Home A comparative analysis of current С-peptide assays compared to a reference method: can we overcome inertia to standardization?
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A comparative analysis of current С-peptide assays compared to a reference method: can we overcome inertia to standardization?

  • Curt Rohlfing , Gregory Petroski , Shawn M. Connolly , Steven Hanson , Randie R. Little and Kuanysh Kabytaev ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 14, 2025

Abstract

Objectives

C-peptide is an equimolar by-product of insulin biosynthesis. It is used clinically to assess insulin secretion and differentiate types of diabetes. However, the lack of standardization across assays limits its broader application. This study aimed to examine discrepancies between the leading C-peptide measurement methods used in clinical laboratories and propose a solution to reduce them based on a complete traceability chain.

Methods

Two sets of serum samples were distributed to 10 manufacturers of C-peptide assays. The first set (A, n=20) was analyzed independently by each manufacturer, who then returned their results to us. Subsequently, we sent out the second set (B, n=20) along with the reference values for set A. For set B, each manufacturer provided both non-calibrated and recalibrated values for each sample. The recalibration was performed according to each manufacturer’s internal standard protocols. We assessed how recalibration affected agreement between methods and alignment with the reference method. Non-parametric statistical approaches, including Passing-Bablok regression, level of agreement, and standard deviation analysis, were applied to compare data from multiple perspectives.

Results

Despite most manufacturers using the same WHO C-peptide calibrator material, significant disagreement was observed between methods prior to recalibration. Recalibration with matrix-appropriate serum samples reduced the discordance among assays, bringing them closer to the reference method. Overall, recalibration reduced both systematic bias and individual assay disagreement.

Conclusions

These findings underscore the importance of appropriate calibration schemes to improve agreement across C-peptide assays, enhancing the accuracy of C-peptide testing for clinical practice.


Corresponding author: Kuanysh Kabytaev, Pathology & Anatomical Sciences, University of Missouri, 1 Hospital Drive, Columbia, 65211 MO, USA, E-mail:

Funding source: NIH/NIDDK

Award Identifier / Grant number: U01DK096587

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the following manufacturers for their participation in our study: Abbott Laboratories, Beckman Coulter Inc., DiaSorin Deutschland GmbH, QuidelOrtho, Fujirebio Inc., Siemens Healthineers, Tosoh Corporation, ALPCO, Mercodia AB, and Roche Diagnostics GmbH.

  1. Research ethics: The protocols were approved by the University of Missouri Health Sciences Institutional Review Board (#2031722).

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: Not applicable.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: This work was supported by NIH/NIDDK [Grant Number U01DK096587].

  7. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Kruszynska, YT, Home, PD, Hanning, I, Alberti, KGMM. Basal and 24-h C-peptide and insulin secretion rate in normal man. Diabetologia 1987;30:16–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01788901.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Tillil, H. Assessment of insulin production and secretion dynamics in health and disease, including diabetes. Res Methodol Human Diabetes Part 2020;1:133–46.Search in Google Scholar

3. Bukmann Larsen, P, Linneberg, A, Hansen, T, Friis-Hansen, L. Reference intervals for C-peptide and insulin derived from a general adult Danish population. Clin Biochem 2017;50:408–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.12.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Najjar, SM, Perdomo, G. Hepatic insulin clearance: mechanism and physiology. Physiology 2019;34:198–215. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.00048.2018.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Bergman, RN, Piccinini, F, Kabir, M, Kolka, CM, Ader, M. Hypothesis: role of reduced hepatic insulin clearance in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2019;68:1709–16. https://doi.org/10.2337/db19-0098.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Lachin, JM, McGee, P, Palmer, JP, For the DCCT/EDIC Research Group. Impact of C-peptide preservation on metabolic and clinical outcomes in the diabetes control and Complications trial. Diabetes 2014;63:739–48. https://doi.org/10.2337/db13-0881.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Herold, KC, Gitelman, SE, Ehlers, MR, Gottlieb, PA, Greenbaum, CJ, Hagopian, W, et al.. Teplizumab (anti-CD3 mAb) treatment preserves C-peptide responses in patients with new-onset type 1 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial: metabolic and immunologic features at baseline identify a subgroup of responders. Diabetes 2013;62:3766–74. https://doi.org/10.2337/db13-0345.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Taylor, PN, Collins, KS, Lam, A, Karpen, SR, Greeno, B, Walker, F, et al.. C-peptide and metabolic outcomes in trials of disease-modifying therapy in new-onset type 1 diabetes: an individual participant meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2023;11:915–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(23)00267-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Latres, E, Greenbaum, CJ, Oyaski, ML, Dayan, CM, Colhoun, HM, Lachin, JM, et al.. Evidence for C-peptide as a validated surrogate to predict clinical benefits in trials of disease-modifying therapies for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2024;73:823–33. https://doi.org/10.2337/dbi23-0012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Leighton, E, Sainsbury, CA, Jones, GC. A practical review of C-peptide testing in diabetes. Diabetes Ther 2017;8:475–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0265-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Aleppo, G, Bannuru, RR, Bruemmer, D, Collins, BS, Ekhlaspour, L, et al., American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes: standards of care in diabetes–2024. Diabetes Care 2024;47:S20–42. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-s002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Holt, RIG, DeVries, JH, Hess-Fischl, A, Hirsch, IB, Kirkman, MS, Klupa, T, et al.. The management of type 1 diabetes in adults: a consensus report by the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2021;44:2589–625. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci21-0043.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Wiedmeyer, HM, Polonsky, KS, Myers, GL, Little, RR, Greenbaum, CJ, Goldstein, DE, et al.. International comparison of C-peptide measurements. Clin Chem 2007;53:784–7. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2006.081570.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Little, RR, Rohlfing, CL, Tennill, AL, Madsen, RW, Polonsky, KS, Myers, GL, et al.. Standardization of C-peptide measurements. Clin Chem 2008;54:1023–6. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2007.101287.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Stoyanov, AV, Connolly, S, Rohlfing, CL, Rogatsky, E, Stein, D, Little, RR. Human C-peptide quantitation by LC-MS isotope-dilution assay in serum or urine samples. J Chromatogr Sep Technol 2013;4:172. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7064.1000172.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Little, RR, Wielgosz, RI, Josephs, R, Kinumi, T, Takatsu, A, Li, H, et al.. Implementing a reference measurement system for C-peptide: successes and lessons learned. Clin Chem 2017;63:1447–56. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2016.269274.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Little, RR, Kinumi, T, Connolly, S, Kabytaev, K. Implementing a reference measurement system for C-peptide: an addendum. Clin Chem 2017;63:1904–5. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2017.281170.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. In: The Concise Encyclopedia of Statistics. New York, NY: Springer; 2008.Search in Google Scholar

19. Harrell, FE, Davis, CE. A new distribution-free quantile estimator. Biometrika 1982;69:635–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/69.3.635.Search in Google Scholar

20. Rogatsky, E, Balent, B, Goswami, G, Tomuta, V, Jayatillake, H, Cruikshank, G, et al.. Sensitive quantitative analysis of C-peptide in human plasma by 2-dimensional LC-MS isotope-dilution assay. Clin Chem 2006;52:872–9. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2005.063081.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Ahlqvist, E, Storm, P, Käräjämäki, A, Martinell, M, Dorkhan, M, Carlsson, A, et al.. Novel subgroups of adult-onset diabetes and their association with outcomes: a data-driven cluster analysis of six variables. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2018;6:361–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(18)30051-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Iqbal, S, Jayyab, AA, Alrashdi, AM, Reverté-Villarroya, S. The predictive ability of C-peptide in distinguishing type 1 diabetes from type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocr Pract 2023;29:379–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eprac.2023.01.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. C-Peptide Standardization meetings. Available from: https://cpeptide.org/meetings.html.Search in Google Scholar

24. Florkowski, C, Crooke, M, Reed, M. Implementation of the HbA1c IFCC unit–from the laboratory to the consumer: the New Zealand experience. Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:157–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2013.10.009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Regulation (EU). 2017/746 of the European parliament and of the council. Off J Eur Union 2017. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/746/oj.Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-1260).


Received: 2024-11-01
Accepted: 2024-12-31
Published Online: 2025-01-14
Published in Print: 2025-05-26

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials
  3. The Friedewald formula strikes back
  4. Liquid biopsy in oncology: navigating technical hurdles and future transition for precision medicine
  5. The neglected issue of pyridoxal- 5′ phosphate
  6. Reviews
  7. Health literacy: a new challenge for laboratory medicine
  8. Clinical applications of circulating tumor cell detection: challenges and strategies
  9. Opinion Papers
  10. Pleural effusion as a sample matrix for laboratory analyses in cancer management: a perspective
  11. Interest of hair tests to discriminate a tail end of a doping regimen from a possible unpredictable source of a prohibited substance in case of challenging an anti-doping rule violation
  12. Perspectives
  13. Sigma Metrics misconceptions and limitations
  14. EN ISO 15189 revision: EFLM Committee Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (C: A/ISO) analysis and general remarks on the changes
  15. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  16. Evaluation of current indirect methods for measuring LDL-cholesterol
  17. Verification of automated review, release and reporting of results with assessment of the risk of harm for patients: the procedure algorithm proposal for clinical laboratories
  18. Progranulin measurement with a new automated method: a step forward in the diagnostic approach to neurodegenerative disorders
  19. A comparative analysis of current С-peptide assays compared to a reference method: can we overcome inertia to standardization?
  20. Blood samples for ammonia analysis do not require transport to the laboratory on ice: a study of ammonia stability and cause of in vitro ammonia increase in samples from patients with hyperammonaemia
  21. A physio-chemical mathematical model of the effects of blood analysis delay on acid-base, metabolite and electrolyte status: evaluation in blood from critical care patients
  22. Evolution of autoimmune diagnostics over the past 10 years: lessons learned from the UK NEQAS external quality assessment EQA programs
  23. Comparison between monotest and traditional batch-based ELISA assays for therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab and adalimumab levels and anti-drug antibodies
  24. Evaluation of pre-analytical factors impacting urine test strip and chemistry results
  25. Evaluation of AUTION EYE AI-4510 flow cell morphology analyzer for counting particles in urine
  26. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  27. Estimation of the allowable total error of the absolute CD34+ cell count by flow cytometry using data from UK NEQAS exercises 2004–2024
  28. Establishment of gender– and age–related reference intervals for serum uric acid in adults based on big data from Zhejiang Province in China
  29. Cancer Diagnostics
  30. Tumor specific protein 70 targeted tumor cell isolation technology can improve the accuracy of cytopathological examination
  31. Cardiovascular Diseases
  32. Diagnostic performance of Mindray CL1200i high sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay compared to Abbott Alinity cardiac troponin I assay for the diagnosis of type 1 and 2 acute myocardial infarction in females and males: MERITnI study
  33. Infectious Diseases
  34. Evidence-based assessment of the application of Six Sigma to infectious disease serology quality control
  35. Letters to the Editor
  36. Evaluating the accuracy of ChatGPT in classifying normal and abnormal blood cell morphology
  37. Refining within-subject biological variation estimation using routine laboratory data: practical applications of the refineR algorithm
  38. Early rule-out high-sensitivity troponin protocols require continuous analytical robustness: a caution regarding the potential for troponin assay down-calibration
  39. Biochemical evidence of vitamin B12 deficiency: a crucial issue to address supplementation in pregnant women
  40. Plasmacytoid dendritic cell proliferation and acute myeloid leukemia with minimal differentiation (AML-M0)
  41. Failing methemoglobin blood gas analyses in a sodium nitrite intoxication
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2024-1260/html
Scroll to top button