EN ISO 15189 revision: EFLM Committee Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (C: A/ISO) analysis and general remarks on the changes
-
Solveig Linko
, Guilaine Boursier
, Francisco A. Bernabeu-Andreu , Nana Dzneladze , Florent Vanstapel , Pika Meško Brguljan , Katerina Tosheska-Trajkovska , Hélène Mehay , Mauro Panteghini , Duilio Brugnoni , Neda Milinkovic , Maria Lohmander , Luděk Šprongl , Hikmet Can Çubukçu und Marc Thelen
Abstract
The EN ISO 15189:2022 standard, titled “Medical laboratories – Requirements for quality and competence,” is a significant update to the regulations for medical laboratories. The revised standard was published on December 6, 2022, replacing both EN ISO 15189:2012 and EN ISO 22870:2016. Key objectives of the revision include: 1. Alignment with ISO/IEC 17025:2017, 2. Removal of unintended prescription, 3. Focus on patient interest and safety, 4. Minimization of new requirements, and 5. Improved clarity of text. Dedicating to harmonizing accreditation processes across Europe the EFLM Committee on Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (C: A/ISO) has produced this guidance document to assist the laboratory medicine community in understanding and implementing the criteria of the EN ISO 15189 revision. Two main objectives of the guidance in educating both laboratories and accreditation bodies with their assessors as well as other stakeholders in laboratory medicine were agreed on. Firstly, to clarify the relevant changes covering all paragraphs of the standard and secondly to make an impact analysis on previous C: A/ISO guidance documents.
Background of the EN ISO 15189:2022 revision
The EN ISO 15189:2022, titled “Medical laboratories – Requirements for quality and competence,” represents a significant update to the standards governing medical laboratories [1]. This document was developed by the Technical Committee ISO/TC 212, which focuses on clinical laboratory testing and in vitro diagnostic test systems, in partnership with the European Committee for Standardization (CEN), specifically the CEN/TC 140 that addresses in vitro diagnostic medical devices. The updated standard was approved and published on December 6, 2022, effectively replacing both EN ISO 15189:2012 [2] and EN ISO 22870:2016 [3]. The latter was dedicated to point-of-care testing (POCT).
Objectives of the ISO/TC 212 WG drafting team
The revision was driven by several key objectives established by the drafting team:
Alignment with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 [4]:
The revised EN ISO 15189:2022 was updated to ensure consistency and coherence with the revisions made to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 which pertains to testing and calibration laboratories.
Removal of unintended prescription:
The team aimed to eliminate any unintended prescriptive elements from the previous version that may have caused confusion or misinterpretation, thus providing greater flexibility in implementation.
Focus on patient interest and safety:
The revised document introduces the concept of “risk-based thinking”, emphasizing the importance of patient welfare in laboratory decision-making processes.
It clarifies the difference between risk assessment (quantifying risk by considering both the opportunity and the potential impact) and risk management (implementing strategies to address identified risks).
Minimization of new requirements:
The drafting team sought to limit the introduction of new requirements to avoid overwhelming laboratories while still addressing critical areas for quality and competence.
Improved clarity of text:
The team focused on refining the language and structure of the standard to improve its interpretability and applicability, with the goal of providing for clearer guidance for laboratories.
The ISO/TC 212 drafting team acknowledged several concerns raised during the review process:
Perception of new requirements:
Some stakeholders, particularly from National Accreditation Bodies (NABs), perceived that any differences in text would signal new requirements, suggesting intentions which were no objective of the drafting team. The intent was to clarify existing requirements rather than introduce new ones, addressing previous misconceptions and unintentional prescriptions.
Risk-based thinking misinterpretation:
There was concern that references to risk-based thinking could be misread as necessitating specific risk assessment protocols. The true aim is to facilitate decision-making in the patient’s best interest rather than impose mathematical calculations.
The standard provides practical examples to illustrate risk-based thinking. For instance, when handling a compromised clinically critical or irreplaceable sample, the focus should be on the patient’s safety. Accepting such a sample may depend on its potential value vs. the availability of a better sample. This illustrates the principle of making informed, patient-centred decisions based on risk assessment rather than rigid adherence to predefined criteria.
Objectives of the EFLM Committee on Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards in terms of EN ISO 15189:2022 revision
According to the terms of reference for the Committee on Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards, the Committee (C: A/ISO) is dedicated to harmonizing accreditation processes across Europe. The C: A/ISO produces comprehensive guidance documents aimed at assisting laboratories in understanding and implementing accreditation standards. These documents are designed to facilitate the translation of complex standards into practical applications for laboratory settings and help educate specialists in laboratory medicine and assessors from accrediting bodies on the application of specific professional standards outlined in EN ISO 15189:2022, ensuring that all stakeholders are equipped with the knowledge to adhere to the standards effectively.
In May 2023, the C: A/ISO agreed on two main objectives to enhance the understanding and implementation of the revised standard:
Clarification of relevant changes:
The C: A/ISO committed to explaining and clarifying the most significant changes introduced in the EN ISO 15189:2022 revision. By doing so, they aim to promote effective implementation of the new requirements within medical laboratories.
Impact analysis on previous C: A/ISO guidance documents:
The C: A/ISO also recognized the need to analyse how the recent revisions affect previous guidance documents. This analysis helps ensure that the updated standards are appropriately reflected in existing practices and guidance.
This document has been prepared with a specific target audience in mind:
Medical laboratory professionals:
The guidance is aimed at laboratory staff who need to understand the revised (formulations of the) requirements and how to apply them effectively in their day-to-day operations.
NABs:
The document provides insights for assessors of accreditation bodies, helping them to align their assessment processes with the updated standard.
Stakeholders in medical laboratory testing:
It serves as a resource ensuring that they are informed about the changes and their implications for laboratory practices.
General remarks on changes from EN ISO 15189:2012 to EN ISO 15189:2022
The members of the C: A/ISO have reached a consensus on several important changes and emphases in the transition from EN ISO 15189:2012 to EN ISO 15189:2022. These remarks outline the key modifications and the reasoning behind them:
Alignment with ISO/IEC 17025:2017:
The structure of EN ISO 15189:2022 has been aligned with the revised ISO/IEC 17025:2017 to enhance coherence and consistency across laboratory standards.
Inclusion of support of POCT as previously described in the now withdrawn EN ISO 22870:2016:
The inclusion of POCT in the standard is supported by the reasoning that POCT plays a crucial role in delivering timely patient care, necessitating clear guidelines and standards for its implementation. Previously EN ISO 22870:2016 formulated requirements for EN ISO 15189:2012 accredited medical laboratories on how to support POCT operated by staff outside the responsibility of their laboratory staff. The inclusion of those requirements in the current EN ISO 15189:2022 has led to the withdrawal of the now obsolete EN ISO 22870:2016. Guidance for operators of POCT is still available in ISO/TS 22583:2024, entitled Requirements and recommendations for supervisors and operators of POCT equipment [5]. That document refers such user to EN ISO 15189:2022 accredited medical laboratory for adequate support of POCT implementation and use.
Surveillance and revision of terms and definitions:
The revision emphasizes the need for continuous surveillance and periodic revision of terms and definitions to ensure clarity and relevance in the evolving landscape of medical laboratory practices.
Autonomy in implementation:
Laboratories are allowed more autonomy in the implementation of the standard, empowering them to tailor processes according to specific needs of their population served, while still adhering to overarching quality requirements.
New perspectives in key clauses:
The revision introduces fresh perspectives in various clauses:
Clause 4.1 (Impartiality) emphasizes the importance of unbiased practices.
Clause 7.7 (Complaints) focuses on effective handling and resolution of complaints.
Clause 7.8 (Continuity and emergency preparedness planning) addresses the necessity for contingency plans and continuity of services.
Clause 8.5 (Risk management and opportunities for improvement) stresses the importance of proactive identification and management of risks, as well as fostering opportunities for continuous improvement.
The reporting of results has been simplified to improve clarity and usability (Section 7.4.1).
Strategic and risk-based approach:
There is an increased emphasis on adopting a strategic and risk-based approach to laboratory management, ensuring that patient safety and interests are at the forefront of decision-making processes.
Patient-centric orientation:
The revision improves orientation towards patient interests, highlighting the necessity of prioritizing patient care in laboratory operations.
Clarification of requirements:
The revision makes clear distinctions between “shalls,” “shoulds,” and “coulds,” providing guidance on mandatory vs. recommended practices.
New examples are included to illustrate concepts without introducing new requirements; rather, these are framed as clarified interpretations of existing standards.
Only where considered necessary to prevent misconception the standard now contains some educational explanation. An example is the explanation of the impact of (the lack of) commutability in clause 7.3 (Examination processes) with regard to quality control.
Integration with related documents:
EN ISO 15189:2022 is positioned as part of a suite of documents, with a focus on avoiding duplication of details covered in supporting standards, including:
ISO 22367:2020 Medical laboratories – Application of risk management to medical laboratories [6].
ISO 15190:2020 Medical laboratories – Requirements for safety [7].
ISO 35001:2019 Biorisk management for laboratories and other related organizations [8].
ISO/TS 20914:2019 Medical laboratories - Practical guide for measurement of uncertainty [9].
ISO 20658:2023 Medical laboratories – Requirements for the collection and transport of samples for medical laboratory examinations [10].
Closing remarks
Whether a laboratory judges the changes in the standard as major or not, may also depend on the degree to which the particular laboratory already complied to the new standard before its publication. This is very well possible because laboratories base their procedures not solely on requirements in standards, but in the first place on what they deem right in the interest of their community served. This was already the intent of EN ISO 15189:2012. With this in mind the detailed analysis of changes as documented in Annex 1 should be read.
|
EN ISO 15189:2022
4 General requirements |
|
4.1 Impartiality
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.1.1.3 Enhanced requirements: Impartiality is a mandatory requirement, not merely a matter of having “arrangements in place … to ensure the laboratory’s impartiality.” This includes addressing and mitigating any threats to impartiality. The results should only be influenced by the goal of obtaining technically valid outcomes. The standard does not permit any commercial, financial, or other pressures that could compromise this impartiality. A risk analysis must be carried out to ensure the laboratory’s impartiality. Both the 2012 and 2022 standards require the identification and declaration of potential influences that could undermine confidence in impartiality. These influences must be mitigated to prevent their impact. |
|
4.2 Confidentiality
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.1.1.3 – 5.10.1 – 5.4.2 Enhanced requirements: This includes transparency towards patients when information is made publicly available. No patient information can be shared in the public domain without first informing the patient in advance. Confidentiality must be preserved, and contracts must be signed before any personal information is communicated. Standard versions 2012 and 2022: The 2022 standard expands on the confidentiality requirements outlined in the 2012 standard (2012:4.1.1.3.e). This expansion aligns with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) [11]. According to 2022:4.2.3, these requirements extend to all external personnel who may have access to confidential information. In this section, the 2022 standard does not explicitly require that laboratories have legally enforceable contracts with such external parties beforehand. However, in many jurisdictions, general legislation already mandates these obligations for auxiliary staff. |
|
4.3 Requirements regarding patients EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.1.1.3 – 4.1.2.2 – 4.4.1 – 4.14.2 – 5.4.2 – 5.4.3 – 5.4.6 – 5.4.7 –5.7.2 – 5.9.1 New clause: There is now a more detailed focus on patient well-being, safety, rights, needs, and effective communication. While the requirements for these processes are not entirely new, they have been restructured into a dedicated chapter. A new requirement addresses the ongoing availability and integrity of retained patient samples and records, particularly in cases of laboratory closure, acquisition, or merger. Standard version 2012: Section 4.1.2.2 requires that interpretative and advisory services meet the needs of patients. Standard version 2022: Sections 4.3 and 5.3.3 expand on this, emphasizing two-way communication between the patient and the lab. The 2022 standard consolidates elements that were previously scattered across multiple sections in the 2012 version, such as regular reviews of the suitability of examination methods and ethical practices. This includes informed consent, non-discrimination, and the availability of information. In many jurisdictions, these ethical elements are also mandated by patient rights legislation. |
| 5 Structural and governance requirements |
|
5.1 Legal entity
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.1.1.2 The standard refers to an entity that can be held legally responsible for its activities, just as in the previous version. The 2022 version explicitly extends this responsibility to government laboratories, allowing the standard to be applied even in jurisdictions where sovereign immunity might otherwise protect such institutions from lawsuits by citizens. However, this situation typically does not apply in most European jurisdictions. |
|
5.2 Laboratory director
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.1.1.4 There are no significant changes, but the new version is less prescriptive and shorter regarding explicit task listings. It allows for different organizational structures and delegation of tasks while maintaining the director’s ultimate responsibility for risk management and the implementation of the quality system. Additionally, a designated quality manager is no longer required. |
|
5.3 Laboratory activities
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.1.1.1 – 4.1.2.2 – 4.1.2.3 – 4.2.2.2 – 4.7 Description of activities and conformity The revised 2022 introduces a new clause that mandates medical laboratories to provide a comprehensive description of all activities related to their operations. This includes various aspects of laboratory services, specifically:
|
|
5.4 Structure and authority
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.1.2.5 – 4.1.2.6 4.1.2.7 – – 4.2.2.1 – 4.2.2.2 There are no essential changes. The new version is less prescriptive, removing the requirement to appoint a quality manager, designate persons responsible for each laboratory function, and assign deputies for key managerial and technical personnel. |
|
5.5 Objectives and policies
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.1.2.2 – 4.1.2.3 – 4.1.2.4 – 4.14.7 The objectives are focused on meeting the needs of patients and users, as well as ensuring good professional practice to confirm that the services fulfil their intended use. These objectives must be defined in measurable terms. |
|
5.6 Risk management
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.2.1 – 4.11 – 4.16.6 Enhanced requirements: There is an emphasis on a risk-based approach to identifying potential harm to patients and opportunities to improve patient care, as outlined in Sections 7.1, 8.5, and 8.6.1. The focus should be on risks that are likely to affect the outcome of laboratory activities, particularly those that may impact the validity of results and lead to diagnostic errors or improper treatment, thereby posing a risk to patients. This includes risks arising from incidents within the laboratory that can be identified in its examinations, activities, or overall operation. Opportunities for improvement should be prioritized based on the identified risks. Actions should then be developed to address these risks and opportunities. |
| 6 Resource requirements |
|
6.1 General
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.1.1.4 – 4.1.2.1 There are no essential changes. |
|
6.2 Personnel
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.1.1.3 – 4.1.1.4 – 4.1.2.1 – 4.1.2.7 – 5.1.1 – 5.1.2 – 5.1.3 – 5.1.4 – 5.1.5 – 5.1.6 – 5.1.8 – 5.1.9 The new version features less prescriptive requirements and introduces the concept of authorization for certain specific activities. The term “authorized person” is used in various contexts throughout the document. Additionally, a process for establishing competency requirements is necessary. |
|
6.3 Facilities and environmental conditions
EN ISO 15189:2012: 5.2.1 – 5.2.2 – 5.2.3 – 5.2.4 – 5.2.5 – 5.2.6 The 2022 standard specifies that medical laboratories must conduct periodic reviews of their facilities and environmental conditions to ensure they meet the necessary standards for quality and safety. |
|
6.4 Equipment
EN ISO 15189:2012: 5.3.1.1 – 5.3.1.2 – 5.3.1.3 – 5.3.1.4 – 5.3.1.5 – 5.3.1.6 – 5.3.1.7 There are no essential changes. |
|
6.5 Equipment calibration and metrological traceability
EN ISO 15189:2012: 5.3.1.4 – 5.3.1.5 The chapter has been expanded to provide more details, making a clear distinction between equipment calibration and the traceability of results. It introduces requirements for qualitative methods and genetic examinations, ensuring traceability to genetic reference sequences. Additionally, it now links to the new 2020/2021 version of ISO 17511 as an informative reference on metrological traceability [12]. This includes acknowledgment that scenarios exist where a higher-order reference procedure or material to assure traceability to SI (International System of Units) may be lacking, providing further information on managing metrological traceability of laboratory measurands. Compared to the 2012 standard (Section 5.3.1.4), the 2022 standard (Sections 6.5.2 and 6.5.3) is more explicit about traceability requirements, placing greater emphasis on the responsibility of IVD (In-Vitro Diagnostic) manufacturers and making explicit references to applicable standards. |
|
6.6 Reagents and consumables
EN ISO 15189:2012: 5.3.2.1 – 5.3.2.2 – 5.3.2.3 – 5.3.2.4 – 5.3.2.5 – 5.3.2.6 – 5.3.2.7 Adverse incidents and accidents that can be attributed directly to specific equipment shall be investigated and reported. |
|
6.7 Service agreements
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.4.1 – 4.4.2 Agreements and contracts with laboratory users and POCT operators are required in relation to Annex A. Processes and contracts concerning resources and the laboratory’s capacity to perform activities are also required. While a clinical governance structure for POCT is no longer mandatory, the requirement for fitness for users remains in place. |
|
6.8 Externally provided products and services
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.5.1 – 4.5.2 – 4.6 Referral laboratories and consultants are now included as external providers. There is a requirement to evaluate the performance of external providers and to assess the qualifications and skills necessary for their roles. |
| 7 Process requirements |
|
7.1 General
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.2.1 – 4.11 – 4.14.6 New clause (see 5.5): There is an emphasis on a risk-based approach in the processes for identifying risks of harm to patients and communicating any residual risk to users when necessary. Identified risks and the effectiveness of mitigation processes must be monitored and evaluated based on the potential harm to patients. Additionally, the laboratory must identify opportunities to improve patient care and develop a framework to manage these opportunities. |
|
7.2 Pre-examination processes
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.4.1 – 5.4.1 – 5.4.2 –5.4.3 – 5.4.4.1 – 5.4.4.2 – 5.4.4.3 – 5.4.5 – 5.4.6 – 5.4.7 General overview: Sections 2022: 7.2.2 and 2012: 5.4.2 largely cover the same elements regarding the laboratory’s guidance to users. However, the 2022 version (under section c) is less explicit than the 2012 version (under section d). These elements are detailed in the report (2022: 7.4.1.6). The requirements are now less prescriptive and more goal-oriented, such as requests made by users. Laboratory Information for patients and users: The 2022 document provides more detailed and extensive information about various aspects of laboratory services and procedures. Since ISO 20658 has been introduced after the publication of the 2012 version of ISO 15189, the current version addresses important aspects of this standard on sample collection. Requests for laboratory examinations: The 2022 document offers a more generalized framework, emphasizing oral requests and flexibility in format. Risk assessment: The risks and impact on patient outcomes associated with any deviation in the collection process must be determined (7.2.4.1). Information for pre-collection activities: The 2022 document (7.2.4.2) provides detailed instructions for pre-collection activities, including:
Sample collection and handling: The 2022 document (7.2.4.4) explicitly mentions providing instructions on the order of sample collection when relevant. It also includes requirements for separating or aliquoting the primary sample when necessary. The risks and impact on patient outcomes associated with any deviation in the collection process must be determined (7.2.4.1). Sample transportation: The 2022 document (7.2.5c) explicitly states that the laboratory must establish and periodically evaluate the adequacy of sample transportation systems. Sample receipt: The 2022 document (7.2.6.2) outlines a process for considering the best interests of the patient when accepting a compromised clinically critical or irreplaceable sample. The final report should indicate the nature of the problem and advise caution when interpreting affected results, if applicable. Pre-examination and storage: The 2022 document (New clause 7.2.7.3) includes a requirement that, considering the stability of the measurand, the time between sample collection and examination must be specified and monitored when relevant. |
|
7.3 Examination processes
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.9 – 4.14.2 – 5.5.1.1 – 5.5.1.2 – 5.5.1.3 – 5.5.1.4 – 5.5.2 – 5.5.3 – 5.6.1 – 5.6.2.1 – 5.6.2.2 – 5.6.2.3 – 5.6.3.1 – 5.6.3.2 – 5.6.3.3 – 5.6.3.4 – 5.6.4 General overview: Significant changes have been made, including an update and emphasis on clinical decision-making. The requirements related to ensuring the validity of examination results have been restructured, with a focus on the use of alternative methods when Internal Quality Control (IQC) or External Quality Assessment (EQA) not available.
|
|
7.4 Post-examination processes
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.5.2 – 4.13 – 5.4.7 – 5.7.1 – 5.7.2 – 5.8.1 – 5.8.2 – 5.8.3 – 5.9.1 – 5.9.2 – 5.9.3 General overview: The 2022 document introduces several minor changes, emphasizing simplifications in reporting and enhancements in critical results communication. Key updates include:
– Automated selection and reporting: The 2022 document prioritizes clear, documented criteria for automated selection, validation prior to use, and verification following changes to ensure transparency, accuracy, and reliability. It emphasizes the identification of sample interferences and mandates rapid suspension of testing to enhance safety and control. In contrast, the 2012 document briefly touches on criteria and validation but lacks specific details. – Post-examination sample handling: A separate section in the 2022 document outlines specific requirements for sample retention, storage conditions, and disposal, emphasizing the importance of maintaining sample suitability for additional examination whenever possible to maximize potential use. – Critical results: The 2022 document defines escalation procedures for contacting responsible personnel in case of delays, ensuring timely notification and prompt action. |
|
7.5 Nonconforming work
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.9 General overview: The 2022 document introduces minor changes, including a rearrangement of the requirements related to nonconforming work and non-conformities, with a stronger focus on risks. Key updates include: – Rearrangement of requirements: The requirements concerning nonconforming work and non-conformities have been reorganized to enhance clarity and focus. This change aims to improve the understanding of processes related to handling nonconformities. • Risk analysis and patient safety: There is a heightened focus on conducting risk analyses related to nonconformities, specifically assessing potential harm to patients. This includes identifying risks associated with nonconforming work and implementing strategies to mitigate these risks effectively. Additionally, a thorough evaluation of both the risk and clinical impact of nonconformities is crucial in determining their acceptability. |
|
7.6 Control of data and information management
EN ISO 15189:2012: 5.10.1 – 5.10.2 – 5.10.3 The 2022 document is essentially similar to the previous version (2012:5.10) but incorporates important updates: – Regulatory references: While the 2022 document no longer explicitly references national or international regulations, it acknowledges the emergence of the EU GDPR and cybersecurity regulations that have been implemented since the last revision. – Explicit sections on downtime plans: The 2022 version includes specific sections addressing downtime plans, which outline procedures and contingencies to follow during system outages. This is detailed further in Section 2022: 7.8. – Off-site systems: The updated document acknowledges the use of off-site (e.g., cloud-based) systems, ensuring that protocols for these systems are clearly defined and managed. – Cybersecurity systems: There is a new emphasis on the introduction of cybersecurity systems to protect data integrity and confidentiality. – Laboratory responsibility: The 2022 document reinforces the laboratory’s ultimate responsibility for data and information management, ensuring that all data handling processes comply with relevant regulations and best practices. – Correct data presentation in information systems outside the control are no longer a responsibility of the laboratory. A major relaxation compared to the 2012 version is that the standard now recognizes that laboratories cannot be responsible for what they cannot control. Therefore, the standard no longer requires that the laboratory shall verify that the results of examinations, associated information and comments are accurately reproduced, electronically and in hard copy where relevant, by the information systems external to the laboratory intended to directly receive the information (e.g. computer systems, fax machines, e-mail, website, personal web devices). |
|
7.7 Complaints
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.8 – 5.4.2 The updated standards introduce requirements, including: – Process requirement: A structured handling process is now mandatory to confirm that compliant relates to laboratory activities and to receive, substantiate and investigate them. – Receipt and resolution: New requirements have been established concerning the receipt of requests and the resolution of issues that may arise. – Maintaining impartiality: It is essential that these processes do not compromise the laboratory’s impartiality, ensuring that all actions taken are fair and unbiased. |
|
7.8 Continuity and emergency preparedness planning
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.1.1.4 Emergency planning has been explicitly recognized as a new requirement. While the 2012 version often audited emergency preparedness through risk analysis and service level agreements for mutual assistance in disasters, the 2022 standard required regular real-life testing of these plans to validate their effectiveness. – Periodic testing of plans: Emergency plans must be periodically tested, ensuring that the laboratory is prepared for potential risks and challenges. – Exercising response capabilities: The planned response capabilities should be exercised whenever practicable, allowing staff to become familiar with procedures and improve their effectiveness. – Information and training: Relevant laboratory personnel must receive appropriate information and training to ensure they understand their roles and responsibilities during emergencies. – Global approach: This approach is not limited to system failures or downtime in information systems (as outlined in Section 7.6.4). Instead, it encompasses a broader perspective on risk management. |
| 8 Management system requirements |
|
8.1 General requirements
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.1.2.3 – 4.2.1 – 4.2.2.2 – 5.1.5 General overview The updated standards include a new clause focused on management system awareness, featuring adjustments to enhance clarity and effectiveness. The standards now allow for the amalgamation of various types of documents, promoting flexibility in how management system information is presented and accessed. |
|
8.2 Management system documentation
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.1.2.1 – 4.1.2.4 – 4.2.2.1 – 4.2.2.2 – 4.3 Removal of quality manual and quality policy requirements In the updated standards the requirements for both an explicit and specific quality manual and a quality policy have been removed. This change reflects a shift towards more flexible documentation practices, allowing laboratories to customise their quality management systems without the constraints of these specific documents. |
|
8.3 Control of management system documents
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.3 Document management requirements – Protection against unauthorized tampering: To ensure their integrity, active documents must be protected against unauthorised deletion or modification. – Accessibility for users: Active documents must be readily available to authorized users to facilitate proper usage and reference. – Retention of outdated versions: Outdated document versions must be retained for appropriate retention periods, ensuring compliance with regulatory and organizational policies. |
|
8.4 Control of records
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.13 – 5.9.3 The 2022 standards adopt a less prescriptive approach regarding documentation by removing the specific list of required records. However, specific procedures discussed above may require record keeping which is not repeated in this section. Key overall changes include: – Traceability of records: Organizations must ensure traceability for all records, facilitating easy tracking and retrieval. – Flexible documentation structure: A set of documents can now replace the traditional quality manual, allowing for a more adaptable and streamlined approach to documentation. – Retention times: A risk based approached is now mentioned as possible rationale for record retention times |
|
8.5 Actions to address risks and opportunities for improvement EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.11 – 4.12 – 4.14.6 A new clause emphasizes the need to address both risks and opportunities for improvement to enhance the effectiveness of the management system and ultimately improve patient care. Key points include: – Prioritization of actions: Actions taken in response to identified risks and opportunities should be proportional to their potential impact on results and patient safety. – Flexibility in risk management: While addressing risks is essential, there are no formal risk management methods mandated (as mentioned in Section 8.5.2 Note 2). |
|
8.6 Improvement
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.11 – 4.12 – 4.14.3 – 4.14.4 – Focus on risk identification: Opportunities for improvement should be specifically directed at areas identified through risk assessment. – Removal of preventive actions: The standard has removed the requirement for formal preventive actions. – Follow-up on effectiveness: There is an emphasis on the necessity to follow up on the effectiveness of actions taken to ensure continual improvement. |
|
8.7 Nonconformities and corrective actions
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.9 – 4.10 – 4.14.8 – Updating Risks and Opportunities: There is a requirement to regularly update the identified risks and opportunities for improvement within the management system, if necessary. – Replacement of preventive actions: The concept of preventive actions has been replaced by focusing on risks and opportunities for improvement. – Evaluation of effectiveness: The standard now includes a mandate to review and evaluate the effectiveness of corrective actions taken. |
|
8.8 Evaluations
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.14.1 – 4.14.5 – 4.14.7 – Prioritization of patient risks: The planning of internal audits now places greater emphasis on risks to patients arising from laboratory activities. The audit schedule should be aligned with these identified risks. While the overall structure of internal audits remains similar, there is a heightened focus on ensuring patient safety. – Follow-up on effectiveness: It is emphasised that the effectiveness of the measures taken must be monitored to ensure continuous improvement, in particular through feedback from patients, requestors and personnel. |
|
8.9 Management reviews
EN ISO 15189:2012: 4.15.1 – 4.14.3 – 4.15.2 – 4.15.4 The management review section appears to have remained essentially unchanged from the previous version. |
|
Annex A
ISO 22870:2016: 4.1.1 – 4.1.2.1 – 4.2.2.1– 4.2.2.1 – 4.4 – 5.1.4 The new annex introduces some flexibility in how organizations manage their processes but does not significantly alter the core requirements. By removing the requirement of mandatory specific groups like a health professional grouping and a multidisciplinary POCT management group, it allows laboratories to tailor their management structures more to their specific needs and circumstances. |
This document contains 2 annexes:
Annex 1 describes the C: A/ISO specific comments to the most important changes. Annex 2 describes the impact of the revision of the standard on the persisting validity of earlier published specific guidance on the standard by C: A/ISO.
| Previous committee guidance and publication | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Flexible scope for ISO 15189 accreditation: a guidance prepared by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (WG-A/ISO) [13]
(Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:1173–80) Thelen MHM, Vanstapel FJLA, Kroupis C, Vukasovic I, Boursier G, Barrett E, Bernabeu Andreu F, Meško Brguljan P, Brugnoni D, Lohmander M, Šprongl L, Vodnik T, Ghita I, Vaubourdolle M, Huisman W. Updates in references to paragraph numbers from the 2012 to the 2022 version of the ISO 15189 document and possible impact for statements in the guidance. |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| ISO 15189:2012 | ISO 15189:2022 | Impact of the change | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Section 5.5.1 Selection, verification, and validation of examination procedures |
Section 7.3.1 General |
No impact on the meaning and usability | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Documenting metrological traceability as intended by ISO 15189:2012: A consensus statement about the practice of the implementation and auditing of this norm element [14] (Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:459–64) Thelen M, Vanstapel F, Meško Brguljan P, Gouget B, Boursier G, Barrett E, Kroupis C, Lohmander M, Šprongl L, Vodnik T, Bernabeu-Andreu F, Vukasovic I, Sönmez C, Linko S, Brugnoni D, Vaubourdolle M, Huisman W, Panteghini Mand on behalf of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (WG-A/ISO) Updates in references to paragraph numbers form the 2012 to the 2022 version of the ISO 15189 document and possible impact for statements in the guidance. |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| ISO 15189:2012 | ISO 15189:2022 | Impact of the change | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Section 4.14.6 Risk management |
Section 5.6 Risk management Section 8.5 Actions to address risks and opportunities for improvement Section 8.5.1 Identifications of risks and actions taken Section 8.5.2 Acting on risks and opportunities for improvement |
No impact on the meaning and usability | ||||||
| Section 5.3.1.4 Equipment calibration and metrological traceability |
Section 6.5 Equipment calibration and metrological traceability |
No impact on the meaning and usability | ||||||
| Section 5.5.1.2 Verification of examination procedures |
Section 7.3.2 Verification of examination methods | No impact on the meaning and usability | ||||||
| Section 5.5.1.3 Validation of examination procedures |
Section 7.3.3 Validation of examination methods |
No impact on the meaning and usability | ||||||
| Section 5.5.1.4 Measurement uncertainty of measured quantity values |
Section 7.3.4 Evaluation of measurement uncertainty |
No impact on the meaning and usability | ||||||
| Section 5.6.2 Quality control |
Section 7.3.7.2 Internal quality control (IQC) |
No impact on the meaning and usability | ||||||
| Section 5.6.3 Interlaboratory comparisons |
Section 7.3.7.3 External quality assessment (EQA) |
No impact on the meaning and usability | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Validation and verification of examination procedures in medical laboratories: opinion of the EFLM Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (WG-A/ISO) on dealing with ISO 15189:2012 demands for method verification and validation [15] (Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:361–7) Roelofsen-de Beer R, Wielders J, Boursier G, Vodnik T, Vanstapel F, Huisman W, Vukasovic I, Vaubourdolle M, Sönmez Ç, Linko S, Brugnoni D, Kroupis C, Lohmander M, Šprongl L, Bernabeu-Andreu F, Meško Brguljan P, Thelen M. Updates in references to paragraph numbers from the 2012 to the 2022 version of the ISO 15189 document and possible impact for statements in the guidance. |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| ISO 15189:2012 | ISO 15189:2022 | Impact of the change | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Section 5.3.1.4 Equipment calibration and metrological traceability |
Section 6.5 Equipment calibration and metrological traceability |
No impact on the meaning and usability | ||||||
| Section 5.5.1 Selection, verification, and validation of examination procedures |
Section 7.3.1 General |
No impact on the meaning and usability | ||||||
| Section 5.5.1.2 Verification of examination procedures |
Section 7.3.2 Verification of examination methods | No impact on the meaning and usability | ||||||
| Section 5.5.1.3 Validation of examination procedures |
Section 7.3.3 Validation of examination methods |
No impact on the meaning and usability | ||||||
| Section 5.5.1.4 Measurement uncertainty of measured quantity values | Section 7.3.4 Evaluation of measurement uncertainty |
No impact on the meaning and usability | ||||||
| Section 5.6.2 Quality control, including all subparagraphs |
Section 7.3.7.2 Internal quality control (IQC) |
No impact on the meaning and usability | ||||||
| Section 5.6.3 Interlaboratory comparisons, including all subparagraphs |
Section 7.3.7.3 External quality assessment (EQA) |
No impact on the meaning and usability | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Improving the laboratory result release process in the light of ISO 15189:2012 standard [16] (Clin Chim Acta 2021;522:167–73) Çubukçu H, Vanstapel F, Thelen M, A Bernabeu-Andreu F, van Schrojenstein Lantman M, Brugnoni D, Meško Brguljan P, Milinkovic N, Linko S, Vaubourdolle M, O’Kelly R, Kroupis C, Lohmander M, Šprongl L, Panteghini M, Boursier G, European Federation of Clinical Chemistry, Laboratory Medicine EFLM Working Group Accreditation, ISO/CEN standards WG-A/ISO Impact of changes in the specific references with respect to the update on ISO 15189 sections: |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| ISO 15189:2012 | ISO 15189:2022 | Impact of the change | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Section 5.9.1 (general) as part of 5.9. reporting of results | Section 7.4.1 Reporting of results |
No impact on the meaning and usability | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
An approach for determining allowable between reagent lot variation [17] (Clin Chem Lab Med 2022;60:681–8) C van Schrojenstein Lantman M, Can Çubukçu H, Boursier G, Panteghini M, Bernabeu-Andreu FA, Milinkovic N, Meško Brguljan P, Linko S, Brugnoni D, O’Kelly R, Kroupis C, Lohmander M, Šprongl L, Vanstapel F, Thelen M, European Federation of Clinical Chemistry, Laboratory Medicine EFLM Working Group Accreditation, ISO/CEN standards WG-A/ISO Impact of the change: None, no references made to specific paragraphs of ISO 15189 |
||||||||
|
APS calculator: a data-driven tool for setting outcome-based analytical performance specifications for measurement uncertainty using specific clinical requirements and population data [18]
(Clin Chem Lab Med 2023; 62:597–607) Cubukcu HC, Vanstapel F, Thelen M, van Schrojenstein Lantman M, Bernabeu-Andreu FA, Meško Brguljan P, Milinkovic N, Linko S, Panteghini M, Boursier G. Impact of the change: None |
||||||||
|
EFLM Working Group accreditation and ISO/CEN standards on dealing with ISO 15189 demands for retention of documents and examination objects [19]
(Adv Lab Med 2024;5:103–8) Mesko Brguljan P, Thelen M, Bernabeu-Andreu F, Kroupis C, Boursier G, Vukasovic I, Barrett E, Brugnoni D, Lohmander M, Sprongl L, Vodnik T, Ghita I, Vanstapel F, Vaubourdolle M, Huisman W. Impact of the change: None |
||||||||
|
ISO 15189 is a sufficient instrument to guarantee high-quality manufacture of laboratory developed tests for in-house-use conform requirements of the European In-Vitro-Diagnostics Regulation [20]
(Clin Chem Lab Med 2023; 61: 608–626). Florent J.L.A. Vanstapel, Matthias Orth, Thomas Streichert, Ettore D. Capoluongo, Wytze P. Oosterhuis, Hikmet Can Çubukçu, Francisco A. Bernabeu-Andreu, Marc Thelen, Leo H.J. Jacobs, Solveig Linko, Harjit Pal Bhattoa, Patrick M.M. Bossuyt, Pika Meško Brguljan, Guilaine Boursier, Christa M. Cobbaert and Michael Neumaier A summary of equivalent clauses of ISO 15189 and IVDR requirements for Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs): |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| ISO 15189:2022 | EU 2017/746 IVDR 5 (5) [21] | |||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Section 1 Primacy of local regulations |
Section 5.5 c Refers to ISO 15189 |
|||||||
| Section 7.3.3.a Conditions requiring “validation” |
Section 5.5 Laboratory Developed Tests |
|||||||
| Section 7.3.1.b, 7.3.3.b-e Fit-for intended use | Section 5.5 d Intended purpose |
|||||||
| Section 7.3.1.a Preferred procedures |
ANNEX I Scientific validity |
|||||||
| Section 7.3.3.b, d Requirements for intended use fulfilled | Section 7.3.3.b, d Clinical performance |
|||||||
| Section 7.3.3.b Analytical Performance |
ANNEX I 9.1 b Analytical performance |
|||||||
| Section 5.6, 8.5 Risk management and Section 6.3.1 Safety |
Section 5.5 f iii, ANNEX I Ch. I Safety |
|||||||
| Section 7.5, 8.5.1.d, 8.5.2, 8.9.2.c, f Risk mitigation |
Section 5.5 I, ANNEX I 9.2 Surveillance |
|||||||
| Section 6.4-5 Equipment and Section 6.6 Reagents, consumables |
Section 5.5 g, h Manufacturing of devices |
|||||||
| Section 7.3.1.c, 7.3.3.e.5 Register validation-file |
Section 5.5 e, f Summary statements |
|||||||
| Section 7.2.2 Information for users |
Section 5.5 f Transparency to users |
|||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Impact of the change: None. ISO 15189:2022 remains fully in line with the IVDR. EU publication of the replacement of the 2012 by the 2022 version as harmonized standard 2024/581 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2024/581 of 16 February 2024 on the harmonised standard for accreditation of medical laboratories drafted in support of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council Official Journal of the European Union Official Journal of the European Union L-series 20.2.2024. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L_202400581 [22] |
||||||||
Conclusions
The C: A/ISO is committed to fostering a unified approach to laboratory accreditation in Europe. Through the development of guidance documents and educational initiatives, it aims to support medical laboratories in successfully navigating the changes brought about by the EN ISO 15189:2022 revision, ultimately enhancing the quality and safety of laboratory services across the region.
The transition from EN ISO 15189:2012 to EN ISO 15189:2022 represents a significant evolution in the standards governing laboratory practices. The 2022 version emphasizes a more explicit and comprehensive approach to impartiality, confidentiality, patient care and patient interest in particular risk management, emergency planning, and documentation requirements. These enhancements aim to improve laboratory quality and patient safety, ensuring that laboratories not only meet regulatory requirements but also foster trust and transparency in their operations.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: Not applicable.
Annex 1: Analysis and general remarks on the most important changes
Annex 2: Analysis of the impact of the EN ISO 15189 revision on the previous C: A/ISO guidance documents and publications
References
1. ISO 15189:2022. Medical laboratories – requirements for quality and competence. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO); 2022.Suche in Google Scholar
2. ISO 15189:2012. Medical laboratories – requirements for quality and competence. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO); 2012.Suche in Google Scholar
3. ISO 22870:2016. Point-of-care testing (POCT)-requirements for quality and competence. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO); 2016.Suche in Google Scholar
4. ISO/IEC 17025:2017. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO); 2017.Suche in Google Scholar
5. ISO/TS 22583:2024. Requirements and recommendations for supervisors and operators of point-of-care testing (POCT) equipment. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO); 2024.Suche in Google Scholar
6. ISO 22367:2020. Medical laboratories – application of risk management to medical laboratories. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO); 2020.Suche in Google Scholar
7. ISO 15190:2020. Medical laboratories – requirements for safety. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO); 2020.Suche in Google Scholar
8. ISO 35001:2019. Biorisk management for laboratories and other related organizations. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO); 2019.Suche in Google Scholar
9. ISO/TS 20914:2019. Medical laboratories - practical guide for measurement of uncertainty. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2019.Suche in Google Scholar
10. ISO 20658:2023. Medical laboratories – requirements for the collection and transport of samples for medical laboratory examinations. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2023.Suche in Google Scholar
11. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance). Off J European Union 4.5.2016.Suche in Google Scholar
12. ISO 17511:2020. In vitro diagnostic medical devices — requirements for establishing metrological traceability of values assigned to calibrators, trueness control materials and human samples. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO); 2020.Suche in Google Scholar
13. Thelen, MHM, Vanstapel, FJLA, Kroupis, C, Vukasovic, I, Boursier, G, Barrett, E, et al.. Flexible scope for ISO 15189 accreditation: a guidance prepared by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (WG-A/ISO). Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:1173–80. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2015-0257.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
14. Thelen, M, Vanstapel, F, Meško Brguljan, P, Gouget, B, Boursier, G, Barrett, E, et al., on behalf of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (WG-A/ISO). Documenting metrological traceability as intended by ISO 15189:2012: a consensus statement about the practice of the implementation and auditing of this norm element. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:459–64. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-1212.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
15. Roelofsen-de Beer, R, Wielders, J, Boursier, G, Vodnik, T, Vanstapel, F, Huisman, W, et al.. Validation and verification of examination procedures in medical laboratories: opinion of the EFLM Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (WG-A/ISO) on dealing with ISO 15189:2012 demands for method verification and validation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:361–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-1053.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
16. Çubukçu, H, Vanstapel, F, Thelen, M, A Bernabeu-Andreu, F, van Schrojenstein Lantman, M, Brugnoni, D, et al.. European Federation of Clinical Chemistry, Laboratory Medicine EFLM Working Group Accreditation, ISO/CEN standards WG-A/ISO. Improving the laboratory result release process in the light of ISO 15189:2012 standard. Clin Chim Acta 2021;522:167–73.10.1016/j.cca.2021.08.013Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
17. van Schrojenstein Lantman, MC, Can Çubukçu, H, Boursier, G, Panteghini, M, Bernabeu-Andreu, FA, Milinkovic, N, et al., European Federation of Clinical Chemistry, Laboratory Medicine EFLM Working Group Accreditation. ISO/CEN standards WG-A/ISO. An approach for determining allowable between reagent lot variation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022;60:681–8.10.1515/cclm-2022-0083Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
18. Cubukcu, HC, Vanstapel, F, Thelen, M, van Schrojenstein Lantman, M, Bernabeu-Andreu, FA, Meško Brguljan, P, et al.. APS calculator: a data-driven tool for setting outcome-based analytical performance specifications for measurement uncertainty using specific clinical requirements and population data. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023;62:597–607. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0740.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
19. Meško Brguljan, P, Thelen, M, Bernabeu-Andreu, F, Kroupis, C, Boursier, G, Vukasovic, I, et al.. EFLM Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards on dealing with ISO 15189 demands for retention of documents and examination objects. Adv Lab Med 2024;5:103–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/almed-2023-0053.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
20. Vanstapel, FJLA, Orth, M, Streichert, T, Capoluongo, ED, Oosterhuis, WP, Çubukçu, HC, et al.. ISO 15189 is a sufficient instrument to guarantee high-quality manufacture of laboratory developed tests for in-house-use conform requirements of the European In-Vitro-Diagnostics Regulation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023;61:608–26. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0045.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
21. Regulation (EU) 2017/746 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices and repealing Directive 98/79/EC and Commission Decision 2010/227/EU (Text with EEA relevance). Off J European Union 5.5.2017.Suche in Google Scholar
22. Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/581 of 16 February 2024 on the harmonised standard for accreditation of medical laboratories (drafted in support of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council) (Text with EEA relevance). Off J European Union 20.2.2024.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorials
- The Friedewald formula strikes back
- Liquid biopsy in oncology: navigating technical hurdles and future transition for precision medicine
- The neglected issue of pyridoxal- 5′ phosphate
- Reviews
- Health literacy: a new challenge for laboratory medicine
- Clinical applications of circulating tumor cell detection: challenges and strategies
- Opinion Papers
- Pleural effusion as a sample matrix for laboratory analyses in cancer management: a perspective
- Interest of hair tests to discriminate a tail end of a doping regimen from a possible unpredictable source of a prohibited substance in case of challenging an anti-doping rule violation
- Perspectives
- Sigma Metrics misconceptions and limitations
- EN ISO 15189 revision: EFLM Committee Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (C: A/ISO) analysis and general remarks on the changes
- General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
- Evaluation of current indirect methods for measuring LDL-cholesterol
- Verification of automated review, release and reporting of results with assessment of the risk of harm for patients: the procedure algorithm proposal for clinical laboratories
- Progranulin measurement with a new automated method: a step forward in the diagnostic approach to neurodegenerative disorders
- A comparative analysis of current С-peptide assays compared to a reference method: can we overcome inertia to standardization?
- Blood samples for ammonia analysis do not require transport to the laboratory on ice: a study of ammonia stability and cause of in vitro ammonia increase in samples from patients with hyperammonaemia
- A physio-chemical mathematical model of the effects of blood analysis delay on acid-base, metabolite and electrolyte status: evaluation in blood from critical care patients
- Evolution of autoimmune diagnostics over the past 10 years: lessons learned from the UK NEQAS external quality assessment EQA programs
- Comparison between monotest and traditional batch-based ELISA assays for therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab and adalimumab levels and anti-drug antibodies
- Evaluation of pre-analytical factors impacting urine test strip and chemistry results
- Evaluation of AUTION EYE AI-4510 flow cell morphology analyzer for counting particles in urine
- Reference Values and Biological Variations
- Estimation of the allowable total error of the absolute CD34+ cell count by flow cytometry using data from UK NEQAS exercises 2004–2024
- Establishment of gender– and age–related reference intervals for serum uric acid in adults based on big data from Zhejiang Province in China
- Cancer Diagnostics
- Tumor specific protein 70 targeted tumor cell isolation technology can improve the accuracy of cytopathological examination
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Diagnostic performance of Mindray CL1200i high sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay compared to Abbott Alinity cardiac troponin I assay for the diagnosis of type 1 and 2 acute myocardial infarction in females and males: MERITnI study
- Infectious Diseases
- Evidence-based assessment of the application of Six Sigma to infectious disease serology quality control
- Letters to the Editor
- Evaluating the accuracy of ChatGPT in classifying normal and abnormal blood cell morphology
- Refining within-subject biological variation estimation using routine laboratory data: practical applications of the refineR algorithm
- Early rule-out high-sensitivity troponin protocols require continuous analytical robustness: a caution regarding the potential for troponin assay down-calibration
- Biochemical evidence of vitamin B12 deficiency: a crucial issue to address supplementation in pregnant women
- Plasmacytoid dendritic cell proliferation and acute myeloid leukemia with minimal differentiation (AML-M0)
- Failing methemoglobin blood gas analyses in a sodium nitrite intoxication
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorials
- The Friedewald formula strikes back
- Liquid biopsy in oncology: navigating technical hurdles and future transition for precision medicine
- The neglected issue of pyridoxal- 5′ phosphate
- Reviews
- Health literacy: a new challenge for laboratory medicine
- Clinical applications of circulating tumor cell detection: challenges and strategies
- Opinion Papers
- Pleural effusion as a sample matrix for laboratory analyses in cancer management: a perspective
- Interest of hair tests to discriminate a tail end of a doping regimen from a possible unpredictable source of a prohibited substance in case of challenging an anti-doping rule violation
- Perspectives
- Sigma Metrics misconceptions and limitations
- EN ISO 15189 revision: EFLM Committee Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (C: A/ISO) analysis and general remarks on the changes
- General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
- Evaluation of current indirect methods for measuring LDL-cholesterol
- Verification of automated review, release and reporting of results with assessment of the risk of harm for patients: the procedure algorithm proposal for clinical laboratories
- Progranulin measurement with a new automated method: a step forward in the diagnostic approach to neurodegenerative disorders
- A comparative analysis of current С-peptide assays compared to a reference method: can we overcome inertia to standardization?
- Blood samples for ammonia analysis do not require transport to the laboratory on ice: a study of ammonia stability and cause of in vitro ammonia increase in samples from patients with hyperammonaemia
- A physio-chemical mathematical model of the effects of blood analysis delay on acid-base, metabolite and electrolyte status: evaluation in blood from critical care patients
- Evolution of autoimmune diagnostics over the past 10 years: lessons learned from the UK NEQAS external quality assessment EQA programs
- Comparison between monotest and traditional batch-based ELISA assays for therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab and adalimumab levels and anti-drug antibodies
- Evaluation of pre-analytical factors impacting urine test strip and chemistry results
- Evaluation of AUTION EYE AI-4510 flow cell morphology analyzer for counting particles in urine
- Reference Values and Biological Variations
- Estimation of the allowable total error of the absolute CD34+ cell count by flow cytometry using data from UK NEQAS exercises 2004–2024
- Establishment of gender– and age–related reference intervals for serum uric acid in adults based on big data from Zhejiang Province in China
- Cancer Diagnostics
- Tumor specific protein 70 targeted tumor cell isolation technology can improve the accuracy of cytopathological examination
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Diagnostic performance of Mindray CL1200i high sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay compared to Abbott Alinity cardiac troponin I assay for the diagnosis of type 1 and 2 acute myocardial infarction in females and males: MERITnI study
- Infectious Diseases
- Evidence-based assessment of the application of Six Sigma to infectious disease serology quality control
- Letters to the Editor
- Evaluating the accuracy of ChatGPT in classifying normal and abnormal blood cell morphology
- Refining within-subject biological variation estimation using routine laboratory data: practical applications of the refineR algorithm
- Early rule-out high-sensitivity troponin protocols require continuous analytical robustness: a caution regarding the potential for troponin assay down-calibration
- Biochemical evidence of vitamin B12 deficiency: a crucial issue to address supplementation in pregnant women
- Plasmacytoid dendritic cell proliferation and acute myeloid leukemia with minimal differentiation (AML-M0)
- Failing methemoglobin blood gas analyses in a sodium nitrite intoxication