The technical and economic analysis of processing and conversion of heavy oil cuts to valuable refinery products

Vahid Pirouzfar; Fariba Mohamadkhani; Nguyen Van Nguyen; Chia-Hung Su

doi:10.1515/ijcre-2022-0127

Article

The technical and economic analysis of processing and conversion of heavy oil cuts to valuable refinery products

Vahid Pirouzfar , Fariba Mohamadkhani , Nguyen Van Nguyen and Chia-Hung Su

Published/Copyright: February 9, 2023

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information

From the journal International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering Volume 21 Issue 8

Abstract

Many of the modern refineries are founded on converting/upgrading the heavy bases of low value to lighter products by higher added value like gasoline, jet fuel and diesel fuel. In this work, some process configurations in heavy refinery cracking, converting and treating are technically and economically evaluated. In this purpose, four process configurations for refinery plants are suggested. These processes are evaluated and analyzed to obtain the most optimal configurations with the aim of achieving the most valuable refinery products. The difference of the processes is in heavy residue conversion and processing. These processes are included the Asphalt Air Blowing Unit (AABU, Type 1), Delayed Coker Unit (DCU, Type 2), Heavy Residue Hydro-Conversion (HRH, Type 3) and Solvent De-Asphalting (SDA, Type 4). The units are common in mentioned refineries cases and just ABU, HCU, DCU, HRH and SDA are different. In economic consideration, the payout period is considered as one of the standard methods of assessing the economic projects and economically estimating them. As results, the highest rate of gasoline is recorded in the refinery type of DCU unit and the highest amount of LPG/C4/C3, kerosene and gasoline production observed in refinery type of HRH unit. The construction of refinery with ABU unit has minimum investment (980 million $) and highest rate of return (19.4).

Keywords: distillation heavy residue; economic and technical analysis; heavy crude oils; refineries upgrading

Corresponding authors: Vahid Pirouzfar, Department of Chemical Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran, E-mail: v.pirouzfar@iauctb.ac.ir; and Chia-Hung Su, Department of Chemical Engineering, Ming Chi University of Technology, New Taipei City, Taiwan, E-mail: chsu@mail.mcut.edu.tw

Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

Albers, J. E. 1996. “Modeling of a Delayed Coker.” Doctoral diss., Texas Tech University.Search in Google Scholar

Cao, Y., M. Mohammadian, V. Pirouzfar, C. H. Su, and A. Khan. 2021. “Break Even Point Analysis of Liquefied Natural Gas Process and Optimization of its Refrigeration Cycles with Technical and Economic Considerations.” Energy 237: 121643, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121643.Search in Google Scholar

Couch, K. A., J. P. Glavin, D. A. Wegerer, and J. A. Qafisheh. 2007. “FCC Propylene Production.” Petroleum Technology Quarterly 12 (4): 33–43.Search in Google Scholar

Dehaghani, A. S., and V. Pirouzfar. 2018. “Investigation on the Effect of Microalgae Chlorella Sp. And Spirulina on Biodiesel Production.” Petroleum Chemistry 58 (8): 702–8, https://doi.org/10.1134/s0965544118080042.Search in Google Scholar

Dehaghani, A. H. S., V. Pirouzfar, and A. Alihosseini. 2020. “Novel Nanocomposite Membranes-Derived Poly (4-Methyl-1-Pentene)/functionalized Titanium Dioxide to Improve the Gases Transport Properties and Separation Performance.” Polymer Bulletin 77 (12): 6467–89, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-019-03086-2.Search in Google Scholar

Dillon, C. J., M. J. Armstong, S. W. Davey, W. C. Cheng, L. J. Hunt, C. J. Schult, and S. K. Purnellc. 2004. “Optimum Residuum to Clean Fuels Upgrade via Strategic RDS/RFCC Catalyst Design.”In Abstracts of Papers American Chemical Society (Vol. 228, pp. U658-U658). 1155 16TH ST, NW, Washington, DC 20036 USA: Amer Chemical Soc.Search in Google Scholar

Dong, X. J., J. N. Shen, Z. F. Ma, and Y. J. He. 2022. “Robust Optimal Operation of Continuous Catalytic Reforming Process under Feedstock Uncertainty.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 47 (84): 35641–54, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.08.161.Search in Google Scholar

Elliott, J. D. 1991. “Design, Operation Factors Can up Coker Liquid yields.[Delayed Liquid Cooling].” Oil & Gas Journal 89 (5).Search in Google Scholar

Glagoleva, O. F., and V. M. Kapustin. 2020. “Improving the Efficiency of Oil Treating and Refining Processes.” Petroleum Chemistry 60 (11): 1207–15, https://doi.org/10.1134/s0965544120110092.Search in Google Scholar

Haizmann, R. S., P. Hunt, A. Srinivas, and S. Banerjee. 2012. “Maximize Return from Every Barrel: Proven Residue Upgrading Technology.” Journal of Petrofed 11: 38.Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, K., C. Ibsen, T. Solberg, and B. Hjertager. 2003. “Eulerian/Eulerian CFD Simulation of a Cold Flowing FCC Riser.” International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering 1 (1), https://doi.org/10.2202/1542-6580.1032.Search in Google Scholar

Hashemzehi, M., V. Pirouzfar, H. Nayebzadeh, and A. Alihosseini. 2020. “Application of Response Surface Methodology to Optimize High Active Cu-Zn-Al Mixed Metal Oxide Fabricated via Microwave-Assisted Solution Combustion Method.” Advanced Powder Technology 31 (4): 1470–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2020.01.010.Search in Google Scholar

Hydrocarbon Processing’s 2008 Refining Processes Handbook, 2008–2842. Gulf publishing company.Search in Google Scholar

Kivevele, T., T. Raja, V. Pirouzfar, B. Waluyo, and M. Setiyo. 2020. “LPG-Fueled Vehicles: An Overview of Technology and Market Trend.” Automotive Experiences 3 (1): 6–19, https://doi.org/10.31603/ae.v3i1.3334.Search in Google Scholar

Li, X., G. Li, Z. Xu, and H. Sui. 2011. “A New Downstream Process Design for a Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit to Raise Propylene Yield and Decrease Gasoline Olefin Content.” Petroleum Science and Technology 29 (24): 2601–12, https://doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2010.521786.Search in Google Scholar

Lu, C., Y. Zhang, and M. Shi. 2013. “A Historic Review on R&D of China’s FCC Riser Termination Device Technologies.” International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering 11 (1): 225–42, https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2012-0063.Search in Google Scholar

McKeen, T., and T. S. Pugsley. 2003. “Simulation of Cold Flow FCC Stripper Hydrodynamics at Small Scale Using Computational Fluid Dynamics.” International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering 1 (1), https://doi.org/10.2202/1542-6580.1034.Search in Google Scholar

Mehri, B., V. Pirouzfar, S. Bagheri, and M. Z. Pedram. 2017. “Modelling and Optimization of Exhaust Pollutants and the Properties and Characteristics of Ethanol-Diesel through a Statistical Approach.” Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 95 (6): 1054–62, https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.22765.Search in Google Scholar

Nguyen, D. D., A. Habibi, A. Ghadami, V. Pirouzfar, and C. H. Su. 2020. “Technical and Economic Analysis of Conventional and Supercritical Transesterification for Biofuel Production.” Chemical Engineering & Technology 43 (10): 1922–9, https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.202000058.Search in Google Scholar

Nguyen, D. D., F. A. Atiku, V. Pirouzfar, and C. H. Su. 2021. “Technical, Economic and Thermodynamic Analysis for Loading, Storing, Unloading and Transporting of Ethane Fluid.” Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 120: 218–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2021.03.035.Search in Google Scholar

Pinheiro, C. I., J. L. Fernandes, L. Domingues, A. J. Chambel, I. Graça, N. M. Oliveira, and F. R. Ribeiro. 2012. “Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) Process Modeling, Simulation, and Control.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 51 (1): 1–29, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie200743c.Search in Google Scholar

Pirouzfar, V., and A. Fayyazbakhsh. 2016. Diesel Fuel Additives. Deutschland: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Pirouzfar, V., A. Zarringhalam Moghaddam, and B. Mirza. 2012. “Physicochemical Properties and Combustion Performance of Gas Oil–Fuel Additives.” Journal of Energy Resources Technology 134 (4): 41101. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4007483.Search in Google Scholar

Rana, M. S., V. Sámano, J. Ancheyta, and J. A. I. Diaz. 2007. “A Review of Recent Advances on Process Technologies for Upgrading of Heavy Oils and Residua.” Fuel 86 (9): 1216–31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.08.004.Search in Google Scholar

Rezaie, F., V. Pirouzfar, and A. Alihosseini. 2020. “Technical and Economic Analysis of Acrylonitrile Production from Polypropylene.” Thermal Science and Engineering Progress 16: 100463, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2019.100463.Search in Google Scholar

Rio, D. D., U. Sedran, and G. de la Puente. 2012. “Adsorption of Thiophenic Compounds in the Gasoline Boiling Range over FCC Catalysts under Process Conditions.” International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering 10 (1), https://doi.org/10.1515/1542-6580.2870.Search in Google Scholar

Sadeghbeigi, R. 2000. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Handbook: Design, Operation, and Troubleshooting of FCC Facilities. Elsevier, Gulf Professional Publishing.10.1016/B978-088415289-7/50009-3Search in Google Scholar

Sawarkar, A. N., A. B. Pandit, S. D. Samant, and J. B. Joshi. 2007. “Petroleum Residue Upgrading via Delayed Coking: A Review.” Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 85 (1): 1–24, https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450850101.Search in Google Scholar

Schabron, J. F., and J. G. Speight. 1997. “An Evaluation of the Delayed-Coking Product Yield of Heavy Feedstocks Using Asphaltene Content and Carbon Residue.” Revue de l’Institut Français du Petrole 52 (1): 73–85, https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst:1997006.10.2516/ogst:1997006Search in Google Scholar

Sohrabi, N., A. Alihosseini, V. Pirouzfar, and M. Z. Pedram. 2020. “Analysis of Dynamics Targeting CNT-Based Drug Delivery through Lung Cancer Cells: Design, Simulation, and Computational Approach.” Membranes 10 (10): 283, https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10100283.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Tandon, D., G. S. Dang, and M. O. Garg. 2010. Needle Coke Quality-Effect Of Operating Paral , 1 leters.Search in Google Scholar

Wallace, P. S., M. K. Anderson, A. I. Rodarte, and W. E. Preston. 1998. “Heavy Oil Upgrading by the Separation and Gasification of Asphaltenes.” In Gasification Technologies Conference, 1–11.Search in Google Scholar

Wilczura-Wachnik, H. 2013. Catalytic Cracking of Hydrocarbons. University of Warsaw, Faculty of Chemistry.Search in Google Scholar

Yan, H., M. Zhao, X. Feng, S. Zhao, X. Zhou, S. Li, M. Zha, F. Meng, X. Chen, Y. Liu, D. Chen, N. Yan, and C. Yang. 2022. “PO43− Coordinated Robust Single-Atom Platinum Catalyst for Selective Polyol Oxidation.” Angewandte Chemie 61: e202116059, https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202116059.Search in Google Scholar

Zuideveld, P. L., Q. Chen, and P. J. W. M. Van den Bosch. 2000. “Integration of Gasification with Thermal Residue Conversion in Refineries.” Gasification Technologies Conference, Vol. 2000.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-06-19

Accepted: 2022-12-26

Published Online: 2023-02-09

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2022-0127

Keywords for this article

distillation heavy residue; economic and technical analysis; heavy crude oils; refineries upgrading