Startseite Naturwissenschaften A Study of the Soft-Sphere Model in Eulerian-Lagrangian Simulation of Gas-Liquid Flow
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

A Study of the Soft-Sphere Model in Eulerian-Lagrangian Simulation of Gas-Liquid Flow

  • , , EMAIL logo und
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 2. Juni 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Eulerian-Lagrangian method is becoming more and more popular for the simulation of dispersed multiphase flow as the computational ability grows. An important issue in this method is the handle of collisions. Until now, both hard-sphere and soft-sphere models have been used extensively in the simulation of gas-solid systems while in gas-liquid systems only the hard-sphere model is used. This study presents an investigation of the performance of the soft-sphere model in gas-liquid systems. The open source software OpenFOAM is utilized to complete our simulations. We simulated the 2D Becker case to give a preliminary study of the suitability of the soft-sphere model in gas-liquid systems. We tested the normal stiffness coefficient from 50 N/m to 0.01 N/m and found that the coefficient 1 N/m predicted sufficiently accurate flow field. In the simulation of 3D Deen case, we tried more stiffness coefficients and found that the soft-sphere model successfully predicted the fluid velocity, and the result at a normal stiffness coefficient of 1 N/m is the optimum. It can be expected that the soft-sphere model is also suitable in gas-liquid systems.

Funding statement: Funding: The authors wish to acknowledge the long term support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 91434121), Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. 2013BAC12B01) and State Key Laboratory of Multiphase complex systems (Grant No. MPCS-2015-A-03) and Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDA07080301).

References

1. Becker, S., Sokolichin, A., Eigenberger, G., 1994. Gas-liquid flow in bubble columns and loop reactors: part ii. Comparison of detailed experiments and flow simulations. Chemical Engineering Science 49, 5747–5762.10.1016/0009-2509(94)00290-8Suche in Google Scholar

2. Busaryev, O., Dey, T.K., Wang, H., Ren, Z., 2012. Animating bubble interactions in a liquid foam. ACM Transactions on Graphics 31, 63–70.10.1145/2185520.2185559Suche in Google Scholar

3. Cundall, P.A., Strack, O.D.L., 1979. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29, 47–65.10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47Suche in Google Scholar

4. Darmana, D., Deen, N.G., Kuipers, J.A.M., 2006. Parallelization of an Euler–Lagrange model using mixed domain decomposition and a mirror domain technique: Application to dispersed gas–liquid two-phase flow. Journal of Computational Physics 220, 216–248.10.1016/j.jcp.2006.05.011Suche in Google Scholar

5. Deen, N.G., Solberg, T., Hjertager, B.H., 2001. Large eddy simulation of the Gas-liquid flow in a square cross-sectioned bubble column. Chemical Engineering Science 56, 6341–6349.10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00249-4Suche in Google Scholar

6. Delnoij, E., Lammers, F.A., Kuipers, J.A.M., van Swaaij, W.P.M., 1997. Dynamic simulation of dispersed gas-liquid two-phase flow using a discrete bubble model. Chemical Engineering Science 52, 1429–1458.10.1016/S0009-2509(96)00515-5Suche in Google Scholar

7. Feng, Y.Q., Schwarz, M.P., Yang, W., Cooksey, M.A., 2015. Two-Phase CFD Model of the Bubble-Driven Flow in the Molten Electrolyte Layer of a Hall–Héroult Aluminum Cell. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B 46, 1959–1981.10.1007/s11663-015-0355-5Suche in Google Scholar

8. Goldschmidt, M.J.V., Kuipers, J.A.M., Van Swaaij, W.P.M., 2001. Hydrodynamic modeling of dense gas-fluidized beds using the kinetic theory of granular flow: effect of coefficient of restitution on bed dynamics. Chemical Engineering Science 56, 571–578.10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00262-1Suche in Google Scholar

9. Gruber, M.C., Radl, S., Khinast, J.G., 2013. Coalescence and break-up in bubble columns: Euler-Lagrange simulations using a stochastic approach. Chemie Ingenieur Technik 85, 1118–1130.10.1002/cite.201300024Suche in Google Scholar

10. Hoomans, B.P.B., Kuipers, J.A.M., Briels, W.J., Van Swaaij, W.P.M., 1996. Discrete particle simulation of bubble and slug formation in a two-dimensional gas-fluidised bed: a hard-sphere approach. Chemical Engineering Science 51, 99–118.10.1016/0009-2509(95)00271-5Suche in Google Scholar

11. Hu, Gusheng., Celik, Ismail., 2008. Eulerian–Lagrangian based large-eddy simulation of a partially aerated flat bubble column. Chemical Engineering Science 63, 253–271.10.1016/j.ces.2007.09.015Suche in Google Scholar

12. Lau, Y.M., Bai, W., Deen, N.G., Kuipers, J.A.M., 2014. Numerical study of bubble break-up in bubbly flows using a deterministic Euler–Lagrange framework. Chemical Engineering Science 108, 9–22.10.1016/j.ces.2013.12.034Suche in Google Scholar

13. Mattson, M.D., Mahesh, K., 2012. A one-way coupled, Euler–Lagrangian simulation of bubble coalescence in a turbulent pipe flow. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 40, 68–82.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.11.013Suche in Google Scholar

14. Peng, Z., Doroodchi, E., Luo, C., Moghtaderi, B., 2014. Influence of void fraction calculation on fidelity of CFD-DEM simulation of gas-solid bubbling fluidized beds. AIChE Journal 60, 2000–2018.10.1002/aic.14421Suche in Google Scholar

15. Sokolichin, A., Eigenberger, G., 1999. Applicability of the standard k–e turbulence model to the dynamic simulation of bubble columns: part i. Detailed numerical simulations. Chemical Engineering Science 54, 2273–2284.10.1016/S0009-2509(98)00420-5Suche in Google Scholar

16. Sommerfeld, M., Bourloutski, E., Bröder, D., 2003. Euler/Lagrange calculations of bubbly flows with consideration of bubble coalescence. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 81, 508–518.10.1002/cjce.5450810324Suche in Google Scholar

17. Sungkorn, R., Derksen, J.J., Khinast J.G., 2011. Modeling of turbulent gas–liquid bubbly flows using stochastic Lagrangian model and lattice-Boltzmann scheme. Chemical Engineering Science 66, 2745–2757.10.1016/j.ces.2011.03.032Suche in Google Scholar

18. Tomiyama, A., 1998. Struggle with computational bubble dynamics. Third International Conference on Multiphase Flow, ICMF’98, Lyon, France.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Xiao, Q., Yang, N., Li, J., 2013. Stability-constrained multi-fluid CFD models for gas–liquid flow in bubble columns. Chemical Engineering Science, 100, 279–292.10.1016/j.ces.2013.02.027Suche in Google Scholar

20. Xue, J., Chen, F., Yang, N., Ge, W., 2016. Applicability of the soft-sphere model in bubbly flow, Master Thesis, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences. China.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Yang, N., Chen, J., Zhao, H., Ge, W., Li, J., 2007. Explorations on the multi-scale flow structure and stability condition in bubble columns. Chemical Engineering Science 62, 6978–6991.10.1016/j.ces.2007.08.034Suche in Google Scholar

22. Yang, N., Wu, Z., Chen, J., Wang, Y., Li, J., 2011. Multi-scale analysis of gas-liquid interaction and CFD simulation of gas-liquid flow in bubble columns. Chemical Engineering Science 66, 3212–3222.10.1016/j.ces.2011.02.029Suche in Google Scholar

23. Ye, M., Van der Hoef, M.A., Kuipers, J.A.M., 2004. A numerical study of fluidization behavior of Geldart a particles using a discrete particle model. Powder Technology 139, 129–139.10.1016/j.powtec.2003.10.012Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-6-2
Published in Print: 2017-1-1

©2017 by De Gruyter

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Bubble Trajectory in a Bubble Column Reactor using Combined Image Processing and Artificial Neural Network
  2. Non-linear Radiation Effects in Mixed Convection Stagnation Point Flow along a Vertically Stretching Surface
  3. Mixing Behaviors of Jets in Cross-Flow for Heat Recovery of Partial Oxidation Process
  4. Selective Hydrogenation of 4’,4”(5”)-Di-Tert-Butyldibenzo-18-Crown-6 Ether over Rh/γ-Al2O3 Nanocatalyst
  5. Titania-Loaded Coal Char as Catalyst in Oxidation of Styrene with Aqueous Hydrogen Peroxide
  6. A Study of the Soft-Sphere Model in Eulerian-Lagrangian Simulation of Gas-Liquid Flow
  7. Conceptual Approach in Multi-Objective Optimization of Packed Bed Membrane Reactor for Ethylene Epoxidation Using Real-coded Non-Dominating Sorting Genetic Algorithm NSGA-II
  8. Kinetics of Extraction of Tributyl phosphate (TBP) from Aqueous Feed in Single Stage Air-sparged Mixing Unit
  9. Viscous Dissipation Effects in Water Driven Carbon Nanotubes along a Stream Wise and Cross Flow Direction
  10. Evaluation of Mixing and Mixing Rate in a Multiple Spouted Bed by Image Processing Technique
  11. A Parametric Study of Biodiesel Production Under Ultrasounds
  12. Numerical Study of MHD Viscoelastic Fluid Flow with Binary Chemical Reaction and Arrhenius Activation Energy
  13. CFD Analysis and Design Optimization in a Curved Blade Impeller
  14. Bio-Oil Heavy Fraction as a Feedstock for Hydrogen Generation via Chemical Looping Process: Reactor Design and Hydrodynamic Analysis
  15. Upgrading of Heavy Oil in Supercritical Water using an Iron based Multicomponent Catalyst
Heruntergeladen am 21.3.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2016-0064/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen