Startseite Numerical and experimental investigations on enhancement mixing performance of multi-blade stirring system for fluids with different viscosities
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Numerical and experimental investigations on enhancement mixing performance of multi-blade stirring system for fluids with different viscosities

  • Qiyang Zhang , Shibo Wang EMAIL logo , Hua Wang , Jianxin Xu , Chunlin Li und Qingtai Xiao
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 10. Januar 2023
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The poor mixing caused by zinc powder deposition in purification process is a serious problem which can’t be avoided in treatment of zinc-containing solid waste. Here, to enhance the purification efficiency of zinc-containing solid waste treatment reactor, two kinds of multi-blade combined stirring systems are compared with single layer four straight-blade and double-layer straight-blade (DFB) stirring systems which are traditionally chosen by industry. This study simulated and explored the flow field characteristics and purification effects of these four kinds of stirred-tank reactor, further proposes the unit ion purification energy (UIPE) as a criterion for purification energy consumption and effect evaluation. The results show that multi-blade combined (MBC) stirring system enhances axial flow by 12.56% in water. Meanwhile it effectively inhibits the growth of isolated mixing region which scope has decreased by 56.25%. In high viscosity Carboxymethylcellulose sodium solution, the fluid axial speed can be increased by up to 1407 times with MBC. MBC can increase the purification rate by 24.79% while the UIPE decreases by 29.45% compared with DFB which is used in industrial purification process. MBC paddle has exhibited a wide range of fluid viscosity applicability and axial velocity improvement effect. The improvement increases collisions between the impurity particles and the zinc powder particles, which increased rate of substitution reactions. The application of MBC solves the purification problem in the process of treating zinc-containing solid waste.


Corresponding author: Shibo Wang, National Joint Engineering Research Center of Energy Saving and Environmental Protection Technology in Metallurgy and Chemical Engineering Industry, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, Yunnan, China; and Engineering Research Center of Metallurgical Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction, Ministry of Education, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, Yunnan, China, E-mail:

Funding source: Scientific Research Fund Project of Yunnan Education Department

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2021J0063

Award Identifier / Grant number: 52166004

Award Identifier / Grant number: 202101AU070031

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant number 52166004), Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province, China (No. 202101AU070031) and Scientific Research Fund Project of Yunnan Education Department, China (No. 2021J0063). The authors wish to especially thank the referees for numerous detailed questions and comments that greatly improved the presentation.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

Adams, L. W., and M. Barigou. 2007. “CFD Analysis of Caverns and Pseudo-caverns Developed during Mixing of Non-newtonian Fluids.” Chemical Engineering Research and Design 85 (A5): 598–604, https://doi.org/10.1205/cherd06170.Suche in Google Scholar

Aubin, J., D. F. Fletcher, and C. Xuereb. 2004. “Modeling Turbulent Flow in Stirred Tanks with CFD: The Influence of the Modeling Approach, Turbulence Model and Numerical Scheme.” Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 28 (5): 431–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2003.04.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Barin, I., O. Knacke, and O. Kubaschewski. 2014. Thermochemical Properties of Inorganic Substances: Supplement. Aachen: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Suche in Google Scholar

Bourne, J. 1969. “An Analysis of the Flow Produced by Helical Ribbon Impellers.” Chemical Engineering Research and Design 47: 11–7, https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450470508.Suche in Google Scholar

Fan, Y., C. Li, S. Wang, H. Wang, Y. Wei, J. Xu, and Q. Xiao. 2022. “Enhancement of Mixing Efficiency in Mechanical Stirring Reactors via Chaotic Stirring Techniques: Application to the Treatment of Zinc-Containing Solid Waste.” Chemical Engineering Science 249: 117367, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2021.117367.Suche in Google Scholar

Guo, W., B. Xi, C. Huang, J. Li, Z. Tang, W. Li, C. Ma, and W. Wu. 2021. “Solid Waste Management in China: Policy and Driving Factors in 2004-2019.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 173: 105727, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105727.Suche in Google Scholar

Hashimoto, S., H. Ito, and Y. Inoue. 2009. “Experimental Study on Geometric Structure of Isolated Mixing Region in Impeller Agitated Vessel.” Chemical Engineering Science 64 (24): 5173–81, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2009.08.024.Suche in Google Scholar

Hashimoto, S., K. Natami, and Y. Inoue. 2011. “Mechanism of Mixing Enhancement with Baffles in Impeller-Agitated Vessel, Part I: A Case Study Based on Cross-Sections of Streak Sheet.” Chemical Engineering Science 66 (20): 4690–701, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.06.032.Suche in Google Scholar

Hashimoto, S., N. Ohmura, S.-J. Kim, and S. B. Ibrahim. 2012. “Advances in Mixing Technology: Recent Advances in Mixing Research and Development.” International Journal of Chemical Engineering 2012: 1–2, https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/316891.Suche in Google Scholar

Hirata, Y. 1991. “LDA Studies of Velocity Distributions and Cavern Sizes in a Yield Stress Fluid Agaitated by a Rushton Turbine.” In Paper presented at the Proc. of the 7th European Conf. on Mixing.Suche in Google Scholar

Jaworski, Z., A. Pacek, and A. Nienow. 1994. “On Flow Close to Cavern Boundaries in Yield Stress Fluids.” Chemical Engineering Science 49 (19): 3321–4, https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(94)e0075-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Joshi, J. B., N. K. Nere, C. V. Rane, B. N. Murthy, C. S. Mathpati, A. W. Patwardhan, and V. V. Ranade. 2011. “Cfd Simulation of Stirred Tanks: Comparison of Turbulence Models. Part I: Radial Flow Impellers.” Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 89 (1): 23–82, https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.20446.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, T., Z. T. Jia, Q. H. Zhang, C. Yang, and Z. S. Mao. 2019. “Comparison of Macro-Mixing Characteristics of a Stirred Tank with Different Impellers.” CIESC Journal 70 (1): 32–8.Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, Z. H., H. J. Wei, X. Xiong, C. Y. Tao, Y. D. Wang, and F. Q. Cheng. 2020. “Chaotic Mixing Performance Enhanced by Rigid-Flexible Impeller with Long-Short Blades in Stirred Tank.” CIESC Journal 71 (11): 5080–9.Suche in Google Scholar

Luan, D. Y., Y. M. Chen, H. Wang, Z. R. Wang, S. S. Wang, and L. B. Li. 2019. “Formation of Heart-Shaped Cavern Model in Stirring Pseudoplastic Fluid with the Impeller of Perturbed Six-Bend-Blade Turbine.” AIChE Journal 65 (5), https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16572.Suche in Google Scholar

Metzner, A. B., and R. E. Otto. 1957. “Agitation of Non-newtonian Fluids.” AIChE Journal 3 (1): 3–10, https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690030103.Suche in Google Scholar

Mule, G. M., and A. A. Kulkarni. 2016. “Mixing of Medium Viscosity Liquids in a Stirred Tank with Fractal Impeller.” Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering 50 (6): 914–21, https://doi.org/10.1134/s0040579516060105.Suche in Google Scholar

Ng, K., N. J. Fentiman, K. C. Lee, and M. Yianneskis. 1998. “Assessment of Sliding Mesh CFD Predictions and LDA Measurements of the Flow in a Tank Stirred by a Rushton Impeller.” Chemical Engineering Research and Design 76 (A6): 737–47, https://doi.org/10.1205/026387698525315.Suche in Google Scholar

Roman, R. V., and R. Z. Tudose. 1997a. “Studies on Transfer Processes in Mixing Vessels: Effect of Particles on Gas-Liquid Hydrodynamics Using Modified Rushton Turbine Agitators.” Bioprocess Engineering 16: 135–44, https://doi.org/10.1007/s004490050300.Suche in Google Scholar

Roman, R. V., and R. Z. Tudose. 1997b. “Studies on Transfer Processes in Mixing Vessels: Effect of Particles on Gas-Liquid Mass Transfer Using Modified Rushton Turbine Agitators.” Bioprocess Engineering 17: 361–5, https://doi.org/10.1007/s004490050398.Suche in Google Scholar

Roman, R. V., and R. Z. Tudose. 1997c. “Studies on Transfer Processes in Mixing Vessels: Power Consumption of the Modified Rushton Turbine Agitators in Three-phase Systems.” Bioprocess Engineering 17: 307–16, https://doi.org/10.1007/s004490050390.Suche in Google Scholar

Shi, Y., F. Dong, and C. Tan. 2009. “Conductance Probe for the Measurement of Liquid Volume Fraction and Axial Velocity in Gas-Liquid Two Phase Flow.” In 2009 9th International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments 2-826-822-831.10.1109/ICEMI.2009.5274438Suche in Google Scholar

Singh, H., D. F. Fletcher, and J. J. Nijdam. 2011. “An Assessment of Different Turbulence Models for Predicting Flow in a Baffled Tank Stirred with a Rushton Turbine.” Chemical Engineering Science 66 (23): 5976–88, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.08.018.Suche in Google Scholar

Sossa-Echeverria, J., and F. Taghipour. 2015. “Computational Simulation of Mixing Flow of Shear Thinning Non-newtonian Fluids with Various Impellers in a Stirred Tank.” Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification 93: 66–78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2015.04.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Varjani, S., A. V. Shah, S. Vyas, and V. K. Srivastava. 2021. “Processes and Prospects on Valorizing Solid Waste for the Production of Valuable Products Employing Bio-Routes: A Systematic Review.” Chemosphere 282, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130954.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Visscher, F., J. van der Schaaf, T. A. Nijhuis, and J. C. Schouten. 2013. “Rotating Reactors – A Review.” Chemical Engineering Research and Design 91 (10): 1923–40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2013.07.021.Suche in Google Scholar

Wu, B. X. 2011. “CFD Investigation of Turbulence Models for Mechanical Agitation of Non-newtonian Fluids in Anaerobic Digesters.” Water Research 45 (5): 2082–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.12.020.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Xiao, Q. T., Y. X. Zhang, X. L. Zhu, J. X. Xu, J. X. Pan, and H. Wang. 2018. “Novel 3-D Homogeneity Metrics of Multiple Components in Gas-Stirred Liquid Systems.” Powder Technology 336: 210–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.05.043.Suche in Google Scholar

Xie, T., Y. Luo, G. Li, and A. Ma. 2020. “Cobalt Removal Process of High Cobalt Sulfate Zinc Solution with Two Stages of High Temperature Purification. [Article].” Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals 30 (10): 2410–7.Suche in Google Scholar

Xu, J., Q. Xiao, Z. Lv, J. Huang, R. Xiao, J. Pan, and H. Wang. 2019. “New Metrics for Measuring Multiphase Mixing Effects in a Direct-Contact Heat Exchanger.” Applied Thermal Engineering 147: 592–601, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.10.074.Suche in Google Scholar

Xu, Y., B. Wu, and P. Luo. 2020. “Investigation on the Flow Characteristics of a Novel Multi-Blade Combined Agitator by Time-Resolved Particle Image Velocimetry and Large Eddy Simulation.” AIChE Journal 66 (8): e16277, https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16277.Suche in Google Scholar

Yang, D. J., G. Xie, G. S. Zeng, J. K. Wang, and R. X. Li. 2006. “Mechanism of Cobalt Removal from Zinc Sulfate Solutions in the Presence of Cadmium.” Hydrometallurgy 81 (1): 62–6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2005.08.008.Suche in Google Scholar

Zadghaffari, R., J. S. Moghaddas, and J. Revstedt. 2010. “Large-eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flow in a Stirred Tank Driven by a Rushton Turbine.” Computers & Fluids 39 (7): 1183–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.03.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Zeng, G. S., G. Xie, J. K. Wang, and D. J. Yang. 2005. “Effect and Mechanism of Sodium Sulfite on Cobalt Removal from Zinc Sulphate Solution.” Journal of Rare Earths 23: 57–9.Suche in Google Scholar

Zeng, G. S., G. Xie, D. J. Yang, J. K. Wang, X. Li, and R. X. Li. 2006. “The Effect of Cadmium Ion on Cobalt Removal from Zinc Sulfate Solution.” Minerals Engineering 19 (2): 197–200, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2005.05.010.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, B., and C. L. Liang. 2015. “A Simple, Efficient, and High-Order Accurate Curved Sliding-Mesh Interface Approach to Spectral Difference Method on Coupled Rotating and Stationary Domains.” Journal of Computational Physics 295: 147–60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2015.04.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, L., K. Yang, M. Li, Q. Xiao, and H. Wang. 2022. “Enhancement of Solid-Liquid Mixing State Quality in a Stirred Tank by Cascade Chaotic Rotating Speed of Main Shaft.” Powder Technology 397: 117020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2021.11.064.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhou, Z. A., C. H. Guang, H. X. Gan, T. Z. Yang, and C. H. Lin. 2013. “Ge and Cu Recovery from Precipitating Vitriol Supernatant in Zinc Plant.” Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 23 (5): 1506–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1003-6326(13)62623-0.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-08-02
Accepted: 2022-12-16
Published Online: 2023-01-10

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 30.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2022-0151/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen