Home Medicine Comparative analysis of monocyte distribution width alterations in Escherichia coli sepsis: insights from in vivo and ex vivo models
Article Open Access

Comparative analysis of monocyte distribution width alterations in Escherichia coli sepsis: insights from in vivo and ex vivo models

  • Daniela Ligi ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Chiara Della Franca ORCID logo , Michela Pelloso ORCID logo , Alicia Martinez-Iribarren ORCID logo , Alba Leis ORCID logo , Erica Fabbri , Francesca Salvatori , Elena A. Sukhacheva , Giorgio Brandi ORCID logo , Giuditta F. Schiavano ORCID logo and Ferdinando Mannello ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: September 18, 2025

Abstract

Objectives

Monocyte distribution width (MDW) is an early sepsis indicator measuring monocyte heterogeneity during massive infection. We compared MDW changes in Escherichia coli sepsis patients with the effects of living E. coli and lipopolysaccharide in an ex vivo sepsis model. We also investigated the dynamics of monocyte morpho-functional and inflammatory responses in the sepsis model.

Methods

Whole blood from healthy participants was in vitro stimulated with live E. coli (106–1010 CFU/mL) and LPS (0.1–10 μg/mL). Complete blood counts, including MDW, were evaluated at different time-points using DxH 690T Hematology Analyzer (Beckman Coulter). MDW values were compared with those retrospectively obtained from sepsis patients (n=23). May-Grunwald-Giemsa-stained blood smears were analyzed by digital cell morphology (CellaVision DM software). A panel of 27 inflammatory mediators was quantified in plasma (Bio-Plex 200).

Results

MDW values were early and significantly increased in a dose- and time-dependent manner by live E. coli and LPS treatments (p<0.01). MDW values were significantly higher in sepsis patients compared to controls and overlapped those observed in the ex vivo model. IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-8, MIP1-α, MIP-1β, Eotaxin, G-CSF, and PDGF-bb were significantly modulated after treatments.

Conclusions

Our findings confirm the clinical utility of MDW in sepsis diagnosis and sustain the reliability of the whole blood assay as ex vivo sepsis model. E. coli and LPS directly promote early monocyte morpho-functional modifications, mirrored by high MDW values and pro-inflammatory mediators. These results improve the knowledge on the biological basis of sepsis, providing novel evidence on the usefulness of MDW in septic conditions.

Introduction

Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated host response to infections (Sepsis-3) [1]; this definition emphasizes the crucial role of the individual immune response to a critical infective pathogen, which may be significantly amplified by endotoxins and/or endogenous factors.

Bacterial infections represent the primary cause of sepsis, and Escherichia coli (E. coli) is among the most frequently isolated gram-negative species in sepsis patients [2]. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from the Gram-negative bacterial membrane is the most studied endotoxin, due to its well-known role as trigger of pro-inflammatory and immune responses [3].

Once activated, immune cells mount a series of defensive responses, characterized by hemodynamical changes and blood cell morpho-functional modifications. Moreover, the release of inflammatory mediators and reactive oxygen species from activated immune cells can directly damage endothelial cells and fuel the activation of other immune cells, finally leading to endothelial dysfunctions, micro/macro-circulatory alterations, and multi-organ failure [4]. The kaleidoscope of the immune responses found in sepsis shares these complex cascades and activation mechanisms, with a wide individual variability of the responses [5], being some patients moving from excessive immune activation toward extensive immune suppression, up to a coexistence of simultaneous hyperinflammation and sepsis-induced immune suppression [6].

Several studies have explored the effects of both LPS and living or heat-inactivated E. coli bacteria in a whole blood model to simulate in vitro a sepsis condition and provide insights on inflammatory and immune pathways activated by endotoxins and pathogens [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13].

Monocyte distribution width (MDW) has been CE-marked as an early sepsis indicator in the emergency department, making it a potential marker for the early diagnosis of sepsis [14]. MDW is an IVD parameter available on Beckman Coulter’s DxH690T and DxH900 hematology analysers that quantify the heterogeneity and anisocytosis of the monocyte population circulating in blood. It can be obtained quickly and simultaneously with the complete blood count (CBC) and the differential leukocyte formula, being automatically calculated from the standard deviation of the monocyte volume, through a patented mathematical formula, exploiting the VCS (volume, conductivity, and scatter) technology, using three independent and simultaneous energy sources (direct current impedance to measure cell volume of all cell types; radio frequency opacity to characterize conductivity for the internal composition of each cell; a laser beam to measure light scatter for cytoplasmic granularity and nuclear structure).

Increasing evidence underlines that higher values of MDW are found in sepsis patients, and these values significantly increase with the worsening of the sepsis conditions [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. MDW has been shown to be increased in sepsis of bacterial, viral, and fungal origin, without apparently different levels among pathogens, despite that these microorganisms exploit characteristic and diverse pathways to promote immune activation [20]. Moreover, we recently demonstrated that extracellular histones, acting as DAMP proteins, promote monocyte morpho-functional alterations and a MDW increase [21], [22], [23] in an ex vivo whole blood model.

Here we aimed to compare the MDW alterations measured in patients with sepsis from E. coli with the effects of LPS and living E. coli ex vivo stimulation to investigate both basic mechanisms and pathways established during active infections, with particular emphasis on the ability of LPS and living E. coli to induce morphological alterations in blood cells, MDW modifications, and the ability to trigger a peculiar pattern of cytokine production by blood cells.

Materials and methods

Sample collection, hematological analysis, and digital morphology

Peripheral venous blood was collected in EDTA-K2 tubes (BD Vacutainer®, 6 mL) from healthy adult subjects (n=24 for E. coli studies and n=10 for LPS curve studies) recruited as anonymous volunteers at the Blood Transfusion Centre of the Hospital Santa Maria della Misericordia of Urbino during their periodic blood donation session. Healthy donors fulfill all the requirements needed for blood donation. In detail, the inclusion criteria were donors of all genders, aged 18–65 years, ≥50 kg, BP≤180/100; HR=50/100 bpm; Hb=13.5/12.5 g/dL (M/F), no known hematological, oncological, and infective diseases. Exclusion criteria included: positive tests for HbsAg, anti-HCV antibodies, anti-HIV 1–2 antibodies and HIV 1–2 antigens, anti-Treponema Pallidum (TP) antibodies. All donors signed an informed consent form. Samples were processed within 4 h from blood collection at the Clinical Biochemistry Laboratories of the University of Urbino.

Routine complete blood cell counts and MDW were analysed on a UniCell DxH 690T Hematology Analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, USA). The instrument performance has been daily validated by using three different commercially available internal quality controls: COULTER 6C Plus Cell Control (three concentration levels) to monitor the DxH 690T system performance for CBC, DIFF and NRBC parameters, COULTER Retic-X Cell Control (three concentration levels) for monitoring system performance of the reticulocyte parameters, and COULTER LATRON CP-X Control, a suspension of latex particles of standardized size used to monitor VCSn technology (volume, conductivity, and light scatter measurements). Each sample has been assayed once, except for the samples treated with the highest E. coli concentrations, which required multiple measurements due to the appearance of instrumental flags.

Manually prepared air-dried smears were stained through the automated slide preparation system (Sysmex SP-50) with May-Grunwald-Giemsa-stain for digital cell morphology analyses with the CellaVision DM software (DI-60).

This observational non-interventional ex vivo study was approved by the local Ethical Committee (on the basis of an official document of accordance with the Blood Transfusion Center of “S. Maria della Misericordia” Hospital in Urbino (PU), Italy) and all investigations have been conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki principles as revised in 2013.

Bacterial strain, preparation of bacterial suspensions, and growth condition

The bacterial strain used in this study was E. coli ATCC 25922. Bacteria were routinely grown at 37 °C on Muller–Hinton (MH) agar.

For each experiment, one colony obtained from a fresh culture was transferred in 20 mL of MH broth and incubated at 37 °C for 14–18 h (usually overnight) with the cap slightly loosened.

The next day, the overnight culture was harvested, washed, resuspended twice in saline solution (NaCl 0.9 %), and then adjusted by spectrophotometry at optical densities at 600 nm (OD600), corresponding to a concentration of 1010 colony forming unit (CFU)/mL. Then, from this bacterial suspension, 10-fold serial dilutions in saline solution (NaCl 0.9 %), from 10−1 to 10−4 were prepared in 10 mL final volumes. Aliquots (1 mL) of this dilution were placed into a microcentrifuge tube and centrifuged for 15 min at 6000×g, to form a pellet, and the supernatant was carefully removed with a pipette to ensure the pellet was not dislodged; blood was immediately added to the pellet. Amounts equivalent to a final concentration of 106, 108, and 1010 CFU/mL were used as stimuli for the human whole blood model.

Ten microliters of each dilution of E. coli suspension were plated in triplicate on tryptone soya agar (TSA) plates and incubated at 37 °C for 18–24 h for the final enumeration of CFU/mL.

All culture materials were purchased from Thermo-Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA USA).

Whole blood in vitro stimulation with LPS or living E. coli

Aliquots of 1 mL of EDTA-K2 whole-blood from each volunteer were immediately incubated with 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, and 10 μg/mL of lipopolysaccharide (LPS from E. coli O127:B8, Sigma-Aldrich cod. L3129) or living E. coli suspension to a final concentration of 106, 108, and 1010 CFU/mL at RT (about 25 °C).

CBC results, including MDW, were measured at 0, 30, 60, and 180 min after careful mixing to avoid blood cell sedimentation. After 3 h, all blood samples were centrifuged (2000×g, 15 min) to obtain plasma for further analyses. All tubes, tips and solutions were endotoxin free to avoid artefactual introduction of endotoxin.

Determination of the total protein concentration

Plasma samples were assayed by Bradford Protein Assay (Bio-Rad, USA) to determine the total protein concentration through Onda V-30 Scan Spectrophotometer (Giorgio Bormac, Italy).

MDW measurement in sepsis patients

MDW values and clinical data of sepsis patients (n=23; age range: 44–87 years; age mean: 67 years) diagnosed with E. coli bloodstream infection were retrospectively extracted by data archives of the Laboratory Medicine Department, Laboratori Clínic Metropolitana Nord (LCMN), University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain. At the same time, MDW values and clinical data from unaffected controls (n=135; age range: 19–80 years; age mean: 54 years) were collected to overcome the possible confounding factor due to the different anticoagulants used (EDTA-K3) compared with the ex vivo study.Data from septic patients and control subjects were collected from two different studies carried out in the Emergency Department and Intensive Care Unit of Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital. Both studies were carried out according to the basic ethical principles of the Helsinki Declaration (Fortaleza, October 2013). Both in vivo studies were reviewed and approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital (PI-18-249 and PI-18-140). All patients included in these studies have signed an informed consent previously approved by the CEIC (Ethics Committee for Clinical Investigation).

Cytokine determination by multiplex immunomagnetic assay

After 3 h of treatments, all plasma samples obtained were assayed to evaluate a panel of 27 inflammatory biomarkers through the Pro™ Human Cytokine 27-plex assay (including: IL-1β, IL-1ra, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8/CXCL8, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12(p70), IL-13, IL-15, IL-17, Eotaxin/CCL11, bFGF, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IP-10/CXCL10, MCP-1/CCL2, MIP-1α/CCL3, MIP-1β/CCL4, PDGFbb, RANTES, TNF-α, and VEGF) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BioPlex, Bio-Rad Labs) as previously reported [22]. The cytokine concentrations (pg/mL) were calculated through a 8-point standard curve performed in duplicate.

Statistical analysis

Regarding CBC parameters, differences among groups and times were determined using a mixed-effects model followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. The Mann-Whitney test was selected for comparing MDW differences between two groups and Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s Multiple comparison test was chosen for comparing differences among multiple groups. Concerning inflammatory mediators, differences among groups were determined using a mixed-effects model followed by Dunnet’s multiple comparison test. Values are expressed as mean±standard deviation (SD) unless otherwise specified, and p-values <0.05 were considered significant. All statistical tests were performed using GraphPad Prism 9.0.

Results

Digital morphology analyses

The treatment of whole blood aliquots with increasing concentrations of E. coli and LPS was associated with the early appearance of monocyte anisocytosis. Monocytes lose their round shape with a reniform nucleus (Figure 1A) in favour of an increased cell volume with intracellular vacuolization and nuclear alterations (Figure 1B–G) and clear evidence of phagocytosis of live E. coli bacteria (Figure 1B–E).

Figure 1: 
Digital light microscopy images of peripheral blood monocytes representative of untreated whole blood controls (A), and after 3 h of treatments with E. coli 106 CFU/mL (B, C), E. coli 108 CFU/mL (D, E) and LPS 1 μg/mL (F, G). (May-Grunwald-Giemsa Staining, ×100).
Figure 1:

Digital light microscopy images of peripheral blood monocytes representative of untreated whole blood controls (A), and after 3 h of treatments with E. coli 106 CFU/mL (B, C), E. coli 108 CFU/mL (D, E) and LPS 1 μg/mL (F, G). (May-Grunwald-Giemsa Staining, ×100).

Complete blood count and MDW determination in LPS-stimulated blood samples

CBCs, including MDW, were anonymously determined in 10 healthy donors (6 M, 4 F; age range: 31–65; mean age: 46.1 years) before and after stimulation with increasing LPS doses. MDW values in controls reached a mean ± SD value of 17.4 ± 1.6 at T0, 17.8 ± 1.3 at T30, 17.7 ± 1.9 at T60, and 18.4 ± 1.3 at T180, without significant differences among all times considered.

The in vitro stimulation of whole blood with increasing concentrations of LPS from E. coli induced a significant time- and dose-dependent MDW increase without affecting the monocyte count (Figure 2A–C). In detail, MDW reached values of 20.4 ± 1.6, 21.4 ± 1.4, 23.7 ± 1.7, 27.5 ± 4.1, and 26.9 ± 4.1 (mean ± SD) after 3 h of treatment with 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, and 10.0 μg/mL of bacterial LPS. The two highest concentrations of LPS showed overlapping MDW modifications at each time point explored, highlighting a possible plateau effect (Figure 2A). A representative time- and dose-dependent two-dimensional data plots of all WBC subpopulations separated according to volume and RLSs values is reported in Figure 2D, where the green cloud represents the monocyte population; a focus on the monocyte population is also reported as surface plots (Figure 2E).

Figure 2: 
Time- and dose-dependent MDW variations (A) and monocyte absolute (B) and percentage (C) counts in whole blood stimulated with increasing concentrations of LPS from E. coli (0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, 10 μg/mL). Values are expressed as mean±SD. The table under Figure A reports the significance values resulting from the statistical analysis (the comparisons were calculated among treatments and respective controls at each time). Representative time- and dose-dependent two-dimensional data plots (D) and monocyte surface plots (E) resulting from whole blood stimulated with increasing concentrations of LPS from E. coli (0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, 10 μg/mL). In (D) all WBC subpopulations were separated according to volume and RLSs values; in (E) volume and RLS of monocytes are plotted (RLS, Rotated Light Scatter); in (D) and (E) the monocyte population is represented in green.
Figure 2:

Time- and dose-dependent MDW variations (A) and monocyte absolute (B) and percentage (C) counts in whole blood stimulated with increasing concentrations of LPS from E. coli (0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, 10 μg/mL). Values are expressed as mean±SD. The table under Figure A reports the significance values resulting from the statistical analysis (the comparisons were calculated among treatments and respective controls at each time). Representative time- and dose-dependent two-dimensional data plots (D) and monocyte surface plots (E) resulting from whole blood stimulated with increasing concentrations of LPS from E. coli (0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, 10 μg/mL). In (D) all WBC subpopulations were separated according to volume and RLSs values; in (E) volume and RLS of monocytes are plotted (RLS, Rotated Light Scatter); in (D) and (E) the monocyte population is represented in green.

Complete blood count and MDW determination in E. coli-stimulated blood samples

CBCs and MDW were evaluated in 24 healthy donors (18 M, 6 F; age range: 18–65; mean age: 42.5 years) before and after stimulation with increasing concentrations of live E. coli. MDW values in controls reached a mean ± SD value of 17.2 ± 1.4 at T0 and T30, 17.8 ± 1.6 at T60, and 18.8 ± 1.4 at T180, without significant differences among all times considered. The treatment of whole blood with living E. coli determined a time- and dose-dependent MDW increase (Figure 3A). In detail, E. coli 106 CFU/mL induced a significant time-dependent increase of MDW at 30, 60, and 180 min (mean±SD) vs. respective controls (19.2 ± 2.1, p=0.0078; 20.5 ± 2.2, p<0.0001; 21.7 ± 3.7, p=0.0005, respectively) (Figure 3A).

Figure 3: 
Time- and dose-dependent MDW variations (A) and monocyte absolute (B) and percentage (C) count in whole blood stimulated with increasing concentrations of living E. coli (106, 108, 1010 CFU/mL). Values are expressed as mean±SD. The dotted line indicates normal values. The comparisons were calculated among treatments and respective controls at each time. (∗∗p=0.001–0.01; ∗∗∗p=0.0001–0.001; ∗∗∗∗p<0.0001). Representative time- and dose-dependent two-dimensional data plots (D) and monocyte surface plots (E) resulting from whole blood stimulated with increasing concentrations of live E. coli (106, 108, 1010 CFU/mL). In (D) all WBC subpopulations were separated according to volume and RLSs values; in (E) volume and RLS of monocytes are plotted (RLS, Rotated Light Scatter); in (D) and (E) the monocyte population is represented in green.
Figure 3:

Time- and dose-dependent MDW variations (A) and monocyte absolute (B) and percentage (C) count in whole blood stimulated with increasing concentrations of living E. coli (106, 108, 1010 CFU/mL). Values are expressed as mean±SD. The dotted line indicates normal values. The comparisons were calculated among treatments and respective controls at each time. (∗∗p=0.001–0.01; ∗∗∗p=0.0001–0.001; ∗∗∗∗p<0.0001). Representative time- and dose-dependent two-dimensional data plots (D) and monocyte surface plots (E) resulting from whole blood stimulated with increasing concentrations of live E. coli (106, 108, 1010 CFU/mL). In (D) all WBC subpopulations were separated according to volume and RLSs values; in (E) volume and RLS of monocytes are plotted (RLS, Rotated Light Scatter); in (D) and (E) the monocyte population is represented in green.

MDW increases to 21.2 ± 2.6 (p<0.0001) after 30 min, 23.5 ± 3.4 (p<0.0001) after 60 min, and 26.1 ± 5.0 (p<0.0001) at 180 min were observed by treating whole blood with E. coli 108 CFU/mL.

The treatment with E. coli 1010 CFU/mL promoted a MDW increase to 23.0 ± 2.1 (p<0.0001) after 30 min, 26.3 ± 2.8 (p<0.0001) after 60 min, and 29.0 ± 4.9 (p<0.0001) at 180 min (Figure 3A).

These Gram-negative related MDW modifications were not accompanied by a change in the monocyte population count, neither in the total count (Figure 3B) nor in percentage values (Figure 3C), whose mean values were distributed within the physiological ranges (0,2-1,2 × 1000/µL and 2–12 %, respectively). A representative time- and dose-dependent two-dimensional data plots of all WBC subpopulations separated according to volume and RLSs values is reported in Figure 3D, where the green cloud represents the monocyte population; a focus on the monocyte population is also reported as surface plots (Figure 3E).

MDW determination in sepsis patients

The retrospective analyses of MDW values in sepsis patients affected by E. coli infection, compared with unaffected controls recruited at the same Hospital, revealed that MDW values in sepsis patients were significantly higher compared to control subjects (MDW in sepsis – min-max: 22.4–49.3; median: 28.2; MDW in controls-min-max: 15.2–28.3; median: 20.0; p<0.0001) (Figure 4A).

Figure 4: 
MDW variations in sepsis patients affected by E. coli infection and unaffected controls. In (A) MDW values are expressed as absolute values, as measured by DxH900 in EDTA-K3 samples; in (B) MDW values are reported as percentage fold-of-change to of the values measured in vivo and, in the ex vivo model (further details in the main text). Values are expressed as box and whiskers, showing min to max values, median and 25th to 75th percentiles. Statistical tests: Mann–Whitney (A) and Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s Multiple comparison test (B); *p=0.01–0.05; ****p<0.0001.
Figure 4:

MDW variations in sepsis patients affected by E. coli infection and unaffected controls. In (A) MDW values are expressed as absolute values, as measured by DxH900 in EDTA-K3 samples; in (B) MDW values are reported as percentage fold-of-change to of the values measured in vivo and, in the ex vivo model (further details in the main text). Values are expressed as box and whiskers, showing min to max values, median and 25th to 75th percentiles. Statistical tests: Mann–Whitney (A) and Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s Multiple comparison test (B); *p=0.01–0.05; ****p<0.0001.

Of note, these samples have been collected in EDTA-K3, thus, to ensure a correct comparison between in vivo and ex vivo results, we normalized MDW from patients and treated samples (at 3h) for the median MDW value of the control cohort, and for the corresponding untreated controls in the ex vivo dataset, respectively. The percentage fold-of-change calculated after normalization confirmed the differences emerged in the two models between sepsis patients and controls, as well as between E. coli treated samples and controls, revealing also the absence of significant differences in MDW levels between sepsis patients and whole blood samples ex vivo triggered with E. coli for 3h (Figure 4B).

Cytokine quantification by multiplex Immunomagnetic assay

The total protein content was not significantly different between plasma from controls and E. coli/LPS-stimulated blood cells (mean mg/mL±SD; CTR: 45.8 ± 5.3; EC106 CFU/mL: 45.6 ± 3.9; EC108 CFU/mL: 46.2 ± 4.9; EC1010 CFU/mL: 46.6 ± 3.3; LPS: 45.6 ± 9.1).

After 3 h of treatment with E. coli 106 and 108 CFU/mL (due to multiple CBC readings of E. coli 1010-treated whole blood, the remaining sample volume was not sufficient to quantify the cytokine panel), we observed a dose-dependent increase of peculiar cytokines, as shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5: 
Cytokine values in plasma samples (n=12) from whole blood after 3h of stimulation with increasing concentrations of living E. coli (106 and 108 CFU/mL) and LPS from E. coli (1 µg/mL). (Mixed-effects model followed by Dunnet’s multiple comparison test: ∗p=0.01–0.05; ∗∗p=0.001–0.01; comparisons were calculated among treatments and respective controls). Values are expressed as box and whiskers, showing min to max values, median and 25th to 75th percentiles of the pg/mg total proteins.
Figure 5:

Cytokine values in plasma samples (n=12) from whole blood after 3h of stimulation with increasing concentrations of living E. coli (106 and 108 CFU/mL) and LPS from E. coli (1 µg/mL). (Mixed-effects model followed by Dunnet’s multiple comparison test: ∗p=0.01–0.05; ∗∗p=0.001–0.01; comparisons were calculated among treatments and respective controls). Values are expressed as box and whiskers, showing min to max values, median and 25th to 75th percentiles of the pg/mg total proteins.

In detail, we highlighted that the levels of MIP-1α/CCL3 were significantly increased by all triggers (E. coli 106, 108 CFU/mL and LPS) compared with untreated controls, showing the strongest responses (fold of change vs. controls: E. coli 106 CFU/mL: 23.4-fold, p<0.05; E. coli 108 CFU/mL: 21.0-fold, p=0.001–0.01; LPS: 48.2-fold, p<0.05) (Figure 5).

The levels of IL-8/CXCL8 also showed a significant increase of about 9.1-fold (p<0.05), 17.0-fold (p=0.001–0.01), and 10.2-fold (p=0.001–0.01) after treatments with E. coli 106 CFU/mL, E. coli 108 CFU/mL, and LPS, respectively. Levels of TNF-α were significantly up-regulated from 5- to 10-fold vs. untreated controls, after living E. coli and LPS treatments (Figure 5).

G-CSF levels were significantly increased by about 2.9-fold (p<0.05), 3.9-fold (p=0.001–0.01), and 5.5-fold (p=0.001–0.01) after treatments with E. coli 106 and 108 CFU/mL, and LPS, respectively.

Plasma levels of IL-1β showed a significant increase of about 1.1-fold, 1.6-fold (p<0.05), and 1.8-fold after treatments with E. coli 106 CFU/mL, E. coli 108 CFU/mL, and LPS, respectively.

A minor significant up-regulation was observed for MIP-1β/CCL4 of 1.2-fold, 1.2-fold (p<0.05), and 1.7-fold after treatments with E. coli 106 CFU/mL, E. coli 108 CFU/mL, and LPS, respectively.

Finally, a significant decrease of Eotaxin/CCL11 was observed after E. coli 106 and 108 CFU/mL treatments (p=0.01–0.05); a significant down-regulation of PDGF-bb was also observed after E. coli 108 CFU/mL stimulation (p=0.01–0.05) (Figure 5). According to the 8-points standard curves and the Limit of Detection (LOD) of the assay IL-2, IL-15, and VEGF were removed from the analyses due to the limited number of samples with measurable levels of cytokines.

A complete overview of cytokine behavior, according also to age and gender differences is provided in Figure 6. The heat map shows the mean value (pg/mL) of each cytokine measured in untreated controls, E. coli 106 and 108 CFU/mL, and LPS treated samples, obtained both in the whole cohort of donors, and classified according to gender and age (cut-off 45 years).

Figure 6: 
The heat map represents the variations of cytokines, chemokines, growth factors and colony stimulating factors according to gender and age differences. On the left are indicated all the inflammatory parameters. The first group of columns (all) highlights the mean cytokine values obtained from the analyses of the entire population (n=12). The other groups of columns (gender and age) show the mean cytokine values obtained from the analyses of the population divided according to the gender (F, n=3; M, n=9) and the age (<45 years, n=7; >45 years, n=5). Cytokine concentrations (pg/mL) are depicted as colours ranging from magenta, blue, green, yellow, orange, red, brown, and grey, indicating increasing levels of concentration.
Figure 6:

The heat map represents the variations of cytokines, chemokines, growth factors and colony stimulating factors according to gender and age differences. On the left are indicated all the inflammatory parameters. The first group of columns (all) highlights the mean cytokine values obtained from the analyses of the entire population (n=12). The other groups of columns (gender and age) show the mean cytokine values obtained from the analyses of the population divided according to the gender (F, n=3; M, n=9) and the age (<45 years, n=7; >45 years, n=5). Cytokine concentrations (pg/mL) are depicted as colours ranging from magenta, blue, green, yellow, orange, red, brown, and grey, indicating increasing levels of concentration.

These findings suggest preliminary indications on potential age- and sex-related differences in cytokine-mediated immune responses associated with bacterial infection. Indeed, certain cytokines appeared to be differently modulated by the same trigger in subjects of different sexes (e.g., IL-8) and age ranges (e.g., MIP-1α, IL-8, and PDGFbb). Further experiments in a larger cohort of subjects are required to confirm this observation.

Discussion

The present study investigated the ability of live E. coli and its endotoxin LPS to promote monocyte morpho-functional alterations and the dynamic of various cytokines and chemokines produced by blood cells, and to evaluate how these could be reflected and quantified by MDW.

Firstly, a wide variety of anticoagulants have been described in literature to collect whole blood for exploring the effect of live or heat-killed bacteria on selected targets (e.g., to avoid the complement system inhibition [10] and to inhibit thrombin [24]). Importantly, according to the current guidelines for the measurement of MDW and multiplexing of cytokines, we collected whole blood samples with EDTA-K2 as anticoagulant [14], 25].

Noteworthy, EDTA by chelating the divalent cations Ca2+ and Mg2+ limits but not completely excludes any further activation of the complement system, which can still be achieved [26].

The bacterial load found in bloodstream infections ranges from 1 to 10 CFU/mL to 1 × 103 and 1 × 104 CFU/mL [27]. According to literature data, the E. coli doses used in our study were similar to those reported in other studies performed in whole blood models [7] with similar incubation times, reaching bacteria concentrations of up to 108 CFU/mL [7], 8], 12].

There are several investigations focused on the biochemical mechanisms adopted by Gram-negative bacteria during sepsis; however, to the best of our knowledge, none of them was oriented in determining the impact of live E. coli on MDW.

Only two studies screened MDW levels according to the pathogen involved in sepsis [18], 28], and a recent review [20] suggested that an increase in MDW values is not associated with specific type of microorganisms.

Herein, we highlighted that monocyte morpho-functional modifications induced by live E. coli could be measured and quantified by MDW and are directly associated with the bacterial load and incubation time, thus confirming the ability of MDW to early detect bacteria-activated monocytes [16], [17], [1828].

Our findings confirmed that MDW values are significantly higher in sepsis patients, compared to unaffected controls [14], 16], 17], 20], [29], [30], [31] and that MDW measurements obtained in our ex vivo model significantly overlap those measured in sepsis patients, thus sustaining the reliability of the ex vivo model.

In full agreement with our previous findings [21] and other published literature [32], we also underlined that in vitro treatment of whole blood with increasing concentrations of LPS and live E. coli induced MDW enhancement in a dose- and time-dependent manner, reaching overlapping levels.

In fact, LPS, the major component of the outer leaflet of the membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, is widely recognized as a prototypal signal for the activation of monocyte/macrophage inflammatory responses by inducing the upregulation and release of several inflammatory mediators and activating TLR-mediated signaling [8], [32], [33], [34], [35].

E. coli- and LPS-induced MDW changes were accompanied by morpho-functional alterations of monocytes, as confirmed by digital microscopy of MGG-stained blood smears. These findings are in agreement with the monocyte morphological alterations described in vivo, in both bacterial [36] and viral [37], 38] sepsis, as well as in ex vivo models of human whole blood stimulated with LPS and/or histones [21], 22], 32]. Monocyte morphological abnormalities, including increased cell size, vacuolization, intracellular hyper-granulation, nuclear deformations with chromatin de-condensation, and bacteria phagocytosis (only with live E. coli stimulation) are features representative of monocyte activation, despite that different pathways were evoked by LPS and live E. coli. The recognition of microbial PAMP can trigger phagocytosis, but opsonization of pathogens provides the best strategy to optimize microbial engulfment [39]. Monocyte vacuolization in LPS-triggered blood samples can be the result of a “priming” mechanism leading to monocyte morpho-functional activation toward a pro-inflammatory phenotype, without a “true phagocytosis” activation, due to the absence of microorganisms. In fact, previous studies established that LPS is able to promote the formation of vacuolar structures, but these structures are not of lysosomal or phagosomal origin [40].

On the other hand, we unexpectedly observed different inflammatory responses, in terms of both cytokine mediators and intensity of the inflammatory responses. Previous studies reported that in vitro stimulation of whole blood with E. coli was associated with a dose-dependent up-regulation of peculiar cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-2, IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-8, MIP-1α, IL-1ra, G-CSF and MIP-1β), whose expression was dependent on the activation of CD-14 and complement pathways, and on incubation temperature [7], 8], 12], 13], 41].

Herein, we observed a significant increase in several proinflammatory cytokines, including MIP-1α/CCL3, IL-8/CXCL8, TNF-α, IL-1β and a minor significant up-regulation was observed for MIP-1β/CCL4. Interestingly, we also observed an increased level of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 but only after treatment with the highest concentration of E. coli. This observation is in agreement with an earlier publication [42] on detailed analysis of gene expression in patient monocytes during sepsis and after recovery, which demonstrated plasticity of monocytes in the course of disease. Significant up-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6) and chemokines (MIP-1α/CCL3 and RANTES/CCL5) in sepsis monocytes compared with monocytes after recovery has been observed, but at the same time, anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 was found to be up-regulated in sepsis monocytes. Together with the previous publication [42], our in vitro results support the possible functional heterogeneity of monocytes in sepsis, which can result in morphological variability, detected by elevated MDW. Preliminary observations also suggest potential age- and gender-related immune responses, underlining that peculiar cytokines (e.g., MIP-1α, IL-8, and PDGFbb) could be sensitive to different ages and genders. Despite highlighted in a limited number of subjects, these findings provide possible hypotheses on how biological sex- and age-related factors could sustain different susceptibility to infective agents, immune responses, disease outcome and response to therapeutic strategies, providing novel evidence for a gender-based medicine [43].

In vitro treatment of whole blood with live bacteria better reflects the cellular and inflammatory responses elicited in vivo, since in vitro stimulation with LPS does not predict the degree and pattern of cytokine production as it occurs in vivo due to the cooperation with microenvironmental tissue-derived inflammatory mediators [44].

Previous studies have also described that cytokine release is achieved upon in vitro stimulation with heat-killed or antibiotic-killed bacteria, due to the liberation of LPS and other bacterial components [45], which stimulate the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines mainly by mononuclear cells [46].

Further differences in the levels and timing of cytokine release may rely on (I) the rapid live pathogen internalization by phagocytes vs. the long-lasting LPS effect; (II) the type of Lipid A moiety within the LPS structure and the length of the acyl chains [33]; (III) the relative position of the Lipid A moiety in LPS molecule when it is in its soluble or membrane-bound form [47].

Despite our results obtained in an ex vivo whole blood model cannot fully represent the complexity of multicellular and humoral responses attainable in vivo, our present findings further support and confirm the clinical utility of MDW in early sepsis diagnosis and the reliability of the whole blood assay as ex vivo sepsis model. Moreover, we reveal that monocyte morphological alterations, as assessed by digital microscopy and quantified by MDW variations, could be induced not only by live bacteria through the activation of phagocytic mechanisms, but also by pro-inflammatory pathways associated with the release of bacterial endotoxins. Ongoing investigations are focused on the possible species-specific bacteria modifications of MDW according to the microorganisms and strains and also with the associated PAMPs.

MDW is a low cost and rapid-to-obtain biomarker available as part of the routine CBC. It has a high negative predictive value [19], and a high accuracy in excluding sepsis diagnosis when MDW values are below the decisional cut-off [48].

Finally, our results support and strengthen the use of MDW as an early screening tool for the recognition of sepsis conditions of bacterial origin in a timely manner, which can represent the greatest and crucial challenge in critical sepsis clinical and laboratory managements.


Corresponding author: Daniela Ligi, PhD, Department of Biomolecular Sciences – DISB, Laboratories of Clinical Biochemistry, Section of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Via Ca’ Le Suore, 2, 61029, Urbino, PU, Italy, E-mail:
Daniela Ligi and Chiara Della Franca contributed equally to this work and share first authorship. Giuditta F. Schiavano and Ferdinando Mannello share senior authorship.

Funding source: Beckman Coulter SpA

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all healthy blood donor volunteers and the Transfusion Center of the Hospital of Urbino for providing us the blood samples and minimal subject information. We also thank all the sepsis patients and subjects who participated in this research, the emergency department clinicians and the laboratory technicians of all participating sites for their valuable efforts.

  1. Research ethics: The non-interventional ex vivo study was approved by the local Ethical Committee based on an official document of accordance between the University of Urbino Carlo Bo and the Blood Transfusion Center of “S. Maria della Misericordia” Hospital of Urbino – Italy. The retrospective study included data obtained from previous in vivo studies reviewed and approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain (PI-18-249 and PI-18-140). All patients included in these studies signed an informed consent previously approved by the CEIC (Ethics Committee for Clinical Investigation).

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the studies.

  3. Author contributions: Conceptualization: Ligi D, Della Franca C, and Mannello F. Methodology: Ligi D, Della Franca C, Pelloso M, Martinez-Iribarren A, Leis A, Fabbri E, Salvatori F, Schiavano GF. Investigation: Ligi D, Della Franca C, Pelloso M, Martinez-Iribarren A, Leis A, Fabbri E, Salvatori F, Schiavano GF, Brandi G. Visualization: Ligi D, Della Franca C, and Mannello F. Funding acquisition: Mannello F. Project administration: Ligi D, and Mannello F. Supervision: Ligi D, Sukhacheva EA, and Mannello F. Writing – original draft: Ligi D, Schiavano GF, Brandi G, and Mannello F. Writing – review & editing: Ligi D, Della Franca C, Sukhacheva EA and Mannello F. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its final submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: F. M. discloses research support from Beckman Coulter SpA. E.S. is currently a full-time employee of Beckman Coulter Eurocenter. All other authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: Beckman Coulter SpA supported this study. The support of Beckman Coulter SpA had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

  7. Data availability: The dataset used in this paper is not publicly available since it is still under elaboration for publication by the Authors but is available from the corresponding author Daniela Ligi () upon reasonable request.

References

1. Singer, M, Deutschman, CS, Seymour, CW, Shankar-Hari, M, Annane, D, Bauer, M, et al.. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:801–10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Dolin, HH, Papadimos, TJ, Chen, X, Pan, ZK. Characterization of pathogenic sepsis etiologies and patient profiles: a novel approach to triage and treatment. Microbiol Insights 2019;12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1178636118825081.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Dickson, K, Lehmann, C. Inflammatory response to different toxins in experimental sepsis models. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20184341.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Ince, C. The microcirculation is the motor of sepsis. Crit Care 2005;9:S13. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc3753.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Wiersinga, WJ, van der Poll, T. Immunopathophysiology of human sepsis. EBioMedicine 2022;86:104363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104363.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. van der Poll, T, Shankar-Hari, M, Wiersinga, WJ. The immunology of sepsis. Immunity 2021;54:2450–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2021.10.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Egge, KH, Barratt-Due, A, Nymo, S, Lindstad, JK, Pharo, A, Lau, C, et al.. The anti-inflammatory effect of combined complement and CD14 inhibition is preserved during escalating bacterial load. Clin Exp Immunol 2015;181:457–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.12645.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Barratt-Due, A, Thorgersen, EB, Lindstad, JK, Pharo, A, Brekke, OL, Christiansen, D, et al.. Selective inhibition of TNF-alpha or IL-1 beta does not affect E. coli-induced inflammation in human whole blood. Mol Immunol 2010;47:1774–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2010.02.026.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Baronetti, JL, Villegas, NA, Aiassa, V, Paraje, MG, Albesa, I. Hemolysin from Escherichia coli induces oxidative stress in blood. Toxicon 2013;70:15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2013.03.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Alharbi, A, Thompson, JP, Brindle, NP, Stover, CM. Ex vivo modelling of the formation of inflammatory platelet-leucocyte aggregates and their adhesion on endothelial cells, an early event in sepsis. Clin Exp Med 2019;19:321–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-018-0526-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Brekke, OL, Hellerud, BC, Christiansen, D, Fure, H, Castellheim, A, Nielsen, EW, et al.. Neisseria meningitidis and Escherichia coli are protected from leukocyte phagocytosis by binding to erythrocyte complement receptor 1 in human blood. Mol Immunol 2011;48:2159–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2011.07.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Brekke, OL, Christiansen, D, Fure, H, Pharo, A, Fung, M, Riesenfeld, J, et al.. Combined inhibition of complement and CD14 abolish E. coli-induced cytokine-chemokine- and growth factor-synthesis in human whole blood. Mol Immunol 2008;45:3804–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2008.05.017.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Chaban, V, de Boer, E, McAdam, KE, Vaage, J, Mollnes, TE, Nilsson, PH, et al.. Escherichia coli-induced inflammatory responses are temperature-dependent in human whole blood ex vivo. Mol Immunol 2023;157:70–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2023.03.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Malinovska, A, Hernried, B, Lin, A, Badaki-Makun, O, Fenstermacher, K, Ervin, AM, et al.. Monocyte distribution width as a diagnostic marker for infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest 2023;164:101–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2022.12.049.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Alsuwaidi, L, Al Heialy, S, Shaikh, N, Al Najjar, F, Seliem, R, Han, A, et al.. Monocyte distribution width as a novel sepsis indicator in COVID-19 patients. BMC Infect Dis 2022;22:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-07016-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Crouser, ED, Parrillo, JE, Martin, GS, Huang, DT, Hausfater, P, Grigorov, I, et al.. Monocyte distribution width enhances early sepsis detection in the emergency department beyond SIRS and qSOFA. J Intensive Care 2020;8:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-00446-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Crouser, ED, Parrillo, JE, Seymour, C, Angus, DC, Bicking, K, Tejidor, L, et al.. Improved early detection of sepsis in the ED with a novel monocyte distribution width biomarker. Chest 2017;152:518–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.039.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Jo, SJ, Kim, SW, Choi, J-H, Choi, SP, Lee, J, Lim, J. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a useful indicator for early screening of sepsis and discriminating false positive blood cultures. PLoS One 2022;17:e0279374. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279374.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Li, CH, Seak, CJ, Chaou, CH, Su, TH, Gao, SY, Chien, CY, et al.. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of monocyte distribution width and procalcitonin in sepsis cases in the emergency department: a prospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis 2022;22:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06999-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Agnello, L, Ciaccio, AM, Vidali, M, Cortegiani, A, Biundo, G, Gambino, CM, et al.. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) in sepsis. Clin Chim Acta 2023;548:117511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2023.117511.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Ligi, D, Lo Sasso, B, Giglio, RV, Maniscalco, R, DellaFranca, C, Agnello, L, et al.. Circulating histones contribute to monocyte and MDW alterations as common mediators in classical and COVID-19 sepsis. Crit Care 2022;26:260. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04138-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Ligi, D, Lo Sasso, B, Della Franca, C, Giglio, RV, Agnello, L, Ciaccio, M, et al.. Monocyte distribution width alterations and cytokine storm are modulated by circulating histones. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023;61:1525–35. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0093.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Ligi, D, Della Franca, C, Mannello, F. Novel mechanisms of thrombo-inflammation during infection: the harmful impact of circulating histones. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2023;7:100141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2023.100141.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Johnson, C, Quach, HQ, Lau, C, Ekholt, K, Espevik, T, Woodruff, TM, et al.. Thrombin differentially modulates the acute inflammatory response to Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus in human whole blood. J Immunol 2022;208:2771–8. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.2101033.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Hennø, LT, Storjord, E, Christiansen, D, Bergseth, G, Ludviksen, JK, Fure, H, et al.. Effect of the anticoagulant, storage time and temperature of blood samples on the concentrations of 27 multiplex assayed cytokines – consequences for defining reference values in healthy humans. Cytokine 2017;97:86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2017.05.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Brandwijk, R, Michels, M, van Rossum, M, de Nooijer, AH, Nilsson, PH, de Bruin, WCC, et al.. Pitfalls in complement analysis: a systematic literature review of assessing complement activation. Front Immunol 2022;13:1007102. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.1007102.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Opota, O, Croxatto, A, Prod’hom, G, Greub, G. Blood culture-based diagnosis of bacteraemia: state of the art. Clin Microbiol Infect 2015;21:313–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2015.01.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Piva, E, Zuin, J, Pelloso, M, Tosato, F, Fogar, P, Plebani, M. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) parameter as a sepsis indicator in intensive care units. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021;59:1307–14. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-0192.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Ciaccio, AM, Agnello, L, Sasso, BL, Giglio, RV, Iacona, A, Gambino, CM, et al.. Monocyte Distribution Width (MDW) as a biomarker of sepsis: an evidenced-based laboratory medicine approach. Clin Chim Acta 2023;540:117214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2022.117214.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Agnello, L, Vidali, M, Lo Sasso, B, Giglio, RV, Gambino, CM, Scazzone, C, et al.. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a screening tool for early detecting sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022;60:786–92. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-1331.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Agnello, L, Bivona, G, Vidali, M, Scazzone, C, Giglio, RV, Iacolino, G, et al.. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a screening tool for sepsis in the emergency department. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:1951–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-0417.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Eisinger, GJ, Osman, W, Prather, ER, Julian, MW, Gavrilin, MA, Crouser, ED, et al.. Inflammasome activation in an in vitro sepsis model recapitulates increased monocyte distribution width seen in patients with sepsis. Crit Care Explor 2022;4:e0631. https://doi.org/10.1097/cce.0000000000000631.Search in Google Scholar

33. Mazgaeen, L, Gurung, P. Recent advances in lipopolysaccharide recognition systems. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020379.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

34. Damsgaard, CT, Lauritzen, L, Calder, PC, Kjaer, TM, Frøkiaer, H. Whole-blood culture is a valid low-cost method to measure monocytic cytokines – a comparison of cytokine production in cultures of human whole-blood, mononuclear cells and monocytes. J Immunol Methods 2009;340:95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2008.10.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Brekke, OL, Christiansen, D, Fure, H, Fung, M, Mollnes, TE. The role of complement C3 opsonization, C5a receptor, and CD14 in E. coli-induced up-regulation of granulocyte and monocyte CD11b/CD18 (CR3), phagocytosis, and oxidative burst in human whole blood. J Leukoc Biol 2007;81:1404–13. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.0806538.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Rezende, D, Salgado, V, Ramos, MC, Fock, RA. Sepsis in newborn: phagocytosis by peripheral blood neutrophils and monocytes. Int J Hematol 2015;102:389–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-015-1864-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Zini, G, Bellesi, S, Ramundo, F, d’Onofrio, G. Morphological anomalies of circulating blood cells in COVID-19. Am J Hematol 2020;95:870–2. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.25824.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

38. Pozdnyakova, O, Connell, NT, Battinelli, EM, Connors, JM, Fell, G, Kim, AS. Clinical significance of CBC and WBC morphology in the diagnosis and clinical course of COVID-19 infection. Am J Clin Pathol 2020;155:364–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaa231.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

39. Lim, JJ, Grinstein, S, Roth, Z. Diversity and versatility of phagocytosis: roles in innate immunity, tissue remodeling, and homeostasis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2017;7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00191.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

40. Yoshida, K, Ono, M, Sawada, H. Lipopolysaccharide-induced vacuoles in macrophages: their origin is plasma membrane-derived organelles and endoplasmic reticulum, but not lysosomes. J Endotoxin Res 1999;5:127–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/09680519990050030601.Search in Google Scholar

41. Egge, KH, Thorgersen, EB, Lindstad, JK, Pharo, A, Lambris, JD, Barratt-Due, A, et al.. Post challenge inhibition of C3 and CD14 attenuates Escherichia coli-induced inflammation in human whole blood. Innate Immun 2014;20:68–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753425913482993.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

42. Shalova, IN, Lim, JY, Chittezhath, M, Zinkernagel, AS, Beasley, F, Hernández-Jiménez, E, et al.. Human monocytes undergo functional re-programming during sepsis mediated by hypoxia-inducible factor-1α. Immunity 2015;42:484–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2015.02.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Rio, P, Caldarelli, M, Miccoli, E, Guazzarotti, G, Gasbarrini, A, Gambassi, G, et al.. Sex differences in immune responses to infectious diseases: the role of genetics, hormones, and aging. Diseases 2025;13:179. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13060179.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

44. Dorresteijn, MJ, Draisma, A, van der Hoeven, JG, Pickkers, P. Lipopolysaccharide-stimulated whole blood cytokine production does not predict the inflammatory response in human endotoxemia. Innate Immun 2010;16:248–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753425909339923.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

45. Frieling, JT, Mulder, JA, Hendriks, T, Curfs, JH, van der Linden, CJ, Sauerwein, RW. Differential induction of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in whole blood by bacteria: effects of antibiotic treatment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997;41:1439–43. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.41.7.1439.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

46. Mukhopadhyay, S, Herre, J, Brown, GD, Gordon, S. The potential for Toll-like receptors to collaborate with other innate immune receptors. Immunology 2004;112:521–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2567.2004.01941.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

47. Gorman, A, Golovanov, AP. Lipopolysaccharide structure and the phenomenon of low endotoxin recovery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2022;180:289–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2022.10.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

48. Huang, YH, Chen, CJ, Shao, SC, Li, CH, Hsiao, CH, Niu, KY, et al.. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracies of monocyte distribution width, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein for sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 2023;51:e106–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000005820.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-04-22
Accepted: 2025-08-26
Published Online: 2025-09-18
Published in Print: 2026-01-27

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Keeping pace with patient safety by developing and qualifying higher-order reference measurement procedures for laboratory measurement standardization
  4. Review
  5. The role of AI in pre-analytical phase – use cases
  6. Opinion Paper
  7. Total laboratory automation: fit for its intended purposes?
  8. Guidelines and Recommendations
  9. EFLM checklist for the assessment of AI/ML studies in laboratory medicine: enhancing general medical AI frameworks for laboratory-specific applications
  10. Candidate Reference Measurement Procedures and Materials
  11. An isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based candidate reference measurement procedure for the quantification of cortisol in human serum and plasma
  12. Isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based candidate reference measurement procedures for the quantification of 24(R),25-dihydroxyvitamin D2 and 24(R),25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in human serum and plasma
  13. An isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based candidate reference measurement procedure for the quantification of cortisone in human serum and plasma
  14. Candidate reference measurement procedure based on isotope dilution-two dimensional-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the quantification of androstenedione in human serum and plasma
  15. An isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based candidate reference measurement procedure for the quantification of 17β-estradiol in human serum and plasma
  16. Isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based candidate reference measurement procedures for the quantification of total and free phenytoin in human serum and plasma
  17. An isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry based candidate reference measurement procedure for the simultaneous quantification of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 in human serum and plasma
  18. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  19. Quality assurance using patient split samples: recommendations for primary healthcare laboratories
  20. Age distorts the interpretation of FIB-4
  21. Not all anti-parietal cell antibody tests are equal for diagnosing pernicious anemia
  22. Impact of renal and hepatic function on dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase phenotype assessed by enzyme activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and uracilemia
  23. Fecal leukocyte esterase levels predict endoscopic severity as an alternative biomarker in inflammatory bowel disease
  24. Cancer Diagnostics
  25. CA-125 glycovariant assays enhance diagnostic sensitivity in the detection of epithelial ovarian cancer
  26. Cardiovascular Diseases
  27. Defining the analytical characteristics of a novel high-sensitivity point-of-care troponin I assay in its intended clinical environment
  28. An automatic chemiluminescence immunoassay for a novel biomarker NT-IGFBP-4: analytical performance and clinical relevance in heart failure
  29. Analysis of total cholesterol results measured in the initial period of the Croatian screening program for familial hypercholesterolemia: a pilot study
  30. Diabetes
  31. Comparison of seven different enzymatic methods for serum glycated albumin in pregnant women: a multicenter study
  32. Infectious Diseases
  33. Comparative analysis of monocyte distribution width alterations in Escherichia coli sepsis: insights from in vivo and ex vivo models
  34. Proadrenomedullin for prediction of early and mid-term mortality in patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia
  35. Annual Reviewer Acknowledgment
  36. Reviewer Acknowledgment
  37. Letters to the Editor
  38. Biological variation of serum Golgi protein 73 concentrations
  39. Are vitamins A and E results truly traceable and clinically useful? A practical and critical inquiry
  40. Tafasitamab interference in immunofixation electrophoresis
  41. Improvement in the turnaround time of PTH(1–84) as part of the intraoperative PTH monitoring for parathyroidectomy
  42. Rethinking the use of “one-way ANOVA” in CLSI EP15-A3 – a call for terminological precision and methodological clarity
  43. Toxic beauty: acute kidney injury triggered by hair-straightening treatment
  44. Congress Abstracts
  45. 57th National Congress of the Italian Society of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (SIBioC – Laboratory Medicine)
Downloaded on 15.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2025-0487/html
Scroll to top button