Home A facile synthesis of 2H-chromen-2-ones via Pechmann condensation under solvent free conditions using grinding technique
Article Publicly Available

A facile synthesis of 2H-chromen-2-ones via Pechmann condensation under solvent free conditions using grinding technique

  • Dinesh Sharma

    Dr. Dinesh Sharma obtained his PhD degree in Organic Chemistry in the year 2011 and is currently working as Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemistry, BRCM College of Engineering and Technology, Bahal, Bhiwani-127028, India. His current research is focused on the development of eco friendly methodologies for the synthesis of organic compounds.

    EMAIL logo
    and Surender Kumar

    Dr. Surender Kumar received his PhD degree in Organic Chemistry in the year 2005 and is currently working as Associate Professor in the Department of Chemistry, Technological Institute of Textile and Sciences, Bhiwani-127021, India. His research interests are the development of green methods of organic synthesis and phase transfer catalysis.

Published/Copyright: February 20, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A simple and highly efficient procedure for the synthesis of 2H-chromen-2-ones via von Pechmann condensation, involving the grinding of different phenols and β-ketoesters in the presence of silica supported sulfuric acid at room temperature, under solvent free conditions, has been described.

1 Introduction

2H-Chromen-2-ones, commonly known as coumarins, are naturally occurring oxygen heterocyclic compounds which have a distinct and important place in natural and synthetic organic chemistry, as they have been found to exhibit varying degrees of biological activities, namely, antibacterial, antiviral, anticancer and anti HIV [1–3]. These have been reported to display activity against several types of animal tumors [4], prostate cancer and metastatic renal cell carcinoma [5] and have also been used as additives in food, cosmetics [6], optical brighteners [7], dispersed fluorescent and laser dyes [8].

Due to the importance of the 2H-chromen-2-ones, continuous efforts have been made to simplify the procedures for the synthesis of these compounds, which include use of Pechmann and Duisberg [9], Perkin and Henry [10], Knoevenagal [11], Reformatsky [12] and Wittig [13] reactions. Among these, the Pechmann condensation is considered to be one of the most important, as it requires simple starting materials. A large number of condensing agents such as strong acids H2SO4, HCl, H3PO4, F3CCOOH, solid super acid [9, 14–16], Lewis acids such as ZnCl2, FeCl3, AlCl3, BF3·2H2O, ZnCl2/Al2O3, ZrCl4 [14–18] and ion exchange resins [19]have been used in the Pechmann condensation. Recently, the use of microwaves [20], ionic liquid as a Lewis acid [21], Zn/I2 [22], Yb(OTf)3 [23], LiBr [24], I2 [25], CoPy2Cl2 [26], p-TSA [27], BTSA/SiO2 [28] and polyvinyl sulfonic acid [29] has also been reported.

Some of the above mentioned reagents possess limitations, such as the use of harsh or hazardous chemicals, mainly organic solvents, expensive and large amount of reactants, a longer reaction time, elevated temperature and the formation of side products. The shortcomings led us to develop a safe and more efficient method for the Pechmann condensation.

A survey of the literature reveals that silica supported sulfuric acid has been used as a versatile solid acid catalyst for various types of reactions [30–34]. The grinding technique has been considered to be an important tool to carry out the reactions under solvent free conditions, with maximum yield and minimum cost, and it has got much attention due to its operational simplicity [35–37]. In continuation of our work to develop simple green procedures for the synthesis of heterocyclic compounds using acid catalysts [27], we report a highly efficient method for the synthesis of 2H-chromen-2-ones via Pechmann condensation, using silica supported sulfuric acid under solvent free conditions using the grinding technique.

2 Experimental part

Melting points were determined in open capillaries using a Thiele tube. A mortar and pestle of porcelain was used for all the experiments. Silica gel (>99%), ethyl acetoacetate (>99%), 1-chloroethylacetoacetate (95%), benzoyl acetoacetate (90%), resorcinol (99%) and phloroglucinol (>99%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals, New Delhi, India. Pyrogallol with >98% purity was also purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals. 1-Naphthol (>99%), 2-naphthol (>99%), ethyl acetate (99.9%) and sulfuric acid with 98% purity were received from Merck, Mumbai, India. Silica supported sulfuric acid was prepared by the procedure as reported in the literature [38].

2.1 Preparation of H2SO4·SiO2

To a dispersion of silica gel (10 g, 230–400 mesh) in diethyl ether (50 ml), 3ml of conc. H2SO4 was added with shaking for 5 min. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure to get H2SO4·SiO2, which was then dried at 110oC for 3 h.

2.2 General procedure for synthesis of 2H-chromen-2-ones 1a-i

A mixture of substituted phenol (1 mmol) and β-ketoester (1 mmol) was grounded with silica supported sulfuric acid (100 mg) in a mortar by pestle for 5 min, until a color change of the reaction mixture took place. The reaction mixture was kept at room temperature for about 10–20 min. The completion of the reaction was checked by thin layer chromatography. The reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate and filtered to recover the catalyst. The filtrate was washed with water and concentrated. The residue obtained was recrystallized from ethanol to give pure 2H-chromen-2-ones in high yield.

3 Results and discussion

In order to study the efficiency of the catalyst, a mixture of resorcinol and ethyl acetoacetate was grounded in the presence of silica supported sulfuric acid (H2SO4·SiO2) in a mortar by a pestle (Scheme 1), which was taken as the model reaction. The progress of the reaction was checked by thin layer chromatography. The reactants were found to have reacted almost completely in 5min and had to be kept at room temperature for another 10–20 min for the completion of the reaction. The optimum conditions of the reaction were achieved by using varying amounts of catalyst and best yields were obtained by using 100 mg of H2SO4·SiO2. No reaction was found to take place in the absence of a catalyst. Further, it was observed that lower concentrations of the catalyst gave lower yields and higher concentrations of the catalyst were found to be of no use, as the reaction was not improved in terms of yield and time (Table 1). This indicates that the best results were obtained by using 100 mg of catalyst in standard reaction under solvent free conditions.

Scheme 1 Synthesis of 2H-chromen-2-ones under solvent free conditions using the grinding technique.
Scheme 1

Synthesis of 2H-chromen-2-ones under solvent free conditions using the grinding technique.

Table 1

Effect of catalyst on model reaction.

Sr. No.Amount of catalyst (mg)Time (min)Yield (%)
10No reaction
250582
3100595
4150592
5200591

To check the reusability of the catalyst, a recycle study was carried out. The catalyst was used for three recycles in a model reaction. In the 1st, 2nd and 3rd recycles, the yields were obtained as 95%, 92% and 88%, respectively. Thus, the recycle results showed no appreciable loss in yields.

The scope of the method was further studied by reacting differently substituted phenols with ethyl acetoacetate, 1-chloroethylacetoacetate and benzoyl acetoacetate, to give corresponding coumarins in excellent yields under solvent free conditions at room temperature. The identity of the products (Table 2) was confirmed by their IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR and mass spectral data and by comparison with authentic samples. Moreover, to illustrate the efficiency and generality of the present protocol, some of the results of our method compared with the literature methods as shown in Table 3. Thus, it is evident that the present protocol is superior to the reported methods in terms of time and yield of the product using the grinding technique.

Table 2

Synthesis of 2H-chromen-2-ones via Pechmann condensation.

CompoundR1R2R3R4Time (min) a+bYield (%)1mp (oC)lit. mp (oC)
1aHOHHCH35+1095182–183185 [26]
1bHOHOHCH35+1097278–280280 [26]
1cOHOHHCH35+1092240–242242 [26]
1dHOHHCH2Cl5+1092178–181180 [26]
1eHOHOHCH2Cl5+1090185–187187 [26]
1fOHOHHCH2Cl5+1085195–197196–198 [25]
1gHOHHPh5+1090255–257257 [26]
1hHOHOHPh5+1082244–246244–246 [24]
1iOHOHHPh5+1080195–197196–198 [24]
1j
5+2090153–155154–155 [25]
1k
5+2086180–182183–184 [25]

a, grinding time; b, time for which the reaction mixture was kept at room temperature; 1Yield after purification.

Table 3

Comparison of the results of the reactions carried out with different catalyst for the synthesis of coumarins with present method.

EntryCatalystsTimeTemp. (oC)Yield (%)Ref.
1H2SO424 hRoom temp.20–82[20]
2CoPy2Cl21.5–3.0 minMW58–96[26]
3I24–8 hRoom temp.60–75[25]
4LiBr15–90 min7554–92[24]
5FeCl3/ionic liquid10–13 h7065–85[39]
6ZrCl45.0–60 min7056–95[15]
7BTSA·SiO21.0–90 min8575–95[28]
8SnCl2·2H2O/EtOH1.15–6 h8034–60[40]
9GaI3/CH2Cl20.7–100 hRoom temp.65–96[41]
10Sc(OTf)31–20 h8074–97[42]
11CAN10–15 min11093–96[43]
12ClSO3H10–25 min1050–98[44]
13W-ZrO2/toluene6 h11050–80[45]
14BF3·2H2O20 min6098–99[17]
15Sm(NO3)3·6H2O15–90 min8045–98[46]
16Oxalic acid45–105 min8078–96[47]
17H2SO4·SiO2/grinding15 minRoom temp.80–97

1Present method.

4 Conclusion

In conclusion it can be stated that the present protocol for the synthesis of 2H-chromen-2-ones via Pechmann condensation, using silica supported sulfuric acid, is simple and highly efficient under solvent free conditions using the grinding technique. This is a mild, rapid and superior method.


Corresponding author: Dinesh Sharma, Department of Chemistry, BRCM College of Engineering and Technology, Bahal, 127028, India

About the authors

Dinesh Sharma

Dr. Dinesh Sharma obtained his PhD degree in Organic Chemistry in the year 2011 and is currently working as Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemistry, BRCM College of Engineering and Technology, Bahal, Bhiwani-127028, India. His current research is focused on the development of eco friendly methodologies for the synthesis of organic compounds.

Surender Kumar

Dr. Surender Kumar received his PhD degree in Organic Chemistry in the year 2005 and is currently working as Associate Professor in the Department of Chemistry, Technological Institute of Textile and Sciences, Bhiwani-127021, India. His research interests are the development of green methods of organic synthesis and phase transfer catalysis.

References

[1] Maxwell A. Mol. Microbiol. 1993, 9, 681–686.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Zembower DE, Liao S, Flavin MT, Xu Z-Q, Stup TL, Buckheit RW Jr, Khilevich A, Mar AA, Sheinkman AK. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 1005–1017.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Wang C-J, Hsieh Y-J, Chu C-Y, Lin Y-L, Tseng T-H. Cancer Lett. 2002, 183, 163–168.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Maucher A, Von Agerer E. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 1994, 120, 502–504.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Marshall ME, Butler K, Fried A. Mol. Biother. 1991, 3, 170–178.Search in Google Scholar

[6] O’Kennedy, R, Thornes, RD. In Coumarins: Biology, Applications and Mode of Action, Wiley & Sons: Chichester, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Zabradnik, M. The Production and Application of Fluorescent Brightening Agents, John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Murry RDH, Mendez J, Brown SA. The Natural Coumarins: Occurrence, Chemistry and Biochemistry, John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1982.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Pechmann VH, Duisberg C. Chem. Ber. 1884, 17, 929–979.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Perkin WH, Henry W Sr. J. Chem. Soc. 1875, 28, 10–11.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Brufola G, Fringuelli F, Piematti O, Pizzo F. Heterocycl. 1996, 43, 1257–1266.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Shirner RL. Org. React. 1942, 1, 15–16.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Mali RS, Tilve SA. Synth. Commun. 1990, 20, 1781–1791.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Wools LL, Sapp J. J. Org. Chem. 1962, 27, 3703–3705.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Smitha G, Reddy CS. Synth. Commun. 2004, 34, 3997–4003.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Jin T, Guo Y, Yin Y, Liu H, Li T. Indian J. Chem. 2003, 42B, 2612–2614.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Stoyanov VE, Jochen M. Molecule 2005, 10, 762–766.10.3390/10070762Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[18] Shockravi A, Valizadeh H, Heravi MM. Phosphor. Sulfur Silic. Relat. Elem. 2003, 178, 143–147.Search in Google Scholar

[19] John EVO, Israelstam SS. J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26, 240–242.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Singh V, Singh J, Kaur KP, Kad GL. J. Chem. Res (S). 1997, 2, 58–59.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Potdar MK, Mohile SS, Salunkhe MM. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 9285–9287.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Chavan SP, Shivasankar K, Sivappa R, Kali R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 8583–8586.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Wang L, Xia J, Tian H, Qian C, Ma Y. Indian J. Chem. 2003, 42B, 2097–2099.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Kumar S, Saini A, Sandhu JS. Arkivoc 2007, 2007 (xv), 18–23.10.3998/ark.5550190.0008.f03Search in Google Scholar

[25] Parjapati D, Gohain M. Catal. Lett. 2007, 119, 59–63.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Madhav JV, Kuarm BS, Someshwar P, Rajitha B, Reddy YRT, Crooks PA. J. Chem. Res (S). 2008, 4, 232–234.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Makrandi JK, Sharma D, Kumar S. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2011, 4, 127–129.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Parhami A, Khalafi-Nezhad A, Haghighi SM, Bargebid R, Zare A, Moosavi-Zare AR, Nikrooz M. Arkivoc. 2012, 2012 (ix), 111–121.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Kuarm BS, Crooks PA, Rajitha B. Internat. J. Res. Pharms. Bio. Sc. 2012, 3, 50–53.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Heravi MM, Ajami D, Ghassemzadeh M. Synth. Commun. 1999, 29, 1013–1016.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Oskooie HA, Heravi MM, Sadnia A, Jannati F, Behbahani FK. Monatash. Chem. 2008, 139, 27–29.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Wu H, Shen Y, Fan L-Y, Wan Y, Zhang P, Chen C-F, Wang W-X. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 2404–2408.10.1016/j.tet.2007.01.015Search in Google Scholar

[33] Shaterian HR, Ghashang M, Feyzi M. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2008, 345, 128–133.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Mohammadpoor-Baltork I, Mirkhani V, Moghadam M, Tangestaninejad S, Zolfigol MA, Abdollahi-Alibeik M, Khosropour AR, Kargar H, Hojati SF. Catal. Commun. 2008, 9, 894–901.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Aakeroy CB, Sinha AS, Epa KN, Spartz CL, Desper J. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 11289–11291.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Sachdeva H, Saroj R, Khaturia S, Dwivedi D. Green Process Synth. 2012, 1, 469–477.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Rahman AFMM, Ali R, Jahng Y, Kadi AA. Molecules 2012, 17, 571–583.10.3390/molecules17010571Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[38] Chen X, She J, Shang Z-C, Wu J, Zhang P. Synth. Commun. 2009, 39, 947–957.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Kumar v, Tomar S, Patel R, Yousaf A, Parmar VS, Malhotra SV. Synth. Commun. 2008, 38, 2646–2654.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Upadhyay KK, Mishra RK, Kumar A. Catal. Lett. 2008, 121, 118–120.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Sun P, Hu Z. Synth. Commun. 2005, 35, 1875–1880.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Jung K, Park Y-J, Ryu J-S. Synth. Commun. 2008, 38, 4395–4406.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Reddy YT, Sonar VN, Crooks PA, Dasari PK, Reddy PN, Rajitha B. Synth. Commun. 2008, 38, 2082–2088.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Kotharkar SA, Bahekar SS, Shinde DB. Mendeleev Commun. 2006, 16, 241–242.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Reddy BM, Reddy VR, Giridhar D. Synth. Commun. 2001, 31, 3603–3607.Search in Google Scholar

[46] Bahekar SS, Shinde DB. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 7999–8001.Search in Google Scholar

[47] Kokare ND, Sangshetti JN, Shinde DB. Chinese Chem. Lett. 2007, 18, 1309–1312.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2012-10-13
Accepted: 2013-1-16
Published Online: 2013-02-20
Published in Print: 2013-04-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Masthead
  2. Masthead
  3. Graphical abstracts
  4. In this Issue
  5. Editorial
  6. Scientific spring metamorphosis
  7. Original articles
  8. Development highlights of micro-nano technologies in the MENA region and pathways for initiatives to support and network
  9. Integrated processing for the separation of biobutanol. Part A: experimental investigation and process modelling
  10. Integrated processing for the separation of biobutanol. Part B: model-based process analysis
  11. Direct saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass by hydrolysis with formic acid solution
  12. A facile synthesis of 2H-chromen-2-ones via Pechmann condensation under solvent free conditions using grinding technique
  13. Counter-current arrangement of microfluidic liquid-liquid droplet flow contactors
  14. Organization profiles
  15. The Centre for Green Process Engineering (CGPE) opens with launch event at London South Bank University (LSBU)
  16. King Saud University: nanoscience and nanotechnology research highlights
  17. Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research
  18. University profile
  19. Nanoscience and nanotechnology research highlights at Kuwait University
  20. Laboratory profiles
  21. Microfluidics Group – Department of Chemistry, Sultan Qaboos University
  22. Assiut Microfluidics Laboratory
  23. Company profiles
  24. Hikma Pharmaceuticals
  25. SÜSS MicroTec and iX-factory: qualified process and equipment support for development, research and production – made in Germany
  26. LionX: our chips enable your products
  27. Conference announcements
  28. 17th Annual Green Chemistry and Engineering Conference (GC&E; North Bethesda, MD, USA, June 18–20, 2013)
  29. 17th IUPAC Conference on Organometallic Chemistry Directed Towards Organic Synthesis (OMCOS 17), Fort Collins, CO, USA, July 28–August 1, 2013
  30. Conferences 2013/2014
  31. Book review
  32. Chemicals from biomass: integrating bioprocesses into chemical production complexes for sustainable development
Downloaded on 14.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/gps-2012-0068/html?srsltid=AfmBOorNf-m_DNWG4UbZJNqPUVjwFmmDtA17NsDD3Nt2UqkB92293ibh
Scroll to top button