterosexual Danish adults. Arch Sex Behav 2006;35:577–85.10.1007/s10508-006-9064-0Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Cameron KA, Salazar LF, Bernhardt JM, Burgess-Whitman N, Wingood GM, DiClemente RJ. Adolescents’ experience with sex on the web: results from online focus groups. J Adolesc 2005;28:535–40.10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.10.006Suche in Google Scholar PubMed